Stroke Volume and Stroke Volume Variation, but not Cardiac Index Is Associated With Survival of Majorly Burned Patients in Early Burn Shock.

Adequate fluid therapy is crucial to maintain organ function after burn trauma. Major burns lead to a systemic response with fluid loss and cardiac dysfunction. To guide fluid therapy, measurement of cardiac pre- and afterload is helpful. Whereas cardiac function is usually measured after admission to intensive care unit (ICU), in this study, hemodynamic monitoring was performed directly after arrival at hospital. We conducted a prospective cohort study with inclusion of 19 patients (male/female 13/6, 55 ± 18 years, mean total body surface area 36 ± 19%). Arterial waveform analysis (PulsioFlexProAqt®, Getinge) was implemented immediately after admission to hospital to measure cardiac pre- and afterload and to guide resuscitation therapy. Cardiac parameters 3.75 (2.67-6.0) h after trauma were normal regarding cardiac index (3.45 ± 0.82) L/min/m², systemic vascular resistance index (1749 ± 533) dyn sec/cm5 m2, and stroke volume (SV; 80 ± 20) mL. Stroke volume variation (SVV) was increased (21 ± 7) % and associated with mortality (mean SVV survivors vs nonsurvivors 18.92 (±6.37) % vs 27.6 (±5.68) %, P = .017). Stroke volume was associated with mortality at the time of ICU-admission (mean SV survivors vs nonsurvivors 90 (±20) mL vs 50 (±0) mL, P = .004). Changes after volume challenge were significant for SVV (24 ± 9 vs19 ± 8%, P = .01) and SV (68 ± 24 vs 76 ± 26 mL, P = .03). We described association of SVV and SV with survival of severely burned patients in an observational study. This indicates high valence of those parameters in the early postburn period. The use of an autocalibrated device enables a very early monitoring of parameters relevant to burn shock survival.

The role of pulse wave analysis indexes for critically ill patients: a narrative review.

OBJECTIVE: Arterial pulse wave analysis (PWA) is now established as a powerful tool to investigate the cardiovascular system, and several clinical studies have shown how PWA can provide valuable prognostic information over and beyond traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Typically these techniques are applied to chronic conditions, such as hypertension or aging, to monitor the slow structural changes of the vascular system which lead to important alterations of the arterial PW. However, their application to acute critical illness is not currently widespread, probably because of the high hemodynamic instability and acute dynamic alterations affecting the cardiovascular system of these patients. APPROACH: In this work we propose a review of the physiological and methodological basis of PWA, describing how it can be used to provide insights into arterial structure and function, cardiovascular biomechanical properties, and to derive information on wave propagation and reflection. The applicability of these techniques to acute critical illness, especially septic shock, is extensively discussed, highlighting the feasibility of their use in acute critical patients and their role in optimizing therapy administration and hemodynamic monitoring. SIGNIFICANCE: The potential for the clinical use of these techniques lies in the ease of computation and availability of arterial blood pressure signals, as invasive arterial lines are commonly used in these patients. We hope that the concepts illustrated in the present review will soon be translated into clinical practice.

Hemodynamic monitoring and echocardiographic evaluation in cardiogenic shock.

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is characterized by the presence of a state of tissue hypoperfusion secondary to ventricular dysfunction. Hemodynamic monitoring allows us to obtain information about cardiovascular pathophysiology that will help us make the diagnosis and guide therapy in CS situations. The most used monitoring system in CS is the pulmonary artery catheter since it provides key hemodynamic variables in CS, such as cardiac output, pulmonary artery pressure, and pulmonary artery occlusion pressure. On the other hand, echocardiography makes it possible to obtain, at the bedside, anatomical and hemodynamic data that complement the information obtained through continuous monitoring devices. CS monitoring can be considered multimodal and integrative by including hemodynamic, metabolic, and echocardiographic parameters that allow describing the characteristics of CS and guiding therapeutic interventions during hemodynamic resuscitation.

From bench to bedside: A review of the application and potential of microcirculatory assessment by hand-held videomicroscopy.

In clinical practice, there is vast knowledge regarding the evaluation of macrocirculatory parameters, such as systemic blood pressure and cardiac output, for the hemodynamic monitoring of patients. However, assessment of the microcirculation has not yet been incorporated into the bedside armamentarium. Hand-held intravital video microscopy enables the direct, noninvasive, evaluation of the sublingual microcirculation at the bedside, offering insights into the status of the systemic microcirculation. It is easily performed and may be employed in several clinical settings, providing immediate results that may help guide patient management. Therefore, the incorporation of hand-held intravital video microscopy into clinical practice may lead to tremendous improvements in the quality of care of critical, unstable patients or offer new data in the evaluation of patients with chronic diseases, especially those with microcirculatory involvement, such as occurs in diabetes.

Midline Catheters as an Alternative for Central Venous Catheters in Venous Oxygen Saturation Monitoring: A Single Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) obtained from a central venous catheter (CVC) is often used to approximate oxygen delivery in critically ill patients. Despite their importance in administering medications and monitoring oxygen delivery, the use of CVCs can be associated with significant complications. Midline catheters are inserted via a peripheral vein above the antecubital fossa and provide a safe alternative to CVCs. This study aimed to determine the equivalence of ScvO2 and midline catheter oxygen saturation (SmO2) in critically ill patients. METHODS: This was a single-center observational study of critically ill adult patients who had concurrently placed CVCs (internal jugular and subclavian) and midline catheters as part of standard ICU care. Venous oxygen saturation and lactate levels were measured from both catheters using the Abbott point-of-care i-STAT analyzer. Demographic and ICU admission data were collected. Continuous variables were compared using the paired t-test. Pearson's correlation was used to evaluate the linear correlation between ScvO2 and SmO2. The systematic error (bias) was calculated using Bland-Altman analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to evaluate the sensitivities and specificities for different values of SmO2 to predict ScvO2. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients (n = 48) were enrolled in the study. The mean ScvO2 and SmO2 were 65.5% +/- 11.2% and 62.7% +/- 17.6% respectively (p = 0.1197). In the Bland-Altman analysis, the mean bias between ScvO2 and SmO2 was 2.8% +/- 12.3% with 95% limits of agreement of -21.3% to 26.9%. More than 60% of the ScvO2 and SmO2 values diverged by ≥ 5%. CONCLUSIONS: The difference between the mean SmO2 and ScvO2 was not statistically significant and the mean bias between SmO2 and ScvO2 is low. Despite this, the substantially large standard deviation and limits of agreement preclude the use of SmO2 as a direct surrogate of ScvO2.

The Use of Pressure Recording Analytical Method in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: The Impact on Clinical Decisions for the Appropriate Postoperative Setting and Cost-effective Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the use of the Pressure Recording Analytical Method (PRAM), an hemodynamic monitoring system, in evaluating intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamic instability in patients undergoing endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm, and to evaluate if the decision to refer patients to a ordinary ward or to a Cardiac Step-Down Unit (CSDU) after the intervention on the basis of intraoperative hemodynamic monitoring could be more cost-effective. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After preoperative clinical evaluation, 44 patients were divided in this non-randomised study into two groups according to their postoperative destination: Group 1-ward (N=22) and Group 2-CSDU (N=22). All patients underwent monitoring with PRAM during the intervention and in the 24 postoperative hours, measuring several indices of myocardial contractility and other hemodynamic variables. RESULTS: According to the variability of two parameters, Stroke Volume Variation and Pulse Pressure Variation, patients were classified as stable or unstable. Unstable patients showed a significant alteration in several hemodynamic indices, in comparison to stable ones. According to the intraoperative monitoring, eight high risk patients could have been sent to an ordinary ward due to their stability, with a reduction in the improper use of CSDU and, consequently, in costs. CONCLUSIONS: Hemodynamic monitoring with PRAM can be useful in these patients, both for intraoperative management and for the choice of the more appropriate postoperative setting, possibly reducing the improper use of CSDU for hemodynamically stable patients who are judged to be at high risk preoperatively, and re-evaluating low surgical risk patients with an unstable intraoperative pattern, with a possible reduction in costs.

Continuous non-invasive vs. invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring during neuroradiological procedure: a comparative, prospective, monocentric, observational study.

BACKGROUND: In the perioperative setting, the most accurate way to continuously measure arterial blood pressure (ABP) is using an arterial catheter. Surrogate methods such as finger cuff have been developed to allow non-invasive measurements and are increasingly used, but need further evaluation. The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy and clinical concordance between two devices for the measurement of ABP during neuroradiological procedure. METHODS: This is a prospective, monocentric, observational study. All consecutive patients undergoing a neuroradiological procedure were eligible. Patients who needed arterial catheter for blood pressure measurement were included. During neuroradiological procedure, ABP (systolic, mean and diatolic blood pressure) was measured with two different technologies: radial artery catheter and Nexfin. Bland-Altman and error grid analyses were performed to evaluate the accuracy and clinical concordance between devices. RESULTS: From March 2022 to November 2022, we included 50 patients, mostly ASA 3 (60%) and required a cerebral embolization (94%) under general anaesthesia (96%). Error grid analysis showed that 99% of non-invasive ABP measures obtained with the Nexfin were located in the risk zone A or B. However, 65.7% of hypertension events and 41% of hypotensive events were respectively not detected by Nexfin. Compared to the artery catheter, a significant relationship was found for SAP (r2 = 0.78) and MAP (r2 = 0.80) with the Nexfin (p < 0.001). Bias and limits of agreement (LOA) were respectively 9.6 mmHg (- 15.6 to 34.8 mmHg) and - 0.8 mmHg (- 17.2 to 15.6 mmHg), for SAP and MAP. CONCLUSIONS: Nexfin is not strictly interchangeable with artery catheter for ABP measuring. Further studies are needed to define its clinical use during neuroradiological procedure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, registration number: NCT05283824.

Effect of Hemodynamic Monitoring Systems on Short-Term Outcomes after Living Donor Liver Transplantation.

Background and Objectives: To evaluate the effects of the pulse index continuous cardiac output and MostCare Pressure Recording Analytical Method hemodynamic monitoring systems on short-term graft and patient outcomes during living donor liver transplantation in adult patients. Materials and Methods: Overall, 163 adult patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation between January 2018 and March 2022 and met the study inclusion criteria were divided into two groups based on the hemodynamic monitoring systems used during surgery: the MostCare Pressure Recording Analytical Method group (n = 73) and the pulse index continuous cardiac output group (n = 90). The groups were compared with respect to preoperative clinicodemographic features (age, sex, body mass index, graft-to-recipient weight ratio, and Model for End-stage Liver Disease score), intraoperative clinical characteristics, and postoperative biochemical parameters (aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, prothrombin time, international normalized ratio, and platelet count). Results: There were no significant between-group differences with respect to recipient age, sex, body mass index, graft-to-recipient weight ratio, Child, Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, ejection fraction, systolic pulmonary artery pressure, surgery time, anhepatic phase, cold ischemia time, warm ischemia time, erythrocyte suspension use, human albumin use, crystalloid use, urine output, hospital stay, and intensive care unit stay. However, there was a significant difference in fresh frozen plasma use (p < 0.001) and platelet use (p = 0.037). Conclusions: The clinical and biochemical outcomes are not significantly different between pulse index continuous cardiac output and MostCare Pressure Recording Analytical Method as hemodynamic monitoring systems in living donor liver transplantation. However, the MostCare Pressure Recording Analytical Method is more economical and minimally invasive.

Detecting elevated left ventricular end diastolic pressure from simultaneously measured femoral pressure waveform and electrocardiogram.

OBJECTIVE: Instantaneous, non-invasive evaluation of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) would have significant value in the diagnosis and treatment of heart failure. A new approach called cardiac triangle mapping (CTM) has been recently proposed, which can provide a non-invasive estimate of LVEDP. We hypothesized that a hybrid machine-learning (ML) method based on CTM can instantaneously identify an elevated LVEDP using simultaneously measured femoral pressure waveform and electrocardiogram (ECG). Approach: We studied 46 patients (Age: 39-90 (66.4±9.9), BMI: 20.2-36.8 (27.6±4.1), 12 females) scheduled for clinical left heart catheterizations or coronary angiograms at USC Keck Medical Center. Exclusion criteria included severe mitral/aortic valve disease; severe carotid stenosis; aortic abnormalities; ventricular paced rhythm; left bundle branch and anterior fascicular blocks; interventricular conduction delay; and atrial fibrillation. Invasive LVEDP and pressure waveforms at the iliac bifurcation were measured using transducer-tipped Millar catheters with simultaneous ECG. LVEDP range was 9.3-40.5 mmHg. LVEDP=18 mmHg was used as cutoff. Random forest classifiers were trained using data from 36 patients and blindly tested on 10 patients. Main Results: Our proposed ML classifier models accurately predict true LVEDP classes using appropriate physics-based features, where the most accurate demonstrates 100.0% (elevated) and 80.0% (normal) success in predicting true LVEDP classes on blind data. Significance: We demonstrated that physics-based ML models can instantaneously classify LVEDP using information from femoral waveforms and ECGs. Although an invasive validation, the required ML inputs can be potentially obtained non-invasively.

Remote Monitoring of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices in Very Elderly Patients: Advantages and Specific Problems.

Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) offer the benefit of remote monitoring and decision making and find particular applications in special populations such as the elderly. Less transportation, reduced costs, prompt diagnosis, a sense of security, and continuous real-time monitoring are the main advantages. On the other hand, less physician-patient interactions and the technology barrier in the elderly pose specific problems in remote monitoring. CIEDs nowadays are abundant and are mostly represented by rhythm control/monitoring devices, whereas hemodynamic remote monitoring devices are gaining popularity and are evolving and becoming refined. Future directions include the involvement of artificial intelligence, yet disparities of availability, lack of follow-up data, and insufficient patient education are still areas to be improved. This review aims to describe the role of CIED in the very elderly and highlight the merits and possible drawbacks.

Bias, trending ability and diagnostic performance of a non-calibrated multi-beat analysis continuous cardiac output monitor to identify fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients.

Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of non-calibrated multi-beat analysis continuous cardiac output (CCOMBA), against calibrated pulse-contour analysis continuous cardiac output (CCOPCA) during a passive leg raise (PLR) and/or a fluid challenge (FC). Design: Observational, single-centre, prospective study. Setting: Tertiary academic medical intensive care unit, Lyon, France. Participants: Adult patients receiving norepinephrine, monitored by CCOPCA, and in which a PLR and/or a FC was indicated. Main outcome measures: CCOMBA and CCOPCA were recorded prior to and during the PLR/FC to evaluate bias and evaluate changes in CCOMBA and CCOPCA (∆%CCOMBA and ∆%CCOPCA). Fluid responsiveness was identified by an increase >15% in calibrated cardiac output after FC, to identify the optimal ∆%CCOMBA threshold during PLR to predict fluid responsiveness. Results: 29 patients (median age 68 [IQR: 57-74]) performed 28 PLR and 16 FC. The bias between methods increased with higher CCOPCA values, with a percentage error of 64% (95%confidence interval: 52%-77%). ∆%CCOMBA adequately tracked changes in ∆%CCOPCA with an angular bias of 2 ± 29°. ∆%CCOMBA during PLR had an AUROC of 0.92 (P < 0.05), with an optimal threshold >14% to predict fluid responsiveness (sensitivity: 0.99, specificity: 0.87). Conclusions: CCOMBA showed a non-constant bias and a percentage error >30% against calibrated CCOPCA, but an adequate ability to track changes in CCOPCA and to predict fluid responsiveness.

Major liver resections, perioperative issues and posthepatectomy liver failure: A comprehensive update for the anesthesiologist.

Significant advances in surgical techniques and relevant medium- and long-term outcomes over the past two decades have led to a substantial expansion in the indications for major liver resections. To support these outstanding results and to reduce perioperative complications, anesthesiologists must address and master key perioperative issues (preoperative assessment, proactive intraoperative anesthesia strategies, and implementation of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery approach). Intensive care unit monitoring immediately following liver surgery remains a subject of active and often unresolved debate. Among postoperative complications, posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) occurs in different grades of severity (A-C) and frequency (9%-30%), and it is the main cause of 90-d postoperative mortality. PHLF, recently redefined with pragmatic clinical criteria and perioperative scores, can be predicted, prevented, or anticipated. This review highlights: (1) The systemic consequences of surgical manipulations anesthesiologists must respond to or prevent, to positively impact PHLF (a proactive approach); and (2) the maximal intensive treatment of PHLF, including artificial options, mainly based, so far, on Acute Liver Failure treatment(s), to buy time waiting for the recovery of the native liver or, when appropriate and in very selected cases, toward liver transplant. Such a clinical context requires a strong commitment to surgeons, anesthesiologists, and intensivists to work together, for a fruitful collaboration in a mandatory clinical continuum.

A comparison of hemodynamic measurement methods during orthotopic liver transplantation: evaluating agreement and trending ability of PiCCO versus pulmonary artery catheter techniques.

BACKGROUND: Significant hemodynamic changes occur during liver transplantation, emphasizing the importance of precious and continuous monitoring of cardiac output, cardiac index, and other parameters. Although the monitoring of cardiac output by pulse indicator continuous cardiac output (PiCCO) was statistically homogeneous compared to the clinical gold standard pulmonary artery catheterization (PAC) in previous studies of liver transplantation, there are fewer statistical methods for the assessment of its conclusions, and a lack of comparisons of other hemodynamic parameters (e.g., SVRI, systemic vascular resistance index). Some studies have also concluded that the agreement between PiCCO and PAC is not good enough. Overall, there are no uniform conclusions regarding the agreement between PiCCO and PAC in previous studies. This study evaluates the agreement and trending ability of relevant hemodynamic parameters obtained with PiCCO compared to the clinical gold standard PAC from multiple perspectives, employing various statistical methods. METHODS: Fifty-two liver transplantation patients were included. Cardiac output (CO), cardiac index (CI), SVRI and stroke volume index (SVI) values were monitored at eight time points using both PiCCO and PAC. The results were analyzed by Bland-Altman analysis, Passing-bablok regression, intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), 4-quadrant plot, polar plot, and trend interchangeability method (TIM). RESULTS: The Bland-Altman analysis revealed high percentage errors for PiCCO: 54.06% for CO, 52.70% for CI, 62.18% for SVRI, and 51.97% for SVI, indicating poor accuracy. While Passing-Bablok plots showed favorable agreement for SVRI overall and during various phases, the agreement for other parameters was less satisfactory. The ICC results confirmed good overall agreement between the two devices across most parameters, except for SVRI during the new liver phase, which showed poor agreement. Additionally, four-quadrant and polar plot analyses indicated that all agreement rate values fell below the clinically acceptable threshold of over 90%, and all angular deviation values exceeded ± 5°, demonstrating that PiCCO is unable to meet the acceptable trends. Using the TIM, the interchangeability rates were found to be quite low: 20% for CO and CI, 16% for SVRI, and 13% for SVI. CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed notable disparities in absolute values of CO, CI, SVRI and SVI between PiCCO and PAC in intraoperative liver transplant settings, notably during the neohepatic phase where errors were particularly pronounced. Consequently, these findings highlight the need for careful consideration of PiCCO's advantages and disadvantages in liver transplantation scenarios, including its multiple parameters (such as the encompassing extravascular lung water index), against its limited correlation with PAC.

Continuous monitoring of left ventricular function in postoperative intensive care patients using artificial intelligence and transesophageal echocardiography.

BACKGROUND: Continuous monitoring of mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE) using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) may improve the evaluation of left ventricular (LV) function in postoperative intensive care patients. We aimed to assess the utility of continuous monitoring of LV function using TEE and artificial intelligence (autoMAPSE) in postoperative intensive care patients. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, we monitored 50 postoperative intensive care patients for 120 min immediately after cardiac surgery. We recorded a set of two-chamber and four-chamber TEE images every five minutes. We defined monitoring feasibility as how often the same wall from the same patient could be reassessed, and categorized monitoring feasibility as excellent if the same LV wall could be reassessed in ≥ 90% of the total recordings. To compare autoMAPSE with manual measurements, we rapidly recorded three sets of repeated images to assess precision (least significant change), bias, and limits of agreement (LOA). To assess the ability to identify changes (trending ability), we compared changes in autoMAPSE with the changes in manual measurements in images obtained during the initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass as well as before and after surgery. RESULTS: Monitoring feasibility was excellent in most patients (88%). Compared with manual measurements, autoMAPSE was more precise (least significant change 2.2 vs 3.1 mm, P < 0.001), had low bias (0.4 mm), and acceptable agreement (LOA - 2.7 to 3.5 mm). AutoMAPSE had excellent trending ability, as its measurements changed in the same direction as manual measurements (concordance rate 96%). CONCLUSION: Continuous monitoring of LV function was feasible using autoMAPSE. Compared with manual measurements, autoMAPSE had excellent trending ability, low bias, acceptable agreement, and was more precise.

Continuous Right Ventricular Pressure Monitoring in Cardiac Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction in cardiac surgery can lead to RV failure, which is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Abnormal RV function can be identified using RV pressure monitoring. The primary objective of the study is to determine the proportion of patients with abnormal RV early to end-diastole diastolic pressure gradient (RVDPG) and abnormal RV end-diastolic pressure (RVEDP) before initiation and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) separation. The secondary objective is to evaluate if RVDPG before CPB initiation is associated with difficult and complex separation from CPB, RV dysfunction, and failure at the end of cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Tertiary care cardiac institute. PARTICIPANTS: Cardiac surgical patients. INTERVENTION: Cardiac surgery. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Automated electronic quantification of RVDPG and RVEDP were obtained. Hemodynamic measurements were correlated with cardiac and extracardiac parameters from transesophageal echocardiography and postoperative complications. Abnormal RVDPG was present in 80% of the patients (n = 105) at baseline, with a mean RVEDP of 14.2 ± 3.9 mmHg. Patients experienced an RVDPG > 4 mmHg for a median duration of 50.2% of the intraoperative period before CPB initiation and 60.6% after CPB separation. A total of 46 (43.8%) patients had difficult/complex separation from CPB, 18 (38.3%) patients had RV dysfunction, and 8 (17%) had RV failure. Abnormal RVDPG before CPB was not associated with postoperative outcome. CONCLUSION: Elevated RVDPG and RVEDP are common in cardiac surgery. RVDPG and RVEDP before CPB initiation are not associated with RV dysfunction and failure but can be used to diagnose them.

The Use of Pulmonary Artery Catheters and Echocardiography in the Cardiac Surgery Setting: A Nationwide Italian Survey.

OBJECTIVE: Wide variations exist in the use of pulmonary artery catheters (PACs) and echocardiography in the field of cardiac surgery. DESIGN: A national survey promoted by the Italian Association of Cardio-Thoracic Anesthesiologists and Intensive Care was conducted. SETTING: The study occurred in Italian cardiac surgery centers (n = 71). PARTICIPANTS: Anesthesiologists-intensivists were enrolled. INTERVENTIONS: Anonymous questionnaires were used to investigate the use of PACs and echocardiography in the operating room (OR) and intensive care unit (ICU). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 257 respondents (32.2% response rate) from 59 centers (83.1% response rate) participated. Use of PACs seems less common in ORs (median insertion in 20% [5-70] of patients), with slightly higher use in ICUs; in about half of cases, it was the continuous cardiac output monitoring system of choice. Almost two-thirds of respondents recently inserted at least one PAC within a few hours of ICU admission, despite its need being largely preoperatively predictable. Protocols regulating PAC insertion were reported by 25.3% and 28% of respondents (OR and ICU, respectively). Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was performed intraoperatively in >75% of patients by 86.4% of respondents; only 23.7% stated that intraoperative TEE relied on anesthesiologists. Tissue Doppler and/or 3D imaging were widely available (87.4% and 82%, respectively), but only 37.8% and 24.3% of respondents self-declared skills in these modalities, respectively; 77.1% of respondents had no echocardiography certification, nor were pursuing certification (various reasons); 40.9% had not attended recent echocardiography courses. Lower PAC use was associated with university hospitals (OR: p = 0.014, ICU: p = 0.032) and with lower interventions/year (OR: p = 0.023). Higher independence in performing TEE was reported in university hospitals (OR: p < 0.001; ICU: p = 0.006), centers with higher interventions/year (OR: p = 0.019), and by respondents with less experience in cardiology (ICU: p = 0.046). CONCLUSION: Variability in the use of PACs and echocardiography was found. Protocols regulating the use of PACs seem infrequent. University centers use PACs less and have greater skills in TEE. Training and certifications in echocardiography should be encouraged.

Management of anesthesia for procedures in the cardiac electrophysiology laboratory.

The complexity of cardiac electrophysiology procedures has increased significantly during the past 3 decades. Anesthesia requirements of these procedures can differ on the basis of patient- and procedure-specific factors. This manuscript outlines various anesthesia strategies for cardiac implantable electronic devices and electrophysiology procedures, including preprocedural, procedural, and postprocedural management. A team-based approach with collaboration between cardiac electrophysiologists and anesthesiologists is required with careful preprocedural and intraprocedural planning. Given the recent advances in electrophysiology, there is a need for specialized cardiac electrophysiology anesthesia care to improve the efficacy and safety of the procedures.

Point-of-Care Bedside Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is Safe in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Patients With Swan Ganz Catheters: A Phantom Experiment and Single Center Experience.

INTRODUCTION: More than 1.2 million pulmonary artery catheters (PACs) are used in cardiac patients per annum within the United States. However, it is contraindicated in traditional 1.5 and 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. We aimed to test preclinical and clinical safety of using this imaging modality given the potential utility of needing it in the clinical setting. METHODS: We conducted two phantom experiments to ensure that the electromagnetic field power deposition associated with bare and jacketed PACs was safe and within the acceptable limit established by the Food and Drug Administration. The primary end points were the safety and feasibility of performing Point-of-Care (POC) MRI without imaging-related adverse events. We performed a preclinical computational electromagnetic simulation and evaluated these findings in nine patients with PACs on veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. RESULTS: The phantom experiments showed that the baseline point specific absorption rate through the head averaged 0.4 W/kg. In both the bare and jacketed catheters, the highest net specific absorption rates were at the neck entry point and tip but were negligible and unlikely to cause any heat-related tissue or catheter damage. In nine patients (median age 66, interquartile range 42-72 y) with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation due to cardiogenic shock and PACs placed for close hemodynamic monitoring, POC MRI was safe and feasible with good diagnostic imaging quality. CONCLUSIONS: Adult ECMO patients with PACs can safely undergo point-of-care low-field (64 mT) brain MRI within a reasonable timeframe in an intensive care unit setting to assess for acute brain injury that might otherwise be missed with conventional head computed tomography.

Feasibility of continuous non-invasive delivery of oxygen monitoring in cardiac surgical patients: a proof-of-concept preliminary study.

PURPOSE: Oxygen delivery (DO2) and its monitoring are highlighted to aid postoperative goal directed therapy (GDT) to improve perioperative outcomes such as acute kidney injury (AKI) after high-risk cardiac surgeries associated with multiple morbidities and mortality. However, DO2 monitoring is neither routine nor done postoperatively, and current methods are invasive and only produce intermittent DO2 trends. Hence, we proposed a novel algorithm that simultaneously integrates cardiac output (CO), hemoglobin (Hb) and oxygen saturation (SpO2) from the Edwards Life Sciences ClearSight System® and Masimo SET Pulse CO-Oximetry® to produce a continuous, real-time DO2 trend. METHODS: Our algorithm was built systematically with 4 components - machine interface to draw data with PuTTY, data extraction with parsing, data synchronization, and real-time DO2 presentation using a graphic-user interface. Hb readings were validated. RESULTS: Our algorithm was implemented successfully in 93% (n = 57 out of 61) of our recruited cardiac surgical patients. DO2 trends and AKI were studied. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated a novel proof-of-concept and feasibility of continuous, real-time, non-invasive DO2 monitoring, with each patient serving as their own control. Our study also lays the foundation for future investigations aimed at identifying personalized critical DO2 thresholds and optimizing DO2 as an integral part of GDT to enhance outcomes in perioperative cardiac surgery.

Invasive Implanted Hemodynamic Monitoring in Patients With Complex Congenital Heart Disease: State-of-the-Art Review.

As the number of patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) continues to increase, the burden of heart failure (HF) in this population requires innovative strategies to individualize management. Given the success of implanted invasive hemodynamic monitoring (IHM) with the CardioMEMSTM HF system in adults with acquired HF, this is often suggested for use in patients with CHD, though published data are limited to case reports and case series. Therefore, this review summarizes the available published reports on the use of IHM in patients with complex CHD, describes novel applications, and highlights future directions for study. In patients with CHD, IHM has been used across the lifespan, from age 3 years to adulthood, with minimal device-related complications reported. IHM uses include (1) prevention of HF hospitalizations; (2) reassessment of hemodynamics after titration of medical therapy without repeated cardiac catheterization; (3) serial monitoring of at-risk patients for pulmonary hypertension to optimize timing of heart transplant referral; (4) and hemodynamic assessment with exercise (5) or after ventricular assist device placement. IHM has the potential to reduce the number of cardiac catheterizations in anatomically complex patients and, in patients with Fontan circulation, IHM pressures may have prognostic implications. In conclusion, though further studies are needed, as patients with CHD age and HF is more prevalent, this tool may assist CHD physicians in caring for this complex patient population.