Liver transplantation following two conversions in a patient with huge hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein invasion: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection and liver transplantation (LT) are the most effective curative options for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, few patients with huge HCC (> 10 cm in diameter), especially those with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT), can receive these treatments. Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) can be used as a conversion therapy for them because it has the dual benefit of shrinking tumors and increasing residual hepatic volume. However, in patients with huge HCC, high lung absorbed dose often prevents them from receiving SIRT. CASE SUMMARY: A 35-year-old man was admitted because of emaciation and pain in the hepatic region for about 1 month. The computed tomography scan showed a 20.2 cm × 19.8 cm tumor located in the right lobe-left medial lobes with right portal vein and right hepatic vein invasion. After the pathological type of HCC was confirmed by biopsy, two conversions were presented. The first one was drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and lenvatinib and sintilimab, converted to SIRT, and the second one was sequential SIRT with continued systemic treatment. The tumor size significantly decreased from 20.2 cm × 19.8 cm to 16.2 cm × 13.8 cm, then sequentially to 7.8 cm × 6.8 cm. In the meantime, the ratio of spared volume to total liver volume increased gradually from 34.4% to 55.7%, then to 62.9%. Furthermore, there was visualization of the portal vein, indicating regression of the tumor thrombus. Finally, owing to the new tumor in the left lateral lobe, the patient underwent LT instead of resection without major complications. CONCLUSION: Patients with inoperable huge HCC with PVTT could be converted to SIRT first and accept surgery sequentially.

Efficacy and safety of HAIC-FOLFOX plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors as first-line treatment for unresectable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been treated with targeted therapy, immunotherapy, or a combination of both, however, the overall clinical efficacy is still unsatisfactory. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC), as a localized treatment modality, has demonstrated favorable therapeutic efficacy in patients with advanced HCC accompanied by portal vein tumor thrombus and extensive intrahepatic metastasis. In recent years, the combination of HAIC with immune and targeted therapy has gradually gained acceptance in East Asian countries. However, further investigation is necessary to assess the efficacy and safety of this triple therapy. METHOD: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for studies conducted within the past 5 years on HAIC combined with immunotherapy and targeted therapy as first-line treatment for advanced HCC. According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we conducted this meta-analysis. Additionally, the quality of included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) scale. Outcomes such as overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs)were extracted and pooled from eligible studies. RESULT: Twelve studies involving 1072 patients were enrolled in this meta-analysis. In terms of tumor response, the pooled ORR and DCR were 65.7% (95% CI, 58.7%-72.7%) (I2 = 83%, P = 0.000) and 89.2% (95% CI, 83.9%-93.6%) (I2 = 83%, P = 0.000), respectively. When analyzing PFS, the upper limit of 95% confidence interval of PFS in one study was not reached, which could potentially impact the statistical analysis. Therefore, we analyzed the remaining 11 studies a total of 1019 patients to pool mPFS, ultimately the pooled mPFS was 9.77months (95% CI, 7.73-11.80) (I2 = 93.9%, P = 0.000). Follow-up time in some studies was insufficient, only eight studies reported OS, we systematically analyzed these eight studies and extracted the pooled mOS was 16.65 months (95% CI, 14.17-19.14) (I2 = 76.9%, P = 0.000). In terms of safety, the incidence rates of any grade AEs, ranked from high to low, were as follows: aminotransferase increased (61.3%), nausea and vomiting (40.5%), hypertension (37.8%), thrombocytopenia (37.4%), hyperbilirubinemia (36.7%), abdominal pain (35.6%), leukopenia (34.6%), hypothyroidism (19.0%), rash (14.4%). Grade 3-4 AEs ranked from high to low were as follows: aminotransferase increased (10.8%), thrombocytopenia (7.9%), hypertension (7.4%), leukopenia (5.0%). No treatment-related deaths occurred, patients receiving this triple therapy demonstrated favorable tolerability. CONCLUSION: The combination of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors as a first-line therapy for unresectable advanced HCC demonstrates promising therapeutic efficacy and favorable safety.

Efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with fruquintinib and tislelizumab for patients with microsatellite stable colorectal cancer liver metastasis following failure of multiple-line therapy.

Background and aim: The prognosis of microsatellite stable (MSS)-colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRCLM) following failure of multi-line therapy remains dismal. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) plus fruquintinib and tislelizumab (HAIC-F-T treatment) for MSS-CRCLM which failed from multiple-line therapy. Methods: From February 2021 to June 2023, 45 patients with MSS-CRCLM after failure of multiple-line therapy who received HAIC combined with fruquintinib and tislelizumab (HAIC-F-T triple treatment) were enrolled. The combination therapy included HAIC regimens with oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil or irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and 5-fluorouracil on days 1-2, intravenous tislelizumab (200 mg) before HAIC on day 1, and oral fruquintinb (3 mg/d) on day 3-21, every 4 weeks. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: The follow-up ended on June 22, 2024, with a median follow-up time of 17.5 months. The objective response rate was 42.2%, and the disease control rate was 82.2%. The median OS was 15.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI]:12.634-17.966), and the median PFS was 7.5 months (95% CI:5.318-9.682). The independent risk factors related to worse OS were previous PD-1 immunotherapy (P = 0.021) and the number of HAIC-F-T triple treatment cycles of ≤ 2 (P = 0.007). The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) was 20%, with the most frequent grade 3 or higher AEs being abdominal pain (3/45, 6.7%). Conclusion: HAIC combined with fruquintinib and tislelizumab may be an alternative salvage treatment for patients with MSS-CRCLM following failure of multiple-line therapy.

Response to hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with camrelizumab and targeted therapy in advanced primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: a case report and literature review.

Background: Primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (PHNEC), which often lacks distinctive radiological features or specific clinical symptoms, is extremely rare. In this report, we describe a rare case of PHNEC that was successfully treated with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with camrelizumab and targeted therapy. Case Description: This report describes the treatment of a 53-year-old male with PHNEC in China. The patient was admitted for persistent upper right quadrant abdominal pain. Dynamic contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) both detected multiple masses, enlarged portal lymph nodes, and retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Histological and immunohistochemistry of the largest mass biopsy specimen from the right liver lobe confirmed the neuroendocrine tumor of the liver. The patient underwent HAIC with a modified fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX) regimen. Meanwhile, the patient received camrelizumab (200 mg, intravenously, q3w) apatinib (250 mg, oral, daily) within 7 days after the start of HAIC. CT and MRI showed a marked decrease in the size of the largest mass of the liver and the portal lymph nodes, indicating a partial response of the tumor. Conclusions: PHNEC is a very rare tumor, and the treatment for its advanced type is controversial and remains to be standardized. HAIC combined with camrelizumab and targeted therapy may be an effective and safe therapeutic option for patients with PHNEC.

Oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy with hepatic arterial versus intravenous infusion in metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Oxaliplatin, a major drug in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), is responsible for cumulative, dose-limiting peripheral neuropathy (PN). Whether the hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) route can limit oxaliplatin-induced PN in comparison with the intravenous (IV) route has not been specifically explored so far. METHODS: We compared the frequency and severity of PN in oxaliplatin-naive patients with mCRC included in trials that evaluated treatment with oxaliplatin administered either by HAI (ACCORD 04, CHOICE, OSCAR, and PACHA-01 trials) or by IV route (FFCD 2000-05 trial). We retrieved anonymized, prospectively collected data from trial databases for the ACCORD 04, CHOICE, and FFCD 2000-05 trials and through a review of Gustave Roussy patients' electronic medical records for PACHA-01 and OSCAR trials. The primary endpoint was the incidence of clinically significant PN (grades 2 to 4) according to the cumulative dose of oxaliplatin received. Secondary endpoints were time to onset of neuropathy as a function of the cumulative dose of oxaliplatin, discontinuation of oxaliplatin for neurotoxicity, and safety. RESULTS: A total of 363 patients were included (IV, 300; HAI, 63). In total, 180 patients in the IV group (60%) and 30 patients in the HAI group (48%) developed clinically significant PN, with no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.23). No difference was shown in the time to onset of PN either (p = 0.23). CONCLUSION: The administration of oxaliplatin HAI rather than IV in the treatment of mCRC does not reduce the incidence, precocity, and severity of PN.

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy enhances the efficacy of lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitors in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with tumor thrombosis in the inferior vena cava and/or right atrium.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with invasion into the inferior vena cava (IVC) or the right atrium (RA) presents significant therapeutic challenges due to its rapid progression and limited available treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated the effectiveness of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy alongside lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors (HAIC-Len-PD1) compared to treatment with only lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors (Len-PD1). A total of 115 patients with HCC and IVC or RA invasion were included. We analyzed groups for median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) through the Kaplan-Meier method, along with tumor response rates, disease control rates, and adverse event frequencies. RESULTS: The HAIC-Len-PD1 treatment showed a marked improvement in median OS (22.2 vs. 14.4 months; P = 0.007) and median PFS (13.8 vs. 5.1 months; P = 0.001) over the Len-PD1 regimen. There was also a higher overall response rate (68.7% vs. 37.5%; P < 0.05) and disease control rate (92.5% vs. 75%; P < 0.05) observed in the HAIC-Len-PD1 group. A subgroup analysis demonstrated consistent survival benefits across diverse patient demographics. Although the incidence of adverse events was higher in the HAIC-Len-PD1 group, these were generally manageable and well-tolerated. CONCLUSION: The combined regimen of HAIC, lenvatinib, and PD-1 inhibitors may improve survival and tumor management in HCC patients with IVC or RA invasion, suggesting a potential therapeutic option for this critically at-risk group. Further research in the form of randomized controlled trials are needed to verify these findings for advanced-stage HCC with vascular compromise.

Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Combined Lenvatinib and PD-1 Inhibitor Showed Improved Survival for Infiltrative Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

Purpose: Lenvatinib and programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor on infiltrative hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have obtained demonstrated efficacy and still need improvement. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has shown promising results for advanced HCC. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of HAIC combined Lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor versus Lenvatinib combined PD-1 inhibitor for infiltrative HCC. Patients and Methods: A total of 232 patients were enrolled. There were 114 patients received Lenvatinib combined PD-1 inhibitor (Len+PD-1 group) and 118 patients received HAIC combined Lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor (HAIC+Len+PD-1 group). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and safety of patients were compared between the two groups by propensity score-matching (PSM). Results: The 6-, 12-, and 24-month OS rates were 93.8%, 65.1% and 13.4% in Len+PD-1 group, and 100%, 77.3% and 32.1% in HAIC+Len+PD-1 group, respectively. The 3-, 6-, and 12-month PFS rates were 86.4%, 45.7% and 14.1% in Len+PD-1 group, and 95.1%, 59.3% and 25.9% in HAIC+Len+PD-1 group, respectively. The HAIC+Len+PD-1 group had obviously better survival than the Len+PD-1 group both in OS (P=0.002) and PFS (P=0.004). Subgroup analysis revealed that OS in patients with metastasis was improved with HAIC+Len+PD-1 treatment. Patients with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) response after treatment showed better survival than the non-response. In addition, HAIC+Len+PD-1 group showed manageable adverse events (AEs). Conclusion: Patient with infiltrative HCC, HAIC+Len+PD-1 treatment had longer OS and PFS than Len+PD-1 treatment. Early AFP response was an effective indicator of better survival and tumor response to therapy.

Infiltrative hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an odd group that is not well adjudicated in the current staging systems, and treatment options for patients with infiltrative HCC are challenging with scant and insufficient clinical evidence. In this multi-center study, we innovatively analyzed the outcome of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor (HAIC+Len+PD-1) was associated longer progression-free survival and overall survival than Lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitor combination (Len+PD-1) for patient with infiltrative HCC. In addition, further intragroup analysis revealed that OS of patients with and without metastasis in Len+PD-1 group was significant difference. However, no difference was observed in OS for patients with and without metastasis in HAIC+Len+PD-1 group. Patients with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) response after treatment showed better survival than the non-response. Our research provides evidence that HAIC combined Lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor results in clinically significant improvements in infiltrative HCC. It could be recommended as a first choice for infiltrative HCC therapy.

Efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in patients with primary liver cancer with portal vein tumor thrombosis: a comparative analysis of different perfusion chemotherapeutic regimens.

BACKGROUND: Portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) commonly occurs in patients with primary liver cancer (PLC). Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a treatment for patients with PLC and PVTT. Some studies have shown that combining TACE therapy with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) might improve the survival rate of PLC patients with PVTT. However, few studies have compared the different regimens of PLC with PVTT. We aimed to compare the differences between the oxaliplatin + raltetrexed regimen and FOLFOX regimen. METHODS: We divided the 248 patients into two groups. There were 60 patients in the oxaliplatin + ratitetrexed group and 74 patients in the FOLFOX group. The primary endpoints were OS and PFS. The secondary endpoints were ORR and adverse events. We used SPSS software, the Kaplan-Meier method, the t test, and the rank sum test to compare the differences between the two groups. RESULTS: The median OS was 10.82 months in the oxaliplatin + raltitrexed group and 8.67 months in the FOLFOX group. The median PFS time was greater in the oxaliplatin + raltitrexed group (10.0 months) than that in the FOLFOX group (7.1 months). The ORR was greater in the oxaliplatin + raltitrexed group than that in the FOLFOX group (18.3% vs. 13.5%; P = 0.445). The DCR in the oxaliplatin + raltitrexed group was higher than that in the FOLFOX group (70.0% vs. 64.8%; P = 0.529). However, in the subgroup analysis, the difference between them was more significant in the type II PVTT subgroup. The OS was 12.08 months in the oxaliplatin + raltitrexed group and 7.26 months in the FOLFOX group (P = 0.008). The PFS was 11.68 months in the oxaliplatin + raltitrexed group and 6.26 months in the FOLFOX group (P = 0.014). In the right branch of type II PVTT, the OS was 13.54 months in the oxaliplatin + raltitrexed group and 6.89 months in the FOLFOX group (P = 0.015), and the PFS was 13.35 months in the oxaliplatin + raltitrexed group and 6.27 months in the FOLFOX group (P = 0.030). The incidence of adverse reactions was similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the FOLFOX regimen, the oxaliplatin + raltitrexed chemoembolization regimen had longer OS, PFS time and ORR and DCR and it was safe and tolerable.

Analysis of complications of giant gastric ulcers induced by hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy or combined immunotherapy: A report of three cases.

Primary liver cancer is a major public health issue in China, with high incidence and mortality rates. Notably, progress has been made in improving the surgical methods and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) regimens of liver cancer and the combination of HAIC with immunotherapy is expected to further increase the surgical conversion rate or objective response rate. However, patients with liver cancer often have underlying cirrhosis, which may lead to complications, such as esophageal varices and high-pressure gastric diseases. The present study describes three cases of giant gastric ulcers that occurred during the process of HAIC or combined immunotherapy. Notably, the causal relationship between HAIC and immunotherapy is unclear. In patients with tumors receiving immunotherapy, gastrointestinal adverse reactions are common, and some may develop serious complications, such as gastrointestinal perforation. The present study provides a detailed analysis of this issue and emphasizes the need for further clarification of its mechanisms and effective treatment methods.

Hepatic arterial infusion of GEMOX plus systemic gemcitabine chemotherapy combined with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor in large unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) plus systemic gemcitabine chemotherapy (GEM-SYS) in combination with lenvatinib and programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor for patients with large unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (uICC). METHODS: From November 2019 to December 2022, 21 large uICC patients who underwent GEMOX-HAIC (Day 1) and GEM-SYS (Day 8) (3w/cycle) combined with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor were retrospectively enrolled. Local tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were analyzed. Tumor response was assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. AEs were evaluated by the common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 5.0. RESULTS: After a median follow-up duration of 16.0 months (range 5-43.5 months), 17 patients had died. The median OS was 19.5 months (range 9-43.5 months), and the median PFS was 6.0 months (range 2.5-38.5 months). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 71.4 %, 42.9 %, and 19.0 %, respectively. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year PFS rates were 33.3 %, 19.0 %, and 9.5 %, respectively. Complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease were observed in 0 (0 %), 11 (52.3 %), 5 (23.8 %), and 5 (23.8 %) patients, respectively. The disease control rate and objective response rate were 76.1 % and 52.3 %, respectively. None of the enrolled patients experienced grade 5 AEs. CONCLUSIONS: GEMOX-HAIC plus GEM-SYS in combination with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor was effective and well tolerated for patients with large uICC.

Efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with donafenib in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at ascertaining the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with donafenib versus HAIC alone in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Seventy HCC patients were enrolled for our study, and they were randomized by simple randomization using computer-generated random numbers into two groups: control group and observation group. Regular follow-up reviews were conducted to assess the efficacy of treatments. The levels of apoptotic factors, the levels of hepatic fibrosis indices, the levels of serum tumor vascular factors and tumor markers, and the occurrence of adverse reactions in the two groups were recorded and compared. RESULTS: Disease control rate, objective response rate, and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients in the observation group were higher in contrast to the control group. After 12 weeks of treatment, lower mRNA expression of c-mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor, telomerase, and Fas Ligand and higher mRNA expression of Fas and Caspase-3 were observed in HCC tissues of the observation group versus the control group (p < 0.05); lower detection values of serum laminin, hyaluronic acid, collage type IV, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, and alpha-fetal protein (AFP) were noted in HCC patients of the observation group in comparison to the control group (p < 0.05); there was no difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Donafenib combined with HAIC in the treatment of unresectable HCC patients can notably reduce serum AFP levels, improve hepatic fibrosis, enhance short-term efficacy, prolong PFS, and have a favorable safety profile.

Addition of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Showed Better Efficacy for Infiltrative Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy and Lenvatinib: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Purpose: The prognosis of infiltrative hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is dismal. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) plus Lenvatinib (Len) and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) have shown promising results for HCC. However, this three combination therapy on infiltrative HCC is unknown. In this study, we compared HAIC plus lenvatinib (Len) and programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor with HAIC plus Len for infiltrative HCC. Patients and Methods: This multi-center cohort study included patients with infiltrative HCC who received HAIC combined with Len (HAIC+Len group, n = 173) or HAIC combined with Len and PD-1 inhibitor (HAIC+Len+ICI group, n = 128) as the first-line treatment from January 2019 to December 2021. To balance any intergroup differences, one-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) was applied. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between the two groups. Results: After PSM, the median OS was 14.1 ± 1.0 and 16.1 ± 1.4 months in the HAIC+Len and HAIC+Len+ICI groups, respectively. The median PFS was 4.6 ± 0.4 months in the HAIC+Len group and 7.5 ± 0.8 months in the HAIC+Len+ICI group. The HAIC+Len+ICI group showed significantly better OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49-0.90; P = 0.008) and PFS (HR, 0.53; 95% confident index [CI], 0.40-0.70; P < 0.001) compared with the HAIC+Len group. Subgroup analysis revealed that for OS in HCC without metastasis, the addition of PD-1 inhibitor was not significant (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.43-1.07; P = 0.091). No difference was observed in OS between low (2-3 cycles) and high (4-6 cycles) level of HAIC cycles (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.67-1.44; P = 0.938). Conclusion: The HAIC+Len+ICI group had a longer PFS and OS compared with the HAIC+Len group, demonstrating an acceptable safety profile. This triple combination strategy may be an alternative treatment for infiltrative HCC management.

The evidence of HAIC plus Len and PD-1 inhibitors for infiltrative HCC is limited. There was no study to evaluate the efficacy of HAIC combined with Len and PD-1 inhibitors for infiltrative HCC. In this study, we found that HAIC plus Len and PD-1 inhibitor (HAIC+Len+ICI) was associated with longer progression-free survival and overall survival than HAIC plus Len combination (HAIC+Len) for patient with infiltrative HCC. In addition, OS in patients with metastasis was improved with HAIC+Len+ICI treatment. OS in patients without metastasis, addition of PD-1 inhibitor after HAIC and Len was not beneficial. What's more, three cycles of HAIC are adequate, especially for patients with high tumor burden, especially with main branch portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). Our research provides new evidence that HAIC+Len+ICI treatment significantly improved the OS and PFS of infiltrative HCC patients compared with those who received HAIC+Len treatment. It provides a strong reference for clinical treatment.

Combination Therapy of Lenvatinib and Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Using Cisplatin With Lipiodol and 5-Fluorouracil: A Potential Breakthrough Therapy for Unresectable Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: In 2021, the LEOPARD trial reported that the combination of lenvatinib+one-shot cisplatin infusion might contribute to improving the results of conventional advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment. Thus, combination therapy with lenvatinib and catheterization has emerged as a focal point in treating advanced HCC. Conversely, the New FP regimen consists of low-dose cisplatin (CDDP) combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and lipiodol via hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC), with a high response rate of approximately 70%. Therefore, lenvatinib+New FP (LEN-New FP) may be a more promising treatment for HCC. Here, we report six patients who were administered LEN+New FP and achieved high therapeutic efficacy. Among them, one case had an interesting clinical course, which has been described in detail. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included six patients who were administered 12 mg or 8 mg of lenvatinib once daily based on a body weight of ≥60 kg or <60 kg, respectively, along with 50 mg of cisplatin in 5-10 mL lipiodol, and a continuous infusion of 5-FU (1500 mg/5 days) infused every 2-4 weeks. Tumor evaluations were performed 4-8 weeks after the initiation of New FP administration and every 8-12 weeks thereafter. RESULTS: The median patient age was 65 years. All patients had a history of prior treatment with atezolizumab and bevacizumab and one of the factors associated with poor overall survival for New FP monotherapy, such as a maximum tumor diameter ≥7 cm and bilobular multifocal distribution. Four (67%) patients had severe vascular invasion. The best objective response and disease control rates were 83% and 100%, respectively. The best response of the target lesion was complete remission in four out of six patients. CONCLUSION: The LEN-New FP combination for advanced HCC showed a high response rate and was more effective in high-risk patients with factors associated with poor overall survival than that reported with conventional New FP monotherapy. Additionally, LEN-New FP exhibited extremely high objective response and disease control rates and was well tolerated, including in cases where it was considered second- or third-line systemic chemotherapy for advanced HCC. Thus, LEN-New FP can serve as a breakthrough therapy for advanced HCC based on appropriate case selection.

Efficacy and safety of HAIC combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors versus HAIC monotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter propensity score matching analysis.

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of the combined approach involving hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients and methods: In this multicenter retrospective study conducted from January 2020 to December 2023, we reviewed advanced HCC patients who were treated either with HAIC alone or with a combination of HAIC and TKIs. To address initial disparities between the two groups, we employed propensity score matching (PSM). Tumor response evaluation was performed following RECIST 1.1 criteria. We compared survival outcomes, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR), between the two treatment groups. Safety assessments were conducted for all patients. Results: Following the eligibility review, 138 patients underwent combined treatment with HAIC and TKIs (HT group), while 198 patients received HAIC monotherapy (HA group) and met the inclusion criteria for enrollment in this study. After PSM, 107 patients were assigned to each group. The HT group exhibited a longer median OS (18.0 versus 8.8 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.52, p < 0.001) compared to the HA group. Median PFS was also longer in the HT group, although without statistical significance (6.0 versus 4.7 months; HR, 0.85, p = 0.265). The HT group demonstrated a higher ORR (41.1% versus 25.2%; p = 0.020). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in the incidence of all adverse events (AEs) or grade 3/4 AEs (any grade: 81.2% for HT versus 78.8% for HA, p = 0.68; grade 3/4: 18.1% for HT versus 13.6% for HA, p = 0.29). Importantly, all AEs were manageable and acceptable. Notably, no grade 5 AEs occurred in either group. Conclusion: Combination therapy involving HAIC and TKIs effectively prolonged survival in advanced HCC patients. It represented a preferable alternative to HAIC monotherapy, with manageable safety.

Effect of lidocaine pumped through hepatic artery to relieve pain of hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy.

Background: This study aims to explore the analgesic effect of lidocaine administered through the hepatic artery during hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: A total of 45 HCC patients were randomly divided into a study group and a control group. Both groups received oxaliplatin (OXA) based FOLFOX protocol via electronic infusion pump. The study group was continuously infused with 100 mg of lidocaine during HAIC, while 5% glucose solution was infused in the same way as described above. Changes in vital signs, visual analogue score (VAS) and general comfort score (GCQ scale) were recorded before surgery (Time point 0), at the end of infusion (Time point 01), 1 h after HAIC (Time point 02), 3 h after HAIC (Time point 03) and 6 h after HAIC (Time point 04). Results: At each point of time from Time point 0 through Time point 04, the differences in MAP, RR and SPO2 between the two groups were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). At each point of time from Time point 01 through Time point 04, the mean VAS scores in the study group were smaller and GCQ scores were higher than those in the control group, and the differences were both statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Lidocaine infusion through the hepatic artery during HAIC effectively reduces intraoperative and postoperative pain and improves patient satisfaction with pain management, making it a valuable technique for clinical practice.

Camrelizumab, apatinib and hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy combined with microwave ablation for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and camrelizumab plus apatinib (TRIPLET protocol) is promising for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (Ad-HCC). However, the usefulness of microwave ablation (MWA) after TRIPLET is still controversial. AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of TRIPLET alone (T-A) vs TRIPLET-MWA (T-M) for Ad-HCC. METHODS: From January 2018 to March 2022, 217 Ad-HCC patients were retrospectively enrolled. Among them, 122 were included in the T-A group, and 95 were included in the T-M group. A propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance bias. Overall survival (OS) was compared using the Kaplan-Meier curve with the log-rank test. The overall objective response rate (ORR) and major complications were also assessed. RESULTS: After PSM, 82 patients were included both the T-A group and the T-M group. The ORR (85.4%) in the T-M group was significantly higher than that (65.9%) in the T-A group (P < 0.001). The cumulative 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 98.7%, 93.4%, and 82.0% in the T-M group and 85.1%, 63.1%, and 55.0% in the T-A group (hazard ratio = 0.22; 95% confidence interval: 0.10-0.49; P < 0.001). The incidence of major complications was 4.9% (6/122) in the T-A group and 5.3% (5/95) in the T-M group, which were not significantly different (P = 1.000). CONCLUSION: T-M can provide better survival outcomes and comparable safety for Ad-HCC than T-A.

Efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and its combination strategies for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: With the rapid progress of systematic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), therapeutic strategies combining hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with systematic therapy arised increasing concentrations. However, there have been no systematic review comparing HAIC and its combination strategies in the first-line treatment for advanced HCC. AIM: To investigate the efficacy and safety of HAIC and its combination therapies for advanced HCC. METHODS: A network meta-analysis was performed by including 9 randomized controlled trails and 35 cohort studies to carry out our study. The outcomes of interest comprised overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response and adverse events. Hazard ratios (HR) and odds ratios (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated and agents were ranked based on their ranking probability. RESULTS: HAIC outperformed Sorafenib (HR = 0.55, 95%CI: 0.42-0.72; HR = 0.51, 95%CI: 0.33-0.78; OR = 2.86, 95%CI: 1.37-5.98; OR = 5.45, 95%CI: 3.57-8.30; OR = 7.15, 95%CI: 4.06-12.58; OR = 2.89, 95%CI: 1.99-4.19; OR = 0.48, 95%CI: 0.25-0.92, respectively) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) (HR = 0.50, 95%CI: 0.33-0.75; HR = 0.62, 95%CI: 0.39-0.98; OR = 3.08, 95%CI: 1.36-6.98; OR = 2.07, 95%CI: 1.54-2.80; OR = 3.16, 95%CI: 1.71-5.85; OR = 2.67, 95%CI: 1.59-4.50; OR = 0.16, 95%CI: 0.05-0.54, respectively) in terms of efficacy and safety. HAIC + lenvatinib + ablation, HAIC + ablation, HAIC + anti- programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), and HAIC + radiotherapy had the higher likelihood of providing better OS and PFS outcomes compared to HAIC alone. HAIC + TACE + S-1, HAIC + lenvatinib, HAIC + PD-1, HAIC + TACE, and HAIC + sorafenib had the higher likelihood of providing better partial response and objective response rate outcomes compared to HAIC. HAIC + PD-1, HAIC + TACE + S-1 and HAIC + TACE had the higher likelihood of providing better complete response and disease control rate outcomes compared to HAIC alone. CONCLUSION: HAIC proved more effective and safer than sorafenib and TACE. Furthermore, combined with other interventions, HAIC showed improved efficacy over HAIC monotherapy according to the treatment ranking analysis.

Clinical Effectiveness and Safety of Transarterial Chemoembolization: Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy Plus Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors With or Without Programmed Cell Death Protein-1 Inhibitors for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma-A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Locoregional treatment with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and systemic targeted immunotherapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) have achieved promising efficacy. The retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TACE and HAIC plus TKI with or without PD-1 for uHCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From November 2020 to February 2024, the data of 44 patients who received TACE-HAIC + TKI + PD-1 (THKP group) and 34 patients who received TACE-HAIC + TKI (THK group) were retrospectively analyzed. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progress-free survival (PFS), and secondary outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), conversion rates, and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: A total of 78 patients were recruited in our single-center study. The patients in THKP group had prolonged median OS [25 months, 95% confidence interval (CI) 24.0-26.0 vs 18 months, 95% CI 16.1-19.9; p = 0.000278], median PFS [16 months, 95% CI 14.1-17.9 vs 12 months 95% CI 9.6-14.4; p = 0.004] and higher ORR (38.6% vs 23.5%, p = 0. 156) and DCR (88.6% vs 64.7%, p = 0.011) compared with those in THK group. Multivariate analysis showed that treatment option and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level were independent prognostic factors of OS and PFS. The frequency of AEs were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The THKP group had better efficacy for uHCC than the THK group, with acceptable safety.

A Multidisciplinary Therapeutic Approach Proposal for Huge Hepatocellular Carcinomas Exceeding 10 cm in Diameter.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The outcome of hepatectomy for a hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) exceeding 10 cm (i.e., huge HCC) remains unfavorable. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the optimal therapeutic approach for huge HCCs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2008 and 2018, patients with a huge HCC who underwent treatment at our institution were enrolled. Cases not meeting the criteria (Child-Pugh grade A or performance status 0/1) and patients with distant metastases were excluded. Patients were stratified into three groups: a) upfront hepatectomy (Upfront); b) hepatectomy subsequent to hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC-Hr); and c) HAIC alone (HAIC). Survival rates, including overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), were analyzed. The cancer-specific mortality attributed to recurrence within one year after surgery was defined as "futile surgery"; the rate of futile surgery was also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 70 cases were censored (Upfront/HAIC-Hr/HAIC: 28/13/29). The 5-year PFS and OS rates for Upfront, HAIC-Hr, and HAIC were 7.7%, 69.2%, and 6.9%, and 37.1%, 79.1%, and 19.7%, respectively. The number of futile surgeries was 6 (21.4%) in the Upfront group, whereas no such cases occurred in the HAIC-Hr group. CONCLUSION: Although hepatectomy was advocated in the Upfront group due to the potential resectability, the outcomes were comparable to those of the HAIC group. Conversely, the HAIC-Hr group had promising outcomes, marked by a decreased prevalence of futile surgeries. Huge HCCs should be regarded as borderline resectable, even when deemed potentially resectable. Therefore, a multidisciplinary therapeutic approach might be reasonable.

The ARH score, a practical guide to decision-making for retreatment with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic arterial infusionchemotherapy (HAIC) is a promising option for large unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Identifying patients who could benefit from continuous HAIC remains a challenge. We aimed to establish an objective model to guide the decision for retreatment with HAIC. METHODS: Between 2015 and 2020, the data of patients with large unresectable HCC without macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic spread undergoing multiple HAIC cycles from 3 different centers were retrieved. We investigated the basic tumor parameters and the effect of HAIC on liver function and tumor response, and their impact on overall survival (OS). A point score (ARH, Assessment for Retreatment with HAIC) was built by using a stepwise Cox regression model in the training cohort (n = 112) and was validated in an independent validation cohort (n = 71). RESULTS: The high α-fetoprotein before the second cycle of HAIC, an increase in Child-Pugh score, and undesirable radiologic tumor responses remained independent negative prognostic factors and were used to create the ARH score. The prognosis of HCC patients deteriorated significantly with the increase in ARH score. The median OS of patients with ARH score 0-2 points and ≥ 2.5 points were 19.37 months and 11.60 months (P < 0.001). All of these results had been confirmed in the external validation cohort and demonstrated significance across multiple subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: The ARH score makes an excellent prediction of the prognosis of HCC patients who received retreatment of HAIC. Patients with an ARH score ≥ 2.5 prior to the second cycle of HAIC may not profit from further sessions.