Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 70
Filter
1.
Article in English | LILACS, BDENF - Nursing, COLNAL | ID: biblio-1553409

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Healthcare-associated infections pose a significant challenge, contributing to hospital morbidity and mortality. Objective: To describe the behavior of Healthcare Associated Infections before and during the pandemic reported to a high-complexity health institution in Colombia. Material and Methods: In our retrospective observational study on Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs), we analyzed data from all in-patients diagnosed with HAIs between 2018 and 2020. This included clinical, demographic, microbiological, and microbial susceptibility information collected from the Committee on Nosocomial Infections' prospective database. Data from 391 isolates were obtained using Whonet software for antimicrobial resistance surveillance. Results: We found 504 cases of HAIs (2018-2020) with an overall in-hospital infection rate of 2.55/1000 patient-days. The median age for pediatric patients was 5 years, and for adults, 56 years, with 57% male. The leading admission diagnoses were oncologic disease complications (31%). Bacteremia had a 30-day mortality rate of 13%, predominantly catheter-associated (37%). Gram-negative bacilli, notably Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, represented 58% cases of HAI. Discussion: The critical need for specific interventions and antimicrobial management to control HAIs, especially given the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, is highlighted. Conclusions: This is the first report on HAIs incidence at a tertiary hospital in Bucaramanga, Santander (Colombia). Bacteremia was predominant; 75% of HAIs patients had comorbidities. Gram-negative bacilli prevailed; a notable rise in ICU respiratory infections occurred during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic. Resistance to cephalosporins and carbapenems was prevalent.


Subject(s)
Drug Resistance, Microbial , Cross Infection , COVID-19
2.
Viana do Castelo; s.n; 20231204.
Thesis in Portuguese | BDENF - Nursing | ID: biblio-1527278

ABSTRACT

O presente relatório surge como a etapa final do Estágio de Natureza Profissional, inserido no Mestrado em Enfermagem Médico-Cirúrgica da Escola Superior de Saúde do Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, que decorreu de 3 de outubro de 2022 a 31 de março de 2023. A elaboração deste relatório visa uma análise crítico-reflexiva das experiências e atividades realizadas, bem como das competências desenvolvidas durante o estágio, que decorreu em dois contextos clínicos: Grupo de Coordenação Local do Programa de Prevenção e Controlo de Infeções e de Resistência aos Antimicrobianos e Unidade de Endoscopia Digestiva, de um hospital central. A realização deste estágio proporcionou a aquisição e o desenvolvimento de competências comuns e específicas do Enfermeiro Especialista em Enfermagem Médico-Cirúrgica. Este relatório tem também como objetivo descrever o desenvolvimento do estudo de investigação intitulado Reprocessamento em Endoscopia Digestiva - contributo para a prevenção da Infeção Associada aos Cuidados de Saúde. Sendo os endoscópios dispositivos reutilizáveis com uma estrutura muito complexa, o reprocessamento destes equipamentos inclui várias etapas, que devem ser rigorosamente cumpridas, de forma a se prevenir a infeção associada à endoscopia e com isso garantir a segurança dos utentes e profissionais envolvidos. Trata-se de um estudo de natureza quantitativa, do tipo exploratório e descritivo, sustentado pela descrição de práticas de 22 profissionais de saúde (13 enfermeiros e 9 assistentes operacionais), no reprocessamento de endoscópios altos e endoscópios baixos, com deteção das principais falhas, principais dificuldades sentidas e estratégias de melhoria apresentadas pelos mesmos. Para a recolha de dados utilizámos a observação estruturada e o inquérito por questionário. Os resultados obtidos evidenciaram que apesar de serem executadas a maioria das etapas de reprocessamento, existem vários desvios das boas práticas, comprometendo a adequada desinfeção dos dispositivos e consequentemente aumentando o risco de transmissão de infeção através dos equipamentos. O espaço físico desadequado ao reprocessamento e os rácios de assistentes operacionais baixos na sala de descontaminação foram os principais aspetos mencionados pelos profissionais como dificultadores do cumprimento das etapas de reprocessamento. A resolução destas situações, foi as principais sugestões de melhoria descritas pelos profissionais como forma de prevenir as infeções associadas ao reprocessamento de endoscópios. Podemos concluir que este estudo contribuiu para a melhoria das práticas associadas ao reprocessamento de endoscópios no respetivo contexto, tendo evidenciado a necessidade de formação teórica e prática, de forma a possibilitar aos profissionais envolvidos a aquisição de conhecimentos e a adoção de práticas seguras, maximizando a prevenção, intervenção e controlo da infeção.


This report emerges as the final stage of the Professional Internship, integrated into the Master's in Medical-Surgical Nursing at the School of Health of the Polytechnic Institute of Viana do Castelo, which took place from 3rd of October, 2022, to 31st of March 2023. The preparation of this report aims for a critical-reflexive analysis of the experiences and activities carried out, as well as the skills developed during the Professional Internship, which took place in two clinical contexts: the Local Coordination Group of the Infection Prevention and Control and Antimicrobial Resistance Program and the Digestive Endoscopy Unit of a central hospital. The completion of this internship provided the acquisition and development of common and specific competencies of a Nurse Specialist in Medical-Surgical Nursing. This report also aims to describe the development of the research study entitled Reprocessing in Digestive Endoscopy - contribution to the prevention of healthcare-associated infection. Since endoscopes are reusable devices with a highly complex structure, the reprocessing of these equipment involves several stages that must be rigorously followed to prevent infection associated with endoscopy and ensure the safety of patients and professionals involved. This is a quantitative, exploratory, and descriptive study, supported by the description of the practices of 22 healthcare professionals (13 nurses and 9 operational assistants) in the reprocessing of high and low endoscopes, with the detection of key failures, main difficulties experienced, and improvement strategies presented by them. To collect data, structured observation and questionnaire surveys were used. The results obtained showed that despite most of the reprocessing steps being carried out, there are several deviations from best practices, compromising the proper disinfection of devices and consequently increasing the risk of infection transmission through the equipment. Inadequate physical space for reprocessing and low operational assistant ratios in the decontamination room were the main aspects mentioned by professionals as hindrances to complying with the reprocessing steps. The resolution of these situations was the primary improvement suggestions described by professionals as a way to prevent infections associated with endoscope reprocessing. In conclusion this study contributed to the improvement of practices associated with the reprocessing of endoscopes in the respective context, having highlighted the need for theoretical and practical training, in order to enable the professionals involved to acquire knowledge and adopt safe practices, maximizing prevention, intervention and control of infection.


Subject(s)
Mental Competency
3.
Cureus ; 15(9): e45951, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37885560

ABSTRACT

Early-onset sepsis (EOS) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in newborns, usually caused by pathogens acquired intrapartum. We present the case of a term neonate born by home delivery in the toilet, after an unsupervised pregnancy. He developed a culture-proven early-onset sepsis caused by Acinetobacter baumannii. This was the first case of neonatal sepsis by this pathogen in our unit. The microorganism was susceptible to all antibiotics tested. The neonate was treated empirically with ampicillin and cefotaxime and completed 21 days of directed therapy with meropenem, as meningitis could not be excluded. During the clinical course, the newborn developed severe and persistent thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. In this report, we discuss the etiology behind this clinical presentation. We intend to raise awareness for the consideration of Acinetobacter baumannii as a potential pathogen in EOS, particularly in the presence of adverse birth circumstances.

4.
Rev. epidemiol. controle infecç ; 13(3): 143-149, jul.-set. 2023. ilus
Article in English, Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1531883

ABSTRACT

Justification and Objectives: despite the importance of companions/visitors for hospitalized patients under specific precautions, it is noted that risks of exposure and dissemination of microorganisms in health services by this population are still incipient in the literature. Thus, the objective was to characterize the current recommendations on specific precautions for companions and visitors of hospitalized patients and to analyze the barriers to their implementation from infection preventionists' perspective. Methods: a descriptive and exploratory study with a quantitative approach, with 89 infection preventionists, between March and June 2020. Data collected by electronic questionnaire, "snowball" sampling and analyzed according to frequency of responses. Results: hand hygiene was the most recommended recommendation (>95.0%). As for non-conformities, staying in the room without attire (78.6%), going to other rooms (53.9%) and keeping doors open as aerosol precaution (51.7%) stood out. Regarding the strategies adopted to guide companions/visitors, there was a predominance of individual verbal guidance (92.4%). The main barrier cited was the lack of institutional policy (56.2%). Conclusion: there was no uniformity in the recommendations, and non-conformities and barriers were listed. The importance of specific prevention guidelines for this public and effective educational strategies for its implementation are highlighted.(AU)


Justificativa e Objetivos: apesar da importância dos acompanhantes/visitantes para pacientes hospitalizados em precauções específicas, nota-se que os riscos de exposição e disseminação de microrganismos nos serviços de saúde por essa população ainda são incipientes na literatura. Dessa forma, objetivou-se caracterizar as recomendações vigentes sobre precauções específicas para acompanhantes e visitantes de pacientes hospitalizados e analisar as barreiras para a sua implementação sob a ótica de prevencionistas de infecção. Métodos: estudo descritivo e exploratório, de abordagem quantitativa, com 89 prevencionistas de infecção, entre março e junho de 2020. Dados coletados por questionário eletrônico, com amostragem tipo "bola de neve" e analisados segundo frequência das respostas. Resultados: a higienização das mãos foi a recomendação mais indicada (>95,0%). Quanto às não conformidades, destacou-se permanecer no quarto sem paramentação (78,6%), frequentar outros quartos (53,9%) e manter portas abertas em precaução para aerossóis (51,7%). Referente às estratégias adotadas para a orientar os acompanhantes/visitantes, houve predomínio da orientação verbal individual (92,4%). A principal barreira citada foi a falta de política institucional (56,2%). Conclusão: não houve uniformidade nas recomendações, e não conformidades e barreiras foram elencadas. Destaca-se a importância de diretrizes de prevenção específicas para esse público e estratégias educativas efetivas para sua implementação.(AU)


Justificación y Objetivos: a pesar de la importancia de los acompañantes/visitantes para pacientes hospitalizados bajo precauciones específicas, se advierte que los riesgos de exposición y diseminación de microorganismos en los servicios de salud por parte de esta población son aún incipientes en la literatura. Así, el objetivo fue caracterizar las recomendaciones vigentes sobre precauciones específicas para acompañantes y visitantes de pacientes hospitalizados y analizar las barreras para su implementación desde la perspectiva de los preventivos de infecciones. Métodos: estudio descriptivo y exploratorio con enfoque cuantitativo, con 89 prevencionistas de infecciones, entre marzo y junio de 2020. Datos recolectados por cuestionario electrónico, muestreo "bola de nieve" y analizados según frecuencia de respuestas. Resultados: la higiene de manos fue la recomendación más recomendada (>95,0%). En cuanto a las no conformidades, se destacó permanecer en la habitación sin atuendo (78,6%), ir a otras habitaciones (53,9%) y mantener las puertas abiertas como precaución contra los aerosoles (51,7%). En cuanto a las estrategias adoptadas para orientar a los acompañantes/visitantes, hubo predominio de la orientación verbal individual (92,4%). La principal barrera citada fue la falta de política institucional (56,2%). Conclusión: no hubo uniformidad en las recomendaciones, y se enumeraron las no conformidades y las barreras. Se destaca la importancia de pautas de prevención específicas para este público y estrategias educativas efectivas para su implementación.(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Visitors to Patients/education , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Infection Control , Patients , Epidemiology, Descriptive , Patient Safety
5.
Rev. epidemiol. controle infecç ; 13(3): 158-163, jul.-set. 2023. ilus
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1532001

ABSTRACT

Background and Objectives: Recently, complementary resources and equipment have emerged to improve prevention of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). Our aim is to verify availability and use of different resources/ equipment by infection controllers. Methods: We conducted a survey with infection controllers from the State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, by invitation using a social media group, in August 2022. Nine different resources and equipment were evaluated. Categorical and continuous variables were evaluated by the chi-square test and Mann­Whitney U test, respectively. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: One hundred and eight persons answered the questionnaire. The mean age was 42.8 years (SD +/- 8.5 years) and 53 (49.1%) reported most of their workload in public hospitals, 45 (41.7%) in private hospitals and 10 (9.2%) reported the same workload in public and private hospitals. Sixty-there percent reported teaching activities in their institutions. There was no correlation between the existence of teaching activities and hospital profile (p=0.42). The most common resource available was molecular biology (PCR) for microbiological samples research for 73 (67.6%) participants. The second resource most available was applications (Apps) for HAIs prevention and control for 33 (30.6%), 19 (17.6%) reported no availability of resource/equipment technology. Conclusion: Molecular biology (PCR) for microbiological samples research was the most common resource available for infection controllers of an important state of Brazil.(AU)


Justificativas e Objetivos: Recentemente, recursos e equipamentos complementares têm surgido para melhorar a prevenção de infecções relacionadas à assistência à saúde. O objetivo deste artigo é verificar a disponibilidade e o uso de diferentes recursos e equipamentos pelos controladores de infecção. Métodos: Realizamos uma pesquisa do tipo survey com controladores de infecção do estado do Rio de Janeiro, por meio de convite pela mídia social, em agosto de 2022. Nove diferentes recursos e equipamentos foram avaliados quanto à disponibilidade e ao uso. Variáveis categóricas e contínuas foram avaliadas pelo teste qui-quadrado e Mann-Whitney, respectivamente. Um valor de p menor que 0,05 foi considerado estatisticamente significativo. Resultados: Cento e oito pessoas responderam ao questionário. A média de idade foi de 42,8 anos (DP +/- 8,5 anos), e 53(49,1%) relataram maior carga de trabalho em hospitais públicos, 45 (41,7%) em hospitais privados e 10(9,2%) carga horária similar nos dois tipos de hospitais. Dos 108, 63% relataram a existência de atividades de ensino nas instituições. Não houve correlação entre existência de atividades de ensino e tipo de hospital (p=0,42). O recurso mais disponível foi o uso de biologia molecular (reação em cadeia de polimerase) por 73 (67,6%) participantes. A segunda ferramenta mais encontrada foi o uso de aplicativos para prevenção e controle de infecção para 33 (30,6%) desses participantes. Dezenove deles (17,6%) relataram ausência de todos os recursos/equipamentos. Conclusão: O uso de biologia molecular para pesquisa de amostras biológicas foi o recurso mais disponível para controladores de infecção de um importante estado brasileiro.(AU)


Antecedentes y objetivos: Recientemente han surgido recursos y equipos complementarios para mejorar la prevención de las infecciones asociadas a la atención de la salud. El objetivo es verificar la disponibilidad y el uso de diferentes recursos/equipos por los controladores de infecciones. Métodos: Realizamos una encuesta entre los controladores de infecciones del estado de Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, por invitación en redes sociales, en agosto de 2022. Se evaluó la disponibilidad y uso de nueve recursos y equipos diferentes. Las variables categóricas y continuas se evaluaron mediante las pruebas de chi-cuadrado y Mann-Whitney, respectivamente. Se consideró estadísticamente significativo un valor de p < 0.05. Resultados: Ciento ocho personas respondieron al cuestionario. La edad media fue de 42,8 años (DE +/- 8,5 años) y 53 (49,1%) reportaron mayor carga de trabajo en hospitales públicos, 45 (41,7%) en privados y 10 (9,2%) reportaron la misma carga en hospitales públicos y privados. De los 108, el 63% reportó actividades docentes en sus instituciones. No hubo correlación entre la existencia de actividades docentes y el tipo de hospital (p=0,42). El recurso más disponible fue el uso de la biología molecular (reacción en cadena de la polimerasa) por 73 (67,6%) participantes. El segundo más común fue el uso de aplicaciones de prevención y control de infecciones por 33 (30,6%) participantes. Diecinueve participantes (17,6%) señalaron la ausencia de todos los recursos/equipos. Conclusiones: El uso de la biología molecular para investigar muestras microbiológicas fue el recurso/equipo más disponible para los controladores de infecciones de un importante estado brasileño.(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Cross Infection , Infection Control , Biomedical Technology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Molecular Biology
6.
Microb Drug Resist ; 29(10): 456-476, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37643289

ABSTRACT

Hospital-acquired infections are a rising problem with consequences for patients, hospitals, and health care workers. Biocides can be employed to prevent these infections, contributing to eliminate or reduce microorganisms' concentrations at the hospital environment. These antimicrobials belong to several groups, each with distinct characteristics that need to be taken into account in their selection for specific applications. Moreover, their activity is influenced by many factors, such as compound concentration and the presence of organic matter. This article aims to review some of the chemical biocides available for hospital infection control, as well as the main factors that influence their efficacy and promote susceptibility decreases, with the purpose to contribute for reducing misusage and consequently for preventing the development of resistance to these antimicrobials.


Subject(s)
Disinfectants , Humans , Disinfectants/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Hospitals , Drug Resistance, Bacterial
7.
J Educ Health Promot ; 12: 168, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37404933

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) are a primary cause of illness and death and increased expenditure due to prolonged hospitalization and poor prognosis. HAI is a global safety concern, according to World Health Organization (WHO). This study assesses the current level of knowledge and perception regarding hospital infection control practices among nursing students and evaluates the impact of structured training interventions on their baseline knowledge and perception level. METHODS AND MATERIALS: It was a single group, a pre-post interventional study done on nursing students of one government and one private nursing college in the year 2021. A pretested questionnaire consisting of was used as a study tool. Various statistical tests like one repeated-measure ANOVA, Mauchly's Test of Sphericity, and Greenhouse-Geisser correction were used. RESULTS: The mean knowledge was minimum in the pretest group (Mean = 79.4430, SD = 17.49746) and maximum immediately after the training group (Mean = 96.5443, SD = 25.42322). But after one month, knowledge decreased; however, it was more than pre-training Knowledge (Mean = 84.4937, SD = 22.40313). CONCLUSIONS: Annual educational/training modules help retain knowledge in hospital infection control practices and HAI prevention. All healthcare workers need regular training.

8.
Rev Panam Salud Publica ; 47: e70, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37089786

ABSTRACT

Objective: This study aimed to determine the performance of infection prevention and control (IPC) programs in eight core components in level 2 and level 3 hospitals across all provinces in Colombia. Methods: This cross-sectional study used self-assessed IPC performance data voluntarily reported by hospitals to the Ministry of Health and Social Protection during 2021. Each of the eight core components of the World Health Organization's checklist in the Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Framework contributes a maximum score of 100, and the overall IPC performance score is the sum of these component scores. IPC performance is graded according to the overall score as inadequate (0-200), basic (201-400), intermediate (401-600) or advanced (601-800). Results: Of the 441 level 2 and level 3 hospitals, 267 (61%) reported their IPC performance. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) overall IPC score was 672 (IQR: 578-715). Of the 267 hospitals reporting, 187 (70%) achieved an advanced level of IPC. The median overall IPC score was significantly higher in private hospitals (690, IQR: 598-725) than in public hospitals (629, IQR: 538-683) (P < 0.001). Among the core components, scores were highest for the category assessing IPC guidelines (median score: 97.5) and lowest for the category assessing workload, staffing and bed occupancy (median score: 70). Median overall IPC scores varied across the provinces (P < 0.001). Conclusions: This countrywide assessment showed that 70% of surveyed hospitals achieved a self-reported advanced level of IPC performance, which reflects progress in building health system resilience. Since only 61% of eligible hospitals participated, an important next step is to ensure the participation of all hospitals in future assessments.

9.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol ; 13: 1051020, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36816594

ABSTRACT

Infections caused by multi-drug resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae are a leading cause of mortality and morbidity among hospitalized patients. In neonatal intensive care units (NICU), blood stream infections by K. pneumoniae are one of the most common nosocomial infections leading to poor clinical outcomes and prolonged hospital stays. Here, we describe an outbreak of multi-drug resistant K. pneumoniae among neonates admitted at the NICU of a large tertiary care hospital in India. The outbreak involved 5 out of 7 neonates admitted in the NICU. The antibiotic sensitivity profiles revealed that all K. pneumoniae isolates were multi-drug resistant including carbapenems and colistin. The isolates belonged to three different sequence types namely, ST-11, ST-16 and ST-101. The isolates harboured carbapenemase genes, mainly bla NDM-1, bla NDM-5 and bla OXA-232 besides extended-spectrum ß-lactamases however the colistin resistance gene mcr-1, mcr-2 and mcr-3 could not be detected. Extensive environmental screening of the ward and healthcare personnel led to the isolation of K. pneumoniae ST101 from filtered incubator water, harboring bla NDM-5, bla OXA-232 and ESBL genes (bla CTX-M) but was negative for the mcr genes. Strict infection control measures were applied and the outbreak was contained. This study emphasizes that early detection of such high-risk clones of multi-drug resistant isolates, surveillance and proper infection control practices are crucial to prevent outbreaks and further spread into the community.


Subject(s)
Klebsiella Infections , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , beta-Lactamases/genetics , Colistin , Disease Outbreaks , Klebsiella Infections/epidemiology , Klebsiella pneumoniae/genetics , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Tertiary Care Centers , India/epidemiology
10.
Article in Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1513624

ABSTRACT

Introducción: Las infecciones asociadas con la asistencia sanitaria se acompañan de altas tasas de morbilidad y mortalidad, incremento en los días de hospitalización y costos directos e indirectos, que constituyen un evento negativo para el paciente y la institución. Objetivo: Evaluar el programa nacional de prevención y control de las infecciones asociadas con la asistencia sanitaria en el Servicio de Terapia Intensiva Polivalente del Hospital Pediátrico Provincial Eduardo Agramonte Piña, según indicadores de estructura, proceso y resultados. Métodos: Se realizó una investigación en sistemas y servicios de salud, de tipo transversal. El universo de estudio estuvo constituido por todos los hospitales de la provincia Camagüey con más de 100 camas y la muestra a discreción por el Servicio de Intensiva Polivalente Pediátrica. La fuente de obtención de datos primarios estuvo conformada por un cuestionario aplicado por las autoras. Resultados: De los diez indicadores de estructura nueve con buena evaluación, de los cinco indicadores de proceso todos recibieron una buena evaluación al igual que los siete indicadores de la dimensión de resultados. Un total de 22 parámetros, de ellos 21 con evaluación de bien y uno de mal. Conclusiones: La evaluación final del programa de prevención y control de las infecciones asociadas con la asistencia sanitaria fue de satisfactoria debido a que sus tres dimensiones obtuvieron resultado adecuado.


Introduction: Infections associated with health care are accompanied by high morbidity and mortality rates, which translates into an increase in hospital days and care costs, which constitute a negative event for the patient and the institution. Objective: To evaluate the national program for the prevention and control of infections associated with health care in the Multipurpose Intensive Care Service of the Eduardo Agramonte Piña Provincial Pediatric Hospital, according to indicators of structure, process and results. Methods: A cross-sectional investigation was carried out on health systems and services. The universe of study was made up of all the hospitals in the Camagüey province with more than 100 beds and the sample at the discretion of the Pediatric Polyvalent Intensive Care Service. The primary data source was made up of a questionnaire applied by the authors. Results: Of the ten structure indicators, nine with a good evaluation, of the five process indicators, all received a good evaluation, as well as the seven indicators of the results dimension. A total of 22 parameters, of which 21 evaluated as good and one evaluated as bad. Conclusions: The final evaluation of the program for the prevention and control of infections associated with health care was satisfactory because its three dimensions obtained adequate results.

11.
Esc. Anna Nery Rev. Enferm ; 27: e20220229, 2023. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, BDENF - Nursing | ID: biblio-1421429

ABSTRACT

RESUMO Objetivo Analisar a qualidade das práticas de profissionais dos programas de controle de infecção em relação aos componentes de estrutura, processo e resultado. Método Trata-se de um estudo de abordagem quantitativa, do tipo descritivo e transversal realizado em 114 serviços de controle de infecção hospitalar das cinco regiões oficiais do Brasil. Coletaram-se os dados por meio de um instrumento estruturado, cujas propriedades psicométricas foram validadas previamente. O tratamento dos dados foi realizado pela análise de componentes principais e o teste não paramétrico Kruskal-Wallis. Resultados O melhor índice de qualidade dos programas de controle de infecção foi atribuído à região Sul, aos hospitais que continham 300 leitos ou mais, aos que utilizavam o critério National Healthcare Safety Network para vigilância das infecções e aos locais que realizavam busca ativa prospectiva como método de vigilância. Conclusão e implicações para a prática O índice de qualidade dos programas de controle de infecção está relacionado à localização, ao tamanho do hospital e ao método adotado para vigilância de infecções. A criação de um índice de qualidade, até então inédito em estudos nacionais, chama atenção para o desempenho precário dos serviços de saúde.


RESUMEN Objetivo Analizar la calidad de las prácticas de los profesionales de los programas de control de infecciones en relación con los componentes de estructura, proceso y resultado. Método Se trata de un estudio cuantitativo, descriptivo y transversal realizado en 114 servicios de control de infecciones hospitalarias de las cinco regiones oficiales de Brasil. Los datos fueron recolectados mediante un instrumento estructurado, cuyas propiedades psicométricas fueron previamente validadas. El tratamiento de los datos se realizó mediante el análisis de componentes principales y la prueba no paramétrica de Kruskal-Wallis. Resultados El mejor índice de calidad de los programas de control de infecciones se atribuyó a la región Sur, a los hospitales que tenían 300 camas o más, a los que utilizaron el criterio de National Healthcare Safety Network para la vigilancia de infecciones y a los locales que realizaban las búsquedas prospectivas activas como el método de vigilancia. Conclusión e implicaciones para la práctica La calidad de los programas de control de infecciones está relacionada con la ubicación, el tamaño del hospital y el método adoptado para la vigilancia de infecciones. La creación de un índice de calidad, hasta ahora inédito en los estudios brasileños, llama la atención sobre el precario desempeño de los servicios de salud.


ABSTRACT Objective To analyze the quality of professional practices in infection control programs regarding structure, process, and outcome. Method This is a quantitative, descriptive, and cross-sectional study carried out in 114 hospital infection control services in the five official regions of Brazil. The data were collected using a structured instrument whose psychometric properties were previously validated. Data treatment was performed by principal component analysis and non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test. Results The best quality index of infection control programs was attributed to the South region, to hospitals that had 300 beds or more, to those that used the National Healthcare Safety Network criterion for infection surveillance and to places that carried out an active prospective search as their surveillance method. Conclusion and implications for practice: The quality of infection control programs is related to hospital location, size, and infection surveillance method. The creation of a quality index, hitherto unheard of in Brazilian studies, draws attention to the precarious performance of health services.


Subject(s)
Humans , Quality of Health Care , Ancillary Services, Hospital , Infection Control , Hospital Infection Control Program , Patient Safety , Cross-Sectional Studies , Workload , Health Personnel
12.
Rev. panam. salud pública ; 47: e70, 2023. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1450292

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objective. This study aimed to determine the performance of infection prevention and control (IPC) programs in eight core components in level 2 and level 3 hospitals across all provinces in Colombia. Methods. This cross-sectional study used self-assessed IPC performance data voluntarily reported by hospitals to the Ministry of Health and Social Protection during 2021. Each of the eight core components of the World Health Organization's checklist in the Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Framework contributes a maximum score of 100, and the overall IPC performance score is the sum of these component scores. IPC performance is graded according to the overall score as inadequate (0-200), basic (201-400), intermediate (401-600) or advanced (601-800). Results. Of the 441 level 2 and level 3 hospitals, 267 (61%) reported their IPC performance. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) overall IPC score was 672 (IQR: 578-715). Of the 267 hospitals reporting, 187 (70%) achieved an advanced level of IPC. The median overall IPC score was significantly higher in private hospitals (690, IQR: 598-725) than in public hospitals (629, IQR: 538-683) (P < 0.001). Among the core components, scores were highest for the category assessing IPC guidelines (median score: 97.5) and lowest for the category assessing workload, staffing and bed occupancy (median score: 70). Median overall IPC scores varied across the provinces (P < 0.001). Conclusions. This countrywide assessment showed that 70% of surveyed hospitals achieved a self-reported advanced level of IPC performance, which reflects progress in building health system resilience. Since only 61% of eligible hospitals participated, an important next step is to ensure the participation of all hospitals in future assessments.


RESUMEN Objetivo. El objetivo de este estudio es determinar el desempeño de los programas de prevención y control de infecciones (PCI) en relación con ocho componentes básicos en hospitales de nivel 2 y 3 de todas las provincias de Colombia. Métodos. En este estudio transversal se emplearon datos de autoevaluación del desempeño de los programas de PCI informados voluntariamente al Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social por parte de los hospitales durante el 2021. Cada uno de los ocho componentes básicos de la lista de verificación de la Organización Mundial de la Salud incluidos en el Marco de evaluación de prevención y control de infecciones al nivel de establecimientos de atención de salud recibe una puntuación máxima de 100, y la puntuación general del desempeño del programa es la suma de las puntuaciones de estos componentes. Este desempeño se califica según la puntuación general como inadecuado (0-200), básico (201-400), intermedio (401-600) o avanzado (601-800). Resultados. De los 441 hospitales de nivel 2 y nivel 3, 267 (61%) informaron datos sobre su desempeño. La mediana (rango intercuartil [IQR]) de la puntuación general fue de 672 (IQR: 578-715). De los 267 hospitales que proporcionaron información, 187 (70%) alcanzaron el nivel avanzado. La mediana de la puntuación general fue significativamente mayor en los hospitales privados (690, IQR: 598-725) que en los hospitales públicos (629, IQR: 538-683) (p < 0,001). En el caso de los componentes básicos, las puntuaciones más altas fueron para la categoría que evalúa las directrices de PCI (puntuación mediana: 97,5) y más bajas para la categoría que evalúa la carga de trabajo, la dotación de personal y la ocupación de camas (puntuación mediana: 70). La mediana de las puntuaciones generales de PCI varió entre las provincias (p < 0,001). Conclusiones. Esta evaluación a nivel nacional mostró que el 70% de los hospitales encuestados lograron un nivel avanzado autoinformado del desempeño en cuanto a la PCI, lo que refleja el progreso en fortalecimiento de la resiliencia del sistema de salud. Dado que solo participó el 61% de los hospitales que reunían las condiciones, el siguiente paso importante es garantizar la participación de todos los hospitales en futuras evaluaciones.


RESUMO Objetivo. Este estudo teve o objetivo de determinar o desempenho de programas de prevenção e controle de infecções (PCI) quanto a oito componentes centrais em hospitais secundários e terciários de todas as províncias da Colômbia. Métodos. Este estudo transversal utilizou dados de desempenho autoavaliado de PCI enviados voluntariamente pelos hospitais ao Ministério da Saúde e Proteção Social em 2021. Cada um dos oito componentes centrais da lista de verificação na Estrutura de Avaliação de Prevenção e Controle de Infecções da Organização Mundial da Saúde contribui com uma pontuação máxima de 100. A pontuação total de desempenho de PCI é a soma das pontuações nesses componentes. De acordo com a pontuação total, o desempenho de PCI é classificado nas seguintes categorias: inadequado (0-200), básico (201-400), intermediário (401-600) ou avançado (601-800). Resultados. Dos 441 hospitais secundários e terciários, 267 (61%) informaram o desempenho de PCI. A mediana (intervalo interquartil [IIQ]) da pontuação total de PCI foi 672 (IIQ: 578-715). Dos 267 hospitais que disponibilizaram informações, 187 (70%) alcançaram um nível de PCI avançado. A mediana da pontuação total de PCI foi significativamente maior nos hospitais privados (690, IIQ: 598-725) do que nos públicos (629, IIQ: 538-683) (p < 0,001). Entre os componentes centrais, as pontuações mais altas foram observadas na categoria de avaliação das diretrizes de PCI (pontuação mediana: 97,5), ao passo que as mais baixas ocorreram na categoria de avaliação da carga de trabalho, dotação de pessoal e taxa de ocupação de leitos (pontuação mediana: 70). As medianas das pontuações totais de PCI variaram entre províncias (p < 0,001). Conclusões. Esta avaliação nacional mostrou que 70% dos hospitais pesquisados alcançaram um nível avançado de desempenho autorrelatado de PCI, o que demonstra progresso no desenvolvimento de resiliência no sistema de saúde. Como apenas 61% dos hospitais elegíveis participaram, um próximo passo importante é assegurar a participação de todos os hospitais em futuras avaliações.

13.
Rev. eletrônica enferm ; 25: 74024, 2023.
Article in English, Portuguese | LILACS, BDENF - Nursing | ID: biblio-1435265

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: avaliar criticamente Programas de Controle de Infecções Relacionadas à Assistência à Saúde (PCIRAS) em hospitais de médio-extra portes, quanto ao cumprimento dos critérios sanitários nacionais. Métodos: estudo transversal realizado em 18 hospitais com Comissões de Controle de Infecções Relacionadas à Assistência à Saúde (CCIRAS) dos estados de Goiás e São Paulo, Brasil. Para coleta de dados aplicou-se formulário online fundamentado nos itens de avaliação preconizados pela Resolução de Diretoria Colegiada (RDC) Nº 48/2000 - ANVISA. Para análise estatística utilizou-se exame da frequência e distribuição das variáveis (média e desvio padrão - DP). Resultados: as CCIRAS atenderam 100% dos itens imprescindíveis, 93,0% (DP = 5,8) dos necessários e 64,8% (DP = 32,5) dos recomendados. Os Serviços de Controle de IRAS atenderam 90,2% (DP = 16,1) dos itens necessários, e 77,8% (DP = 19,2) dos recomendáveis. Conclusão: itens imprescindíveis foram cumpridos, porém os necessários e recomendados apresentam diferentes graus de inconformidades, podendo comprometer a prevenção e controle de IRAS. A aplicação de roteiro baseado na RDC N° 48/2000 contribui para conhecer a realidade dos PCIRAS dos hospitais, contudo, essa normativa não estabelece percentual mínimo de conformidade, dificultando a interpretação dos resultados. Há necessidade de atualizá-la para instrumentalizar os órgãos fiscalizadores.


Objective: to critically evaluate Healthcare-Associated Infection Control Programs (HAICP) in medium to extra-large hospitals, as to compliance with national health criteria. Methods: cross-sectional study conducted in 18 hospitals with Healthcare-Associated Infection Control Committees (HAICC) in the states of Goiás and São Paulo, Brazil. Data were collected using online form based on the evaluation items from Directors' Collegiate Resolution (RDC) Nº 48/2000 ­ ANVISA. For statistical analysis, frequency, and distribution of variables (mean; standard deviation - SD) were examined. Results:HAICC met 100% of the indispensable items, 93.0% (SD = 5.8) of the required, and 64.8% (SD = 32.5) of the recommended. Healthcare-Associated Infection Control Services complied with 90.2% (SD = 16.1) of the necessary items, and 77.8% (SD = 19.2) of those recommended. Conclusion: indispensable items were met, but the necessary and recommended ones present different degrees of noncompliance, which may compromise the prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections. The application of a script based on the RDC Nº 48/2000 contributes to identify the reality of the hospitals' HAICP, however, this normative does not establish a minimum percentage of compliance, making it difficult to interpret the results. It is necessary to update it in order to provide tools to surveillance agencies.


Objetivo: evaluar críticamente los Programas de Control de Infecciones Relacionadas con la Atención de Salud (PCIRAA) en hospitales medianos y grandes para determinar si cumplen con los criterios nacionales de salud. Métodos: estudio transversal realizado en 18 hospitales con Comisiones de Control de las Infecciones Asociadas a la Atención de Salud (CCIAAS) en los estados de Goiás y São Paulo, Brasil. Para la recolección de datos se aplicó un formulario online, desarrollado con base en los ítems de evaluación recomendados por la Resolución Directiva Colegiada (RDC) Nº 48/2000 de la ANVISA. Para el análisis estadístico, se utilizó el examen de la frecuencia y distribución de las variables (media y desvío estándar - DE). Resultados:las CCIAAS cumplieron en promedio el 100% de los ítems indispensables, el 93,0% (DE = 5,8) de los necesarios y el 64,8% (DE = 32,5) de los recomendados. Los Servicios de Control de las Infecciones Asociadas a la Atención de Salud cumplieron en promedio el 90,2% (DE = 16,1) de los ítems necesarios y el 77,8% (DE = 19,2) de los recomendados. Conclusión: se cumplieron los ítems imprescindibles, pero los necesarios y los recomendados presentan diferentes grados de disconformidad, que pueden comprometer la prevención y el control de las infecciones asociadas a la atención de salud. La aplicación de la rutina basada en la RDC Nº 48/2000 contribuyó a conocer la realidad de los PCIRAA en los hospitales, pero esta normativa no establece un porcentaje mínimo de conformidad, lo que dificulta la interpretación de los resultados. Se hace necesario actualizarla para dotar de herramientas a los organismos supervisores


Subject(s)
Humans , Cross Infection , Epidemiological Monitoring , Quality of Health Care , Hospital Infection Control Program
14.
Virusdisease ; 33(3): 236-243, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35965883

ABSTRACT

Environmental surfaces are potential source of SARS-CoV2 transmission. The study assessed the efficacy of hospital disinfection policy and contamination of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) RNA in COVID management Hospital. Inanimate surfaces from both patient areas (n = 70) and non-patient areas (n = 39) were sampled through surface swabbing and subjected to Reverse transcriptase PCR. Out of the 70 samples collected from the COVID hospital, SARS-CoV2 RNA positivity of 17.5% (7/40) and 6.7% (2/30) was seen in high risk and moderate risk area respectively. Samples from Non COVID related patient area such as CD ward and administrative block were assessed and the SARS CoV-2 RNA positivity was 0% and 10% respectively. Among the total 8 environmental surface samples positive for SARS-CoV2 RNA detected from the area surrounding the SARS-CoV2 infected patients, maximum positivity of 31.8% (7/22) was found among the environmental samples collected around the patients with < 20 Ct value in nasopharyngeal swab samples followed by 3.3% positivity (1/30) around patients with Ct value ranging from 20 to 25 whereas no SARS-CoV2 RNA (0/5) was detected around the patient with > 25 Ct value. Nearly 50% (2/4) of the surface samples came positive from the resident PPE and mobile of the treating doctors which largely elaborates the need for stringent doffing measurement and hand hygiene policy post doffing. The study emphasizes the necessity of frequent and aggressive disinfection policy to prevent nosocomial infection in such high risk areas within close vicinity of the patients.

15.
Cureus ; 14(7): e26664, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35949742

ABSTRACT

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a serious problem that poses an imminent threat to patient safety. But drug-resistant bacteria can be prevented from spreading in hospital facilities by implementing effective antimicrobial stewardship practices. Antimicrobial stewardship programs are a set of measures taken by an organization to optimize antimicrobial use, improve patient outcomes, reduce AMR and healthcare-associated infections, and save healthcare costs. Healthcare facilities should have a defined antimicrobial stewardship policy in place that is available to all stakeholders. The policy should be evidence-based, regularly updated, and communicated clearly both verbally and through visual means such as posters. All staff should be trained on the proper use of antimicrobials as well as how to report misuse. Antibiotic stewardship measures include: educating and screening patients, monitoring, updating policies, limiting the use of high-risk medications, developing and improving hand hygiene practices, tracing the path of each medication, using computerized alert probes, using computerized medication records, educating staff, and creating the culture of prevention. There are several ways that antimicrobial stewardship practices can be implemented in the healthcare setting, including limiting the use of antibiotics and promoting healthy behaviors. With these strategies in place, infections can be prevented from occurring in the first place.

16.
Infect Disord Drug Targets ; 22(5): e180422203723, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35440319

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The higher mortality rate in COVID-19 patients is still a concern. Though some studies mention that elderly patients with co-morbidities are at higher risk of mortality, some others report uneventful outcomes in young patients even without co-morbidities. Secondary bacterial and fungal infections, especially with nosocomial pathogens are known to be associated with worse outcome in the ongoing pandemic as well as in the previous viral outbreaks. In such a scenario, the outcome of hospitalized COVID-19 patients can be improved by timely identification of secondary infections using appropriate biomarkers and by following appropriate infection control measures to prevent the spread of nosocomial pathogens. OBJECTIVE: The study aims to find out the prevalence of bloodstream infections (BSI) among hospitalized COVID-19 patients and to analyze their laboratory markers and outcome by comparing them with those without BSI. METHODS: In this descriptive cross-sectional study, the prevalence of secondary BSI was determined among the hospitalized COVID-19 patients by including 388 blood culture bottles collected from 293 patients, which were received in the microbiology lab within the study period. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of BSI in COVID-19 patients was 39.5% (116/293), out of which 35.5% (104/293) infections were bacterial, and 4.1% (12/293) were fungal, while 8.9% (26/293) patients grew contaminants, and 51.5% (151/293) were sterile. Common causative agents of secondary BSI were found to be MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae (10.9%) and Acinetobacter baumannii (8.8%) followed by Candida species (4.1%). Patients with co-morbidities like diabetes, hypertension and COPD were at higher risk of developing BSI with significantly higher levels of sepsis markers such as Creactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin, ferritin and Interleukin-6 (IL-6). The mortality rate was significantly higher (60.2%) in patients with BSI compared to the group of patients without BSI. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest the necessity of early diagnosis of the secondary infections using appropriate biomarkers and following proper infection control measures to prevent the spread of the nosocomial infections and improve the outcome of hospitalized COVID-19 patients.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia , COVID-19 , Coinfection , Cross Infection , Sepsis , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteremia/epidemiology , Bacteremia/microbiology , Bacteria , Biomarkers , COVID-19/epidemiology , Coinfection/drug therapy , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
17.
Cureus ; 14(2): e22487, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35371778

ABSTRACT

Background Nosocomial infections are a significant health concern. Following surgery, infections are most commonly associated with the surgical site, yet there are other potential sources for infections after surgical interventions. Identification of the source of infections can be very challenging. Methodology An outbreak of postoperative infections following surgery led to intensive care unit (ICU) admission of patients immediately after the surgical procedure. The blood cultures of two patients were positive for Citrobacter freundii. The only connection between all cases was the anesthesiologist. An epidemiological inquiry could not definitively identify the source of the outbreak. Therefore, we utilized an RNA sequencing technique to evaluate the microbiome of the anesthesiologist and compared the results to bacteria cultured from the bloodstream of the two patients. Results The anesthesiologist's microbiome contained amplicons that were identical to those of the bacteria in the patient's bloodstream. Because Citrobacter freundii is an uncommon source of bloodstream infections, and in the normal human microbiome, the results establish the source of a cluster of infections to the anesthesiologist. Conclusions In cases of nosocomial infections, when conventional microbiological techniques do not clearly establish the source of the infection, using 16S RNA sequencing should be considered.

19.
Clin Infect Dis ; 74(3): 529-531, 2022 02 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34113977

ABSTRACT

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends N95 respirators for all providers who see patients with possible or confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We suggest that N95 respirators may be just as important for the care of patients without suspected COVID-19 when community incidence rates are high. This is because severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 is most contagious before symptom onset. Ironically, by the time patients are sick enough to be admitted to the hospital with COVID-19, they tend to be less contagious. The greatest threat of transmission in healthcare facilities may therefore be patients and healthcare workers with early occult infection. N95 respirators' superior fit and filtration provide superior exposure protection for healthcare providers seeing patients with early undiagnosed infection and superior source control to protect patients from healthcare workers with early undiagnosed infection. The probability of occult infection in patients and healthcare workers is greatest when community incidence rates are high. Universal use of N95 respirators may help decrease nosocomial transmission at such times.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Delivery of Health Care , Humans , Masks , N95 Respirators , SARS-CoV-2
20.
Cureus ; 14(12): e32294, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36627984

ABSTRACT

Hospitalized persons with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) are placed in airborne isolation to prevent nosocomial infection, as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). There is significant evidence that clinicians overuse this resource due to an abundance of caution when confronted with a patient with possible PTB. Many researchers have developed predictive tools based on clinical and radiographic data to assist clinicians in deciding which patients to place in respiratory isolation. We assessed the isolation practices for an urban hospital serving a large immigrant population and then retrospectively applied seven previously derived prediction models of isolation of PTB to our population. Our current clinical practice results in 76% of patients with PTB being placed in isolation on admission. However, 208 patients without PTB were placed in isolation unnecessarily for a total of 584 days. Four models had sensitivities greater than 90%, and two models had sensitivities of 100%. The use of these models would have potentially saved more than 150 days of patient isolation per year.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...