Neurovascular crossing patterns between leash of Henry and deep branch of radial nerve: implications for neurointervention and diagnostic imaging.

OBJECTIVE: To detail the neurovascular crossing patterns between the leash of Henry (LoH) and the deep branch of the radial nerve (DBRN) in supination and pronation of the forearm, using imaging methods with anatomic correlation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was performed ex vivo with HRUS and MRI with anatomic correlation on 6 samples and in vivo with HRUS with Doppler on 55 participants scanned bilaterally. The in vivo participants were enrolled over a 6-month period. The crossing patterns between the LoH and DBRN were assessed ex vivo and in vivo. Additional morphological features of the DBRN, LoH, and fat plane were assessed in vivo only. Biometric features of the participants were recorded. Statistical analyses were performed using Shapiro-Wilk, parametric and non-parametric tests. RESULTS: The most common neurovascular crossing pattern was the ascending branch of the radial recurrent artery (RRAab) crossing below (ex vivo: 83.3%, in vivo: 85.3%) and the muscular branch crossing above (ex vivo: 100%, in vivo: 63.2% %) the DBRN. Both the deep and superficial surfaces of the DBRN exhibited an intimate relationship with the vessels of the LoH. A positive correlation between vessel diameter and anthropometric factors was observed. In addition, the muscular branch exhibited a significantly smaller diameter than the RRAab. CONCLUSION: Our study detailed the relationship between the LoH and the DBRN and highlighted the high incidence of vessel crossing above the DBRN at the level of the muscular branch. Knowledge of neurovascular crossings is crucial for understanding neurovascular entrapment syndromes and planning interventional procedures to reduce vascular complications.

Hydrodissection to create conjunctival flaps in dogs with corneal ulcers.

Background and Aim: Hydrodissection is a liquid injection technique that is rarely used in animal ophthalmic procedures. The use of this technique in the creation of conjunctival flaps for the treatment of corneal ulcers in dogs can improve the outcome, task, and comfort for patients. This study aimed to evaluate the use of hydrodissection in the creation of conjunctival flaps in dogs with corneal ulcers. Materials and Methods: This study focused on a surgical procedure for creating conjunctival flaps in the eyes of 17 dogs with deep corneal ulcers. We divided the patients into two groups: Hydrodissection was performed in the first group (G1) and conventional divulsion without hydrodissection in the second group (G2). In G1, the conjunctival flap was created by subconjunctival injection of 1 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride, followed by flap construction. The flap was constructed through conventional divulsion using iris scissors in the G2. The operative time, degree of bleeding, and ease of conjunctival divulsion were evaluated during the procedure. Blepharospasm, hyperemia, edema, and scarring of the conjunctiva were evaluated during the post-operative period. Post-operative complications, notably suture dehiscence, were recorded in each group. Results: Hydrodissection is an easy-to-perform maneuver that optimizes the construction of conjunctival flaps. There were no statistical differences in the parameters used to evaluate the trans- and post-operative period between the groups. The volume of sodium chloride administered in the conjunctiva ranged from 0.5 mL to 1 mL in G1. Dehiscence of the flap sutures was observed in four patients (two in G1 and two in G2), with no significant difference between the groups. Conclusion: Hydrodissection facilitates the construction of conjunctival flaps in dogs with corneal ulcers, affording greater comfort to patients and proving to be an excellent option for ophthalmologists.

Hydrodissection in the construction of conjunctival flaps in dogs

Background: Hydrodissection is a minimally invasive procedure that consists of injecting fluid into an anatomical space to facilitate dissection during surgery. Although this procedure is employed in several areas of veterinary medicine, including ophthalmology, there are no reports of the use of this maneuver in conjunctival procedures in dogs. The use of this technique can facilitate the construction of conjunctival pedicle flaps, thereby improving the results. The purpose of this work was to evaluate the use of hydrodissection in the construction of conjunctival pedicle flaps in dogs. Materials, Methods & Results: The sample consisted of 20 eyes from 10 healthy dogs that had been subjected to elective surgical procedures of ovariohysterectomy and orchiectomy. The dogs were divided into 2 groups; the 1st group of 10 eyes underwent hydrodissection and the 2nd group of 10 eyes did not. All the patients underwent a complete ophthalmic examination and assessment of their systemic conditions. The patients were then anesthetized and the procedures were performed under a surgical microscope. In the group subjected to hydrodissection, the conjunctival flap was prepared by means of a previous subconjunctival injection of 0.7 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride, followed by preparation of the flap. In the group without hydrodissection, the flap was prepared by means of conventional divulsion using iris scissors. After producing the conjunctival flaps, a conjunctival fragment was collected from both groups for histological analysis and evaluation of the presence of the Tenon capsule. The operating time, degree of hemorrhage and ease of handling the conjunctiva in the intraoperative period were evaluated. Postoperative evaluations were performed at 1, 7 and 14 days after surgery and included: blepharospasm, conjunctival hyperemia and edema, which were classified as absent, mild, moderate or severe; tear production was evaluated using the Schirmer test, and the appearance of the conjunctival scar was assessed based on photographs taken in the postoperative period, and by a visual analogue scale, with healing classified as fair, good or excellent. The 2 groups showed no statistical difference in terms of operating time, bleeding, ease of handling and conjunctival divulsion. A volume of 0.48 ± 0.12 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride was administered to the conjunctiva. Postoperative assessments of hyperemia, blepharospasm, conjunctival edema, and tear production also did not differ statistically. Conjunctival scarring was considered optimal until the 14th postoperative day, with no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups. These results demonstrate that both maneuvers are effective in creating conjunctival flaps. The Tenon capsule could not be identified in histological stains. Discussion: The literature offers numerous descriptions of the use of hydrodissection in surgical procedures in humans in order to facilitate dissection and reduce surgical duration and handling, thereby improving the clinical recovery of patients. Conversely, this technique has not been described frequently in veterinary medicine, notably with respect to conjunctival procedures. In this study, we demonstrated that conjunctival hydrodissection was perfectly feasible, contributing to the divulsion and preparation of conjunctival flaps, thus proving to be a viable option for this type of procedure. The absence of the Tenon capsule in the evaluated samples demonstrates that, in both groups, the techniques were effective in separating them from the conjunctiva. It was therefore concluded that the hydrodissection technique is a feasible maneuver in the construction of conjunctival flaps, providing a new option for surgeons, especially for novice ophthalmologists.

Sustained volume decreases in simple renal cysts after sclerotherapy using NBCA with or without hydrodissection.

The present study aimed to determine the effectiveness of sclerotherapy using NBCA (Histoacryl Blue®; B. Braun, Melgungen, Germany), with or without hydrodissection, for the treatment of simple renal cysts. Materials and Methods: Patients who presented to an interventional radiology clinic for the diagnosis of symptomatic renal cysts which had previously been identified at an outpatient clinic were selected for inclusion in this study. A total of 28 patients were randomly divided into 2 groups, based on whether or not they underwent hydrodissection along with ultrasound-guided NBCA-based sclerotherapy. Sonographs were performed at 0, 7, and 180 days post-procedure to record the residual volume of the renal cysts and to determine the efficacy of the procedure. Results: A total of 32 cysts in 28 patients were treated with sclerotherapy, 18 (64%) females and 10 (36%) males. The average age of the patients was 61.8 years (range: 33-89 years). All patients reported an improvement in symptoms associated with the existing renal cysts at 7 and 180 days post-procedure, and at 7 days post-procedure a statistically significant reduction in cyst volume was observed (all patients: 96.8%; group A: 96%; group B: 97.6%). The reduced cyst volume was still observed 180 days post-procedure (all patients: 98.6%; group A: 98.2%; group B: 98.9%). There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups. Conclusion: There is a significant and persistent reduction in the volume of renal cysts, in addition to an improvement of the associated symptoms, after treatment with NBCA-based sclerotherapy, with or without hydrodissection.

Pressurized hydrodissection for CT-guided percutaneous peritoneal navigation: The hydro jet technique.

The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the effectiveness of a new technique of hydrodissection for peritoneal structures displacement during preoperative localization markers placement. We retrospectively reviewed two cases of percutaneous fiducial marker placement prior rescue retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. In both cases pressurized 5% dextrose in water (D5W) was used to hydrodissect the peritoneal space and securely reach the lymph nodes. Two patients were submitted to water jet technique for transperitoneal trespassing to reach the retroperitoneum. The volume of fluid used to navigate was 125-200 mL and the mean time to cross the peritoneum was 6 min 47 s (ranging from 3″26' to 10″24'). In conclusion, Bowel and small vessels displacement using pressurized D5W is a safe method to reach retroperitoneal space during percutaneous procedures.

A 24 month follow-up of refractory macular holes treated with an autologous transplantation of internal limiting membrane versus retina expansion technique.

BACKGROUND: To compare the functional and anatomic outcomes at 24 months of eyes with a primary macular hole that failed to close after a prior surgery and were treated with either an autologous transplantation of internal limiting membrane (AT-ILM) or the retina expansion (RE) technique. METHODS: Retrospective, single center, comparative study of 28 eyes with a macular hole that failed to close after a prior vitrectomy. All eyes had a size of ≥ 500 µm. Participants were divided into two groups according to the type of intervention performed: AT-ILM group (n = 14) and RE group (n = 14). Main outcomes measured were the MH closure rate assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 24 months after surgery. RESULTS: Patients in the AT-ILM group experienced a statistically significantly improved post-operative BCVA (median 49.50 letters, range 20-66 letters) over the pre-operative BCVA (median 39 letters, range 18-52 letters) (p-value = 0.006 Wilcoxon paired sample test). In contrast, patients in the RE group did not achieve a statistically significant improvement (p-value = 0.328, Wilcoxon paired sample test). The median pre-operative BCVA was 35 letters (range 18-52 letters), whereas the median post-operative BCVA was 39 letters (range 16-66 letters). At 24 months of follow-up, 85.7% of patients in the AT-ILM group achieved closure compared to 57.1% in the RE group (p-value = 0.209, Fisher's exact test). Multivariate analysis showed that MH size and baseline BCVA were important determinants of post-operative BCVA. The baseline MH size was the only significant pre-operative factor that influenced MH closure. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates similar closure rates for both groups however better visual outcomes were obtained with the AT-ILM.

Hidrodisección guiada por ultrasonido para el tratamiento de pacientes con sindrome del tunel carpiano / Ultrasound-Guided hydrodissection for treatment of Patients with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

El estudio tuvo como objetivo comparar el grupo de hidrodisección de solución salina normal guiada por ultrasonido más esteroides y el grupo de hidrodisección de solución salina normal guiada por ultrasonido sola en pacientes con síndrome del túnel carpiano (STC), y determinar su relevancia clínica en relación con los resultados del tratamiento. Realizamos 60 hidrodisecciones guiadas por ecografía con solución salina normal con y sin inyecciones de corticosteroides en 51 pacientes con STC y evaluamos los resultados de la ecografía antes y después 21. Evers S, Thoreson AR, Smith J, Zhao C, Geske JR, Amadio PC. Ultrasound-guided hydrodissection decreases gliding resistance of the median nerve within the carpal tunnel. Muscle Nerve 2017 June 16. doi: 10.1002/mus.25723. 22. Smith J, Wisniewski S, J, Finnoff JT, Payne JM. Sonographically Guided Carpal Tunnel Injections. J Ultrasound Med 2008;27:1485-1490. 23. Trescott AME. Peripheral Nerve Entrapments: Clinical Diagnosis and Management. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2016 24. Marshall S, Tardif G, Ashworth N. Local corticosteroid injection for carpal tunnel syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002(4). 25. Atroshi I, Flondell M, Hofer M, Ranstam J. Methyprednisolone Injections for the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial. Ann Int Med 2013;159:309-317. 26. Peters-Veluthamaningal C, Winters JC, Groenier KH, Meyboom-de Jong B. Randomised controlled trial of local corticosteroid injections for carpal tunnel syndrome in general practice. BMC family practice 2010;11:54. 27. Wu YT, Ho TY, Chou YC, Ke MJ, Li TY, Tsai CK, et al. Six-month efficacy of perineural dextrose for carpal tunnel syndrome: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlledtrial. Mayo Clinic proceedings 2017;92:1179-1189. 28. Kirwan J. Is there a place for intra-articular hyaluronate in osteoarthritis of the knee? The Knee 2001;8:93-101. 29. Saltzman BM, Leroux T, Meyer MA, Basques BA, Chahal J, Bach BR, Jr., et al. The therapeutic effect of intra-articular normal saline injections for knee osteoarthritis: Ameta-analysis of evidence level 1 studies. The American journal of sports medicine 2017;45:2647-2653. 30. Padua L, Padua R, Aprile I, Pasqualetti P, Tonali P. Multiperspective follow-up of untreated carpal tunnel syndrome: a multicenter study. Neurology. 2001;56(11):1459­ 66 31. Ortiz-Corredor F, Enriquez F, Diaz-Ruiz J, Calambas N. Natural evolution of carpal tunnel syndrome in untreated patients. Clinical neurophysiology: official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology 2008;119:1373-1378 32. Gordon T, Brushart TM, Chan KM. Augmenting nerve regeneration with electrical stimulation. Neurol Res 2008; 30:1012- 1022. 33. Aulisa L, Tamburrelli F, Padua R, Romanini E, Lo Monaco M, Padua L. Carpal tunnel syndrome: Indication for surgical treatment based on electrophysiologic study. J Hand Surg Am 1998; 23:687-691. 34. Peters-Veluthamaningal C, Winters JC, Groenier KH, Meyboom- de Jong B. Randomised controlled trial of local corticosteroid injections for carpal tunnel syndrome in general practice. BMC Fam Pract. 2010;11:54. 35. Girlanda P, Dattola R, Venuto C, Mangiapane R, Nicolosi C, Messina C. Local steroid treatment in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome: short- and longterm efficacy. J Neurol. 1993; 240(3):187- 190. 36. Karadas¸ Ö, Tok F, Ulas¸ UH, Odabas¸i Z. The effectiveness of triamcinolone acetonide vs. procaine hydrochloride injection in the management of carpal tunnel syndrome: a double blind randomized clinical trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2011; 90(4):287-292. 128 LA PRENSA MÉDICA ARGENTINA Ultrasound-Guided hydrodissection for treatment of Patients with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome V.107/Nº 2 de la inyección. Clasificamos estas inyecciones en dos grupos según la solución salina normal más corticosteroide (grupo de esteroides). solución salina normal (grupo de control) y también registramos datos clínicos que incluyen el sexo, la edad, el lado de la inyección, el peso corporal y la duración de las molestias relacionadas con el STC antes de la inyección. Los resultados se midieron mediante la escala analógica visual que se asignó para evaluar el resultado primario. Los resultados secundarios se evaluaron mediante el cuestionario del síndrome del túnel carpiano de Boston, el área transversal del nervio mediano y estudios electrofisiológicos. La evaluación se realizó antes de la inyección y 1, 3 y 6 meses después de la inyección, y se comparó el alivio de los síntomas de los pacientes que recibieron la inyección de solución salina normal y de esteroides. Comparamos las hidrodisecciones con la solución salina normal y las inyecciones de corticosteroides; los datos clínicos, la preinyección de CSA-MN en la entrada del túnel carpiano y las puntuaciones de BCTQ antes de la inyección no mostraron diferencias significativas entre los grupos (p> 0,05). Todos los pacientes (datos de 30 muñecas en cada grupo) completaron el estudio. En comparación con el grupo de control, en todos los momentos posteriores a la inyección, ambos grupos tuvieron una reducción significativa del dolor y la discapacidad, una mejoría en las medidas de respuesta electrofisiológica y una disminución del área transversal del nervio mediano. Nuestro estudio revela que la solución salina normal guiada por ecografía con y sin hidrodisección de corticosteroides tiene un efecto terapéutico en los pacientes con STC. Se demostró que la hidrodisección nerviosa es potencialmente beneficiosa para los pacientes con STC antes de la cirugía. La hidrodisección es un procedimiento simple y mínimamente invasivo que se puede realizar utilizando únicamente NS. Además, en comparación con la inyección a ciegas, la hidrodisección bajo guía ecográfica puede reducir las posibilidades de lesión nerviosa.

The study aimed to compare Ultrasound-Guided Normal saline plus steroid hydrodissection group and Ultrasound-Guided normal saline alone hydrodissection group in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), and to determine their clinical relevance in relation to treatment outcomes. We performed 60 US-guided hydrodissections Normal saline with and without corticosteroid injections in 51 patients with CTS and evaluated their pre- and post-injection US findings. We categorized these injections into two groups based on the normal saline plus corticosteroid (steroid group). normal saline (control group) and we also recorded clinical data including gender, age, side of injection, BW, and the duration of pre-injection CTS related discomfort. The outcomes were measured using the visual analog scale was assigned to assess the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes were assessed using the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire, cross-sectional area of the median nerve, and electrophysiological studies. The assessment was performed prior to injection, and 1, 3, and 6 months' post-injection, and the symptom relief for the patients receiving normal saline and steroid injection were compared. We compared hydrodissections with normal saline and corticosteroid injections the clinical data, pre injection CSA-MN at the inlet of the carpal tunnel, and pre-injection BCTQ scores showed no significant intergroup differences (p > 0.05). All patients (data from 30 wrists in each group) completed the study. Compared both the control group, at all post-injection time points, both groups had a significant reduction in pain and disability, improvement on electrophysiological response measures, and decreased cross-sectional area of the median nerve. Our study reveals that ultrasound-guided Normal saline with and without corticosteroid hydrodissection has therapeutic effect in patients CTS. Nerve hydrodissection was shown to be potentially beneficial for CTS patients' pre-surgery. Hydrodissection is a simple, minimally invasive procedure that can be performed using only NS. In addition, compared to blind injection, hydrodissection under ultrasound guidance can lower the chances of nerve injury.

Percutaneous Cholecystostomy and Hydrodissection in Radiofrequency Ablation of Liver Subcapsular Leiomyosarcoma Metastasis Adjacent to the Gallbladder: Protective Effect.

Uterine leiomyosarcoma is an uncommon pathology, predominantly found in aged population. Patients with metastatic disease have poor survival and therapy mainly consists of palliative systemic chemotherapy. However, more aggressive strategies such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) may benefit patients with limited secondary disease. RFA is considered a simple and safe modality for treatment of hepatic lesions. The benefits related to RFA include low morbidity, short hospital stay and the possibility to repeat the procedure when necessary due to recurrences. However, minor and major complications related to mechanical and thermal damage may occur, especially in cases of tumors adjacent to extrahepatic organs and those at subcapsular position. This case report shows a successful RFA of two hepatic subcapsular leiomyosarcoma metastases neighbouring the gallbladder, without a safe cleavage plane from it. Combined hydrodissection, percutaneous cholecystostomy and continuous irrigation were performed as effective techniques to prevent thermal injury. Clinical and radiological follow up demonstrates no local complication.

Resultado con hidrodisección del paratendón del tendón rotuliano, en reconstrucción del ligamento cruzado anterior de rodilla / Result of hydrodissection of the paratendon of the patellar tendon during bone-tendon-bone graft reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament

Objetivo: evaluar el efecto clínico-funcional de la hidrodisección del paratendón en el periodo posoperatorio de pacientes sometidos a reconstrucción de ligamento cruzado anterior, para lo cual se midió funcionalidad de la rodilla, dolor, extensión y flexión. Material y métodos: estudio clínico no controlado realizado en el Hospital de Ortopedia “Victorio de la Fuente Narváez”, Unidad de Medicina de Alta Especialidad “Magdalena de las Salinas”, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, en el que se incluyeron pacientes en quienes se efectuó injerto hueso-tendón-hueso, 22 con hidrodisección del paratendón y 23 sin hidrodisección. Resultados: el grupo con hidrodisección estuvo integrado por 20 hombre y dos mujeres, y el grupo sin hidrodisección, por 22 hombres y una mujer (p = 0.581); edad de 29 ± 4.6 años vs. 26 ± 6.2 años (0.946); peso de 68 ± 8.8 kg vs. 72 ± 6.2 kg; (p = 0.190); altura de 160 ± 4.8 cm vs. 162 ± 7.5 cm; (p = 0.909); lado afectado, derecho 5 vs. 5, izquierdo 17 vs. 18 (p = 0.937); puntuación en la Escala de Valoración de la Sociedad de Rodilla, 84 ± 4 vs. 70 ± 8; evaluación del dolor mediante EVA a los 10 días, 3.7 ± 1.6 vs. 6.2 ± 1.4; y a las cuatro semanas, 1.3 ± 1.6 vs. 4.1 ± 2.1 (p < 0.001); flexión 95 ± 6.7 grados vs. 86 ± 6.1 grados (p < 0.001). Conclusiones: en el periodo posoperatorio mediato (10 días y cuatro semanas), con la hidrodisección disminuyó el dolor y aumentaron los rangos de movilidad; la rehabilitación de inicio se lleva cabo con menor dificultad.

BACKGROUND: We undertook this study to evaluate the clinical and functional effect of hydrodissetion of the paratendon in the postoperative period of patients submitted to surgery of reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament. METHODS: A non-controlled clinical study was conducted at the Unidad de Alta Especialidad de Ortopedia y Traumatología [quot ]Magdalena de las Salinas,[quot ] Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City. Twenty two patients and 23 controls were included. Surgical intervention consisted of a bone-tendon-bone technique with hydrodissection and without hydrodissection of the paratendon. RESULTS: The following results were obtained: functionality of the knee, pain, extension and flexion. Male: 20 vs. 22; female: 2 vs. 1 (p = 0.581), age: 29 +/- 4.6 years vs. 26 +/- 6.2 (0.946); weight: 68 +/- 8.8 vs. 72 +/- 6.2 (p = 0.190); height: 1.60 m +/- 4.8 vs. 1.62 m +/- 7.5 (p =0.909). Side: right: 5 vs. 5; left: 17 vs. 18 (p = 0.937). Evaluation scale of Knee Index: 84 +/- 4 vs. 70 +/- 8; pain: 10 days: 3.7 +/- 1.6 vs. 6.2 +/- 1.4, 4 weeks: 1.3 +/- 1.6 vs. 4.1 +/- 2.1 (p <0.001) flexion: 95 +/- 6.7 degrees vs. 86 +/- 6.1 degrees (p <0.001) group of hydrodissection vs. no hydrodissection, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In the immediate postoperative period (4 weeks), pain is diminished and range of mobility increases as a result of the decrease of pain.