Predictors of appropriate therapies delivered by the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in patients with coronary artery disease during long-term period.

This prospective study aimed to investigate the ability of cardiac autonomic nervous system (CANS) activity assessment to predict appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) during long-term follow-up period. We enrolled patients with CAD and ICD implantation indications that included both secondary and primary prevention of sudden cardiac death. Before ICD implantation CANS was assessed by using heart rate variability (HRV), myocardium scintigraphy with 123I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (123I-MIBG) and erythrocyte membranes ß-adrenoreactivity (EMA). The study's primary endpoint was the documentation of appropriate ICD therapy. Of 45 (100.0%) patients, 15 (33.3%) had appropriate ICD therapy during 36 months follow-up period. Patients with appropriate ICD therapy were likely to have a higher summed 123I-MIBG score delayed (p < 0.001) and lower 123I-MIBG washout rate (p = 0.008) indicators. These parameters were independently associated with endpoint in univariable and multivariable logistic regression. We created a logistic equation and calculated a cut-off value. The resulting ROC curve revealed a discriminative ability with AUC of 0.933 (95% confidence interval 0.817-0.986; sensitivity 100.00%; specificity 93.33%). Combined CANS activity assessment is useful in prediction of appropriate ICD therapy in patients with CAD during long-term follow-up period after device implantation.

Predicting postinfarct ventricular tachycardia by integrating cardiac MRI and advanced computational reentrant pathway analysis.

BACKGROUND: Implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) implantation can protect against sudden cardiac death after myocardial infarction. However, improved risk stratification for device requirement is still needed. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to improve assessment of postinfarct ventricular electropathology and prediction of appropriate ICD therapy by combining late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and advanced computational modeling. METHODS: ADAS 3D LV (ADAS LV Medical, Barcelona, Spain) and custom-made software were used to generate 3-dimensional patient-specific ventricular models in a prospective cohort of patients with a myocardial infarction (N = 40) having undergone LGE imaging before ICD implantation. Corridor metrics and 3-dimensional surface features were computed from LGE images. The Virtual Induction and Treatment of Arrhythmias (VITA) framework was applied to patient-specific models to comprehensively probe the vulnerability of the scar substrate to sustaining reentrant circuits. Imaging and VITA metrics, related to the numbers of induced ventricular tachycardias and their corresponding round trip times (RTTs), were compared with ICD therapy during follow-up. RESULTS: Patients with an event (n = 17) had a larger interface between healthy myocardium and scar and higher VITA metrics. Cox regression analysis demonstrated a significant independent association with an event: interface (hazard ratio [HR] 2.79; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.44-5.44; P < .01), unique ventricular tachycardias (HR 1.67; 95% CI 1.04-2.68; P = .03), mean RTT (HR 2.14; 95% CI 1.11-4.12; P = .02), and maximum RTT (HR 2.13; 95% CI 1.19-3.81; P = .01). CONCLUSION: A detailed quantitative analysis of LGE-based scar maps, combined with advanced computational modeling, can accurately predict ICD therapy and could facilitate the early identification of high-risk patients in addition to left ventricular ejection fraction.

The impact of supraventricular arrhythmias on the outcomes of guideline-compliant implantable cardioverter defibrillator programming.

INTRODUCTION: Several implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) programming strategies are applied to minimize ICD therapy, especially unnecessary therapies from supraventricular arrhythmias (SVA). However, it remains unknown whether these optimal programming recommendations only benefit those with SVAs or have any detrimental effects from delayed therapy on those without SVAs. This study aims to assess the impact of SVA on the outcomes of ICD programming based on 2015 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement and 2019 focused update on optimal ICD programming and testing guidelines. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent ICD insertion for primary prevention were classified into four groups based on SVA status and ICD programming: (1) guideline-concordant group (GC) with SVA, (2) GC without SVA, (3) nonguideline concordant group (NGC) with SVA, and (4) NGC without SVA. Cox proportional hazard models were analyzed for freedom from ICD therapies, shock, and mortality. RESULTS: Seven hundred and seventy-two patients (median age, 64 years) were enrolled. ICD therapies were the most frequent in NGC with SVA (24.0%), followed by NGC without SVA (19.9%), GC without SVA (11.6%), and GC with SVA (8.1%). Guideline concordant programming was associated with 68% ICD therapy reduction (HR 0.32, p = .007) and 67% ICD shock reduction (HR 0.33, p = .030) in SVA patients and 44% ICD therapy reduction in those without SVA (HR 0.56, p = .030). CONCLUSION: Programming ICDs in primary prevention patients based on current guidelines reduces therapy burden without increasing mortality in both SVA and non-SVA patients. A greater magnitude of reduced ICD therapy was found in those with supraventricular arrhythmias.

Improved outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator in systolic heart failure: Analysis of the Japan cardiac device treatment registry database.

Background: Temporal change in outcomes of heart failure patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D) is unknown. Methods: We assess outcomes and underlying heart diseases of patients receiving CRT-D with analyzing database of the Japan cardiac device treatment registry (JCDTR) at the implantation year 2011-2015 and New JCDTR at the implantation year 2018-2021. Results: Proportion of nonischemic heart diseases was about 70% in both the groups (JCDTR: 69%; New JCDTR: 72%). Cardiac sarcoidosis increased with the rate of 5% in the JCDTR to 9% in the New JCDTR group. During an average follow-up of 21 months, death from any cause occurred in 167 of 906 patients in the JCDTR group (18%) and 79 of 611 patients in the New JCDTR group (13%) (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] in the New JCDTR group, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55-0.94; p = .017). The superiority was mainly driven by reduction in the risk of noncardiac death. With regard to appropriate and inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy, there was a significant reduction in the New JCDTR group versus the JCDTR group (aHR in the New JCDTR group, 0.76; 95% CI: 0.59-0.98; p = .032 for appropriate ICD therapy; aHR in the New JCDTR group, 0.24; 95% CI: 0.12-0.50; p < .0001 for inappropriate ICD therapy). Conclusions: All-cause mortality was reduced in CRT-D patients implanted during 2018-2021 compared to those during 2011-2015, with a significant reduction in noncardiac death.

Benefit of primary and secondary prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator in elderly patients.

BACKGROUND: The benefit of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) in elderly patients has been questioned. In the present study, we aimed to analyse the outcome of patients of different age groups with ICD implantation. METHODS: We included all patients who received an ICD in our hospital from 2011 to 2020. Primary endpoints were (1) death from any cause and (2) appropriate ICD therapy (antitachycardia pacing/shock). A "benefit of ICD implantation" was defined as appropriate ICD therapy before death from any cause/or survival. "No benefit of ICD implantation" was defined as death from any cause without prior appropriate ICD therapy. RESULTS: A total of 422 patients received an ICD (primary prophylaxis n = 323, secondary prophylaxis n = 99). At the time of implantation, 35 patients (8%) were >80 years and 106 patients were >75 years (25%). During the study period of 4.2 ± 3 years, benefit of ICD occurred in 89 patients (21%) and no benefit in 84 patients (20%). In primary prevention, the proportion of patients who had a benefit from ICD implantation decreased with increasing age, and there were no patients who benefited from ICD therapy in the group of patients >80 years. In secondary prophylaxis, the proportion of patients with a benefit from ICD implantation ranged from 20% to 30% in all age groups. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that the indication of primary prophylactic ICD in elderly and very old patients should be critically assessed. On the other hand, no patient should be denied secondary prophylactic ICD implantation because of age.

Right ventricular systolic function as a predictor of appropriate ICD therapy.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that right ventricular dysfunction is associated with a significantly increased risk of sudden cardiac death. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association of the right ventricular fractional area change (RVFAC) and appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy to determine the cutoff value of the RVFAC. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent initial ICD implantations except those with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, Brugada syndrome, and long QT syndrome were retrospectively enrolled. The primary endpoint was defined as any appropriate ICD therapy. The right ventricular dimensions and function on transthoracic echocardiography were measured for analysis. RESULTS: In total, 172 patients (60.3 ± 13.6 years, 131 males) were enrolled. Ninety patients received an ICD as a secondary prophylaxis. The mean LV ejection fraction and RVFAC were 38.3 ± 14.3% and 35.8 ± 8.8%, respectively. Regarding appropriate ICD therapy events, the best cutoff value of the RVFAC was 34.8%, while 74 patients had an RVFAC < 34.8%. Regarding the primary endpoint, the hazard ratio of a low RVFAC was 2.73 (95% CI 1.46-5.12, P < 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, a low RVFAC was an independent predictor of appropriate ICD therapy (HR: 3.40, 95% CI 1.74-6.64, P < 0.01). The secondary prophylactic cohort with a low RVFAC had the highest incidence of appropriate ICD therapy. Among the patients with RV dysfunction, the RVFAC normalized in 39% of patients during follow-up. This recovered RVFAC group had a significantly lower incidence of appropriate ICD therapy than the unrecovered RVFAC group (P = 0.043). CONCLUSION: A low RVFAC might be associated with increased appropriate ICD therapy.

Remote Monitoring in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-First Experience in Romania with a CRT Virtual Ward.

BACKGROUND: Remote monitoring (RM) is becoming a standard of care for patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). This technology combines the use of pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) and wireless communication to provide physicians with continuous, real-time information on the patient's cardiac activity. The purpose of the study was to evaluate if the remote monitoring technology in the follow-up CRT patients is feasible and safe. METHODS: A total of nine patients were enrolled in the study, implanted with a CRT system with wireless transmission capabilities. Immediately after the procedure received the RM, were enrolled in the virtual clinic and instructed by the doctor how to use the device at home. Regular virtual transmissions were made automatically every 3 weeks, respecting optimal transmission conditions. The accumulation of fluid in the lungs, atrial or ventricular tachyarrhythmia together with system integrity automatically activate alerts. RESULTS: One hundred and one transmissions were collected and analyzed from the virtual ward. Average follow-up was 7.7±4.8 months, longest follow-up was 18 months. None of the patients experienced complications during the study period, with three of them being follow-up solely through telemetric means by implanting physician. Treatment optimization was successfully conducted via phone consultations, when necessary, without any adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study suggest that RM could be integrated into routine CRT management protocols, enhancing patients care and resource utilization.

Preventing Deadly Complications of Cardiac Sarcoidosis.

Cardiac sarcoidosis is a rare complication of pulmonary sarcoidosis, causing granulomatous inflammation of the myocardium, ultimately resulting in infiltrative cardiomyopathy. Through fibrotic inflammation, cardiac sarcoidosis predisposes patients to multiple complications, such as conduction abnormalities, ventricular arrhythmias, heart failure, and sudden cardiac death. Due to the adverse prognosis of conduction abnormalities in these patients, dual chamber implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) therapy is beneficial in reducing mortality and morbidity. Early ICD placement can prevent further immune-driven fibrotic conduction complications. Here we present a case of a 50-year-old female who underwent ICD placement due to conduction abnormalities secondary to cardiac sarcoidosis.

Follow-up of CRT-D patients downgraded to CRT-P at the time of generator exchange.

Background: Some patients with cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) experience super-response (LVEF improvements to ≥50%). At generator exchange (GE), downgrading (DG) from CRT-defibrillator (CRT-D) to CRT-pacemaker (CRT-P) could be an option for these patients on primary prevention ICD indication and no required ICD therapies. Long-term data on arrhythmic events in super-responders is scarce. Methods: CRT-D patients with LVEF improvement to ≥50% at GE were identified in four large centres for retrospective analysis. Mortality, significant ventricular tachyarrhythmia and appropriate ICD-therapy were determined, and patient analysis was split into two groups (downgraded to CRT-P or not). Results: Sixty-six patients (53% male, 26% coronary artery disease) on primary prevention were followed for a median of 129 months [IQR: 101-155] after implantation. 27 (41%) patients were downgraded to CRT-P at GE after a median of 68 [IQR: 58-98] months (LVEF 54% ± 4%). The other 39 (59%) continued with CRT-D therapy (LVEF 52% ± 6%). No cardiac death or significant arrhythmia occurred in the CRT-P group (median follow-up (FU) 38 months [IQR: 29-53]). Three appropriate ICD-therapies occurred in the CRT-D group [median FU 70 months (IQR: 39-97)]. Annualized event-rates after DG/GE were 1.5%/year and 1.0%/year in the CRT-D group and the whole cohort, respectively. Conclusions: No significant tachyarrhythmia were detected in the patients downgraded to CRT-P during follow-up. However, three events were observed in the CRT-D group. Whilst downgrading CRT-D patients is an option, a small residual risk for arrhythmic events remains and decisions regarding downgrade should be made on a case-by-case basis.

Early ganglion stellate blockade as part of two-step treatment algorithm suppresses electrical storm and need for intubation.

BACKGROUND: For the treatment of patients with electrical storm (ES), we established a two-step algorithm comprising standard anti-arrhythmic measures and early ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion blockade (SGB). In this single-center study, we evaluated the short-term efficacy of the algorithm and tested the hypothesis that early SGB might prevent the need for intubations. METHODS: Overall, we analyzed data for 70 ES events in 59 patients requiring SGB (mean age 67.7 ± 12.4 years, 80% males, left ventricular ejection fraction 30.0% ± 9.1%), all with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). RESULTS: The mean time from ES onset to SGB was 13.2 ± 12.3 hours. Percentage and mean absolute reduction in shocks at 48 hours after SGB reached 86.8% (-6.3 shocks), and anti-tachycardiac pacing (ATP) declined by 65.9% (-51.1 ATPs; all P < 0.001). Patients with the highest sustained ventricular arrhythmia (VA) burden (shocks ≥10/48 h; ATPs 10-99/48 h and ≥100/48 h) experienced the highest percentage decrease in ICD therapy (shocks -99.1%; ATPs -92.1% and -100.0%, respectively). For clinical response by defined criteria and two outcome periods (1/no sustained VA ≤48 hours post SGB, and 2/no ICD shock or <3 ATPs/day from day 3 to discharge/catheter ablation/day 8), 75.7% and 76.1% experienced complete response, respectively. Catecholamine support, no/low-dose ß-blocker therapy, polymorphic/mixed-type VA, and baseline sinus rhythm versus atrial fibrillation were more frequent in patients with early arrhythmia recurrence. Temporary Horner's syndrome occurred in 67.1%, and no other adverse events were recorded. Intubation and general anesthesia during and after SGB were not needed. CONCLUSION: The presented two-step algorithm for treating ES proved efficacious and safe. The results support implementation of early SGB in routine ES management.

Programming of implantable cardioverter defibrillators for primary prevention: outcomes at centers with high vs. low concordance with guidelines.

BACKGROUND: While ICD therapy reduction programming strategies are recommended in current multi-society guidelines, concerns remain about a possible trade-off between the benefits of ICD therapy reduction and failure to treat episodes of ventricular arrhythmias. The study is to evaluate the outcomes of primary prevention patients followed in centers with high and low concordance with the 2015 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement and 2019 focused update on optimal ICD programming and testing guidelines. METHODS: Consecutive patients with primary prevention ICD implantation from two centers between 2014 and 2016 were included. One center was classified as high guideline concordance center (HGC) with 47% (146/310) of patients with initial ICD concordant with the guidelines, and the other center was classified as low guideline concordance center (LGC) with only 1% (2/178) of patients with guideline-concordant initial ICD programming. Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess risk of first ICD therapy (ATP or shock), first ICD shock, and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 488 patients were included (mean age, 66 ± 13 years). During a mean follow-up of 1.9 ± 0.9 years, patients followed at HGC were 63% less likely to receive any ICD therapy (adjusted HR [aHR] 0.37, 95% CI 0.42-0.99). There were no significant differences in the rate of first ICD shock (aHR 0.72, 95% CI 0.34-1.52) or mortality (aHR 1.19, 95% CI, 0.47-3.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to primary prevention patients followed at LGC, primary prevention ICD patients followed at HGC received a significantly lower rate of ICD therapy, mainly from ATP reduction, without a difference in mortality during follow-up.

Stereotactic body radioablation therapy as an immediate and early term antiarrhythmic palliative therapeutic choice in patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic body radioablation therapy (SBRT) has recently been introduced with the ability to provide ablative energy noninvasively to arrhythmogenic substrate while reducing damage to normal cardiac tissue nearby and minimizing patients' procedural risk. There is still debate regarding whether SBRT has a predominant effect in the early or late period after the procedure. We sought to assess the time course of SBRT's efficacy as well as the value of using a blanking period following a SBRT session. METHODS: Eight patients (mean age 58 ± 14 years) underwent eight SBRT sessions for refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT). SBRT was given using a linear accelerator device with a total dose of 25 Gy to the targeted area. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 8 months, all patients demonstrated VT recurrences; however, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and anti-tachycardia pacing therapies were significantly reduced with SBRT (8.46 to 0.83/per month, p = 0.047; 18.50 to 3.29/per month, p = 0.036, respectively). While analyzing the temporal SBRT outcomes, the 2 weeks to 3 months period demonstrated the most favorable outcomes. After 6 months, one patient was ICD therapy-free and the remaining patients demonstrated VT episodes. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings showed that the SBRT was associated with a marked reduction in the burden of VT and ICD interventions especially during first 3 months. Although SBRT does not seem to succeed complete termination of VT in long-term period, our findings support the strategy that SBRT can be utilized for immediate antiarrhythmic palliation in critically ill patients with otherwise untreatable refractory VT and electrical storm.

Usefulness of the MADIT-ICD Benefit Score in a Large Mixed Patient Cohort of Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death.

Background: Decision-making in primary prevention is not always trivial and many clinical scenarios are not reflected in current guidelines. To help evaluate a patient's individual risk, a new score to predict the benefit of an implantable defibrillator (ICD) for primary prevention, the MADIT-ICD benefit score, has recently been proposed. The score tries to predict occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias and non-arrhythmic death based on data from four previous MADIT trials. We aimed at examining its usefulness in a large single-center register of S-ICD patients with various underlying cardiomyopathies. Methods and results: All S-ICD patients with a primary preventive indication for ICD implantation from our large single-center database were included in the analysis (n = 173). During a follow-up of 1227 ± 978 days, 27 patients developed sustained ventricular arrhythmias, while 6 patients died for non-arrhythmic reasons. There was a significant correlation for patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) (n = 29, p = 0.04) to the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmia. However, the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias could not sufficiently be predicted by the MADIT-ICD VT/VF score (p = 0.3) in patients with (n = 142, p = 0.19) as well as patients without structural heart disease (n = 31, p = 0.88) and patients with LV-EF < 35%. Of the risk factors included in the risk score calculation, only non-sustained ventricular tachycardias were significantly associated with sustained ventricular arrhythmias (p = 0.02). Of note, non-arrhythmic death could effectively be predicted by the proposed non-arrhythmic mortality score as part of the benefit score (p = 0.001, r = 0.3) also mainly driven by ICM patients. Age, diabetes mellitus, and a BMI < 23 kg/m2 were key predictors of non-arrhythmic death implemented in the score. Conclusion: The MADIT-ICD benefit score adds a new option to evaluate expected benefit of ICD implantation for primary prevention. In a large S-ICD cohort of primary prevention, the value of the score was limited to patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Future research should evaluate the performance of the score in different subgroups and compare it to other risk scores to assess its value for daily clinical practice.

Effectiveness of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in Patients With Non-Ischemic Heart Failure With Systolic Dysfunction　- Subanalysis of the Nippon Storm Study.

BACKGROUND: The prospective observational Nippon Storm Study aggregated clinical data from Japanese patients receiving implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy. This study investigated the usefulness of prophylactic ICD therapy in patients with non-ischemic heart failure (NIHF) enrolled in the study.Methods and Results: We analyzed 540 NIHF patients with systolic dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction <50%). Propensity score matching was used to select patient subgroups for comparison; 126 patients were analyzed in each of the primary (PP) and secondary (SP) prophylaxis groups. The incidence of appropriate ICD therapy during follow-up in the PP and SP groups was 21.4% and 31.7%, respectively (P=0.044). The incidence of electrical storm (ES) was higher in SP than PP patients (P=0.024). Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed that increased serum creatinine in SP patients (hazard ratio [HR] 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.33; P=0.013) and anemia in PP patients (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.86-0.98; P=0.008) increased the likelihood of appropriate ICD therapy, whereas long-lasting atrial fibrillation in PP patients (HR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.45-0.91], P=0.013) decreased that likelihood. CONCLUSIONS: In propensity score-matched Japanese NIHF patients, the incidence of appropriate ICD therapy and ES was significantly higher in SP than PP patients. Impaired renal function in SP patients and anemia in PP patients increased the likelihood of appropriate ICD therapy, whereas long-lasting atrial fibrillation reduced that likelihood in PP patients.

Inappropriately long post-ventricular atrial blanking leading to 'unnecessary' defibrillator discharge.

A 55-year-old lady with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) was referred for multiple implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shocks. Stored electrograms (EGM) revealed atrial flutter (AFL) with A > V. Morphology match was good and RR-intervals were irregular. Despite all these, the dual-chamber-ICD (Abbott medical) classified this as ventricular tachycardia (VT-2) via V > A algorithm where it did not analyze morphology/stability and delivered therapy. Anti-tachycardia-pacing (ATP) was delivered which induced a true VT (rate in VF-zone) and immediate shock was delivered. It was hence appropriate but an 'unnecessary' shock. The offender was found to be an inappropriately programmed long post-ventricular atrial-blanking (PVAB) of 200 ms which led to undersensing of several atrial electrograms, falsely making V > A during a clear AFL.

Impact of Successful Chronic Coronary Total Occlusion Recanalization on Recurrence of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Recipients for Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (VACTO PCI Study).

BACKGROUND: Coronary chronic total occlusion lesions (CTOs) confer an increased risk of arrhythmic events among patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) carriers, however the impact of CTO recanalization in this population remains unassessed. AIMS: Evaluate the impact of CTOs percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) on arrhythmic events. METHODS: Patients with ICM and ICD from the VACTO I-II registries: patients with medically treated CTO (CTO-OMT group) and without CTO (no-CTO group) were compared after inverse-probability-weighting adjustment (IPWT) with a similar population of consecutive patients undergoing CTO-PCI. The primary endpoint was appropriate ICD therapy. The secondary endpoint was all-cause mortality. RESULTS: The total of 622 patients (mean age 67 ± 10 years, mean left ventricular ejection fraction 36 ± 11%) included in the analysis was composed by: CTO-PCI patients n = 113, CTO-OMT patients n = 286, no-CTO patients n = 223. In the CTO-PCI group, compared to the CTO-OMT group, 5-year Kaplan Meier estimates for appropriate ICD therapy (20.4% vs. 56.4%, IPW-adjusted HR: 0.45, 95% CI 0.29-0.71) and mortality (8.8% vs. 23%, IPW-adjusted HR: 0.43, 95% CI 0.22-0.85) were lower, driven by infarct related artery CTO (IRA-CTO) PCI, while similar to those occurring in the no-CTO group. CONCLUSIONS: In this large population, those with CTO receiving PCI had lower arrhythmic event rates and lower mortality compared to the CTO-OMT group, while showing an event rate similar to no-CTO patients. Sensitivity analyses suggest that the beneficial effect on the arrhythmic outcome was driven by IRA-CTO revascularization. CLASSIFICATION: Chronic total occlusion.

Impact of Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair Using the MitraClipTM System on Ventricular Arrhythmias and ICD Therapies.

Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) using the MitraClip™ device has been established as a suitable alternative to mitral valve surgery in patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) and high or prohibitive surgical risk. Only limited information regarding the impact of TEER on ventricular arrhythmias (VA) has been reported. The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of TEER using the MitraClipTM device on the burden of VA and ICD (Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator) therapies. Among 600 MitraClipTM implantations performed in our clinic between September 2009 and October 2018, we identified 86 patients with successful TEER and an active implantable cardiac device (pacemaker, ICD, CRT-P/D (Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Pacemaker/Defibrillator)) eligible for retrospective VA analyses. These patients presented with mainly functional MR (81.4%) and severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (mean LVEF 22.1% ± 10.3%). The observation period comprised 456 ± 313 days before and 424 ± 287 days after TEER. The burden of ventricular arrhythmias (sustained ventricular tachycardia (sVT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF)) was significantly reduced after TEER (0.85 ± 3.47 vs. 0.43 ± 2.03 events per patient per month, p = 0.01). Furthermore, the rate of ICD therapies (anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) and ICD shock) decreased significantly after MitraClipTM implantation (1.0 ± 3.87 vs. 0.32 ± 1.41, p = 0.014). However, reduction of VA burden did not result in improved two-year survival in this patient cohort with severely reduced LVEF. Mitral valve TEER using the MitraClip™ device was associated with a significant reduction of ventricular arrhythmias and ICD therapies.

The DAPA Trial in the Context of Previous Prophylactic ICD Landmark Trials.

In patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), an arrhythmogenic milieu is created by a complex interplay between myocardial scarring (assessed by cardiac MRI) and multiple other factors (ventricular ectopy, ischaemia and autonomic imbalance), favouring the occurrence of arrhythmic sudden cardiac death (SCD). Currently, a dynamic and robust model of dichotomised SCD risk assessment after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is lacking, underlining the urgent need for further refinement of the widely accepted and guidelines-based criteria (ischaemic cardiomyopathy, LVEF ≤35%) for primary prevention. This review addresses the potential additional value of the recently published Defibrillator After Primary Angioplasty (DAPA) trial results. The DAPA trial conveys important messages and provides novel perspectives regarding left ventricular function post-primary PCI as an (early) risk marker for SCD and the impact of prophylactic ICD implantation on survival in this cohort. In the context of other previous primary prevention trials, DAPA was the first trial including only ST-elevation MI patients all treated with acute PCI.

Comparable Efficacy in Ischemic and Non-Ischemic ICD Recipients for the Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death.

(1) Background: In patients suffering from heart failure, the main causes of death are either hemodynamic failure, or ventricular arrhythmias. The only tool to significantly reduce arrhythmic sudden death is the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), but not all patients benefit to the same extent from these devices. (2) Methods: The primary outcome of this single-center study was defined as cardiovascular death in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic heart failure who have benefited from ICD therapy. The secondary outcomes were death from any cause, sudden cardiac death, ICD-related therapies (appropriate antitachycardia pacing or shock therapy for ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation) and recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. (3) Results: A total of 403 consecutive ICD recipients-symptomatic heart failure patients with ICD for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death-were included retrospectively: 59% ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICMP) and 41% non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICMP) patients. Within a median follow-up period of 36 months, the incidence of cardiovascular mortality was not significantly different in patients with NICMP and ICMP: the primary outcome had occurred in 9 patients (5.4%) in the NICMP group and in 14 patients (5.9%) in the ICMP group (hazard ratio 1; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45 to 2.28; p = 0.97). All-cause mortality occurred in 14 of 166 patients (8.4%) in the NICMP group and 18 of 237 patients (7.6%) in the ICMP group. Sudden cardiac death occurred in two patients (1.2%) in the NICMP group and in four patients (1.7%) in the ICMP group (hazard ratio 0.71; 95% CI, 0.13 to 3.88; p = 0.69). The rate of appropriate device therapies was comparable in both groups. (4) Conclusions: In this study, ICD implantation for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death in patients with symptomatic systolic heart failure was associated with similar rates of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in patients with ischemic heart disease, and in patients with heart failure from other causes. NICMP and ICMP showed comparable rates of recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias and appropriate ICD therapies.