Diagnostic accuracy of the IFN-γ release assay using RD1 immunodominant T-cell antigens for diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis.

The diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) poses a significant challenge, with controversies surrounding the accuracy of IFN-γ release assays (IGRAs). This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of RD1 immunodominant T-cell antigens, including ESAT-6, CFP-10, PE35, and PPE68 proteins, for immunodiagnosis of EPTB. Twenty-nine patients with EPTB were enrolled, and recombinant PE35, PPE68, ESAT-6, and CFP-10 proteins were evaluated in a 3-day Whole Blood Assay. IFN-γ levels were measured using a Human IFN-γ ELISA kit, and the QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) test was performed. Predominantly, the patients were of Afghan (62%, n = 18) and Iranian (38%, n = 11) nationalities. Eighteen individuals tested positive for QFT-Plus, accounting for 62% of the cases. The positivity rate for IGRA, using each distinct recombinant protein (ESAT-6, PPE68, PE35, and CFP-10), was 72% (n = 21) for every protein tested. Specifically, among Afghan patients, the positivity rates for QFT-Plus and IGRA using ESAT-6, PPE68, PE35, and CFP-10 were 66.7%, 83.3%, 83.3%, 77.8%, and 88.9%, respectively. In contrast, among Iranian patients, the positivity rates for the same antigens were 54.5%, 54.5%, 54.5%, 63.6%, and 45.5%, respectively. In conclusion, our study highlights the potential of IGRA testing utilizing various proteins as a valuable diagnostic tool for EPTB. Further research is needed to elucidate the underlying factors contributing to these disparities and to optimize diagnostic strategies for EPTB in diverse populations.

Determination of latent tuberculosis infection from plasma samples via label-free SERS sensors and machine learning.

Effective diagnostic tools for screening of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) are lacking. We aim to investigate the performance of LTBI diagnostic approaches using label-free surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS). We used 1000 plasma samples from Northeast Thailand. Fifty percent of the samples had tested positive in the interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) and 50 % negative. The SERS investigations were performed on individually prepared protein specimens using the Raman-mapping technique over a 7 × 7 grid area under measurement conditions that took under 10 min to complete. The machine-learning analysis approaches were optimized for the best diagnostic performance. We found that the SERS sensors provide 81 % accuracy according to train-test split analysis and 75 % for LOOCV analysis from all samples, regardless of the batch-to-batch variation of the sample sets and SERS chip. The accuracy increased to 93 % when the logistic regression model was used to analyze the last three batches of samples, following optimization of the sample collection, SERS chips, and database. We demonstrated that SERS analysis with machine learning is a potential diagnostic tool for LTBI screening.

Assessing the Diagnostic Performance of New Commercial Interferon-γ Release Assays for Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: We compared 6 new interferon-γ release assays (IGRAs; hereafter index tests: QFT-Plus, QFT-Plus CLIA, QIAreach, Wantai TB-IGRA, Standard E TB-Feron, and T-SPOT.TB/T-Cell Select) with World Health Organization (WHO)-endorsed tests for tuberculosis infection (hereafter reference tests). METHODS: Data sources (1 January 2007-18 August 2021) were Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and manufacturers' data. Cross-sectional and cohort studies comparing the diagnostic performance of index and reference tests were selected. The primary outcomes of interest were the pooled differences in sensitivity and specificity between index and reference tests. The certainty of evidence (CoE) was summarized using the GRADE approach. RESULTS: Eighty-seven studies were included (44 evaluated the QFT-Plus, 4 QFT-Plus CLIA, 3 QIAreach, 26 TB-IGRA, 10 TB-Feron [1 assessing the QFT-Plus], and 1 T-SPOT.TB/T-Cell Select). Compared to the QFT-GIT, QFT Plus's sensitivity was 0.1 percentage points lower (95% confidence interval [CI], -2.8 to 2.6; CoE: moderate), and its specificity 0.9 percentage points lower (95% CI, -1.0 to -.9; CoE: moderate). Compared to QFT-GIT, TB-IGRA's sensitivity was 3.0 percentage points higher (95% CI, -.2 to 6.2; CoE: very low), and its specificity 2.6 percentage points lower (95% CI, -4.2 to -1.0; CoE: low). Agreement between the QFT-Plus CLIA and QIAreach with QFT-Plus was excellent (pooled κ statistics of 0.86 [95% CI, .78 to .94; CoE: low]; and 0.96 [95% CI, .92 to 1.00; CoE: low], respectively). The pooled κ statistic comparing the TB-Feron and the QFT-Plus or QFT-GIT was 0.85 (95% CI, .79 to .92; CoE: low). CONCLUSIONS: The QFT-Plus and the TB-IGRA have very similar sensitivity and specificity as WHO-approved IGRAs.

Analysis of the diagnostic efficacy of the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube assay for preoperative differential diagnosis of spinal tuberculosis.

Background: Differential diagnosis of spinal tuberculosis is important for the clinical management of patients, especially in populations with spinal bone destruction. There are few effective tools for preoperative differential diagnosis in these populations. The QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) test has good sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of tuberculosis, but its efficacy in preoperative diagnosis of spinal tuberculosis has rarely been investigated. Method: A total of 123 consecutive patients with suspected spinal tuberculosis hospitalized from March 20, 2020, to April 10, 2022, were included, and the QFT-GIT test was performed on each patient. We retrospectively collected clinical data from these patients. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted with the TB Ag-Nil values. The cutoff point was calculated from the ROC curve of 61 patients in the study cohort, and the diagnostic validity of the cutoff point was verified in a new cohort of 62 patients. The correlations between TB Ag-Nil values and other clinical characteristics of the patients were analyzed. Results: Of the 123 patients included in the study, 51 had confirmed tuberculosis, and 72 had non-tuberculosis disease (AUC=0.866, 95% CI: 0.798-0.933, P<0.0001). In patients with spinal tuberculosis, the QFT-GIT test sensitivity was 92.16% (95% CI: 80.25%-97.46%), and the specificity was 67.14% (95% CI: 54.77%-77.62%). The accuracy of diagnostic tests in the validation cohort increased from 77.42% to 80.65% when a new cutoff point was selected (1.58 IU/mL) from the ROC curve of the study cohort. The TB Ag-Nil values in tuberculosis patients were correlated with the duration of the patients' disease (r=0.4148, P=0.0025). Conclusion: The QFT-GIT test is an important test for preoperative differential diagnosis of spinal tuberculosis with high sensitivity but low specificity. The diagnostic efficacy of the QFT-GIT test can be significantly improved via application of a new threshold (1.58 IU/mL), and the intensity of the QFT-GIT test findings in spinal tuberculosis may be related to the duration of a patient's disease.

Significance of detecting the levels of miR-29a, survivin and interferon gamma release assay in patients with lung cancer and tuberculosis.

BACKGROUND: When lung cancer is combined with concurrent tuberculosis (TB), it increases the difficulty of diagnosis and treatment, leading to missed and/or misdiagnosed cases. OBJECTIVES: To provide reference markers for the clinical diagnosis of patients with lung cancer complicated by active pulmonary TB (APT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The concentration of survivin in diseased tissue, and miR-29a and IGRAs interferon gamma (IFN-γ) in serum were evaluated in 25 patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) complicated by APT, 32 patients with NSCLC and 30 patients with APT. RESULTS: The expression of miR-29a in serum of patients with APT was higher than in patients with NSCLC complicated by APT (least significant difference (LSD)-t = 4.724, p < 0.001), and the NSCLC group (LSD-t = 6.619, p < 0.001). Furthermore, patients with NSCLC complicated by APT had higher miR-29a concentration than the NSCLC group. The rate of positive survivin expression in NSCLC (χ2 = 23.418, p < 0.001) and NSCLC combined with APT group (χ2 = 17.160, p < 0.001) was significantly higher than in patients with APT. The concentration of IFN-γ in serum of the NSCLC complicated by APT group (LSD-t = 2.912, p = 0.004) and the APT group (LSD-t = 4.452, p < 0.001) was higher than in the NSCLC group. The level of IFN-γ in serum of the NSCLC complicated by APT group were higher than in the APT group, but there was no statistical difference. CONCLUSIONS: The levels of MiR-29a, Survivin and IFN-γ was helpful for differential diagnosis of lung cancer and tuberculosis.

Tuberculosis latente: diagnóstico y tratamiento actual / Latent tuberculosis: current diagnosis and treatment

Resumen La infección tuberculosa latente (TL) afecta al 23% de la población y constituye un reservorio de tuberculosis (TBC) ya que 10% progresa hacia una TBC. La TL se reconoce por pruebas como la tuberculina (PPD o TST) y los ensayos de liberación de Interferón gama (IGRAs). La sensibilidad de IGRAs (versión Quantiferon TB Gold plus) es 94% y del PPD 77%. La especificidad del Quantiferon TB Gold Plus es 97% y del PPD 68%. El valor predictivo de progresión a TBC activa de estas pruebas es bajo (PPD: 1,5%, IGRAs: 2,7%) pero mejora en personas de alto riesgo de contraer TBC (PPD: 2,4%, IGRAs: 6,8%). Las personas con pruebas negativas que posteriormente presentan viraje (prueba positiva) tienen mayor riesgo de progresión a TBC activa. Estas pruebas son útiles en el seguimiento de contactos intradomiciliarios, extranjeros de países con altas tasas de TBC, inmunosuprimidos, enfermedad renal crónica, diabetes, silicosis y secuelas pulmonares de TBC no tratada. En la terapia de TL se utiliza isoniazida (H) auto-administrada por plazos de 6 a 12 meses con eficacia protectora de 60% y riesgo de toxicidad hepática de 2% pero con baja adherencia (50-70%). La asociación de H con rifapentina en dosis única semanal durante 12 semanas tiene eficacia de 81%, adherencia de 82% y baja toxicidad hepática (0,4%). Nuevos biomarcadores de TL y vacunas que mejoren la inmunidad en TL se encuentran en estudio. El tratamiento de la TL puede reducir la incidencia de TBC a largo plazo.

Latent tuberculosis infection (LT) affects 23% of the population and constitutes a reservoir of tuberculosis (TB) as 10% progresses to TB. LT is recognized by tests such as tuberculin (PPD or TST) and Interferon gamma release assays (IGRAs). The sensitivity of IGRAs (Quantiferon TB Gold plus version) is 94% and PPD 77%. The specificity of Quantiferon TB Gold Plus is 97% and PPD 68%. The predictive value of progression to active TB of these tests is low (PPD: 1.5%, IGRAs: 2.7%) but improves in people at high risk of contracting TB (PPD: 2.4%, IGRAs: 6.8%). People with negative tests who subsequently turn around (positive) have a higher risk of progression to active TB. These tests are useful in the follow-up of intra-household contacts, foreigners from countries with high rates of TB, immunosuppressed, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, silicosis and pulmonary sequelae of untreated TB. In LT therapy, self-administered isoniazid (H) is used for periods from 6 to 12 months with protective efficacy of 60% and risk of liver toxicity of 2%, but with low adherence (50-70%). The association of H with rifapentine in a single weekly dose for 12 weeks has efficacy of 81%, adherence of 82% and low liver toxicity (0.4%). New LT biomarkers and vaccines that improve immunity in LT are under study. Treatment of LT may reduce the incidence of TB in the long term.

Diagnóstico de la infección tuberculosa en pacientes inmunodeprimidos y/o candidatos a terapias biológicas mediante el uso combinado de dos pruebas IGRA: T-SPOT.TB/QuantiFERON TB Gold In-Tube vs. T-SPOT.TB/QuantiFERON TB Gold Plus / Diagnosis of Tuberculous Infection in Immunosuppressed Patients and/or Candidates for Biologics Using a Combination of 2 IGRA Tests: T-SPOT.TB/QuantiFERON TB Gold In-Tube vs. T-SPOT.TB/QuantiFERON TB Gold Plus

Introducción: El diagnóstico de la infección tuberculosa latente (ITL) mediante IGRA sigue generando debate. La experiencia empleando dos pruebas IGRA de manera simultánea es escasa. El objetivo de este estudio es comparar los resultados de dos versiones de QuantiFERON-TB Gold (In-Tube/Plus) con los de T-SPOT.TB y analizar la eficacia de esta estrategia dual (T-SPOT.TB + QTF) para el diagnóstico de la ITL en población con alguna condición inmunosupresora.Métodos: Estudio prospectivo (mayo 2015-junio 2017) que incluye 2.999 pacientes inmunodeprimidos y/o candidatos a terapias biológicas, a los que se les realizó de manera simultánea dos IGRA: grupo-1 (1.535 pacientes): T-SPOT.TB + QuantiFERON-TB Gold-In-Tube (QTF-GIT); grupo-2 (1.464 pacientes): T-SPOT.TB + QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QTF-Plus).Resultados: La concordancia entre QTF-GIT y T-SPOT.TB fue del 83,19% (κ = 0,532). Las proporciones de resultados positivos, negativos e indeterminados fueron, respectivamente: 14,33 vs. 17,06%; 82,41 vs. 74,46%; y 3,25 vs. 8,46%. La concordancia entre QTF-Plus y T-SPOT.TB fue del 87,56% (κ=0,609). Las proporciones de resultados positivos, negativos e indeterminados fueron, respectivamente: 15,02 vs. 15,36%; 82,92 vs. 79,37%; y 2,04 vs. 5,25%. Las discordancias entre T-SPOT.TB y QTF-Plus fueron del 12,43%, que implicaban que había 103 pacientes positivos y otros 79 pacientes negativos a expensas exclusivamente de uno de los dos IGRA.Conclusiones: Se evidenció una mayor concordancia entre QTF-Plus y T-SPOT.TB que entre QTF-GIT y T-SPOT.TB. Sin embargo, creemos que la proporción de resultados discordantes entre T-SPOT.TB y QTF-Plus es lo suficientemente relevante clínicamente como para justificar el empleo simultáneo de dos IGRA en este grupo específico de pacientes. (AU)

Introduction: The diagnosis of latent tuberculous infection (LTI) by IGRA continues to generate debate. Experience in the simultaneous use of 2 IGRA tests is scant. The aim of this study was to compare the results of 2 versions of QuantiFERON-TB Gold (In-Tube/Plus) with those of T-SPOT.TB, and to analyse the effectiveness of a dual strategy (T-SPOT.TB + QTF) for the diagnosis of LTI in an immunosuppressed population.Methods: We conducted a prospective study (May 2015-June 2017) that included 2,999 immunosuppressed patients and/or candidates for biologics, in whom 2 simultaneous IGRA tests were performed: Group 1 (1535 patients): T-SPOT.TB + QuantiFERON-TB Gold-In-Tube (QTF-GIT); Group 2 (1464 patients): T-SPOT.TB + QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QTF-Plus).Results: The concordance between QTF-GIT and T-SPOT.TB was 83.19% (κ=0.532). The percentage of positive, negative, and indeterminate results were, respectively: 14.33% vs. 17.06%; 82.41% vs. 74.46%; and 3.25% vs. 8.46%. The concordance between QTF-Plus and T-SPOT.TB was 87.56% (κ=0.609). The percentage of positive, negative, and indeterminate results were, respectively: 15.02% vs. 15.36%; 82.92% vs. 79.37%; and 2.04% vs. 5.25%. Discrepancies between T-SPOT.TB and QTF-Plus were 12.43%, suggesting that 103 patients were positive and another 79 were negative due exclusively to 1 of the 2 IGRAs.Conclusions: Greater concordance was found between QTF-Plus and T-SPOT.TB than between QTF-GIT and T-SPOT.TB. However, we believe that the proportion of discrepancies between T-SPOT.TB and QTF-Plus is sufficiently important from a clinical point of view to justify the simultaneous use of 2 IGRA in this specific patient group. (AU)

[Translated article] Diagnosis of tuberculous infection in immunosuppressed patients and/or candidates for biologics using a combination of 2 IGRA tests: T-SPOT.TB/QuantiFERON TB Gold In-Tube vs. T-SPOT.TB/QuantiFERON TB Gold Plus / Diagnóstico de la infección tuberculosa en pacientes inmunodeprimidos y/o candidatos a terapias biológicas mediante el uso combinado de dos pruebas IGRA: T-SPOT.TB/QuantiFERON TB Gold In-Tube vs. T-SPOT.TB/QuantiFERON TB Gold Plus

Introduction: The diagnosis of latent tuberculous infection (LTI) by IGRA continues to generate debate. Experience in the simultaneous use of 2 IGRA tests is scant. The aim of this study was to compare the results of 2 versions of QuantiFERON-TB Gold (In-Tube/Plus) with those of T-SPOT.TB, and to analyse the effectiveness of a dual strategy (T-SPOT.TB + QTF) for the diagnosis of LTI in an immunosuppressed population.Methods: We conducted a prospective study (May 2015-June 2017) that included 2,999 immunosuppressed patients and/or candidates for biologics, in whom 2 simultaneous IGRA tests were performed: Group 1 (1535 patients): T-SPOT.TB + QuantiFERON-TB Gold-In-Tube (QTF-GIT); Group 2 (1464 patients): T-SPOT.TB + QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QTF-Plus).Results: The concordance between QTF-GIT and T-SPOT.TB was 83.19% (κ=0.532). The percentage of positive, negative, and indeterminate results were, respectively: 14.33% vs. 17.06%; 82.41% vs. 74.46%; and 3.25% vs. 8.46%. The concordance between QTF-Plus and T-SPOT.TB was 87.56% (κ=0.609). The percentage of positive, negative, and indeterminate results were, respectively: 15.02% vs. 15.36%; 82.92% vs. 79.37%; and 2.04% vs. 5.25%. Discrepancies between T-SPOT.TB and QTF-Plus were 12.43%, suggesting that 103 patients were positive and another 79 were negative due exclusively to 1 of the 2 IGRAs.Conclusions: Greater concordance was found between QTF-Plus and T-SPOT.TB than between QTF-GIT and T-SPOT.TB. However, we believe that the proportion of discrepancies between T-SPOT.TB and QTF-Plus is sufficiently important from a clinical point of view to justify the simultaneous use of 2 IGRA in this specific patient group. (AU)

Introducción: El diagnóstico de la infección tuberculosa latente (ITL) mediante IGRA sigue generando debate. La experiencia empleando dos pruebas IGRA de manera simultánea es escasa. El objetivo de este estudio es comparar los resultados de dos versiones de QuantiFERON-TB Gold (In-Tube/Plus) con los de T-SPOT.TB y analizar la eficacia de esta estrategia dual (T-SPOT.TB + QTF) para el diagnóstico de la ITL en población con alguna condición inmunosupresora.Métodos: Estudio prospectivo (mayo 2015-junio 2017) que incluye 2.999 pacientes inmunodeprimidos y/o candidatos a terapias biológicas, a los que se les realizó de manera simultánea dos IGRA: grupo-1 (1.535 pacientes): T-SPOT.TB + QuantiFERON-TB Gold-In-Tube (QTF-GIT); grupo-2 (1.464 pacientes): T-SPOT.TB + QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QTF-Plus).Resultados: La concordancia entre QTF-GIT y T-SPOT.TB fue del 83,19% (κ = 0,532). Las proporciones de resultados positivos, negativos e indeterminados fueron, respectivamente: 14,33 vs. 17,06%; 82,41 vs. 74,46%; y 3,25 vs. 8,46%. La concordancia entre QTF-Plus y T-SPOT.TB fue del 87,56% (κ=0,609). Las proporciones de resultados positivos, negativos e indeterminados fueron, respectivamente: 15,02 vs. 15,36%; 82,92 vs. 79,37%; y 2,04 vs. 5,25%. Las discordancias entre T-SPOT.TB y QTF-Plus fueron del 12,43%, que implicaban que había 103 pacientes positivos y otros 79 pacientes negativos a expensas exclusivamente de uno de los dos IGRA.Conclusiones: Se evidenció una mayor concordancia entre QTF-Plus y T-SPOT.TB que entre QTF-GIT y T-SPOT.TB. Sin embargo, creemos que la proporción de resultados discordantes entre T-SPOT.TB y QTF-Plus es lo suficientemente relevante clínicamente como para justificar el empleo simultáneo de dos IGRA en este grupo específico de pacientes. (AU)

Latent tuberculosis testing through the ages: the search for a sleeping killer.

Tuberculosis has been present in the world's population for as long as there has been written language. It is a disease known to the ancient Egyptians, Greeks, Romans, and Hebrews, but its etiology eluded the world for thousands of years. Even after the germ theory was accepted and early scientists hypothesized a pathogen as the cause, the identity of the sleeping killer in society remained a mystery. That is until Robert Koch was able to grow and visualize Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Koch introduced his Old Tuberculin solution as a diagnostic therapy of tuberculosis (TB), with the intent to reduce the number of infected persons and stop its spread. Old Tuberculin's ability to treat TB proved minimal, but its diagnostic potential paved the way for more effective tests from von Pirquet, Calmette, Wolff-Eisner, and Mantoux. Florence Seibert set out to identify and purify the active principle in Koch's Old Tuberculin and ended up creating purified protein derivative (PPD) tuberculin which is still used as the standard for the tuberculin skin test (TST). Interferon-γ release assays (IGRAs) are a more modern diagnostic tool for detecting latent TB infection that offer some benefits (and some disadvantages) to TST. TSTs and IGRAs can determine if an individual has been infected with M. tuberculosis but are equally unable to predict progression to active tuberculosis, the diagnosis of which relies on assessment of clinical symptoms, radiographic imaging, and sample culture.

Effect of adjusted cut-offs of interferon-γ release assays on diagnosis of tuberculosis in patients with fever of unknown origin.

BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) is a leading cause of fever of unknown origin (FUO). In recent years, interferon-γ release assays (IGRAs) have been widely utilized and the cut-off values given by the manufacturers are set in countries where rates of TB are not as high. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted in a Chinese general hospital to evaluate the diagnostic performance of T-SPOT.TB (T-SPOT) and QuantiFERON-TB Gold (QFT) in detecting active TB (ATB) in a high TB endemic area. Test results were compared with the culture and clinically confirmed diagnosis. Further, we explored an alternative method of interpreting IGRAs by increasing the cut-off values. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of T-SPOT in detecting ATB were 85.3% (95% CI 81.6-94.0%) and 71.8% (95% CI 67.3-76.0%), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of QFT were 72.3% (95% CI 62.8-80.1%) and 77.0% (95% CI 72.7-80.8%), respectively. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used for evaluation of different cut-off values. When the cut-off values were adjusted as 125 spot-forming cells (SFCs)/ 2.5*105 cells for T-SPOT and 4.0 IU/ml for QFT, the specificity could be improved to > 90.0% (90.3% and 94.1%, respectively), and the sensitivity were 43.1% and 41.6%, respectively. The new adjusted cut-off values were validated in another independent validation cohort. CONCLUSION: The adjusted cut-off values of the two assays considerably improved the diagnostic value when applied to FUO patients in clinical settings.

Diagnosis of Tuberculous Infection in Immunosuppressed Patients and/or Candidates for Biologics Using a Combination of 2 IGRA Tests: T-SPOT.TB/QuantiFERON TB Gold In-Tube vs. T-SPOT.TB/QuantiFERON TB Gold Plus. / Diagnóstico de la infección tuberculosa en pacientes inmunodeprimidos y/o candidatos a terapias biológicas mediante el uso combinado de dos pruebas IGRA: T-SPOT.TB/QuantiFERON TB Gold In-Tube vs. T-SPOT.TB/QuantiFERON TB Gold Plus.

INTRODUCTION: The diagnosis of latent tuberculous infection (LTI) by IGRA continues to generate debate. Experience in the simultaneous use of 2 IGRA tests is scant. The aim of this study was to compare the results of 2 versions of QuantiFERON-TB Gold (In-Tube/Plus) with those of T-SPOT.TB, and to analyse the effectiveness of a dual strategy (T-SPOT.TB + QTF) for the diagnosis of LTI in an immunosuppressed population. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study (May 2015-June 2017) that included 2,999 immunosuppressed patients and/or candidates for biologics, in whom 2 simultaneous IGRA tests were performed: Group 1 (1535 patients): T-SPOT.TB + QuantiFERON-TB Gold-In-Tube (QTF-GIT); Group 2 (1464 patients): T-SPOT.TB + QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QTF-Plus). RESULTS: The concordance between QTF-GIT and T-SPOT.TB was 83.19% (κ=0.532). The percentage of positive, negative, and indeterminate results were, respectively: 14.33% vs. 17.06%; 82.41% vs. 74.46%; and 3.25% vs. 8.46%. The concordance between QTF-Plus and T-SPOT.TB was 87.56% (κ=0.609). The percentage of positive, negative, and indeterminate results were, respectively: 15.02% vs. 15.36%; 82.92% vs. 79.37%; and 2.04% vs. 5.25%. Discrepancies between T-SPOT.TB and QTF-Plus were 12.43%, suggesting that 103 patients were positive and another 79 were negative due exclusively to 1 of the 2 IGRAs. CONCLUSIONS: Greater concordance was found between QTF-Plus and T-SPOT.TB than between QTF-GIT and T-SPOT.TB. However, we believe that the proportion of discrepancies between T-SPOT.TB and QTF-Plus is sufficiently important from a clinical point of view to justify the simultaneous use of 2 IGRA in this specific patient group.

Insight into diagnosis of female genital tuberculosis.

INTRODUCTION: Female genital tuberculosis (TB) is a common form of extrapulmonary TB (EPTB) with varied clinical presentations, i.e. infertility, pelvic pain, and menstrual irregularities. Diagnosis of female genital TB is challenging predominantly due to paucibacillary nature of specimens and inconclusive results obtained by most of the routine laboratory tests. AREAS COVERED: This review has briefly summarized the epidemiology, clinical features, and transmission of female genital TB. Commonly used laboratory tests include bacteriological examination (smear/culture), tuberculin skin testing, interferon-γ release assays, imaging, laparoscopy/hysteroscopy, and histopathological/cytological observations. Furthermore, utility of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs), like loop-mediated isothermal amplification, PCR, multiplex-PCR, nested PCR, real-time PCR, and GeneXpert® could significantly improve the detection of female genital TB. EXPERT OPINION: Currently, there is no single test available for the efficient diagnosis of female genital TB, rather a combination of tests is being employed, which yields moderate diagnostic accuracy. The latest modalities developed for diagnosing pulmonary TB and other clinical EPTB forms, i.e. aptamer-linked immobilized sorbent assay, immuno-PCR (I-PCR), analysis of circulating cell-free DNA by NAATs, and identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis biomarkers within extracellular vesicles of bodily fluids by I-PCR/nanoparticle-based I-PCR, may also be exploited to further improve the diagnosis of female genital TB.

Predictors for False-Negative Interferon-Gamma Release Assay Results in Hemodialysis Patients with Latent Tuberculosis Infection.

The present study aimed to clinically evaluate the effect of T-cell dysfunction in hemodialysis (HD) patients with latent tuberculosis (TB) infection (LTBI) who were false-negatives in the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) test. Whole blood samples from a total of 20 active TB patients, 83 HD patients, and 52 healthy individuals were collected, and the QFT-GIT test was used for measuring Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB)-specific interferon gamma (IFN-γ) level. The positive rate of the IFN-γ release assays (IGRAs) in HD patients was lower than the negative rate. The mean value of MTB-specific IFN-γ level, which determines the positive rate of the IGRA test, was highest in active TB, followed by HD patients and healthy individuals. Among HD patients, phytohemagglutinin A (PHA)-stimulated IFN-γ levels of approximately 40% were 10.00 IU/mL or less. However, there was no low level of PHA-stimulated IFN-γ in the healthy individuals. This reveals that T-cell function in HD patients was reduced compared to healthy individuals, which leads to the possibility that QFT-GIT results in HD patients are false-negative. The clinical manifestations of TB in patients on HD are quite non-specific, making timely diagnosis difficult and delaying the initiation of curative treatment, delay being a major determinant of outcome.

Differential Diagnosis of Latent Tuberculosis Infection and Active Tuberculosis: A Key to a Successful Tuberculosis Control Strategy.

As an ancient infectious disease, tuberculosis (TB) is still the leading cause of death from a single infectious agent worldwide. Latent TB infection (LTBI) has been recognized as the largest source of new TB cases and is one of the biggest obstacles to achieving the aim of the End TB Strategy. The latest data indicate that a considerable percentage of the population with LTBI and the lack of differential diagnosis between LTBI and active TB (aTB) may be potential reasons for the high TB morbidity and mortality in countries with high TB burdens. The tuberculin skin test (TST) has been used to diagnose TB for > 100 years, but it fails to distinguish patients with LTBI from those with aTB and people who have received Bacillus Calmette-Guérin vaccination. To overcome the limitations of TST, several new skin tests and interferon-gamma release assays have been developed, such as the Diaskintest, C-Tb skin test, EC-Test, and T-cell spot of the TB assay, QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube, QuantiFERON-TB Gold-Plus, LIAISON QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus test, and LIOFeron TB/LTBI. However, these methods cannot distinguish LTBI from aTB. To investigate the reasons why all these methods cannot distinguish LTBI from aTB, we have explained the concept and definition of LTBI and expounded on the immunological mechanism of LTBI in this review. In addition, we have outlined the research status, future directions, and challenges of LTBI differential diagnosis, including novel biomarkers derived from Mycobacterium tuberculosis and hosts, new models and algorithms, omics technologies, and microbiota.

Performance of 4 methods for screening of latent tuberculosis infection in patients with chronic inflammatory arthritis under TNFα inhibitors: a 24-month prospective study.

BACKGROUND: The reactivation rate of tuberculosis in patients with chronic inflammatory arthritis (CIA) on TNFα inhibitors (TNFi) and baseline negative screening for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is higher than in the general population. AIM: To compare the performance of tuberculin skin test (TST), TST-Booster, ELISPOT (T-SPOT.TB) and QuantiFERON-TB Gold in tube (QFT-IT) to detect LTBI in patients with CIA on TNFi. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 102 patients with CIA [rheumatoid arthritis (RA), n = 40; ankylosing spondylitis (AS), n = 35; psoriatic arthritis (PsA), n = 7; and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), n = 20] were prospectively followed-up for 24 months to identify incident LTBI cases. Epidemiologic data, TST, T-SPOT.TB, QFT-IT and a chest X-ray were performed at baseline and after 6 months of LTBI treatment. RESULTS: Thirty six percent (37/102) of patients had positive TST or Interferon Gamma Release Assays (IGRAs) tests. Agreement among TST and IGRAs was moderate (k = 0.475; p = 0.001), but high between T-SPOT.TB and QFT-IT (k = 0.785; p < 0.001). During the 24-Month follow-up, 15 (18.5%) incident cases of LTBI were identified. In comparison to TST, the IGRAs increased the LTBI diagnosis power in 8.5% (95% CI 3.16-17.49). TST-Booster did not add any value in patients with negative TST at baseline. After 6-Month isoniazid therapy, IGRAs results did not change significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Almost 20% of CIA patients had some evidence of LTBI, suggesting higher conversion rate after exposition to TNFi. TST was effective in identifying new cases of LTBI, but IGRAs added diagnostic power in this scenario. Our findings did not support the repetition of IGRAs after 6-Month isoniazid therapy and this approach was effective to mitigate active TB in 2 years of follow-up.

Neoteric advancements in TB diagnostics and its future frame.

Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the major infectious disease that causes threat to human health and leads to death in most of the cases. Mycobacterium tuberculosis is the causative agent that can affect both pulmonary and extra pulmonary regions of the body. This infection can be presented either as an active or latent form in the patients. Although this disease has been declared curable and preventable by WHO, it still holds its position as a global emergency. Over the past decade many hurdles such as low immunity, co-infections like HIV, autoimmune disorders, poverty, malnutrition and emerging trends in drug resistance patterns are hindering the eradication of this infection. However, many programmes have been launched by WHO with involvement of governments at various level to put a full stop over the disease. Under the Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme (RNTCP) which was recently renamed as National Tuberculosis Elimination Programme (NTEP), the major focus is on eliminating tuberculosis by the year 2025. The main aim of the programme is to identify feasible quality testing, evaluate through NIKSHYA poshak yozana, restrict through BCG vaccination and assemble with public awareness to eradicate MTB. Numerous novel diagnostic techniques and molecular tools have been developed to elucidate and differentiate report of various suspected and active tuberculosis patients. However, improvements are still required to cut short the duration of the overall process ranging from screening of patients to their successful treatment.

Current updates in diagnosis of male urogenital tuberculosis.

Introduction: Urogenital tuberculosis (UGTB) is a common manifestation of extrapulmonary TB (EPTB), which affects both men and women in a ratio of 2:1. Similar to other EPTB types, diagnosis of UGTB is quite challenging owing to atypical clinical presentation and paucibacillary nature of specimens. This review is primarily focused on the current updates developed in the diagnosis of male UGTB.Area covered: Smear/culture, imaging, histopathology, and interferon-γ release assays are the main modalities employed for detecting male UGTB cases. Moreover, we described the utility of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs), including loop-mediated isothermal amplification, PCR, nested-PCR, and GeneXpert (MTB/RIF) assays. The possibility of using other novel modalities, such as immuno-PCR (I-PCR), aptamer-linked immobilized sorbent assay (ALISA), and identification of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) by NAATs were also discussed.Expert opinion: The current methods used for the diagnosis of male UGTB are not adequate. Therefore, the latest molecular/immunological tools, i.e. Xpert Ultra, Truenat MTBTM, I-PCR, ALISA, and cfDNA detection employed for the diagnosis of other EPTB forms and pulmonary TB may also be exploited for UGTB diagnosis. Reliable and timely diagnosis of male UGTB may initiate an early start of anti-tubercular therapy that would reduce infertility and other complications associated with disease.

Risk factors for negative T-SPOT.TB assay results in patients with confirmed active tuberculosis: A retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: The interferon-γ release assays as potent adjunct tools for the quick detection of TB in high burden countries is feasible. In this retrospective study, we aimed to identify the risk factors for negative T-SPOT results in confirmed active tuberculosis. METHODOLOGY: We consecutively enrolled 1,021 patients who were positive for acid-fast bacilli smear staining or culture-confirmed mycobacterial infection and simultaneously tested with the T-SPOT.TB assay. All of the included specimens were used to discriminate the Mycobacterium species using the biochip assay. We collected basic clinical characteristics and laboratory results for further analysis. RESULTS: Of the 1,021 patients enrolled in the study, 89 patients were identified as having nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM). Ninety-nine patients were excluded from the analysis because of indeterminate T-SPOT.TB results, while the remaining 833 patients were identified as having Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. In total, 159 patients had false-negative T-SPOT.TB results (19.1% of 833). The concordance rate between the T-SPOT.TB results and final diagnoses in females was always lower than that in males. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that female sex (OR 1.81; 95% CI 1.19, 2.7; p = 0.006), age (OR 1.02; 95% CI 1.01, 1.03; p = 0.003), acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear-negative (OR 5.45; 95% CI 3.62, 8.19; p < 0.001), HIV coinfection (OR 6.83; 95% CI 2.73, 17.10; p < 0.001) were associated with negative T-SPOT.TB result. CONCLUSIONS: Female is another independent risk factor of negative T-SPOT.TB results, besides to elder, HIV co-infection, acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear-negative who are suspected of having active TB infection.

Tuberculosis Skin Test Screening in the National Tuberculosis Program of Trinidad and Tobago.

Globally, a quarter of the population is infected with tuberculosis (TB), caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. About 5-10% of latent TB infections (LTBI) progress to active disease during the lifetime. Prevention of TB and treating LTBI is a critical component of the World Health Organization's (WHO) End TB Strategy. This study aims to examine the screening practices for prevention and treatment employed by the National Tuberculosis Program of Trinidad and Tobago in comparison to the WHO's standard guidelines. A cross-sectional retrospective study was conducted from the TB registers (2018-2019) for persons aged 18 years and above with recorded tuberculin skin test reactions (TST). Bivariate comparisons for categorical variables were made using Chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Binary logistic regression was used for exploring predictors of TST positivity with adjustment for demographic confounders in multivariable models. Of the total 1972 eligible entries studied, 384 (19.4%) individuals were tested positive with TST. TB contact screening (aOR 2.49; 95% CI 1.65, 3.75) and Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccination status (aOR 1.66; 95% CI, 1.24 to 2.22) were associated with a positive TST reaction, whereas, preplacement screening failed to show such association when compared to those screened as suspect cases. The findings suggest that TB contact screening and positive BCG vaccination status are associated with TST positivity independent of age and gender.

Screening and evaluation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis diagnostic antigens.

In recent years, the prevalence of tuberculosis worldwide has increased, and with it, the number of drug-resistant tuberculosis strains. This has brought new challenges towards prevention and control of the disease. Therefore, it is urgent to find reliable and rapid diagnostic methods for tuberculosis in general, and for the drug-resistant forms of the disease. To this aim, we assessed 17 tuberculosis-specific protein candidates for the detection of tuberculosis-specific antibodies. First, we established an indirect ELISA method to detect anti-Mycobacterium tuberculosis IgM and IgG. We tested 453 sera and analyzed the efficacy of the protein candidates for diagnosis of tuberculosis. Next, we screened antigens rich in T cell epitopes for their ability to induce high levels of IFN-γ, in order to define their suitability does develop detection tests based on IFN-γ release assay (IGRAs). The antigens CFP-10, PPE57, 38kDa, and Rv3807 showed higher diagnostic potential for the detection of anti-tuberculosis IgM, whereas PPE57, Ag85B, CFP-10, Rv0220, and 38kDa antigens performed better for anti-tuberculosis IgG detection. Worth noting is that CFP-10, 38kDa, and PPE57 detected efficiently both IgM and IgG. Rv1987, Rv3807, PPE57, Rv0220, and MPT64 proteins alone and combinations of Rv1987 + Rv3807, 16kDa + Rv0220, and MPT64 + Rv1986 tested in IGRAs displayed a good correlation with the positive control constituted by a cocktail of ESAT-6 + CFP-10 + TB7.7 (ECT), known for their stimulating properties (r > 0.5, p < 0.01). Among these antigen candidates, Rv0220 and Rv1987 + Rv3807 were the most potent. We discovered CFP-10, 38kDa, and PPE57 for the detection of anti-M. tuberculosis IgM and IgG, and Rv0220 alone or the combination Rv1987 + Rv3807 as the strongest stimulators in IGRAs. These antigens provide new references for the screening of tuberculosis-specific antibodies and effective stimulation in IGRAs.