Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Vaccines , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , Humans , Immunization, Secondary , Incidence , Vaccination , Vaccine EfficacyABSTRACT
Introducción: En el Perú, el programa actual de inmunización para COVID-19 comprende las vacunas BBIBP-CorV, BNT162B2 y ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. Si bien el esquema de inmunización es de dos dosis, algunos países han incluido recientemente una dosis de refuerzo a su esquema. Métodos: Se realizó una búsqueda de evidencia científica sobre la eficacia y seguridad de la vacunación de refuerzo con la vacuna BNT162b2 en población con esquema de vacunación completa para COVID-19 en Perú. Evidencia incluida: Se consideraron cuatro documentos de recomendación basados en evidencia, un estudio observacional y tres ensayos clínicos fase III en curso. Conclusión: A la fecha, no existe evidencia suficiente sobre la eficacia de agregar una dosis de refuerzo al esquema de inmunización para COVID-19. La evidencia disponible no permite justificar el uso de una dosis de refuerzo con la vacuna BNT162B2 en población que recibió previamente dos dosis de las vacunas anteriormente mencionadas.
Introduction: In Peru, the current immunization schedule for COVID-19 comprises BBIBP-CorV, BNT162B2 and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccines. Although the immunization schedule is two doses, some countries have recently included a booster dose to their schedule. Methods: A search for scientific evidence on the efficacy and safety of booster vaccination with BNT162b2 vaccine in a population with a complete vaccination schedule for COVID-19 in Peru was performed. Evidence included: Four evidence-based recommendation documents, one observational study and three ongoing phase III clinical trials were considered. Conclusion: To date, there is insufficient evidence on the efficacy of adding a booster dose to the immunization schedule for COVID-19. The available evidence does not justify the use of a booster dose of BNT162B2 vaccine in a population that previously received two doses of the aforementioned vaccines.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess the prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) seroprotection among vaccinated children in the Assiut governorate, Egypt, and assess a booster dose immune memory response among non-seroprotected children. METHODS: Using a multistage cluster sample, 566 children were recruited from three clusters: one urban and two rural. Children were aged from nine months to 16 years old. All participants received the full three doses of the compulsory HBV vaccine during infancy. Serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), total anti-hepatitis B core (anti-HBc) antibodies, and quantitative detection of anti-HBs were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Repeatedly positive samples for HBsAg/anti-HBc were submitted for quantitative HBV DNA detection using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Non-seroprotective participants (anti-HBs < 10 IU/L) were given a booster dose of HBV vaccine. Two weeks later, a blood sample was taken from each child to assess an anamnestic response. RESULTS: The seroprotection rate was 53.2%, and only two children had HBV breakthrough infection (0.4%) with positive serum anti-HBc and HBV DNA. Age was the only significant predictor for non-seroprotection with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 3.2, 9.4, and 9.9 among children aged 5-10, 11-15, and > 15 years, respectively, compared to younger children (p < 0.001). About 85% of non-seroprotected children developed an anamnestic response after receiving the booster dose, and 84.3% of responders had a good response (3 100 IU/L). Undetectable pre-booster titer was found to be the only risk factor for non-response to booster with OR = 3.2 (p < 0.010). About 95.7% of children who were not responding to booster dose developed immune response after receiving the three doses of HBV vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: Older age of children was the only significant predictor for HBV non-seroprotection. High anamnestic response rate signifies the presence of immune memory with long-term protection despite the waning of anti-HBs over time. However, some children with pre-booster undetectable anti-HBs titers may be unable to develop anamnestic response, and a second vaccination series might be necessary for HBV protection for these children.
ABSTRACT
Vaccines are one of the most effective weapons of humankind in the fight against various infectious diseases. Therefore, physicians from all specialties should not only regularly confirm their knowledge regarding vaccinations but also actively offer them in their daily routine. Urologists can use various vaccination offers to help protect their patients' future health. In addition to human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccinations for children and adolescents, this article shows how urologists who provide vaccines can fulfill their responsibility to implement the state vaccination recommendations to patients over the age of 60. Among others, HPV vaccination can have the effect of finally eradicating an evolutionary burden of humanity. In addition to standard vaccinations against tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis, special vaccinations also protect individuals over the age of 60 against pneumococci, influenza and herpes zoster. Moreover, urologists may in the future also save patients from COVID-19-the disease that actually made people aware of vaccinations again.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Papillomavirus Vaccines , Adolescent , Child , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Urologists , VaccinationABSTRACT
Abstract: Objective: To asses the non-inferiority between two different vaccination schedules one month after the administration of the third dose. Materials and methods: We evaluated the anti-HPV 16/18 antibody titers induced by quadrivalent HPV vaccine administered using two different schedules in girls 9 to 10-year-old girls: a traditional (0-2-6) and an alternative (0-6-50). Blood samples were collected at month 7, 21 and 51. Results: The antibody geometric mean titer ratios one month after the application of the third dose -month 51 for the alternative and month 7 for the traditional- were 1.55 for HPV16 (95%CI, 1.15-2.08) and 1.53 for HPV18 (95%CI, 1.12-2.09). The seropositive rate was above 99% in both groups. Conclusions: The application of an alternative 3-dose schedule in 9 to 10-year-old girls induces a non-inferior immune response compared to the standard one month after the last dose. Further research is needed to understand the minimal number of doses and their timing to provide the best coverage for HPV infection.
Resumen: Objetivo: Evaluar la no inferioridad entre dos diferentes esquemas de vacunación un mes después de la administración de la tercera dosis. Material y métodos: Se evaluaron los títulos de anticuerpos anti-VPH 16/18 inducidos por la vacuna contra VPH tetravalente administrada en niñas de 9 a 10 años utilizando dos esquemas diferentes: tradicional (0-2-6) y alternativo (0-6-50). Se recolectaron muestras en los meses 7, 21 y 51. Resultados: La media geométrica de títulos de anticuerpos un mes después de la aplicación de la tercera dosis -mes 51 para la alternativa y mes 7 para el tradicional- fueron 1.55 para HPV16 (95% IC 1.15-2.08) y 1.53 para HPV18 (95% IC 1.12-2.09). La tasa de seropositividad fue superior a 99% en ambos grupos. Conclusiones: la aplicación de un esquema alternativo de tres dosis (0-6-50 meses) en niñas parece inducir una respuesta inmune no inferior al esquema tradicional un mes después de la última dosis. Se necesitan más estudios para determinar las dosis mínimas e intervalos óptimos para obtener la mejor cobertura para la infección por VPH.
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Child , Immunization Schedule , Immunization, Secondary/methods , Human Papillomavirus Recombinant Vaccine Quadrivalent, Types 6, 11, 16, 18/administration & dosage , Immunogenicity, Vaccine/immunology , Time Factors , Human papillomavirus 16/immunology , Human papillomavirus 18/immunology , Human Papillomavirus Recombinant Vaccine Quadrivalent, Types 6, 11, 16, 18/immunology , Mexico , Antibodies, Viral/biosynthesis , Antibodies, Viral/bloodABSTRACT
In 2001, the measles immunization schedule in Saudi Arabia was changed to 2 measles, mumps and rubella vaccine doses at 12 months and at 6 years. In this follow-up study we evaluated the seroresponse to the second measles dose before school entry. We recruited 138 children randomly from primary health care centres in Qassinn; 124 children completed the study. Blood samples were collected before and 1 month after giving the second measles dose, before the age of 6 years. There was a statistically significant increase in the geometric mean titre of measles antibody, from 2205 m lU/mL before vaccination to 4723 mlU/mL after [P = 0.0001]. The proportion of children with positive ELISA results increased fro++ 94.2% before vaccination to 99.2% after [P = 0.02], while the proportion with protective level [
Subject(s)
Immunization, Secondary , Immunization Schedule , Schools , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Measles VaccineABSTRACT
The current target groups for measles, mumps and rubella vaccination in the Islamic Republic of Iran are children at 12 months and 4-6 years. A study of the age-specific seroprevalence of antibodies against mumps in children aged 3-18 years in Shahrekord aimed to establish the need for booster vaccinations to cover non-immune children. Of 338 children, 19.8% were seronegative. Age-specific seronegativity was 33.3%, 20.5% and 4.6% in age groups 7-11, 12-14 and 15-18 years respectively. To obtain herd immunity, we suggest that for the next 5 years children aged 7-11 years entering guidance school are selected as the main group for vaccination
Subject(s)
Mumps Vaccine , Mumps , Immunization, Secondary , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Immunoglobulin G , Age Factors , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayABSTRACT
This study evaluated the effectiveness and usefulness of vaccination against diphtheria and tetanus in different age groups in Gaza, Palestine. Blood samples were collected from 180 children aged < 12 years, 90 males and 90 females. Using ELISA methods, the efficacy of vaccination was estimated at 87.8% for diphtheria and 98.3% for tetanus. Mean serum titres varied significantly by age group: for diphtheria 0.24 IU/mL at age 2-4 years, 0.63 IU/mL at 7-8 years and 0.46 IU/mL at 11-12 years, and for tetanus 1.01 IU/mL, 2.63 IU/mL and 1.20 IU/mL respectively. The relatively low antibody titres, especially for diphtheria, suggest the need for a booster dose
Subject(s)
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Antibodies , Immunization, Secondary , Diphtheria-Tetanus VaccineABSTRACT
Objective To understand the influence of HBsAg+ pregnant woman on the persistence of hepatitis B surface antibody(HBsAb)of neonates in three years after the first"0,1,6"immunization,and the influences of regular examination every half-year and revaceination in time on maintaining the immune effect. Methods Twenty neonates born from HBsAg-mothers and 24 from HBsAg+ mothers were followed up for 3 years.And children whose HBsAb's titer faded or disappeared(unstable)received recombinate yeast-derived hepatitis B gene vaccine.The proportion of children with unstable HBsAb and the positive rate of HBsAb on 7 month-old and 3 year-old were compared. Results The unstable rate of HBsAb in HBsAg- and HBsAg+ groups were 20.0%(4/20)and 79.2%(19/24),respectively(P<0.05).The rate of revaccination in these two groups were significantly different.The positive rate of HBsAb in 7 month-old children of HBsAg-mothers was 100.0%(20/20)and 62.5%(15/24)in those of the HBsAg+ group(P<0.05).No statistically difference was detected between the two groups when followed up at 3 years of age[85.0%(17/20)vs 91.7%(22/24),P>0.05]. Conclusions HBsAg+ mothers would reduce the stability of HBsAb in their neonates within three years after the first"0,1,6"immunization,but the immune effect of vaccination against hepatitis B can be maintained through regular examination every half or one year and revaccination.
ABSTRACT
Objective To study effect of nasal tolerance with rat-derived 97-116 peptide of AChR α-subunit(Rα97-116(V108A))on the manifestation of muscle weakness and the immunity function of experimental autoimmune myasthenia gravis(EAMG).Methods Twenty-two EAMG model Lewis rats immunized thrice with Rα97-116(V108A)were divided randomly into tolerance group and control group.They were respectively immunized with Rα97-116(V108A)and PBS buffer solution for 10 days via nasal mucous.Then the body weight and Lennon score of two group Lewis rats were measured.Their serum anti-AChR antibodies were tested by ELISA,the expression levels of CD28,CTLA4,B7-1 and B7-2 were determined by flow cytometry.Results Compared with control group at different time points.the body weight of tolerance group rats(tolerance group(228.1±5.8)g,control group(215.0±16.2)g,t=2.395,P＜0.05)increased,the mean clinical score of rats(tolerance group 1.55±0.44.control group 2.10±0.66,t=-2.20,P＜0.05)decreased and the amount of serum anti-AChR antibody(tolerance group 0.97±0.20,control group 1.27±0.26,t=-2.857,P＜0.05)decreased obviously.the amount of CD28,B7-1,B7-2,CTLA4(%)expressed on the surface of peripheral blood cells(tolerance group:27.35±7.05,4.73±0.58,2.71±0.35,1.72±0.44,control group:40.02±8.81,9.52±1.25,5.88±1.09,2.64±0.47)down-regulated markedly(t=3.479,10.861,8.755,4.403,all P＜0.01).Conclusion Nasal mucous tolerance with Rα97-116(V108A)could ameliorate muscular weakness of EAMG rats while activates T cell and inhibits B cellular immunity.
ABSTRACT
An outbreak of measles due to secondary vaccine failure prompted this investigation into the prevalence of measles antibody in children. We studied 608 children in 7 different age groups: 6, 9, 14 and 18 months and 6, 10 and 15 years. Children in the 2 youngest groups received no vaccination; the rest were vaccinated at 9 months and 15 months. The 15-year-old age group received an additional vaccination. Transplacental measles antibody [Ab] decreased from 10.0% at 6 months to 0% at 9 months. Measles Ab was positive in 52.9% [14 months], 89.4% [18 months], 60.8% 96 years], 45.0% [10 years] and 96.8% [15 years].To increase Ab levels, a booster vaccination is recommended, administered either with the second DPT booster or at pre-high school age
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral , Age Distribution , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Immunization, Secondary , Immunoglobulin G , Measles , Seroepidemiologic Studies , VaccinationABSTRACT
In 1992, Egypt adopted a hepatitis B vaccine schedule at 2, 4 and 6 months of age. We evaluated the long-term immunogenicity and efficacy of vaccination using this schedule in 180 children whose time lapse since last vaccination varied between 1 month and 5 years. None of the participants had clinical hepatitis, HBsAg was not detected in any participant and all but one had negative results for anti-HBc test. Although a high seroprotection rate [93.3%] was elicited 1 month after vaccination, there were low initial anti-HBs concentrations and both declined rapidly over time. Thus, the short interval [2 months] between the second and third doses of vaccine is less desirable in the long term. We recommend booster inoculations for all previously vaccinated children and a new vaccination schedule at 1, 2 and 9 months
