ABSTRACT
RESUMEN: Introducción: Actualmente no hay consenso sobre el manejo anestésico más adecuado en el implante valvular aórtico percutáneo por vía transfemoral. Aunque se ha demostrado la factibilidad de concretar el procedimiento bajo anestesia local con sedación consciente o sin esta, los resultados clínicos reportados son controvertidos. Objetivos: Evaluar la seguridad y eficacia del implante valvular aórtico percutáneo por vía transfemoral realizado bajo anestesia general versus anestesia local con sedación consciente. Material y métodos: Análisis unicéntrico y retrospectivo de los pacientes con estenosis aórtica grave sintomática con alto riesgo quirúrgico sometidos a un implante valvular aórtico percutáneo por vía transfemoral desde marzo de 2009 a diciembre de 2016, según el manejo anestésico. Los desenlaces de seguridad y eficacia fueron evaluados a 30 días según las definiciones del Valve Academic Research Consortium-2. Además, se evaluaron los principales tiempos durante la internación. Resultados: Se incluyeron 121 pacientes (Edad 83,2 ± 5,7 años, hombres 48,8%), tratados con un implante valvular aórtico percutáneo por vía transfemoral bajo anestesia general (n = 55, 45,5%) o anestesia local con sedación consciente (n = 66, 54,5%). No se observaron diferencias significativas en los resultados intraprocedimiento ni en los desenlaces de seguridad y eficacia a 30 días. La mortalidad a 30 días fue del 7,3% en el grupo AG y del 3% en el grupo anestesia local con sedación consciente 3%, p log-rank 0,28 (mortalidad global 5%). La necesidad de conversión a anestesia general se presentó en 2 pacientes (3%), por complicaciones vasculares mayores durante el procedimiento. El grupo anestesia local con sedación consciente presentó menor tiempo total de procedimiento, internación en unidad de cuidados intensivos e internación total. Conclusión: El implante valvular aórtico percutáneo por vía transfemoral realizado bajo anestesia local con sedación consciente, parece ser una alternativa segura y eficaz al uso de anestesia general.
Abstract: Background: Currently, there is no consensus about the most adequate anesthetic management in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Although it has been shown that local anesthesia (LA) with or without conscious sedation is feasible, clinical results are controversial. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement performed under general anesthesia versus local anesthesia with conscious sedation. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective study of high risk patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement between March 2009 and December 2016. The population was divided according to anesthetic management. Safety and efficacy outcomes were evaluated at 30-days and were classified according to definitions of the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2. In addition, key times during hospitalization were evaluated. Results: A total of 121 patients undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement under general anesthesia (n=55, 45.5%) or local anesthesia with conscious sedation (n=66, 54.5%). were included in this analysis. Mean age was 83.2±5.7 years and 48.8% were men. There were no differences in either the procedural result or in the 30-day efficacy and safety outcomes. The rate of death at 30-days was 7.3% in the group with general anesthesia and 3% in the local anesthesia with conscious sedation group (log-rank p 0.28). The need of conversion to general anesthesia was 3% (2 patients), in all cases due to major vascular complications during the procedure. In the local anesthesia with conscious sedation group shorter procedural time, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay were observed. Conclusions: Transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement performed under local anesthesia with conscious sedation seems to be a safe and effective alternative to the use of general anesthesia.
ABSTRACT
La estenosis aórtica es la causa más común de enfermedad valvular en EE. UU. y Europa. En la actualidad el reemplazo valvular quirúrgico es el tratamiento de elección para los pacientes con estenosis aórtica grave, sin embargo, el implante valvular aórtico percutáneo permite el tratamiento de la estenosis aórtica de una manera menos invasiva en pacientes de riesgo elevado o no candidatos a cirugía. Dado que en el implante percutáneo no hay una visualización directa del campo quirúrgico, es necesario evaluar con precisión la anatomía vascular de manera preoperatoria. Por lo tanto, para mejorar los resultados y evitar las complicaciones, la tomografía multidetector se considera parte del estudio rutinario de estos pacientes, ya que la información que se obtiene de la aorta y arterias iliacas permite al médico una planeación precisa antes de la intervención. En esta revisión describimos los aspectos básicos del procedimiento y la importancia clínica de la tomografía multidetector.
Aortic stenosis is the most common valvular disorder in the United States and Europe. Nowadays, surgical aortic valve replacement remains the standard treatment for patients with severe aortic stenosis; however, transcatheter aortic valve implantation represents a less invasive treatment option for aortic stenosis patients considered as high-risk or not suitable for surgical management. Because of the lack of direct visualization of the operative field in transcatheter aortic valve implantation, there is an increased need for precise pre-operative assessment of vascular anatomy. Therefore, in order to improve outcome and avoid complications, multidetector tomography is part of the routine evaluation of patients considered for this treatment. The data obtained covering the aorta and iliac arteries, allows the physician a precise planning prior to the intervention. In this review, we described basic aspects of the procedure, and the clinical relevance of the multidetector tomography.
Subject(s)
Humans , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Multidetector Computed Tomography , Multimodal Imaging , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/methodsABSTRACT
Aortic stenosis is the most common valvular disorder in the United States and Europe. Nowadays, surgical aortic valve replacement remains the standard treatment for patients with severe aortic stenosis; however, transcatheter aortic valve implantation represents a less invasive treatment option for aortic stenosis patients considered as high-risk or not suitable for surgical management. Because of the lack of direct visualization of the operative field in transcatheter aortic valve implantation, there is an increased need for precise pre-operative assessment of vascular anatomy. Therefore, in order to improve outcome and avoid complications, multidetector tomography is part of the routine evaluation of patients considered for this treatment. The data obtained covering the aorta and iliac arteries, allows the physician a precise planning prior to the intervention. In this review, we described basic aspects of the procedure, and the clinical relevance of the multidetector tomography.
