ABSTRACT
Many lesions in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) exhibit significant calcification. Several techniques have been developed to improve outcomes in this setting. However, their impact on coronary microcirculation remains unknown. The aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of plaque modification techniques on coronary microcirculation across patients with severely calcified coronary artery disease. In this multicenter retrospective study, consecutive patients undergoing PCI with either Rotablation (RA) or Shockwave-intravascular-lithotripsy (IVL) were included. Primary endpoint was the impairment of coronary microvascular resistances assessed by Δ angiography-derived index of microvascular resistance (ΔIMRangio) which was defined as the difference in IMRangio value post- and pre-PCI. Secondary endpoints included the development of peri procedural PCI complications (flow-limiting coronary dissection, slow-flow/no reflow during PCI, coronary perforation, branch occlusion, failed PCI, stroke and shock developed during PCI) and 12-month follow-up adverse events. 162 patients were included in the analysis. Almost 80% of patients were male and the left descending anterior artery was the most common treated vessel. Both RA and IVL led to an increase in ΔIMRangio (22.3 and 10.3; p = 0.038, respectively). A significantly higher rate of PCI complications was observed in patients with ΔIMRangio above the median of the cohort (21.0% vs. 6.2%; p = 0.006). PCI with RA was independently associated with higher ΔIMRangio values (OR 2.01, 95% CI: 1.01-4.03; p = 0.048). Plaque modification with IVL and RA during PCI increases microvascular resistance. Evaluating the microcirculatory status in this setting might help to predict clinical and procedural outcomes and to optimize clinical results.
ABSTRACT
Background: Angio-based index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) have been developed, however, the differences between baseline and hyperemic data and their effects on their computation have not yet been discussed. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of a novel method for calculating IMR and FFR from coronary angiography under baseline and hyperemic conditions. Methods: We performed a retrospective study to investigate the diagnostic performance of angiography-derived IMR (AccuIMR) and FFR (AccuFFRangio) computed from the hyperemic condition (AccuIMRhyp, AccuFFRangiohyp) and baseline condition (AccuIMRbase, AccuFFRangiobase) in 101 consecutive patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) who underwent measurements of IMR and FFR at a single center, using wire-based IMR and FFR as the reference standard. Results: AccuIMRhyp showed much better correlation with IMR than AccuIMRbase (r=0.77 vs. 0.47, P<0.001). The diagnostic accuracy and area under the curve (AUC) for identifying significant microvascular dysfunction was higher for AccuIMRhyp than AccuIMRbase [92.1% (95% CI: 85.0-96.5%) vs. 83.2% (95% CI: 74.4-89.9%), P=0.012; 0.942 (95% CI: 0.877-0.979) vs. 0.815 (95% CI: 0.726-0.886), P=0.003]. The computed AccuFFRangio showed good correlations with FFR and good diagnostic performance under both hyperemic and baseline conditions [r=0.68 vs. 0.68, P>0.99; diagnostic accuracy =95.9% (95% CI: 89.8-98.9%) vs. 94.9% (95% CI: 88.4-98.3%), P=0.728; AUC =0.989 (95% CI: 0.942-1.000) vs. 0.973 (95% CI: 0.919-0.995), P=0.381]. The net reclassification index (NRI) demonstrated that hyperemic group had improved reclassification ability compared to the baseline group in identification of IMR >25 (NRI =0.20, P<0.001) and FFR ≤0.8 (NRI =0.11, P<0.001). Conclusions: By comparing the calculated angio-derived IMR and FFR under the baseline and hyperemic conditions, this study demonstrates that AccuIMR calculation is more accurate using the hyperemic condition, while AccuFFRangio calculation is accurate under both conditions.
ABSTRACT
Background: Myocardial ischemia is caused by epicardial coronary artery stenosis or atherosclerotic disease affecting microcirculation. Trimetazidine (TMZ), promotes glucose oxidation which optimizes cellular energy processes in ischemic conditions. Small studies demonstrated protective effects of TMZ in terms of reducing myocardial injury after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), its effect on microcirculation using contemporary investigative methods has not been studied. The aim of the study was to examine effects of trimetazidine, given before elective PCI, on microcirculation using invasively measured index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR). Methods: This was prospective, single blinded, randomized study performed in a single university hospital. It included consecutive patients with an indication for PCI of a single, de novo, native coronary artery lesion. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either TMZ plus standard therapy (TMZ group) or just standard therapy. Coronary physiology indices fractional flow reserve (FFR), coronary flow reserve (CFR) and index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) were measured before and after PCI using coronary pressure wire. Results: We randomized 71 patients with similar clinical characteristics and risk profile, previous medications and coronary angiograms. Patientshad similar values of Pd/Pa, FFR and CFR prior to PCI procedure. After PCI, FFR values were higher in TMZ group, while IMR values were lower in this group respectively (FFR TMZ + 0.89 ± 0.05 vs. TMZ - 0.85 ± 0.06, p = 0.007; CFR TMZ + 2.1 ± 0.8 vs. TMZ- 2.3 ± 1.3, p = 0.469; IMR TMZ + 18 ± 9 vs. TMZ- 24 ± 12, p = 0.028). In two-way repeated measures ANOVA PCI was associated with change in FFR values (TMZ p = 0.050; PCI p < 0.001; p for interaction 0.577) and TMZ with change in IMR values (TMZ p = 0.034, PCI p = 0.129, p for interaction 0.344). Conclusion: Adding trimetazidine on top of medical treatment prior to elective PCI reduces microvascular dysfunction by lowering postprocedural IMR values when compared to standard therapy alone.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Invasively measured fractional flow reserve (FFR) and index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) are gold standards for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) and coronary microcirculatory dysfunction (CMD). However, the interaction between CAD and CMD has not been comprehensively investigated. We aim to non-invasively investigate hemodynamic effect of CMD in nonobstructive CAD cases using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation. METHOD: This study employed CFD simulations on six cases with nonobstructive CAD and CMD in left anterior descending artery (LAD) territories. Two microcirculatory situations were simulated: normal microcirculatory resistance (MR) situation; CMD situation where MR at the outlets of LAD branches were multiplied by the ratio of clinically measured IMR to the cutoff value. Blood flow, translesional pressure drop (Δptl), and simulated FFR (FFRCT) of LAD and non-culprit branches were compared between the two microcirculatory situations using Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: The results are in accordance with existing studies and clinical measurements. Compared with normal MR, there were significant decreases in outlet flow velocity and increases in FFRCT (p < 0.01 for both in Wilcoxon signed rank tests) in LAD branches with CMD, with minor decreases (0.63-5.64 mmHg) in Δptl. There was no significant influence on outlet flow velocity (< 2%) and FFRCT (< 0.02) in non-culprit branches (p > 0.05 for both). CONCLUSION: IMR-based CFD simulation could estimate hemodynamic effects of CMD. CMD in a coronary artery branch can decrease its blood flow and Δptl, increase its FFR, with little effect on non-culprit branches.
Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Coronary Stenosis , Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial , Coronary Angiography/methods , Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging , Hemodynamics , Humans , Hydrodynamics , Microcirculation/physiology , Pilot Projects , Predictive Value of TestsABSTRACT
The dysfunction of coronary microcirculation is an important cause of coronary artery disease (CAD). The index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) is a quantitative evaluation of coronary microcirculatory function, which provides a significant reference for the prediction, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of CAD. IMR also plays a key role in investigating the interaction between epicardial and microcirculatory dysfunctions, and is closely associated with coronary hemodynamic parameters such as flow rate, distal coronary pressure, and aortic pressure, which have been widely applied in computational studies of CAD. However, there is currently a lack of consensus across studies on the normal and pathological ranges of IMR. The relationships between IMR and coronary hemodynamic parameters have not been accurately quantified, which limits the application of IMR in computational CAD studies. In this paper, we discuss the research gaps between IMR and its potential applications in the computational simulation of CAD. Computational simulation based on the combination of IMR and other hemodynamic parameters is a promising technology to improve the diagnosis and guide clinical trials of CAD.
Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Circulation , Humans , Microcirculation , Predictive Value of Tests , Vascular ResistanceABSTRACT
Cardiovascular disease is one of the most serious diseases endangering human life and health. In China, 2 out of every 5 people die of cardiovascular diseases. Myocardial ischemia is one of the important cardiovascular diseases. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is used to quantify myocardial ischemia in epicardial stenoses. Index of microvascular resistance (IMR) is an invasive index for quantitative evaluation of coronary microcirculation. Traditional FFR and IMR measurements rely on guide wires to perform interventional measurements under the maximum hyperemia state,so as to assist the diagnosis of myocardial ischemia clinically. Coronary angiography-derived FFR and IMR without using invasive pressure-wire measurement, hyperemic stimulus and contraindications can assist the diagnosis and treatment of percutaneous coronary intervention by fast simultaneous calculation of FFR and IMR. In this review, the research progress of coronary angiography-derived FFR and IMR as well as other coronary physiological evaluation in recent years were summarized. It is of great clinical value to further study the combination of coronary angiography-derived FFR and IMR in functional research of coronary circulation from macro to micro.
ABSTRACT
The dysfunction of coronary microcirculation is an important cause of coronary artery disease (CAD). The index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) is a quantitative evaluation of coronary microcirculatory function, which provides a significant reference for the prediction, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of CAD. IMR also plays a key role in investigating the interaction between epicardial and microcirculatory dysfunctions, and is closely associated with coronary hemodynamic parameters such as flow rate, distal coronary pressure, and aortic pressure, which have been widely applied in computational studies of CAD. However, there is currently a lack of consensus across studies on the normal and pathological ranges of IMR. The relationships between IMR and coronary hemodynamic parameters have not been accurately quantified, which limits the application of IMR in computational CAD studies. In this paper, we discuss the research gaps between IMR and its potential applications in the computational simulation of CAD. Computational simulation based on the combination of IMR and other hemodynamic parameters is a promising technology to improve the diagnosis and guide clinical trials of CAD.