Factors affecting asthma control in pregnancy: A cross-sectional study.

Background and Objective: Asthma control in pregnant women remains of utmost importance; suboptimal control can have adverse repercussions on both fetal and maternal health. The objective was to identify the factors that affect asthma control in pregnant Pakistani women presenting to a tertiary care hospital. Methods: This descriptive, cross-sectional research was conducted at KRL General Hospital between 1st November 2022 to 30th April 2023. Non-probability technique was used to sample one hundred and forty-five pregnant women with confirmed bronchial asthma irrespective of their trimester presented. Data regarding demographics and factors affecting asthma control was collected. Results: The mean age was 30.39 ± 4.33 years, with two-thirds (65%) being multiparous. Approximately 48% of participants were non-compliant with treatment, and less than 40% achieved adequate asthma control. A chi-squared test applied showed that multiparity (p = 0.003), treatment compliance (p < 0.001), BMI (p < 0.001), and proper inhaler technique (p < 0.001) were statistically significant factors affecting asthma control in pregnant women while, the level of education and household income did not exhibit a significant association. Multiple regression analysis qualified higher BMI, multiparity, treatment compliance, and inhaler technique as significant predictors of asthma control amongst pregnant women. Conclusion: Ensuring asthma control during pregnancy is important. This study identified BMI, multiparity, inhaler technique, and treatment compliance as factors that affect asthma control in pregnant women. Addressing these factors through regular antenatal check-ups can significantly mitigate risks and promote the optimal health of both maternal and fetal lives.

Patient experiences of their current asthma care and their views toward providing support for patients with asthma in community pharmacy: A Qualitative study.

Background: An estimated 300 million people live with asthma globally. In England, a significant percentage live with poorly controlled asthma symptoms. Community pharmacists might be able to play a role in filling gaps in asthma care as they have the expertise and are in regular contact with patients with long term conditions. This study described patients' experiences of the management of their asthma in the general physician (GP) practice and community pharmacy settings and explored patients' views on providing support for them in community pharmacy. Method: This is a descriptive qualitative study. Thirteen adult asthma patients were recruited from a GP practice in the Northwest of England. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted face-to-face or by telephone. The interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using a thematic analysis approach. Ethics approval was obtained before the study commenced and all participants gave informed written consent to participate. Results: We identified challenges in the current asthma care provided to patients with asthma including lack of continuity of care, inability to book an appointment and other experienced differences in the quality of asthma care provided to them and/or access to annual asthma reviews across different GP practices. Additionally, there is lack of awareness of services provided in community pharmacy. These challenges along with having comorbidities alongside asthma may negatively affect asthma patients' engagement with their asthma appointments and their behaviour toward their asthma. Conclusions: Patients showed trust in community pharmacists same as other HCPs to support them with their asthma care. Patients thought that being provided with regular asthma care including reviews in community pharmacy might be a suitable approach to respond to patients' needs and preferences in terms of their asthma management because of ease of access to community pharmacy. Pharmacists could be involved in the provision of community pharmacy-based asthma interventions that involve more than inhaler technique education. Further research should focus on developing structured approaches for asthma patient education that can be implemented consistently in the context of community pharmacy in England.

Metered-Dose Inhaler Spacer with Integrated Spirometer for Home-Based Asthma Monitoring and Drug Uptake.

This work introduces Spiromni, a single device incorporating three different pressurised metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) accessories: a pMDI spacer, an electronic monitoring device (EMD), and a spirometer. While there are devices made to individually address the issues of technique, adherence and monitoring, respectively, for asthma patients as laid out in the Global Initiative for Asthma's (GINA) global strategy for asthma management and prevention, Spiromni was designed to address all three issues using a single, combination device. Spiromni addresses the key challenge of measuring both inhalation and exhalation profiles, which are different by an order of magnitude. Moreover, the innovative design prevents exhalation from entering the spacer chamber and prevents medication loss during inhalation using umbrella valves without a loss in flow velocity. Apart from recording the peak exhalation flow rate, data from the sensors allow us to extract other key lung volume and capacities measures similar to a medical pulmonary function test. We believe this low-cost portable multi-functional device will benefit both asthma patients and clinicians in the management of the disease.

A comprehensive evaluation of online inhaler use techniques for obstructive airway disease.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary inhaler therapy is a core treatment modality for >600 million individuals affected by obstructive airways disease globally. Poor inhaler technique is associated with reduced disease control and increased health care utilization; however, many patients rely on the internet as a technical resource. This study assesses the content and quality of online resources describing inhaler techniques. METHODS: A Google search was conducted in April 2023 capturing the top 5 search results for 12 common inhaler devices. Websites were compared to product monographs for preparation/first use, inhalational technique, and post-usage/device care. They were also assessed using accepted quality metrics (GQS, DISCERN, JAMA Benchmark scores) and clinically relevant aspects based on the literature and consensus statements. RESULTS: Websites regularly excluded critical steps important for proper inhaler technique. They performed best on information related directly to inhalation technique (average median score 78%), whereas steps related to preparation/first use (58%) or post-usage/device care (50%) were less frequently addressed. Median GQS, DISCERN, and JAMA Benchmark scores were 3 [IQR 3-4], 3 [IQR 2-4], and 1 [IQR 1-3], respectively. Clinically relevant factors were only addressed in about one-fifth of websites with no websites addressing smoking cessation, environmental considerations, or risk factors for poor technique. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights gaps in online resources describing inhaler technique, particularly related to preparation/first use and post-usage/device care steps. Clinically relevant factors were rarely addressed across websites. Improvements in these areas could lead to enhanced inhaler technique and clinical outcomes.

The Effect of Simulation-Based Education on Patient Training Correct Inhaler Technique of Nursing Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Introduction: Teaching inhaler techniques to nursing students is crucial. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effect of simulation-based education on patient training correct inhaler technique in nursing students. Methods: This is a single-blind, randomized controlled trial in which nursing students are randomly allocated into two groups of control (n = 41) and intervention (n = 40). The students' mean score of correct inhaler technique was measured before and one week after intervention, using checklists of inhaler techniques. Results: The mean score of control group was significantly lower than the intervention group (p < .001). The results also revealed that there was no significant difference in students' level of confidence regarding the ability to educate patients on inhaler techniques before the intervention, while all students were shown to have higher levels of confidence in this term after the intervention. Conclusions: Simulation is an effective way to train nursing students in the correct inhaler techniques.

Evaluation of the Association between Inhaler technique and Adherence in Asthma Control: Cross-Sectional Comparative Analysis Study between Amman and Baghdad

Purpose: Asthma is a chronic condition affecting millions of people all around the world. Asthma has no cure, but disease control is essential and highly recommended. However, the available tools for asthma control assessment don’t include factors such as inhaler technique and adherence. This study aimed to assess the correlation between inhaler techniques, adherence, and level of asthma control in two different healthcare settings; Jordan and Iraq. Patients and methods: A cross-sectional observational study was con-ducted over six months, from January to August 2018, in two public hospitals in Amman (Jordan) and Baghdad (Iraq). Asthmatic patients were interviewed to assess their inhaler technique, adherence, and asthma control. The researcher personally visited both public hospitals, conducting face-to-face interviews with patients at the hospital outpatient clinics. Validated questionnaires were used for patient assessment, including demographics, asthma history and medication use, the patient’s inhaler technique, adherence, and asthma control. Results: A total of 300 patients entered the study, with a mean age of 45.54 ± 13.71. The asthma control test showed very poor asthma control for patients living in both countries (Amman n=78 (52.0%) vs. Baghdad n=106 (70.0%)). An asthma knowledge assessment showed that most asthmatic patients in both countries didn’t follow their asthma medication plan (Amman n=78 (52.0%) vs. Baghdad n=93 (62.0%). Conclusion: In both Jordan and Iraq, asthma patients were found to be poorly controlled. Knowledge of patients was inadequate, probably leading to the poorly managed chronic disease. The results of this study highlight the significance of the pharmacist’s role in recognizing asthmatic patients requiring assistance. Furthermore, they underscore the pharmacist’s pivotal contribution to delivering patient education and counseling, ultimately resulting in enhanced asthma control. (AU)

Correlation of vitamin D receptor genotypes, specific IgE levels and other variables with asthma control in children.

INTRODUCTION: Asthma is a common condition affecting millions of children globally. The main goal of this study is to assess factors related to asthma management, particularly atopy level and the impact of genetic variants of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene. METHODS: Asthmatic children were enrolled in an outpatient respiratory clinic. Information on patients' medication adherence, medical and medication factors, and sociodemographic were gathered. Spirometry FEV1% and FVC% measurements, and the asthma control test were used to evaluate the severity of asthma, and genotyping of the VDR gene and radioallergosorbent test (RAST) were conducted. Regression analyses were conducted to evaluate variables associated with asthma control and spirometry measures. RESULTS: A total of 313 participants (67.4% males) were recruited in the current study. The mean age was 9.37 (±3.45) years. The mean score for adherence was 4.26 (±2.52), and only 46% of the participants had controlled asthma. Forward conditional stepwise binary regression showed that low and moderate Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) dose (OR= 0.42 (95% CI 0.20-0.90), p = 0.026; OR = 0.371 (95% CI 0.2-0.72), p = 0.003, respectively) decreased the odds of being in the controlled asthma group, while higher inhaler score (OR = 2.75 (95% CI 2.17-3.49, p < 0.001)) increased the odds of being in the controlled asthma group. However, results found no association between VDR genotype and asthma control, spirometry values or hospitalization due to asthma. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that many of the asthma patients had poorly controlled asthma. Factors that were associated with poor asthma control included poor inhaler technique.

The emerging role of digital health in the management of asthma.

The most common reasons seen for lack of asthma control include misconceptions about disease control, low controller treatment adherence, poor inhaler technique, and the resulting underuse of controllers and overuse of short-acting beta2 agonists (SABAs). Narrowing these care gaps may be achieved through well-designed patient education that considers the patient's motivation, beliefs, and capabilities regarding their asthma and its management and empowers the patient to become an active participant in treatment decisions. Digital health technologies (DHTs) and digital therapeutic (DT) devices provide new opportunities to monitor treatment behaviors, improve communication between healthcare providers and patients, and generate data that inform educational interactions. DHT and DT have been proven effective in enhancing patient self-management in other chronic conditions, particularly diabetes. Accelerated integration of DHT and DT into the management of asthma patients is facilitated by the use of digital inhalers that employ sensor technology ("smart" inhalers). These devices efficiently provide real-time feedback on controller adherence, SABA use, and inhaler technique that have the strong potential to optimize asthma control.

Errors in Metered Dose Inhaler Use Amongst Pediatric Asthma Patients.

Purpose: The aim of this paper is to use easily accessible smartphones as a straightforward means for physicians to objectively check Medical Device Inhaler (MDI) technique, without the need for additional devices. Additionally, we seek to assess the frequency of inhaler technique errors and their impact on asthma control. Patients and Methods: Thirty-two children between the ages of 5 and 18 receiving asthma therapy through MDIs were included. Three surveys were administered to all participants to gauge device history, asthma control, and patient characteristics. Patient technique was scored using inhaler audio signals recorded with a smartphone. For subjects that were able, forced oscillation technique (FOT) was performed during tidal breathing conditions before and after corticosteroid administration. Results: 81% (25/31) of participants used their MDIs incorrectly with the most common errors being rapid shallow breathing, inadequate breath-holding, and excessive actuations. Poor inhaler technique correlated with poorly controlled asthma symptoms. Conclusion: The use of smartphone recordings can a convenient way to evaluate technique errors and could allow patients to demonstrate and refine their technique and usage without a doctor's visit, ensuring proper technique and enhancing treatment effectiveness.

A cross sectional observational study on uncontrolled bronchial asthma and inhaler technique among out patients in a tertiary care centre in Western Maharashtra.

Background: The 2014 Asia Pacific - Asthma Insight and Management (AP-AIM) study showed that none of the Indian asthmatics had controlled asthma when evaluated objectively. Our study aims to detect through objective measurements, uncontrolled asthma in OPD patients, the adequacy of their inhaler technique, and their awareness regarding the importance of inhaler technique. Method: The asthma Control Test (ACT) score was used to screen for uncontrolled asthma. A validated objective questionnaire and scoring were used to objectively assess the correctness and awareness of the inhalation technique. Result: The study was carried out over 2 month period and 80 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were enrolled. Out of 80 patients; 47 (58.75%) had well-controlled asthma and 33 (41.25%) had uncontrolled asthma. 64 (80%) patients had good, and 16 (20%) had poor inhalation techniques. Among the 64 patients with good inhalation technique 43 (67.18%) had well-controlled asthma and 21 (32.82%) had uncontrolled asthma. Among the 16 patients with poor inhalation technique 4 (25%) had well-controlled asthma and 12 (75%) had uncontrolled asthma. There was a statistically significant association between asthma control and inhaler technique (P value 0.002). In the study population 56 (70%) patients were aware of the inhalation technique and 24 (30%) were unaware of the inhalation technique. Out of the 56 patients who were aware of the inhalation technique 53 (94.64%) had good inhaler technique and 3 (5.36%) had poor inhalation technique. Among the 24 patients who were unaware of the inhaler technique 11 (45.83%) had good inhaler technique and 13 (54.17%) had poor inhaler technique. There was a statistically significant association between awareness of inhaler technique and good inhaler technique (P value 0.001). Conclusion: There is a statistically significant association between asthma control and inhaler technique and between inhaler technique and inhaler awareness. Improving the awareness regarding inhaler technique among bronchial asthma patients is the way forward to improve asthma control in our country.

A systematic review of methods of scoring inhaler technique.

Many inhaler devices are currently used in clinical practice to deliver medication, with each inhaler device offering different benefits to overcome technique issues. Inhaler technique remains poor, contributing to reduced airway drug deposition and consequently poor disease control. Scoring inhaler technique has been used within research as an outcome measure of inhaler technique assessment, and this systematic review collates and evaluates these scoring methods. The review protocol was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020218869). A total of 172 articles were screened with 77 included, and the results presented using narrative synthesis due to the heterogeneity of the study design and data. The most frequently used scoring method awarded one point per step in the inhaler technique checklist and was included in 59/77 (77%) of articles; however limited and varied guidance was provided for score interpretation. Other inhaler technique scoring methods included grading the final inhaler technique score, expressing the total score as a percentage/ratio, deducting points from the final score when errors were made, and weighting steps within the checklist depending on how crucial the step was. Vast heterogeneity in the number of steps and content in the inhaler technique checklists was observed across all device types (range 5-19 steps). Only 4/77 (5%) of the inhaler technique measures had undertaken fundamental steps required in the scale development process for use in real world practice. This review demonstrates the demand for a tool that measures inhaler technique and highlights the current unmet need for one that has undergone validation.

Examining barriers and facilitators in asthma inhaler technique education and technology-enhanced educational tools in children: A mixed methods evaluation using the theoretical domains framework.

INTRODUCTION: Educational interventions for asthma inhaler technique have been identified as successful in improving technique in children, yet inhaler technique has not improved over time. New approaches should be considered, including the use of technology-based interventions such as smartphone and tablet applications. Adoption and implementation of such technology in healthcare has been historically slow. This mixed-methods study aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators of delivering and receiving asthma inhaler education for children in a hospital setting, including technology-based interventions. METHODS: Children with asthma, their caregivers, and healthcare professionals who regularly provide asthma education, were invited to participate in a qualitative interview and brief questionnaire to describe their experiences, knowledge, beliefs, and recommendations about asthma education delivery. The Theoretical Domains Framework was used to develop questions for the semistructured moderator guide, questionnaire, and provide the rigorous evaluation framework for deductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Sixteen interviews and questionnaires were conducted with participants. Overall, healthcare professionals perceived more barriers in asthma inhaler education delivery than asthmatic children and their caregivers to receiving the education. Healthcare professionals and caregivers identified time-pressures within a hospital setting as a barrier for providing sufficient education. However, all participants felt they had adequate knowledge in their asthma management skills and inhaler technique. Technology-based innovations were viewed positively by all participant groups to improve asthma education. CONCLUSIONS: Several barriers and facilitators to current hospital-based asthma education delivery were reported by target end-users. Future programs should consider these findings when developing asthma inhaler educational interventions, particularly those using technology-enhanced information delivery.

Identifying critical inhalation technique errors in Dry Powder Inhaler use in patients with COPD based on the association with health status and exacerbations: findings from the multi-country cross-sectional observational PIFotal study.

BACKGROUND: Correct inhaler use depends on a complex interplay of factors, including device preparation and generating sufficient inspiratory flow. It is currently unknown which inhalation technique errors can be considered critical in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients on Dry Powder Inhaler (DPI) maintenance therapy. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between inhalation technique errors and health status or exacerbations in patients with COPD. Additionally, the association between the number of errors and COPD outcomes was determined. METHODS: The PIFotal study is a cross-sectional multi-country observational study in a primary care setting, including 1434 COPD patients aged ≥ 40 years (50.1% female; mean age 69.2 yrs) using a DPI for their maintenance therapy. Inhalation technique was video recorded and scored by two independent researchers using inhaler-specific checklists. Health status was assessed with two questionnaires; the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) and the COPD Assessment Test (CAT). The number of moderate and severe exacerbations in the past 12 months was recorded. Critical errors were identified based on their association with health status or exacerbations through multi-level prediction models adjusted for identified confounding. RESULTS: Errors in inhalation technique steps 'Breathe in', 'Hold breath', and 'Breathe out calmly after inhalation' were significantly associated with poorer CCQ and CAT outcomes and thus deemed critical. None of the errors were significantly associated with moderate exacerbations. Patients with errors 'Preparation', 'Hold inhaler in correct position during inhalation', and 'Breathe in' had significantly more severe exacerbations, and therefore these errors were also deemed critical. 81.3% of patients with COPD made at least one critical error. Specific combinations of errors were associated with worse outcomes. The more inhalation technique errors identified, the poorer the health status and the higher the exacerbation rate. CONCLUSION: In this study, we identified multiple critical inhalation technique errors in COPD patients using DPIs each associated with poorer outcomes. Explorative analysis revealed that specific combinations of errors may be of clinical relevance, especially those related to the inhalation manoeuvre. COPD outcomes worsened with increasing error count. These results warrant further prospective longitudinal studies to establish the effect of correcting these errors on COPD control. TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04532853 (31/08/2020).

Objective Assessment of Adherence and Inhaler Technique among Asthma and COPD Patients in London: A Study in Community Pharmacies Using an Electronic Monitoring Device.

BACKGROUND: The INhaler Compliance Assessment (INCATM) device is an electronic monitoring device (EMD) that assesses both patient's adherence and inhaler technique (IT). This study aimed, first, to assess the value of using the INCATM device as an objective measure during medicine use review (MUR) consultations provided by community pharmacists (CPs) on patients' adherence and IT. Second, we aimed to explore patients' perceptions about the INCATM device. METHODS: A mixed methods approach was used, involving two phases. Phase one was a service evaluation in independent community pharmacies in London with a before-and-after study design. The service included provision of an MUR consultation to asthma and COPD patients using objective feedback about adherence and IT generated with the INCATM device. Descriptive and inferential statistics were performed using SPSS. Phase two involved semi-structured interviews with respiratory patients. Thematic analysis was performed to generate key findings. MAIN FINDINGS: Eighteen patients participated in the study (12 COPD and 6 asthma). The results showed significant improvement in the INCATM actual adherence from 30% to 68% (p = 0.001) and significant reduction in IT error rate from 51% to 12% (p = 0.002) after conducting the service. Analysis of the interviews revealed patients' positive attitudes in terms of the perceived benefits of the technology and a desire for future use and recommendation for others. Patients had also positive attitudes towards the consultations provided. CONCLUSION: Embedding an objective measure about adherence and IT during CPs' consultations showed a significant improvement in patients' adherence and IT and was accepted by patients as well.

[Assessment of inhalation technique in patients with bronchial asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease].

AIM: Investigate inhalation techniques using different inhalers types and their effect on the course of disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 110 patients with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using the inhaler at least one month. Inhaler errors performed during demonstration were evaluated for each patient and entered in the check-lists. We also collected information about co-morbidities, education, mMRC dyspnea score, rate of exacerbations, and performed spirometry. RESULTS: 80.9% of patients used metered-dose inhaler, 20.9% - single-dose and 21.8% - multiple-dose dry powder inhaler, 22.7% - soft-mist inhaler. Inhaler errors were made by 80.9% patients. The mean number of mistakes in metered-dose inhaler use was 2±1.6, single-dose powder inhaler -1.5±1.3, multiple-dose dry powder inhaler - 1.25±1.4, soft-mist inhaler - 0.68±0.7 (р=0.003). Age, diagnosis, duration of disease, education level, inhalers usage by relatives have no influence on the inhalation technique. A number of errors was related to female gender (р=0.007) and usage of more than 2 inhalers (r=0.3, p=0.002), previous instruction about inhalation technique (r=0.3, p=0.001). On the other hand, there were correlations between the number of errors and degree of bronchial obstruction, asthma control, severity of dyspnea by mMRC score, exacerbation rate. CONCLUSION: Patients with bronchoobstructive diseases perform many inhaler errors, that substantially influences the severity and course of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Recognizing and Tackling Inhaler Technique Decay in Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disesase (COPD) Clinical Practice.

A poor inhaler technique continues to represent a substantial barrier to effective asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease management. It can result in perceived lack of treatment effectiveness even with apparent adherence to a prescribed regimen of inhaled maintenance therapies, potentially resulting in an unnecessary change or escalation of treatment. Many patients are not trained to inhaler mastery in real-world practice; furthermore, even where mastery is initially achieved, an ongoing assessment and education are seldom maintained. In this review, we present an overview of the evidence for deterioration of the inhaler technique over time after training, investigate the factors that contribute to this deterioration, and explore innovative approaches to addressing the problem. We also propose steps forward drawn from the literature and our clinical insights.

Inhalation Devices in 7- to 15-Year-Old Children with Asthma - A Patient Preference Study.

Background: Inhalation therapy is the cornerstone of treatment of bronchial asthma. A patient-specific selection of inhalation devices is necessary, as preference for a device plays an important role in terms of error rates in handling and adherence to therapy. However, there is no industry-independent study providing information on children's preferences for common inhaler types. The aim of the present study was to investigate the preference of asthmatic children for inhaler types commonly used in Germany. The effects of age, gender and the type of school visited on device preferences as well as the frequency of patient education and the role of health care providers in the choice for an inhaler were investigated. Methods: Eighty children were included in this prospective cross-sectional study (age: 10.87 ± 2.62 years). The analysis was based on a questionnaire and validated checklists. All participants tested the use of nine placebo inhalers (Breezhaler, Diskus, Respimat, Spiromax, Turbohaler, Autohaler, metered-dose inhaler, Easyhaler and Novolizer) in a randomized order. For each device, patients were asked to assess handling, rate different device characteristics and name the device they would prefer most or least. Results: The most favored device was the Novolizer. Moreover, the Spiromax scored highest in numerous categories such as suitability in emergencies and "easiest" device to use. Patient preferences with respect to the addressed inhaler features were not significantly related to age, gender or school type. Conclusion: The Novolizer and the Spiromax showed higher preference in pediatric patients as compared to other tested devices. Overall, there were significant differences in terms of preference when comparing the tested inhalers in different aspects.

Assessing Inhaler Techniques of Asthma Patients Using Aerosol Inhalation Monitors (AIM): A Cross-Sectional Study.

A high percentage of asthma patients have symptoms that are not well controlled, despite effective drugs being available. One potential reason for this may be that poor inhaler technique limits the dose delivered to the lungs, thereby reducing the therapeutic efficacy. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of poor inhaler technique in an asthma patient population and to probe the impact of various demographic parameters on technique quality. This study was conducted at community pharmacies across Wales, UK. Patients diagnosed with asthma and 12 years or older were invited to participate. An aerosol inhalation monitor (AIM, Vitalograph®) was used to measure the quality of patient inhaler technique. A total of 295 AIM assessments were carried out. There were significant differences in the quality of inhaler technique across the different inhaler types (p < 0.001, Chi squared). The best technique was associated with dry-powder inhalers (DPI devices, 58% of 72 having good technique), compared with pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDI) or pMDIs with a spacer device (18% of 174 and 47% of 49 AIM assessments, respectively). There were some significant associations between gender, age, and quality of inhaler technique, as determined with adjusted odds ratios. It seems that the majority of asthmatic patients were not using their inhalers appropriately. We recommend that healthcare professionals place more emphasis on assessing and correcting inhaler technique, as poor inhaler technique might be responsible for the observed lack of symptom control in the asthma patient population.

Opportunistic optimization of inhaler technique in hospitalized adults with asthma: a two-phase educational study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate effectiveness of two different educational methods to improve inhaler techniques in patients with prior diagnosis of asthma, hospitalized with a non-asthma-related diagnosis. METHODS: We undertook a real-world, opportunistic quality-improvement project. Inhaler technique in hospitalized patients with prior diagnosis of asthma was assessed in two cohorts over two 12-week cycles using a standardized device-specific proforma of seven-step inhaler technique, classed: "good" if 6/7 steps achieved; "fair" if 5/7 compliant; "poor" for others. Baseline data was collected in both cycles. Cycle one involved face-to-face education by a healthcare professional; cycle two involved additional use of an electronic device to show device-specific videos (asthma.org.uk). In both cycles, patients were reassessed within two days for improvements and the two methods compared for effectiveness. RESULTS: During cycle one 32/40 patients were reassessed within 48 h; eight lost to follow-up. During cycle two 38/40 patients were reassessed within 48 h; two lost to follow-up During cycle one, two and 12 had good/fair baseline technique respectively, and 26 poor. Most commonly missed steps were no expiry check/not rinsing mouth after steroid use. On reassessment 17% patients improved from poor to fair/good. During cycle two, initial technique assessment identified: 23 poor; 12 fair; five good. Post-videos, 35% of patients improved from poor to fair/good. Proportion of patients improving from poor to fair, or poor/fair to good increased in cycle two vs one (52.5% vs 33%). CONCLUSION: Visual instruction is associated with improved technique compared to verbal feedback. This is a user-friendly and cost-effective approach to patient education.

An Augmented Reality Technology to Provide Demonstrative Inhaler Technique Education for Patients With Asthma: Interview Study Among Patients, Health Professionals, and Key Community Stakeholders.

BACKGROUND: Many people with asthma use incorrect inhaler technique, resulting in suboptimal disease management and increased health service use. Novel ways of delivering appropriate instructions are needed. OBJECTIVE: This study explored stakeholder perspectives on the potential use of augmented reality (AR) technology to improve asthma inhaler technique education. METHODS: On the basis of existing evidence and resources, an information poster displaying the images of 22 asthma inhaler devices was developed. Using AR technology via a free smartphone app, the poster launched video demonstrations of correct inhaler technique for each device. In total, 21 semistructured, one-on-one interviews with health professionals, people with asthma, and key community stakeholders were conducted, and data were analyzed thematically using the Triandis model of interpersonal behavior. RESULTS: A total of 21 participants were recruited into the study, and data saturation was achieved. People with asthma were confident with inhaler technique (mean score 9.17, SD 1.33, out of 10). However, health professionals and key community stakeholders identified that this perception was misguided (mean 7.25, SD 1.39, and mean 4.5, SD 0.71, for health professionals and key community stakeholders, respectively) and facilitates persistent incorrect inhaler use and suboptimal disease management. Delivering inhaler technique education using AR was favored by all participants (21/21, 100%), particularly around ease of use, with the ability to visually display inhaler techniques for each device. There was a strongly held belief that the technology has the capacity for improving inhaler technique across all participant groups (mean 9.25, SD 0.89, for participants; mean 9.83, SD 0.41, for health professionals; and mean 9.5, SD 0.71, for key community stakeholders). However, all participants (21/21, 100%) identified some barriers, particularly regarding access and appropriateness of AR for older people. CONCLUSIONS: AR technology may be a novel means to address poor inhaler technique among certain cohorts of patients with asthma and serve as a prompt for health professionals to initiate review of inhaler devices. A randomized controlled trial design is needed to evaluate the efficacy of this technology for use in the clinical care setting.