The spectrum of factor XI deficiency in Southeast China: four recurrent variants can explain most of the deficiencies.

BACKGROUND: Factor XI (FXI) deficiency is an autosomal hemorrhagic disorder characterized by reduced plasma FXI levels. Multiple ancestral variants in the F11 gene have been identified in Ashkenazi Jews and other selected European populations. However, there are few reports of predominant variants in Chinese and/or East Asian populations. The aim of this study is to characterize the genotypes and phenotypes of FXI deficiency and identify the predominant variants. RESULTS: Of the 41 FXI-deficient patients, 39 exhibited severe FXI defects, considerably more than those with partial defects. The APTT levels showed a negative correlation with FXI activity levels (coefficient=-0.584, P < .001). Only nine patients experienced mild bleeding, including one partially defective patient and eight severely defective patients. The majority of patients were referred for preoperative screenings (n = 22) and checkups (n = 14). Genetic analysis revealed that 90% of the patients had genetic defects, with 2, 16, and 19 cases of heterozygous, homozygous, and compound heterozygous patients, respectively. Seventeen variants were detected in the F11 gene (6 novel), including eleven missense variants, four nonsense variants, and two small deletions scattered throughout the F11. Of the 11 missense variants, six have not yet been studied for in vitro expression. Protein modeling analyses indicated that all of these variants disrupted local structural stability by altering side-chain orientation and hydrogen bonds. Nine variants, consisting of three missense and six null variants, were detected with a frequency of two or more. The highest allele frequency was observed in p.Q281* (21.25%), p.W246* (17.50%), p.Y369* (12.50%), and p.L442Cfs*8 (12.50%). The former two were variants specific to East Asia, while the remaining two were southeast China-specific variants. CONCLUSION: Our population-based cohort demonstrated that no correlation between the level of FXI activity and the bleeding severity in FXI deficiency. Additionally, the prevalence of FXI deficiency may have been underestimated. The nonsense p.Q281* was the most common variant in southeast China, suggesting a possible founder effect.

Pain attitudes and pain outcomes among people with bleeding disorders: Results from community voices in research.

INTRODUCTION: Among people with bleeding disorders (PwBD), pain is a major problem and pain treatments are often ineffective. Understanding of psychological factors involved in pain processing is limited. Maladaptive pain attitudes are associated with worse pain outcomes and adaptive pain attitudes are associated with better outcomes in high pain conditions, but relationships between pain attitudes and pain outcomes are so far unexplored among PwBD. AIM: To investigate relationships between pain attitudes and pain outcomes among PwBD. METHODS: Pain attitudes were measured with the Survey of Pain Attitudes, containing two adaptive scales (Control and Emotion) and five maladaptive scales (Disability, Harm, Medication, Solicitude, Medical Cure). Adults with bleeding disorders, who had pain, and were enrolled in Community Voices in Research were eligible. Participants (n = 72) completed an online survey. Cross sectional associations between pain attitudes and pain outcomes (pain and prescribed pain medication use) were investigated using logistic regression. RESULTS: After adjustment for covariates, greater Control attitudes were associated with lower odds of more severe pain, and greater Disability, Harm, and Medication attitudes were all associated with higher odds of more severe pain and with higher odds of any prescribed pain medication use and opioid pain medication use. CONCLUSIONS: We presented compelling evidence of relationships between pain attitudes and pain outcomes in PwBD, though corroboration is needed from other populations. Our findings suggest that modification of pain attitudes presents a possible avenue for interventions to improve pain outcomes and increase patient satisfaction with pain management.

Cross-cultural assessment of the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the perceived mental health and medical experiences of persons with inherited bleeding disorders and their parents/guardians.

BACKGROUND: Objectives were to 1) assess COVID-19-associated medical and psychological challenges facing persons with inherited bleeding disorders (PIBD) and their parents/guardians (PG) in Germany, the US, and the UK; 2) describe similarities and differences among these countries; 3) identify needs and opportunities for intervention by patient advocacy organizations (PAGs). RESEARCH DESIGN & METHODS: A cross-sectional, international survey was conducted in three countries using validated psychometric instruments and investigator-developed items. RESULTS: Five hundred and four surveys were included. Significant differences between countries were found including experiences with medical care, specific thoughts, and concerns about COVID-19, anxiety, and other mental health measures, as well as resources used to cope with stress. Age, education, income, race, IBD diagnosis, PIBD vs. BD group, and gender had moderating effects on resources used. Communication with friends/relatives and use of PAG and HTCs as resources for information/coping decreased in all countries during the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: There were similarities and differences between respondents across the country in the perceived impact of the pandemic, mental health scores, and strategies used to cope with stress.  Recommendations: strategies to increase PAG access for PIBD and their PG during pandemics and natural disasters, ongoing assessment and adaptation to provide supportive resources to specific patient subgroups.

Persons with inherited bleeding disorders (PIBD) and their parents faced many challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. An online survey was conducted within three countries: Germany, the United States, and the United Kingdom to explore these challenges and address how patient advocacy organizations can better meet their needs. Areas explored included experiences with medical care, concerns, and thoughts expressed during the pandemic, and coping resources used before and during the pandemic. In addition, mental health issues were explored addressing anxiety, COVID-related fears, depression, and resilience. Differences were found regarding experiences with medical care, specific thoughts, and concerns about COVID-19, anxiety, and other mental health measures, as well as resources used to cope with stress. These results provide an opportunity for advocacy organizations for PIBD to develop appropriate assessment, adaptation, and education resources to help patients during pandemics and/or natural disasters in the future.

National strategic advocacy to manage patients with inherited bleeding disorders in low and lower-middle income countries.

INTRODUCTION: Inherited bleeding disorders (IBDs) including hemophilia, von Willebrand disease, platelet disorders, mucocutaneous bleeding disorders and coagulation factor deficiencies are rarely found and under-recognized in low and lower-middle-income countries. Some patients succumbed to serious bleeding without diagnosis and treatment during childhood. AREA COVERED: Diagnosis, management, and prevention should be integrated into the existing health care system. Although some countries have not implemented appropriate health care infrastructure, an initiative plan should be set up by cooperation of experienced experts and health care providers. Identification of patients with IBDs should be started in the antenatal setting to search for females at risk of carrier state. The investigations include bleeding assessment, mixing venous clotting time, coagulogram, coagulation factor assay and mutation detection. Genotypic analysis is helpful for confirming the definite diagnosis, carrier detection as well as prenatal diagnosis for females at risk of bearing an offspring with severe bleeding manifestations. Management involves replacement therapy ranging from blood component to virus-inactivated factor concentrate. Appropriate research is an essential backbone for improving patients' care. EXPERT OPINION: Effective national strategic advocacy to manage patients with IBDs requires intensive collaboration among policy makers, health care providers, patients, and family members.

Psychological Burden Among Patients With Inherited Bleeding Disorders in Madinah Province, Saudi Arabia.

Introduction Hereditary bleeding disorders, such as hemophilia and von Willebrand disease (VWD), result from specific deficiencies or malformations in the coagulation cascade proteins. These disorders can significantly impact both physical and psychological health. Complications such as depression, anxiety, and stress (DAS) can further exacerbate these impacts. Despite their significance, detailed prevalence data remain limited, especially for regions such as Madinah province in Saudi Arabia. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of DAS and their associated risk factors among patients with hereditary bleeding disorders in Madinah province, Saudi Arabia. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study using telephonic interviews involving patients diagnosed with severe hemophilia A or B or VWD attending a hematology clinic in Madinah. Patients over 10 were included, and the study excluded those with central nervous system insults and platelet count concerns. The validated and reliable Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21-item questionnaire and Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS), version 26.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Armonk, NY), facilitated data collection and analysis, respectively. Results Of the 44 patients studied, 25% exhibited symptoms of depression, 45.5% showed signs of anxiety, and 29.5% had stress symptoms. Regarding symptom severity, 9.1% of patients experienced extremely severe depression, 15.9% had moderate anxiety, and 13.6% reported moderate stress. The prevalence of these psychological issues varied with patients' age and economic status. Notably, a significantly higher rate of depression was observed in patients over 15 years (42.9% vs. 8.7%; p=0.009). Additionally, while not statistically significant, patients with a high economic status reported increased rates of DAS. Conclusions Patients with inherited bleeding disorders, particularly those older than 15, manifest significant psychological distress. There is a pressing need for enhanced awareness, specialized screenings, and tailored counseling services to improve treatment adherence and overall quality of life. Given the findings, a comprehensive national study in Saudi Arabia is highly recommended, alongside the integration of specialized psychological services.

A national assessment of standards of care for inherited bleeding disorders in Canada.

AIM: The Canadian Integrated and Comprehensive Care Standards for Inherited Bleeding Disorders were adopted in June 2020. In early 2023, a self-assessment of each of the 26 Canadian inherited bleeding disorder treatment centre's (IBDTCs) capacity to meet the Standards was conducted. The goal was to validate the standards by assessing appropriateness and adherence. As a result, centres can compare their own practices and capacity against those of all centres, identify barriers to adherence, identify opportunities for remedial actions and use the results locally as evidence for needed resources. METHODS: Healthcare providers (HCPs) in the 26 IBDTCs were provided with a checklist to assess adherence to each of the 66 standards of care. Centre participation was voluntary but strongly encouraged by the healthcare provider and patient associations. RESULTS: All 26 centres completed the self-assessments. Collectively, centres reported meeting 88.8% of the standards. Adherence to each standard ranged from 40% to 100%. Forty-one (41) of the standards were adhered to by 90% or more of the centres, 12 by 80%-89% of the centres and 13 by fewer than 80% of the centres. A report consolidating all the assessments was sent to the 26 centres. CONCLUSION: None of the comments received in the self-assessment reports indicated that a given standard was irrelevant, unrealistic or unnecessary. These data are strong indicators that the standards, as written, are appropriate. The self-assessments, however, reveal alarming deficiencies in staffing levels, notably in physiotherapy, psychosocial support and data entry and data management. These constitute a barrier to comprehensive care for many centres. The findings echo similar conclusions from a previous assessment conducted in 2015.

Patient-centered care in von Willebrand disease: are we there yet?

INTRODUCTION: Von Willebrand Disease is the most common inherited bleeding disorder. Paradoxically, affected individuals are often misdiagnosed and experience substantial diagnostic delay. There are sex-specific health disparities in VWD rooted in the stigmatization of vaginal bleeding, which leads to symptom dismissal, lack of timely access to care and lower health-related quality of life. AREAS COVERED: Following the core elements of patient-centered care - respect for patient preferences, values, and needs, we describe the current state of VWD care. Challenges of diagnostic delay, serial misrecognition of abnormal bleeding, and symptom dismissal are barriers that disproportionately affect women with VWD. These negative effects are further amplified in individuals living in low- and middle-income countries. We describe the importance of coordinated multidisciplinary care, as well as the need for patient education and empowered self-advocacy. EXPERT OPINION: While tremendous work has been done to improve the diagnosis and management of VWD, timely and high-quality research is urgently needed to address care gaps. Systemic changes such as resource investment, dedicated research funding for novel treatment modalities, and effective knowledge translation strategies to address structural barriers are needed to facilitate effective patient-centered care for VWD.

A cohort study and matched pair analysis evaluating the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on access to dental care for people with inherited bleeding disorders.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with inherited bleeding disorders (IBDs) can experience challenges in accessing dental care. The COVID-19 pandemic saw the cessation of routine dentistry in England. This study aims to highlight whether access to dental care for patients with IBDs was impacted by the pandemic, and whether the severity of their IBD impacts patients experience of dental care. METHODS: Patients over the age of 18 with Haemophilia A and B, Von Willibrands (VWD), Bernard-Soulier syndrome (BSS) and Glanzmann's disease were recruited. One hundred and seventy-eight patients were called and invited to complete a questionnaire. Full cohort and matched pair analysis was performed. RESULTS: Seventy participants completed the questionnaire (62 males, mean age 39.9), 26 had a mild IBD and 44 severe. Mild and severe patients were matched on IBD, gender, deprivation index and age. Thirty-one percent of patients tried to seek dental advice during the pandemic. Eighty-one percent of mild patients saw a dentist routinely prior to the pandemic, compared to 58% of severe patients. Doctors were more likely to discuss the importance of dental prevention with patients with severe IBDs (p = .0042). CONCLUSION: Fewer patients with severe IBDs accessed regular dental care compared to their matched pair counterparts prior to the pandemic. This could indicate that access to care is more difficult for those with severe IBDs. Patients felt that oral health is relevant to their IBD. While doctors were more likely to discuss the importance of preventing dental disease with patients who have severe IBDs, the profession needs to ensure this translates into routine engagement.

Rare inherited coagulation and fibrinolytic defects that challenge diagnostic laboratories.

BACKGROUND: Coagulation factors, anticoagulants, and fibrinolytic proteins are important for hemostasis, and mutations affecting these proteins causes some rare inherited bleeding disorders that are particularly challenging to diagnose. AIMS: This review provides current information on rare inherited bleeding disorders that are difficult to diagnose. MATERIAL & METHODS: A review of the literature was conducted for up to date information on rare and difficult to diagnose bleeding disorders. RESULTS: Some rare bleeding disorders cause an inherited deficiency of multiple coagulation factors (F), such as combined FV and FVIII deficiency and familial vitamin K-dependent clotting factor deficiency. Additionally, congenital disorders of glycosylation can affect a variety of procoagulant and anticoagulant proteins and also platelets. Some bleeding disorders reflect mutations with unique impairments in the procoagulant/anticoagulant balance, including those caused by F5 mutations that secondarily increase the plasma levels of tissue factor pathway inhibitor as well as THBD mutations that increase functional thrombomodulin in plasma or cause a consumptive coagulopathy due to thrombomodulin deficiency. Some bleeding disorders accelerate fibrinolysis due to loss-of-function mutations in SERPINE1 and SERPINF2 or in the case of Quebec platelet disorder, a duplication mutation that rewires PLAU and selectively increases expression in megakaryocytes, resulting in a unique platelet-dependent gain-of-function defect in fibrinolysis. DISCUSSION: Current information on rare and difficult to diagnose bleeding disorders indicates they have unique clinical and laboratory features, and pathogenic characteristics to consider for diagnostic evaluation. CONCLUSION: Laboratories and clinicians should consider rare inherited disorders, and difficult to diagnose conditions, in their strategy for diagnosing bleeding disorders.

Testing strategies used in the diagnosis of rare inherited bleeding disorders.

INTRODUCTION: Rare Bleeding Disorders have a low population prevalence and may not be recognized by most clinicians. In addition, knowledge gaps of the indicated laboratory tests and their availability add to the potential for delayed diagnosis or misdiagnosis. The lack of widely available commercial, regulatory body approved esoteric tests limits them to reference laboratories, thus limiting easy access for patients. AREAS COVERED: A literature search of PubMed, Medline, and Embase and a review of international society guidelines were performed. Additional references from published articles were reviewed. A patient-centered approach to recognition and evaluation of RBD is discussed. EXPERT OPINION: Recognition of RBD relies on obtaining a detailed patient's personal and family hemostatic history. Inquiry into a history of involvement of other organ systems is important and, if present, should lead to suspicion of an inherited platelet disorder or a variant of Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome. Multiple factors contribute to the complexity of developing efficient algorithms for diagnostic testing. Limitations in diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of screening tests, diagnostic tests, and esoteric tests further compound the complexity of establishing a diagnosis. Educational efforts focusing on clinician awareness of RBDs and available testing options are vital for optimal management of such patients.

The length of the sanitary napkins can be used as a handier index than pictorial blood loss assessment chart to predict the heavy menstrual bleeding.

AIM: Many women with inherited bleeding disorders are not diagnosed because of a lack of appropriate indicators. This study aimed to assess the predictability of the pictorial blood loss assessment chart (PBAC) as an indicator of menorrhagia and identify an easy indicator of menorrhagia resulting from bleeding disorders. METHODS: A multicenter study enrolled 9 patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD), 23 hemophilia carriers, and 71 controls aged 20-45 years who completed PBACs for two menstrual cycles as well as questionnaires. RESULTS: The PBAC scores of the VWD were significantly higher than those of other groups, even in multivariate analysis with age and sanitary item factors (p = 0.014). A PBAC score of 100 was not an appropriate cutoff because of its low specificity (VWD: sensitivity, 100; specificity, 29.5; hemophilia carriers: 74 and 29.5, respectively). In the ROC analysis, the cutoff of optimal PBAC for VWD was 171 (sensitivity, 66.7; specificity, 72.3; AUC, 0.7296). As the pad length increased, the total length of the pads used during one menstrual period could be a new and easy indicator. However, the cutoff for VWD was 735 cm (sensitivity, 42.9; specificity, 94.3; AUC 0.6837). A threshold could not be established for the hemophilia carrier. Therefore, we multiplied the coefficient by the length of thick pads, which caused a lower PBAC. For the VWD, the sensitivity increased to 85.7 (specificity, 77.1). For the hemophilia carrier, sensitivity (66.7) and specificity (88.6) could be separated from the control. CONCLUSIONS: The total length of the pads with a thick-pad adjustment can be a simple method to identify bleeding disorders.

Endodontic therapy in patients with inherited bleeding disorders: a scoping review.

This systematic scoping review aimed to map available evidence regarding endodontic therapy in patients with inherited bleeding disorders (IBDs). Studies in medicine or dentistry were selected if they reported on endodontic therapy in individuals with IBDs such as hemophilia A, hemophilia B, or von Willebrand disease. Two independent researchers performed searches and screening in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. The search initially yielded 676 potentially relevant studies, 14 of which were included in the final analysis. Of these 14 studies, 3 were classified as consensus statements or guidelines, 3 as observational studies, 2 as reviews, 5 as case reports, and 1 as an editorial. Most of the evidence regarding prophylactic treatment (eg, blood transfusion, replacement therapy, or medication administration) prior to endodontic therapy was derived from observational studies. The most frequently reported procedure was endodontic therapy, while 1 case report described a surgical endodontic procedure. Most studies included in the analysis reported that these procedures could be performed under local anesthesia. Two case reports and 1 observational study described complications after endodontic therapy in patients with IBDs. This scoping review revealed a lack of well-designed studies related to the topic of endodontic therapy in patients with IBDs. The available evidence suggests that endodontic therapy in patients with IBDs can be considered a low-risk procedure; local anesthesia should be used in most cases when patients with IBDs are treated, but the use of prophylactic measures is preferred when nerve block anesthesia is required; endodontic therapy can be conducted in a clinical setting without the need for hospital admittance; and, although the number of reported complications is small, the risk should not be ignored.

Building the foundation for a community-generated national research blueprint for inherited bleeding disorders: facilitating research through infrastructure, workforce, resources and funding.

BACKGROUND: The National Hemophilia Foundation (NHF) conducted extensive, inclusive community consultations to guide prioritization of research in coming decades in alignment with its mission to find cures and address and prevent complications enabling people and families with blood disorders to thrive. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: With the American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network, NHF recruited multidisciplinary expert working groups (WG) to distill the community-identified priorities into concrete research questions and score their feasibility, impact, and risk. WG6 was charged with identifying the infrastructure, workforce development, and funding and resources to facilitate the prioritized research. Community input on conclusions was gathered at the NHF State of the Science Research Summit. RESULTS: WG6 detailed a minimal research capacity infrastructure threshold, and opportunities to enable its attainment, for bleeding disorders centers to participate in prospective, multicenter national registries. They identified challenges and opportunities to recruit, retain, and train the diverse multidisciplinary care and research workforce required into the future. Innovative collaborative approaches to trial design, resource networking, and funding to surmount obstacles facing research in rare disorders were elucidated. CONCLUSIONS: The innovations in infrastructure, workforce development, and resources and funding proposed herein may contribute to facilitating a National Research Blueprint for Inherited Bleeding Disorders.

Research is critical to advancing the diagnosis and care of people with inherited bleeding disorders (PWIBD). This research requires significant infrastructure, including people and resources. Hemophilia treatment centers (HTC) need many different skilled care professionals including doctors, nurses, and other providers; also statisticians, data managers, and other experts to process patients' clinical information into research. Attracting diverse qualified professionals to the clinical and research work requires long-term planning, recruiting individuals in training programs and retaining them as they become experts. Research infrastructure includes physical servers running database software, networks that link them, and the environment in which these components function. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network (ATHN) coordinate and fund data collection at HTCs on the health and well-being of thousands of PWIBD into a registry used in research studies.National Hemophilia Foundation (NHF) and ATHN asked our group of health care professionals, technology experts, and lived experience experts (LEE) to identify the infrastructure, workforce, and resources needed to do the research most important to PWIBD. We identified the types of CDC/ATHN studies all HTCs should be able to perform, and the physical and human infrastructure this requires. We prioritized finding the best clinical trial designs to study inherited bleeding disorders, identifying ways to share personnel and tools between HTCs, and innovating how research is governed and funded. Involving LEEs in designing, managing, and carrying out research will be key in conducting research to improve the lives of PWIBD.

Building the foundation for a community-generated national research blueprint for inherited bleeding disorders: research priorities for mucocutaneous bleeding disorders.

BACKGROUND: Excessive or abnormal mucocutaneous bleeding (MCB) may impact all aspects of the physical and psychosocial wellbeing of those who live with it (PWMCB). The evidence base for the optimal diagnosis and management of disorders such as inherited platelet disorders, hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT), hypermobility spectrum disorders (HSD), Ehlers-Danlos syndromes (EDS), and von Willebrand disease (VWD) remains thin with enormous potential for targeted research. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: National Hemophilia Foundation and American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network initiated the development of a National Research Blueprint for Inherited Bleeding Disorders with extensive all-stakeholder consultations to identify the priorities of people with inherited bleeding disorders and those who care for them. They recruited multidisciplinary expert working groups (WG) to distill community-identified priorities into concrete research questions and score their feasibility, impact, and risk. RESULTS: WG2 detailed 38 high priority research questions concerning the biology of MCB, VWD, inherited qualitative platelet function defects, HDS/EDS, HHT, bleeding disorder of unknown cause, novel therapeutics, and aging. CONCLUSIONS: Improving our understanding of the basic biology of MCB, large cohort longitudinal natural history studies, collaboration, and creative approaches to novel therapeutics will be important in maximizing the benefit of future research for the entire MCB community.

More people experience mucocutaneous bleeding (MCB), affecting tissues like skin and gums, than have hemophilia A or B. MCB is not understood as well as hemophilia. Common types of MCB include nosebleeds, bleeding gums, heavy menstrual bleeding, and digestive tract bleeding. Mucocutaneous inherited bleeding disorders include inherited platelet disorders, hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT), hypermobility spectrum disorders (HSD) and Ehlers-Danlos syndromes (EDS), von Willebrand Disease (VWD), and others. Diagnosing and treating MCB is complicated and sometimes medical providers dismiss the bleeding that patients report when they cannot find a medical explanation for it. Many people with mucocutaneous bleeding (PWMCB) do not receive the care they need; for example, women with VWD live with symptoms for, on average, 16 years before they are diagnosed in the US. This struggle to obtain care has important negative impacts on patients' physical and psychological health and their quality-of-life. The National Hemophilia Foundation (NHF), a large US bleeding disorders patient advocacy organization, set out to develop a National Research Blueprint for Inherited Bleeding Disorders focused on community priorities. They brought together a group of patients, providers, and researchers with MCB expertise to identify the research that would most improve the lives of PWMCB through targeted and accessible diagnostics and therapies. We report in this paper that research is needed to better understand the biology of MCB and to define the mechanisms of disease in these disorders. We also describe high priority research questions for each of the main disorders, novel therapeutics, and aging.

Building the foundation for a community-generated national research blueprint for inherited bleeding disorders: research priorities to transform the care of people with hemophilia.

BACKGROUND: Decades of research have transformed hemophilia from severely limiting children's lives to a manageable disorder compatible with a full, active life, for many in high-income countries. The direction of future research will determine whether exciting developments truly advance health equity for all people with hemophilia (PWH). National Hemophilia Foundation (NHF) and American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network conducted extensive inclusive all-stakeholder consultations to identify the priorities of people with inherited bleeding disorders and those who care for them. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Working group (WG) 1 of the NHF State of the Science Research Summit distilled the community-identified priorities for hemophilia A and B into concrete research questions and scored their feasibility, impact, and risk. RESULTS: WG1 defined 63 top priority research questions concerning arthropathy/pain/bone health, inhibitors, diagnostics, gene therapy, the pediatric to adult transition of care, disparities faced by the community, and cardiovascular disease. This research has the potential to empower PWH to thrive despite lifelong comorbidities and achieve new standards of wellbeing, including psychosocial. CONCLUSIONS: Collaborative research and care delivery will be key to capitalizing on current and horizon treatments and harnessing technical advances to improve diagnostics and testing, to advance health equity for all PWH.

Hemophilia is the best known of the inherited bleeding disorders (BD). This is a rare condition that causes disproportionate bleeding, often into joints and vital organs. Factor replacement, injecting recombinant or plasma-based clotting factor products directly into the vein, became commonplace to control the disorder in the 1990s and 2000s. Prophylaxis, or injecting replacement factor every few days into people with hemophilia (PWH), has revolutionized patients' lives. In the last few years, other advances in new therapies have entered this space, such as non-factor replacement therapies and gene therapy. With many more research advances on the horizon, the National Hemophilia Foundation (NHF) initiated a State of the Science Research Summit in 2020. This event was attended by over 880 interested parties to help design an agenda of research priorities for inherited BDs for the next decade, based on community consultations. NHF formed multiple Working Groups (WG), each exploring a theme resulting from the community consultations, and presenting their results at the Summit. Led by 2 hematologists who manage and treat PWH daily, the 21-community member WG1 assigned to hemophilia A and B divided into 7 subgroups to identify and organize research priorities for different topic areas. The outcomes focused on prioritizing patients' needs, technological advances, and research in the areas of greatest potential for PWH and those who care for them. The results are a roadmap for the future execution of a research plan that truly serves the community.

Building the foundation for a community-generated national research blueprint for inherited bleeding disorders: research priorities in health services; diversity, equity, and inclusion; and implementation science.

BACKGROUND: The National Hemophilia Foundation (NHF) conducted extensive all-stakeholder inherited bleeding disorder (BD) community consultations to inform a blueprint for future research. Sustaining and expanding the specialized and comprehensive Hemophilia Treatment Center care model, to better serve all people with inherited BDs (PWIBD), and increasing equitable access to optimal health emerged as top priorities. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: NHF, with the American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network (ATHN), convened multidisciplinary expert working groups (WG) to distill priority research initiatives from consultation findings. WG5 was charged with prioritizing health services research (HSR); diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI); and implementation science (IS) research initiatives to advance community-identified priorities. RESULTS: WG5 identified multiple priority research themes and initiatives essential to capitalizing on this potential. Formative studies using qualitative and mixed methods approaches should be conducted to characterize issues and meaningfully investigate interventions. Investment in HSR, DEI and IS education, training, and workforce development are vital. CONCLUSIONS: An enormous amount of work is required in the areas of HSR, DEI, and IS, which have received inadequate attention in inherited BDs. This research has great potential to evolve the experiences of PWIBD, deliver transformational community-based care, and advance health equity.

Research into how people get their health care, called health services research, is important to understand if care is being delivered equitably and efficiently. This research figures out how to provide the best care at the lowest cost and finds out if everyone gets equally good care. Diversity and inclusion research focuses on whether all marginalized and minoritized populations (such as a given social standing, race, ethnicity, sex, gender identity, sexuality, age, income, disability status, language, culture, faith, geographic location, or country of birth) receive equitable care. This includes checking whether different populations are all getting the care they need and looking for ways to improve the care. Implementation science studies how to make a potential improvement work in the real world. The improvement could be a new way to diagnose or treat a health condition, a better way to deliver health care or do research, or a strategy to remove barriers preventing specific populations from getting the best available care. The National Hemophilia Foundation focuses on improving the lives of all people with bleeding disorders (BD). They brought BDs doctors, nurses, physical therapists, social workers, professors, and government and industry partners together with people and families living with BDs to discuss research in the areas described above. The group came up with important future research questions to address racism and other biases, and other changes to policies, procedures, and practices to make BD care equitable, efficient, and effective.

Building the foundation for a community-generated national research blueprint for inherited bleeding disorders: research to advance the health of people with inherited bleeding disorders with the potential to menstruate.

BACKGROUND: People who have or had the potential to menstruate (PPM) with inherited bleeding disorders (BD) face particular challenges receiving appropriate diagnosis and care and participating in research. As part of an initiative to create a National Research Blueprint for future decades of research, the National Hemophilia Foundation (NHF) and American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network conducted extensive all-stakeholder consultations to identify the priorities of PPM with inherited BDs and those who care for them. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Working group (WG) 4 of the NHF State of the Science Research Summit distilled community-identified priorities for PPM with inherited BDs into concrete research questions and scored their feasibility, impact, and risk. RESULTS: WG4 identified important gaps in the foundational knowledge upon which to base optimal diagnosis and care for PPM with inherited BDs. They defined 44 top-priority research questions concerning lifespan sex biology, pregnancy and the post-partum context, uterine physiology and bleeding, bone and joint health, health care delivery, and patient-reported outcomes and quality-of-life. CONCLUSIONS: The needs of PPM will best be advanced with research designed across the spectrum of sex and gender biology, with methodologies and outcome measures tailored to this population, involving them throughout.

Up to 1% of cisgender women and girls have an inherited bleeding disorder (BD). Common symptoms include heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB), heavy bleeding after giving birth known as post-partum hemorrhage (PPH), nose bleeds, bleeding from the mouth, and excessive bleeding after surgery or procedures. They can also experience bleeding into their muscles, joints, and even into the brain. Uterine bleeding, such as from HMB and PPH, can impact the lives of anyone who has or had a uterus, a group we designate as people who have or had the potential to menstruate (PPM).Many PPM with an inherited BD do not receive diagnosis, treatment, and care needed due to a lack of expertise among health care professionals and the public, misunderstanding, and bias. Uncertainty about "normal" versus "abnormal" bleeding can contribute to a lack of diagnosis, treatment, and care. Language, such as the label of "carrier," can be a barrier to accessing treatment and care for PPM.People with inherited BDs, health care professionals with various expertise and focus, and researchers worked together to identify the research that would most improve the lives of PPM, in six focus areas where there are major gaps in knowledge and the lack of standards required for accurate diagnosis.

Patient-centered pharmacovigilance: priority actions from the inherited bleeding disorders community.

Pharmacovigilance, the science and practice of monitoring the effects of medicinals and their safety, is the responsibility of all stakeholders involved in the development, manufacture, regulation, distribution, prescription, and use of drugs and devices. The patient is the stakeholder most impacted by and the greatest source of information on safety issues. It is rare, however, for the patient to take a central role and exert leadership in the design and execution of pharmacovigilance. Patient organizations in the inherited bleeding disorders community are among the most established and empowered, particularly in the rare disorders. In this review, two of the largest bleeding disorders patient organizations, Hemophilia Federation of America (HFA) and National Hemophilia Foundation (NHF), offer insights into the priority actions required of all stakeholders to improve pharmacovigilance. The recent and ongoing increase in incidents raising safety concerns and a therapeutic landscape on the cusp of unprecedented expansion heighten the urgency of a recommitment to the primacy of patient safety and well-being in drug development and distribution. Plain Language Summary: Patients at the center of product safety Every medical device and therapeutic product has potential benefits and harms. The pharmaceutical and biomedical companies that develop them must demonstrate that they are effective, and the safety risks are limited or manageable, for regulators to approve them for use and sale. After the product has been approved and people are using it in their daily lives, it is important to continue to collect information about any negative side effects or adverse events; this is called pharmacovigilance. Regulators, like the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration, the companies that sell and distribute the products, and healthcare professionals who prescribe them are all required to participate in collecting, reporting, analyzing, and communicating this information. The people with the most firsthand knowledge of the benefits and harms of the drug or device are the patients who use them. They have an important responsibility to learn how to recognize adverse events, how to report them, and to stay informed of any news about the product from the other partners in the pharmacovigilance network. Those partners have a crucial responsibility to provide clear, easy-to-understand information to patients about any new safety concerns that come to light. The community of people with inherited bleeding disorders has recently encountered problems with poor communication of product safety issues, prompting two large US patient organizations, National Hemophilia Foundation and Hemophilia Federation of America, to hold a Safety Summit with all the pharmacovigilance network partners. Together they developed recommendations to improve the collection and communication of information about product safety so that patients can make well-informed, timely decisions about their use of drugs and devices. This article presents these recommendations in the context of how pharmacovigilance is supposed to work and some of the challenges encountered by the community.