ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine the correlation between the prognosis of patients admitted to a tertiary intensive care unit (ICU) and the admitted patient population, intensive care conditions, and the workload of intensive care staff. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study that analyzed data from all tertiary ICUs (a minimum of 40 and a maximum of 59 units per month) of eight training and research hospitals between January 2022 and May 2023. We compared monthly data across hospitals and analyzed factors associated with patient prognosis, including mortality and pressure injuries (PIs). RESULTS: This study analyzed data from 54,312 patients, of whom 51% were male and 58.8% were aged 65 or older. The median age was 69 years. The average number of tertiary ICU beds per unit was 15 ± 6 beds, and the average occupancy rate was 83.57 ± 19.28%. On average, 7 ± 9 pressure injuries (PI) and 10 ± 7 patient deaths per unit per month were reported. The mortality rate (18.66%) determined per unit was similar to the expected rate (15-25%) according to the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score. There was a statistically significant difference among hospitals on a monthly basis across various aspects, including bed occupancy rate, length of stay (LOS), number of patients per ICU bed, number of patients per nurse in a shift, rate of patients developing PI, hospitalization rate from the emergency department, hospitalization rate from wards, hospitalization rate from the external center, referral rate, and mortality rate (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although generally reliable in predicting prognosis in tertiary ICUs, the APACHE II scoring system may have limitations when analyzed on a unit-specific basis. ICU-related conditions have an impact on patient prognosis. ICU occupancy rate, work intensity, patient population, and number of working nurses are important factors associated with ICU mortality. In particular, data on the patient population admitted to the unit (emergency patients and patients with a history of malignancy) were most strongly associated with unit mortality.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Family members of intensive care unit (ICU) patients are sometimes highly distressed and report lower satisfaction with communication and emotional support from staff. Within a study of emotional responses to traumatic stress, associations between family distress and satisfaction with aspects of ICU care were investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 29 family members of trauma patients who stayed in an ICU, we assessed symptoms of depression and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) during ICU care. Later, family members rated staff communication, support, and skills and their overall satisfaction with ICU care. RESULTS: Ratings of staff competence and skills were significantly higher than ratings of frequency of communication, information needs being met, and support. Frequency of communication and information needs being met were strongly related to ratings of support (rs = .75-.77) and staff skills (rs = .77-.85), and aspects of satisfaction and communication showed negative relationships with symptoms of depression (rs = -.31 to -.55) and PTSD (rs = -.17 to -.43). CONCLUSIONS: Although satisfaction was fairly high, family member distress was negatively associated with several satisfaction variables. Increased understanding of the effects of traumatic stress on family members may help staff improve communication and increase satisfaction of highly distressed family members.
Subject(s)
Communication , Empathy , Family/psychology , Intensive Care Units , Professional-Family Relations , Adult , Counseling , Critical Care , Depression/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Perception , Personal Satisfaction , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosis , Stress, Psychological/diagnosisABSTRACT
Objetivo: Este estudo teve como objetivo determinar a política de visitação predominante nas unidades de terapia intensiva e quais comodidades proporcionadas aos visitantes. Métodos: Foram enviados 800 convites a endereços de e-mail de médicos e enfermeiros intensivistas listados nos grupos de pesquisa da Rede da Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira e da Rede Brasileira de Pesquisa em Terapia Intensiva. A mensagem por e-mail continha um link para um questionário de 33 itens a respeito do perfil de suas respectivas unidades de terapia intensiva. Resultados: Foram incluídos no estudo os questionários de 162 unidades de terapia intensiva localizadas em todas as regiões do país, mas foram predominantes as das Regiões Sudeste (58%) e Sul (16%). Apenas 2,6% das unidades de terapia intensiva relataram ter políticas liberais de visitação, enquanto 45,1% das unidades de terapia intensiva possibilitavam dois períodos diários de visitação e 69,1% permitiam de 31 a 60 minutos de visita por período. Em situações especiais, como casos de fim de vida, 98,7% delas permitiam visitas em horários flexíveis. Cerca de metade das unidades de terapia intensiva (50,8%) não oferecia qualquer comodidade aos visitantes. Apenas 46,9% das unidades de terapia intensiva tinham uma sala de reunião com familiares, e 37% não dispunham de uma sala de espera. ...
Objective: This study aimed to determine which visitation policy was the most predominant in Brazilian intensive care units and what amenities were provided to visitors. Methods: Eight hundred invitations were sent to the e-mail addresses of intensivist physicians and nurses who were listed in the research groups of the Brazilian Association of Intensive Care Network and the Brazilian Research in Intensive Care Network. The e-mail contained a link to a 33-item questionnaire about the profile of their intensive care unit. Results: One hundred sixty-two questionnaires from intensive care units located in all regions of the country, but predominantly in the Southeast and South (58% and 16%), were included in the study. Only 2.6% of the intensive care units reported having liberal visitation policies, while 45.1% of the intensive care units allowed 2 visitation periods and 69.1% allowed 31-60 minutes of visitation per period. In special situations, such as end-of-life cases, 98.7% of them allowed flexible visitation. About half of them (50.8%) did not offer any bedside amenities for visitors. Only 46.9% of the intensive care units had a family meeting room, and 37% did not have a waiting room. Conclusion: Restrictive visitation policies are predominant in Brazilian intensive care units, with most of them allowing just two periods of visitation per day. There is also a lack of amenities for visitors. .
