[Toward optimizing AML treatment in the elderly].

Traditionally, the goal of AML therapy has been to induce remission with intensive chemotherapy, reduce tumor volume as much as possible with consolidation therapy, and achieve cure by allogeneic transplantation in patients with a poor prognosis. However, in elderly patients and patients with co-morbidities, toxicity often outweighs the therapeutic benefit of intensive chemotherapy. Now that low-intensity chemotherapy, such as methylation inhibitors and venetoclax, has emerged as a promising treatment option for elderly patients, it is more important than ever to consider age and comorbidities in treatment selection. The recently proposed comorbidity-based risk stratification system for AML enables prognostic stratification in not only patients who received intensive chemotherapy, but also those who received low-intensity chemotherapy. Optimization of treatment intensity based on such risk stratification should improve both treatment efficacy and safety, and ultimately improve the prognosis of AML.

Real-world outcomes of intensive induction approaches in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia.

Core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML) is characterized by the presence of inv(16)/t(16;16) or t(8;21) and is classified as a favorable risk by the 2022 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) guidelines. The CD33-targeting antibody-drug conjugate, gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO), is commonly added to intensive chemotherapy (IC) in CBF-AML. We sought to compare outcomes in patients treated with IC with or without GO in CBF-AML. We included 200 patients with CBF-AML treated with IC across seven academic centers. Induction treatment regimens were categorized as IC alone, IC with GO, or IC with KIT inhibitor (dasatinib or midostaurin). Median follow-up for the whole cohort was 2.5 years. Three-year overall survival (OS) was 70% and 3-year event-free survival (EFS) was 51%. Patients treated with IC with GO experienced a 3-year EFS of 50% compared to those treated with IC alone who experienced a 3-year EFS of 47%, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.62). Similarly, those treated with IC with GO did not experience an improved OS compared to those treated with IC alone (p = 0.67). Patients treated with IC with KIT inhibitor experienced a significantly improved 3-year EFS of 85% compared to those with IC with or without GO (p = 0.04). We find in our study that there is no survival benefit in patients treated with IC with the addition of GO; improved EFS was seen in patients with CBF-AML treated with IC plus KIT inhibitors, consistent with outcomes noted in prospective studies utilizing this approach.

Acute Pancreatitis in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (AcuPA Study): A Nationwide Survey in Poland.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify the risk factors for acute pancreatitis (AP) and its impact on outcomes in Polish children treated for ALL. METHODS: The study group included 2303 children receiving intensive chemotherapy for ALL. The group was divided into patients with at least one episode of AP and those who did not develop AP after treatment for ALL. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of AP in the study group was 4.08%. Older age was an independent risk factor for the development of AP (OR = 1.05; 95%CI = 1.006-1.098; p = 0.03). The overall mortality associated with AP was 2.13%. The probabilities of disease-free survival (p-DFS) and event-free survival (p-EFS) in both subgroups were 0.84 vs. 0.86, log-rank p = 0.65 and 0.75 vs. 0.80, log-rank p = 0.12, respectively. A total of 22 out of 94 patients (23.4%) with AP were re-exposed to asparaginase (ASP) during the subsequent treatment phases. Only one patient re-exposed to ASP (4.5%) developed a second episode of AP. There were no significant differences in p-DFS and p-EFS between patients re-exposed and not re-exposed to asparaginase (0.78 vs. 0.86, log-rank p = 0.27 and 0.63 vs. 0.79, log-rank p = 0.09, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of AP in children with ALL is low and related to patients' age. The development of AP does not seem to influence p-DFS and p-EFS in children with ALL. Recurrence of AP after re-exposure to asparaginase in patients with ALL and a history of AP is low (4.5%). Re-exposure to asparaginase after the first episode of AP does not improve either p-DFS or p-EFS in children with ALL.

Treatment and clinical outcomes of patients with acute myeloid leukemia in Finland 2010-2020: A retrospective analysis of electronic health records.

Our retrospective study (2010-2020) examined treatment patterns, outcomes, and healthcare resource utilization in Finnish acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. Data covered 153 patients diagnosed at Hospital District of Southwest Finland (HDSF) and 107 from other districts who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (aSCT) at HDSF. Of the 153 patients, 56.2% received intensive chemotherapy (IC), while 43.8% deemed ineligible for IC received low-intensity therapies or best supportive care (BSC). Median overall survival for IC patients was 31.2 months, compared to 5.3 months for those under azacytidine and 1.2 months on BSC. Majority (57.5%) of patients over 60 with intermediate/high European leukemia network risk had poor outcomes with IC and couldn't proceed to aSCT. These patients carried the highest costs and hospital resource use per patient month. Most common reasons for transplant ineligibility after IC were refractory disease and infection. Our data provides a comprehensive view on AML treatment landscape from a period when the latest treatment advancements were not yet accessible. The data describes patient groups with poor prognosis and increased healthcare burden, emphasizing the need to improve treatment practices and identify better ways to get more patients to transplant, in a rapidly evolving treatment landscape.

NPM1-mutated myeloid neoplasms are a unique entity not defined by bone marrow blast percentage.

INTRODUCTION: NPM1-mutated (NPM1mut) myeloid neoplasms (MNs) with <20% bone marrow (BM) blasts (NPM1mut MNs<20) are uncommon, and their classification remains inconsistent. METHODS: The clinicopathologic features of 54 patients with NPM1mut MNs <20 were evaluated and compared with wild-type NPM1 MNs <20 and NPM1mut MNs≥20, respectively. RESULTS: NPM1mut MNs had similar features regardless of blast percentage, except for higher IDH2 (29% vs 7%, p = .023) and FLT3 (70% vs 11%, p < .001) frequency in patients with ≥20% BM blasts. Thirty-three (61%) patients with NPM1mut MNs <20 received low-intensity chemotherapy (LIC) and 12 (22%) received intensive chemotherapy (IC). Higher complete remission rates (75% vs 27%, p = .006) and median overall survival (mOS) (not reached vs 30.4 months, p = .06) were observed with IC compared to LIC. Young patients (age <60 years) did not reach mOS either when treated with LIC or IC. Stem cell transplant was associated with increased survival only in patients treated with LIC (HR, 0.24; p = .025). No differences in mOS were observed by BM blast strata (32.2 months, not reached and 46.9 months for <10%, 10%-19%, and ≥20% blasts, p = .700) regardless of treatment modality (LIC: p = .900; IC: p = .360). Twenty-three patients (43%) with NPM1mut MNs <20 had marrow blast progression to ≥20%. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, NPM1mut MNs define a unique entity independent of BM blast percentage.

Intensive salvage chemotherapy with VDTPACE or mCBAD followed by hematopoietic stem-cell support for refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma.

INTRODUCTION: Triple- and quad-refractory multiple myeloma patients usually have an aggressive course and a poor prognosis. Available therapeutic options are scarce. METHODS: The objective of the current study was to evaluate responses and toxicities of VDTPACE or mCBAD with hematopoietic stem-cell support as a bridge to subsequent therapies in patients with refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were included (11 mCBAD, 2 VDTPACE), and 21 cycles of chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell support were delivered. Mean number of previous therapies was 4.8. Stem cells were infused on a median day 9.9 after chemotherapy. Mean time to neutrophil recovery was 18.2 days in patients receiving the first cycle and 15.9 following subsequent cycles. Before therapy, most patients were in PD (77%), PR (15%), or VGPR (8%). Following treatment, the best responses achieved were PR (46%), VGPR (46%), and CR (8%). Median overall and progression-free survivals were 17 and 9 months. There has been no case of non-relapse mortality. In the 21 cycles, the main complications were infectious. CONCLUSION: Intensive chemotherapy can decrease disease burden in patients with relapsed/refractory MM, and stem-cell support can successfully decrease toxicities and treatment-related mortality associated with these regimens and may be a good bridging option.

Evaluation of Posaconazole Serum Concentrations Achieved With Delayed-release Tablets and Oral Suspension in Patients Undergoing Intensive Chemotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome.

Data on posaconazole serum levels of patients on prophylaxis with delayed-release tablets or oral suspension during intensive chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome are scarce. In this analysis, the proportion of patients with acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome achieving posaconazole target concentrations with delayed-release tablets was higher than with oral suspension.

Is intensive chemotherapy and allogeneic stem cell transplantation mandatory for curing Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia in young patients in the era of multitarget agents?

INTRODUCTION: The treatment outcomes for Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ALL) have improved with various tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and bispecific T-cell engagers. Although allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is the standard treatment for young patients with Ph+ALL, its role remains debatable in the era of TKIs and blinatumomab. AREAS COVERED: There are some issues regarding Ph+ALL. First, do young patients require intensive chemotherapy (IC) in the era of multitarget agents? Second, which TKI is preferred for frontline therapy? Third, should allo-SCT be performed in patients achieving complete remission with ponatinib and IC? Fourth, can chemo-free treatment lead to a cure without allo-SCT? We searched relevant literature from the last 30 years on PubMed; reviewed the role of chemo-free therapies and combinations of ponatinib and IC; and assessed the necessity of allo-SCT in young patients with Ph+ALL. EXPERT OPINION: Allo-SCT may not be needed, even in young patients with Ph+ALL treated with ponatinib-based IC or combined ponatinib and blinatumomab as frontline therapy. When adopting a ponatinib-based chemo-minimized regimen for induction, allo-SCT is needed with posttransplant ponatinib maintenance. Continuous exposure to ponatinib at pre- or post-transplant is regarded as one of the most important factor for the success of treatment.

[The Efficacy and Safety of Venetoclax Combined with Azacitidine in the Treatment of Adult Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Unfit for Intensive Chemotherapy].

OBJECTIVE: To observe the clinical efficacy and safety of venetoclax (VEN) combined with azacitidine (AZA) in the treatment of adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who are unfit for intensive chemotherapy. METHODS: The clinical data of 21 adult patients with unfit AML who were treated with VEN combined with AZA in the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from January 2021 to May 2022 were collected, and the efficacy and safety were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: After one course of treatment with VEN and AZA, 16 out of 21 unfit AML patients reached complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), 2 patients reached partial remission (PR), the overall response rate (ORR) was 85.7%. Among the 16 patients with CR/CRi, 13 achieved minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity. Among the 11 patients with adverse prognosis, 8 achieved CR/CRi. By the deadline of follow-up, the median overall suivival (OS) of the entire cohort was not reached, with 1-year OS rate of 61.7%. The main adverse events of VEN combined with AZA were myelosuppression, gastrointestinal reactions and infections. There were 13 cases of leukopenia, 7 cases of neutropenia, 7 cases of anemia, 4 cases of thrombocytopenia, and these hematologic adverse events were all grade 3-4. There were 11 cases with gastrointestinal reactions and 7 cases with infections. The above adverse events were controllable and tolerable. No tumor lysis syndrome or infection related death occurred. CONCLUSION: VEN combined with AZA can quickly achieve deep remission in adult patients with unfit AML, and it shows a good safety profile.

Addition of single dose gemtuzumab ozogamicin to intensive induction chemotherapy in core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia.

In a meta-analysis of 5 trials, the addition of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) to intensive induction chemotherapy led to a survival benefit in patients with core-binding factor (CBF) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Given the heterogeneous incorporation of GO in clinical trials, the ideal dose and schedule remains unclear. We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis to compare outcomes of patients with CBF-AML treated with intensive induction chemotherapy, with or without a single dose of GO 3 mg/m2, during induction only. We included 87 patients (GO=32, control=55). The composite complete remission (cCR) rate was higher in the control group (93%) compared to the GO group (82%) (p<0.001). The rate of measurable residual disease (MRD) negative cCR, by flow cytometry, was similar between both groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of toxicity. The 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS) for both groups was similar (71% vs 68%, p=0.5). The 3-year overall survival (OS) for the GO group was 68%, compared to 66% for the control group (p=0.9).In multivariable analysis, age and MRD positive status were risk factors for inferior outcomes. We find that survival of patients with CBF-AML is favorable in the real-world setting. The addition of single-dose GO, during induction, did not lead to a higher remission rate or survival benefit, when compared to intensive chemotherapy without GO. Further investigation into the incorporation of GO in the treatment algorithm for CBF-AML is needed.

Dismal outcome of refractory or relapsing patients with myelodysplasia-related acute myeloid leukemia partially alleviated by intensive chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with myelodysplasia-related characteristics is a heterogeneous subset of AML that has been challenged throughout the history of myeloid malignancies classifications, considered to have similar outcomes as intermediate- or adverse-risk AML depending on the subgroup. However, little is known about the fate of these patients in refractory or relapsed situation (R/R) after first line therapy. METHODS: A large series of R/R AML patients, recorded in the French DATAML registry, have received either intensive chemotherapy (ICT), azacitidine (AZA) as single agent, or best supportive care (BSC). A cohort of 183 patients (median age 63-year-old) with what was called at the time AML-MRC has been explored, and data are reported here. RESULTS: Patient status was refractory for 93, while 90 had relapsed. Respectively, 88, 34, and 61 were included in the three treatment arms. The median OS of the whole cohort was 4.2 months (95%CI: 3.1-5.6) with a mean 1-year overall survival of 24% ± 3.2%. There was no significant survival difference between refractory and relapsed patients. The BSC group had overall a significantly worse outcome (p = 0.0001), and this remained true in both refractory (p = 0.01) and relapsed (p = 0.002) patients. Similar survivals were observed in both groups comparing ICT and AZA. CONCLUSIONS: These data, reporting about an ill-explored population, indicate the poor prognosis of this condition where both ICT and AZA can be proposed. The latter, which was demonstrated here to be a feasible option, should be added to new targeted therapies.

Poor Outcome of Adult T-Cell Leukemia/Lymphoma with Current Available Therapy: An Experience of Two Centers.

INTRODUCTION: Adult T-cell leukemia lymphoma (ATLL) is an aggressive mature T-cell neoplasm caused by human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) infection. Despite its poor prognosis, there is no standard therapy for ATLL due to its low incidence and the disease affecting only endemic geographical clusters. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of patients with the diagnosis of ATLL at Moffitt Cancer Center and Memorial Healthcare System was done to identify patients and disease characteristics along with the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for the different therapies used. RESULTS: The 61 patients analyzed showed a median age of 58 with 82.5% of them being of African American descent. The acute variant contributed to the majority of cases (43.9%), followed by 36.8% presenting as a lymphoma variant. There was no statistical difference in the PFS (6.4 m, 3.1 m, 2.1 m; p = 0.23) or OS (14 m, 8.9 m, 18.5 m; p = 0.14) between cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP), intensive chemotherapy regimens, and other modalities, respectively. However, the patients who had complete or partial remission with first-line therapy had better OS (15.9 m vs. 7.2 m; p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The study highlighted the poor outcome of the current regimens and the lack of a unifying protocol for this vicious disease. The acute variants were treated with more intensive regimens, but there was no difference in the OS between the three major options of CHOP, intensified chemotherapy, and others. This underscores the need for more clinical trials to develop better outcomes.

Assessing the impact of prophylactic anidulafungin during remission induction of acute myeloid leukemia - A propensity-score matching analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Invasive fungal infection (IFI) accounts for substantial morbidity during the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in adults. Antifungal prophylaxis (AP) is needed during intensive chemotherapy, and posaconazole is not widely available. In this study, we aimed to examine the impact of prophylactic anidulafungin during intensive AML remission induction. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort encompassing newly diagnosed AML adult patients. All subjects received intensive chemotherapy and were divided into three groups: patients who did not receive any AP and patients who received fluconazole (150-400 mg/day) or anidulafungin (100 mg/day). RESULTS: During AML induction, 82 patients did not receive AP, 108 and 14 patients received anidulafungin and fluconazole, respectively. IFI incidence was 27%, classified as possible, probable, and proven in 65, 2 and 33%, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that lower neutrophil counts are associated with IFI (OR = 2.8), whereas age, genetic classification, and lymphocyte counts were not. To examine the impact of anidulafungin in comparison with 'no AP', a propensity score matching analysis was performed. Use of anidulafungin was not related to less IFI during induction, while neutrophil counts remained significant. Patients under prophylactic anidulafungin received less amphotericin B (p < 0.001) but not voriconazole (p = 0.49). DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study addressing the role of anidulafungin during AML induction. Here, the incidence of mold infections did not decrease with AP, suggesting that in a setting with a high incidence of IFI, broad spectrum AP might be more suitable.

A Survival Analysis of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients Treated With Intensive Chemotherapy: A Single Center Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is a haematological disease associated with a dismal prognosis, despite major progress made in recent years in terms of antileukemic agents and supportive care. METHODS: We investigated the results of the intensive treatment of 133 fit AML patients (de novo and secondary) from a referral cancer centre in Romania, treated between January 2015 and December 2021. RESULTS: We included 79 male and 54 female patients with a median age of 53 years (range 18-70). Molecular biology analysis was available for 82.7% of patients, whereas karyotype analysis was only available for 33% of patients. The median overall survival (OS) was 8.7 months, and the disease-free survival rate was 26.3% at a median follow-up of 33.7 months. The complete remission (CR) rate after induction was 48.9% for all patients and 61.9% for patients who were assessable (excluding patients who died before being assessed for response). Twelve patients underwent allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT), with the median OS not reached. Early mortality (EM), defined as death during the first 30 days after admission, was 17.3%, with the main cause of death being septic shock (78.3%). Elderly patients (≥60 years of age) had a lower OS, more primary refractory disease, and higher rates of early mortality. CONCLUSION: Complete remission rates and OS in our cohort were lower than in other reports. Early mortality was unexpectedly high, mainly due to infections, which were the main causes of death in our cohort.

Outcomes and survival predictors of Latin American older adults with acute myeloid leukemia: Data from a single center

ABSTRACT Introduction: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is most commonly presented in older adults; however, it appears 10 years earlier in Latin American countries. Clinical evolution in older adults from this populations has not been characterized. We analyzed outcomes and survival predictors. Methods: Patients ≥ 55 years old diagnosed with AML at a hematology referral center from 2005 to 2020 receiving intensive chemotherapy (IC), low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) and best supportive care (BSC) were included. Survival analysis included the Kaplan-Meier and Cox models and the cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR). Results: Seventy-five adults were included and the overall survival (OS) was 4.87, 1.67 and 1.16 months, using IC, LDAC and BSC, respectively. The IC led to a higher OS (p < 0.001) and was a protective factor for early death, at a cost of more days spent hospitalized and more non-fatal treatment complications; non-significant differences were found between the LDAC and BSC. Eight (10.7%) patients underwent hematopoietic cell transplantation, with a higher OS (p = 0.013). Twenty (26.7%) patients achieved complete remission; 12 (60%) relapsed with a 6-month CIR of 57.9% in those < 70 years old vs. 86.5% in those ≥ 70 years old, p = 0.034. Multivariate analysis showed the white blood cell count (WBC) and IC had a significant impact on the patient survival, whereas chronological age and the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) did not. Conclusion: AML in low-middle income countries demands a different approach; the IC improves survival, even with a high incidence of relapse, and should be offered as first-line treatment. Eligibility criteria should include WBC and a multidimensional evaluation. The age per se and the CCI should not be exclusion criteria to consider IC.

Therapies for acute myeloid leukemia in patients ineligible for standard induction chemotherapy: a systematic review.

Aim: To review clinical evidence for current and emerging treatments for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are ineligible for first-line induction chemotherapy. Methods: A systematic literature review was performed (28 October 2021) to identify clinical outcomes including overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), relapse-free survival (RFS) and adverse events (AEs). Results: Of 233 references that met prespecified criteria, 26 studies were included. Adding targeted therapies (venetoclax/ivosidenib) to hypomethylating agents (HMAs) yielded better OS hazard ratios (HRs) (0.44-0.66) and EFS HRs (0.33-0.63) compared with other agents. AEs were more frequent with combination therapies than control arms, except with ivosidenib plus azacitidine. Conclusion: Targeted therapy combined with a HMA shows the most promising results in this difficult-to-treat population.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a type of cancer of the bone marrow and blood that leads to overproduction of immature white blood cells. High-dose (intensive) chemotherapy is usually the first treatment option for AML. However, more than half of people newly diagnosed with AML cannot receive the recommended initial intensive chemotherapy due to older age or poor health. Treatment with low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) and hypomethylating agents (HMAs), such as azacitidine, is key for such people. We reviewed 26 clinical trials looking into available and developing treatment options for people who cannot have the recommended initial chemotherapy. The review found evidence that combining LDAC or HMA with a targeted therapy can improve survival. In AML, new therapies (such as ivosidenib, venetoclax and glasdegib) 'target' specific changes in the genes of cancer cells to slow or stop their division and growth. The greatest improvement in survival was seen in clinical trials where targeted therapies were added to azacitidine or LDAC. Targeted therapies may result in certain side effects that require regular monitoring. To provide patients with the benefits of targeted therapies they need to undergo genetic testing at the time of diagnosis. Tests to determine an individual's specific gene changes allows clinicians to develop personalised treatment plans with available targeted therapies. This shows promise in improving survival for people with AML who cannot receive initial intensive chemotherapy.

Treatment of acute myeloid leukaemia in older patients - scope of intensive therapy? - A retrospective analysis.

PURPOSE: Therapeutic regimens and outcome of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) patients substantially improved over the past decades. However, AML in older patients is still widely understudied and therapeutic standards are far less well defined. This study provides a retrospective analysis of a cohort of AML patients above 65 years of age treated at a single university centre in Germany. METHODS: Treatment regimens including intensive chemotherapy with or without subsequent allogenic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT), hypomethylating agent (HMA) or low-dose cytarabine (LD-AraC) based therapy or best supportive care (BSC) were evaluated and compared to patient-specific variables, comorbidities indices such as Haematopoietic Cell Transplantation-specific Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) or Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status to assess their potential impact on outcome. RESULTS: 229 patients ≥ 65 years with newly diagnosed AML were included in this study. Patients received either intensive chemotherapy (IT) without (n = 101, 44%), or followed by allo-SCT (n = 27, 12%), HMA (n = 29, 13%), LD-Ara-C (n = 16, 7%) or best supportive care (BSC) only (n = 56, 24%). Of interest, ECOG performance status predicted overall survival in patients treated with IT, and combinatorial assessment of ECOG and HCT-CI was particularly useful to predict outcome in this subgroup of patients. CONCLUSION: Subsets of AML patients above 65 years of age benefit from intensive chemotherapy and allogenic stem cell transplantation. Combined assessment of ECOG scores and HCT-CI might help to objectively identify suitable patients, and this concept should be further investigated in a prospective manner in future studies.

Selected subsets of AML patients may profit from intensive chemotherapy and allogenic stem cell transplantation.Combined analysis of ECOG performance status and HCT-CI might help to predict outcome in elderly AML patients.

Clinical outcomes after CPX-351 in patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia: A comparison with a matched cohort from the Spanish PETHEMA registry.

BACKGROUND: CPX-351 is approved for the treatment of therapy related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML) and AML with myelodysplastic related changes (MRC-AML). The benefits of this treatment over standard chemotherapy has not been addressed in well matched cohorts of real-life patients. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of AML patients treated with CPX-351 as per routine practice. A propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare their main outcomes with those observed in a matched cohort among 765 historical patients receiving intensive chemotherapy (IC), all of them reported to the PETHEMA epidemiologic registry. RESULTS: Median age of 79 patients treated with CPX-351 was 67 years old (interquartile range 62-71), 53 were MRC-AML. The complete remission (CR) rate or CR without recovery (CRi) after 1 or 2 cycles of CPX-351 was 52%, 60-days mortality 18%, measurable residual disease <0.1% in 54% (12 out of 22) of them. Stem cell transplant (SCT) was performed in 27 patients (34%), median OS was 10.3 months, and 3-year relapse incidence was 50%. Using PSM, we obtained two comparable cohorts treated with CPX-351 (n = 52) or IC (n = 99), without significant differences in CR/CRi (60% vs. 54%) and median OS (10.3 months vs. 9.1 months), although more patients were bridged to SCT in the CPX-351 group (35% vs. 12%). The results were confirmed when only 3 + 7 patients were included in the historical cohort. In multivariable analyses, SCT was associated with better OS (HR 0.33 95% CI: 0.18-0.59), p < 0.001. CONCLUSION: Larger post-authorization studies may provide evidence of the clinical benefits of CPX-351 for AML in the real-life setting.