Neuropathic pain after surgery - A clinical validation study and assessment of accuracy measures of the 5-item NeuPPS scale.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to validate the Neuropathic Pain for Post-Surgical Patients (NeuPPS) scale against clinically verified neuropathic pain (NP) by quantitative sensory testing (QST) as well as evaluation of other psychometric properties. The NeuPPS is a validated 5-item scale designed to evaluate NP in surgical populations. METHODS: Data from 537 women aged >18 years scheduled for primary breast cancer surgery enrolled in a previous study for assessing risk factors for persistent pain after breast cancer treatment were used. Exclusion criteria were any other breast surgery or relevant comorbidity. A total of 448 eligible questionnaires were available at 6 months and 455 at 12 months. At 12 months, 290 patients completed a clinical examination and QST. NeuPPS and PainDETECT were analyzed against patients with and without clinically verified NP. NP was assessed using a standardized QST protocol including a clinical assessment. Furthermore, the NeuPPS and PainDETECT scores were psychometrically tested with an item response theory method, the Rasch analysis, to assess construct validity. Primary outcomes were the diagnostic accuracy measures for the NeuPPS, and secondary measures were psychometric analyses of the NeuPPS after 6 and 12 months. PainDETECT was also compared to clinically verified NP as well as NeuPPS comparing the stability of the estimates. RESULTS: Comparing the NeuPPS scores with verified NP using a receiver operating characteristic curve, the NeuPPS had an area under the curve of 0.80. Using a cutoff of 1, the NeuPPS had a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 59%, and using a cutoff of 3, the values were 35 and 96%, respectively. Analysis of the PainDETECT indicated that the used cutoffs may be inappropriate in a surgical population. CONCLUSION: The present study supports the validity of the NeuPPS as a screening tool for NP in a surgical population.

Preservation versus dissection of the intercostobrachial nerve for breast cancer surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction: This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of preservation of the intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN) versus its dissection for patients who underwent breast surgery. Methods: The authors searched Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Scopus from inception until March 2023. Records were screened for eligible studies, and all relevant outcomes were pooled as an odds ratio (OR) with the corresponding 95% CI in the meta-analysis models using RevMan version 5.4. Results: These results from 11 studies (1021 patients) favored preservation of the ICBN over its dissection in terms of anaesthesia and hypaesthesia [OR 0.50, (95% CI, 0.31-0.82); P = 0.006] and [OR 0.33, (95% CI, 0.16-0.68); P = 0.003], respectively. Whereas the overall effect favored ICBN dissection over preservation in the case of hyperaesthesia [OR 4.34, (95% CI, 1.43-13.15); P = 0.01]. Conversely, no significant variance was detected between the two groups in terms of pain [OR 0.68, (95% CI, 0.28-1.61) P = 0.38], paraesthesia [OR 0.88, (95% CI, 0.49-1.60); P = 0.68], and analgesia [OR 1.46, (95% CI, 0.05-45.69); P = 0.83]. Conclusion: This meta-analysis revealed that the preservation of the ICBN has a significant effect on the disturbance of sensory parameters of hypaesthesia and anaesthesia when compared to its dissection. Further studies with larger sample sizes are recommended to precisely compare both techniques on a wider range of parameters.

Postmastectomy Pain Syndrome: A Narrative Review.

Postmastectomy pain syndrome is a very common disorder in breast cancer survivors. The impact on the quality of patients' lives is significantly adverse. The precise pathophysiology has not been determined as yet though various risk factors have been identified that make the patient vulnerable. Required preoperative work includes the identification and possible elimination of risk factors. Treatment is multidisciplinary involving surgical and non-surgical modalities. There is a great scope of research in this field.

Blockade of intercostobrachial nerve by an erector spinae plane block at T2 level: a case report.

BACKGROUND: The intercostobrachial nerve blockade is required, in addition to brachial plexus block, to anesthetize the entire upper arm. No studies have described the use of erector spinae plane (ESP) block for an intercostobrachial nerve block. CASE PRESENTATION: A 72-year-old man was scheduled to undergo left brachial vein transposition-arteriovenous fistula creation for hemodialysis access. An ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block was performed using a mixture of 0.5% levobupivacaine (12.5 ml) and 2% lidocaine (12.5 ml). An ESP block was implemented using 10 ml of the same local anesthetic at the T2 level. A pinprick test showed that the entire upper arm and lateral aspect of the left upper chest wall were anesthetized 20 min after the blocks. Surgery was successfully performed without the need for general anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: In the present case, an ESP block performed at the T2 level provided sensory loss of the area innervated by the intercostobrachial nerve.

Comparison of the Effect of Intercostobrachial Nerve Block with and Without Ultrasound Guidance on Tourniquet Pain After Axillary Block of Brachial Plexus: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Background: A tourniquet is used to control bleeding in the surgical field. Because part of the inner arm is innervated by the intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN), a tourniquet can cause intolerable pain. Objectives: The present study aimed to compare the effect of ICBN block with and without ultrasound (US) guidance on tourniquet pain after axillary block. Methods: This study was performed on 60 patients who were candidates for surgery. The patients were divided into 3 groups: the control group (n = 22), the traditional ICBN (TICBN) blockade group (n = 19), and the US-guided ICBN blockade group (n = 19). After the intervention, the duration of the onset and intensity of pain was recorded for all patients according to the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Data analysis was performed using SPSS. Results: No significant differences were observed in demographic variables between the 3 groups (P > 0.05). The pain intensity in the TICBN blockade (P = 0.001) and US-guided ICBN blockade (P = 0.001) groups was significantly less than in the control group. The mean duration of pain onset was significantly higher in the TICBN blockade (P = 0.021) and US-guided ICBN blockade (P = 0.013) groups than in the control group. No significant difference was observed in the mean of pain intensity (P = 0.48) and the mean duration of pain onset (P = 0.44) between the US-guided ICBN blockade and TICBN blockade groups. Conclusions: The pain caused by a tourniquet can be managed by ICBN block during hand and forearm surgery. It is recommended to use US guidance for more success and safety.

From Cadaveric Dissection to the Operating Room: A Unilateral Double Intercostobrachial Nerve and the Implications in Axillary Lymph Node Dissection.

There are multiple treatment options for breast cancer (BC), including lumpectomy, chemo- and radiotherapy, complete mastectomy, and, when indicated, an axillary lymph node dissection. Such node dissections commonly lead the surgeon to encounter the intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN), which, if injured, leads to significant postoperative numbness of the upper arm. To assist in identifying the ICBN, we report a unilateral variation of a dual ICBN. The first ICBN (ICBN I) originates from the second intercostal space, as classically described in human anatomy. On the contrary, the second ICBN (ICBN II) originates from the second and third intercostal spaces. The anatomical knowledge of ICBN origin and its variations are crucial for axillary lymph node dissection in BC and other surgical interventions that involve the axillary region (e.g., regional nerve blocks). An iatrogenic injury of the ICBN has been associated with postoperative pain, paresthesia, and loss of upper extremity sensation in the dermatome supplied by this nerve. Therefore, maintaining the integrity of the ICBN is a worthy goal during axillary dissections in BC patients. Increasing the awareness of ICBN variants among surgeons reduces potential injuries, which would contribute to the BC patient's quality of life.

An uncommon, unilateral motor variation of the intercostobrachial nerve.

The intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN) is commonly defined as a purely sensory nerve supplying the skin of the lateral chest wall, axilla, and medial arm. However, numerous branching patterns and distributions, including motor, have been reported. This report describes an uncommon variant of the right ICBN observed in both an 86-year-old white female cadaver and a 77-year-old white male cadaver. In both cases the ICBN presented with an additional muscular branch, termed the "medial pectoral branch", piercing and therefore innervating the pectoralis major and minor muscles. Clinically, the ICBN is relevant during surgical access to the axilla and can result in sensory deficits (persistent pain/loss of sensory function) to this region following injury. However, damage to the variation observed in these cadavers may result in additional partial motor loss to pectoralis major and minor.

Sensory Changes and Postmastectomy Pain Following Preservation of Intercostobrachial Nerve in Breast Cancer Surgery: a Prospective Randomized Study.

Surgery for breast cancer leads to sensory changes and persistent pain in about 20-60% of patients and is usually attributed to section of the intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN). However, the opinion is divided about the benefit of preservation of ICBN. Hence, this study was designed to assess the role of preservation of ICBN on sensory changes and acute and persistent pain following mastectomy. The study was conducted on patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer. At the time of surgery, ICBN was sacrificed in group I (N = 29), and preserved in group II (N = 24). Patients underwent sensory assessment for touch and pain in predefined areas after surgery. They were also assessed for acute post-operative pain and persistent pain (PP) on day 30 and 90 by numeric pain rating scale. PP was also evaluated by douleur neuropathique 4 questionnaire for assessment of its neuropathic character. Preservation of ICBN resulted in significantly better preserved sensation on lateral aspect of mastectomy incision, axilla, and medial aspect of the arm. Frequency and severity of acute post-operative pain were similar between the two groups. However, PP was significantly reduced in ICBN preserved group. At 3 months, 31% patients in group I and 12.5% in group II had clinically significant pain (p = 0.024). DN 4 assessment showed neuropathic character of pain in 20.6% and 8.33% in group I and II respectively. In our study, preservation of ICBN resulted in reduced rates of sensory loss and persistent neuropathic pain.

The most commonly injured nerves at surgery: A comprehensive review.

Iatrogenic nerve injury during surgery is a major source of concern for both patients and surgeons. This study aimed to identify the nerves most commonly injured during surgery, along with the commonly associated operative procedures. A literature search was conducted using the PubMed database to identify nerves commonly injured during surgery, along with the surgical procedure associated with the injury. The following 11 nerves, ranked in order with their associated surgical procedures, were found to be the most commonly injured: (a) intercostobrachial nerve in axillary lymph node dissections and transaxillary breast augmentations, (b) vestibulocochlear nerve in cerebellopontine tumor resections and vestibular schwannoma removals, c) facial nerve in surgeries of the inner ear and cheek region, (d) long thoracic nerve in axillary lymph node dissections, (e) spinal accessory nerve in surgeries of the posterior triangle of the neck and cervical lymph node biopsies, (f) recurrent laryngeal nerve in thyroid surgeries, (g) genitofemoral nerve in inguinal hernia and varicocele surgeries, (h) sciatic nerve in acetabular fracture repairs and osteotomies, (i) median nerve in carpal tunnel release surgeries, (j) common fibular nerve in varicose vein and short saphenous vein surgeries, and (k) ulnar nerve in supracondylar fracture surgeries. Although the root cause of iatrogenic nerve injury differs for each nerve, there are four unifying factors that could potentially decrease this risk for all peripheral nerves. These four influencing factors include knowledge of potential anatomical variations, visual identification of at-risk nerves during the procedure, intraoperative nerve monitoring, and expertise of the surgeon.

Modified radical mastectomy for anterior thoracic nerve and intercostobrachial nerve protection (case report).

Modified breast cancer radical mastectomy is a more common operating method in breast surgery. Traditional modified radical mastectomy focuses on protecting the long thoracic nerve and thoracodorsal nerve while ignoring the protection of the anterior thoracic nerve and intercostobrachial nerve protection, which leads often to patients with upper medial arm numbness, acid swelling, pain, chest atrophy, and other problems. In the modified radical mastectomy of breast cancer, in this case, the author used an elaborative operation to protect the anterior thoracic nerve and intercostobrachial nerve and thoroughly dissected the third-level lymph nodes through the axillary approach.

The effectiveness of additional thoracic paravertebral block in improving the anesthetic effects of regional anesthesia for proximal humeral fracture surgery in elderly patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The innervation of the shoulder-upper-extremity area is complicated and unclear. Regional anesthesia with a brachial plexus and cervical plexus block is probably inadequate for the proximal humeral surgery. Missing blockade of the T1-T2 nerves may be the reason. We conduct this prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) to explore whether an additional T2 thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) can improve the success rate of regional anesthesia for elderly patients in proximal humeral fracture surgery. METHODS/DESIGN: The patients aged 65 years or older, referred for anterior-approach proximal humeral fracture surgery, will be enrolled. Each patient will be randomly assigned 1:1 to receive a combined interscalene brachial plexus with superficial cervical plexus block (IC) (combined interscalene brachial plexus with superficial cervical plexus block) or an IC block combined with thoracic paravertebral block (ICTP) block (combined thoracic paravertebral block with brachial plexus and superficial cervical plexus block). The primary outcome is the success rate of regional anesthesia without rescue analgesic methods. The secondary outcomes are as follows: sensory block at the surgical area, proportion of patients who need rescue anesthesia (intravenously administered remifentanil or conversion to general anesthesia), cumulative doses of intraoperative vasoactive medications and adverse events. The total sample size is estimated to be 80 patients. DISCUSSION: This RCT aims to confirm whether an additional T2 TPVB can provide better anesthetic effects of regional anesthesia with brachial and cervical plexus block in elderly patients undergoing proximal humeral surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03919422. Registered on 19 April 2019.

[Idiopathic axillary web syndrome]. / Síndrome axillary web idiopático.

We report the case of a 67-year-old woman who developed a cord of subcutaneous tissue extending from the axilla into the medial arm, accompanied by axillary neuropathic pain, with no history of surgery or infection. The patient was instructed in home exercises, and the condition progressively improved. Four months later, a small cord was visible on abduction with mild axillary dysesthesia, which was less severe than at onset. Diagnosis of exclusion was idiopathic axillary web syndrome (AWS). This syndrome is widely recognized after surgical axillary lymph node removal to treat breast cancer, but the etiopathogenesis is still unknown. Published reports of AWS with no history of surgery are rare, but a few reports have described this entity after infection or intense exercise. There are currently no previous reports of idiopathic AWS. The anatomical and clinical presentation, and clinical course of AWS without prior surgery, are similar to those of postoperative AWS.

Aberrant bifurcation of intercostobrachial nerve in the axilla: A case report.

Intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN) studies have been undertaken by many authors as it is a highly variable structure with numerous patterns reported worldwide. ICBN is a frequently damaged structure in Axillary Lymph Node Dissection (ALND) or mastectomy. Compression of this nerve, due to the enlargement of axillary lymph nodes from cancer breast may be presented as referred pain along the medial side of arm. Different patterns on the course and distribution of the ICBN have been described in literature. We encountered a lesser known variation of the ICBN where it pierced the second intercostal space as a single trunk and immediately divided into two branches. The putative clinical implications of this aberrant bifurcation are of value in significantly diminishing complications such as pain and sensory disturbances presenting after mastectomy and ALND. The findings of the presentation may be of use by surgeons and interventionists in approaching the area in a more precautious manner.

Evaluation the effect of preserving intercostobrachial nerve in axillary dissection for breast cancer patient.

BACKGROUND: The Intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN) is responsible for sensory function in the axillar and upper arm. The majority of surgeons routinely sacrifice the ICBN during axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) because of technical difficulties. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the effects of the preservation or division of the ICBN on the incidence of post-operative sensory disturbance, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and the physical functions of the upper limbs. METHODS: We performed a randomized double-blind trial comparing the incidence of sensory disturbance, HRQOL and physical functions of upper limbs in the preservation and the removal of the ICBN. Clinicians performed sensory evaluation at 2 weeks and 3 months after surgery. The sensory evaluation included questionnaires (subjective evaluation) and physical examination (objective evaluation) to evaluate sensory disturbance of the upper arm. HRQOL and physical function of upper limbs was accessed before surgery and at three months after surgery, using Short Form-36 and QuickDASH questionnaires, both in Thai language versions. RESULTS: At the end of the surgical procedures there were 15 patients in the preserved group (group P) and 28 patients in the non-preserved group (group N). In as-treated analysis, there was no significant difference between the groups in pain, sensory loss, physical examination of touch and pinprick sensation, and areas of sensory dullness. HRQOL found that the reported pain in P group was higher than N group in both intention-to-treat and as-treated analysis. In the QuickDASH scores of physical functions of the upper limbs there was a significant difference, 9.1 in group P and 20.5 in group N (P=0.013). CONCLUSIONS: ICBN preservation provides no benefit to improving sensation, but there are benefits in HRQOL and physical functions of upper limbs at three months after surgery.

An atypical biceps brachii and coracobrachialis muscles associated with multiple neurovascular aberrations: a case report with clinical significance.

Neural and vascular variations in the axilla and upper limb area are usually paired, but coexistence of muscular aberration on top of this is uncommon. The current case report emphasizes on the unilateral coexistence of a three-headed (tricipital) biceps brachii muscle, a two-headed coracobrachialis with an accessory muscle bundle joining the superficial and deep heads of coracobrachialis muscle. On the ipsilateral side of the 72-year-old male cadaver, a connecting branch originated from the musculocutaneous nerve and joined the median nerve after surpassing the accessory muscle bundle. A large diameter subscapular trunk originated from the 2nd part of the axillary artery and after giving off the 1st lateral thoracic artery trifurcated into a common stem which gave off the 2nd and 3rd lateral thoracic arteries, the circumflex scapular artery and a common branch that gave off the 4th and 5th lateral thoracic arteries and the thoracodorsal artery, as the ultimate branch. All lateral thoracic arteries were accompanied by multiple intercostobra- chial nerves. Documentation of such muscular and neurovascular variants and their embryologic origin increases awareness of their potential impact on diagnosis and treatment of upper limb pathology. To the best of our knowledge, the currently reported cadaveric observations seem to constitute a unique finding.

Randomized comparative study between two different techniques of intercostobrachial nerve block together with brachial plexus block during superficialization of arteriovenous fistula.

BACKGROUND: This study compared proximal and distal approaches of intercostobrachial nerve block (ICBNB) combined with infraclavicular brachial plexus block (ICBPB) during superficialization of arteriovenous fistula. METHODS: Seventy adult patients were randomized to receive ICBPB and 6 ml 0.25% bupivacaine at the level of the 3rd rib in the anterior axillary line between pectoralis minor and serratus anterior muscles (group P) or subcutaneously along the medial side of the upper arm (group D). The primary outcome was the achievement of complete sensory block. Secondary outcomes were onset of analgesia, volume of local anesthetic (LA) supplementation, fentanyl administration, success rate, and conversion to general anesthesia (GA). RESULTS: Complete sensory block in the medial side of the upper arm was achieved in 91% of patients in group P and 51% in group D. Failure rate of ICBNB was higher in group D (49%) than group P (14%). Conversion to GA was determined by the attending anesthesiologist in 26% of patients in group D and 0% in group P. LA supplementation was required in 5 patients in group P and 11 patients in group D, and the mean volume of LA was statistically higher in group D than group P (9.5 ± 1.5, 7.5 ± 2 ml, respectively). Onset of sensory block was faster in group P than group D (8.75 ± 1.67 and 10 ± 2.14 min, respectively). No differences were observed regarding fentanyl administration. CONCLUSION: ICBNB proximal approach provides a high success rate with less amount of rescue analgesia compared to the distal approach.

Aberrant Cutaneous Nerve Loops in the Axilla.

During routine dissection classes, conducted for first year undergraduate medical students, we encountered a rare anatomical variation in relation to the intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN). The ICBN represents the lateral undivided cutaneous branch of second intercostal nerve. In this case, the ICBN formed nerve loops with branches of the lateral cutaneous branch of the third intercostal nerve. These loops eventually gave branches that probably supplied the floor of the axilla and proximal arm. Nowadays, this ICBN is gaining clinical importance during the axillary lymph node dissections and mammary gland surgeries. Damage to the ICBN, may results in the sensory deficits in patients undergoing surgery. In our case report, ICBN was making aberrant nerve loop along with the branches from the third intercostal nerve. Knowledge regarding the origin, formation and route of ICBN is of clinical significance to axillary surgeons, radiologist and anesthesiologists.

The Relationship Between Sensory Loss and Persistent Pain 1 Year After Breast Cancer Surgery.

Moderate to severe persistent pain after breast cancer surgery (PPBCS) affects 10 to 20% of the patients. Sensory dysfunction is often concomitantly present suggesting a neuropathic pain state. The relationship between various postoperative pain states and sensory dysfunction has been examined using quantitative sensory testing (QST), but only 2 smaller studies have examined PPBCS and sensory dysfunction in the surgical area. The purpose of this prospective study was to assess the relative importance of sensory function and PPBCS. QST consisted of sensory mapping, tactile detection threshold, mechanical pain threshold, and thermal thresholds. Two hundred ninety patients were enrolled and results showed that 38 (13%) had moderate to severe pain and 246 (85%) had hypoesthesia in the surgical area 1 year after surgery. Increased hypoesthesia areas were associated with pain at rest as well as during movement (P = .0001). Pain during movement was associated with a side-to-side difference of 140% (P = .001) for tactile detection threshold and 40% (P = .01) for mechanical pain threshold as well as increased thermal thresholds in the axilla (P > .001). Logistic regression models controlling for confounders showed larger areas of hypoesthesia as a significant risk factor, odds ratio 1.85 per 100 cm2 for pain at rest and odds ratio 1.36 per 100 cm2 for pain during movement. PERSPECTIVE: PPBCS is associated with increasing areas of hypoesthesia as well as intraoperative nerve preservation. Thus, we hypothesize that PPBCS is associated with an interaction between a peripheral nociceptive drive in macroscopically preserved nerves and the central nervous system causing PPBCS as well as hypoesthesia. QST may identify patients suitable for intervention.

Origin, Branching, and Communications of the Intercostobrachial Nerve: a Meta-Analysis with Implications for Mastectomy and Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Breast Cancer.

The intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN), which usually originates from the lateral cutaneous branch of the second intercostal nerve, innervates areas of the axilla, lateral chest, and medial arm. It is at risk for injury during operative procedures that are often used in the management of breast cancer and such injury has been associated with postoperative sensory loss and neuropathic pain, decreasing the quality of life. PubMed, Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), Biosciences Information Service (BIOSIS), and Web of Science were searched comprehensively. Data concerning the prevalence, branching, origin and communications of the ICBN were extracted and pooled into a meta-analysis. A total of 16 studies (1,567 axillas) reported data indicating that the ICBN was present in 98.4% of person. It most often (90.6%) originated from fibers at the T2 spinal level and commonly coursed in two branching patterns: as a single trunk in 47.0% of cases and as a bifurcating pattern in 42.2%. In the latter cases, the bifurcation was usually unequal (63.4%). Additionally, the ICBN presented with anastomosing communication to the brachial plexus in 41.3% of cases. The ICBN is a prevalent and variable structure at significant risk for injury during operative procedures of the axilla. In view of the postoperative pain and paresthesia experienced by patients following injury, surgeons need to exercise caution and aim to preserve the ICBN when possible. Ultimately, careful dissection and knowledge of ICBN anatomy could allow postoperative complications to be reduced and patient's quality of life increased.