The Value of Computed Tomography-Based Planning in Shoulder Arthroplasty Compared to Intra-/Interobserver Reliability of X-ray Planning.

Background: Reversed total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is an established surgery for many pathologies of the shoulder and the demand continues to rise with an aging population. Preoperative planning is mandatory to support the surgeon's understanding of the patient's individual anatomy and, therefore, is crucial for the patient's outcome. Methods: In this observational study, we identified 30 patients who underwent RTSA with two- and three-dimensional preoperative planning. Each patient underwent new two-dimensional planning from a medical student and an orthopedic resident as well as through a mid-volume and high-volume shoulder surgeon, which was repeated after a minimum of 4 weeks. The intra- and interobserver reliability was then analyzed and compared to the 3D planning and the implanted prosthesis. The evaluated parameters were the size of the pegged glenoid baseplate, glenosphere, and humeral short stem. Results: The inter-rater reliability showed higher deviations in all four raters compared to the 3D planning of the base plate, glenosphere, and shaft. The intra-rater reliability showed a better correlation in more experienced raters, especially in the planning of the shaft. Conclusions: Our study shows that 3D planning is more accurate than traditional planning on plain X-rays, despite experienced shoulder surgeons showing better results in 2D planning than inexperienced ones.

Analysis of the Intra- and Inter-observer Reliabilities of Delbet Classification: Is Simplification Required.

Objective: This study aims to investigate the intra- and inter-reliabilities of Delbet classification and whether simplifying the classification improves reliability. Method: The Radiographs of 58 patients under 16 years old diagnosed with pediatric hip fractures between January 2012 and January 2020 were evaluated. Two separate Microsoft® PowerPoint (PPT) presentations consisting of 58 slides for Delbet's classification and its simplified form were prepared in which the order of cases was randomized and blinded. Then five orthopedic surgeons with different years of experience (more than 15 years of surgical experience were accepted experienced group) in pediatric trauma surgery evaluated the presentations two times one month apart. Results: In the inter-observer reliability analysis, a moderate agreement for the classical Delbet classification and a substantial agreement for the simplified Delbet classification was found in both evaluations. As a result of the intra-observer reliability analysis, there was substantial agreement in four observers, moderate agreement in one observer for the classical Delbet classification and substantial agreement in two observers, very good agreement in three observers for the simplified Delbet classification. The experience was not effective on agreement levels in the intra-observer reliability analysis of the classical Delbet classification system. The inter-reliability values of the less experienced group in the simplified classification were much higher than the classical Delbet classification. Conclusion: The simplification of the Delbet classification provides a significant increase in inter-observer reliability levels, especially in less experienced orthopedics and traumatology specialists, and a significant increase in intra-observer reliability levels. Level of Evidence: Level III, diagnostic study.

Validity and Reliability of Intraoral and Plaster Models' Photographs in the Assessment of Little's Irregularity Index, Tooth Size-Arch Length Discrepancy, and Bolton's Analysis.

Background Dental impressions have been required to obtain proper study models. This procedure is time- and labor-consuming for the orthodontist and could be exhausting to the patient, especially when braces are fitted in the context of a research project. This study aimed to assess the accuracy, reliability, and reproducibility of using intraoral photographs and plaster models' photographs in measuring Little's Irregularity Index (LII), tooth size-arch length discrepancy (TSALD), and Bolton's ratios. Methods A total of 52 dental arches of 26 patients were included in this study. Plaster models, occlusal intraoral photographs, and photographs of the collected plaster models were obtained for each patient. Then, LII, TSALD, and Bolton's ratios were measured using a manual caliper for plaster models' measurements and a software-based on-screen method for the photographs. Results The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of measurements made on intraoral photographs and photographs of plaster models were high (ranging from 0.90 to 0.99 and from 0.88 to 0.99, respectively), indicating a high level of agreement with the gold standard measurements. In addition, the differences were insignificant. The intra-/inter-examiner ICCs ranged from 0.90 to 0.99/0.92 to 0.99 and from 0.85 to 0.99/0.88 to 0.98 for plaster models and intraoral photographs of the dental arches, respectively. The analysis of reproducibility of capturing intraoral photographs of the dental arches on two different occasions showed high ICCs ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 with almost no significant differences between repeated measurements (P > 0.05). Conclusion LII, TSALD, and Bolton's overall and partial ratios can be measured from intraoral photographs of the dental arches with high accuracy, reliability, and reproducibility. Therefore, this methodology can be suggested for use in research projects when multiple records of the dental arches are required instead of depending on time- and labor-consuming procedures of ordinary dental impressions.

Inter- and intra-observer reliability of the "Assessment of Motor Repertoire- 3 to 5 Months" based on video recordings of infants with Prader-Willi syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The "Assessment of Motor Repertoire-3 to 5 Months", which is a part of Prechtl's General Movements Assessment (GMA), has been gradually applied to infants with genetic metabolic disorders. However, there have been no studies on the application of the GMA for infants with Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS). AIMS: The purpose of this study was to determine the inter- and intra-observer reliability of the assessment tool in a population of infants with PWS. STUDY DESIGN: This was a reliability and agreement study. SUBJECTS: This was a cross-sectional study with15 infants with PWS born at an average gestational age of 38 weeks. OUTCOME MEASURES: Standardized video recordings of 15 infants with PWS (corrected ages of 3 to 5 months) were independently assessed by three observers. Kappa and ICC statistics were applied in inter- and intra- observer reliability analyses. RESULTS: The overall reliability ICC values of the "Motor Optimality Score" (MOS) ranged from 0.84 to 0.98, and the pairwise agreement ranged between 0.86 and 0.95 for inter- observe reliability. In addition, ICC values for the MOS ranged between 0.95 and 0.98 for tester agreement in intra-observer reliability. Complete agreement reliability (100%) was achieved in the subcategories of "Fidgety Movements" and "Movement Character" for the inter- and intra-observer reliability. Moderate to high inter- and intra-observer reliability were found in the subcategories of "Repertoire of Co-Existent Other Movements", "Quality of Other Movements" and "Posture", with kappa values ranging between 0.63 and 1.00. CONCLUSION: There were high levels of inter-and intra-observer agreement in the "Assessment of Motor Repertoire-3 to 5 Months" for infants with PWS. It is possible to carry out standardized quantitative assessments of the motor performance of infants with PWS.

Intra- and inter-observer reliability of Cobb angle measurements in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

PURPOSE: The Cobb angle method is used to determine the severity of scoliosis. Therapeutic decisions for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) are guided by the Cobb angle. Therefore, high reliability is crucial. The objective of this study was to determine the intra- and inter-observer reliability of the digital Cobb angle measurements and the definition of end vertebrae in patients with AIS. Moreover, the influence of the observer's medical specialty and experience on Cobb angle measurement was evaluated. METHODS: Intra- and inter-observer reliability of the digital Cobb angle and end vertebrae is assessed in postero-anterior radiographs of 39 patients with AIS. Measurements were performed blinded and twice by six observers, with a two to 3 week interval. Intra- and inter-observer reliability was analysed by means of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). RESULTS: Both intra- and inter-observer reliability analyses resulted in ICC's higher than 0.864 for the Cobb angle and definition of end vertebrae. In addition, for the observer's experience and medical specialty group the inter-observer ICC's were higher than 0.984. The average inter-observer variability for the Cobb angle were 3°, and 1.1-1.6 levels for the cranial and caudal end vertebrae selection. The variability in measured Cobb angle was 1° for the experience group and 2° for the medical specialty group. Cronbach's alpha varied from 0.990 to 0.996. Bland-Altman plots showed moderate variation with a few outliers. CONCLUSIONS: The digital Cobb angle measurement as well as the definition of end vertebrae show excellent reliability. According to our results, medical specialty and experience do not affect Cobb angle measurements and definition of end vertebrae.

A novel radiological classification system of the distal femur.

INTRODUCTION: In our previous studies, we were able to identify anatomical differences as a predictor for aseptic loosening following primary and revision surgery with the use of rotating hinge prosthesis. This study was performed to answer following question: can a novel radiological classification system of the distal femur be identified? MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 200 patients who received standardized anteroposterior (AP) and lateral views of the knee joint were included in this study. On AP radiographs, we measured the distance between inner diameter of the femur at 20 cm proximally from the knee and at a point 2 cm proximally from the adductor tubercle. The ratio of the inner diameter of the femoral canal at 20 cm proximal of knee joint to the inner diameter of medullary canal at 2 cm proximal of adductor tubercle was used as a novel index ratio. Two observers blindly and independently reviewed the anteroposterior radiographs twice. RESULTS: Three groups of anatomical classification can be constructed for each sex according to the 25th and 75th percentiles. A higher distribution of Type C was found in female patients. The median intra-observer reliability for rater 1 was 0.995 (IQR 0.994-0.997). We had also a high inter-observer reliability with ICC of 0.997 (95% CI 0.996-0.998). CONCLUSIONS: The novel classification presents three different types of the knee joint for male and female patients. Type C has a wider inner diaphyseal diameter compared to Type A with a narrow inner diaphyseal diameter.

'Absolute' inter-observer classifications agreement for proximal humeral fractures with a single shoulder anteroposterior X-ray.

PURPOSE: Several studies have been carried out, and there is no classification for proximal humeral fractures (PHF) exempted from variability in interpretation and with questioned reliability. In the present study, we investigated the 'absolute diagnostic reliability' of the most currently used classifications for PHFs on a single anterior-posterior X-ray shoulder image. METHODS: Six orthopaedic surgeons, with varying levels of experience in shoulder pathology, evaluated radiographs from 30 proximal humeral fractures, according to the 'absolute reliability' criteria. Each of the observers rated each fracture according to Neer, Müller/AO and Codman-Hertel's classification systems. RESULTS: The overall inter-observer agreement (κ) has been 0.297 (CI95% 0.280 to 0.314) for the Neer's classification system, 0.206 (CI95% 0.193 to 0.218) for the Müller/AO classification system, and 0.315 (CI95% 0.334 to 0.368) for the Codman-Hertel classification system. We found loss of agreement in Neer's classification as the study progressed, low agreement in the AO classification, and stable values in the different evaluations with the best degree of agreement for Codman-Hertel classification, with a moderate agreement in the second evaluation among the six evaluators. CONCLUSION: The Neer, AO, and Hertel-Codman classification systems for PHF with a single radiographic projection have a difficult interpretation for orthopaedic surgeons of varying levels of experience, and therefore substantial agreements are not obtained.

Intra- and inter-observer reliability of implant positioning evaluation on a CT-based three-dimensional postoperative matching system for total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The evaluation of postoperative total knee arthroplasty (TKA) alignment mainly relies on measurement data obtained from plain radiographs. The aim of this retrospective observational study was to document the intra- and inter-observer reliability in assessment of TKA component positioning after surgery using a three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) image matching system. METHODS: Fourteen knees from 14 patients who received primary TKA were included, and images were analyzed by blinded readers not associated with the surgeries. The examiner digitized the reference points according to defined landmarks, and the designated size component was superimposed to the 3D reconstructed CT model for measurement. In addition to the evaluation of implant position against the coronal and sagittal lower limb mechanical axes that were defined based on bony landmarks, implant position against axes connecting implant-based reference points that are easier to indicate was evaluated. RESULTS: The overall intra- and inter-observer reliabilities determined by the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) of the implant alignment measurement for both femoral and tibial components were good (ICC > 0.60), except in the direction of femoral flexion and extension, for both mechanical and implant-based axes. The difference between implant alignment measurements according to the traditional mechanical axis and the implant-based axis ranged between means of 0.08o and 1.70o and were statistically significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: The postoperative evaluation of implant position in the coronal and sagittal planes using 3D-CT image matching is reliable and has good reproducibility except for the sagittal alignment assessment of the femoral component. The measured implant position according to the traditional mechanical axis and the implant-based axis were slightly but significantly different.

Reliability of the modified lateral pillar classification for Legg Calvé Perthes disease performed by a large group of international paediatric orthopaedic surgeons.

PURPOSE: The modified lateral pillar classification (mLPC) is used for prognostication in the fragmentation stage of Legg Calvé Perthes disease. Previous reliability assessments of mLPC range from fair to good agreement when evaluated by a small number of observers with pre-selected radiographs. The purpose of this study was to determine the inter-observer and intra-observer reliability of mLPC performed by a group of international paediatric orthopaedic surgeons. Surgeons self-selected the radiograph for mLPC assessment, as would be done clinically. METHODS: In total, 40 Perthes cases with serial radiographs were selected. For each case, 26 surgeons independently selected a radiograph and assigned mLPC and 21 raters re-evaluated the same 40 cases to establish intra-observer reliability. Rater performance was determined through surgeon consensus using the mode mLPC as 'gold standard'. Inter-observer and intra-observer reliability data were analysed using weighted kappa statistics. RESULTS: The weighted kappa for inter-observer correlation for mLPC was 0.64 (95% confidence interval: 0.55 to 0.74) and was 0.82 (range: 0.35 to 0.99) for intra-observer correlation. Individual surgeon's overall performance varied from 48% to 88% agreement. Surgeon mLPC performance was not influenced by years of experience (p = 0.51). Radiograph selection did not influence gold standard assignment of mLPC. There was greater agreement on cases of mild B hips and severe C hips. CONCLUSIONS: mLPC has low good inter-observer agreement when performed by a large number of surgeons with varied experience. Surgeons frequently chose different radiographs, with no impact on mLPC agreement. Further refinement is needed to help differentiate hips on the border of group B and C. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Non-invasive computer navigation can quantify the pivot shift maneuver with good to excellent reliability in healthy volunteers.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the inter- and intra-observer reliability of knee laxity assessment using a non-invasive navigation system in a population of healthy young athletes. It was hypothesized that knee laxity parameters recorded using non-invasive computer navigation would demonstrate good inter- and intra-observer reliability. METHODS: Healthy volunteers aged between 18 to 30 years were recruited to the study. Static and dynamic knee laxity parameters including anterior tibial translation and tibial rotation during the pivot shift test were recorded on awake patients using non-invasive computer navigation by two independent observers: at the first visit each athlete was evaluated by the consultant and resident surgeons independently; 6 weeks after the first visit all the participants were re-tested only by the resident surgeon. Inter- and intra-observer reliability was calculated and then interpreted according to Cicchetti's criteria. RESULTS: One hundred healthy volunteers were recruited to the study, of these 38 were women (38%), and the average age was 25.5 ± 2.4 years. According to Cicchetti's criteria the intra- and inter-observer reliability for static measurements were fair for anterior tibial translation (0.572 and 0.529, respectively) and excellent for total passive tibial rotation (0.859 and 0.883, respectively). For the dynamic measurements of translation and rotation during the pivot shift maneuver both measurements demonstrated good to excellent reliability with intra and inter observer reliability ranging from 0.684 to 0.936. CONCLUSION: Non-invasive navigation for the assessment of knee laxity is associated with fair to excellent inter- and intra-observer reliability in a population of healthy volunteers.

The artificial count of artifacts for thoracic ultrasound: what is the clinical usefulness?

Many works in the literature have shown that the increase in the number of B lines is a nonspecific sign of underlying pulmonary disease. Actually these artifacts are the result of a physical effect of ultrasound between the chest wall and the pulmonary air. Nevertheless the intra- and inter-operator variability in B-lines counting does not only reside only in the count itself but depends also on the type and frequency of the probe used, as well as the ultrasound scan machine setting and the patient's chest shape. In our opinion, proposing a software algorithm to count lines B seems like an unproductive effort.

Reliability of B-line quantification by different-level observers and a software algorithm using point-of-care lung ultrasound.

Quantification of B-lines on lung ultrasonographs is operator-dependent and considered a semi-quantitative method. To avoid this variability, we designed a software algorithm for counting B-lines. We compared the number of B-lines obtained in real-time by observers with three different levels of experience and by the software algorithm, and analyzed intra-rater variability in terms of the estimated number of B-lines in two successive examinations. Forty mechanically ventilated adult (≥ 18 years) intensive care unit patients were included in this prospective study. All patients underwent two consecutive ultrasound examinations for B-lines detection by three human observers (OB1 = high, OB2 = medium, OB3 = low level of experience) and by the software (OBS). Ultrasound scans were obtained on the anterior right and left thoracic side along the midclavicular line, in the second and fourth intercostal space; B-lines counting for each position lasted 10 s. To assess intra-observer variability, a second ultrasound scan was obtained 15-30 min after the first scan. For all lung zones, the intraclass correlation for B-lines counting between OB1 and OB2 was 0.663; between OB1 and OB3, 0.559; and between OB1 and OBS, 0.710. OBS had a better concordance coefficient (0.752) between the first and the second measurements than did the human observers. Our results show that the software algorithm for B-lines counting is a potentially promising alternative when observers have little lung ultrasound experience.

Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging Provide Superior Reliability for Achilles and Patellar Tendon Cross-Sectional Area Measurements Compared with Ultrasound Imaging?

This study investigated the reliability of Achilles and patellar tendon cross-sectional area (CSA) measurement using ultrasound imaging (USI) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Fifteen healthy adults were imaged twice on two occasions, interrupted by a tendon loading protocol. Tendon CSA segmentations were conducted by an experienced and an inexperienced rater blinded to information regarding subject, session and loading status. USI provided good test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC] 2,1 > 0.85, standard error of measurement [SEM] 5%-6%), while with MRI it was excellent (ICC 2,1 > 0.92, SEM 4%) for the experienced rater. This study suggests that MRI provides superior reliability for tendon CSA measurements compared with USI. However, the difference in reliability between the methods was small, and the results were inconclusive regarding objectivity and sensitivity to change when assessed based on the effect of loading. We concluded that both methods can be used for reliable CSA measurements of the Achilles and patellar tendons when using a highly standardized measurement protocol and when conducted by an experienced rater.

The paediatric version of Wisconsin gait scale, adaptation for children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: In clinical practice there is a need for a specific scale enabling detailed and multifactorial assessment of gait in children with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy. The practical value of the present study is linked with the attempts to find a new, affordable, easy-to-use tool for gait assessment in children with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy. The objective of the study is to evaluate the Wisconsin Gait Scale (WGS) in terms of its inter- and intra-rater reliability in observational assessment of walking in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. METHODS: The study was conducted in a group of 34 patients with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. At the first stage, the original version of the ordinal WGS was used. The WGS, consisting of four subscales, evaluates fourteen gait parameters which can be observed during consecutive gait phases. At the second stage, a modification was introduced in the kinematics description of the knee and weight shift, in relation to the original scale. The same video recordings were rescored using the new, paediatric version of the WGS. Three independent examiners performed the assessment twice. Inter and intra-observer reliability of the modified WGS were determined. RESULTS: The findings show very high inter- and intra-observer reliability of the modified WGS. This was reflected by a lack of systematically oriented differences between the repeated measurements, very high value of Spearman's rank correlation coefficient 0.9 ≤ |R| < 1, very high value of ICC > 0.9, and low value of CV < 2.5% for the specific physical therapists. CONCLUSIONS: The new, ordinal, paediatric version of WGS, proposed by the authors, seems to be useful as an additional tool that can be used in qualitative observational gait assessment of children with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Practical dimension of the study lies in the fact that it proposes a simple, easy-to-use tool for a global gait assessment in children with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy. However, further research is needed to validate the modified WGS by comparing it to other observational scales and objective 3-dimensional spatiotemporal and kinematic gait parameters. TRIAL REGISTRATION: anzctr.org.au , ID: ACTRN12617000436370 . Registered 24 March 2017.

Inter- and intra-observer reliability of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging parameters in children with suspected juvenile idiopathic arthritis of the hip.

BACKGROUND: Previous work at our institution demonstrated discrepancies between radiologists in interpretation of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in suspected hip arthritis. OBJECTIVE: To assess inter- and intra-observer reliability of selected MRI parameters (effusion, marrow oedema and synovial thickness and enhancement) used in the diagnosis of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of patients with confirmed or suspected juvenile idiopathic arthritis who underwent hip contrast-enhanced MRI between January 2011 and September 2014. Three pediatric musculoskeletal radiologists independently assessed all scans for effusion, marrow oedema, measurement of synovial thickness, synovial enhancement and subjective assessment of synovium. Categorical variables were analysed using the Cohen κ, and measurement using Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: Eighty patients were included. Interobserver reliability was moderate for effusion (κ=0.5-0.7), marrow oedema (κ=0.6), subjective synovial assessment (κ=0.4-0.5) and synovial enhancement (κ=0.1-0.5). Intra-observer reliability was highest for marrow oedema (κ=0.6-0.8) and lowest for effusion (κ=0.4-0.7). Intra-observer reliability for synovial enhancement (κ= -0.7-0.8) and subjective synovial assessment (κ=0.4-1.0) ranged from poor to excellent. For synovial thickness, intra- and interobserver Bland-Altman plots were well clustered around the mean suggesting good agreement. CONCLUSION: There were large differences across variables and only moderate agreement between observers. The most reliable parameters were presence of joint effusion and bone marrow oedema and subjective assessment of synovium.

Image enhancement effect on inter and intra-observer reliability of nailfold capillary assessment.

BACKGROUND: Nailfold capillaroscopy (NC) is a diagnostic imaging technique that is used to assess the blood capillary network in the nailfold area. NC is routinely used for patients with microcirculation problems, such as systemic sclerosis and other connective tissue diseases. Experts commonly use subjective evaluation as a reference point in images of nailfold video capillaroscopy, so it is important to reduce the inherent ambiguities in human judgment and diagnosis. Image quality is an important factor that affects measurement error and assessment time of NC images. OBJECTIVE: In this study, a new image enhancement technique was introduced and evaluated subjectively. METHODS: In total, 475 nailfold video capillaroscopy images from 18 healthy subjects and 41 systemic lupus erythematosus patients were used. The images were randomly divided into two sets, one each with 275 and 200. Eight independent observers who were familiar with the capillaroscopy technique participated in this study. The set of 275 images was evaluated by three observers with the forced-choice pairwise comparison method. Elliptic broken line (EBL) was used to count the number of capillaries. The intra- and inter-observer reliability of the original and enhanced images was evaluated on 200 images by five observers. RESULT: Except for eight images, all observers preferred the enhanced images in the visual quality comparison method. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) of intra- and inter-observer reliability increased from 0.76-0.84 to 0.82-0.89, respectively, when using the enhancement method. CONCLUSION: By improving the image quality, more capillary details will be visible, and an observer can document more details that may not be visible in the original image and can do so more efficiently.

Morphometric investigations to assess the compatibility of mandible and skull.

When a morphologically separated skull and mandible are found in the same case context, the possibility of a match arises. Two criteria with which to determine a match are the rough articulation between the mandibular condyles and cranial base itself and, most importantly, the fit of the teeth. However, when there has been intravital or postmortem tooth loss, this important criterion is not available. To date, only Reichs (1989) has investigated further compatibility criteria to solve the question of putative commingling in a case where a mandible seemed to originate from a female, while all other bones originated from a male individual. In a different reported case (Preißler et al. 2017), a mandible seemed too big for a skull; DNA analysis, however, confirmed that both originated from the same female individual. To investigate the metric relationship between mandible and skull we measured the postmortem CT data records of 223 corpses (virtual skulls) in OsiriX© MD for the following linear parameters: bicondylar breadth (KDB), biradicular breadth (AUB), and bizygomatic breadth (ZYB). The indices KDB/ZYB and KDB/AUB were developed and used to define ranges for matches and mismatches. Furthermore, the intra-observer reliability for the method was assessed. An intraclass correlation coefficient of >0.99 for every parameter showed that the used measurements are highly reliable. The 2.5-97.5 percentile for the KDB/AUB index lay between 0.91 and 1.05, while the range for the KDB/ZYB index was between 0.87 and 1.00. Within these ranges, it is possible to roughly assess whether or not a mandible and skull might be compatible, even if this can only be verified by forensic DNA analysis. If an index value lies outside these ranges, it can be assumed that skull and mandible do not match. Future studies should include more samples from a broader population spectrum so that these metric relationships can be used for different populations.

Evaluation of inter- and intra-observer reliability of current classification systems for subtrochanteric femoral fractures.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the inter- and intra-observer reliability of the Russell Taylor, Seinsheimer and AO classification systems, and to investigate whether or not the experience of the surgeon had any effect on the classification. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All the radiographs of 35 patients with subtrochanteric femur fracture were classified by 16 observers using the Russell Taylor, Seinsheimer and 31-AO classifications. Two groups of observers were formed of eight orthopedic surgeons, each with at least five-year experience and eight orthopedic assistants, from six different hospitals, who were invited to participate in the study. All the observers reviewed all the X-rays at this first evaluation. At 6 weeks after the first evaluation, the same radiographs were presented to each observer again in a random order and all the observers were requested to classify the fractures again. To evaluate the inter- and intra-observer reliability, the Fleiss kappa and Cohen's kappa values were used. RESULTS: In the inter-observer reliability, the mean values of the two evaluations for the Russell Taylor classification were determined to be κ:0.724 (substantial) for the specialists and κ:0.722 (substantial) for the assistants. Using the Seinsheimer classification, the mean values were κ:0.691 (substantial) for the specialists and κ:0.629 (substantial) for the assistants, and for the AO classification, the mean values were κ:0.279 (fair) for the specialists and κ:0.291 (fair) for the assistants. In the intra-observer reliability, the median values for the Russell Taylor classification were determined to be κ:0.955 (almost perfect) for the specialists and κ:0.855 (almost perfect) for the assistants. Using the Seinsheimer classification, the median values were κ:0.915 (almost perfect) for the specialists and κ:0.900 (almost perfect) for the assistants, and for the AO classification, the median values were κ:0.665 (substantial) for the specialists and κ:0.695 (substantial) for the assistants. CONCLUSIONS: As both the Russell Taylor and Seinsheimer classifications were found to be more reliable and reproducible than the AO classification for subtrochanteric femoral fractures, they can be considered to be more valuable in clinical practice and communication. The experience of the surgeons was not found to have any significance in the evaluation of these three classification systems in these types of fractures.

Intra-observer and inter-observer reliability of leg circumference measurement among six observers: a single blinded randomized trial.

Hypothesis: Circumference measurement of extremities that was reported to be a reliable method as long as being standardized is commonly used both in clinical and home settings by clinicians or caregivers due to its cheapness and easy use. Objectives: The aims of this study were to determine the inter-observer and intra-observer reliability of manual circumference measurement among different observers and various measurement points. Methods and Results: A total of 58 lower limbs were included in the study. Both lower limbs of each subject were assessed by 6 observers randomly using circumference measurement method from 9 reference points specified with a Leg-O-Meter. All observers performed the measurements and they were blind to each other's measurements. Results: Measurement results from reference points were statistically significant between good to perfect (ICC 0.65-0.99, p<0.001). Interrater reliability of all observers' first and second measurements showed perfect reliability for both measurements (ICC: 0.92-0.99, p<0.001). Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the lower extremity manual circumference measurement is a reliable method for clinical practice. Abbreviations: BMI = Body Mass Index, ICC = Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, Metatarsal heads (cA), Ankle-heel (cY), Ankle (cB), Distal beginning point of gastrocnemius (cB1), The widest point for gastrocnemius (cC), Head of fibula (cD), Midline of knee (cE), Midline of thigh (cF), Groin level (cG).

Reliability of a Scoring System for Qualitative Evaluation of Lymphoscintigraphy of the Lower Extremities.

Lymphoscintigraphy is an imaging technique to diagnose and characterize the severity of edema in the upper and lower extremities. In lymphoscintigraphy, a scoring system can increase the ability to differentiate between diagnoses, but the use of any scoring system requires sufficient reliability. Our aim was to determine the inter- and intraobserver reliability of a proposed scoring system for visual interpretation of lymphoscintigrams of the lower extremities. Methods: The lymphoscintigrams of 81 persons were randomly selected from our database for retrospective evaluation. Two nuclear medicine physicians scored these scans according to the 8 criteria of a proposed scoring system for visual interpretation of lymphoscintigrams of the lower extremities. Each scan was scored twice 3 mo apart. The total score was the sum of the scores for all criteria, with a potential range of 0 (normal lymphatic drainage) to 58 (severe lymphatic impairment). The intra- and interobserver reliability of the scoring system was determined using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, percentage of agreement, weighted κ, and intraclass correlation coefficient with 95% confidence interval. In addition, for 7 categories, differences in total scores between and within observers were determined. Results: We found some insignificant differences between observers. Percentage agreement was high or very high, at 82.7%-99.4% between observers and 84.6%-99.4% within observers. For each criterion of the scoring system, the κ-correlations showed moderate to very good inter- or intraobserver reliability. The total scores for all criteria had good inter- and intraobserver reliability. Regarding the interobserver comparison, 66% and 64% of the difference in total scores were within ±1 scale point (-1, +1), and regarding the intraobserver comparison, 68% and 72% of the difference in total scores were within ±1 scale point. Conclusion: The proposed scoring system is a reliable tool for visual qualitative evaluation of lymph transport problems in patients with lymphedema of the lower extremities.