Accelerated partial breast irradiation: Current evidence and future developments.

Whole breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery for early breast cancer has become one of the standard treatment modes for breast cancer and yields the same effect as radical surgery. Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) as a substitute for whole breast irradiation for patients with early breast cancer is a hot spot in clinical research. APBI is characterised by simple high-dose local irradiation of the tumour bed in a short time, thus improving convenience for patients and saving costs. The implementation methods of APBI mainly include brachytherapy, external beam radiation therapy, and intraoperative radiotherapy. This review provides an overview of the clinical effects and adverse reactions of the main technologies of APBI and discusses the prospects for the future development of APBI.

Salvage breast conserving surgery and re-irradiation with intraoperative electrons for recurrent breast cancer: a multicentric study on behalf of AIRO (Italian Association of Radiotherapy and clinical Oncology).

AIM: Intraoperative radiotherapy with electrons (IOERT) may represent a viable choice for partial breast re-irradiation (rePBI) after repeat quadrantectomy for local recurrence (LR) for primary breast cancer (BC) in lieu of mastectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A database collecting data on rePBI with IOERT from 8 Italian centres was set up in 2016- 2018, providing data on cumulative incidence (CumI) of 2nd LR nd survival with a long follow-up (FU) RESULTS: From 2002 to 2015, 109 patients underwent the conservative retreatment. The median primary BC -1stLR interval was 11.1 years (range: 2.4-27.7). The median 1stLR size was 0.9 cm (range: 0.3-3.0) and 43.6% were Luminal A. Median IOERT dose was 18 Gy (range: 12-21) and median collimator was 4 cm (range: 3-6). Median FU was 11.7 years (interquartile range: 7.7-14.6). The 2ndLR CumI was 12.2% (95% CI: 6.8-19.2) at 5 years and 32.3% at 10 years (95% CI: 22.8-42.2), occurring in the same site as the 1stLR in about half of the cases. HER2 status and collimator size were independent LR predictors. The 5- and 10-year overall survival were 95.2% and 88.3%, respectively, while 5- and 10-year BC specific survival were 98% and 94.5%. The development of a 2ndLR significantly reduced BCSS (HR=9.40, P<0.001). Grade ≥3 fibrosis was 18.9%. Patient-reported cosmesis was good/excellent in 59.7% of the cases. CONCLUSION: 2ndLR CumI was within the range of the literature, but higher than expected, opening questions on radiation field extension and fractionation schedule. Since a 2ndLR worsened the outcome, salvage modality must be carefully planned.

Acute and Long-Term Toxicity after Planned Intraoperative Boost and Whole Breast Irradiation in High-Risk Patients with Breast Cancer-Results from the Targeted Intraoperative Radiotherapy Boost Quality Registry (TARGIT BQR).

In the context of breast cancer treatment optimization, this study prospectively examines the feasibility and outcomes of utilizing intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) as a boost in combination with standard external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for high-risk patients. Different guidelines recommend such a tumor bed boost in addition to whole breast irradiation with EBRT for patients with risk factors for local breast cancer recurrence. The TARGIT BQR (NCT01440010) is a prospective, multicenter registry study aimed at ensuring the quality of clinical outcomes. It provides, for the first time, data from a large cohort with a detailed assessment of acute and long-term toxicity following an IORT boost using low-energy X-rays. Inclusion criteria encompassed tumors up to 3.5 cm in size and preoperative indications for a boost. The IORT boost, administered immediately after tumor resection, delivered a single dose of 20 Gy. EBRT and systemic therapy adhered to local tumor board recommendations. Follow-up for toxicity assessment (LENT SOMA criteria: fibrosis, teleangiectasia, retraction, pain, breast edema, lymphedema, hyperpigmentation, ulceration) took place before surgery, 6 weeks to 90 days after EBRT, 6 months after IORT, and then annually using standardized case report forms (CRFs). Between 2011 and 2020, 1133 patients from 10 centers were preoperatively enrolled. The planned IORT boost was conducted in 90%, and EBRT in 97% of cases. Median follow-up was 32 months (range 1-120, 20.4% dropped out), with a median age of 61 years (range 30-90). No acute grade 3 or 4 toxicities were observed. Acute side effects included erythema grade 1 or 2 in 4.4%, palpable seroma in 9.1%, punctured seroma in 0.3%, and wound healing disorders in 2.1%. Overall, chronic teleangiectasia of any grade occurred in 16.2%, fibrosis grade ≥ 2 in 14.3%, pain grade ≥ 2 in 3.4%, and hyperpigmentation in 1.1%. In conclusion, a tumor bed boost through IORT using low-energy X-rays is a swift and feasible method that demonstrates low rates in terms of acute or long-term toxicity profiles in combination with whole breast irradiation.

The Role of Intraoperative Radiotherapy Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) has been used in the treatment of locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancers for the last several decades. Given the heterogeneity of patients treated and different indications for use and dosing at different institutions, it has been difficult to discern if IORT adds any appreciable benefit to standard of care therapies. Herein, the rationale for IORT in rectal cancer is discussed along with the most modern and best available data in 2023. IORT is likely indicated in patients with locally advanced and locally recurrent rectal cancer with threatened margins (R0 or R1 resection) to help improve local control. High-quality imaging and multidisciplinary discussion are necessary to ensure optimal patient selection. Appropriate counseling of the patient and excellent team communication are of the utmost importance given the challenging nature of these cases and the prognostic implications of R1 and R2 resections in this patient population.

Extracellular volume-based scoring system for tracking tumor progression in pancreatic cancer patients receiving intraoperative radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the value of extracellular volume (ECV) derived from portal-venous phase (PVP) in predicting prognosis in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) patients receiving intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) with initial stable disease (SD) and to construct a risk-scoring system based on ECV and clinical-radiological features. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and three patients with LAPC who received IORT demonstrating SD were enrolled and underwent multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) before and after IORT. ECV maps were generated from unenhanced and PVP CT images. Clinical and CT imaging features were analyzed. The independent predictors of progression-free survival (PFS) determined by multivariate Cox regression model were used to construct the risk-scoring system. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and the Kaplan-Meier method were used to evaluate the predictive performance of the scoring system. RESULTS: Multivariable analysis revealed that ECV, rim-enhancement, peripancreatic fat infiltration, and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) response were significant predictors of PFS (all p < 0.05). Time-dependent ROC of the risk-scoring system showed a satisfactory predictive performance for disease progression with area under the curve (AUC) all above 0.70. High-risk patients (risk score ≥ 2) progress significantly faster than low-risk patients (risk score < 2) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: ECV derived from PVP of conventional CECT was an independent predictor for progression in LAPC patients assessed as SD after IORT. The scoring system integrating ECV, radiological features, and CA19-9 response can be used as a practical tool for stratifying prognosis in these patients, assisting clinicians in developing an appropriate treatment approach. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The scoring system integrating ECV fraction, radiological features, and CA19-9 response can track tumor progression in patients with LAPC receiving IORT, aiding clinicians in choosing individual treatment strategies and improving their prognosis. KEY POINTS: Predicting the progression of LAPC in patients receiving IORT is important. Our ECV-based scoring system can risk stratifying patients with initial SD. Appropriate prognostication can assist clinicians in developing appropriate treatment approaches.

Intraoperative radiotherapy combined with spinal stabilization surgery-a novel treatment strategy for spinal metastases based on a first single-center experiences.

INTRODUCTION: Current treatment of spinal metastases (SM) aims on preserving spinal stability, neurological status, and functional status as well as achieving local control. It consists of spinal surgery followed by radiotherapy and/or systemic treatment. Adjuvant therapy usually starts with a delay of a few weeks to prevent wound healing issues. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) has previously been successfully applied during brain tumor, breast and colorectal carcinoma surgery but not in SM, including unstable one, to date. In our case series, we describe the feasibility, morbidity and mortality of a novel treatment protocol for SM combining stabilization surgery with IORT. METHODS: Single center case series on patients with SM. Single session stabilization by navigated open or percutaneous procedure using a carbon screw-rod system followed by concurrent 50 kV photon-IORT (ZEISS Intrabeam). The IORT probe is placed via a guide canula using navigation, positioning is controlled by IOCT or 3D-fluroscopy enabling RT isodose planning in the OR. RESULTS: 15 (8 female) patients (71 ± 10y) received this treatment between 07/22 and 09/23. Median Spinal Neoplastic Instability Score was 8 [7-10] IQR. Most metastasis were located in the thoracic (n = 11, 73.3%) and the rest in the lumbar (n = 4, 26.7%) spine. 9 (60%) patients received open, 5 (33%) percutaneous stabilization and 1 (7%) decompression only. Mean length of surgery was 157 ± 45 min. Eleven patients had 8 and 3 had 4 screws placed. In 2 patients radiotherapy was not completed due to bending of the guide canula with consecutive abortion of IORT. All other patients received 8 Gy isodoses at mdn. 1.5 cm [1.1-1.9, IQR] depth during 2-6 min. The patients had Epidural Spinal Cord Compression score 1a-3. Seven patients (46.7%) experienced adverse events including 2 surgical site infection (one 65 days after surgery). CONCLUSION: 50 kV photon IORT for SM and consecutive unstable spine needing surgical intervention is safe and feasible and can be a promising technique in selected cases.

A Novel Treatment Planning Design for Intraoperative Electron Radiation Therapy (IOERT) using an Electronic Board.

Background: Intraoperative Irradiation Therapy (IORT) refers to the delivery of radiation during surgery and needs the computed- thickness of the target as one of the most significant factors. Objective: This paper aimed to compute target thickness and design a radiation pattern distributing the irradiation uniformly throughout the target. Material and Methods: The Monte Carlo code was used to simulate the experimental setup in this simulation study. The electron flux variations on an electronic board's metallic layer were studied for different thicknesses of the target tissue and validated with experimental data of the electronic board. Results: Based on the electron number for different Poly Methyl Methacrylate (PMMA) phantom thicknesses at various energies, 6 MeV electrons are suitable to determine the target thickness. Uniformity in radiation and corresponding time for each target were investigated. The iso-dose and percentage depth dose curves show that higher energies are suitable for treatment and distribute uniform radiation throughout the target. Increasing the phantom thickness leads to rising radiation time based on the radiation time corresponding to these energies. The tissue thickness of each section is determined, and the radiation time is managed by scanning the target. Conclusion: Calculation of the thickness of the remaining tissue and irradiation time are needed after incomplete tumor removal in IORT for various remaining tissues. The patients should be protected from overexposure to uniform irradiation of tissues since the radiation dose is prescribed and checked by an oncologist.

Efficacy and Safety of Intraoperative Radiotherapy for High-Grade Gliomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: High-grade gliomas (HGGs) are aggressive tumors of the central nervous system that cause significant morbidity and mortality. Despite advances in surgery and radiation therapy (RT), HGG still has a high incidence of recurrence and treatment failure. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) has emerged as a promising therapeutic approach to achieve local tumor control while sparing normal brain tissue from radiation-induced damage. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines to evaluate the use of IORT for HGG. Eligible studies were included based on specific criteria, and data were independently extracted. Outcomes of interest included complications, IORT failure, survival rates at 12 and 24 months, and mortality. RESULTS: Sixteen studies comprising 436 patients were included. The overall complication rate after IORT was 17%, with significant heterogeneity observed. The IORT failure rate was 77%, while the survival rates at 12 and 24 months were 74% and 24%, respectively. The mortality rate was 62%. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that IORT may be a promising adjuvant treatment for selected patients with HGG. Despite the high rate of complications and treatment failures, the survival outcomes were comparable or even superior to conventional methods. However, the limitations of the study, such as the lack of a control group and small sample sizes, warrant further investigation through prospective randomized controlled trials to better understand the specific patient populations that may benefit most from IORT. However, the limitations of the study, such as the lack of a control group and small sample sizes, warrant further investigation. Notably, the ongoing RP3 trial (NCT02685605) is currently underway, with the aim of providing a more comprehensive understanding of IORT. Moreover, future research should focus on managing complications associated with IORT to improve its safety and efficacy in treating HGG.

Intraoperative radiotherapy in recurrent IDH-wildtype glioblastoma with gross total resection: A single-center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Isocitrate dehydrogenase-wildtype (IDHwt) glioblastoma (GBM) is one of the most aggressive primary brain tumors. The recurrence of GBM is almost inevitable. As an adjuvant option to surgery, intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) is gaining increasing attention in the treatment of glioma. This study is aimed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of IORT on recurrent IDHwt GBM. METHODS: In total, 34 recurrent IDHwt GBM patients who received a second surgery were included in the analysis (17 in the surgery group and 17 in the surgery + IORT group). RESULTS: The progression-free survival and overall survival after the second surgery were defined as PFS2 and OS2, respectively. The median PFS2 was 7.3 months (95% CI: 6.3-10.5) and 10.6 months (95% CI: 9.3-14.6) for those patients who received surgery and surgery + IORT, respectively. Patients in the surgery + IORT group also had a longer OS2 (12.8 months, 95% CI: 11.4-17.2) than those in the surgery group (9.3 months, 95% CI: 8.9-12.9). The Kaplan-Meier survival curves, analyzed by log-rank test, revealed a statistically significant difference in PFS2 and OS2 between both groups, suggesting that IORT plays an active role in the observed benefits for PFS2 and OS2. The effects of IORT on PFS2 and OS2 were further confirmed by multivariate Cox hazards regression analysis. Two patients in the surgery group developed distant glioma metastases, and no radiation-related complications were observed in the IORT group. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that low-dose IORT may improve the prognosis of recurrent IDHwt GBM patients. Future prospective large-scale studies are needed to validate the efficacy and safety of IORT.

Impaired Aortic Growth in Neuroblastoma Patients After Intensive Treatment.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the abdominal aortic diameter in high-risk neuroblastoma (NB) patients and the risk of aortic narrowing following intensive treatment. METHODS: We measured the aortic diameter at four specific levels of the abdominal aorta (diaphragmatic crus, celiac axis, and the root of the superior (SMA) and inferior (IMA) mesenteric arteries) on contrast CT scans. The control group consisted of 56 children with non-oncologic disorders, while the NB group included 35 patients with high-risk abdominal NB. We used regression analysis of age and aortic diameter to determine the regression formula for each level in each group and performed intergroup comparisons using t-test. RESULTS: We evaluated a total of 160 contrast-enhanced CTs performed in the 35 eligible cases. The aortic diameter of pretreated NB patients was not significantly different from the controls. After receiving any treatment, the aortic diameter was significantly smaller in the NB group (p < 0.01 each). Patients who underwent radical surgery, particularly gross total resection (n = 26), had smaller aortic diameters at all levels compared to controls (p < 0.01 each). Patients treated with radiotherapy (RT) had smaller aortic diameters than controls. External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) patients (n = 24) had smaller aortic diameters at all levels except the celiac axis (crus, SMA, IMA; p < 0.01 each), and intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) ± EBRT patients (n = 5) had smaller aortic diameters at all levels (p < 0.01 each). CONCLUSION: Patients with NB may experience impaired development of the abdominal aorta after multimodal therapy, particularly after RT. Close observation and long-term follow-up is essential to monitor for catastrophic vascular complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: LEVEL III.

Case Report: Bilateral targeted intraoperative radiotherapy: a safe and effective alternative for synchronous bilateral breast cancer.

Background: The incidence of bilateral breast cancer (BBC) ranges from 1.4% to 11.8%. BBC irradiation is a challenge in current clinical practice due to the large target volume that must be irradiated while minimizing the dose to critical organs. Supine or prone breast techniques can be used, with the latter providing better organ sparing; both, however, result in lengthy treatment times. The use of Intra-operative radiotherapy (IORT) in breast cancer patients who choose breast conservation has been highlighted in previous studies, but there is a scarcity of literature analyzing the utility and applicability of IORT in BBC. This case series aims to highlight the applicability of administering bilateral IORT in patients with BBC. Case reports: Five patients with bilateral early-stage breast cancer (or DCIS) were treated with breast-conserving surgery followed by bilateral IORT. Of the 10 breast cancers, 8 were diagnosed as either DCIS or IDC, while the other 2 were diagnosed as invasive lobular carcinoma and invasive carcinoma, respectively. During surgery, all patients received bilateral IORT. Furthermore, 1 patient received external beam radiation therapy after her final pathology revealed grade 3 DCIS. The IORT procedure was well tolerated by all five patients, and all patients received aromatase inhibitors as adjuvant therapy. Additionally, none of these patients showed evidence of disease after a 36-month median follow-up. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate the successful use of IORT for BCS in patients with BBC. Furthermore, none of the patients in our study experienced any complications, suggesting the feasibility of the use of IORT in BBC. Considering the benefits of improved patient compliance and a reduced number of multiple visits, IORT may serve as an excellent patient-centered alternative for BBC. Future studies are recommended to reinforce the applicability of IORT in patients with BBC.

Intraoperative radiotherapy in breast cancer: Alterations to the tumor microenvironment and subsequent biological outcomes (Review).

Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) is a precise, single high­dose irradiation directly targeting the tumor bed during surgery. In comparison with traditional external beam RT, it minimizes damage to other normal tissues, ensures an adequate dose to the tumor bed and results in improved cosmetic outcomes and quality of life. Furthermore, IORT offers a shorter treatment duration, lower economic costs and therapeutic efficacy comparable with traditional RT. However, its relatively higher local recurrence rate limits its further clinical applications. Identifying effective radiosensitizing drugs and rational RT protocols will improve its advantages. Furthermore, IORT may not only damage DNA to directly kill breast tumor cells but also alter the tumor microenvironment (TME) to exert a sustained antitumor effect. Specific doses of IORT may exert anti­angiogenic effects, and consequently antitumor effects, by impacting post­radiation peripheral blood levels of vascular endothelial growth factor and delta­like 4. IORT may also modify the postoperative wound fluid composition to continuously inhibit tumor growth, e.g. by reducing components such as microRNA (miR)­21, miR­221, miR­115, oncostatin M, TNF­ß, IL­6 and IL­8, and by elevating levels of components such as miR­223, to inhibit the ability of postoperative wound fluid to induce proliferation, invasion and migration of residual cancer cells. IORT can also modify cancer cell glucose metabolism to inhibit the proliferation of residual tumor cells. In addition, IORT can induce a bystander effect, eliminating the postoperative wound fluid­induced epithelial­mesenchymal transition and tumor stem cell phenotype. Insights gained at the molecular level may provide new directions for identifying novel therapeutic targets and approaches. A more comprehensive understanding of the effects of IORT on the breast cancer (BC) TME may further its clinical application. Hence, the present article reviews the primary effects of IORT on BC and its impact on the TME, aiming to offer fresh research perspectives for relevant professionals.

Intraoperative radiotherapy after resection of brain metastases located in the posterior fossa. Analysis of postoperative morbidity and mortality in a single center cohort.

INTRODUCTION: In order to improve surgical outcome and accelerate the adjuvant oncologic therapy, intraoperative Radiotherapy (IORT) has become a treatment option in oncologic surgery for various diseases including glioma and brain metastasis (BM). BMs are often located in the cranial posterior fossa (PF) requiring specific surgical considerations due to its complex anatomy. Up until now, data on IORT for BMs is limited and detailed description in the use of IORT for lesions in the PF is lacking. Our aim is to provide more insight into this emerging treatment strategy. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients receiving surgery for BMs and undergoing IORT at our institution. Each patient was discussed at the interdisciplinary tumor board decision before the intervention. Patient characteristics, functional status (Karnofsky Performance Score, KPS) before and after surgery, disease (recursive partitioning analysis, lesion size) and operative parameters were analyzed. Adverse events (AE) were recorded up until 30 days after the intervention and rated according to the Clavien Dindo Rating scale. RESULTS: Nine patients (5 female) were included. None underwent prior radiotherapy (RT). Mean age was 66 ± 11 years. Preoperative median KPS was 80%. Mean BM diameter was 3.2 ± 0.9 cm. There was no statistically significant deterioration of the functional status after the intervention. Two patients experienced AEs with both of them needing revision surgery. CONCLUSION: Surgery for BMs with IORT in the PF seems safe and feasible. Further studies are needed to evaluate the influence of IORT on long-term outcome after BM surgery.

Intraoperative or postoperative stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases: time to systemic treatment onset and other patient-relevant outcomes.

PURPOSE: Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) has become a viable treatment option for resectable brain metastases (BMs). As data on local control and radiation necrosis rates are maturing, we focus on meaningful secondary endpoints such as time to next treatment (TTNT), duration of postoperative corticosteroid treatment, and in-hospital time. METHODS: Patients prospectively recruited within an IORT study registry between November 2020 and June 2023 were compared with consecutive patients receiving adjuvant stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) of the resection cavity within the same time frame. TTNT was defined as the number of days between BM resection and start of the next extracranial oncological therapy (systemic treatment, surgery, or radiotherapy) for each of the groups. RESULTS: Of 95 BM patients screened, IORT was feasible in 84 cases (88%) and ultimately performed in 64 (67%). The control collective consisted of 53 SRT patients. There were no relevant differences in clinical baseline features. Mean TTNT (range) was 36 (9 - 94) days for IORT patients versus 52 (11 - 126) days for SRT patients (p = 0.01). Mean duration of postoperative corticosteroid treatment was similar (8 days; p = 0.83), as was mean postoperative in-hospital time (11 versus 12 days; p = 0.97). Mean total in-hospital time for BM treatment (in- and out-patient days) was 11 days for IORT versus 19 days for SRT patients (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: IORT for BMs results in faster completion of interdisciplinary treatment when compared to adjuvant SRT, without increasing corticosteroid intake or prolonging in-hospital times. A randomised phase III trial will determine the clinical effects of shorter TTNT.

Outcomes of Breast Intraoperative Electron Beam Radiotherapy (IOeRT) : Case Series of Single Institute Experience in Saudi Arabia.

INTRODUCTION: 85-90% of local recurrences after breastconserving surgery occurs within the index quadrant. Intraoperative radiotherapy may be a good alternative for eligible patients avoiding long course of adjuvant radiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were early stage node negative at least 50 years at time of inclusion, unicentric less than 30mm in diameter any hormone receptor status. 21 Gy was delivered intraoperatively, biologically equivalent to 58 to 60 Gy in standard fractionation using electron beam to 90% isodose line. Cosmetic, Oncological and Patient Satisfaction Evaluation of treated Patients between March 2018 and August 2020 at the King Khalid university hospital, using the IOeRT (Mobetron® ). Evaluation done at a combined clinic between surgical and radiation oncology teams at the end of the follow up period before publication. RESULTS: 15 female patients were evaluable with mean follow up period 33.8 months (19-48 months). Mean Age 56.4 years (50-65 years). Mean tumor size 1.213 cm. Majority of patients were T1. 2 patients showed Sentinel lymph node positive.21 Gy was delivered intraoperatively.4 Patients (26.7%) received adjuvant postoperative external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). 2 patients due to being in Caution group due to positive extensive Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). External beam radiation was 40 Gy/15 fractions/3 weeks using three dimensional radiation therapy (3DCRT). Cosmetically, Apart from one patient score 9 due to presence of keloid scar formation, most patients were in range of 0-3 according to physician evaluation and Modified Hollander's score otherwise, No more than score 3 in any of the patients was detected. Oncologically, Till the time of publication no local or distant relapses was detected. As a patient experience, 100 % of patients were satisfied. CONCLUSION: Breast IOERT is a convenient, safe and a valid treatment modality as an option for patients who are otherwise appropriate candidates for APBI. Proper patient selection should focus on clinicopathologic factors predictive of negative nodes and negative margins. Careful assessment of preoperative mammographic and other imaging studies for features, such as extent of calcifications, may be helpful.

Primer consenso español sobre el uso de la radioterapia intraoperatoria en el cáncer de mama. Conclusiones del panel de expertos / First Spanish consensus on the use of intraoperative radiotherapy in breast cancer. Conclusions of the expert panel

Introducción: la publicación de ensayos aleatorizados con resultados a largo plazo ha demostrado que la radioterapia intraoperatoria (RIO) en cáncer de mama en estadio precoz puede ser una alternativa terapéutica en casos bien seleccionados. En el presente trabajo se presentan los resultados del Primer Consenso de Radioterapia Intraoperatoria en Cáncer de Mama realizado de manera multidisciplinar en España. Material y método: se hizo una revisión sistemática de la literatura y se invitó a todos los oncólogos radioterápicos y cirujanos expertos en RIO en cáncer de mama de España a participar en el consenso. Se aplico la siguiente metodología en 2 fases: a) la creación de un grupo de trabajo y la revisión de la evidencia; b) la realización de la encuesta y generación de recomendaciones consensuadas. Resultados: han participado un total 95,65% de los centros que actualmente utilizan esta técnica en cáncer de mama y que fueron invitados. Los expertos estuvieron de acuerdo en el uso de RIO exclusiva en cáncer de mama en aquellas pacientes mayores de 60 años y por encima de 50 años posmenopáusicas, con carcinoma ductal infiltrante o subtipos histológicos favorables, sin invasión linfovascular, tumores menores o iguales a 25 mm, márgenes de resección libres y receptores hormonales positivos. La utilización de RIO como rescate de recidiva local después de la irradiación externa alcanzó un nivel de consenso muy fuerte. Conclusión: el presente consenso pretende establecer las guías respecto a las indicaciones de RIO exclusiva o como sobreimpresión anticipada y ser una ayuda para la toma conjunta de decisiones. (AU)

Introduction: The publication of randomized trials with long-term results has demonstrated that intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) in early-stage breast cancer can be a therapeutic alternative for well-selected cases. This paper present work presents the results of the first multidisciplinary consensus on IORT in breast cancer carried out in Spain. Materials and methods: A systematic literature review was conducted, and all radiation oncologists and surgeons with expertise in IORT for breast cancer in Spain were invited to participate in the consensus. The following methodology was employed in two phases: a) creation of a working group and review of the evidence; b) conduct of the survey and generation of consensus recommendations. Results: A total of 95.65% of the invited centers currently utilizing this technique in breast cancer participated. The experts agreed on the use of exclusive intraoperative radiation therapy in breast cancer for patients above 60 years of age and above 50 years postmenopausal, with invasive ductal carcinoma or favorable histological subtypes, no lymphovascular invasion, tumors less than or equal to 25 mm, clear surgical margins, and positive hormone receptor. The use of IORT as salvage surgery for local recurrence after external irradiation achieved a very strong consensus level. Conclusion: The present consensus aims to establish guidelines regarding the indications for exclusive IORT or as an early boost, and to serve as an aid for joint decision-making. (AU)

Tumor Bed Boost Radiotherapy in the Conservative Treatment of Breast Cancer: A Review of Intra-Operative Techniques and Outcomes.

Conservative surgery is the preferred treatment in the management of breast cancer followed by adjuvant whole-breast irradiation. Since the tumor bed is the main site of relapse, boost doses are conveniently administered according to risk factors for local relapse to increase the efficacy of the treatment. The benefit of a radiation boost is well established and it can be performed by several techniques like brachytherapy, external radiation or intraoperative radiotherapy. Greater precision in localizing the tumor cavity, immediacy and increased biological response are the main advantages of intraoperative boost irradiation. This modality of treatment can be performed by means of mobile electron accelerators or low-photon X-ray devices. There is a lot of research and some published series analyzing the results of the use of an intraoperative boost as an adjuvant treatment, after neoadjuvant systemic therapy and in combination with some reconstructive surgeries. This review discusses advantages of intraoperative radiotherapy and presents the main results of a boost in terms of local control, survival, tolerance and cosmesis.

End-To-End Procedure For IORT in Brain Metastases and Film Dosimetry.

Purpose: The study is intended to perform an end-to-end test of the entire intraoperative process using cadaver heads. A simulation of tumor removal was performed, followed by irradiation of the bed and measurement of absorbed doses with radiochromic films. Materials and Methods: Low-energy X-ray intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) was used for irradiation. A computed tomography study was performed at each site and the absorbed doses calculated by the treatment planning system, as well as absorbed doses with radiochromic films, were studied. Results: The absorbed doses in the organs at risk (OAR) were evaluated in each case, obtaining maximum doses within the tolerance limits. The absorbed doses in the target were verified and the deviations were <1%. Conclusions: These tests demonstrated that this comprehensive procedure is a reproducible quality assurance tool which allows continuous assessment of the dosimetric and geometric accuracy of clinical brain IORT treatments. Furthermore, the absorbed doses measured in both target and OAR are optimal for these treatments.

Outcome assessment of intraoperative radiotherapy for brain metastases: results of a prospective observational study with comparative matched-pair analysis.

PURPOSE: Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) is an emerging alternative to adjuvant stereotactic external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) following resection of brain metastases (BM). Advantages of IORT include an instant prevention of tumor regrowth, optimized dose-sparing of adjacent healthy brain tissue and immediate completion of BM treatment, allowing an earlier admission to subsequent systemic treatments. However, prospective outcome data are limited. We sought to assess long-term outcome of IORT in comparison to EBRT. METHODS: A total of 35 consecutive patients, prospectively recruited within a study registry, who received IORT following BM resection at a single neuro-oncological center were evaluated for radiation necrosis (RN) incidence rates, local control rates (LCR), distant brain progression (DBP) and overall survival (OS) as long-term outcome parameters. The 1 year-estimated OS and survival rates were compared in a balanced comparative matched-pair analysis to those of our institutional database, encompassing 388 consecutive patients who underwent adjuvant EBRT after BM resection. RESULTS: The median IORT dose was 30 Gy prescribed to the applicator surface. A 2.9% RN rate was observed. The estimated 1 year-LCR was 97.1% and the 1 year-DBP-free survival 73.5%. Median time to DBP was 6.4 (range 1.7-24) months in the subgroup of patients experiencing intracerebral progression. The median OS was 17.5 (0.5-not reached) months with a 1 year-survival rate of 61.3%, which did not not significantly differ from the comparative cohort (p = 0.55 and p = 0.82, respectively). CONCLUSION: IORT is a safe and effective fast-track approach following BM resection, with comparable long-term outcomes as adjuvant EBRT.

Evaluating the induced photon contamination by different breast IOERT shields using Monte Carlo simulation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Avoiding the underlying healthy tissue over-exposure during breast intraoperative electron radiotherapy (IOERT) is owing to the use of some dedicated radioprotection disks during patient irradiation. The originated contaminant photons from some widely used double-layered shielding disks including PMMA+Cu, PTFE+steel, and Al+Pb configurations during the breast IOERT have been evaluated through a Monte Carlo (MC) simulation approach. METHODS: Produced electron beam with energies of 6, 8, 10, and 12 MeV by a validated MC model of Liac12 dedicated IOERT accelerator was used for disk irradiations. Each of above-mentioned radioprotection disks was simulated inside a water phantom, so that the upper disk surface was positioned at R90 depth of each considered electron energy. Simulations were performed by MCNPX (version 2.6.0) MC code. Then, the energy spectra of the contaminant photons at different disk surfaces (upper, middle, and lower one) and relevant contaminant dose beneath the studied disks were determined and compared. RESULTS: None of studied shielding disks show significant photon contamination up to 10 MeV electron energy, so that the induced photon dose by the contaminant X-rays was lower than those observed in the disk absence under the same conditions. In return, the induced photon dose at a close distance to the lower disk surface exceeded from calculated values in the disk absence at 12 MeV electron energy. The best performance in contaminant dose reduction at the energy range of 6-10 MeV belonged to the Al+Pb disk, while the PMMA+Cu configuration showed the best performance in this regard at 12 MeV energy. CONCLUSION: Finally, it can be concluded that all studied shielding disks not only don't produce considerable photon contamination but also absorb the originated X-rays from electron interactions with water at the electron energy range of 6-10 MeV. The only concern is related to 12 MeV energy where the induced photon dose exceeds the dose values in the disk absence. Nevertheless, the administered dose by contaminant photons to underlying healthy tissues remains beneath the tolerance dose level by these organs at the entire range of studied electron energies.