Effects of Lidocaine on Motor-Evoked Potentials and Somatosensory-Evoked Potentials in Patients Undergoing Intraspinal Tumour Resection: Study Protocol for a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: At present, it is believed that intravenous (IV) infusion of lidocaine can inhibit hyperalgesia, relieve postoperative acute and chronic pain, and accelerate the rehabilitation of patients. However, studies of its effects on necessary electrophysiological monitoring during neurosurgery are few, and the results are controversial. This study assumes that the propofol-remifentanil based anaesthesia combined with lidocaine in patients undergoing intraspinal tumour resection will not have adverse effects on motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) or somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This is a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind trial. A total of 96 patients undergoing intraspinal tumour resection will be randomly allocated to lidocaine and placebo group. The lidocaine group will receive IV lidocaine during anaesthesia, while the placebo group will receive the same dose of normal saline with the same infusion rate and infusion time, and the anaesthesia procedures of the two groups will be the same. All patients will be monitored the MEPs and SEPs of all four limbs during operation. The primary outcome will be the MEP amplitudes of both upper limbs at the end of operation. The secondary outcome measures will be the other electrophysiological parameters at the end of operation, the incidence of alert events for all four limbs, and the incidence of false positive events. DISCUSSION: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of IV infusion of lidocaine on SEPs and MEPs during intraspinal tumour resection to determine whether electrophysiological monitoring can accurately reflect the integrity of nerve functions while infusing lidocaine and to explore the possibility of lidocaine use during intraspinal tumour resection as an anaesthesia option.

Microsurgical removal of intraspinal meningioma: Skill required and surgical effect / 中华显微外科杂志

Objective:To investigate the effect of treatment of spinal meningioma with microsurgical procedures.Methods:From January 2003 to March 2022, there were 120 patients who had spinal meningioma and treated in the Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. Their clinical data were retrospectively analysed. Of the 120 patients, there were 90 females and 30 males, aged from 14 to 85 (average, 54) years old. According to McCormick Classification, 29 cases were in grade I, 59 cases were in grade II, 25 cases were in grade III, and 7 cases were in grade IV. They were all underwent microsurgery. Patients were followed up by outpatient service within 3 months after surgery, then reviewed by outpatient visits and telephone interviews. McCormick's classification method and MRI examination were used to analyse the neurological and imaging changes of the patients before and after the surgery.Results:A total of 113 patients had complete resection and 7 had the resection of most part of the spinal meningioma. No infection, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, other complications and death occurred. Three months after surgery, 95 patients achieved the improvement or even completely disappearance of symptoms (such as numbness, pain, limited movement, etc.). There were 23 patients who had the symptoms unchanged as what before the surgery. Two patients had the symptoms worsened after the surgery. At 3 months after surgery, 95 cases (79.2%) improved, 23 cases (19.2%) were stable, and 2 cases (1.6%) aggravated. According to McCormick classification method, 92 cases were in grade Ⅰ, 15 cases were in gradeⅡ, 10 cases were in grade Ⅲ, and 3 cases were in grade Ⅳ. MRI scans showed that the dural sac were well refluxed, and no recurrence was found.Conclusion:Microsurgery is safe and effective for removal of spinal meningioma, with significant improvement in symptoms with fewer complications.

Efficacy analysis of two surgical treatments for thoracic and lumbar intraspinal tumours.

BACKGROUND: Surgery remains the main curative option for the treatment of intraspinal tumour. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the clinical outcomes of laminoplasty with process-lamina complex replantation compared with laminectomy with pedicle screw fixation for intraspinal tumours. METHODS: In our retrospective analysis, 27 patients received tumour resection surgery by laminoplasty with reconstruction plate fixation and 32 patients received laminectomy with pedicle screw fixation. All patients were followed up for at least 1 year. Data, including surgical time, blood loss, volume of drainage, drainage time, hospital stay, complications, and neurological status were compared. In addition, imaging evaluation was also included. RESULTS: Patients in the laminoplasty group had lower blood loss (laminoplasty group: 281.5 ± 130.2 mL; laminectomy group: 450.0 ± 224.3 mL; p = 0.001), shorter surgical time (laminoplasty group: 141.7 ± 26.2 min, laminectomy group: 175.3 ± 50.4 min; p = 0.003), lower volume of drainage (laminoplasty group: 1578.9 ± 821.7 mL, laminectomy group: 2621.2 ± 1351.0 mL; p = 0.001), shorter drainage time (laminoplasty group: 6.6 ± 2.5 days, laminectomy group: 9.7 ± 1.8 days; p = 0.000), and a shorter hospital stay (laminoplasty group: 16.9 ± 4.9 days, laminectomy group: 21.0 ± 4.4 days; p = 0.002) compared with patients in the laminectomy group. There were significant differences of oswestry dysfunction index (ODI) between the two groups at 12 months postoperatively (p = 0.034). The incidence of secondary spinal stenosis in the laminoplasty group was significantly reduced (p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Laminoplasty in intraspinal tumour resection has a lower blood loss and volume of drainage, shorter surgical time and hospital stay as advantages over the standard laminectomy technique. Moreover, laminoplasty can effectively avoid iatrogenic spinal canal stenosis and thus enhancing functional recovery of spinal cord.

Retrospective observational comparative study of Hemilaminectomy versus Laminectomy for intraspinal tumour resection; Shorter Stays, Lower Analgesic Usage and Less Kyphotic Deformity.

INTRODUCTION: Intraspinal tumours are rare and principally managed surgically. Laminectomy, employed for access to the spinal canal, destroys the posterior tension band leading to a risk of kyphosis. Hemilaminectomy as an alternative may be less destructive, potentially reducing the risk of deformity and causing less post-operative pain. METHOD: We investigated this hypothesis by retrospectively reviewing a case series of 56 surgeries for a disparate and unselected group of intraspinal tumours utilizing a laminectomy or hemilaminectomy approach. RESULTS: No difference was found in length of operation, completeness of resection, complication rate and Frankel-score improvements. Hemilaminectomy (n = 22) is associated with reduced hospital stay (post-op days) 4.5 (2-6) versus 6 (3-8), (p = 0.026, Mann-Whitney), and a reduction in post-operative morphine use (mg) 10 (3.5-28) versus 30 (10-90), (p = 0.005, Mann-Whitney). Post-operative kyphosis was measured with the Harrison posterior tangent method on T2-weighted sagittal MR images. The average change in kyphosis angle was greater in the laminectomy group compared with the hemilaminectomy group, 3.6 (0.8-6.2) versus 0.4 (-0.2-1.2), statistically significant (p = 0.004, Mann-Whitney). CONCLUSION: Hemilaminectomy is as effective an access procedure for the resection of unselected intraspinal tumours as laminectomy, but is associated with shorter post-operative stays, lower analgesic requirements and less post-operative kyphosis.