Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 78
Filter
1.
Neurooncol Pract ; 11(4): 452-463, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39006528

ABSTRACT

Background: Melanoma leptomeningeal disease (LMD) has a poor prognosis. However, the management of patients with advanced melanoma has evolved with time, including those with LMD. We reviewed a large cohort of melanoma LMD patients to assess factors associated with survival. Methods: Retrospective clinical data was collected on patients diagnosed with LMD at MD Anderson Cancer Center from 2015 to 2020. Overall survival (OS) was determined from LMD diagnosis to date of death or last follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to estimate OS and to assess univariate group differences, respectively. Multivariable associations of survival with variables of interest were determined using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Results: A total of 172 patients were identified. The median age at LMD diagnosis was 53 (range 20-79) years, and all patients had radiographic evidence of LMD on magnetic resonance imaging of either brain or spine. In total 143 patients previously received systemic therapy (83%), with a median of 2 prior treatments (range 0-5). 81 patients (47%) had concurrent uncontrolled systemic disease and 80 patients (53%) had elevated serum LDH at the time of diagnosis. With a median follow-up of 4.0 months (range 0.1-65.3 months), median OS for all patients from LMD diagnosis was 4.9 months. Patients (n = 45) who received intrathecal therapy or systemic immunotherapy for LMD had a median OS of 8.0 months and 10.2 months, respectively. On multivariable analysis, decreased performance status, positive CSF cytology, elevated LDH, and whole brain radiation were associated with worse OS. Conclusions: Despite many advances in therapeutic options, the outcomes of melanoma patients with LMD remains poor. However, a subset of patients appears to derive benefit from LMD-directed treatment.

2.
Neuro Oncol ; 2024 Jun 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38902944

ABSTRACT

Leptomeningeal metastases are increasingly becoming recognized as a treatable, yet generally incurable, complication of advanced cancer. As modern cancer therapeutics have prolonged the lives of patients with metastatic cancer, specifically in patients with parenchymal brain metastases, treatment options and clinical research protocols for patients with leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors have similarly evolved to improve survival within specific populations. Recent expansion in clinical investigation, early diagnosis, and drug development have given rise to new unanswered questions. These include leptomeningeal metastasis biology and preferred animal modeling, epidemiology in the modern cancer population, ensuring validation and accessibility of newer leptomeningeal metastasis diagnostics, best clinical practices with multi-modality treatment options, clinical trial design and standardization of response assessments, and avenues worthy of further research. An international group of multi-disciplinary experts in the research and management of leptomeningeal metastases, supported by the Society for Neuro-Oncology and American Society of Clinical Oncology, were assembled to reach a consensus opinion on these pressing topics and provide a roadmap for future directions. Our hope is that these recommendations will accelerate collaboration and progress in the field of leptomeningeal metastases and serve as a platform for further discussion and patient advocacy.

3.
Neurosurg Focus ; 56(6): E12, 2024 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38823042

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was 1) to describe the rate of intrathecal baclofen (ITB)-associated complications at a large tertiary center, and 2) to evaluate the impact of patient-related factors on the likelihood of developing such complications. METHODS: A retrospective single-center study was carried out. A total of 301 eligible patients were included in the analysis. Univariate regression models were used to evaluate the impact of age, sex, diagnosis, ambulation status, modified Ashworth scale score, body mass index, diabetes status, and pain level on the likelihood of developing a device-related infection, pump malfunction, catheter malfunction, and other clinically significant complications. RESULTS: Overall, 27% of patients experienced an ITB-related complication. The most common complications included infection (6%, 18/301), pump malfunction (7.3%, 22/301), and catheter malfunction (14%, 42/301). The univariate analyses revealed that the patient's ambulatory status had a significant impact on the likelihood of developing a catheter-related malfunction. Furthermore, a trend toward significance was identified between patients' preoperative body mass index and device-related infection. Finally, the risk of suffering any ITB-related complications was statistically correlated with the number of years that had passed since the initial pump implantation. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' analysis reveals a previously underrecognized association between ambulatory status at the time of ITB pump implantation and the incidence of catheter-related complications, and confirms the impact of time since surgery on the risk of developing any ITB-related complication. The patient's age, sex, diagnosis, diabetes status, or pain level at baseline were not associated with the risk of complications. Collectively, these insights contribute novel information to the existing literature, providing practical value for physicians in guiding patient selection for ITB therapy.


Subject(s)
Baclofen , Infusion Pumps, Implantable , Injections, Spinal , Muscle Relaxants, Central , Humans , Baclofen/administration & dosage , Baclofen/adverse effects , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Risk Factors , Infusion Pumps, Implantable/adverse effects , Muscle Relaxants, Central/administration & dosage , Muscle Relaxants, Central/adverse effects , Injections, Spinal/adverse effects , Aged , Young Adult , Muscle Spasticity/drug therapy , Equipment Failure/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent
4.
Surg Neurol Int ; 15: 57, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38468682

ABSTRACT

Background: Cerebral abscesses complicated by ventriculitis present significant treatment challenges, often associated with high morbidity and mortality. Traditional management approaches, including systemic antibiotic therapy and external ventricular drainage (EVD), face limitations due to the blood-brain barrier and risks of catheter-related complications. This report discusses a case where the dual-lumen catheter system, an innovative neurosurgical tool integrating continuous irrigation with drainage, was employed. Case Description: A patient presented with a cerebral abscess ruptured into the ventricle, leading to ventriculitis. Conventional treatment options were limited due to the abscess's deep and eloquent location and the associated risk of complications from standard EVD. The dual lumen system was chosen for its ability to provide continuous irrigation and drainage, effectively addressing issues of catheter blockage and enhancing localized antibiotic delivery. The system was used to create a single stereotactic tract for simultaneous treatment of the abscess and ventriculitis. This approach allowed for a more controlled and effective treatment process, resulting in rapid resolution of the conditions without chronic hydrocephalus development or further complications. Conclusion: The use of the dual lumen system represented a significant advancement in this case, addressing the limitations of conventional treatments. Its ability to maintain intracranial pressure within optimal limits while providing localized, continuous treatment was pivotal. This case highlights the potential of the dual lumen catheter in managing complex neurosurgical infections and underscores the need for further research to establish its efficacy in broader clinical applications.

5.
Lancet Reg Health Eur ; 39: 100862, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38361750

ABSTRACT

Background: Evidence for the efficacy of nusinersen in adults with 5q-associated spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) has been demonstrated up to a period of 16 months in relatively large cohorts but whereas patients reach a plateau over time is still to be demonstrated. We investigated the efficacy and safety of nusinersen in adults with SMA over 38 months, the longest time period to date in a large cohort of patients from multiple clinical sites. Methods: Our prospective, observational study included adult patients with SMA from Germany, Switzerland, and Austria (July 2017 to May 2022). All participants had genetically-confirmed, 5q-associated SMA and were treated with nusinersen according to the label. The total Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded (HFMSE) and Revised Upper Limb Module (RULM) scores, and 6-min walk test (6 MWT; metres), were recorded at baseline and 14, 26, and 38 months after treatment initiation, and pre and post values were compared. Adverse events were also recorded. Findings: Overall, 389 patients were screened for eligibility and 237 were included. There were significant increases in all outcome measures compared with baseline, including mean HFMSE scores at 14 months (mean difference 1.72 [95% CI 1.19-2.25]), 26 months (1.20 [95% CI 0.48-1.91]), and 38 months (1.52 [95% CI 0.74-2.30]); mean RULM scores at 14 months (mean difference 0.75 [95% CI 0.43-1.07]), 26 months (mean difference 0.65 [95% CI 0.27-1.03]), and 38 months (mean difference 0.72 [95% CI 0.25-1.18]), and 6 MWT at 14 months (mean difference 30.86 m [95% CI 18.34-43.38]), 26 months (mean difference 29.26 m [95% CI 14.87-43.65]), and 38 months (mean difference 32.20 m [95% CI 10.32-54.09]). No new safety signals were identified. Interpretation: Our prospective, observational, long-term (38 months) data provides further real-world evidence for the continuous efficacy and safety of nusinersen in a large proportion of adult patients with SMA. Funding: Financial support for the registry from Biogen, Novartis and Roche.

6.
Cells ; 13(3)2024 Jan 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38334635

ABSTRACT

Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is a rare, aggressive hematologic malignancy with poor outcomes. The World Health Organization (WHO) redefined BDCN as a distinct disease entity in 2016. BPDCN arises from plasmacytoid dendritic cells, manifesting primarily in the skin, bone marrow, and lymph nodes, occasionally involving the central nervous system (CNS). This presents challenges in diagnosis and treatment, with CNS involvement often overlooked in standard diagnostic workups due to BPDCN's rarity and patients often being neurologically asymptomatic at diagnosis. CNS involvement typically emerges during relapse, yet clinical trials often exclude such cases, limiting our understanding of its development and treatment. Treatment options for CNS involvement include intrathecal (IT) chemotherapies like methotrexate and cytarabine, often in combination with systemic agents. Tagraxofusp and traditional regimens for acute myeloid leukemia show limited success at preventing CNS relapse, prompting exploration of combined therapies like hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (HyperCVAD) with venetoclax and adding IT chemotherapy to other backbones. Ongoing clinical trials investigating emerging therapies offer hope despite limited focus on CNS implications. Trials incorporating CNS-involved patients aim to pioneer novel treatment approaches, potentially reshaping BPDCN management. Understanding CNS involvement's complexities in BPDCN remains crucial for tailored treatments and better patient outcomes.


Subject(s)
Myeloproliferative Disorders , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Central Nervous System/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Myeloproliferative Disorders/pathology , Dendritic Cells/pathology , Recurrence
7.
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd ; 84(1): 59-67, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38205044

ABSTRACT

Around 5 percent of all patients with metastatic breast cancer go on to develop distant metastases in the meninges, also known as meningeal carcinomatosis. The median survival of these patients is between 3.5 and 4.5 months. Current treatment approaches are based on radiotherapy, systemic and intrathecal therapy. Methotrexate, liposomal cytarabine and trastuzumab are the most common substances used for intrathecal therapy. The aim of this review was to provide an overview of these intrathecal therapy options for meningeal carcinomatosis. A systematic search of the literature was carried out in PubMed using the following search terms: "meningeal metastases", "meningeal carcinomatosis", "leptomeningeal metastasis", "leptomeningeal carcinomatosis", "leptomeningeal disease", "breast cancer", "MTX", "methotrexate", "DepoCyte", "liposomal cytarabine", "trastuzumab" and "anti-HER2". This search resulted in 75 potentially relevant studies, 11 of which were included in this review after meeting the previously determined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The studies differ considerably with regards to study design, cohort size, and dosages of administered drugs. In principle, intrathecal therapy has a tolerable side-effects profile and offers promising results in terms of the median overall survival following treatment with trastuzumab for HER2-positive primary tumors. The focus when treating meningeal carcinomatosis must be on providing a multimodal individual therapeutic approach. However, comprehensive studies which compare the efficacy and side effects of individual pharmaceuticals are lacking. Because of the poor prognosis associated with meningeal carcinomatosis, an approach which treats only the symptoms (best supportive care) should always be considered and discussed with affected patients.

8.
BMC Neurol ; 24(1): 43, 2024 Jan 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38267835

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Spinal adhesive arachnoiditis is a chronic inflammatory process of the leptomeninges and intrathecal neural elements. The possible causes of arachnoiditis are: infections, injuries of spinal cord, surgical procedures and intrathecal administration of therapeutic substances or contrast. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of 56-old woman with spinal muscular atrophy type 3 who developed a severe back pain in the lumbosacral region after the fifth dose of nusinersen given intrathecally. Magnetic resonance of lumbosacral spine showed spinal adhesive arachnoiditis. She received high doses of methylprednisolone intravenously, and later non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, alpha lipoic acid, vitamins and rehabilitation with slight improvement. CONCLUSIONS: The authors summarize that scheduled resonance imaging of the lumbosacral spine may be an important element of the algorithm in the monitoring of novel, intrathecal therapy in patients with spinal muscular atrophy.


Subject(s)
Arachnoiditis , Muscular Atrophy, Spinal , Spinal Muscular Atrophies of Childhood , Adult , Female , Humans , Arachnoiditis/complications , Arachnoiditis/diagnostic imaging , Arachnoiditis/drug therapy , Inflammation
9.
Cancer Treat Rev ; 122: 102653, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38118373

ABSTRACT

Clinical data supporting the best therapeutic approach in leptomeningeal disease (LMD; also known as leptomeningeal metastases or leptomeningeal carcinomatosis) are lacking. Despite the development of new agents and increasing incidence of central nervous system metastases, patients with LMD are often excluded from clinical trials in breast cancer, with very few conducted specifically in LMD. Consequently, current evidence may not provide an accurate reflection of real-world clinical practice. This review aims to provide further insight into the treatment strategies for patients with breast cancer and LMD. We explore differences between clinical and real-world studies, considering inclusion criteria, levels of evidence for LMD diagnosis, and time between diagnosis of LMD and LMD-specific treatment initiation. Patient prognosis is poor; median overall survival is limited to several months, with approximately 10% of patients alive at 12 months. Efficacy results have been reported for various systemic and intrathecal agents in LMD to date. Systemic therapies under investigation for LMD in breast cancer include tucatinib, trastuzumab deruxtecan, and paclitaxel trevatide; trastuzumab is the main intrathecal agent currently under investigation. Recent trials investigating systemic or intrathecal therapies are typically small, single-arm studies, and most are restricted to patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer. Moreover, the variability among inclusion criteria and response assessment tools makes the interpretation of results difficult. Large retrospective cohorts with various inclusion criteria and treatment regimens provide some real-world data. However, there remains an urgent need for randomised clinical trials which include patients with LMD across all breast cancer subtypes.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Meningeal Carcinomatosis , Meningeal Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Meningeal Carcinomatosis/drug therapy , Prognosis , Meningeal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Meningeal Neoplasms/pathology
10.
Br J Pain ; 17(6): 569-578, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37974633

ABSTRACT

Introduction: In an important percentage of intrathecal infusion therapy, the pain after implantation of a spinal device does not improve. Our objective is to identify factors that can predict therapeutic success and complications, developing a predictive model based on univariate and multivariate analyses. Methods: Retrospective observational study, including 132 patients with oncological pain who were implanted with a fixed-flow device for intrathecal infusion. Four time points were established for data collection and, in addition to demographic and anthropometric data, variables related to oncologic pain pathology, initiation of therapy, pain control and complications were collected. Based on univariate and multivariate analyses, we performed predictive models on efficacy and complications. Results: The mean baseline pain intensity was VAS 7.78, and when comparing the values before implantation with those at month 1, we observed an overall decrease of 4.75 points, maintained at months 3 and 6. Nocturnal pain progressively decreased in incidence from 50.0% before implantation to 21.8%, 9.1% and 4.3% at 1, 3 and 6 months. Episodic pain was present in 90.1% of the patients before implantation (7.79 episodes/day), and at 6 months the incidence remained at 53.8%. Most of the patients (66.6%) had no complications related to therapy. We constructed a highly significant multivariate model for the efficacy of the therapy with a predictive capacity of 30.2% and composed of factors: absence of nocturnal pain before implantation and clinical improvement on day 2 after implant. Regarding the prediction of complications, it was not possible to achieve a significantly multivariate effective model. Conclusion: We identify two factors that predict therapeutic success in a multivariate model: the absence of nocturnal pain before implantation and the improvement of pain on the second day after implantation.

11.
J Spinal Cord Med ; : 1-7, 2023 Nov 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37982808

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Intrathecal baclofen (ITB) therapy is administered for severe, persistent spasticity that cannot be addressed by oral medication or other treatments. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the target dose of ITB for severe, persistent spasticity based on disease etiology. METHODS: Data at baseline (discharge), 1, and 10 years from 102 patients who received ITB therapy between 1985 and 2011 were retrospectively collected. Patients were divided based on disease etiology (cerebral, spinal, or multiple sclerosis [MS]) to evaluate differences in dose requirements. A comprehensive literature review of the dose trends in ITB therapy was conducted. RESULTS: Patients with cerebral spasticity (n = 62) required the highest dose after discharge (102.66 ± 30.9 µg), 1 (402.29 ± 300.2 µg), and 10 years (578.74 ± 421.2 µg). Patients with spinal spasticity (n = 19) required an average of 82.89 ± 30.7 µg baclofen at discharge, 296.3 ± 224.6 µg after 1 year, and 522.63 ± 425.97 µg after 10 years. Patients with MS-related spasticity (n = 21) had a dose of 82.73 ± 39.3 µg baclofen at discharge, 226.95 ± 193.3 µg after 1 year, and 320.6 ± 261.4 µg after 10 years. The differences among the categories were significant after 1 and 10 years of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The largest dose escalation occurs within the first year of ITB therapy. Our work provides a guideline for the initial dose setting during the inpatient stay after implantation and potentially expected dosage over the years thereafter, although this must always be adjusted individually.

12.
Int J Mol Sci ; 24(14)2023 Jul 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37511202

ABSTRACT

Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a devastating complication of cancer with a particularly poor prognosis. Among solid tumours, malignant melanoma (MM) has one of the highest rates of metastasis to the leptomeninges, with approximately 10-15% of patients with advanced disease developing LMD. Tumour cells that metastasise to the brain have unique properties that allow them to cross the blood-brain barrier, evade the immune system, and survive in the brain microenvironment. Metastatic colonisation is achieved through dynamic communication between metastatic cells and the tumour microenvironment, resulting in a tumour-permissive milieu. Despite advances in treatment options, the incidence of LMD appears to be increasing and current treatment modalities have a limited impact on survival. This review provides an overview of the biology of LMD, diagnosis and current treatment approaches for MM patients with LMD, and an overview of ongoing clinical trials. Despite the still limited efficacy of current therapies, there is hope that emerging treatments will improve the outcomes for patients with LMD.


Subject(s)
Melanoma , Meningeal Carcinomatosis , Meningeal Neoplasms , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Meningeal Carcinomatosis/diagnosis , Meningeal Carcinomatosis/secondary , Meningeal Carcinomatosis/therapy , Melanoma/diagnosis , Melanoma/therapy , Melanoma/secondary , Brain , Meningeal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Meningeal Neoplasms/therapy , Tumor Microenvironment , Melanoma, Cutaneous Malignant
13.
Brain Behav ; 13(1): e2851, 2023 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36545706

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Intrathecal therapy (ITT) via an implanted system was demonstrated for the treatment of refractory cancer pain for decades. Recently, the dissemination of ITT is enhanced in an external system way in Asia for a lower implantation cost. This study compares the efficacy, safety, and cost of the two ITT systems in refractory cancer pain patients in China. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-nine cancer pain patients who underwent implantation of the ITT system were included. One hundred and three patients received ITT via the external system (external group), while 36 patients received ITT via the implanted system (implanted group). A 1:2 propensity score matching procedure was used to yield a total of 89 patients for the final analysis. Medical records of included patients were retrospectively reviewed and pain scores, incidences of complications, and costs were compared. RESULTS: ITT via the external system provided pain relief as potent as ITT via the implanted system but was less time-consuming in the implantation phase (13 vs. 19 days, p < .01). Nausea/vomiting and urinary retention were the most frequent adverse events in both external and implanted groups (32.14%, 16.07% vs. 36.36%, 21.21%). No significant difference was found in the incidences of all kinds of complications. Compared to the implanted group, the external group cost less for the initial implantation (7268 vs. 26,275 US dollar [USD], p < .001) but had a significant higher maintenance cost (606.62 vs. 20.23 USD calculated monthly, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: ITT via the external system is as effective and safe as that via the implanted system and has the advantage of being cheap in the upfront implantation but costs more during the maintenance process in China.


Subject(s)
Cancer Pain , Neoplasms , Pain, Intractable , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Cancer Pain/drug therapy , Injections, Spinal/adverse effects , Pain, Intractable/drug therapy , Pain, Intractable/etiology , Pain Management/adverse effects , Pain Management/methods , Neoplasms/complications
14.
Expert Rev Med Devices ; 19(11): 895-904, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36440473

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Intrathecal therapy has been limited by non-randomized prospective studies, particularly for those suffering from non-cancer. Further, no prospective, randomized studies investigating the efficacy, safety, and utilization of intrathecal polyanalgesic consensus guidelines exist. METHODS: After IRB approval, patients were enrolled in a 1:1 fashion for intrathecal drug delivery (IDD) or conventional management (CMM), employing standard of care, excluding intrathecal drug delivery, based on the principal investigator's discretion. They were followed 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Assessments included PROMIS 29, NPRS, and PriceMonkey. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients were screened, 54 patients were enrolled: 26 to IDD and 28 to CMM. At 3 months, there was no measurable difference in pain improvement in either subgroups within the CMM for chronic pain-related syndromes (CPRS) or failed back and related spine disorders (FBRS). For the IDD, early and maintained benefit from the baseline was statistically achieved. Cost analysis of pump to CMM breakeven was 4.5 months. There were no adverse events related to compounded intrathecal medications. CONCLUSION: This is the first randomized prospective, multicenter study investigating the safety, cost, and efficacy of off-label medications for intrathecal therapy, as compared to conventional management, and suggests early detection of improvement, cost savings, safety of intrathecal compounded medication use, and safety and efficacy of employing the PACC guidance.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain , Humans , Chronic Pain/drug therapy , Prospective Studies , Drug Delivery Systems , Pain Management
15.
Neurología (Barc., Ed. impr.) ; 37(9): 794-805, noviembre 2022. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-212370

ABSTRACT

La meningitis neoplásica (MN) es una complicación metastásica relativamente frecuente en pacientes con cáncer, con alta morbilidad neurológica y en general pobre pronóstico. La prevalencia está en torno al 5-15% de los tumores sólidos, y los más frecuentes son el cáncer de mama, el de pulmón y el melanoma. La clínica se produce por afectación de hemisferios cerebrales, nervios craneales, médula y raíces nerviosas, siendo en muchos casos multifocal, y presenta a menudo síntomas y signos de hipertensión intracraneal. Las principales herramientas diagnósticas son la exploración neurológica, la resonancia magnética cerebral y medular con contraste, y el análisis y la citología del líquido cefalorraquídeo (LCR), aunque recientemente se están investigando técnicas como la detección de células tumorales y ADN circulante en el LCR, que aumentan la sensibilidad diagnóstica. Con las terapias disponibles en la actualidad el objetivo del tratamiento no es curativo, sino retrasar y disminuir los síntomas y preservar la calidad de vida de los pacientes, e implica un enfoque multimodal que puede incluir radioterapia, quimioterapia intratecal y/o sistémica y cirugía. El tratamiento debe ser individualizado y se basa principalmente en guías y opiniones de expertos. Actualmente se están llevando a cabo ensayos clínicos prometedores de fármacos contra dianas moleculares e inmunoterápicos. Este artículo es una revisión actualizada de la MN, e incluye epidemiologia, presentación clínica, diagnóstico, pronóstico, manejo y opciones terapéuticas; se dirige al neurólogo general, y en particular al neurólogo que ejerce su práctica en centros con pacientes oncológicos. (AU)


Neoplastic meningitis (NM) is a relatively frequent metastatic complication of cancer associated with high levels of neurological morbidity and generally poor prognosis. It appears in 5%-15% of patients with solid tumours, the most frequent being breast and lung cancer and melanoma. Symptoms are caused by involvement of the cerebral hemispheres, cranial nerves, spinal cord, and nerve roots, and are often multifocal or present with signs and symptoms of intracranial hypertension. The main diagnostic tools are the neurological examination, brain and spinal cord contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, and cerebrospinal fluid analysis including cytology, although studies have recently been conducted into the detection of tumour cells and DNA in the cerebrospinal fluid, which increases diagnostic sensitivity. With the currently available therapies, treatment aims not to cure the disease, but to delay and ameliorate the symptoms and to preserve quality of life. Treatment of NM involves a multimodal approach that may include radiotherapy, intrathecal and/or systemic chemotherapy, and surgery. Treatment should be individualised, and is based mainly on clinical practice guidelines and expert opinion. Promising clinical trials are currently being conducted to evaluate drugs with molecular and immunotherapeutic targets. This article is an updated review of NM epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, prognosis, management, and treatment; it is aimed at general neurologists and particularly at neurologists practicing in hospital settings with oncological patients. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Meningitis , Methotrexate , Cytarabine , Morbidity , Drug Therapy
16.
Cancer Control ; 29: 10732748221133752, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36281899

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In cancer patients with limited life expectancy, an implant of an intrathecal (IT) drug delivery system connected to a subcutaneous port (IDDS-SP) has been proposed as a successful strategy, but conflicting results are reported on quality of life (QoL). The aim of this prospective observational study is to report the effects on pain, mood and QoL of an IT combination therapy delivered by an IDDS-SP in malignant refractory pain. METHODS: Adult patients in which IT therapy was recommended were recruited. An IT therapy with morphine and levobupivacaine was started: VASPI score, depression and anxiety (evaluated by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System -ESAS-), the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), the 5-level EuroQol 5D version (EQ-5D-5L) and the requirements of breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) medications were registered, with adverse events rate and the satisfaction of patients scored as Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC). RESULTS: Fifty patients, (16 F/34 M) were enrolled (age 69 ± 12). All had advanced cancer with metastasis. The median daily VASPI score was 75, the median depression score was 6, and the median anxiety score was 4, median PSQI was 16. At 28 days, a significant reduction in VASPI score was registered as well as in depression and anxiety item. Also, PSQI decreased significantly. The EQ-5D-5 L showed a significant improvement in all components at 14 and 28 days. Patient Global Impression of Change scores showed high level of satisfaction. A low incidence of adverse events and a reduction in BTCP episodes were also registered. CONCLUSION: Intrathecal combination therapy delivered by an IDDS-SP could ensure adequate control of cancer related symptoms, such as pain, depression, anxiety and sleep disturbances. These effects, with low rate of AEs and reduced BTcP episodes, could explain the improvement in QoL and the overall high levels of patients' satisfaction.


Subject(s)
Cancer Pain , Neoplasms , Pain, Intractable , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Middle Aged , Drug Delivery Systems/adverse effects , Drug Delivery Systems/methods , Levobupivacaine/therapeutic use , Morphine/therapeutic use , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/complications , Pain, Intractable/chemically induced , Pain, Intractable/drug therapy , Quality of Life , Affect
17.
World Neurosurg ; 167: e527-e532, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35977680

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: External ventricular drainage (EVD)-related infection (ERI) represents an important condition with potential high morbidity with significant impact on patient outcomes. Prophylactic systemic antibiotics are routinely administered to patients with EVD, but they do not significantly lower the incidence of ERIs. Intraventricular treatment with vancomycin appeared to be safe and effective, but most reports are case-reports/-series and retrospective studies. METHODS: A prospective non-randomized case-control study was conducted in a consecutive series of 116 patients treated with EVD insertion. The study includes the group of patients treated with intrathecal vancomycin (Group A, 62 patients) compared with the control group treated with daily intravenous cefazolin (Group B, 54 patients). RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found between the 2 groups with regard to the duration of catheterization and occurrence of ERI during hospitalization. EVD was replaced in 16 cases (25.8%) in group A and in 12 cases (22.2%) in the control group B (P 0.67). Three cases (4.8%) of ERI have been found in group A and 5 (9.3%) in the control group (P = 0.34). All reported cases of infection in group A were caused by gram-negative agents; on the opposite, cases of infections in the control group B were caused above all by gram-positive bacteria with a statistical difference (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In this first prospective study on this topic, we found that intrathecal Vancomycin administration in EVDs does not reduce the occurrence of ERI compared with intravenous cefazolin prophylaxis, but induces selection of gram-negative bacteria.


Subject(s)
Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola , Vancomycin , Humans , Vancomycin/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Case-Control Studies , Cefazolin/therapeutic use , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/drug therapy , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/etiology , Drainage/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use
18.
J Neurooncol ; 160(1): 79-100, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35999434

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Leptomeningeal metastatic disease (LMD) from advanced malignancies has poor prognoses and limited treatments. Intrathecal therapy (ITT) protocols are available, showing variable outcomes. We reviewed the therapeutic and toxicity profiles of ITT in LMD. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Web-of-Science, and Scopus were searched following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines to include studies reporting ITT for LMD. CLINICALTRIAL: gov and Cochrane were searched to identify ongoing clinical trials. RESULTS: We included 27 published studies encompassing 2161 patients and 4 ongoing trials. LMD originated from brain metastases (85.5%), lymphomas (5.4%), high-grade gliomas (4.6%), medulloblastomas (2.3%), and leukemias (2.1%). LMD was mostly diagnosed with the co-presence of neurological-related symptoms and positive imaging and/or cerebrospinal fluid cytology (60.8%). The most common ITT agents were methotrexate (35.9%), cytarabine (21.9%), and thiotepa (8.2%), standalone or combined. Patients received a median of 6.5 ITT cycles (range, 1.0-71.0) via intraventricular (58.8%) or lumbar intrathecal (41.2%) routes. The Ommaya reservoir was implanted in 38.5% cases. Concurrent systemic chemotherapy (45.2%) and/or radiotherapy (30.6%) were used. After 1-3 cycles, 44.7% patients had improved clinical status and 29.9% converted into negative cerebrospinal fluid cytology. The most common ITT-related severe adverse events were neutropenia (6.5%), meningitis (5.2%) and encephalopathy (4.5%). Median freedom from progression was 2.4 months (range, 0.1-59.5) and median overall survival 5.5 months (range, 0.1-148.0). CONCLUSION: Current ITT protocols are variable but effective and well-tolerated in LMD. Ongoing trials are investigating dose-limiting toxicity profiles and long-term overall survival. Future studies should analyze the therapeutic and safety profiles of ITT compared to newer systemic therapies.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Meningeal Carcinomatosis , Meningeal Neoplasms , Humans , Brain Neoplasms/secondary , Combined Modality Therapy , Cytarabine , Immunotherapy , Meningeal Carcinomatosis/secondary , Meningeal Neoplasms/therapy
19.
Neurotherapeutics ; 19(6): 1782-1798, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35790709

ABSTRACT

Leptomeningeal metastases arise from cancer cell entry into the subarachnoid space, inflicting significant neurologic morbidity and mortality across a wide range of malignancies. The modern era of cancer therapeutics has seen an explosion of molecular-targeting agents and immune-mediated strategies for patients with breast, lung, and melanoma malignancies, with meaningful extracranial disease control and improvement in patient survival. However, the clinical efficacy of these agents in those with leptomeningeal metastases remains understudied, due to the relative rarity of this patient population, the investigational challenges associated with studying this dynamic disease state, and brisk disease pace. Nevertheless, retrospective studies, post hoc analyses, and small prospective trials in the last two decades provide a glimmer of hope for patients with leptomeningeal metastases, suggesting that several cancer-directed strategies are not only active in the intrathecal space but also improve survival against historical odds. The continued development of clinical trials devoted to patients with leptomeningeal metastases is critical to establish robust efficacy outcomes in this patient population, define drug pharmacokinetics in the intrathecal space, and uncover new avenues for treatment in the face of leptomeningeal therapeutic resistance.


Subject(s)
Meningeal Neoplasms , Humans , Meningeal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Meningeal Neoplasms/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
20.
Neurosurg Clin N Am ; 33(3): 305-309, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35718400

ABSTRACT

Intrathecal pumps deliver analgesic medication directly into the central nervous system. In patients with chronic nonmalignant pain, intrathecal therapy using morphine or ziconotide has been shown to be an effective option when traditional noninvasive methods do not provide adequate relief. There has been increasing use of intrathecal drug administration in the management of patients with nonmalignant pain in recent years given the advances in technology and research on the topic. However, due to its invasive nature, intrathecal pumps remain the last option among patients with chronic pain.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain , omega-Conotoxins , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Chronic Pain/drug therapy , Humans , Infusion Pumps, Implantable , Injections, Spinal , Morphine/therapeutic use , Pain Measurement
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...