Assessing the Efficacy of Tragal Pumping in a Novel Tympanostomy Tube-Rat Model.

Objective: Tragal pumping (TP) is a practice of pushing on the tragus to raise pressure within the external auditory canal and is a commonly recommended adjunctive maneuver believed to facilitate the introduction of ototopical medications into the middle ear cavity via a tympanostomy tube. To investigate the efficacy of TP in the penetration of eardrops into the middle ear cavity via tympanostomy tube, we established the novel tympanostomy tube-rat model. We investigated the histology of the middle ear to determine the efficacy in moving fluid into the middle ear. Study Design: Prospective controlled animal study. Setting: Animal laboratory in a university hospital. Methods: Ten rats were recruited, and a tympanostomy tube insertion and green dye eardrops into outer ears were performed on bilateral ears. TP was performed only on 1 ear and was not applied on the other ear in each rat. Green dye in a middle ear cavity in hematoxylin and eosin-stained temporal bone sections was evaluated by blinded experts in microscopic anatomy (staining grade) and by using Image J software (staining level). The results of these 2 methods were statistically validated. Results: The staining grade (P < .001) and the staining level (P < .001) were significantly higher in the ears which we applied TP than in the control ears. The results of 2 methods were significantly and positively correlated (r = .898, P < .001). Conclusion: Our results showed that the TP accelerate the penetration of eardrops into the middle ear cavity in the tympanostomy tube-rat model.

Therapeutic efficacy of methylprednisolone sodium succinate via diverse administration routes for mid- to high-frequency sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

BACKGROUND: Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL), characterized by a rapid and unexplained loss of hearing, particularly at moderate to high frequencies, presents a significant clinical challenge. The therapeutic use of methylprednisolone sodium succinate (MPSS) via different administration routes, in combination with conventional medications, remains a topic of interest. AIM: To compare the therapeutic efficacy of MPSS administered via different routes in combination with conventional drugs for the treatment of mid- to high-frequency SSNHL. METHODS: The medical records of 109 patients with mid- to high-frequency SSNHL were analyzed. The patients were divided into three groups based on the route of administration: Group A [intratympanic (IT) injection of MPSS combined with mecobalamin and Ginkgo biloba leaf extract injection], Group B (intravenous injection of MPSS combined with mecobalamin and Ginkgo biloba leaf extract injection), and Group C (single IT injection of MPSS). The intervention effects were compared and analyzed. RESULTS: The posttreatment auditory thresholds in Group A (21.23 ± 3 .34) were significantly lower than those in Groups B (28.52 ± 3.36) and C (30.23 ± 4.21; P < 0.05). Group A also exhibited a significantly greater speech recognition rate (92.23 ± 5.34) than Groups B and C. The disappearance time of tinnitus, time to hearing recovery, and disappearance time of vertigo in Group A were significantly shorter than those in Groups B and C (P < 0.05). The total effective rate in Group A (97.56%) was significantly greater than that in Groups B and C (77.14% and 78.79%, χ 2 = 7.898, P = 0.019). Moreover, the incidence of adverse reactions in Groups A and C was significantly lower than that in Group B (4.88%, 3.03% vs 2.57%, χ 2 = 11.443, P = 0.003), and the recurrence rate in Group A was significantly lower than that in Groups B and C (2.44% vs 20.00% vs 21.21%, χ 2 = 7.120, P = 0.028). CONCLUSION: IT injection of MPSS combined with conventional treatment demonstrates superior efficacy and safety compared to systemic administration via intravenous infusion and a single IT injection of MPSS. This approach effectively improves patients' hearing and reduces the risk of disease recurrence.

Management of Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss (ISSNHL) Intratympanic Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Versus Intratympanic Steroid Injections: A Cross-Sectional Study.

<b><br>Introduction:</b> Idiopathic sensorineural hearing loss of 30 decibels (dB) or more over at least three contiguous audiometric frequencies with an onset of less than 3 days is referred to as sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) and is known as an ENT (ear, nose, and throat) emergency. When a patient's hearing suddenly deteriorates, they become confused, anxious, and worried. One of the primary therapies for sudden sensorineural hearing loss is intratympanic steroids. Intratympanic injections of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) improve inner ear hair cells, which enhances hearing.</br> <b><br>Aim:</b> To show the safety and efficacy of intratympanic PRP injection in the management of ISSNHL in comparison with intratympanic steroid injection.</br> <b><br>Methods:</b> The study group was comprised of 100 patients who had experienced ISSNHL within 30 days with no retrocochlear pathology, as demonstrated by a negative MRI scan. 50 patients received 6 intratympanic steroid injections, while the remaining 50 patients received 2 intratympanic injections of PRP at a 1-week interval.</br> <b><br>Results:</b> A total of 39 patients with PRP injection noted an improvement in their hearing of 25 db after 2 weeks and of 30 db after 2 months, with improved speech discrimination of 26% after 2 weeks and of 28% after 2 months. 31 patients with intratympanic steroid injection noted an improvement in their hearing of 18 db after 2 weeks and of 22 db after 2 months, with improved speech discrimination of 21% after 2 weeks and of 24% after 2 months.</br> <b><br>Conclusions:</b> PRP appears safe and efficient for the treatment of ISSNHL, with a low cost and no systemic side effects, as with oral steroids. Therefore, such research should be continued.</br>.

Sound Exposure Promotes Intratympanic Drug Delivery to the Inner Ear.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of sound exposure, with the resultant windows vibration on perilymphatic concentrations following intratympanic (IT) dexamethasone and gentamicin in an animal model. STUDY DESIGN: Animal model blinded study. SETTING: Animal facility of a tertiary medical center. METHODS: Bilateral IT dexamethasone or gentamicin was applied to 15 tested rats. Following injections, each rat was exposed for 3 minutes to free field 30 dB sound pressure level (SPL), 512 vHz noise, with 1 external auditory canal plugged (contralateral control). Following noise exposure, perilymph was obtained from both ears. Drug concentrations were measured using ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometer. RESULTS: For dexamethasone, the average (±SD) perilymphatic steroidal concentration was 0.417 µg/mL (±0.549) in the control ears versus 0.487 µg/mL (±0.636) in the sound-exposed ears (P = .008). The average (±SD) gentamicin perilymphatic concentration was 8.628 µg/mL (±2.549) in the sound-exposed ears, compared to 4.930 µg/mL (±0.668) in the contralateral control (nonsound exposed) ears. Sound exposure promoted steroidal and gentamicin diffusion to the inner ear by an averaged (±SD) factor of 1.431 and 1.730 (±0.291 and 0.339), respectively. CONCLUSION: Low-intensity noise (30 dB SPL) was found to enhance dexamethasone phosphate and gentamicin diffusion to the inner ear (by an averaged factor of ∼1.4 and 1.7, respectively) in a murine model.

Easing the Burden of Tinnitus: A Narrative Review for Exploring Effective Pharmacological Strategies.

Many individuals seek medical attention for tinnitus, desiring relief from the distress caused by the condition; however, the treatment process is far from straightforward. The most effective treatments for chronic subjective tinnitus, such as tinnitus retraining therapy (TRT) and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), require considerable time and efforts. As a result, many of them express a desire for alleviation through medication. While it is true that medication is not generally recommended in treatment guidelines for chronic subjective tinnitus, in specific situations such as when accompanied by symptoms of depression or anxiety-drugs like antidepressants or anxiolytics may have a meaningful impact on symptom reduction. Additionally, medication can prove effective in certain specialized forms of tinnitus, such as typewriter tinnitus, as opposed to chronic subjective tinnitus. Although intratympanic dexamethasone injections for tinnitus have been reported to lack efficacy compared to a placebo, if patients perceive subjective satisfaction due to a placebo effect, it holds significance. From the perspective of patients suffering from tinnitus, even if the therapeutic mechanism is set aside, experiencing some degree of relief through certain medications can enhance compliance with evidence-based treatments like TRT and CBT.

Trends in Management of Ménière Disease: A TriNetX Network Database Analysis.

This study investigated management practices for Meniere's disease (MD) and their temporal trends from 2008 to 2022 within the TriNetX network database. Study cohort included adult patients (≥18 years) with the diagnosis of MD from TriNetX's multi-institutional medical records (n = 77,493). MD diagnosis and management were queried based on the international classification of diseases, tenth revision, current procedural terminology, and RXNorm codes. Temporal trends were analyzed using joinpoint regression. There was significant increase in rates of relevant medications prescribed within 12 months of MD diagnosis from 2008 to 2022 (annual percent change [APC]: 1.2 [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.4-1.9]). There were no significant changes in rate of intratympanic injection within 12 months of MD diagnosis (1.7 [95% CI: -1.1 to 4.5]). Rate of endolymphatic sac surgery and labyrinthectomy any time after MD diagnosis gradually decreased from 2008 to 2022 at APC of -8.1 (95% CI: -11.8 to -4.2) and -11.0 (95% CI: -14.0 to -7.7), respectively. Use of relevant medications has significantly increased during the early management of MD and the overall use of surgical treatments has decreased.

[Role of intratympanic glucocorticoid treatment in sudden hearing loss]. / Stellenwert der intratympanalen Glukokortikoidtherapie in der Behandlung des Hörsturzes.

Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) is one of the most common diseases in otolaryngology. Its etiology remains unknown. Furthermore, there is only a low level of evidence for the efficacy of established treatment modalities. In addition to systemic glucocorticoids, intratympanic corticosteroid treatment (ICT) has become increasingly important for treatment of ISSNHL. Different application strategies and treatment regimens have been described; however, uniform standards do not yet exist. ICT may be used for primary treatment as well as salvage therapy. Current data from meta-analyses show no benefit of intratympanic versus systemic primary therapy for sudden hearing loss (moderate evidence) but suggest a benefit of intratympanic secondary treatment over no treatment or placebo (high effect size, low evidence). Regarding combination of systemic and local glucocorticoid therapy in primary treatment of hearing loss, there may be a small benefit over systemic treatment alone (low effect size, low evidence).

Comparison of Batroxobin Versus the Combination of Batroxobin and Intratympanic Dexamethasone Injection in the Treatment of Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Introduction: Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) manifests as an abrupt decline in hearing by at least 30 dB within a 3 day period. Intratympanic dexamethasone injection (ITDI) has gained recognition as a potential treatment for SSNHL. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of combining batroxobin with ITDI (Bat and ITDI) in treating SSNHL patients and its influence on peripheral blood inflammatory indicators. Methods: SSNHL patients were retrospectively categorized into the control group (treated with Bat) and the observation group (treated with Bat and ITDI). The study involved analyzing clinical baseline data, evaluating clinical efficacy, and comparing the total effective rates among SSNHL patients with different audiometric curve types in the observation group. Routine blood tests were performed on peripheral blood samples to calculate the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and to determine C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. Adverse reactions and complications were closely monitored. Results: Following treatment, both groups displayed improvements in hearing, with the observation group exhibiting a significantly higher total effective rate (75.90%) than the control group (59.78%). For patients with 3 distinct types of sudden hearing loss (high-frequency, flat-frequency, total deafness), Bat and ITDI treatment demonstrated increased total effective rate for patients with different sudden hearing loss types (high-frequency, flat-frequency, and total deafness). Both groups experienced reduced peripheral blood CRP levels and the NLR/PLR values, with the observation group demonstrating lower values. Additionally, across the 4 audio metric subtypes, the levels of peripheral blood CRP, NLR, and PLR decreased in SSNHL patients, and the observation group had a lower incidence of adverse reactions compared to the control group. Conclusions: Bat and ITDI emerge as notably more effective for SSNHL patients, displaying potential for reducing peripheral blood inflammatory indicator levels and mitigating the incidence of adverse reactions or complications, thereby enhancing safety.

Biosafety and potency of high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid with intratympanic dexamethasone delivery for acute hearing loss.

Objective: This study evaluated the potential of high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid (HHA) as an intratympanic (IT) drug delivery vehicle for dexamethasone (D) in treating acute hearing loss. We compared the efficacy, safety, and residence time of HHA to the standard-of-care IT drug delivery method. Methods: Endoscopic examinations were used to track tympanic membrane (TM) healing post-IT injection. Micro-computed tomography (CT) was used to gauge drug/vehicle persistence in the bulla air space. Histological analyses covered the middle ear, TM, and hair cell counts. Auditory brainstem responses (ABR) were used to measure hearing thresholds, while high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was employed to quantify cochlear perilymph dexamethasone concentrations. Results: The HHA + D group had a notably prolonged drug/vehicle residence time in the bulla (41 ± 27 days) compared to the saline + D group (1.1 ± 0.3 days). Complete TM healing occurred without adverse effects. Histology revealed no significant intergroup differences or adverse outcomes. Hearing recovery trends favored the HHA + D group, with 85.0% of ears showing clinically meaningful improvement. D concentrations in cochlear perilymph were roughly double in the HHA group. Conclusion: HHA is a promising vehicle for IT drug delivery in treating acute hearing loss. It ensures extended residence time, augmented drug concentrations in targeted tissues, and safety. These results highlight the potential for HHA + D to excel beyond existing standard-of-care treatments for acute hearing loss.

Salvage therapy for refractory sudden sensorineural hearing loss (RSSNHL): a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Approximately 30-50% of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) patients show poor response to systemic steroid therapy. Additionally, the most appropriate treatment for patients with refractory sudden sensorineural hearing loss (RSSNHL) is unknown. This study aimed to explore the best treatment for RSSNHL. DESIGN: Using a frequentist contrast-based model and PRISMA guidelines, this study compared five salvage regimes: intratympanic injection of steroids (ITS), hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy, post auricle steroid injection (PSI), ITS combined with HBO therapy, and continued systemic steroids. STUDY SAMPLE: We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for randomised controlled trials and cohort studies comparing treatment regimens for RSSNHL. RESULTS: Compared with the control group (no additional treatment), PSI and ITS demonstrated significant improvements. The mean hearing gain was greater after PSI (11.1 dB [95% CI, 4.4-17.9]) than after ITS (7.7 dB [95% CI, 4.8-10.7]). When a restricted definition of RSSNHL was used, the ITS + HBO therapy showed the largest difference in improvement for pure tone average compared with the control group (14.5 dB [95% CI, 4.2-25.0]). CONCLUSIONS: The administration of either PSI or ITS leads to the greatest therapeutic effect in patients with RSSNHL. However, a consensus on the definition of RSSNHL is needed.

Enhancing the therapeutic potential of intravenous glycerol for Meniere's disease: Robust results from an extensive patient cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Meniere's disease (MD) is an idiopatic condition characterized by recurrent attacks of vertigo, hearing loss, tinnitus, and aural fullness, affecting quality of life. Intravenous glycerol has shown potential as a therapeutic option. This study evaluates its efficacy in a larger patient cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study with 168 patients having unilateral MD unresponsive to dietary restrictions. Intravenous 10 % glycerol with 0.9 % sodium chloride was administered for six months. Audio-vestibular assessments and questionnaires were used. RESULTS: Significant improvements in vertigo control observed. 7.1 % achieved complete control, and 58.3 % had substantial control. Quality of life measures improved, and audiometry thresholds remained unchanged. No major adverse events reported. DISCUSSION: Intravenous glycerol effectively controlled vertigo and improved MD patients' quality of life. Limitations include lack of a control group and a relatively short-term follow-up. Future prospects include randomized controlled trials and optimization of treatment protocols. CONCLUSION: Intravenous glycerol shows promise as a therapeutic option for MD, with notable improvements in vertigo control and quality of life. Further research is needed for validation and optimization.

Efficacy of high dose systemic versus combined (systemic and intratympanic) corticosteroid therapy in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: A prospective randomized trial and risk factor analysis.

The pathophysiology and the proper treatment of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) are an ongoing subject of debate. Locally or systemic administered corticosteroids are the most accepted drugs of treatment in reference to ISSNHL (idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss), however, no strong evidence nor guidelines regarding their effectiveness yet exists. In our prospective, randomized, controlled trial 78 participants were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned based on the day of admission to two groups according to treatment: group SS (n = 43) received intravenous systemic methylprednisolone alone, and group CT (n = 35) received intratympanic dexamethasone + systemic methylprednisolone. The primary outcome was to compare the hearing outcomes between the treatment groups based on different, widely accepted categories (Siegel, Kanzaki, modified Siegel and PTA4 gain). In consideration of the secondary outcome, we examined the effect of the various risk factors on the hearing improvement. No differences were detected regarding hearing improvement between the two groups, based on any criteria [Siegel's criteria (p = 0.604); Kanzaki's criteria (p = 0.720); modified Siegel's criteria (p = 0.524) and PTA 4 gain (p = 0.569)]. However, several clinical factors such as vertigo (p = 0.039), or cardiovascular comorbidity (p = 0.02) and the severity of initial hearing loss (p = 0.033) were found to bear a significant impact upon the hearing outcome. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first randomized controlled trial comparing high dose systemic and combination corticosteroid therapy in ISSNHL patients. Our findings suggest coexisting cardiovascular comorbidity, vertigo and severity of the initial hearing loss may bear a significantly higher impact upon hearing improvement, than the additional intratympanic steroid administration. The presented trial was registered in the European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database (name: Combinated systemic and intratympanic steroid therapy in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss, No.: 2017-000658-20) and with the ethical approval of The National Institute of Pharmacy and Nutrition (OGYÉI) (protocol No.: 7621, on 2017.02.16.).

Intratympanic Triamcinolone or Dexamethasone in Sudden Sensory Neural Hearing Loss: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) is a condition in which a person experiences a rapid loss of hearing, often in one ear. The cause of SSNHL is not always clear, but it is thought to be related to issues with the inner ear, auditory nerve, or other parts of the hearing pathway. Intratympanic injection is a treatment method for SSNHL in which a medication (corticosteroids) is injected directly into the middle ear space through the tympanic membrane. This randomized clinical trial was conducted in two hospitals in Tehran, Iran. Patients with SSNHL were randomized (using the 4-block method) and included in this study. 0.5 cc of dexamethasone or triamcinolone was injected via a 25-gauge spinal needle into the cone of light of tympanic membrane. This procedure was repeated six times. In the present study, the rate of response to treatment was compared in the two groups of triamcinolone and dexamethasone, which showed that in the group where intratympanic injection of dexamethasone was performed, 70.9% of patients responded to treatment (48.4% had a complete response and 22.5% had a partial response), and in the group receiving intratympanic triamcinolone, 72.5% responded to the treatment and improved, 50% showed a complete response and 22.5% showed a partial response, and no significant difference was found in the statistical analysis of the two groups. Also, the comparison of audiometric parameters (SDS and SRT) did not show any significant difference before and after the treatment based on the treatment group, and the treatment response was found in the same group. No significant differences were noted in terms of outcome. Intratympanic dexamethasone injection was associated with a 70.9% response and triamcinolone injection with a 72.5% response.

Intratympanic injection of hydrogel nanodrug for the prevention and treatment of sensorineural hearing loss.

Safe and efficient drug delivery to the inner ear has always been the focus of prevention and treatment of sensorineural deafness. The rapid development of nanodrug delivery systems based on hydrogel has provided a new opportunity. Among them, thermo-sensitive hydrogels promote the development of new dosage form for intratympanic injection. This smart biomaterial could transform to semisolid phase when the temperature increased. Thermo-sensitive hydrogel nanodrug delivery system is expected to achieve safe, efficient, and sustained inner ear drug administration. This article introduces the key techniques and the latest progress in this field.

The impact of labyrinthine magnetic resonance signal alterations on the treatment of sudden sensory-neural hearing loss.

BACKGROUND: Sudden sensory-neural hearing loss (SSNHL), with positive findings on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), possibly related to labyrinthine hemorrhage, is a rare condition and difficult to be diagnosed. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the role of MRI in detecting labyrinthine signal changes and the impact of these changes on the prognosis of SSNHL after the intratympanic corticosteroid injection. METHODS: A prospective study was held between January and June 2022. We included patients who complained of SSNHL, either idiopathic (30 patients) or labyrinthine signal alterations (14 patients), as diagnosed by MRI performed 15 days after the SSNHL onset. In addition, all patients underwent a course of intratympanic prednisolone injections. RESULTS: 83.3% of the idiopathic group showed a complete or marked improvement after the intratympanic injection. Conversely, most cases of positive MR signal alterations (92.8%) had slight or poor improvement after the therapeutic course. CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed that MRI imaging is essential for assessing any SSNHL case. It can diagnose labyrinthine hemorrhage, whose course and prognosis differ significantly from idiopathic SSNHL. SIGNIFICANCE: Intratympanic prednisolone injection was effective in managing idiopathic SSNHL. On the other hand, this therapeutic modality was ineffective in improving SSNHL associated with labyrinthine hemorrhage.

Injectable Poloxamer Hydrogel Formulations for Intratympanic Delivery of Dexamethasone.

BACKGROUND: In this study, we prepared and evaluated an injectable poloxamer (P407) hydrogel formulation for intratympanic (IT) delivery of dexamethasone (DEX). METHODS: DEX-loaded P407 hydrogels were characterized in terms of thermogelation, drug loading capacities, particle size, and drug release. The in vivo toxicity and drug absorption of the DEX-loaded P407 formulation after IT injection were evaluated using an animal model by performing histopathological analysis and drug concentration measurements. RESULTS: The P407 hydrogel effectively solubilized hydrophobic DEX and demonstrated a sustained release compared to the hydrophilic DEX formulation. The in vivo study showed that the hydrogel formulation delivered considerable drug concentrations to the inner ear and displayed a favorable safety profile without apparent cytotoxicity or inflammation. CONCLUSION: P407 hydrogel can be useful as an injectable inner ear delivery formulation for hydrophobic drugs due to their biocompatibility, drug-solubilizing capacity, thermogelation, and controlled release.

Evaluation of Sudden Sensory-Neural Hearing Loss Patients Treated with Systemic Steroids with Additional Intratympanic Dexamethasone Injection in Different Intervals; a Clinical Trial Study.

Sudden Sensory-Neural Hearing Loss (SSNHL) is one of the most important otologic emergency. Although adding intratympanic (IT) steroids to systematic steroid may be beneficial, the exact timing of the IT injections to provide the best response needs further investigations. To compare different protocols in treting sudden sensorineural hearing loss. We performed a clinical trial study on 120 patients from October 2021 to February 2022. All patients were prescribed 1 mg/Kg daily oral prednisolone. After randomization to three groups, the control group received standard twice a week IT steroid injections in 12 days (four total injections) while intervention groups 1 and 2 received once and twice a day IT injections for ten days. Audiometric study repeated 10-14 days after the last injection and assessed based on the Siegel criteria. We used the Chi-Square, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), Kruskal-Wallis's tests where appropriate. The most clinical improvement was found in the standard treatment group, and group-2 had the greatest number of patients with no improvement; however, no overall significant difference was observed among the three groups (p-value: 0.066; Pearson Chi-Square). Less frequent IT injections in patients already on systemic steroids provide similar results to more frequent injections. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-023-03641-4.

Efficacy of intratympanic or postauricular subperiosteal corticosteroid injection combined with systemic corticosteroid in the treatment of sudden sensorineural hearing loss: A prospective randomized study.

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of intratympanic or postauricular subperiosteal glucocorticoid injection combined with systemic glucocorticoid in the treatment of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL). Methods: This study is a prospective randomized controlled study. This study included unilateral SSNHL patients who were hospitalized in our department between January 2020 and June 2021. Patients were randomly divided into three groups (groups A, B, and C). Patients in group A were treated with an intratympanic corticosteroid injection combined with systemic corticosteroid treatment, and patients in group B received a postauricular corticosteroid injection combined with systemic corticosteroid treatment. Patients in group C (control group) were treated with systemic corticosteroid alone. The case number of groups A, B, and C was 311, 375, and 369, respectively. Results: There was no significant difference in gender distribution, the proportion of left and right affected ears, and the average interval from onset to treatment among the three groups (P > 0.05). However, there were significant differences in their average age, distribution of audiogram type, and hearing loss levels among them (P < 0.01). Our study shows that there was no significant difference in average hearing threshold improvement before and after treatment in the three groups (P > 0.05). Regarding the complications, in group A, 33 patients (10.6%) had a transient vertigo attack during tympanic injection, which lasted for ~1-3 min. In group B, 20 patients (6.43%) complained of pain at the injection site, which disappeared after 1-3 days. No other complications occurred in all the other patients. Conclusion: The addition of intratympanic or postauricular corticosteroid to systemic steroids did not result in a significant effect on hearing recovery in SSNHL. No obvious complications occur in SSNHL patients treated with intratympanic injection or postauricular injection of corticosteroid. Clinical trial registration: [chictr.org.cn], registration number: ChiCTR2100048762.

Local vs Systemic Use of Steroids for Sudden Deafness with Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes is associated with a risk of idiopathic sudden deafness. The main treatment of diabetic sudden deafness is systemic and topical application of steroids. Topical steroid therapy reduces systemic adverse reactions compared with systemic therapy. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis design on the improvement value and recovery rate of pure tone mean hearing threshold (PTA).To investigate whether there is difference between local and systemic steroid treatment as the initial treatment for sudden deafness patients with diabetes. METHODS: We searched databases from publication date to October 1, 2022 including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, web of science, CNKI, Wan fang Database, China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), and VIP information resource system. A systematic literature review was conducted on the efficacy and safety of local and systemic steroid therapy for diabetic sudden deafness. RevMan5.4 and stata14 software were used for Meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 23 studies were included in this study, covering 1777 patients, including 885 cases in the observation group (local steroid group) and 894 cases in the control group (systemic steroid group). Meta-analysis showed that there was a significant difference in the total effective rate of local and systemic steroid treatment for diabetic sudden deafness between groups (RR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.11-1.22, P < 0.05). The effective rate in the observation group was higher than that in the control group. For the improvement of PTA, the difference between groups was statistically significant (RR = 6.60, 95% CI = 3.07-10.14, P < 0.05). The improvement of PTA in the local steroid group was higher than that in the systemic steroid group. Subgroup analysis showed that there were significant differences between groups in hormones, drug administration, follow-up time and course of disease. CONCLUSION: Topical steroid therapy is effective in the treatment of diabetic sudden deafness. Hormone methylprednisolone has high effective rate; the shorter the course of disease and the longer the follow-up time are, the higher the total effective rate will be. Tympanic injection is more effective than post-aural injection. Topical steroid injections are safer for hormonal side effect.

The Optimized Protocol of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy For Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the optimal protocol of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) according to various treatment settings for sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL). METHODS: A 112 patients with SSNHL were enrolled in this prospective study. All patients were treated with systemic steroid therapy, intratympanic steroid therapy, and HBOT. According to the pressure and duration of HBOT (10 sessions in total), the patients were divided into three groups: group 1, 2.5 atmospheres absolute (ATA) for 1 h; group 2, 2.5 ATA for 2 h; and group 3, 1.5 ATA for 1 h. The pure-tone average (PTA), word discrimination score (WDS), and mean gain were compared. RESULTS: A total of 105 patients completed the 3-month follow-up, and 6 patients were excluded. Differences among groups were found in PTA, WDS, and mean gain. In the post-hoc analysis, group 3 had significantly lower WDS and mean gain than groups 1 and 2; however, group 2 showed no significant differences from group 1. The proportion of patients with hearing recovery after treatment was significantly higher in group 1 (57.6%) and group 2 (58.8%) than in group 3 (31.3%). CONCLUSIONS: When HBOT (10 sessions) was combined with corticosteroids as the initial therapy for SSNHL, a higher pressure (1.5 ATA vs. 2.5 ATA) provided better treatment results; however, increasing the duration (1 h vs. 2 h) under 2.5 ATA did not result in a significant difference. Therefore, HBOT for SSNHL may be performed at 2.5 ATA for 1 h in 10 sessions. Laryngoscope, 133:383-388, 2023.