Comparison of Analgesic Effects and Adverse Events of Hydromorphone PCIA Versus Sufentanil PCIA: A Retrospective Analysis.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the analgesic effect and adverse events of hydromorphone patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) without background dose versus sufentanil PCIA with background dose in patients after surgery. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis. METHODS: From June 2020 to May 2021, 1,594 eligible postoperative patients who received PCIA were included in this study. According to the types of opioids, patients were divided into two groups: the sufentanil group and the hydromorphone group. The Numerical Rating Scale, Functional Activity Scale, and Level of Sedation were used to evaluate the analgesic effects between the two groups. In addition, total patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) use, effective number of PCA compressions, and adverse effects of PCIA were compared between the two groups. FINDINGS: At 24 hours (h) after surgery, the Functional Activity Scale score in the sufentanil group was higher than that in the hydromorphone group (P < .05). Compared with the sufentanil group, total PCA use, total number of PCA compressions and effective number of PCA consumptions were significantly decreased in the hydromorphone group during a 48 hours period (P < .05). There were no statistical differences in Numerical Rating Scale score, Level of Sedation score, and adverse events between two groups at 24 hours and 48 hours after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with sufentanil PCIA with a background dose, under a similar analgesic effect, hydromorphone PCIA without a background dose provided lower PCA use. Our findings may provide useful evidence for more future studies related to postoperative analgesia.

[Application of superior iliac fascia block of inguinal ligament combined with patient controlled intravenous analgesia in elderly patients after hip arthroplasty].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia(PCIA) and superior inguinal ligament iliac fascia block combined with PCIA after hip replacement in the elderly. METHODS: Total of 82 elderly patients were treated with hip arthroplasty from June 2019 to June 2021 and randomly divided into observation group and control group. There were 42 patients in control group, including 18 males and 24 females, aged from 60 to 78 years old with an average of (70.43±3.67) years old, 28 femoral neck fractures and 14 femoral head necrosis, who received PCIA. The study group consisted of 42 cases, including 20 males and 22 females, aged from 61 to 76 years old with an average of (69.68±3.74) years old, 25 femoral neck fractures and 17 femoral head necrosis, who received superior inguinal ligament iliac fascia block combined with PCIA. Pain visual analogue scale (VAS) and Ramesay sedation scores at 2 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h and 48 h after operation were evaluated. In addition, the follow-up results of the total consumption of sufentanil and the total number of PCIA compressions at 48 hours after operation, the first time of landing after surgery, the time of hospital stay, the incidence of adverse reactions, the satisfaction with analgesia of two groups were observed. RESULTS: All patients were followed up for 9 to 24 months with an average of(13.85±2.67) months. There was no significant difference in operation time and intraoperative bleeding between two groups (P>0.05). There was no difference in VAS between two groups at 2 hours after operation (P>0.05), and the VAS of the study group at 6 h, 12 h, 24 h and 48 h after operation were lower than those of the control group(P<0.05). The Ramesay sedation scores of the study group at 2 h, 6 h and 12 h after operation were higher than those of the control group(P<0.05), and there were no differences in Ramesay score between two groups at 24 h and 48 h after operation (P>0.05). The consumption of sufentanil in the study group within 48 hours after operation was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05), and PCIA compression times were lower than those in the control group(P<0.05), and the time of first landing was earlier than that in the control group(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in hospital stay, adverse reaction rate, complications between two groups (P>0.05). The satisfaction of analgesia in the study group was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Superior iliac fascia block of inguinal ligament combined with PCIA has significant analgesic and sedative effects after hip arthroplasty in the elderly. It can reduce the amount of sufentanil used and the total number of PCIA compressions, which is conducive to the early activity of patients out of bed, improve the satisfaction of analgesia.

Letter to the Editor Regarding "Effect of Ropivacaine Intercostal Nerve Block Combined with Patient Controlled Intravenous Analgesia on Postoperative Analgesia After Breast Augmentation".

We read the recently published article "Effect of Ropivacaine Intercostal Nerve Block Combined with Patient Controlled Intravenous Analgesia on Postoperative Analgesia after Breast Augmentation" by You et al. We have noticed several issues in the methods and results of this study and would appreciate the responses from the authors. We question several aspects, opioid-sparing effect, sufentanil consumption, sample size evaluation, exclusion reasons, and side effects.

Optimizing patient outcomes: the impact of multimodal preemptive analgesia in video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a multimodal preemptive analgesia management approach, specifically incorporating ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block (UG-TPVB) in conjunction with intravenous analgesia, after video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) lobectomy under the guidance of enhanced recovery after surgery. METHODS: A total of 690 patients who underwent VATS lobectomy between October 2021 and March 2022 were divided into the UG-TPVB group (group T, n = 345) and the control group (group C, n = 345). Patients in group T received UG-TPVB prior to the induction of general anaesthesia, while group C did not undergo nerve block. A comparison was conducted between the 2 groups regarding various indicators, including postoperative sedation, static/dynamic numeric rating scale scores, intraoperative fentanyl consumption, duration of mechanical ventilation/anaesthesia recovery/hospitalization, postoperative complications and other relevant factors. RESULTS: The static/dynamic numeric rating scale scores of group T were lower than those of group C after surgery. Intraoperative fentanyl consumption in group T (0.384 ± 0.095 mg) was lower than that in group C (0.465 ± 0.053 mg). The duration of mechanical ventilation, anaesthesia recovery and hospitalization were significantly shorter in group T compared to group C. Patient satisfaction rate in group T (70.1%) was higher than that in group C (53.6%). All differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The multimodal preemptive analgesia management strategy effectively reduces postoperative pain, decreases opioid consumption and promotes faster recovery in patients undergoing VATS lobectomy.

Effect of Intermittent Thoracic Paravertebral Block on Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Following Thoracoscopic Radical Resection of the Lung Cancer: A Prospective Randomized Trial.

Purpose: To explore the benefits of ultrasound-guided intermittent thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) combined with intravenous analgesia (PCIA) in alleviating postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) during video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). Patients and Methods: 120 patients with lung carcinoma undergoing VATS were included and divided into three groups: group S (single TPVB+PCIA), group I (intermittent TPVB+PCIA), and group P (PCIA). The patients' NRS scores, postoperative hydromorphone hydrochloride consumption, and intramuscular injection of bucinnazine hydrochloride were recorded. The incidence of PONV and complications were documented. Results: Compared with the group P, both group I and group S had significantly lower static NRS scores from 1-48 hours after the operation (P <0.05), and the dynamic NRS score of group I at the 1-48 hours after the operation were significantly decreased (P <0.05). Compared with the group P, the proportion of patients with PONV in group I was significantly lower (P <0.05), while there was no significant difference in group S. Moreover, the hospitalization period of patients in group I was significantly reduced compared with the other two groups (P <0.01), and the patient satisfaction was significantly increased compared with the group P (P <0.05). Conclusion: Intermittent TPVB combined with PCIA can reduce the postoperative pain and the occurrence of PONV.

Impact of the addition of dexmedetomidine to patient-controlled intravenous analgesia on postoperative pain-sleep interaction cycle and delirium: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Background: The reciprocal nexus between sleep and pain is well-documented, with the deleterious impact of operative trauma potentially playing a pivotal role in the dysregulation of this interplay, which could significantly contribute to the manifestation of postoperative delirium (POD). Studies have investigated the effect of adding dexmedetomidine (DEX) to patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) pumps on postoperative pain-sleep interaction cycle and POD, but conclusions remained uncertain. The objective of this investigation is to perform a meta-analysis that thoroughly assesses the impact of integrating DEX into PCIA, focusing on analgesic effectiveness, sleep quality, and the incidence of delirium in postoperative patients. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, SinoMed, and Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform were searched, for publications in any language, from database inception to September 2023. Our analysis encompassed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examine the therapeutic efficacy and risk profile of adding DEX to the PCIA on the postoperative pain-sleep interaction cycle, by focusing on changes in postoperative analgesia (Visual analog scale (VAS) score), sleep efficiency, sleep structure, subjective sleep score (Assen insomnia scale and numerical rating scale) and adverse event rate. Results: 34 RCTs (4324 patients) were analyzed. This study shows DEX improved analgesia and reduced VAS scores at 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery. Sleep efficiency was enhanced on the 1st and 2nd postoperative night. DEX improved sleep structure at the 1st postoperative night by reducing non-rapid eye movement stage 1 (N1) sleep and increasing non-rapid eye movement stage 2 (N2) and non-rapid eye movement stage 3 (N3) sleep. At the 2nd night, DEX reduced N1 sleep and increased N2 sleep, but not N3 sleep. Data from AIS and NRS showed improvement in subjective sleep scores on the 1st postoperative night and 2nd night. Additionally, DEX decreased the occurrence of POD on the 24 h and first-three days. Conclusion: This study shows that the typical DEX doses added to PCIA with sufentanil were 2-5 µg/kg or approximately 200-250 µg, and the addition of DEX to PCIA can improve pain-sleep interaction cycle from multiple perspectives, and further decrease the occurrence of POD.

Transcranial direct current stimulation efficacy in trigeminal neuralgia.

Trigeminal neuralgia is a severe, disabling pain and its deafferentation remains a challenge for health providers. Transcranial direct current stimulation is a non-invasive stimulation technique which finds new utility in managing pain. Therefore, the introduction of alternative, non-invasive, safe, and effective methods should be considered in treating patients with trigeminal neuralgia unresponsive to conventional treatment.

Efficacy of esketamine for the treatment of postpartum depression and pain control following cesarean section: a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Postpartum depression (PPD) following a cesarean delivery is a frequently seen complication. Despite the prophylactic effects of ketamine, the impact of esketamine on PPD in women undergoing cesarean section remains uncertain. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of esketamine as an adjunct to patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) in preventing PPD in women undergoing caesarean section. METHODS: A total of 275 parturients undergoing caesarean section and subsequent patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) were randomly assigned to receive either the control treatment (sufentanil 2 µg/kg + tropisetron 10 mg) or the experimental treatment with additional esketamine (1.5 mg/kg). The primary outcome measured was the incidence of postpartum depression (PPD), classified by Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) scores equal to or greater than 13 indicating PPD. Secondary outcomes included cumulative sufentanil consumption during specific time periods (0-24 h, 24-48 h, and 0-48 h) after the surgical procedure and numerical rating scale (NRS) scores at rest and during movements. RESULTS: The final analysis included a total of 246 postpartum women who had undergone caesarean delivery. On postoperative day 42, the incidence of depression among the control group was 17.6%, which was significantly higher compared to the esketamine group with a rate of 8.2% (P = 0.02). The EPDS scores also showed a significant difference between the two groups, with a mean score of 9.02 ± 2.21 in the control group and 6.87 ± 2.14 in the esketamine group (p < 0.0001). In terms of pain management, the esketamine group showed lower sufentanil consumption in the 0-24 h (42.5 ± 4.58 µg vs. 50.15 ± 5.47 µg, P = 0.04) and 0-48 h (87.40 ± 9.51 µg vs. 95.10 ± 9.36 µg, P = 0.04) postoperative periods compared to the control group. Differences in movement were also observed between the two groups at 24 and 48 h after the cesarean Sect. (3.39 ± 1.57 vs. 4.50 ± 0.80, P = 0.02; 2.43 ± 0.87 vs. 3.56 ± 0.76, P = 0.02). It is worth noting that the frequency of side effects observed in both groups was comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Esketamine at a dose of 1.5 mg/kg, when used as a supplement in PCIA, has been shown to significantly reduce the occurrence of PPD within 42 days. Additionally, it has been found to decrease cumulative consumption of sufentanil over a 48-hour period following cesarean operation, all without increasing the rate of adverse effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200067054) on December 26, 2022.

Esketamine combined with sufentanil versus sufentanil in patient-controlled intravenous analgesia: a meta-analysis.

Objective: Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) can alleviate pain to some extent, and several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have examined the efficacy of esketamine-assisted sufentanil in postoperative PCIA. In this research, we conducted a meta-analysis of relevant RCTs to compare the effect and safety of esketamine-sufentanil versus sufentanil alone for postoperative PCIA. Methods: We systematically searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, and other libraries up to December 2023 to screen out RCTs examining the use of esketamine combined with sufentanil for PCIA. We analysed analgesia scores, sedation scores, adverse drug reactions and postpartum depression scores as outcome indicators. Results: This meta-analysis included 32 RCTs. The results of the meta-analysis were as follows. 1) Visual Analog Scale: The VAS scores at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h were lower in the esketamine-sufentanil group than in the sufentanil alone group, and significant differences were found at all time points (p < 0.05). 2) Ramsay Sedation Scale: The sedation score of the esketamine-sufentanil group at 48 h after surgery was higher than that of the sufentanil group alone [mean difference (MD) = -0.09 points, confidence interval (CI): (-0.26, -0.07), p = 0.27], but this difference was not significant (p > 0.05). 3) Safety: Compared with sufentanil alone, the incidence rates of postoperative nausea-vomiting, dizziness-headache, skin pruritus and respiratory depression were significantly lower in the esketamine-sufentanil group. 4) Postartum depression: The reduction in postpartum depression scores were significantly greater in the esketamine-sufentanil group than in the sufentanil alone group at 3 days [MD = -1.35 points, CI: (-1.89, -0.81), p < 0.00001] and 7 days [MD = -1.29 points, CI: (-2.42, -0.16), p = 0.03]. Conclusion: The meta-analysis showed that the use of esketamine combined with sufentanil for postoperative PCIA could improve postoperative analgesia, alleviate postpartum depression and reduce the rate of postoperative adverse reactions, but there was no significant difference in sedation.

Application of Butorphanol versus Sufentanil in Multimode Analgesia via Patient Controlled Intravenous Analgesia After Hepatobiliary Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Purpose: We investigate the efficacy and safety of butorphanol in multimodal analgesia combined with dexmedetomidine and ketorolac via patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) after hepatobiliary surgery, as compared with sufentanil. Patients and Methods: Postoperative follow-up data of hepatobiliary surgery patients in Henan Provincial People's Hospital from March 2018 to June 2021 were collected retrospectively and divided into butorphanol group (group B) or sufentanil group (group S) according to the postoperative intravenous controlled analgesia scheme. The baseline characteristics and surgical information of the two groups were matched through propensity score matching (PSM). Results: A total of 3437 patients were screened, and PSM yielded 1816 patients after matching, including 908 in the butorphanol group and 908 in the sufentanil group. Compared with group S, the incidence of moderate-to-severe pain on the first postoperative day and the second postoperative day was lower in group B during rest (3.2% vs 10.9%, P<0.001; 1.2% vs 4.6%, P<0.001), and during movement (7.0% vs 18.9%, P<0.001; 2.6% vs 8.7%, P<0.001). Patients receiving butorphanol had a lower morphine consumption (50mg vs 120mg, P<0.001). The bolus attempts of an analgesic pump in group B were significantly lower than in group S (1 vs 2, P<0.001). Postoperative hospital length of stay was shortened in group B (11d vs 12d, P=0.017). The occurrence of postoperative vomiting was lower in group B (1.4% vs 3.0%, P=0.025) than in group S. However, more patients in group B experienced dizziness (0.9% vs 0.1%, P=0.019). Conclusion: Compared with sufentanil, the application of butorphanol in multimodal analgesia combined with dexmedetomidine and ketorolac via PCIA ameliorated postoperative pain after hepatobiliary surgery, with reduced opioid consumption and shorter postoperative hospital length of stay.

Analgesic Effect of Esketamine Combined with Tramadol for Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia After Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Purpose: High rate of cesarean section (CS) bring challenges to analgesic management after CS. Previous studies state that adjuvant treatment with a low dose of esketamine intraoperatively could reduce postoperative pain and opioid consumption, and even prevent postpartum depression. However, few researches involve in patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) with esketamine after CS. In this trial, we explored a new combination of esketamine with tramadol for PCIA after CS with the aim to provide a better analgesic regimen for use in the clinic. Patients and Methods: 170 puerperae undergoing CS were recruited for this trial and randomly assigned into 2 groups (1:1): The control group received a formula of PCIA with butorphanol 0.1mg/kg and tramadol 400mg postoperatively, while the intervention group received a formula of PCIA with esketamine 1mg/kg and tramadol 400mg. The primary outcome was the mean numerical rating scale (NRS) scores at rest, sitting, and uterine contraction at 6 hours postoperatively. The second outcomes included the mean NRS scores at rest, sitting, and uterine contraction at 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively. The incidence of adverse events, postoperative sedation, postoperative sleep quality, maternal satisfaction regarding postoperative analgesia and the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS) score were also be evaluated. Results: The mean (SD) of the mean NRS scores at rest, sitting, and during uterine contraction at 6 hours postoperatively were 4.8 (0.7) points in the intervention group and 5.3 (0.5) points in the control group. The estimated mean difference between the two groups at 6 hours postoperatively was -0.5 points (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.7 to -0.3; P < 0.001). Compared with the control group, the patients in the intervention group had a significantly lower mean pain intensity at 12 and 24 hours postoperatively (-0.5 points [95% CI, -0.6 to -0.3]; P < 0.001 and -0.2 points [95% CI, -0.4 to 0]; P = 0.019 respectively). Otherwise, differences at 48 hours after surgery between the two groups were nonsignificant (0 points [95% CI, -0.2 to 0.2]; P = 0.802). The incidence of adverse events in the intervention group (11.8%) was significantly lower than in the control group (24.7%) (ratio difference -12.9, [95% CI, -24.3 to -1.5]; P = 0.029). No difference was found in postoperative sleep quality (P = 0.765), analgesic satisfaction (P= 0.818) and EPDS scores (P = 0.154) between the two groups. Conclusion: In this trial, among patients undergoing CS, esketamine combined with tramadol by PCIA improved pain intensity 6 hours postoperatively compared with butorphanol combined with tramadol.

Pain in High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

High-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR) is part of the main treatment for locally advanced uterine cervical cancer. Our aim was to evaluate the incidence and intensity of pain and patients' satisfaction during HDR. Risk factors for suffering pain were also analyzed. A retrospective study was carried out by extracting data from patients who had received HDR treatment for five years. Postoperative analgesia had been administered using pre-established analgesic protocols for 48 h. Pain assessment was collected according to a protocol by the acute pain unit. Analgesic assessment was compared according to analgesic protocol administered, number of needles implanted, and type of anesthesia performed during the procedure. From 172 patients treated, data from 247 treatments were analyzed. Pain was considered moderate in 18.2% of the patients, and 43.3% of the patients required at least one analgesic rescue. Patients receiving major opioids reported worse pain control. No differences were found regarding the analgesic management according to the intraprocedural anesthesia used or the patients' characteristics. The number of inserted needles did not influence the postoperative analgesic assessment. Continuous intravenous infusion of tramadol and metamizole made peri-procedural pain during HDR mild in most cases. Many patients still suffered from moderate pain.

Efficacy and safety of patient-controlled thoracic epidural analgesia alone versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with acetaminophen after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic gastrectomy is a common procedure for early gastric cancer treatment. Improving postoperative pain control enhances patient recovery after surgery. The use of multimodal analgesia can potentially enhance the analgesic effect, minimize side effects, and change the postoperative management. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the efficacies of the use of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with regular acetaminophen (PCIA + Ace) and patient-controlled thoracic epidural analgesia (PCEA) for postoperative pain control. METHODS: We retrospectively collected the data of 226 patients who underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) with delta-shaped anastomosis between 2016 and 2019. After 1:1 propensity-score matching, we compared 83 patients who used PCEA alone (PCEA group) with 83 patients who used PCIA + Ace (PCIA + Ace group). Postoperative pain was assessed using a numeric rating scale (NRS) with scores ranging from 0 to 10. An NRS score ≥ 4 was considered the threshold for additional intravenous rescue medication administration. RESULTS: Although NRS scores at rest were comparable between the PCEA and PCIA + Ace groups, NRS scores of patients in the PCIA + Ace group during coughing or movement were significantly better than those of patients in the PCEA group on postoperative days 2 and 3. The frequency of additional rescue analgesic use was significantly lower in the PCIA + Ace group than in the PCEA group (1.1 vs. 2.7, respectively, p < 0.001). The rate of reduction or interruption of the patient-controlled analgesic dose was higher in the PCEA group than in the PCIA + Ace group (74.6% vs. 95.1%, respectively, p = 0.0002), mainly due to hypotension occurrence in the PCEA group. Physical recovery time, postoperative complication occurrence, and liver enzyme elevation incidence were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: PCIA + Ace can be safely applied without an increase in complications or deterioration in gastrointestinal function; moreover, PCIA + Ace use may provide better pain control than PCEA use in patients following LDG.

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: comparison of subarachnoid analgesia, erector spine plane block, and intravenous analgesia for postoperative pain management.

Background: Laparoscopic and robotic prostatectomy allows a higher precision and a magnified view of the surgical field but it did not show to be characterized by a lower pain compared to open surgery so the management of postoperative pain still remains an important issue. Methods: We enrolled 60 patients randomized in 1:1:1 ratio into three groups: group SUB: treated with a lumbar subarachnoid injection of 10.5 mg ropivacaine, 30 µg clonidine, 2 µg/kg morphine, and 0.03 µg/kg sufentanil; groups ESP: treated with a bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) block with 30 µg clonidine, 4 mg dexamethasone, 100 mg ropivacaine; group IV: treated with 10 mg morphine intramuscular 30 minutes before the end of the surgery and a postoperative iv continuous infusion of 0.625 mg/hr morphine in the first 48 hours after the intervention. Results: Numeric rating scale score in the first 12 hours after intervention was significantly lower in SUB group compared to both IV group and ESP group with a maximum difference at 3 hours after intervention (0.14±0.35 vs 2.05±1.10, P <0.001 and 0.14±0.35 vs 1.15±0.93, P <0.001, respectively). Intraoperative supplemental doses of sufentanil were not required by SUB group, whereas IV and ESP groups required an additional dose of 24±10.7 µg and 7.5±5.5 µg, respectively (P <0.001). Conclusions: Subarachnoid analgesia is an effective strategy to manage postoperative pain in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy; it allows to reduce both intraoperative and postoperative opioid consumption and the amount of inhalation anesthetics compared to intravenous analgesia. ESP block might be an effective alternative in patients with contraindications to subarachnoid analgesia.

Efficacy of Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia with Esketamine for Herpes Zoster Associated with Breakthrough Pain.

BACKGROUND: Some patients with herpes zoster (HZ) experience an intermittent spontaneous, short-lived and severe pain, which is called breakthrough pain (BTP). The effect of analgesic drugs and invasive procedures is not significant. Therefore, treatment of HZ associated with BTP is challenging. Esketamine is a new N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, with enhanced analgesic effects. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and adverse reactions of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) with low-dose esketamine for HZ associated with BTP. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and adverse reactions of PCIA with low-dose esketamine for HZ associated with BTP. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective, observational study. SETTING: The study was carried out in the Pain Department of the Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University in Jiaxing, China. METHODS: The clinical data of HZ associated with BTP treated by PCIA with low-dose esketamine at the Pain Department of the Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, between October 2015 to October 2021, were collected retrospectively. The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) scores of rest pain (RP) and BTP, frequency of BTP, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) score, and fasting blood glucose (FBG) were recorded and analyzed before treatment (T0) and on days one (T1) and 3 (T2), week one (T3), months one (T4), 3 (T5), and 6 (T6) after treatment. Adverse reactions during the treatment were recorded. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients treated by PCIA with low-dose esketamine were included finally. Compared with T0, the NRS-11 scores of RP at T2, T3, T4, T5, and T6 decreased significantly (P < 0.05). The NRS-11 score of RP at T4 was significantly lower than that of T3 (P < 0.001), but there was no statistical difference between T5 and T4 (P > 0.05), the efficacy of esketamine in the treatment of RP was stable at one month after treatment. Likewise, compared with T0, the NRS-11 scores of BTP, frequency of BTP, and PSQI score decreased significantly at each time point after treatment (P < 0.05). These at T5 were significantly lower than T4 (P < 0.05), but there was no statistical difference between T6 and T5 (P > 0.05), the efficacy of esketamine was stable at 3 months after treatment. FBG also decreased significantly at each time point after treatment (P < 0.05), it tended to be normal and stable one month after treatment. All patients had mild symptoms of dizziness during treatment, and though a slight increase in noninvasive blood pressure (BP) was noted in all, the elevated BP did not exceed 30% of the baseline value. Four patients (16%) developed nausea without vomiting. There were no serious adverse reactions, such as respiratory depression. LIMITATIONS: The nonrandomized, single-center, small sample size, retrospective design is a major limitation of this study. CONCLUSIONS: PCIA with low-dose esketamine has a significant and long-term effect in the treatment of HZ associated with BTP. The RP was controlled, and the degree and frequency of BTP were significantly reduced after treatment, leading to improved quality of life. There were no serious adverse reactions worthy of clinical promotion.

Oxycodone vs. tramadol in postoperative parent-controlled intravenous analgesia in children: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, multiple-center clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Management of acute postoperative pain is one of the major challenges in pediatric patients. Oral oxycodone has shown good pain relief in postoperative pain relief in children, but no studies have investigated intravenous oxycodone in this context. OBJECTIVE: whether oxycodone PCIA can provide adequate and safe postoperative pain relief, in comparison to tramadol as reference opioid drug. DESIGN: a randomized, double-blind, parallel, multi-center clinical trial. SETTING: five university medical centers and three teaching hospitals in China. PARTICIPANTS: patients aged 3-month-old to 6-year-old undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia. INTERVENTION: patients were randomly allocated to either tramadol (n = 109) or oxycodone (n = 89) as main postoperative opioid analgesic. Tramadol or oxycodone were administered with a loading dose at the end of surgery (1 or 0.1 mg.kg-1, respectively), then with a parent-controlled intravenous device with fixed bolus doses only (0.5 or 0.05 mg.kg-1, respectively), and a 10-min lockout time. OUTCOMES: the primary outcome was adequate postoperative pain relief, defined as a face, legs, activity, cry, and consolability (FLACC) score < 4/10 in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), with no need for an alternative rescue analgesia. FLACC was measured 10 min after extubation then every 10 min until discharge from PACU. Analgesia was currently conducted with the boluses of either tramadol or oxycodone if FLACC was ≥ 3, up to three bolus doses, after what rescue alternative analgesia was administered. RESULTS: tramadol and oxycodone provided a similar level of adequate postoperative pain relief in PACU and in the wards. No significant differences were either noted for the raw FLACC scores, the bolus dose demand in PACU, the time between the first bolus dose and discharge from PACU, analgesic drug consumption, bolus times required in the wards, function activity score, or the parents' satisfaction. The main observed side effects in both groups were nausea and vomiting, with no difference between groups. However, patients in the oxycodone group showed less sedation levels and had a shorter stay in the PACU, compared with the tramadol group. CONCLUSIONS: an adequate postoperative analgesia can be achieved with intravenous oxycodone, this with less side effects than tramadol. It can therefore be a choice for postoperative pain relief in pediatric patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at www.chictr.org.cn (Registration number: ChiCTR1800016372; date of first registration: 28/05/2018; updated date:06/01/2023).

Nalbuphine May Be Superior to Sufentanil in Relieving Postcesarean Uterine Contraction Pain in Multiparas: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Purpose: Postcesarean pain remains a major complaint from puerperium women who have undergone cesarean section, especially uterine contraction induced visceral pain. The optimal opioid for pain relief after cesarean section (CS) is still unclear. The goal of this study was to compare the analgesic effect of Nalbuphine to Sufentanil in patients who underwent CS. Patients and Methods: In this single-center retrospective cohort study, we included patients who received Nalbuphine or Sufentanil Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia (PCIA) after CS between 1 January 2018 and 30 November 2020. Data on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at uterine contraction, at rest, and at movement, analgesic consumption, and side effects were collected. We performed logistic regression to identify predictors of severe uterine contraction pain. Results: A total of 674 patients were identified in the unmatched cohort, and 612 patients in the matched one. Compared to the Sufentanil group, lower VAS-contraction was recorded in the Nalbuphine group in both the unmatched and matched cohorts, the mean difference (MD) on POD1 was 0.35 (95% CI: 0.17 to 0.54, p<0.001) and 0.28 (95% CI: 0.08 to 0.47, p<0.001), respectively, and the MD of POD2 was 0.12 (95% CI: 0.03 to 0.40, P=0.019) and 0.12 (95% CI: 0.03 to 0.41, P=0.026), respectively. On POD1 but not POD2, VAS-movement was lower in the Nalbuphine group as compared to the Sufentanil group. No difference was found between VAS-rest on POD1 and POD2 in both unmatched and matched cohorts. Less analgesic consumption, and side effects were recorded in the Nalbuphine group. Logistic regression indicated that multipara and analgesic consumption were risk factors for severe uterine contraction pain. In subgroup analysis, VAS-contraction was meaningfully reduced in the Nalbuphine group compared with the Sufentanil group in multipara patients, but not primiparas. Conclusion: Compared to Sufentanil, Nalbuphine may provide better analgesia on uterine contraction pain. The superior analgesia may only exhibit in multiparas.

Patient-controlled intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine with nalbuphine versus sufentanil for post cesarean delivery analgesia: A retrospective observational study.

This retrospective observational study aims to investigate the patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) of dexmedetomidine (DEX) with nalbuphine (NAL) versus sufentanil (SUF) for post-cesarean delivery management. A total of 300 women were evaluated who underwent cesarean section surgery with combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. After surgery, all patients were connected to a patient-controlled analgesia pump. The PCIA protocol was programmed with 0.11 µg/kg/h DEX in combination with 0.03 µg/kg/h SUF in Group I (n = 150) or 0.11 µg/kg/h DEX in combination with 0.03 mg/kg/h NAL in Group II (n = 150). There was no significant difference in incision pain and sedation level between the two groups within 48 h after the surgery assessed by visual analog scale (VAS) and Ramsay sedation scale, respectively. However, at 2, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery, visceral pain at rest and at mobilization was alleviated in the Group II as compared with the Group I with lower VAS scores. Moreover, fewer adverse reactions were found in the Group II when compared with Group I, including postpartum respiratory depression, nausea/vomiting, urinary retention, and cardiovascular events. Overall, there was an increased patient satisfaction in the Group II as compared with the Group I. Based on the results of this study, it seems that adding NAL to PCIA with DEX, as compared to SUF with DEX, have an effect on reducing the intensity of visceral pain after cesarean section with less adverse reactions and higher patient satisfaction.

The optimal dose of oxycodone in PCIA after laparoscopic surgery for gastrointestinal cancer in elderly patients: A randomized controlled trial.

Objective: To explore the optimal bolus dose of oxycodone for patient controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) without background dose in elderly patients after laparoscopic surgery for gastrointestinal cancer. Methods: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled study, we recruited patients aged 65 years or older. They underwent laparoscopic resection for gastrointestinal cancer and received PCIA after surgery. Eligible patients were randomly divided into 0.01, 0.02, or 0.03 mg/kg group according to the bolus dose of oxycodone in PCIA. The primary outcome was VAS scores of pain on mobilization at 48 h after surgery. Secondary endpoints included the VAS scores of rest pain, the total and effective numbers of press in PCIA, cumulative dose of oxycodone used in PCIA, the incidence of nausea, vomiting and dizziness, as well as patients' satisfaction at 48 h after surgery. Results: A total of 166 patients were recruited and randomly assigned to receive a bolus dose of 0.01 mg/kg (n = 55), 0.02 mg/kg (n = 56) or 0.03 mg/kg (n = 55) of oxycodone in PCIA. The VAS scores of pain on mobilization, the total and effective numbers of press in PCIA in 0.02 mg/kg group and 0.03 mg/kg group were lower than those in 0.01 mg/kg group (P < 0.05). Cumulative dose of oxycodone used in PCIA and patients' satisfaction in 0.02 and 0.03 mg/kg groups were more than those in 0.01 mg/kg group (P < 0.01). The incidence of dizziness in 0.01 and 0.02 mg/kg groups was lower than that in 0.03 mg/kg group (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in VAS scores of rest pain, the incidence of nausea and vomiting among three groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: For elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for gastrointestinal cancer, 0.02 mg/kg bolus dose of oxycodone in PCIA without background infusion may be a better choice.