ABSTRACT
Objetivos: Analizar las características del manejo de la vía aérea (VA) en emergencias prehospitalarias, sus complicaciones y establecer factores predictores de fracaso en el primer intento de intubación orotraqueal (FIPI). Método: Estudio observacional de cohortes retrospectivo de pacientes que precisaron intubación orotraqueal por el servicio de emergencias prehospitalarias de Castilla La Mancha, desde el 01-06-2017 hasta el 01-01-2021. Se analizaron características de los pacientes, del procedimiento y sus complicaciones, se realizó una regresión logística para detectar factores predictores de FIPI. Resultados: Se incluyeron 425 pacientes, 417 (98,1%) fueron intubados con éxito y 326 (76,7%) en el primer intento. Se registraron 183 complicaciones en 94 pacientes (22,1%). Los factores predictores de FIPI fueron la edad > 55 años (OR = 1,94; IC 95% 1,10-4,23), índice de masa corporal > 30 (OR = 9,14; IC 95% 4,40-19,00); saturación de oxígeno < 90% (OR = 3,33; IC 95% 1,06-10,58); puntuación en la Glasgow Coma Scale entre 9 y 13 (OR = 1,58; IC 95% 1,28-6,9); intubación realizada en vía pública (OR = 2,99; IC 95% 1,42-6,29); posición distinta a la bipedestación (OR = 2,09; IC 95% 1,08-7,25); laringoscopia directa (OR = 2,39; IC 95% 1,20-6,55); uso de estilete (OR = 1,80; IC 95% 1,40-3,78); y clasificación Cormack-Lehane $ 2 (OR = 6,50; IC 95% 3,96-30,68). Conclusiones: El procedimiento de intubación se realizó de forma habitual en el primer intento. Existen factores asociados a FIPI que permiten individualizar el manejo de la VA. (AU)
Objectives: To analyze the characteristics of prehospital emergency airway management, including complications; to explore predictors of first-attempt failure of orotracheal intubation. Material and methods: Observational retrospective cohort study of patients requiring orotracheal intubation by the prehospital emergency services of Castile-La Mancha between June 1, 2017, and January 1, 2021. We analyzed patient and procedure characteristics and complications using logistic regression analysis to detect factors that could predict firstattempt intubation failure. Results: A total of 425 patients were included; 417 (98.1%) were intubated successfully, including 326 (76.7%) on the first attempt. Complications occurred in 183 intubations in 94 patients (22.1%). Predictors of first-attempt failure were age over 55 years (odds ratio [OR], 1.94; 95% CI, 1.10-4.23), body mass index over 30 (OR, 9.14; 95% CI, 4.40-19.00), oxygen saturation less than 90% (OR, 3.33; 95% CI, 1.06-10.58), a Glasgow Coma Score between 9 and 13 (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.28-6.9), intubation in a public place (OR, 2.99; 95% CI, 1.42-6.29), intubation done in any other than standing position (OR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.08-7.25), direct laryngoscopy (OR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.20- 6.55), use of a stylet (OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.40-3.78), and a Cormack-Lehane classification of 2 or higher (OR, 6.50; 95% CI, 3.96-30.68). Conclusion: Orotracheal intubation is generally accomplished on the first attempt. Factors associated with first-attempt failure can facilitate tailored approaches to upper airway management. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Laryngoscopy/methods , Emergency Medical Services/methods , Retrospective Studies , Intubation, Intratracheal/methods , Airway ManagementABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To analyze the characteristics of prehospital emergency airway management, including complications; to explore predictors of first-attempt failure of orotracheal intubation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational retrospective cohort study of patients requiring orotracheal intubation by the prehospital emergency services of Castile-La Mancha between June 1, 2017, and January 1, 2021. We analyzed patient and procedure characteristics and complications using logistic regression analysis to detect factors that could predict firstattempt intubation failure. RESULTS: A total of 425 patients were included; 417 (98.1%) were intubated successfully, including 326 (76.7%) on the first attempt. Complications occurred in 183 intubations in 94 patients (22.1%). Predictors of first-attempt failure were age over 55 years (odds ratio [OR], 1.94; 95% CI, 1.10-4.23), body mass index over 30 (OR, 9.14; 95% CI, 4.40-19.00), oxygen saturation less than 90% (OR, 3.33; 95% CI, 1.06-10.58), a Glasgow Coma Score between 9 and 13 (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.28-6.9), intubation in a public place (OR, 2.99; 95% CI, 1.42-6.29), intubation done in any other than standing position (OR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.08-7.25), direct laryngoscopy (OR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.20- 6.55), use of a stylet (OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.40-3.78), and a Cormack-Lehane classification of 2 or higher (OR, 6.50; 95% CI, 3.96-30.68). CONCLUSION: Orotracheal intubation is generally accomplished on the first attempt. Factors associated with first-attempt failure can facilitate tailored approaches to upper airway management.
OBJETIVO: Analizar las características del manejo de la vía aérea (VA) en emergencias prehospitalarias, sus complicaciones y establecer factores predictores de fracaso en el primer intento de intubación orotraqueal (FIPI). METODO: Estudio observacional de cohortes retrospectivo de pacientes que precisaron intubación orotraqueal por el servicio de emergencias prehospitalarias de Castilla La Mancha, desde el 01-06-2017 hasta el 01-01-2021. Se analizaron características de los pacientes, del procedimiento y sus complicaciones, se realizó una regresión logística para detectar factores predictores de FIPI. RESULTADOS: . Se incluyeron 425 pacientes, 417 (98,1%) fueron intubados con éxito y 326 (76,7%) en el primer intento. Se registraron 183 complicaciones en 94 pacientes (22,1%). Los factores predictores de FIPI fueron la edad > 55 años (OR = 1,94; IC 95% 1,10-4,23), índice de masa corporal > 30 (OR = 9,14; IC 95% 4,40-19,00); saturación de oxígeno 90% (OR = 3,33; IC 95% 1,06-10,58); puntuación en la Glasgow Coma Scale entre 9 y 13 (OR = 1,58; IC 95% 1,28-6,9); intubación realizada en vía pública (OR = 2,99; IC 95% 1,42-6,29); posición distinta a la bipedestación (OR = 2,09; IC 95% 1,08-7,25); laringoscopia directa (OR = 2,39; IC 95% 1,20-6,55); uso de estilete (OR = 1,80; IC 95% 1,40-3,78); y clasificación Cormack-Lehane $ 2 (OR = 6,50; IC 95% 3,96-30,68). CONCLUSIONES: El procedimiento de intubación se realizó de forma habitual en el primer intento. Existen factores asociados a FIPI que permiten individualizar el manejo de la VA.
Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Services , Laryngoscopy , Airway Management , Emergency Medical Services/methods , Humans , Intubation, Intratracheal/methods , Laryngoscopy/methods , Middle Aged , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
STUDY OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyze previously reported airway risk factors in the performance of Miller laryngoscopy and orotracheal intubation. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: Operating rooms. PATIENTS: A total of 978 American Society of Anesthesiologists I-III adults requiring general orotracheal anesthesia for elective surgery. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS: Nine previously reported airway risk factors used in predicting difficult laryngoscopy, modified McCormack-Lehane views observed during initial unaided Miller blade laryngoscopy, and number of attempts or need for alternate airway tools to facilitate orotracheal intubation. MAIN RESULTS: Orotracheal intubation occurred in 941 of 978 (96.2%) patients with the Miller blade, although 8 patients required 3 attempts, with the remaining 37 patients requiring alternate airway tools. There were no failed orotracheal intubations. Multivariable analysis revealed that modified Mallampati class, thyromental distance, and ability to prognath were associated with progressively inferior modified Cormack-Lehane views, whereas modified Mallampati class, height, and head and neck extension were associated with progressive difficulty with orotracheal intubation. CONCLUSIONS: The Miller blade is highly successful in the performance of direct laryngoscopy for orotracheal intubation. These findings suggest that different sets of airway risk factors affect the process of laryngoscopy and orotracheal intubation.
Subject(s)
Intubation, Intratracheal/instrumentation , Laryngoscopes , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Anesthesia, General/methods , Equipment Design , Female , Humans , Intubation, Intratracheal/methods , Laryngoscopy/instrumentation , Laryngoscopy/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , ROC Curve , Risk Factors , Treatment Failure , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Endotracheal intubation with direct laryngoscope requires movement of the head, neck, and cervical spine. Spine movement may be limited for anatomical reasons or because of cervical spine injury. The lightwand requires less neck flexion and head extension than the conventional laryngoscope. The purpose of this study was to compare the extension of cervical spine obtained with lightwand and Macintosh laryngoscope. METHODS: Twenty patients requiring general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation were studied. Patients were placed on the operating table and anesthesia was induced. Intubation were performed on two occasions: with lightwands and Macintosh #3 laryngoscopes. Cricoid pressure was not applied. To determine cervical spine extension, five radiographs were taken in each patient (before induction, during mask ventilation, during intubation with lightwand, during laryngoscopy with the Macintosh blade: in the best glottic view or during intubation). RESULTS: Of 20 cases, we excluded 2 cases due to the technical error. Significant reduction of radiographic cervical spine extension were found in the lightwand compared to Macintosh blade at all cervical level. Mean atlantooccipital extension angles were 6.2o and 11.7o for the lightwand and Macintosh, respectively. There were no significant differences between mask ventilation and intubation with lightwand. CONCLUSIONS: Lightwand may be better than the conventional intubation in patients whose cervical spine movement is limited or undesirable, especially in the patients in whom awake intubation is not available.
