Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Enferm Intensiva (Engl Ed) ; 33(3): 132-140, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35941074

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To identify commonly used intravenous drugs that may produce endothelial damage. METHODS: An experimental research study was performed using a sample of 62 intravenous drugs commonly used in emergency care, pH and osmolarity were measured. Subsequently, based on these values, the theoretical capacity to cause irritation or endovascular damage was determined and classified as high, moderate, and low. RESULTS: Samples from 19 drugs for fluid therapy, 21 antibiotics and 22 drugs for intravenous use were studied. Glucose solutions, sodium bicarbonate 1M and mannitol 10% showed a high capacity to cause venous irritation. Vancomycin, ciprofloxacin, amiodarone, haloperidol, and labetalol solution presented a high capacity for irritation based on their acidic pH. The antibiotics, dexketoprofen, diazepam, digoxin, etomidate, phenytoin, levetiracetam and metamizole also showed high osmotic values in their reconstituted or undiluted presentations. Moreover, osmolarity of diazepam, digoxin and phenytoin remained high despite being diluted in 100 ml of saline. CONCLUSIONS: Knowing the pH and osmolarity of intravenous drugs allows their capacity to cause endothelial damage to be assessed. The use of comprehensive tables based on the chemical properties of the drugs can be a useful tool to help prevent chemically-induced phlebitis.


Subject(s)
Phenytoin , Phlebitis , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Diazepam , Digoxin , Humans
2.
Enferm. intensiva (Ed. impr.) ; 33(3): 132-140, Jul - Sep 2022. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-206126

ABSTRACT

Objetivos: Identificar los medicamentos intravenosos de uso común en el ámbito hospitalario con capacidad de producir daño endotelial. Método: Estudio experimental in vitro. La muestra estuvo formada por 62 medicamentos de uso común en los servicios de urgencias y hospitalización. Las variables estudiadas fueron la osmolaridad y el pH. Posteriormente, en base a esos valores, se determinó la capacidad teórica para provocar daño endotelial, clasificándola en alta, moderada y baja. Resultados: Se analizaron 19 medicamentos para fluidoterapia, 21 antibióticos y 22 medicamentos intravenosos. Las soluciones de glucosa, el bicarbonato 1M y el manitol 10% presentaron una capacidad elevada para provocar irritación venosa. Vancomicina, ciprofloxacino, amiodarona, haloperidol y labetalol mostraron una capacidad irritativa elevada derivada de su pH marcadamente ácido. Los antibióticos, dexketoprofeno, diazepam, digoxina, etomidato, fenitoína, levetiracetam y metamizol presentaron valores extremos de osmolaridad en su presentación reconstituida o sin diluir, y mantuvieron sus valores de tonicidad elevados después de diluirlos en 100ml de suero salino el diazepam, la digoxina y la fenitoína. Conclusiones: Conocer el pH y la osmolaridad de los medicamentos intravenosos permite evaluar su capacidad para provocar daño endotelial. La creación de tablas comprensivas en base a las propiedades químicas de los medicamentos puede constituir una herramienta útil que contribuya a prevenir la flebitis químicamente inducida.(AU)


Aims: To identify commonly used intravenous drugs that may produce endothelial damage. Methods: An experimental research study was performed using a sample of 62 intravenous drugs commonly used in emergency care, pH and osmolarity were measured. Subsequently, based on these values, the theoretical capacity to cause irritation or endovascular damage was determined and classified as high, moderate, and low. Results: Samples from 19 drugs for fluid therapy, 21 antibiotics and 22 drugs for intravenous use were studied. Glucose solutions, sodium bicarbonate 1M and mannitol 10% showed a high capacity to cause venous irritation. Vancomycin, ciprofloxacin, amiodarone, haloperidol, and labetalol solution presented a high capacity for irritation based on their acidic pH. The antibiotics, dexketoprofen, diazepam, digoxin, etomidate, phenytoin, levetiracetam and metamizole also showed high osmotic values in their reconstituted or undiluted presentations. Moreover, osmolarity of diazepam, digoxin and phenytoin remained high despite being diluted in 100mL of saline. Conclusions: Knowing the pH and osmolarity of intravenous drugs allows their capacity to cause endothelial damage to be assessed. The use of comprehensive tables based on the chemical properties of the drugs can be a useful tool to help prevent chemically-induced phlebitis.(AU)


Subject(s)
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Administration, Intravenous/adverse effects , 28573 , In Vitro Techniques , Endothelium/injuries , Osmolar Concentration , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Phlebitis , Fluid Therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Critical Care Nursing
3.
Farm. hosp ; 45(4): 198-203, julio-agosto 2021. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-218704

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: Realizar un consenso de expertos utilizando el método Delphipara la clasificación del potencial de daño tisular de los antineoplásicosque facilite la toma de decisiones ante una extravasación.Método: El panel de evaluadores estaba formado por siete farmacéuticos del grupo de trabajo de extravasaciones. Otro actuó comocoordinador. Se revisó la probabilidad de daño tisular a partir de ochodocumentos de referencia. Se clasificaron en cuatro categorías: vesicante, irritante de alto riesgo, irritante de bajo riesgo y no irritante. Serealizaron dos rondas; tras éstas los fármacos con consenso < 70% sediscutieron en grupo de forma no anónima. Se analizó para cada ronda:la mediana del grado de consenso y ámbito intercuartílico (AIQ25-75),el grado de concordancia por categoría de daño tisular y el porcentaje de antineoplásicos con grado de consenso > 85% y del 100%.Se analizaron de forma separada los fármacos con discordancias declasificación entre los documentos consultados. Se utilizó el programaestadístico SPSS v23.0. (AU)


Objective: To reach at an expert consensus, using the Delphi method, forclassifying the tissue-damaging potential of antineoplastic drugs, in order tofacilitate the decision-making process in the event of extravasations.Method: The panel of expert evaluators was made up of seven pharmacists belonging to the working group on extravasations. Other memberserved as coordinator. The likelihood of tissue damage was reviewed on thebasis of eight reference documents. Four categories of drugs were established: vesicant (V); high risk irritant (HRI); low risk irritant (LRI) and non-irritant(NI). Two rounds of surveys were performed. The drugs with an agreementof less than 70% after the two rounds were discussed non-anonymously by thegroup. For each of the rounds the following was analysed: median ofthe degree of consensus and the interquartile range (IQR25-75), degreeof agreement by tissue damage category, and percentage of antineoplastics reaching a degree of consensus of over 85% and of 100%. Drugswhose classification differed in the various reference documents were assessed separately. SPSS v23.0 statistical software was used. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Consensus , Pharmaceutical Services , Cytostatic Agents , Drug Therapy , Irritants
4.
Rev. bras. oftalmol ; 75(2): 115-120, Mar.-Apr. 2016. tab, graf
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-779969

ABSTRACT

RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar a irritação ocular aguda em coelhos, após a administração tópica de óleo essencial. Métodos: Para tanto, os animais foram divididos em três grupos, cada um com três coelhos, totalizando 6 olhos por grupo, e a diferença entre eles foi a concentração utilizada ( 1, 3 e 9%). Aplicou-se no saco conjuntival, de um dos olhos do animal, uma dose única de 0,1 ml do produto e o olho contralateral foi usado como controle. Analisou-se os efeitos causados pelo óleo essencial na conjuntiva, íris e córnea após 1, 24, 48, 72 horas e no final do sétimo dia após a aplicação tópica. As avaliações oftalmológicas foram feitas com o auxílio de um oftalmoscópio binocular indireto com e sem fluoresceína. As reações observadas foram graduadas segundo a escala de Draize. Foram realizados exames anatomopatológicos em todos os olhos estudados no final do experimento. Resultados: No grupo de animais submetidos à instilação ocular do óleo essencial a 1%, não se observou alterações. O tratamento com o óleo a 3% provocou alteração conjuntival no exame feito em 1 hora, o que foi reduzindo. A administração do óleo essencial a 9% induziu hiperemia conjuntival, não havendo qualquer alteração nos outros tempos de avaliação oftalmológica. Conclusão: A avaliação contribuiu para conhecer as alterações clínicas na superfície ocular. Desta forma, foi possível classificar o óleo a 1% como não irritante e nas concentrações de 3 e 9% como pouco irritante, tornando possível estudos clínicos, a fim de estabelecer o óleo como alternativa terapêutica em conjuntivites bacterianas.


ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate acute eye irritation in rabbits following topical administration of essential oil. Methods: animals were divided into three groups, each containing three rabbits, with a total of 6 eyes per group. The difference between them was the concentration used (1, 3 and 9%). A single dose of 0.1 ml of the product was applied into the conjunctival sac of one eye of the animal, and the contralateral eye was used as control. The effects caused by the essential oil in the conjunctiva, iris and cornea were analyzed after 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours and at the end of the seventh day after topical application. Ophthalmologic evaluations were performed with the aid of a binocular indirect ophthalmoscope fluorescein and with and without the observed responses, before being graded according to the Draize scale. Pathological examinations were performed on all eyes studied at the end of the experiment. Results: in the group of animals subjected to the ocular instillation of 1% essential oil, there was no change. For treatment with 3% oil, conjunctival changes were found to be decreasing during the examination after 1 hour. Administration of the 9%essential oil induced conjunctival injection, without any change in the other ophthalmologic evaluation times. Conclusion: the evaluation contributed to meet the clinical changes in the ocular surface. Thus, it was possible to classify the oil at 1% as non-irritating and the concentration of 3% and 9 as mildly irritating, making it possible for clinical studies to establish the oil as an alternative therapy in bacterial conjunctivitis.


Subject(s)
Animals , Plant Oils/pharmacology , Oils, Volatile/pharmacology , Iris/drug effects , Conjunctiva/drug effects , Cornea/drug effects , Origanum , Ophthalmoscopy , Rabbits , Plant Oils/administration & dosage , Oils, Volatile/administration & dosage , Conjunctivitis, Bacterial , Iritis/chemically induced , Administration, Topical , Toxicity Tests/methods , Corneal Opacity/chemically induced , Fluorescein , Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship , Hyperemia/chemically induced , Irritants/toxicity
5.
Arq. bras. oftalmol ; 74(5): 377-381, set.-out. 2011. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-608415

ABSTRACT

It is widely recognized today that outdoor air pollution can affect human health. Various chemical components that are present in ambient pollution may have an irritant effect on the mucous membranes of the body, particularly those of the respiratory tract. Much less attention has been focused on the adverse effect on the ocular surface, despite the fact that this structure is even more exposed to air pollution than the respiratory mucosa since only a very thin tear film separates the corneal and conjunctival epithelia from the air pollutants. So far, clinical data are the more widespread tools used by ophthalmologists for assessing possible aggression to the ocular surface; however, clinical findings alone appears not to correlate properly with the complaints presented by the patients pointing out the need for further clinical and laboratory studies on the subject. The purpose of this study is to review signs and symptoms associated with chronic long-term exposure to environmental air pollutants on the ocular structures currently defined as the ocular surface and to review clinical and laboratory tests used to investigate the adverse effects of air pollutants on such structures. We also review previous studies that investigated the adverse effects of air pollution on the ocular surface and discuss the need for further investigation on the subject.


Sabe-se hoje que a poluição ambiental pode afetar a saúde humana. Vários componentes químicos presentes na poluição atmosférica podem acarretar uma irritação nas mucosas, particularmente no trato respiratório. Pouca ênfase tem sido dada à superfície ocular, embora esta estrutura seja até mais exposta à poluição ambiental do que o trato respiratório visto que apenas uma fina camada de filme lacrimal separa a córnea e a conjuntiva dos poluentes presentes no ar. Até o momento, a avaliação clínica é o método mais utilizado pelos oftalmologistas para se detectar uma possível agressão à superfície ocular; entretanto esta avaliação apenas não parece correlacionar-se com as queixas e sinais apresentados pelos pacientes demonstrando a necessidade de mais estudos clínicos e laboratoriais sobre o assunto. O objetivo deste estudo é revisar os sinais e sintomas associados à exposição crônica aos poluentes ambientais no ar nas estruturas oculares definidas atualmente como superfície ocular e revisar os testes clínicos e laboratoriais usados para investigar os efeitos adversos dos poluentes em tais estruturas. Também revisamos estudos prévios que analisaram os efeitos adversos da poluição do ar na superfície ocular e discutimos a necessidade de mais estudos sobre o assunto.


Subject(s)
Humans , Air Pollutants/toxicity , Air Pollution/adverse effects , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Eye/drug effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...