Impact of Surgical Resection Without Spinal Fusion for Thoracic Dumbbell Tumors on Postoperative Global Spinal Sagittal Alignment and Clinical Outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective comparative study. OBJECTIVES: This study investigated radiographical changes in global spinal sagittal alignment (GSSA) and clinical outcomes after tumor resection without spinal fusion in patients with thoracic dumbbell tumors. METHODS: Thirty patients with thoracic dumbbell tumors who were followed up for at least 3 years were included in this study. Variations in the outcome variables were analyzed using individual GSSA parameters measured on radiography. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the modified McCormick scale (MMCS), Japan Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and visual analog scale (VAS). To assess the impact of the affected levels on these outcomes, we divided the patients into three groups according to the location of the tumor (upper [T1-4], middle [T5-8], or lower [T9-12] thoracic spine). RESULTS: The GSSA parameters (cervical lordosis, T1 slope, thoracic kyphosis [global, upper, middle, and lower], thoracolumbar kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, sacral slope, pelvic incidence, and pelvic tilt) of all the patients did not change significantly after surgery. Eleven of thirty patients had preoperative gait disturbances but they could walk without support (MMCS grade I or II) at the final follow-up. The JOA score and VAS showed significant postoperative improvements. No statistically significant differences were observed in each postoperative sagittal profile or clinical outcome between the upper, middle, and lower groups. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor resection without spinal fusion did not affect the various GSSA parameters and resulted in satisfactory clinical outcomes, indicating that spinal fusion may not always be necessary when resecting thoracic dumbbell tumors.

Preoperative and Postoperative Factors Affecting Patient Satisfaction with Double-Door Laminoplasty for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

Introduction: Few articles have investigated patient satisfaction with laminoplasty in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) alone, excluding other diseases, such as ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. In this study, we aimed to investigate patient satisfaction after double-door laminoplasty for CSM and determine the preoperative and postoperative factors that affect patient satisfaction. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed cases of laminoplasty for CSM. We measured sagittal imaging parameters (cervical lordosis [CL], C2-C7 cervical sagittal vertical axis [cSVA], and T1 slope [T1S]), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) such as the neck disability index (NDI) and visual analog scale (VAS) preoperatively, 3 months postoperatively, and 1 year postoperatively. In addition, a multiple regression analysis was performed to investigate factors affecting patient satisfaction. Results: Ninety patients were included in the analysis. After surgery, CL decreased significantly (p<0.01), whereas cSVA increased significantly (p<0.01). No significant differences were observed in the preoperative and postoperative T1S values (p=0.61). The JOA, NDI, and VAS scores significantly improved postoperatively (p<0.01). The median patient satisfaction was 85 (range, 12-100) at 1 year postoperatively and 80 (range, 25-100) at 3 months postoperatively. In the multiple regression analysis, lower-extremity sensory disorder in the JOA score at 1 year postoperatively (p<0.01) and VAS scores for neck pain preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively (p=0.01 and p<0.01, respectively) were determined as factors affecting patient satisfaction. Conclusions: Cervical laminoplasty is a useful and satisfactory surgical procedure to restore patient function. However, patients with severe preoperative and postoperative neck pain and those with severe postoperative sensory disorders of the lower extremities may be less satisfied with the procedure. It is important to keep these things in mind when treating patients.

Analysis of Postoperative Clinical Outcomes in Cervical Myelopathy due to Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Involving C2.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. PURPOSE: To investigate the radiological phenotype, patient and surgery-related risk factors influencing postoperative clinical outcome for cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament involving C2 following posterior instrumented laminectomy and fusion. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Ossified posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) is caused by ectopic ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. It can cause neurological impairment and severe disability. For multilevel cervical OPLL, studies have shown good neurological recovery following cord decompression via either an anterior or posterior approach. There is, however, a lacunae in the literature regarding the outcomes of patients with OPLL extending to C2 and above (C2 [+]). METHODS: We retrospectively studied 61 patients with C2 (+) OPLL who had posterior instrumented laminectomy and fusion at Ganga Hospital, Coimbatore between July 2011 and January 2021, with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Data on demographics, clinical outcomes, radiology, and post-surgical outcomes were gathered. RESULTS: Among 61 patients, 56 were males and five were females. The OPLL pattern was mixed in 32 cases (52.5%), continuous in 26 cases (42.6%), segmental in two cases (3.3%), and circumscribed in one patient (1.6%). All of our patients showed signs of neurological improvement after a 24-month follow-up. The mean preoperative modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score was 10.6 (range, 5-11) and the postoperative mJOA score was 15.8 (range, 12-18). The recovery rate was >75% in 27 patients (44.6%), >50% in 32 patients (52.5%), and >25% in two patients (3.3%). The average recovery rate was 71% (range, 33%-100%). The independent risk factor for predicting recovery rate is the preoperative mJOA score. CONCLUSIONS: In C2 (+) OPLL, posterior instrumented decompression and fusion provide a relatively safe approach and satisfactory results.

Resection of Cervical Dumbbell-Shaped Schwannoma Using Posterior Unilateral Approach: Impact on Postoperative Cervical Function and Clinical Outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective comparative study. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the radiographical changes in cervical sagittal alignment (CSA) and clinical outcomes after tumor resection using a posterior unilateral approach without spinal fixation for patients with cervical dumbbell-shaped schwannoma (DS). METHODS: Seventy-three patients with DS who were followed up for at least 2 years were included. The Eden classification was used to designate the types of DS. The CSA and range of motion (ROM) were analyzed using radiographs. The clinical outcomes were assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and JOA cervical myelopathy questionnaire. RESULTS: The CSA in the neutral, flexion, and extension position and cervical ROM were not significantly reduced in the follow-up period. The JOA scores showed significant improvement after surgery. The postoperative radiographic parameters and clinical outcomes of Eden type II or III DS, which needed facetectomy for the resection, did not show any statistically significant difference compared with those of Eden type I tumor, which was resected without facetectomy. Fifty-two cases (71.2%) achieved gross total resection, whereas 21 cases (28.8%) remained in partial resection (PR). One case underwent reoperation due to the regrowth of the remnant tumor whose margin was at the entrance of the intervertebral foramen. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor resection using the posterior unilateral approach preserved CSA and resulted in favorable clinical outcomes in patients with DS. When the resection ends in PR, the proximal margin of the remnant tumor should be located distally away from the entrance of the foramen to prevent regrowth.

Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: An Overview.

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a spinal condition of growing importance due to its increasing prevalence within the ageing population. DCM involves the degeneration of the cervical spine due to various processes such as disc ageing, osteophyte formation, ligament hypertrophy or ossification, as well as coexisting congenital anomalies. This article provides an overview of the literature on DCM and considers areas of focus for future research. A patient with DCM can present with a variety of symptoms ranging from mild hand paraesthesia and loss of dexterity to a more severe presentation of gait disturbance and loss of bowel/bladder control. Hoffman's sign and the inverted brachioradialis reflex are also important signs of this disease. The gold standard imaging modality is MRI which can identify signs of degeneration of the cervical spine. Other modalities include dynamic MRI, myelography, and diffusion tensor imaging. One important scoring system to aid with the diagnosis and categorisation of the severity of DCM is the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score. This considers motor, sensory, and bowel/bladder dysfunction, and categorises patients into mild, moderate, or severe DCM. DCM is primarily treated with surgery as this can halt disease progression and may even allow for neurological recovery. The surgical approach will depend on the location of degeneration, the number of cervical levels involved and the pathophysiological process. Surgical approach options include anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, corpectomy, or posterior approach (laminectomy ± fusion). Conservative management is also considered for some patients with mild or non-progressive DCM or for patients where surgery is not an option. Conservative treatment may include physical therapy, traction, or neck immobilisation. Future recommendations include research into the prevalence rate of DCM and if there is a difference between populations. Further research on the benefit of conservative management for patients with mild or non-progressive DCM would be recommended.

Clinical Effectiveness of Conservative Treatments on Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Objective: To systematically evaluate the clinical effectiveness of conservative treatments including pharmacological treatments and nonpharmacological treatments on patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Methods: We searched six electronic databases systematically for randomized clinical trials published between January 2000 and July 2021, including the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang Data, PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane library. The studies focused on the therapeutic effects of pharmacological treatments including calcitonin, antiepileptics, neurotrophic drugs, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, Chinese Traditional Medicine, limaprost, and nonpharmacological treatments like physiotherapy for treating lumbar spinal stenosis were included. The outcome was measured using the visual analog scale, Oswestry Dysfunction Index, Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score, and EuroQol Five Dimensions Questionnaire. The quality of eligible studies was assessed by using the Cochrane recommended bias risk assessment tool. Stata was used to conduct the network meta-analysis. Results: A total of 12 randomized control trials with 1,194 patients were included. The network meta-analysis showed that for the visual analog scale, a better therapeutic effect was noted while using Chinese Traditional Medicine and physiotherapy, followed by analgesics drugs and limaprost. Limaprost and calcitonin were better in decreasing the Oswestry Dysfunction Index. In terms of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score, the use of traditional Chinese Medicine and limaprost were associated with a better improvement than other treatments. Meanwhile, limaprost combined with analgesics drugs was found to be effective to improve the EuroQol Five Dimensions Questionnaire. Conclusion: Among the commonly used conservative treatments for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis, limaprost may have better efficacy in improving the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score and decreasing the Oswestry Dysfunction Index, with a beneficial effect on decreasing the visual analog scale and improving the EuroQol Five Dimensions Questionnaire. Systematic Review Registration: website, identifier registration number.

Surgery Can Improve Locomotive Syndrome Due to Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis and Loco-Check Can Predict Best Timing of Surgery to Avoid Progress of Locomotive Syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: The loco-check is a simple tool for evaluating locomotive syndrome (LS), and a previous report suggested that it can be used to identify patients with stage 2 LS. The purpose of this study was to investigate the improvement in LS stage after surgery based on the loco-check in elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and to clarify the characteristics associated with improvement to non-stage 2 LS. METHODS: We reviewed 40 elderly patients with LSS who underwent surgery at our institution. We compared the pre- and postoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, loco-check, Oswestry Disability Index, EuroQoL-5 dimension utility values, and the EuroQoL-visual analog scale. We divided patients according to the presence or absence of stage 2 LS after surgery and compared their preoperative clinical findings and assessment measures. RESULTS: Ninety percent of all patients had been preoperatively diagnosed with stage 2 LS according to the loco-check. After surgery, patients showed a decreased number of affirmative answers on the loco-check, according to which only 65% were postoperatively diagnosed with stage 2 LS. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified less than four affirmative answers on the loco-check before LSS as predictive of improvement to non-stage 2 LS. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment for elderly patients with LSS could improve LS. In patients with less than four affirmative answers on the loco-check preoperatively, improvement to non-stage 2 LS status may be possible.

Long-term functional outcome of surgical treatment for degenerative cervical myelopathy.

OBJECTIVE: Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a major global cause of spinal cord dysfunction. Surgical treatment is considered a safe and effective way to improve functional outcome, although information about long-term functional outcome remains scarce despite increasing longevity. The objective of this study was to describe functional outcome 10 years after surgery for DCM. METHODS: A prospective observational cohort study was undertaken in a university-affiliated neurosurgery department. All patients who underwent surgery for DCM between 2008 and 2010 as part of the multicenter Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy International trial were included. Participants were approached for additional virtual assessment 10 years after surgery. Functional outcome was assessed according to the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA; scores 0-18) score at baseline and 1, 2, and 10 years after surgery. The minimal clinically important difference was defined as 1-, 2-, or 3-point improvement for mild, moderate, and severe myelopathy, respectively. Outcome was considered durable when stabilization or improvement after 2 years was maintained at 10 years. Self-evaluated effect of surgery was assessed using a 4-point Likert-like scale. Demographic, clinical, and surgical data were compared between groups that worsened and improved or remained stable using descriptive statistics. Functional outcome was compared between various time points during follow-up with linear mixed models. RESULTS: Of the 42 originally included patients, 37 participated at follow-up (11.9% loss to follow-up, 100% response rate). The mean patient age was 56.1 years, and 42.9% of patients were female. Surgical approaches were anterior (76.2%), posterior (21.4%), or posterior with fusion (2.4%). The mean follow-up was 10.8 years (range 10-12 years). The mean mJOA score increased significantly from 13.1 (SD 2.3) at baseline to 14.2 (SD 3.3) at 10 years (p = 0.01). A minimal clinically important difference was achieved in 54.1%, and stabilization of functional status was maintained in 75.0% in the long term. Patients who worsened were older (median 63 vs 52 years, p < 0.01) and had more comorbidities (70.0% vs 25.9%, p < 0.01). A beneficial effect of surgery was self-reported by 78.3% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment for DCM results in satisfactory improvement of functional outcome that is maintained at 10-year follow-up.

The short-term outcomes of minimally invasive decompression surgery in patients with lumbar ossification or calcification of the ligamentum flavum.

OBJECTIVE: Although minimally invasive endoscopic surgery techniques are established standard treatment choices for various degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine, the surgical indications of such techniques for specific cases, such as segments with ossification of the ligamentum flavum (OLF) or calcification of the ligamentum flavum (CLF), remain under investigation. Therefore, the authors aimed to demonstrate the short-term outcomes of minimally invasive endoscopic surgery in patients with degenerative lumbar disease with CLF or OLF. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study including consecutive patients who underwent microendoscopic posterior decompression at the authors' institution, where the presence of OLF and CLF did not influence the surgical indication. Fifty-nine patients with OLF and 39 patients with CLF on preoperative CT were identified from the database. Subsequently, two matched control groups (one each matched to the OLF and CLF groups) were created using propensity scores to adjust for age, sex, preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and Oswestry Disability Index, and diagnosis. The background, surgical outcomes, and changes in clinical scores were compared between the matched groups. If there was a significant difference in the improvement of clinical scores, a multivariate linear regression model was applied. RESULTS: On performing univariate analysis, patients with OLF were found to have a higher body mass index (Mann-Whitney U-test, p = 0.001), higher incidence of preoperative motor weakness (chi-square test, p = 0.019), longer operative time (Mann-Whitney U-test, p < 0.001), and lower improvement in the JOA score (mixed-effects model, p = 0.023) than the matched controls. On performing multivariate analysis, the presence of OLF was identified as an independent variable associated with a poor recovery rate based on the JOA score (multivariate linear regression, p < 0.001). In contrast, there were no significant differences between patients with CLF and their matched controls in terms of preoperative and surgical data and postoperative improvements in clinical scores. CONCLUSIONS: Although the perioperative surgical outcomes, including the surgical complications, and the in-hospital period did not significantly differ, the short-term improvement in the JOA score was significantly lower in patients with degenerative lumbar disease accompanied by OLF than in the patients from the matched control group. In contrast, there were no significant differences in the short-term improvement in clinical scores and perioperative outcomes between patients with CLF and their matched control group. Thus, the surgical indications of minimally invasive posterior decompression for patients with CLF can be the same as those for patients without CLF; however, the indications for patients with OLF should be further investigated in future studies, including the other surgical methods.

Massage manipulation vs. low back muscle exercise for lumbar intervertebral instability: A preliminary randomized clinical trial.

This is a preliminary randomized clinical trial on patients conducted at Wuxi Hospital Affiliated with Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine from September 2015 to December 2016. The patients with intervertebral instability were randomized 1:1 for massage (20 min/day for 6 days) or exercise (3 sessions/day for 15 days). Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Oswestry disability score, and quantitative fluoroscopy (QF) were performed before and after the treatment and at 1 and 3 months thereafter. Improvement rates were noted to be 86.7% and 40.0% in the massage and exercise groups, respectively. Massage group showed significant changes in the JOA and Oswestry disability scores (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002), while the exercise group did not show any significant change (p > 0.05). Changes in the JOA and Oswestry disability scores were more important in the massage group (p < 0.05). All dynamic imaging parameters were improved in the massage group (all p < 0.05) but not in the exercise group (all p>0.05). These results suggest that the massage manipulation could be an appropriate way to treat intervertebral instability.

Application of task-state fMRI in evaluating disease severity and prognosis of cervical spondylotic myelopathy / 中国组织工程研究

BACKGROUND: Blood oxygenation level dependent functional MRI (BOLD-fMRI) has proven to be a powerful tool for studying the functional change of the brain. In task-state fMRI study, the functional reorganization of sensory and motor cortex has been observed in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. OBJECTIVE: To discuss the correlations between task-state fMRI measurements with clinical symptoms and surgical outcomes of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. METHODS: Eighty-two patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing posterior cervical decompression (cervical spondylotic myelopathy group) and forty-five healthy volunteers (normal group) were recruited from January 2018 to January 2019. All subjects underwent fMRI and performed a finger-tapping paradigm with the right hand. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association score was used to evaluate the function of the spinal cord. Japanese Orthopaedic Association score recovery rate less than 50% was defined as a poor result. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) Japanese Orthopaedic Association score was significantly improved after surgery in the cervical spondylotic myelopathy group compared with that before surgery (P 0.05). Before surgery, VOA ratio (left precentral gyrus/left postcentral gyrus) was significantly higher in the cervical spondylotic myelopathy group than in normal group (P 0.05). VOA ratio was significantly decreased compared with that preoperatively (P < 0.05). (4) Correlation analysis revealed that the VOA in the left precentral gyrus and left postcentral gyrus and VOA ratio were significantly correlated with preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association score and postoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association score recovery rate (P < 0.05). The absolute value of correlation coefficient of VOA ratio with preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association score and postoperative recovery rate was largest. (5) Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the area under the curve value for the VOA ratio was 0.803, indicating strong predictive discrimination, and the cut-off value was 3.621. The area under the curve value for Japanese Orthopaedic Association score was 0.751, and the cut-off value was 8. The predictive effect of VOA ratio was higher than Japanese Orthopaedic Association score. (6) The results indicate that the VOA in the left precentral gyrus and left postcentral gyrus was negatively correlated with severity of clinical symptoms (Japanese Orthopaedic Association score). Preoperative VOA ratio can effectively predict the recovery of spinal cord function after operation in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Serial plasma DNA levels as predictors of outcome in patients with acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury.

BACKGROUND: Acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) is a leading cause of disability in adolescents and young adults worldwide. Evidence from previous studies suggests that circulating cell-free DNA is associated with severity following acute injury. The present study determined whether plasma DNA levels in acute cervical SCI are predictive of outcome. METHODS: In present study, serial plasma nuclear DNA (nDNA) and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) levels were obtained from 44 patients with acute traumatic cervical SCI at five time points from day 1 to day 180 post-injury. Control blood samples were obtained from 66 volunteers. RESULTS: Data showed a significant increase in plasma nDNA and mtDNA concentrations at admission in SCI patients compared to the control group. Plasma nDNA levels at admission, but not plasma mtDNA levels, were significantly associated with the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and Injury Severity Score in patients with acute traumatic cervical SCI. In patients with non-excellent outcomes, plasma nDNA increased significantly at days 1, 14 and 30 post-injury. Furthermore, its level at day 14 was independently associated with outcome. Higher plasma nDNA levels at the chosen cutoff point (> 45.6 ng/ml) predicted poorer outcome with a sensitivity of 78.9% and a specificity of 78.4%. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate JOA score performance and plasma nDNA levels reflect the severity of spinal cord injury. Therefore, the plasma nDNA assays can be considered as potential neuropathological markers in patients with acute traumatic cervical SCI.

Clinical outcomes and risk factors in patients with cervical metastatic spinal cord compression after posterior decompressive and spinal stabilization surgery.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical results of surgery for cervical spine metastasis and identify clinical risk factors affecting postoperative survival and neurological outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of medical records was performed on 19 patients who had undergone decompressive surgery and spine stabilization due to metastatic spinal cord compression in the cervical spine. All patients had severe pain before surgery. Worst pain, average pain, and pain interference were evaluated using the visual analog scale (range, 0-10) for each patient at baseline and following surgery. Neurological recovery was assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score (JOAS). In addition, associations between ten characteristics and postoperative survival and neurological outcomes were analyzed in the study. RESULTS: The mean worst pain score in a 24-hour period was 8.6 before the operation. At 1 day, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the operation, the mean worst pain scores decreased to 5.6, 4.5, 3.8, 2.6, and 2.4 (all P<0.001 vs baseline), respectively. Similar decreases in average pain and pain interference were also observed. The median JOAS in a 24-hour period was 11.0 before the operation. At 1 day, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the operation, the median JOAS increased to 12.0 (P=0.469), 13.0 (P=0.010), 14.0 (P<0.001), 15.0 (P<0.001), and 14.0 (P<0.001), respectively. According to the multivariate analysis, postoperative survival was significantly associated with the type of primary tumor (P=0.033), preoperative ambulatory status (P=0.004), extra-spinal bone metastasis (P=0.021), 125I seed brachytherapy (P=0.014), and complication status (P=0.009). Better neurological outcome was found to be correlated with higher JOAS (P=0.013). Surgery-related complications occurred in 26.3% of patients. CONCLUSION: Posterior decompression and spine stabilization for painful cervical spine metastasis resulting from spinal cord compression were found to be effective for neurological recovery and pain control with a tolerable rate of complications.

Efficacy and Safety of Surgery for Mild Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Results of the AOSpine North America and International Prospective Multicenter Studies.

BACKGROUND: There is controversy over the optimal treatment strategy for patients with mild degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the degree of impairment in baseline quality of life as compared to population norms, as well as functional, disability, and quality of life outcomes following surgery in a prospective cohort of mild DCM patients undergoing surgical decompression. METHODS: We identified patients with mild DCM (modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association [mJOA] 15 to 17) enrolled in the prospective, multicenter AOSpine CSM-NA or CSM-I trials. Baseline quality of life Short Form-36 version 2 (SF-36v2) was compared to population norms by the standardized mean difference (SMD). Outcomes, including functional status (mJOA, Nurick grade), disability (NDI [Neck Disability Index]), and quality of life (SF-36v2), were evaluated at baseline and 6 mo, 1 yr, and 2 yr after surgery. Postoperative complications within 30 d of surgery were monitored. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-three patients met eligibility criteria. Mean age was 52.4 yr. There were 67 females (34.7%). Patients had significant impairment in all domains of the SF-36v2 compared to population norms, greatest for Social Functioning (SMD -2.33), Physical Functioning (SMD -2.31), and Mental Health (SMD -2.30). A significant improvement in mean score from baseline to 2-yr follow-up was observed for all major outcome measures, including mJOA (0.87, P < .01), Nurick grade (-1.13, P < .01), NDI (-12.97, P < .01), and SF-36v2 Physical Component Summary (PCS) (5.75, P < .01) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) (6.93, P < .01). The rate of complication was low. CONCLUSION: Mild DCM is associated with significant impairment in quality of life. Surgery results in significant gains in functional status, level of disability, and quality of life.

Clinical outcomes of anterior correction and reconstruction for neurofibromatosis-associated severe cervical kyphotic deformity.

PURPOSE: To assess the clinical outcome of anterior correction and reconstruction for severe cervical kyphotic deformity due to neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1). METHODS: In this study, we reviewed a series of seven patients who underwent anterior procedures for correction of NF-1-associated cervical kyphotic deformity. After continuous preoperative skull traction, all patients received anterior corpectomy and fusion (ACCF), anterior discectomy and fusion (ACDF), or combined ACCF and ACDF for surgical correction and reconstruction. Pre- and postoperative local and global Cobb angles, correction rate, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and T1-slope were assessed by X-ray. Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, JOA recovery rate, visual analog scale (VAS), and Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores were recorded to assess the outcome. RESULTS: Kyphosis was corrected successfully in all patients in terms of local and global Cobb angles (P < 0.05), with a correction rates of 83.1% (range, 66.0 to 115.5%) and 88.6% (range, 61.1 to 125.0%), respectively. JOA scores of patients were improved from preoperative 10.4 (range, 6 to 14) to postoperative 15.4 (range, 14 to 17), with a recovery rate as 77.6% (range, 66.7 to 100%). NDI scores were reduced from preoperative 25.1 (range, 13 to 35) to postoperative 8.7 (range, 5 to 12). VAS scores were reduced from preoperative 7.0 (range, 4 to 9) to postoperative 2.3 (range, 1 to 3). CONCLUSION: This study has demonstrated that anterior correction and reconstruction is an alternative option for the treatment of NF-1-associated severe cervical kyphosis when deformity is localized, flexible, or fixed.

Clinical and imaging characteristics in patients undergoing surgery for lumbar epidural lipomatosis.

BACKGROUND: Lumbar epidural lipomatosis (LEL) is characterized by abnormal accumulation of unencapsulated adipose tissue in the spinal epidural space. Such accumulation compresses the dural sac and nerve roots, and results in various neurological findings. However, the pathophysiology of LEL remains unclear. This study examined the associations between imaging and clinical findings in detail, and investigated the mechanisms underlying symptom onset by measuring intraoperative epidural pressures in LEL. METHODS: Sixteen patients (all men; mean age, 68.8 years) were enrolled between 2011 and 2015. Mean body mass index was 26.5 kg/m2. Four cases were steroid-induced, and the remaining 12 cases were idiopathic. All patients presented with neurological deficits in the lower extremities. Cauda equina syndrome (CES) alone was seen in 8 patients, radiculopathy alone in 4, and both radiculopathy and CES (mixed CES) in 4. All patients subsequently underwent laminectomy with epidural lipomatosis resection and were followed-up for more than 1 year. We investigated the clinical course and imaging and measured epidural pressures during surgery. RESULTS: Subjective symptoms improved within 1 week after surgery. Mean Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score was 15.2 ± 2.8 before surgery, improving to 25.4 ± 2.5 at 1 year after surgery. On magnetic resonance imaging, all lipomatosis lesions included the L4-5 level. On preoperative computed tomography, saucerization of the laminae was not observed in radiculopathy cases, whereas saucerization of the posterior vertebral body was observed in all radiculopathy or mixed CES cases. Intraoperative epidural pressures were significantly higher than preoperative subarachnoid pressures. The results suggest that high epidural pressure resulting from the proliferation of adipose tissue leads to saucerization of the lumbar spine and subsequent symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical courses were satisfactory after laminectomy. In LEL, epidural pressure increases and symptoms develop through the abnormal proliferation of adipose tissue. Higher epidural pressures induce saucerization of the laminae and/or posterior vertebral body. Furthermore, the direction of proliferative adipose tissue (i.e., site of saucerization) might be related to the types of neurological symptoms.

Does the effectiveness of core stability exercises correlate with the severity of spinal stenosis in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis?

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the effectiveness of core stability exercises correlates with the severity of spinal stenosis in patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. METHODS: Forty-two patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis treated in the department of orthopedics of our hospital between May 2013 and January 2016 were included in the study. All the patients performed core stability exercises once daily for six weeks, and the clinical outcomes were evaluated using Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and self-reported walking capacity. The anteroposterior osseous spinal canal diameter was measured to evaluate the severity of spinal stenosis. The correlation between the stenosis degree and the differences of Japanese Orthopaedic Association score or self-reported walking capacity at baseline and after treatment were analyzed. RESULTS: The patients were divided into three groups according to the spinal stenosis degree. In the three groups, there was no significant difference in JOA or self-reported walking distance at baseline (p>0.05) and after treatment (p>0.05). The JOA scores and self-reported walking distance were significantly increased after treatment (p<0.05) in any of the three groups when compared to the baseline. Also, there was no significant correlation between the stenosis degree and the difference of JOA (p>0.05) or self-reported walking distance (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: There was no significantcorrelation between the effectiveness of core stability exercises and the severity of spinal stenosis in patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

Optimum pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis value after operation for patients with adult degenerative scoliosis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Schwab classification for adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) concluded that health-related quality of life was closely related to curve type and three sagittal modifiers. It was suggested that pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis value (PI-LL) should be corrected within -10°~+10°. However, recent studies also indicated that ideal clinical outcomes could also be achieved in patients without the ideal PI-LL mentioned above. PURPOSE: This study evaluated the relation between the clinical outcomes and the PI-LL of Chinese patients with ADS who received long posterior internal fixation and fusion. STUDY DESIGN: This was a single-center retrospective comparative study of patients treated by long posterior internal fixation and fusion in our hospital between 2010 and 2014. PATIENT SAMPLE: Inclusion criteria were age >45 years at the time of surgery, Cobb angle of lumbar curves ≥10°, long posterior internal fixation and fusion ≥least 3 motion segments, follow-up ≥2 years, complete preoperative and postoperative radiographic data, and functional evaluation results. Exclusion criteria were history of previous lumbar spine surgery, other kinds of scoliosis, history of severe spinal trauma, spinal tumor, ankylosing spondylitis, and spinal tuberculosis. Seventy-four patients were enrolled in this study. OUTCOME MEASURES: Operative parameters included intraoperative blood loss, duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, number of fusion levels, and decompression. The radiological measurements included Cobb angle of the curves and PI-LL. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale, and Lumbar Stiffness Disability Index (LSDI). In addition, the complications of surgery were also collected. One-way analysis of variance, Student t test, Kruskal-Wallis test, Pearson chi-square test, and curve estimation were calculated for variables. METHODS: All the patients were divided into Group 1 (long instrumentation and fusion to L5) and Group 2 (long instrumentation and fusion to S1). Operative parameters, radiological measurements, clinical outcomes, and complications of surgery were compared between two groups to confirm whether distal fusion level could influence therapeutic effect. Then patients were divided into PI-LL<10° (Group A), 10°≤PI-LL≤20° (Group B), PI-LL>20° (Group C). Operative parameters, radiological measurements, clinical outcomes, and complications of surgery were compared between each of the two groups. Curve estimation was performed to evaluate the relationship between postoperative PI-LL and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: No difference was found between Group 1 and Group 2 in all postoperative parameters (p>.05). There were significant differences in final ODI (p<.001) and final LSDI (p<.001) among Group A, Group B, and Group C. Cubic curve model fitted the relationship between PI-LL and final ODI better than other models (R2=0.379, p<.001). Cubic curve model fitted the relationship between PI-LL and final LSDI better than other models (R2=0.691, p<.001). There was a significant difference in proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) among groups (p=.038). No significant difference was found in other parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Optimal PI-LL value may be achieved between 10° and 20° in Chinese patients with ADS after long posterior instrumentation and fusion surgery with excellent clinical outcomes and a lower PJK occurrence.

Clinical Outcomes Following Surgical Management of Coexisting Parkinson Disease and Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

BACKGROUND: Distinguishing the causes of weakness and gait instability in patients with Parkinson disease (PD) and cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge due to symptomatic similarities. No study has reported outcomes following decompression in patients with PD and CSM. OBJECTIVE: To report outcomes following cervical decompression for patients with coexisting PD and CSM. METHODS: A retrospective matched cohort study of all patients with PD and CSM undergoing cervical decompression at a tertiary-care center between January 1996 and December 2014 was conducted. PD patients were matched to patients with CSM alone by age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, and operative parameters. Myelopathy was assessed by Nurick and modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scales. The effect of PD on mJOA was modeled using multivariable regression. RESULTS: Twenty-one matched pairs were included. PD patients experienced poorer improvement in Nurick (0.0 vs -1.0, P < .01) and mJOA (0.9 vs 2.5, P < .01) composite scores. However, no significant changes in absolute improvement in the upper extremity motor, upper extremity sensory, or sphincter mJOA components were observed. Multivariable regression identified PD as a significant predictor of decreased improvement in mJOA (ß = -0.89, P < .01) and failure to achieve a minimal clinically important difference in change in mJOA (OR 0.18, P = .03). CONCLUSION: This study is the first to characterize outcomes following cervical decompression in patients with PD and CSM. PD patients experienced symptomatic improvement but less overall improvement in myelopathy compared to controls. However, PD patients demonstrated improvement in upper extremity motor, upper extremity sensory, and sphincter symptoms no worse than control patients.

Indications for prophylactic lumbar decompression at the L3/4 level in patients with L4/5 responsible lumbar spinal canal stenosis.

INTRODUCTION: Lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSS) is a very common disease. When the responsible level is considered to be L4/5 despite the appearance of double-level (L3/4 and L4/5) stenosis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), it is difficult for spinal surgeons to decide whether prophylactic decompression should be performed at the L3/4 level. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the dural sac cross-sectional area (DCSA) at the L3/4 level and clinical symptoms in patients with double-level stenosis. METHODS: Thirty-five patients with double-level stenosis were registered in this study. All patients underwent decompression surgery at the L4/5 responsible level. The severity of patients' symptoms was evaluated by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and its rate of recovery. A measurement program on MRI was used to determine the DCSA. RESULTS: The clinical course of LSS according to the JOA score recovery rate at the final follow-up revealed that the good group (≥50%) included 27 patients, and the poor group (<50%) included 8 patients. In the good group, the mean DCSA at the L3/4 level was 72.3 ± 32.1 mm2 preoperatively and 71.3 ± 29.0 mm2 at the final follow-up. In contrast, in the poor group, the mean DCSA at the L3/4 level was 49.1 ± 23.8 mm2 preoperatively and 40.6 ± 14.1 mm2 at the final follow-up. Significant differences were observed in the preoperative and final follow-up DCSAs at the L3/4 level between two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the present results, prophylactic decompression surgery at the L3/4 level should be performed for patients with double-level stenosis and DCSA <50 mm2 at the L3/4 level.