Hospital employees' perception of Joint Commission International Accreditation: effect of re-accreditation.

Joint Commission International (JCI) accreditation is a recognized leader in healthcare accreditation worldwide. It aims to improve quality of care, patient safety, and organizational performance. Many hospitals do not apply for re-accreditation after JCI status expires. Understanding employees' perceptions of JCI accreditation would benefit hospital management. We aimed to examine whether re-accredited hospital employees perceived more significant benefits and were more likely to recommend JCI to other hospitals than ex-accredited employees. This is a prospective cross-sectional study with a comparison group design. Survey questionnaires, developed from a qualitative study, included perceptions of challenges, benefits, and overall rating of JCI accreditation. An electronic-based questionnaire was distributed to physicians, nurses, medical technicians, and administrative staff in five private Obstetrics and Gynecology hospitals in China, March-April 2023. Descriptive and linear regression analyses were performed. The statistically significant level is P-value <.05. Of 2326 employees, 1854 (79.7%) were included in the study after exclusions, 1195 were re-accredited, and 659 were ex-accredited. Perceptions of JCI accreditation were positive, as both groups reported a mean score >4.0 regarding the overall benefits. Adjusted for covariates, re-accredited employees were more willing to recommend JCI accreditation to other hospitals than ex-accredited employees. Re-accredited employees perceived greater benefits of JCI accreditation and were more willing to recommend it to other hospitals, suggesting that perceived benefits contribute to a desire to maintain and sustain JCI accreditation. Employee participation is vital for its effective implementation. Employees' perceived challenges and benefits may provide insights for healthcare leaders considering pursuing and reapplying for JCI accreditation.

Perceptions of Chinese hospital leaders on joint commission international accreditation: a qualitative study.

Background: Joint Commission International (JCI) accreditation plays a significant role in improving the quality of care and patient safety worldwide. Hospital leadership is critical in making international accreditation happen with successful implementation. Little is known about how Chinese hospital leaders experienced and perceived the impact of JCI accreditation. This paper is the first study to explore the perceptions of hospital leaders toward JCI accreditation in China. Methods: Qualitative semi-structured interviews were used to explore the perceptions of the chief operating officers, the chief medical officers, and the chief quality officers in five JCI-accredited hospitals in China. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the interview transcripts and identify the main themes. Results: Fifteen hospital leaders participated in the interviews. Three themes emerged from the analysis, namely the motivations, challenges, and benefits related to pursuing and implementing JCI accreditation. The qualitative study found that eight factors influenced hospital leadership to pursue JCI accreditation, five challenges were identified with implementing JCI standards, and eight benefits emerged from the leadership perspective. Conclusion: Pursuing JCI accreditation is a discretionary decision by the hospital leadership. Participants were motivated by prevalent perceptions that JCI requirements would be used as a management tool to improve the quality of care and patient safety in their hospitals. These same organizational leaders identified challenges associated with implementing and sustaining JCI accreditation. The significant challenges were a clear understanding of the foreign accreditation standards, making staff actively participate in JCI processes, and changing staff behaviors accordingly. The top 5 perceived benefits to JCI accreditation from the leaders' perspective were improved leadership and hospital safety, improvements in the care processes, and the quality of care and the learning culture improved. Other perceived benefits include enhanced reputation, better cost containment, and a sense of pride in the staff in JCI-accredited hospitals.

The Effects of Quality Assurance System Implementation on Work Well-Being and Patient Safety: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.

BACKGROUND: Systematic monitoring of work atmosphere and patient safety incidents is a necessary part of a quality assurance system, particularly an accredited system like the Joint Commission International (JCI). How the implementation of quality assurance systems affects well-being at work and patient safety is unclear. Evidence shows that accreditation improves workplace atmosphere and well-being. Thus, the assumption that an increase in employees' well-being at work improves patient safety is reasonable. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to describe the protocol for monitoring the effects of implementing the quality assurance system of JCI at Orton Orthopedic Hospital on employees' well-being (primary outcome) and patient safety (secondary outcome). METHODS: Quantitative (questionnaires and register data) and qualitative (semistructured interviews) methods will be used. In addition, quantitative data will be collected from register data. Both quantitative and register data will be analyzed. Register data analysis will be performed using generalized linear models with an appropriate distribution and link function. The study timeline covers the time before, during, and after the start of the accreditation process. The collected data will be used to compare job satisfaction, as a part of the well-being questionnaire, and the development of patient safety during the accreditation process. RESULTS: The results of the quality assurance system implementation illuminate its possible effects on the patient's safety and job satisfaction. The repeatability and internal consistency reliability of the well-being questionnaire will be reported. Data collection will begin in May, 2024. It will be followed by data analysis and the results are expected to be published by 2025. CONCLUSIONS: The planned study will contribute to the evaluation of the effects of JCI accreditation in terms of well-being at work and patient safety. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/45200.

Using the SLIPTA checklist to assess laboratory readiness for Joint Commission International accreditation.

Background: The Stepwise Laboratory Improvement Process Towards Accreditation (SLIPTA) helps prepare laboratories in low- and middle-income countries to achieve international accreditation aligned with the ISO 15189:2012 standards. Accreditation by the Joint Commission International (JCI) is among the highest sought by hospitals worldwide. While the readiness of laboratories with a five-star SLIPTA score to undergo ISO 15189:2012 accreditation was recently assessed, the compliance of the SLIPTA checklist with JCI is still unknown. Objective: The study evaluated the SLIPTA checklist's utility in assessing laboratories to meet the JCI standards. Methods: We conducted a detailed gap analysis between SLIPTA and JCI laboratory standards from January 2021 to January 2022. We cross-matched the JCI standard requirements to SLIPTA clauses and categorised each standard into 'met', 'partially met', and 'not met'. We highlighted similarities, discrepancies, and improvement areas. Results: A total of 109 JCI standards were included. The SLIPTA checklist completely met 61 standards, partially met four, but did not meet 44. The unmet JCI standards focused on the quality planning, control, and improvement sections. Healthcare organisation management and quality control processes, including selecting an accredited reference laboratory, collecting quality management data, creating of post-analytical policies and procedures, and validating monitoring systems, constitute the basis of this preparation. Conclusion: The SLIPTA checklist covers major quality management system elements of the JCI standards for laboratories. However, some components should be addressed to assure readiness for JCI accreditation. What this study adds: This study identified additional areas not covered by the SLIPTA checklist that are required for JCI accreditation.

Assessing the Presence of the Joint Commission International Accreditation Requirements in Western Saudi Arabia Hospital Pharmacies: A Cross-sectional Study.

Objective: The Central Board of Accreditation for Healthcare Institutions (CBAHI) the national Saudi accreditation body accredited most hospitals in Saudi Arabia whereas, the Joint Commission International (JCI) a well-known international accreditation body accredited some hospitals. We assessed Western Saudi Arabia hospital pharmacists' knowledge, opinions, and observations about pharmacy-related JCI accreditation criteria needed for hospitals. Methods: This was a cross-sectional survey-based study conducted among pharmacy personnel working in the Ministry of Health (MOH), Military, and private hospitals in the Makkah region in western Saudi Arabia. The present report represents the findings of descriptive and comparative analyses. Comparative analyses were tested by Student's t-test, analysis of variance, and Chi-square when applicable and a P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Findings: One hundred and one pharmacists completed the survey; most of them were from Taif (53.5%) and Jeddah (37.6%) and fewer from Makkah (8.9%). The highest proportions were from MOH (55.4%), private (29.7%), and some from military (14.9%) hospitals. They worked mostly in hospitals accredited with CBAHI (93.1%) than JCI (58.4%) and only (41.6%) worked with quality units. Correct answers on knowledge items ranged from 14.9% to 65.3%. On five-point Likert Scale, they showed supportive ratings on how they perceived the importance of JCI statement provided (overall average score: 3.78) and on how statement criteria are implemented in their hospitals (overall average score: 3.76). Higher proportions of those working in quality units compared to their counterparts were aware that accreditation cycles for JCI and CBAHI are identical (66.7% vs. 55.9%, P = 0.009) and that JCI criteria are more concise than CBAHI (59.5% vs. 52.5%, P = 0.007). Higher proportions of those working in JCI-accredited hospitals compared to their counterparts were aware that JCI criteria are clearer than CBAHI (55.9% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.021) and that JCI criteria are more concise than CBAHI (61% vs. 47.6%, P = 0.012). Conclusion: To a high extent, pharmacists were supportive of JCI criteria and considered the criteria to be implemented in their hospitals. There is a room for improvement to enhance awareness and support of JCI quality criteria among pharmacists.

Postmortem sampling time effect on toxicity biomarkers in rats exposed to an acute lethal methomyl dose.

Regulations often are imposing long postmortem times before autopsy leading to certain toxicity-unrelated changes in biomarkers, which in turn may affect the reliability of toxicity evaluation during forensic investigations. Since methomyl pesticide shows significant toxicity and is frequently encountered in poisoning cases, the current study evaluated different parameters in methomyl intoxicated rats at three different postmortem intervals (Hour 0, Hour 3 and Hour 6). Eighteen adult Sprague Dawley rats were poisoned with methomyl to simulate actual methomyl poisoning cases. The time of death was assigned as Hour 0. The animals were divided into 3 groups (n = 6) to collect blood and tissue samples at the selected time points. Body weight, relative organ weight, protein concentration, methomyl concentration and acetylcholinesterase activity (AChE) were assessed in blood and different tissues (liver, spleen, kidney, brain, eye, and bone marrow) to evaluate the effect of postmortem sampling time. Outcomes revealed significant decreases in methomyl concentration in blood and bone marrow with advanced sampling time (P < 0.001). Similarly, there were significant reductions in AChE activity in the kidney (P < 0.01), while the enzyme activity significantly increased in brain samples (P < 0.05). Findings illustrated the importance of sampling time in toxicity studies because it could alter experimental results and impact consequent interpretations, as well as it may alter postmortem biomarkers in related forensic cases.

Application of the defect management improvement mode under Joint Commission International standard to improve the instrument cleaning and disinfection effect and management quality in the central sterile supply department: a randomized trial.

Background: Professional, standardized, and scientific management of the disinfection supply room is the prerequisite to ensure medical quality and improve the comprehensive strength of the hospital. This study aimed to evaluate the application of the defect management improvement mode of the Joint Commission International (JCI) standard in improving the cleaning and disinfection effect as well as the management quality of instruments in the central sterile supply department (CSSD). Methods: From January 2020 to December 2020, 32 medical staff in the hospital CSSD were divided into control and observation groups according to the random number table method, with 16 staff members in each group. The control group adopted the standardized management mode and the observation group adopted the defect management improvement mode based on the JCI standard. During the management period, we compared the disinfection effect and incidence of adverse events of the instruments and articles in the CSSD of the two groups, and evaluated the work and satisfaction of both groups of subjects. Linear correlation analysis and multiple linear regression analysis were used to determine the influencing factors of satisfaction. Results: During the standardized management, the instruments and articles were used 611 times in the control group and 602 times in the observation group. The cleaning qualified rate, infection awareness rate, standard implementation rate, hand hygiene implementation rate, theoretical knowledge score, and practical operation ability of the observation group were significantly higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of adverse events in the observation group was significantly lower compared to the control group (P<0.05), and the satisfaction scores of the observation group were significantly higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). The total satisfaction score is independently related to the training method, educational background, and professional title. Conclusions: Adopting the defect management improvement mode under the JCI standard for CSSD is conducive to improving the cleaning effect of instruments, enhancing the work situation and job satisfaction of medical staff, and reducing the incidence of adverse events. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2100053068.

A case study exploring the impact of JCI standards implementation on staff productivity and motivation at the laboratory and blood bank.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Quality of care has transformed to become an essential element of healthcare service delivery, which caused decision makers in Health Care Organisations (HCOs) to seek methods to evaluate the level of care provided. The field of accreditation is under massive development, especially in healthcare organizations. Joint Commission International (JCI) accreditation is one of the accreditation bodies that require a lot of documentation and quality improvement to guarantee proper standard application. The process of accreditation is known to be demanding and requires staff involvement to guarantee successful implementation. METHODS: This study focuses on the impact of JCI standards implementation on staff productivity and motivation in a 350-bed hospital. An interpretive approach was used to collect empirical data by interpreting the population's behavior, which is represented in this study by the questionnaire. The study is considered an emergent study that identified, explained, illustrated, and developed a model of staff motivation. In this type of study, the process of inquiry, supporting arguments, and questions of interest is developed after the launching of the study and during the process of data collection. Thus, the researcher relied on the social constructive paradigm, whereby the grounded theory (GT) is used to build the research model of staff motivation during the process of accreditation. RESULTS: By studying the Turn Around Time (TAT) performance indicator, the study showed that TAT of tests decreased by 3% after JCI standards implementation, which was reflected at two different laboratory sections. The trainings conducted throughout the process of standards implementation also resulted in enhancing the quality of samples, which was demonstrated by the decrease in the percentage of rejected samples. CONCLUSION: Staff productivity increases when JCI standards are implemented. However, staff motivation is dependent on their involvement with management decisions and the smooth transition through change management, which ensures staff retention and therefore increase productivity.

Determinant of repeat revascularization within 5 years of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention at a tertiary care hospital, Karachi: A matched case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine factors associated with repeat revascularization among adults aged 25 years and above within 5 years of first Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) at a tertiary care hospital. METHODS: A matched case-control study was conducted through a hospital records review. A total of 90 cases with repeat revascularization and 180 controls without repeat revascularization were included. Data was analyzed using Multiple Conditional Logistic Regression. RESULTS: The mean age was similar in cases and controls (60.05 ± 10.01 vs 62.20 ± 10.43 years) and sex (male: 77.8% vs. 76.1%). History of being an ever-smoker (40% vs. 25%), overweight (36.3% vs. 30.6%), and poor glycemic control (23.3% vs. 12.2%) were more among the cases than controls. However, obesity (53.7% vs. 44.3%) and pre-diabetes (16.1% vs. 7.8%) were more in controls compared to cases.Upon matching on the time of index PCI, the adjusted odds of ever smokers among patients with repeat revascularization was 2.47 times the odds of ever smokers among patients who did not undergo revascularization. Increasing stent diameter by 1 mm was found to reduce the risk of repeat revascularization by 51%. CONCLUSIONS: Smoking cessation and appropriate selection of stent diameter in patients undergoing revascularization can reduce the risk of repeat revascularization in the future.

Challenges for Joint Commission International accreditation: performance of orthopedic surgeons based on International Patient Safety Goals.

The Joint Commission International (JCI) is a US-based organization that accredits and certifies hospitals worldwide. Among the requirements for accreditation, the JCI emphasizes continuous quality improvement (CQI) with regard to international patient safety goals (IPSGs). Our university hospital treats about 26,000 hospitalized patients and 600,000 outpatients annually, and our goal is patient safety in compliance with IPSGs. The purpose of this study is to examine the activities of orthopedic surgeons in preparation for JCI accreditation, including clear identification of patients, preoperative timeout and marking to ensure correct surgery, timely approval of CT/MRI reports, care with pain management, prevention of infection, setting of quality indicators and daily monitoring, and teamwork. Examiners from the JCI visited our hospital to review medical records and documents, and to interview patients, nurses and doctors. There were 1270 evaluation items covering 16 fields, including reviews of IPSGs, patient evaluation and care, infection prevention and control, and governance and leadership. Most importantly, the efforts of all the medical staff in our hospital in obtaining the first JCI accreditation among national university hospitals in Japan have promoted the safety and quality of medical care from the perspective of the patient.

The Effectiveness of the Joint Commission International Accreditation in Improving Quality at King Fahd University Hospital, Saudi Arabia: A Mixed Methods Approach.

INTRODUCTION: Saudi Arabia has one of the highest numbers of health organizations accredited by the Joint Commission International. This study aimed to measure this process's effectiveness in improving quality at King Fahd Hospital of the University in Khobar, Saudi Arabia. Additionally, the study investigated health providers' perceptions of this process. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This research utilized a convergent parallel mixed method. For the quantitative analysis, an interrupted time series was conducted to assess the changes in a total of 12 quality outcomes pre- and post-accreditation. Thematic analysis was utilized to collect and analyze qualitative data from hospital employees and health providers. RESULTS: The quantitative results indicated that pursuing accreditation positively impacted nine out of 12 outcomes. The improved outcomes included: the average length of stay, the percentage of hand hygiene compliance, the rate of nosocomial infections, the percentage of radiology reporting outliers, the rate of pressure ulcers, the percentage of the correct identification of patients, the percentage of critical lab reporting, and the bed occupancy rate. The outcomes that did not improve were the rate of patients leaving the ER without being seen, the percentage of OR cancelations, and the rate of patient falls. The qualitative analysis suggested that the accreditation process was perceived positively by participants. Nevertheless, participants also highlighted some of the drawbacks of this process, including: the potential bias in observation-based key performance indicators, the focus on improving process without enhancing the hospital structure, and the increased workload. CONCLUSION: International accreditation had a positive impact on quality and was received positively by providers. However, several issues need to be addressed by hospital administrators in future accreditation cycles. According to participants, the most notable issue during the first two accreditation cycles was the increased workload and paperwork, which can potentially distract from patient care.

Impact of Accreditation Certification on Improving Healthcare Quality and Patient Safety at Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare.

Introduction: Accreditation gained worldwide attention as a means of increasing awareness of medical errors, improving healthcare quality, and ensuring a culture of safety. Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare has been accredited by Joint Commission International (JCI) since 2002. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the accreditation process on healthcare quality performance by maintaining compliance with the requirements of JCI's international patient safety goals (IPSGs) over a 4-year period and how this was reflected by patient safety and satisfaction. Methods: In Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare, the six JCI IPSGs are part of the as key performance indicators that reflect organizational performance in different services. For this study, data from January 2017 to the end of 2020 were analyzed apropos performance and correlation with patient experience. Results: The IPSGs data analysis showed that general performance was maintained above the target values (> 90%-96%) in all IPSGs. This was significantly reflected in high patient satisfaction during this period, with Pearson correlation of 0.9 and p < 0.000. Conclusions: Maintaining accreditation status over time enhances patients' confidence in an organization and its leadership as providers of safe, quality healthcare services. However, individual staff perception, commitment, accountability, and responsibility have an influence on performance, the organization's accreditation status, and patients' experiences.

Towards establishment of diagnostic reference levels based on clinical indication in the state of Qatar.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to: 1) evaluate patient radiation exposure in CT and 2) establish CT Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRL)s based on clinical indication (CI) in Qatar. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patient data for 13 CIs were collected using specially designed collection forms from the dose management software (DMS) of Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC), the main Qatar healthcare provider. The methodology described in the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Report 135 was followed to establish national clinical DRLs in terms of Volumetric Computed Tomography Dose Index (CTDIvol) and total Dose Length Product (DLPt). Effective dose (Ef) was estimated by DMS using DLPt and appropriate conversion factors and was analyzed for comparison purposes. RESULTS: Data were retrospectively collected for 896 adult patients undergoing CT examinations in 4 hospitals and 7 CT scanners. CT for Diffuse infiltrative lung disease imparted the lowest radiation in terms of CTDIvol (5 mGy), DLPt (181 mGy.cm) and Ef (3.6 mSv). Total body CT for severe trauma imparted the highest DLPt (3137 mGy.cm) and Ef (38.6 mSv) of all CIs with a CTDIvol of 15 mGy. Rounded Third quartile CTDIvol and DLPt values were defined as the Qatar CT clinical DRLs. Comparison was limited due to sparse international literature. When this was possible data were lower or comparable with other studies. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study reporting national clinical DRLs in Asia and second one internationally after UK. For accurate comparison between studies, systemized CI nomenclature must be followed by researchers.

Impact of repeated hospital accreditation surveys on quality and reliability, an 8-year interrupted time series analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether hospital re-accreditation improves quality, patient safety and reliability over three accreditation cycles by testing the accreditation life cycle model on quality measures. DESIGN: The validity of the life cycle model was tested by calibrating interrupted time series (ITS) regression equations for 27 quality measures. The change in the variation of quality over the three accreditation cycles was evaluated using the Levene's test. SETTING: A 650-bed tertiary academic hospital in Abu Dhabi, UAE. PARTICIPANTS: Each month (over 96 months), a simple random sample of 10% of patient records was selected and audited resulting in a total of 388 800 observations from 14 500 records. INTERVENTIONS: The impact of hospital accreditation on the 27 quality measures was observed for 96 months, 1-year preaccreditation (2007) and 3 years postaccreditation for each of the three accreditation cycles (2008, 2011 and 2014). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The life cycle model was evaluated by aggregating the data for 27 quality measures to produce a composite score (YC) and to fit an ITS regression equation to the unweighted monthly mean of the series. RESULTS: The results provide some evidence for the validity of the four phases of the life cycle namely, the initiation phase, the presurvey phase, the postaccreditation slump and the stagnation phase. Furthermore, the life cycle model explains 87% of the variation in quality compliance measures (R2=0.87). The best-fit ITS model contains two significant variables (ß1 and ß3) (p≤0.001). The Levene's test (p≤0.05) demonstrated a significant reduction in variation of the quality measures (YC) with subsequent accreditation cycles. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates that accreditation has the capacity to sustain improvements over the accreditation cycle. The significant reduction in the variation of the quality measures (YC) with subsequent accreditation cycles indicates that accreditation supports the goal of high reliability.

Improvement of education for clinical nutrition interns based on Joint Commission International standards / 中华医学教育探索杂志

Huashan Hospital became the first Academic Medical Center Hospital accredited by Joint Commission International (JCI) in 2013. The Department of Clinical Nutrition has constantly improved internship education through the introduction of JCI standards. Based on the flexible combination of teaching and practicing modules, clinical nutrition knowledge is closely integrated with professional dietitian skills, and in-depth practical training helps students to acquire much more experience of the occupation as a dietitian. Teachers think highly of students' initiative and knowledge conversion ability, and in the recent five years, undergraduate projects have been enhanced in both quantity and quality.

Improvement of education for clinical nutrition interns based on Joint Commission International standards / 中华医学教育探索杂志

Huashan Hospital became the first Academic Medical Center Hospital accredited by Joint Commission International (JCI) in 2013. The Department of Clinical Nutrition has constantly improved internship education through the introduction of JCI standards. Based on the flexible combination of teaching and practicing modules, clinical nutrition knowledge is closely integrated with professional dietitian skills, and in-depth practical training helps students to acquire much more experience of the occupation as a dietitian. Teachers think highly of students' initiative and knowledge conversion ability, and in the recent five years, undergraduate projects have been enhanced in both quantity and quality.

Study on the optimization of nursing mode for interventional open operation of symptomatic internal carotid artery occlusion guided by Joint Commission International concept / 中国实用护理杂志

Objective To explore the influence of perioperative nursing for interventional open operation of patients with symptomatic internal carotid artery occlusion under the guidance of the Joint Commission International(JCI) concept. Methods The clinical data of 90 patients with symptomatic internal carotid artery occlusion treated by elective interventional open operation from January 2016 to February 2018 were retrospectively analyzed, of which 40 patients receiving routine nursing from January 2016 to January 2017 were set as control group, of which 50 patients receiving nursing guided by JCI concept from February 2017 to February 2018 were set as observation group. The Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) was used to evaluate the anxiety of patients at preoperative 1 h and postoperative 48 h, and the extubation time and hospitalization time were compared, as well as the incidence of complications and the patient's coordination degree. Results The HAMD scores of preoperative 1 h and postoperative 48 h of the observation group respectively was (26.58 ± 5.79) and (17.41 ± 4.18) points, of which the control group respectively was (29.75 ± 5.21) points and (22.26 ± 4.64) points, and the HAMD scores between the postoperative 48 h and preoperative 1 h in the 2 groups were statistically significant differences (t=9.080, 6.790, all P < 0.01), of which between the 2 groups were statistically significant differences (t=2.697, 5.208, all P < 0.01). The extubation time and hospitalization time of the observation group respectively was (3.81 ± 0.62) and (12.97 ± 3.65) d, of which the control group respectively was (4.39 ± 0.71) and (16.18±3.54) d, with statistically significant differences (t=4.134, 4.201, all P<0.01). The total incidence rate of complications of the observation group was 18.00％(9/50), of which the control group was 40.00％(16/40), with statistically significant differences (χ2=5.361, P<0.05). The good rate of coordination of the observation group was 76.00％(38/50), of which the control group was 55.00％(22/40), with statistically significant differences (χ2=4.410, P < 0.05). Conclusions The perioperative nursing based on the JCI concept guidance can relieve the anxiety of patients with symptomatic internal carotid artery occlusion treated by elective interventional open operation, shorten the postoperative recovery time, reduce the incidence of complications and improve the nursing coordination.

Impact analysis of JCI reform on nursing quality based on performance appraisal reform / 中华医院管理杂志

This study described the nursing reform at Ningbo No.2 hospital under the guidance of JCI standards.According to the flat network structure, the quality and safety of nursing management was divided into 18 nursing management committees, each assigned to be responsible for a JCI section with specified performance-based distribution reform.Such indexes as nursing sensitivity were also analyzed. Given the workload pushed up by JCI standards,the performance-based reform rationalized the workload of nursing staff in its performance distribution reform, thus conducive to the implementation of the reform, higher nursing quality of care and less turnover rate.

Global trends in center accreditation by the Joint Commission International: growing patient implications for international medical and surgical care.

Millions of patients travel internationally for medical and surgical care. We found that the annual number of centers accredited by the Joint Commission International increased from one center in 1999 to 132 centers in 2016; there are currently 939 accredited centers across 66 countries. Public health and medicolegal implications related to medical travel deserve attention.

Whose responsibility is medication reconciliation: Physicians, pharmacists or nurses? A survey in an academic tertiary care hospital.

Background: Medication errors occur frequently at transitions in care and can result in morbidity and mortality. Medication reconciliation is a recognized hospital accreditation requirement and designed to limit errors in transitions in care. Objectives: To identify beliefs, perceived roles and responsibilities of physicians, pharmacists and nurses prior to the implementation of a standardized medication reconciliation process. Methods: A survey was distributed to the three professions: pharmacists in the pharmacy and physicians and nurses in hospital in-patient units. It contained questions about the current level of medication reconciliation practices, as well as perceived roles and responsibilities of each profession when a standardized process is implemented. Value, barriers to implementing medication reconciliation and the role of information technology were also assessed. Analyses were performed using univariate statistics. Results: There was a lack of clarity of current medication reconciliation practices as well as lack of agreement between the three professions. Physicians and pharmacists considered their professions as the main providers while nurses considered physicians followed by themselves as the main providers with limited roles for pharmacists. The three professions recognize the values and benefits of medication reconciliation yet pharmacists, more than others, stated limited time to implement reconciliation is a major barrier. Obstacles such as unreliable sources of medication history, patient knowledge and lack of coordination and communication between the three professions were expressed. Conclusions: The three health care professions recognize the value of medication reconciliation and want to see it implemented in the hospital, yet there is a lack of agreement with regard to roles and responsibilities of each profession within the process. This needs to be addressed by the hospital administration to design clear procedures and defined roles for each profession within a standardized medication reconciliation process.