Decomposition analysis of racial and ethnic differences in receipt of immediate postpartum, long-acting, reversible, and permanent contraception.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the factors contributing to racial and ethnic disparities in the use of immediate postpartum, long-acting reversible contraception (IPP LARC) and permanent contraception among Medicaid recipients. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a cross-sectional study using 3 years of national Medicaid claims data to examine the rates of IPP LARC use alone and a composite measure of postpartum permanent contraception and IPP LARC within 7 days of delivery by race and ethnicity. We used a Blinder-Oaxaca model to quantify the extent to which medical complexity, age, rurality, mode of delivery, and year explained differences in outcomes among different minoritized groups in comparison to non-Hispanic White women. RESULTS: Our study sample contained 1,729,663 deliveries occurring from 2016 through 2018 among 1,605,199 people living in 16 states. IPP LARC use rates were highest among Black (2.2%), followed by American Indian and Alaska Native at 2.1% and Hawaiian/Pacific Islander beneficiaries at 1.9%, Hispanic (all races) at 1.2%, and Asian at 1.0%. IPP LARC was lowest among White beneficiaries (0.8%). Medical complexity, age, rurality, year, and mode of delivery explained only 12.3% of the difference in IPP LARC rates between Black and White beneficiaries. Postpartum permanent contraception was highest among White (7.6%), Hispanic (7.2%), and American Indian and Alaska Native (6.8%), followed by Black (6.3%), Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (5.1%) and lowest among Asian women (4.1%). When we examined the use of IPP LARC or postpartum permanent contraception together, these same factors explained 94.4% of the differences between Black and White beneficiaries. CONCLUSIONS: While differences in the use of IPP LARC by race and ethnicity were identified, our findings suggest that overall use of inpatient highly effective contraception are similar across racial and ethnic groups. IMPLICATIONS: When IPP LARC and postpartum permanent contraception are examined jointly, their use is similar across racial and ethnic groups.

Trends in different contraception methods among women attending the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre from 2011 to 2020.

OBJECTIVES: The efficacy and availability of contraception have changed in the last several decades; however, unintended pregnancies continue to be an issue in Australia. This study aimed to describe trends in contraception in women attending a sexual health service over 9 years. STUDY DESIGN: Repeated cross-sectional study. METHODS: Women aged 16-49 years attending Melbourne Sexual Health Centre between 2011 and 2020 were included. Women were asked what methods of contraception they currently use. Contraception were categorised into long-acting reversible contraception (LARC; e.g. intrauterine devices and implants classified as highly effective), moderately effective contraception (e.g. oral contraception pill), less effective contraception (e.g. condom and withdrawal) and no contraception, as defined by US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the factors associated with the use of moderate-high-efficacy contraception. RESULTS: A total of 38,288 women were included with a median age of 25 (interquartile range: 22-29). Between 2011 and 2020, there was a decreasing trend in condom (63.3%-56.1%; Ptrend <0.001) and oral contraception (27.2%-20.5%; Ptrend <0.001) use, whilst there was an increasing trend in the use of LARCs: implant (4.6%-6.0%; Ptrend = 0.002) and intrauterine device (2.8%-11.8%; Ptrend <0.001). Increasing age was associated with decreased odds of using moderate-high-efficacy contraception (Ptrend <0.001). Compared with Oceanian-born women, Asian (adjusted odds ratios [aOR] = 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56-0.72) and Middle Eastern-born women (aOR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.48-0.74) had lower odds of using moderate-high-efficacy contraception, whilst European (aOR = 1.23, 95% CI:1.07-1.41) and North American-born women (aOR = 1.51, 95% CI: 1.22-1.87) had higher odds of using moderate-high-efficacy contraception. CONCLUSIONS: Between 2011 and 2020, LARC use has increased, whilst less effective contraceptives, such as condom and oral contraception, have decreased among women at Melbourne Sexual Health Centre. Further research is required to understand age and ethnic disparities in contraception methods for future family planning programmes.

Is There Still a Role for Sterilization by Tubal Ligation as a Contraceptive Method?

Tubal ligation has been used since the late nineteenth century to control undesired fertility in women. Over the years, there have been many improvements to the surgical technique, and the procedure has become a lot safer. Some recent developments, however, appear to make this procedure obsolete. In the first instance, there is now ample evidence that removing the Fallopian tubes rather than ligating them or closing them provides protection against developing ovarian carcinoma. The many surgical approaches and closure methods are therefore no longer appropriate. In the second instance, the use of long-acting reversible contraception has been shown to be as effective in preventing future pregnancy, more cost-effective and with even more health benefits than tubal ligation or tubectomy. This is especially true of the use of intrauterine levonorgestrel. The problem of regret and request for tubal ligation reversal, where that was performed, is eliminated as is the surgical concern of operating on older women with increased body mass index and medical co-morbidities.

Offering extended use of the contraceptive implant via an implementation science framework: a qualitative study of clinicians' perceived barriers and facilitators.

BACKGROUND: The etonogestrel contraceptive implant is currently approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the prevention of pregnancy up to 3 years. However, studies that suggest efficacy up to 5 years. There is little information on the prevalence of extended use and the factors that influence clinicians in offering extended use. We investigated clinician perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to offering extended use of the contraceptive implant. METHODS: Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), we conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews. Participants were recruited from a nationwide survey study of reproductive health clinicians on their knowledge and perspective of extended use of the contraceptive implant. To optimize the diversity of perspectives, we purposefully sampled participants from this study. We used content analysis and consensual qualitative research methods to inform our coding and data analysis. Themes arose deductively and inductively. RESULTS: We interviewed 20 clinicians including advance practice clinicians, family medicine physicians, obstetrician/gynecologist and complex family planning sub-specialists. Themes regarding barriers and facilitators to extended use of the contraceptive implant emerged. Barriers included the FDA approval for 3 years and clinician concern about liability in the context of off-label use of the contraceptive implant. Educational materials and a champion of extended use were facilitators. CONCLUSIONS: There is opportunity to expand access to extended use of the contraceptive implant by developing educational materials for clinicians and patients, identifying a champion of extended use, and providing information on extended use prior to replacement appointments at 3 years.

Use of etonogestrel subcutaneous implant in Sardinia, Italy: women's compliance and satisfaction.

PURPOSE OF THE ARTICLE: The main aim of the study was to analyze the population of women who used etonogestrel implant, the reason that led them to this type of contraception, and the degree of compliance with it. Materials and methods: We carried out a retrospective study on women who had etonogestrel subcutaneous implant placed (n°47) over a 6-year period (2015-2021). We submitted the women a series of questions by telephone questionnaire (range 10-72 months after placements, mean 40 months) that investigated the comorbidities and side effects related to etonogestrel implant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We carried out a retrospective study on women who had etonogestrel subcutaneous implant placed (n°47) over a 6-year period (2015-2021). We submitted the women a series of questions by telephone questionnaire (range 10-72 months after placements, mean 40 months) that investigated the comorbidities and side effects related to etonogestrel implant. RESULTS: The average age of placement of etonogestrel implant was 33.8 ± 3.45 years. As regards level of education, 16/47 (34%) of the women had a university degree, 21/47 (44%) had a high school diploma and 10/47 (21%) had a secondary school diploma. The 12/47 (25%) of the women were, at the time of the counselling, unemployed and only 8% did not use in the past contraceptive methods other than etonogestrel implant. The 92% of women choose etonogestrel implant because it offered safe, comfortable and long-lasting contraception. Among the main side effects evaluated, we reported spotting in 24 out of 47 (51%), headache in 4 out of 47 (8.5%). The 85% of the women recommended etonogestrel implant to their friends as a contraceptive method, with an approval rating for the implant, expressed a rating from 1 to 10 with the mean that was 7.79, the median 8. CONCLUSIONS: Our results are of interest because they derive from a region of Italy in which the Long acting reversible contraception (LARC) is strongly underused. Etonogestrel implant was a safe and effective, long-acting, reversible hormonal contraception (LARC) and majority of women recommended the etonogestrel implant to their friends as a contraceptive method.

Etonogestrel implant is a safe and effective, long-acting, reversible hormonal contraception (LARC). The majority of women in our study choose the etonogestrel implant for its characteristics; among the main side effects evaluated we reported spotting and headache. The majority of women recommended the etonogestrel implant to their friends as a contraceptive method.

Demographic and pregnancy-related predictors of postnatal contraception uptake: A cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the uptake of postnatal contraception (PNC) and experiences of PNC care across a geographical region of England. DESIGN: Cross-sectional online survey. SETTING: The North East and North Cumbria Integrated Care System (ICS). POPULATION: Women who had completed a pregnancy in the previous 3 years. METHODS: The uptake of PNC by accessed method(s) and the availability of preferred method(s) is described, and adjusted odds ratios are reported for group differences in uptake by characteristics of interest. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Uptake of medically prescribed/administered contraception and uptake of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) during the postnatal period, and access to preferred PNC methods. RESULTS: Although almost half of respondents (47.1%; n = 1178) reinitiated some form of sexual activity during the postnatal period, only 38.7% (n = 969) of respondents accessed a medically prescribed/administered contraceptive method postnatally, and only 15.5% (n = 389) of respondents accessed a LARC. It is a matter of concern that 18.8% (n = 451) of respondents indicated that they were unable to access their preferred PNC. In multivariate analysis, younger age, lower household income, higher multiparity, operative delivery, unplanned pregnancy and not breastfeeding were significant predictors of higher PNC uptake. CONCLUSIONS: The uptake of PNC in this cohort was low, with almost a fifth of women unable to access their preferred method. However, there was some evidence that women belonging to groups perceived to be at risk of rapid repeat pregnancy were more likely to access reliable PNC methods.

Could the contraceptive counselling improve contraceptive choice after abortion? A multicentric study to evaluate patients' perception.

INTRODUCTION: 24 % of abortion in Italy are repeated procedure. The cause of repeated abortion can be traced back to the inadequacy of the contraceptive counseling during the previous admission or to the adoption of an ineffective contraception method. This study aims to evaluate the Italian situation on the perceived quality of contraceptive counselling by patients undergoing abortion. The second aim is to verify if the chosen methods were available for immediate start. STUDY DESIGN: Multicentric, prospective, non-interventional, non-randomized, non-pharmacological clinical observational study. We analyzed anonymous questionnaires on contraceptive counseling and LARC (Long Acting Reversable Contraceptives) availability and SARC (Short Acting Reversable Contraceptives) prescription at hospital discharge, distributed to women who requested abortion. RESULTS: 1074 participants on 15 hospitals through Italy. 82 % of the interviewees reported that they had received correct information regarding contraception. 74 % of the patients who chose LARC methods reported to have them inserted at the time of abortion. 73 % of women who had chosen a SARC method stated that they had received the prescription before discharge. After contraceptive counselling, we reported a significative reduction of "none or natural methods use" and a significant increase of SARC and LARC use compared to before the abortion. CONCLUSION: Contraceptive counselling could allow a better contraceptive choice in patient who required abortion and we hope that future strategies will implement LARC choice. We think that a greater availability of LARC at an affordable price at the time of abortion could improve LARC choice. In case of SARC choice, we have to implement the prescription at hospital discharged.

Provider Perspectives on Analgesic Use in Intrauterine Device Insertion Procedures: A Mixed Methods Analysis.

CONTEXT: The intrauterine device (IUD) is one type of long-acting reversible contraceptive that is becoming increasingly popular among patients and healthcare providers alike, though many are deterred from using this option due to pain or fear of pain with IUD insertion. While the IUD insertion process itself is standardized, the use of pain medication is not. There is a lack of research regarding provider preference in analgesic use for IUD insertion procedures, which analgesics are being provided to patients, and under which circumstances. This study aims to explore which analgesics are being used routinely in clinical settings, which patient populations are more likely to receive or benefit from these treatments, and why. Secondarily, this study aims to evaluate the impacts of provider characteristics such as location of training and practice, length of practice, and type of training in analgesic administration. METHODS: Various national organizations were contacted via email and asked to distribute the "IUD Pain Management" survey via discussion board or email newsletter. This survey was developed to gather demographic information on providers of IUD placement procedures and evaluate trends in analgesic methods used based on provider and patient characteristics. Additionally, the survey included an opportunity for participants to agree to participate in a brief interview to further elaborate on their responses via phone. Survey responses were collected and evaluated on the secure QuestionPro platform. Results from the interview were qualitatively assessed by coding recurrent themes between participant interviews. RESULTS: Survey respondents represented physicians from family medicine and OB-GYN specialties, as well as nurse practitioners, registered nurses, physician assistants, and OB-GYN resident physicians. The average length of clinical practice is 6.7 years. The majority of respondents reported offering some sort of analgesic for IUD insertion procedures, with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs being the most commonly used. Participants also reported an increased likelihood of prescribing analgesics for adolescent and nulliparous patients. Participant interviews included themes such as patient perception of pain, provider training, barriers to access, and alternative analgesic options. CONCLUSIONS: Our study has identified a significant amount of variation in practices regarding analgesic use for IUD insertion procedures and highlighted some underlying causes of these inconsistencies. Future studies should further investigate trends in analgesic administration in IUD insertion procedures with a larger sample size and delve into factors such as provider education and barriers to access.

Precision Identification of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer in Denoised CT Scans Using EfficientNet and Voting System Algorithms.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Local advanced rectal cancer (LARC) poses significant treatment challenges due to its location and high recurrence rates. Accurate early detection is vital for treatment planning. With magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) being resource-intensive, this study explores using artificial intelligence (AI) to interpret computed tomography (CT) scans as an alternative, providing a quicker, more accessible diagnostic tool for LARC. METHODS: In this retrospective study, CT images of 1070 T3-4 rectal cancer patients from 2010 to 2022 were analyzed. AI models, trained on 739 cases, were validated using two test sets of 134 and 197 cases. By utilizing techniques such as nonlocal mean filtering, dynamic histogram equalization, and the EfficientNetB0 algorithm, we identified images featuring characteristics of a positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) for the diagnosis of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Importantly, this study employs an innovative approach by using both hard and soft voting systems in the second stage to ascertain the LARC status of cases, thus emphasizing the novelty of the soft voting system for improved case identification accuracy. The local recurrence rates and overall survival of the cases predicted by our model were assessed to underscore its clinical value. RESULTS: The AI model exhibited high accuracy in identifying CRM-positive images, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.89 in the first test set and 0.86 in the second. In a patient-based analysis, the model reached AUCs of 0.84 and 0.79 using a hard voting system. Employing a soft voting system, the model attained AUCs of 0.93 and 0.88, respectively. Notably, AI-identified LARC cases exhibited a significantly higher five-year local recurrence rate and displayed a trend towards increased mortality across various thresholds. Furthermore, the model's capability to predict adverse clinical outcomes was superior to those of traditional assessments. CONCLUSION: AI can precisely identify CRM-positive LARC cases from CT images, signaling an increased local recurrence and mortality rate. Our study presents a swifter and more reliable method for detecting LARC compared to traditional CT or MRI techniques.

Prediction of pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Purpose: To investigate the predictive factors of pathologic complete response (pCR) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients who had been treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT). Methods and materials: For this retrospective study, 53 LARC patients (37 males and 16 females; age range 25 to 79 years) were selected. Clinical characteristics, baseline mrTNM staging, MR gross tumor volumes (GTV), and pCR were evaluated. The diagnostic accuracy of GTV for predicting pCR was calculated. Results: Among 53 LARC patients, 15 patients achieved pCR (28.3%), while 38 patients achieved non-pCR. Only three (5.7%) out of 53 patients did not downstage after nCRT. GTV and tumor differentiation were the significant prognostic parameters for predicting pCR. A tumor volume threshold of 21.1 cm3 was determined as a predictor for pCR, with a sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 47%. In addition, GTV was associated with mrN stage, circumferential resection margin (CRM) status, extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) status, and pretreatment serum CEA level. Conclusion: Tumor volume and tumor differentiation have significant predictive values in preoperative assessment of pCR among LARC patients. These findings aid clinicians to discriminate those patients who may likely benefit from preoperative regimens and to make optimal treatment plans.

Development and validation of a multi-modal ultrasomics model to predict response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the performance of multi-modal ultrasomics model to predict efficacy to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and compare with the clinical model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study retrospectively included 106 patients with LARC who underwent total mesorectal excision after nCRT between April 2018 and April 2023 at our hospital, randomly divided into a training set of 74 and a validation set of 32 in a 7: 3 ratios. Ultrasomics features were extracted from the tumors' region of interest of B-mode ultrasound (BUS) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) images based on PyRadiomics. Mann-Whitney U test, spearman, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithms were utilized to reduce features dimension. Five models were built with ultrasomics and clinical analysis using multilayer perceptron neural network classifier based on python. Including BUS, CEUS, Combined_1, Combined_2 and Clinical models. The diagnostic performance of models was assessed with the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic. The DeLong testing algorithm was utilized to compare the models' overall performance. RESULTS: The AUC (95% confidence interval [CI]) of the five models in the validation cohort were as follows: BUS 0.675 (95%CI: 0.481-0.868), CEUS 0.821 (95%CI: 0.660-0.983), Combined_1 0.829 (95%CI: 0.673-0.985), Combined_2 0.893 (95%CI: 0.780-1.000), and Clinical 0.690 (95%CI: 0.509-0.872). The Combined_2 model was the best in the overall prediction performance, showed significantly better compared to the Clinical model after DeLong testing (P < 0.01). Both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that age (P < 0.01) and clinical stage (P < 0.01) could be an independent predictor of efficacy after nCRT in patients with LARC. CONCLUSION: The ultrasomics model had better diagnostic performance to predict efficacy to nCRT in patients with LARC than the Clinical model.

Association of Medicaid Reimbursement Policies with Provision of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception in the Postpartum Period, 2012-2018.

Background: To address reimbursement challenges associated with long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) in the postpartum period, state Medicaid programs have provided additional payments ("carve-outs"). Implementation has been heterogeneous, with states providing separate payments for the device only, procedure only, or both the device and procedure. Methods: Claims data were drawn from 210,994 deliveries in the United States between 2012 and 2018. Using generalized estimating equations, we assess the relationship between Medicaid carve-out policies and the likelihood of LARC placement at (1) 3 days postpartum, (2) 60 days postpartum, and (3) 1 year postpartum, in Medicaid and commercially insured populations. Results: Among Medicaid beneficiaries, the likelihood of receiving LARC was higher in states with any carve-out, compared with states without carve-outs, at 3 days (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.49 [95% confidence interval: 1.33-1.67], p < 0.001), 60 days (aOR: 1.40 [95% CI: 1.35-1.46], p < 0.001), and 1 year postpartum (aOR: 1.15 [95% CI: 1.11-1.20], p < 0.001). Adjustments were made for geographic region, seasonality, and patient age. Heterogeneity was observed by carve-out type; device carve-outs were consistently associated with greater likelihood of postpartum LARC placement, compared with states with no carve-outs. Similar trends were observed among commercially insured patients. Conclusion: Findings support the effectiveness of Medicaid carve-outs on postpartum LARC provision, particularly for device carve-outs, which were associated with increased postpartum LARC placement at 3 days, 60 days, and 1 year postpartum. This outcome suggests that policies to address cost-related barriers associated with LARC devices may prove most useful in overcoming barriers to immediate postpartum LARC placement, with the overarching aim of promoting reproductive autonomy.

Contraceptive content shared on social media: an analysis of Twitter.

BACKGROUND: Information on social media may affect peoples' contraceptive decision making. We performed an exploratory analysis of contraceptive content on Twitter (recently renamed X), a popular social media platform. METHODS: We selected a random subset of 1% of publicly available, English-language tweets related to reversible, prescription contraceptive methods posted between January 2014 and December 2019. We oversampled tweets for the contraceptive patch to ensure at least 200 tweets per method. To create the codebook, we identified common themes specific to tweet content topics, tweet sources, and tweets soliciting information or providing advice. All posts were coded by two team members, and differences were adjudicated by a third reviewer. Descriptive analyses were reported with accompanying qualitative findings. RESULTS: During the study period, 457,369 tweets about reversible contraceptive methods were published, with a random sample of 4,434 tweets used for final analysis. Tweets most frequently discussed contraceptive method decision-making (26.7%) and side effects (20.5%), particularly for long-acting reversible contraceptive methods and the depot medroxyprogesterone acetate shot. Tweets about logistics of use or adherence were common for short-acting reversible contraceptives. Tweets were frequently posted by contraceptive consumers (50.6%). A small proportion of tweets explicitly requested information (6.2%) or provided advice (4.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should be aware that individuals are exposed to information through Twitter that may affect contraceptive perceptions and decision making, particularly regarding long-acting reversible contraceptives. Social media is a valuable source for studying contraceptive beliefs missing in traditional health research and may be used by professionals to disseminate accurate contraceptive information.

Contraceptive uptake and compliance after structured contraceptive counseling - secondary outcomes of the LOWE trial.

INTRODUCTION: Highly effective long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods reduce unintended pregnancy rates; however, these methods are underutilized. The LOWE trial intervention provided structured contraceptive counseling resulting in increased uptake of LARC. This longitudinal follow up of the LOWE study assessed the long-term impact of the intervention by investigating the contraceptive use at 12 months with a focus on continued use of LARC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the cluster randomized LOWE trial, abortion, youth, and maternal health clinics were randomized to provide either structured contraceptive counseling (intervention) or standard contraceptive counseling (control). The intervention consisted of an educational video on contraceptive methods, key questions asked by the health care provider, a tiered effectiveness chart and a box of contraceptive models. Women ≥ age 18, who were sexually active or planned to be in the upcoming 6 months, could participate in the study. We assessed self-reported contraceptive use at three, six and 12 months. Contraceptive choice and switches were analyzed with descriptive statistics. Contraceptive use at 12 months and continued use of LARC were analyzed using mixed logistic regressions, with clinic included as a random effect. Analysis with imputed values were performed for missing data to test the robustness of results. RESULTS: Overall, at 12 months, women in the intervention group were more likely to be using a LARC method (aOR 1.90, 95% CI: 1.31-2.76) and less likely to be using a short-acting reversible contraceptive (SARC) method (aOR 0.66, 95% CI: 0.46-0.93) compared to the control group. Women counseled at abortion (aOR 2.97, 95% CI: 1.36-6.75) and youth clinics (aOR 1.81, 95% CI: 1.08-3.03) were more likely to be using a LARC method, while no significant difference was seen in maternal health clinics (aOR 1.84, 95% CI: 0.96-3.66). Among women initiating LARC, continuation rates at 12 months did not differ between study groups (63.9% vs. 63.7%). The most common reasons for contraceptive discontinuation were wish for pregnancy, followed by irregular bleeding, and mood changes. CONCLUSIONS: The LOWE trial intervention resulted in increased LARC use also at 12 months. Strategies on how to sustain LARC use needs to be further investigated.

Increasing Access to Contraception: Examining Barriers and Facilitators of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception.

Objective(s): To identify barriers and facilitators related to reimbursement processes, device acquisition costs, stocking, and supply of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) from 27 jurisdictions (26 states/1 territory) participating in the Increasing Access to Contraception Learning Community from 2016 to 2018. Materials and Methods: A descriptive study using qualitative data collected through 27 semistructured key informant interviews was conducted during the final year of the learning community among all jurisdictional teams. Excerpts were extracted and coded by theme, then summarized as barriers or facilitators using implementation science methods. Results: Most jurisdictions (89%) identified barriers to reimbursement processes, device acquisition, stocking, and supply of LARC devices, and 85% of jurisdictions identified facilitators for these domains. Payment methodology challenges and lack of billing and coding processes were identified as the most common barriers to reimbursement processes. Device acquisition cost challenges and lack of delivery facility protocols for billing were the most common barriers to device acquisition, stocking, and supply of LARC. The most common facilitator of reimbursement processes was expanded payment methodology options, whereas supplemental funding for acquisition costs and protocol development were identified as the most common facilitators of device acquisition, stocking, and supply. Conclusion: Revised payment methodologies and broader health systems changes including additional funding sources and protocols for billing, stocking, and supply were used by learning community jurisdictions to address identified barriers. The learning community framework offers a forum for information exchange, peer-to-peer learning, and sharing of best practices to support jurisdictions in addressing identified barriers and facilitators affecting contraception access.

The Impact of Get It? on Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Use Among Adolescents and Young Adults.

OBJECTIVE: Long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) are the most effective contraceptive method to decrease pregnancy rates among adolescents and young adults (AYAs). Get It? (www.getitnobaby.com) is an innovative peer-based digital intervention that aims to increase LARC awareness and use among AYAs. The purpose of this study was to describe the impact of Get It? on LARC awareness and use among AYAs after exposure. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted between 2 different Baylor College of Medicine Teen Health Clinics. Using a block randomization method, clinics were randomized to either the intervention or control group by week. Baseline and post-intervention surveys were conducted in addition to a 6-month post-intervention chart review to determine the primary outcome of LARC uptake and secondary outcomes including other LARC-specific behaviors and LARC attitudes. RESULTS: A total of 233 AYAs agreed to participate in the study, of which 134 were randomized to the control group and 99 to the intervention group. Initiation of LARC discussion with the provider was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group. Additionally, LARC uptake within 6 months after study was almost significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group. Finally, intervention group respondents exhibited strong positive attitudes toward Get It? with regard to specific intervention components. CONCLUSION: This study supports Get It? as a tool to educate and motivate AYA girls to use the most effective form of birth control available to them. The digital format of this novel peer-based approach also contributes to the potential of this educational intervention by decreasing barriers to both dissemination and uptake. We recommend a larger multi-institutional study to confirm these results and determine the most efficient method of dissemination to reach at-risk AYAs before coitarche.

Computed Diffusion-Weighted Images of Rectal Cancer: Image Quality, Restaging, and Treatment Response after Neoadjuvant Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Computed diffusion-weighted images (cDWI) of random b value could be derived from acquired DWI (aDWI) with at least two different b values. However, its comparison between aDWI and cDWI images in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients after neoadjuvant therapy (NT) is needed. PURPOSE: To compare the cDWI and aDWI in image quality, restaging, and treatment response of LARC after NT. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. POPULATION: Eighty-seven consecutive patients. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3.0 T/DWI. ASSESSMENT: All patients underwent two DWI sequences, including conventional acquisition with b = 0 and 1000 s/mm2 (aDWIb1000 ) and another with b = 0 and 700 s/mm2 on a 3.0-T MR scanner. The images of the latter were used to compute the diffusion images with b = 1000 s/mm2 (cDWIb1000 ). Four radiologists with 3, 4, 14, and 25 years of experience evaluated the images to compare the image quality, TN restaging performance, and treatment response between aDWIb1000 and cDWIb1000 . STATISTICAL TESTS: Interclass correlation coefficients, weighted κ coefficient, paired Wilcoxon, and McNemar or Fisher test were used. A significance level of 0.05 was used. RESULTS: The cDWIb1000 images were superior to the aDWIb1000 ones in both subjective and objective image quality. In T restaging, the overall diagnostic accuracy of cDWIb1000 images was higher than that of aDWIb1000 images (57.47% vs. 49.43%, P = 0.289 for the inexperienced radiologist; 77.01% vs. 63.22%, significant for the experienced radiologist), with better sensitivity in determining ypT0-Tis tumors. Additionally, it increased the sensitivity in detecting ypT2 tumors for the inexperienced radiologist and ypT3 tumors for the experienced radiologist. N restaging and treatment response were found to be similar between two sequences for both radiologists. DATA CONCLUSION: Compared to aDWIb1000 images, the computed ones might serve as a wise approach, providing comparable or better image quality, restaging performance, and treatment response assessment for LARC after NT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.

Factors Predicting Removals of the Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System in an Adolescent Cohort.

OBJECTIVE: Use of 52-mg levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in adolescents for heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB), dysmenorrhea, and contraception has increased, yet little is known about the factors predicting removal and dissatisfaction in adolescents. The aim of this study was to identify factors predicting LNG-IUS removal in adolescents. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study including all adolescents (9-19 years) who underwent LNG-IUS insertion between 2012 and 2021 (n = 536). A medical record review was conducted and data were collated on medical and gynecological history, age, indications for insertion, complications, expulsions, and removals. The data were analyzed using χ2 tests. RESULTS: Indications for LNG-IUS insertions (n = 536) among 517 individual patients (n = 517) included menstrual management (n = 142), HMB alone (n = 118), HMB and pelvic pain/dysmenorrhea (n = 105), dysmenorrhea/pelvic pain alone (n = 47), and contraception (n = 16). Associated diagnoses included intellectual disability (44.29%, 229/517), chronic pain conditions (12.77%, 66/517), and additional mental health concerns (24.37%, 126/517). Patient dissatisfaction with LNG-IUS led to removal in 61 (11.38%), mostly for pain or persistent bleeding. Higher removal rates occurred in those with associated chronic pain conditions (46.97%, χ2 = 55.9, P < .05), mental health concerns (16.67%, χ2 = 5.06, P < .05), and bleeding disorders (26.32%, χ2 = 5.09, P < .05). Among the cohort with an intellectual disability, lower rates of removal occurred (5.7%, χ2 = 11.2, P < .05). Whereas the LNG-IUS removal rate among gender-diverse youth was 23.07%, this was not statistically significant. Younger age was also not associated with a statistically significant increase in removals (13.72%, χ2 = 0.73, P > .05). DISCUSSION: Adolescents have a low dissatisfaction and removal rate (11.38%) of LNG-IUS. Chronic pain, bleeding tendency, and mental health concerns are associated with higher removal rates and intellectual disability with lower rates. These findings are useful in counselling patients and families about LNG-IUS.

Perceptions of access to long-acting reversible contraception removal among women in Burkina Faso.

OBJECTIVES: Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) initiation has been well-studied and intervened upon. Because LARC requires provider intervention for initiation and removal, it is critical to measure informed choice at the time of desired discontinuation as well. We examined perceptions of access to LARC discontinuation among women at two sites in Burkina Faso, where LARC is the dominant method in the contraceptive mix. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed data from a 2017-2018 population-based, cross-sectional survey of 281 implant users and 55 intrauterine device users at two sites in Burkina Faso. We measured perceptions of access to LARC discontinuation through survey items assessing whether participants (1) were informed on how to discontinue the method, (2) believed they could have LARC removed without a lot of difficulty, (3) believed cost would be a barrier to discontinuation, (4) had ever attempted to have a provider remove LARC, and (5) successfully had LARC removed. The distribution of these measures was examined in the population and for differences by gravida, parity, domestic partnership, fertility desires, and recency of last childbirth. RESULTS: Thirty-eight (11%) of current LARC users reported that they were not informed on how to discontinue, 56 (17%) believed having their device removed would be difficult, and 54 (16%) believed cost would be a barrier to removal. Of women who attempted removal, providers did not immediately remove LARC on request for 10 (28%). CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate that LARC uptake is an insufficient measure of reproductive access or choice. Future studies should include patient-centered measures that span the full duration of contraceptive use. IMPLICATIONS: This paper finds that a sizable proportion of LARC users lack information about method discontinuation and perceive or experience barriers to method removal. These findings call for a reconsideration of free and informed contraceptive choice to include the entire duration of contraceptive use, not only the time of method provision.

Predictive Value of the Interaction between CEA and Hemoglobin in Neoadjuvant CCRT Outcomes in Rectal Cancer Patients.

The adoption of neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has reshaped the therapeutic landscape, but response prediction remains challenging. This study investigates the interaction between pre-CCRT carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and post-CCRT hemoglobin (Hb) levels in predicting the response of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) to CCRT. Retrospective data from 93 rectal cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant CCRT were analyzed. Univariate analyses assessed clinical factors associated with tumor regression grade (TRG) and T-stage outcomes. Machine learning identified predictive biomarkers. Interaction effects between CEA and Hb were explored through subgroup analyses. Post-CCRT Hb varied between pre-CCRT CEA groups. The interaction between pre-CCRT CEA and post-CCRT Hb influenced TRG. Males with normal pre-CCRT CEA and anemia showed better treatment responses. Females with elevated pre-CCRT CEA and post-CCRT anemia exhibited poorer responses. The interaction effect between them was significant, indicating that their relationship with TRG was not additive. Inflammatory biomarkers, WBC, neutrophil count, and post-CCRT platelet level correlated with CCRT response. Contrasting with previous findings, anemia was a predictor of better treatment response in males with normal pre-CCRT CEA. The interaction between pre-CCRT CEA and post-CCRT Hb levels predicts the response of LARC to CCRT. CEA, Hb, and sex should be considered when assessing treatment response. Inflammatory biomarkers contribute to response prediction. Understanding these complex relationships can enhance personalized treatment approaches in rectal cancer patients.