Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery (LESS) for Right Donor Nephrectomy in a Patient With Situs Inverses Totalis: A Novel Approach for Such a Case.

Situs inversus totalis (SIT) is a rare congenital condition where the organs of the thorax and abdomen are arranged in a mirror image reversal of their normal position. Patients with SIT present unique challenges in surgical procedures, particularly in laparoscopic surgeries, due to the need to reverse the operator's perspective, technical difficulty in handling the instruments, anatomical variations, and an increased risk of intraoperative complications. In this case report, we present the first case in the English literature of a 49-year-old Arabic male patient with SIT who underwent a successful right laparoendoscopic single-site surgery donor nephrectomy. We described the surgical technique used and highlighted the key challenges faced and overcome during the procedure.

Assessing the learning curve for transumbilical single-site laparoscopy for endometrial cancer.

Introduction: Applying transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery to endometrial cancers is worldwide, and the depiction of the learning curve is rarely described, which leads to the vagueness of young clinical practitioners. We accumulated the data to identify the completion of the learning curve by analyzing the operative and postoperative outcomes of the patients with endometrial cancer for transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (TU-LESS). Methods: This was a retrospective, consecutive single-center study of patients with endometrial cancer undergoing standard endometrial cancer comprehensive staging surgery (extrafascial hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy, and pelvic lymphadenectomy) through TU-LESS by an experienced surgeon from December, 2017 to June, 2021 in the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, West China Second Hospital, Sichuan University, China. Results: After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 42 patients were included in the study. The learning curve for this study was evaluated using both cumulative sum (CUSUM) and risk-adjusted CUSUM (RA-CUSUM) methods. Applying CUSUM and RA-CUSUM has grouped 42 cases into three phases. The prior five cases represented the learning period. The following six cases were needed to lay a technical foundation (cases 6-11). The third phase was regarded as achieving proficiency (cases 12-42). The operative time decreased drastically with the learning curve. There were no significant differences in terms of postoperative complications and lymph node retrieval among the three phases. More difficult patients were confronted in the third phase. Discussion: In our study, the learning curve was composed of three phases. According to the results of our study, 11 cases were required for experienced surgeons to achieve a technical foundation.

Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-assisted versus transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site ovarian cystectomy for ovarian mature cystic teratoma. A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) and transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) have shown the prospection as minimally invasive procedures. Here we aimed to compare ovarian cystectomy assisted by vNOTES and by LESS for ovarian mature cystic teratoma (OMCT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 81 premenopausal women with OMCT were randomized to undergo ovarian cystectomy assisted by either vNOTES (n = 41) or LESS (n = 40). The main outcome was the operative time. Secondary outcomes included the length of hospital stay, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, abdominal contamination by teratoma contents, and intraoperative and postoperative complications. RESULTS: There were no intergroup differences in age, body mass index, tumor size, or bilaterality of tumor. The operative time for the vNOTES group was significantly shorter than that for the LESS group (68.41 ± 20.92 min vs 85.05 ± 32.94 min, p = 0.008). The highest VAS pain score 24 hours postoperatively was 1.21 ± 0.48 in the vNOTES group and 2.43 ± 0.57 in the LESS group (p < 0.001). Twenty-four of the 40 patients in the LESS group experienced teratoma rupture intraoperatively, leading to abdominal contamination by the teratoma content, while 5 abdominal contamination was observed in the vNOTES group （p = 0.005. No significant differences between the two groups were observed in the other outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: vNOTES assisted ovarian cystectomy has short operative time, fast recovery, no scarring, less pain, and low rate of abdominal contamination. Consequently, vNOTES might be superior to LESS for treating OMCTs.

Perioperative outcomes of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in hysterectomy: A comparative study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the perioperative outcomes of patients who underwent hysterectomy for benign gynecologic diseases using transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) or transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (TU-LESS). METHODS: A total of 314 patients who underwent hysterectomy for benign uterine disease at West China Second University Hospital between October 2018 and December 2021 were enrolled in this retrospective study. vNOTES (n = 157) and TU-LESS (n = 157) recipients were matched 1:1 in terms of uterine volume. The operation time, blood loss, postoperative decrease in hemoglobin, uterus weight, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative pain score at 12 h, postoperative indwelling catheter time, and other clinical indicators were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: All 314 patients successfully completed the surgery, and the two groups had similar baseline characteristics, with no statistical difference. Regarding intraoperative outcomes, the operation time was shorter in the vNOTES group than in the TU-LESS group (80 vs 100 min, P = 0.04), and there were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative blood transfusion rate, postoperative decrease in hemoglobin, or uterine weight. Concerning postoperative outcomes, vNOTES hysterectomy was significantly superior to TU-LESS hysterectomy in terms of the length of hospital stay (3 vs 4 days, P < 0.001), visual analog scale score for pain at 12 h after surgery (P = 0.04), postoperative indwelling catheter time (39.5 vs 64.0 h, P < 0.001), and postoperative exhaust time (24.0 vs 42.0 h, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in postoperative complications between the two groups. CONCLUSION: vNOTES and TU-LESS seem safe and feasible for hysterectomy, but vNOTES hysterectomy was more conducive to the postoperative rehabilitation of patients, with less trauma, less pain, and better cosmetic effects than TU-LESS hysterectomy. As an emerging surgical approach, more studies, including large-sample, multicenter, randomized controlled trials, are needed to validate our findings.

Comparison of Outcomes following Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery and Laparoendoscopic Single-site Surgery in Benign Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Gradually increasing interest in laparoscopic surgeries has led to the advent of various lesser invasive techniques in the form of vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) and laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery. Very few studies have analyzed the advantages and disadvantages of vNOTES over LESS surgeries in hysterectomy. After a comprehensive search, full texts of relevant manuscripts were obtained to assess eligibility for recruitment. A comprehensive meta-analysis was subsequently performed to compare the outcomes of vNOTES and LESS in hysterectomy, and forest plots were constructed. Four articles were rendered for review (three retrospective cohort studies and one randomized controlled trial). Three studies showed lesser postoperative pain in vNOTES compared to LESS. In one study, postoperative vaginal pain was higher in vNOTES due to additional suture between uterine artery and vaginal wall. The meta-analysis concluded that vNOTES could be better alternative to LESS hysterectomies. However, further large multicentric randomized trials are required for the standardization of the surgical method.

Initial experience of laparoendoscopic single-site radical prostatectomy with a novel purpose-built robotic system.

Objective: This prospective single-arm clinical trial aimed to evaluated the feasibility and safety of the application of the SHURUI system (Beijing Surgerii Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), a novel purpose-built robotic system, in single-port robotic radical prostatectomy. Methods: Sixteen patients diagnosed with prostate cancer were prospectively enrolled in and underwent robotic radical prostatectomy from October 2021 to August 2022 by the SHURUI single-port robotic surgical system. The demographic and baseline data, surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes as well as follow-up data were recorded. Results: The mean operative time was 226.3 (standard deviation [SD] 52.0) min, and the mean console time was 183.4 (SD 48.3) min, with the mean estimated blood loss of 116.3 (SD 90.0) mL. The mean length of postoperative hospital stay was 4.50 (SD 0.97) days. Two patients had postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo Grade II), and both patients improved after conservative treatment. All patients' postoperative prostate-specific antigen levels decreased to below 0.2 ng/mL 1 month after discharge. The mean prostate-specific antigen level further decreased to a mean of 0.0219 (SD 0.0641) ng/mL 6 months after surgery. Thirty days postoperatively, 12 out of 16 patients reported using no more than one urinary pad per day, and all patients reported satisfactory urinary control without the need for pads 6 months after surgery. Conclusion: The SHURUI system is safe and feasible in performing radical prostatectomy via both transperitoneal and extraperitoneal approaches. Tumor control and urinary continence were satisfying for patients enrolled in. The next phase involves conducting a large-scale, multicenter randomized controlled trial to thoroughly assess the effectiveness and safety of the new technology in a broader population.

Ergonomic learning curves on gynecological laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery.

BACKGROUND: Few previous studies have introduced general techniques to overcome the "chopstick effect" in laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS). We aim to investigate and highlight the key ergonomic methodologies for gynaecologic LESS based on the surgeon's hands-on performance. METHODS: The first author surgeon A reviewed and analyzed the LESS procedures performed by herself and how she taught surgeon B from January 2021 to April 2022. The procedures were classified based on technical difficulty and learning periods, and the hands-on technical skills of LESS module were evaluated. RESULTS: Surgeon A conducted 580 LESS procedures, which were divided into the novice (n = 48) and intermediate (n = 33) periods, and the remaining cases were included in the routine period. We formed a special ergonomic LESS operating methodology: Maintain good LESS laparoscopic spatial sensation, keep hand-eye coordination, well cooperation between the main surgeon and the assistant; Experienced multiport laparoscopy surgery (MPS) skills, improve basic LESS technique: grasp, lift, transfer, place, blunt separating, coagulation and cutting. Coordination location, orientation, movements, and flexion or extension of shoulders, arms, elbow, wrist and finger joints; Maintain strength, tension and ambidexterity postures with joint and muscular efforts to control instruments. Surgeon B learned the above experiences by performing 39 LESS procedures under the guidance of surgeon A. CONCLUSION: This educational research sheds light on the common challenges faced in LESS and presents the importance of ergonomic hands-on performance skills in improving surgical outcomes, which could serve as a guide for future training and education in LESS.

Comparative analysis of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus laparoendoscopic single-site sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: A propensity score matching study.

Purpose: To compare the safety, feasibility, and effectiveness of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic sacrocolpopexy (vNOTES-SC) and laparoendoscopic single-site sacrocolpopexy (LESS-SC) for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Method: Ninety-four patients with POP who underwent vNOTES-SC or LESS-SC from October 2016 to November 2018 were included. The propensity score matching method was used for 1:1 matching between the two surgery groups. After matching, the general perioperative indicators, surgical complications, and the subjective and objective therapeutic effects of the two groups 3 years post-surgery were analyzed. Results: After matching, 36 patients in each group were included, exhibiting balanced and comparable baseline data and an average follow-up of 48.6 ± 7.44 months. The operation time and postoperative hospitalization days were significantly reduced in the vNOTES-SC group (P < 0.05). However, perioperative complication incidence was not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05). Additionally, no significant differences were detected in de novo stress urinary incontinence (16.7% vs. 13.9%), de novo overactive bladder (de novo OAB, 8.3% vs. 0.0%), urination disorder (2.8% vs. 0.0%), defecation disorder (0.0% vs. 2.8%), lumbosacral pain (0.0% vs. 2.8%), or mesh complication (2.8% vs. 5.6%) incidences between the vNOTES-SC and LESS-SC groups (P > 0.05). Prolapse recurrence was not reported in either group. The quantitative description of pelvic organ position (POP-Q), Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7 (PFIQ-7), and Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale (PGI-I) scores showed improvement after the operation, but no significant differences were observed between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The 3-year follow-up revealed that vNOTES-SC and LESS-SC had similar complications and efficacy rates. Compared with LESS-SC, vNOTES-SC resulted in shorter operation time and fewer postoperative hospitalization days (corresponding to the enhanced recovery after surgery [ERAS] concept), along with better cosmetic results without a scar. Therefore, our study findings suggest that clinicians should choose the surgery method based on the specific situation, and we recommend choosing vNOTES-SC when both surgeries are suitable.

Efficacy of transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a retrospective comparison study.

Background: Although single-port laparoscopy surgery has been evaluated for several years, it has not been widely adopted by gynecologic oncologists. The objective was to compare the perioperative outcomes and survival of endometrial cancer (EC) patients undergoing transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (TU-LESS) with multi-port laparoscopic surgery (MLS). Materials and methods: This is a retrospective comparative monocentric study including patients treated between December 2017 and October 2021. The perioperative outcomes and survival of EC patients who had surgery via TU-LESS or MLS were compared, by propensity matching. Results: A total of 156 patients were included (TU-LESS vs. MLS: 78 vs. 78). The conversion rate of TU-LESS and MLS was 5.13% and 2.56%, respectively (P=0.681). The operation time was comparable between the two groups [207.5min (180-251) vs. 197.5min (168.8-225), P=0.095]. There was no significant difference between the two groups in exhaustion time, perioperative complications, or postoperative complications. While, the TU-LESS group had a shorter out-of-bed activity time [36 hours (24-48) vs. 48 hours (48-72), P<0.001] and a lower visual analog pain scale 36 hours after surgery [1 (1-2) vs. 2 (1-2), P<0.001] than the MLS group. The length of hospital stay was similar in the two groups [5(4-6) vs. 5(4-5), P=0.599]. Following surgery, 38.5% of the TU-LESS patients and 41% of the MLS patients got adjuvant therapy (P=0.744). The median follow-up time for TU-LESS and MLS cohorts was 45 months (range: 20-66) and 43 months (range: 18-66), respectively. One TU-LESS patient and one MLS patient died following recurrence. The 4-year overall survival was similar in both groups (98.3% vs. 98.5%, P=0.875). Conclusion: TU-LESS is a feasible and safe option with comparable perioperative outcomes and survival of MLS in endometrial cancer. With the growing acceptance of sentinel lymph node biopsy, TU-LESS of endometrial cancer may be a viable option for patients and surgeons.

Gasless laparoendoscopic single-site assisted extracorporeal ovarian cystectomy through the umbilicus for the management of ovarian torsion at 33 weeks of gestation: A case report with literature review.

Ovarian torsion in the third trimester of pregnancy is a rare but potentially dangerous non-obstetric complication for both mother and fetus and presents a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for the treating physicians. A 39-year-old woman (gravida 2, para 1) presented at 7 weeks of gestation. Asymptomatic bilateral small ovarian cysts were diagnosed at the initial presentation. Progesterone was intramuscularly administered every 2 weeks after 28 weeks of gestation because of uterine cervical length shortening. Sudden onset of right lateral abdominal pain was reported at 33 weeks and 2 days of gestation. Emergency laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery was performed through the umbilicus under strong suspicion of right adnexal torsion with ovarian cyst, as indicated by magnetic resonance imaging a day after admission. Isolated right ovarian torsion without fallopian tube involvement was identified under laparoscopic view. The contents of the right ovarian cyst were aspirated after confirming resumption of color tone of the right ovary after detorsion. Then, the right adnexal tissue was grasped through the umbilicus, followed by a successful ovarian cystectomy under direct vision. Tocolysis was postoperatively attempted by intravenous ritodorine hydrochloride and magnesium sulfate administration, which was continued through to 36 weeks and 4 days of gestation, because of increased uterine contraction frequency. The next day, spontaneous labor occurred, followed by the vaginal delivery of a healthy 2108-g female infant. The postnatal course was uneventful. Transumbilical LESS-assisted extracorporeal ovarian cystectomy is a feasible and minimally invasive option for ovarian torsion management in the third trimester of pregnancy.

Transvaginal natural orifice endoscopic surgery for ovarian cystectomy: a more suitable surgical approach for the day-care procedure.

Introduction: Although previous studies have shown that vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) has the advantages of causing less pain, faster recovery, and better concealment of surgical incisions, which aligns with the concept of the day-care procedure, this approach poses a greater risk of damaging adjacent organs (i. e., rectum and bladder) due to its anatomical specificity. Moreover, the day-care procedure may lead to relatively less preoperative evaluation and postoperative care. Hence, it is necessary to explore the safety and effectiveness of vNOTES for ovarian cystectomy in the day-care procedure, to provide a theoretical basis for the wider development of vNOTES surgery. Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 131 patients at our hospital who underwent ovarian cystectomy from September 2021 to October 2022. Based on the surgical approach, patients were classified into transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) and vNOTES groups. The patients' demographic characteristics and follow-up data were collected during the perioperative period and 1-month postoperatively. Results: Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery has less postoperative exhaust time, a lower postoperative 6-hour pain score, and a lower incidence of analgesic drug use, with higher surgical conversion incidence. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the surgical conversion, chocolate cyst, bilateral cyst, and pelvic adhesion increased the operation duration by ~43 (95% CI: 10.309, 68.152, p < 0.001), 15 (95% CI: 6.342, 45.961, p = 0.036), 10 (95% CI: 3.07, 40.166, p = 0.019), and 8 (95% CI: 4.555, 26.779, p = 0.035) min, respectively. Interestingly, vNOTES decreased the operation duration by ~8.5 min (95% CI: -18.313, -2.699, p = 0.033). Conclusion: Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery was equally safe and effective for ovarian cystectomy compared to LESS. vNOTES aligned with the concept of the day-care procedure due to its reduced postoperative pain, shorter exhaust time, and absence of scarring. However, surgeons should conduct a comprehensive preoperative evaluation and exclude patients suspected to have severe pelvic adhesions.

Technical, ergonomic and cognitive learning methodology in transumbilical single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy.

OBJECTIVE: We introduced learning curves on a detailed step protocol and ergonomic aspect to determine key surgical points in transumbilical single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy (TSPLH) and to popularize both technical and cognitive methodology on laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 87 TSPLH procedures was conducted by a single surgeon in three learning stages. Technical, ergonomic, and cognitive steps were introduced, and surgical outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Key production points in TSPLH include developing a clear retroperitoneal space, maintaining appropriate strength and direction with a vaginal manipulator, coagulating the uterine artery, and applying an improved vaginal stump suturing method. Technical factors included instrument domination, hand-eye coordination, and alternating hand functions. Ergonomic techniques focused on shoulder, elbow, arm, wrist, and finger movements, range of motion, muscle power, continuous forces, and flexibility. Improved cognitive factors such as confidence, decision-making, and communication were also observed. CONCLUSIONS: The study aimed to form methodological education on TSPLH and LESS and benefit more surgeons. The detailed production and key ergonomic points will help guide self-learning and education.

Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Inguinal Herniorrhaphy: Experience of a Single Institute.

Background: Minimally invasive techniques for inguinal herniorrhaphy have focused on developing the laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) procedure to improve cosmesis. Outcomes of total extraperitoneal (TEP) herniorrhaphy vary considerably because of being performed by different surgeons. We aimed to evaluate the perioperative characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing the LESS-TEP approach for inguinal herniorrhaphy and to determine its overall safety and effectiveness. Methods: Data of 233 patients who underwent 288 laparoendoscopic single-site total extraperitoneal approach (LESS-TEP) herniorrhaphies at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital between January 2014 and July 2021 were reviewed retrospectively. We reviewed the experiences and results of LESS-TEP herniorrhaphy performed by a single surgeon (CHC) using homemade glove access and standard laparoscopic instruments with a 50 cm long 30° telescope. Results: Among 233 patients, 178 patients had unilateral hernias and 55 patients had bilateral hernias. About 32% (n = 57) of patients in the unilateral group and 29% (n = 16) of patients in the bilateral group were obese (body mass index ≥ 25). The mean operative time was 66 min for the unilateral group and 100 min for the bilateral group. Postoperative complications occurred in 27 (11%) cases, which were minor morbidities except for one mesh infection. Three (1.2%) cases were converted to open surgery. Comparison of the variables between obese and non-obese patients found no significant differences in operative times or postoperative complications. Conclusion: LESS-TEP herniorrhaphy is a safe and feasible operation with excellent cosmetic results and a low rate of complication, even in obese patients. Further large-scale prospective controlled studies and long-term analyses are needed to confirm these results.

Diagnosing and Treating Infertility via Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery versus Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery: A Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) in the treatment of female infertility. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study includes 174 female patients with a history of long-standing female infertility. We retrospectively reviewed 41 patients who underwent hysterolaparoscopy (HL) via transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) and 133 patients who underwent laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS). Demographic data, operation records, and pregnancy outcomes were collected and analyzed. The deadline for postoperative follow-up was June 2022. All the included patients were followed up for at least 18 months after surgery. RESULTS: Compared with the LESS group, the vNOTES group had a shorter postoperative bowel movement time and less pain at 4 and 12 h (p = 0.004 vs. 0.008); no differences were found in other perioperative indicators. The clinical pregnancy rates of the vNOTES and LESS groups were 87.80% and 74.43% (p = 0.073), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: vNOTES represents a new, less invasive approach for infertility diagnosis and treatment that is particularly suitable for women who have special esthetic requirements. vNOTES is safe and practical and may be an ideal choice for scarless infertility surgery.

Laparoendoscopic single-site radical nephrectomy for localized renal cancer: a descriptive research study with at least a 10-year follow-up.

Background: Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery is performed to further narrow the incisions and reduce tissue injury. It has been more than10 years since the surgery was first described. However, there is still no report on the results of 10-year follow-up. This study evaluated the use of long-term oncology and the renal outcomes of LESS radical nephrectomy (LESS-RN) in the treatment of localized renal cancer. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients treated with LESS-RN at Changhai Hospital from 2009 to 2012. Patients with localized kidney cancer who were followed-up for at least 10 years were included in the study. The baseline data and major perioperative outcome variables were analyzed. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: A total of 48 patients were included in the study, which had a median follow-up of 11 years (interquartile range, 10.7-11.8 years). The 10-year OS and CSS rates were 87.5% [42/48; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.778-0.972] and 97.9% (47/48; 95% CI: 0.937-1.021), respectively. At the most recent follow-up, there were 5 patients with a chronic kidney disease stage ≥3. Among these 5 patients, 3 developed uremia and required continuous dialysis. Conclusions: For localized renal cancer, LESS-RN is safe and effective with excellent long-term oncology controllability and good functional outcomes. Prospective studies with large sample sizes need to be conducted to validate our results.

Zheng's anchor suturing technique for safe and cosmetic umbilical incision in transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgeries.

Transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (TU-LESS) is a new and evolving surgical method suitable for gynecological diseases, because of its minimal invasion and good cosmetic results. However, since the incision required for this procedure is longer than that for traditional laparoscopy, it may be associated with a higher incidence of postoperative incision complications, such as umbilical hernia, infection, hematoma, and poor wound healing. Moreover, the patient may be left with a misshapen umbilicus because intensive surgery is performed through a single umbilical incision. To minimize the incisional complications and meet patients' cosmetic expectations, we designed a novel suturing technique, named "Zheng's anchor suture technique". This video demonstrates the specific steps and shows photographs of patients' umbilici that were sutured by this technique, taken after recovery from various operations.

Visceral obesity as a risk factor of incisional hernia after single-port laparoscopic gynecologic surgery.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate associations between abdominal fat distribution (AFD) parameters and incisional hernia (IH) in patients who underwent transumbilical single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) for gynecological disease. METHODS: Medical records of 2116 patients who underwent SPLS for gynecological disease at Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital between March 2014 and February 2021 were reviewed. Among 21 (1.0%) patients who developed IH requiring surgical treatment after SPLS, 18 had preoperative abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) images. As a control group, we randomly selected 72 patients who did not develop IH and who had undergone preoperative abdominopelvic CT scan, matched to test patients by type of surgery. Total fat area (TFA), visceral fat area (VFA), subcutaneous fat area (SFA), visceral-to-subcutaneous fat ratio (VSR), and waist circumference (WC) were measured at the level of the third lumbar vertebral body on the preoperative abdominopelvic CT images, using National Institutes of Health (NIH) ImageJ version 1.53 k. RESULTS: Receiver operating curve analysis showed that VFA has the highest predictive value for IH among AFD parameters (AUC = 0.749, 95% CI 0.630-0.869, p < 0.001). Univariate analysis showed that age, BMI, hypertension, dyslipidemia, TFA, VFA, VSR and WC were significant factors for IH. In multivariate analysis, only high VFA was identified as an independent risk factor for IH (HR 6.18, 95% CI 1.13-33.87, p = 0.04), whereas BMI, TFA, SFA, VSR, and WC failed to show statistical significance. CONCLUSION: We could find high VFA as an independent risk factor of IH in patients who underwent SPLS for gynecologic disease.

Meta analysis of the efficacy of umbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery and conventional laparoscopic appendectomy in the treatment of pediatric acute appendicitis / 中华内分泌外科杂志

Objective:To analyze the effects of umbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (U-LESS) and conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLS) on the treatment of acute appendicitis in children by using Meta-analysis. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of U-LESS in treating acute appendicitis in children.Methods:The English databases Pubmed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Clinical trials, CNKI, Weipu Database, Wanfang Medical Network Database, CBM literature and other Chinese databases were retrieved, and the relevant literature of the comparative study of U-LESS and CLS in the treatment of pediatric acute appendicitis was found, and the quality analysis and application of the selected comparative studies were carried out. RevMan5.3 and stata software were employed to compare the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative exhaust time, postoperative intestinal recovery time, incision length, postoperative hospital stay time, postoperative complications, etc. of different surgical procedures.Results:A total of 19 literature were included in this study, and a total of 2133 cases were included, including 1021 cases in the U-LESS group and 1112 cases in the CLS group, all of which were retrospective case-control studies. Meta analysis showed that the operation time in U-LESS was shorter than that in CLS (95%CI [-9.05, -3.17], Z=4.07, P<0.001) , and the intraoperative bleeding volume of U-LESS was less than that of CLS (95%CI [-15.28, -5.01], Z=3.87, P<0.001) , incision length was shorter in U-LESS than in CLS (95%CI [-1.40, -1.27], Z=39.30, P<0.001) , the postoperative exhaust time of U-LESS was shorter than that of CLS (95%CI [-8.63, -5.89], Z=10.37, P<0.001) , and the recovery time after U-LESS was shorter than that after CLS (95% CI, 95% CI, P<0.001) . U-LESS and CLS did not differ significantly in postoperative length of stay (95%CI [-1.33, -0.64], Z=5.61, P<0.001) . U-LESS had fewer postoperative complications compared with CLS (95%CI [0.24,0.52], Z=5.27, P<0.001) . Conclusion:For pediatric acute appendicitis, U-LESS is safe and feasible, and has the advantages of shortening the operation time and reducing intraoperative bleeding.

Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for adnexal disease during pregnancy: A single-center preliminary experience.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in treating adnexal disease during pregnancy. Methods: Medical records of included patients were retrospectively reviewed and follow-ups of all the patients were performed until the delivery of the fetus. The clinical characteristics, surgical interventions, postoperative complications, and pregnancy outcomes were analyzed. Results: Six cases were included, with the gestational age ranging from 19 to 31 weeks 1 day. Procedures included salpingo-oophorectomy (n = 3), ovarian or paratubal cystectomy with detorsion (n = 2), and adnexal detorsion (n = 1). The median duration of surgery was 35 min (range, 20-60 min), and the estimated blood loss ranged from 5 to 50 ml. No major intraoperative or postoperative complications were noted. The final pathologic results included high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma, ovarian borderline serous cystadenoma, ovarian simple cyst, endometrioma, and mesosalpinx cyst. Five patients had a spontaneous vaginal delivery at full-term, and one patient had a cesarean section preterm followed by comprehensive staging surgery of ovarian cancer. Conclusion: Based on the data we included, LESS performed by experienced surgeons appeared to be a safe and feasible alternative to multiport laparoscopic surgery for the management of selected patients with adnexal disease during pregnancy. More studies with large sample sizes at multiple centers are warranted.

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery to treat hepatopancreatobiliary cancer: A technical review.

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS), or laparoendoscopic single-site surgery, was launched to minimize incisional traumatic effects in the 1990s. Minor SILS, such as cholecystectomies, have been gaining in popularity over the past few decades. Its application in complicated hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) surgeries, however, has made slow progress due to instrumental and technical limitations, costs, and safety concerns. While minimally invasive abdominal surgery is pushing the boundaries, advanced laparoscopic HPB surgeries have been shown to be comparable to open operations in terms of patient and oncologic safety, including hepatectomies, distal pancreatectomies (DP), and pancreaticoduodenectomies (PD). In contrast, advanced SILS for HPB malignancy has only been reported in a few small case series. Most of the procedures involved minor liver resections and DP; major hepatectomies were rarely described. Single-incision laparoscopic PD has not yet been reported. We herein review the published SILS for HPB cancer in the literature and our three-year experience focusing on the technical aspects.