Stability before and after percutaneous anterior medullary fixation of lateral compression 1 and 2 pelvic ring disruptions: Should surgeons prioritize the anterior ring?

PURPOSE: Surgical intervention for lateral compression (LC) 1 and 2 pelvic ring fractures is controversial. Posterior ring stabilization remains the most common mode of initial fixation. However, greater mechanical instability is observed in the anterior component of LC pelvic fractures. This study tested whether reduction and percutaneous superior ramus fixation will decrease the instability of LC pelvic fractures on intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging. METHODS: All adult patients (≥ 18 years) presenting with either a Young-Burgess LC1 or LC2 pelvic ring disruption treated operatively with percutaneous anterior followed by posterior fixation by a single surgeon from July 2021 to June 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Displacement of the anterior ring to intraoperative manual internal rotation stress examination under fluoroscopy was compared before and after anterior pelvic ring reduction and fixation and prior to posterior pelvic ring fixation. Pre- and post-operative visual analog scores (VAS) for pain were also compared. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients with a mean age of 48.7 years were included. Fifteen patients (71.4%) presented with an LC1, and six (28.6%) with an LC2 injury patterns. Anterior pelvic fixation alone provided 7.5mm reduction in mean displacement of the anterior pelvic ring (pre-operative = 9.2 mm vs. post-operative = 1.6 mm, p < 0.001). VAS significantly decreased from 7.2 one-day pre-operatively to 2.2 twenty-four h post-operatively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Reduction and fixation of the anterior pelvic ring prior to posterior fixation for LC1 and LC2 pelvic ring disruptions substantially improves mechanical stability on intraoperative stress examination. Combination of percutaneous anterior and posterior fixation significantly decreased VAS above the MCID 24 h after stabilization.

Surgical complications after fixation of minimally displaced lateral compression type 1 pelvic ring injuries.

PURPOSE: To review surgical complications after fixation of stress-positive minimally displaced (< 1 cm) lateral compression type 1 (LC1) pelvic ring injuries. METHODS: A retrospective study at a level one trauma center identified patients who received surgical fixation of isolated LC1 pelvic ring injuries. Surgical complications and additional procedures were reviewed. RESULTS: Sixty patients were included. The median age was 61 years (Interquartile range 40-70), 65% (n = 39) were women, and 57% (n = 34) had high-energy mechanisms. Anterior-posterior, posterior-only, and anterior-only fixation constructs were used in 77% (n = 46), 15% (n = 9), and 8% (n = 5) of patients. Anterior fixation was performed with rami screw fixation in 82% (49/60), external fixation in 2% (1/60), and open reduction and plate fixation in 2% (1/60). There were 15 surgical complications in 23% (14/60), and 12 additional procedures in 17% (10/60). Complications included loss of reduction ≥ 1 cm (8%), symptomatic hematomas (8%), symptomatic backout of unicortical retrograde rami screws (5%), deep infection of the pelvic space after a retrograde rami screw (1.6%), and iatrogenic L5 nerve injury (1.6%). All losses of reduction involved geriatric females with distal rami fractures sustained in ground-level falls. Loss of reduction was found to be more likely in patients with low energy mechanisms (proportional difference (PD) 62%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 18% to 76%; p = 0.01) and 2 versus 1 posterior pelvic screws (PD 36%; CI 0.4% to 75%; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical complications and additional procedures routinely occurred after fixation of LC1 injuries. Patients should be appropriately counseled on the risks of surgical fixation of these controversial injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic, Level III.

Surgical versus non-surgical management of lateral compression type-1 pelvic fracture in adults 60 years and older: the L1FE RCT.

Background: Lateral compression type-1 pelvic fractures are a common fragility fracture in older adults. Patients who do not mobilise due to ongoing pain are at greater risk of immobility-related complications. Standard treatment in the United Kingdom is provision of pain relief and early mobilisation, unlike fragility hip fractures, which are usually treated surgically based on evidence that early surgery is associated with better outcomes. Currently there is no evidence on whether patients with lateral compression type-1 fragility fractures would have a better recovery with surgery than non-surgical management. Objectives: To assess the clinical and cost effectiveness of surgical fixation with internal fixation device compared to non-surgical management of lateral compression type-1 fragility fractures in older adults. Design: Pragmatic, randomised controlled superiority trial, with 12-month internal pilot; target sample size was 600 participants. Participants were randomised between surgical and non-surgical management (1 : 1 allocation ratio). An economic evaluation was planned. Setting: UK Major Trauma Centres. Participants: Patients aged 60 years or older with a lateral compression type-1 pelvic fracture, arising from a low-energy fall and unable to mobilise independently to a distance of 3 m and back due to pelvic pain 72 hours after injury. Interventions: Internal fixation device surgical fixation and non-surgical management. Participants, surgeons and outcome assessors were not blinded to treatment allocation. Main outcome measures: Primary outcome - average patient health-related quality of life, over 6 months, assessed by the EuroQol-5 Dimensions, five-level version utility score. Secondary outcomes (over the 6 months following injury) - self-rated health, physical function, mental health, pain, delirium, displacement of pelvis, mortality, complications and adverse events, and resource use data for the economic evaluation. Results: The trial closed early, at the end of the internal pilot, due to low recruitment. The internal pilot was undertaken in two separate phases because of a pause in recruitment due to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. The planned statistical and health economic analyses were not conducted. Outcome data were summarised descriptively. Eleven sites opened for recruitment for a combined total of 92 months. Three-hundred and sixteen patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 43 were eligible (13.6%). The main reason for ineligibility was that the patient was able to mobilise independently to 3 m and back (n = 161). Of the 43 eligible participants, 36 (83.7%) were approached for consent, of whom 11 (30.6%) provided consent. The most common reason for eligible patients not consenting to take part was that they were unwilling to be randomised to a treatment (n = 10). There were 11 participants, 5 randomised to surgical management with internal fixation device and 6 to non-surgical management. The average age of participants was 83.0 years (interquartile range 76.0, 89.0) and the EuroQol-5 Dimensions, five-level version utility score at 6 months post randomisation (n = 8) was 0.32 (standard deviation 0.37). A limitation of the trial was that study objectives were not addressed due to poor recruitment. Conclusions: It was not feasible to recruit to this trial in the current context. Further research to understand the treatment and recovery pathways of this group of patients, along with their outcomes, would be needed prior to undertaking a future trial. Future work: Exploration of equipoise across different healthcare professional groups. Investigate longer-term patient outcomes. Trial registration: This trial is registered as ISRCTN16478561. Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 16/167/57) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 15. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

When older adults with weak bones fall onto their side, they can fracture the pelvis in a certain way known as a 'lateral compression type-1 fracture'; this summary will use 'pelvic fracture'. Pelvic fractures can heal without surgery; patients are offered pain relief and encouraged to move as much as they can after the injury. Pelvic fractures can be painful, and some people are not able to get up and walk for weeks. These fractures can cause health problems such as chest infections, urinary tract infections, pressure sores and blood clots. To avoid these problems, we are trying to find treatments to help people recover sooner. Pelvic surgeons think patients may benefit from surgery with an internal fixation device (a bar and screws) to stabilise the pelvis; however, there can be risks and complications with any surgery. This study aimed to find out which treatment is better for patients and better value for money for the National Health Service. This required 600 people aged over 60, in hospital with a pelvic fracture and having difficulty walking to take part. Three hundred would receive surgery and 300 would receive non-surgical treatment. Over 6 months, participants would complete questionnaires, a walking assessment and have X-rays to check healing. The trial had a 12-month run-in period to see if enough people would take part. The trial closed early as we were unable to recruit sufficient people into the study. Fewer older patients with pelvic fractures were identified than expected, 51% were able to walk after a few days and therefore were not eligible to be included in the study. Of the patients, 13.6% were eligible and 30.6% of those consented to take part. Restrictions on visitors during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic made it difficult to discuss the study with patients' families and fewer patients were admitted to hospital where the study was taking place. The research question could not be answered by this study at the present time.

What interventions add value in lateral compression type 1 fragility pelvis fractures? A retrospective cohort study.

Introduction: Fragility fractures are a large source of morbidity and mortality in the elderly. Orthopaedic surgeons are regularly the main point of contact in patients with lateral compression type 1 pelvis fractures, despite many of these being treated non-operatively. This study aims to identify risk factors for mortality and elucidate which follow-up visits have the potential to improve care for these patients. Methods and materials: In all, 211 patients have been identified with fragility lateral compression type 1 fractures at a level 1 trauma centre over a 5-year period. For all patients, we recorded patient demographics, imaging data, hospital readmissions, medical complications and death dates if applicable. Results: Of the 211 patients identified, 56.4% had at least one orthopaedic follow-up, of which no patient had a clinically meaningful medical intervention initiated. 30-day readmission rate was 19%, and 1-year mortality was 24%. Male sex, need for an assist device, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index and increased age were found to be statistically associated with increased risk of mortality. Patients who followed up with their primary care physician were found to have a statistically lower risk of mortality. Computed tomography scans were obtained in 70% of patients and never limited patient weight-bearing status or found any additional injury not already identified on the radiograph. Discussion/Conclusions: For patients with lateral compression type 1 type fragility fractures, orthopaedic surgeons did not offer additional clinically meaningful intervention after the time of initial diagnosis in this patient cohort. The rate of clinical follow-up with a primary care physician is relatively low despite high rates of medical comorbidity. Computed tomography scans were utilised frequently but did not change recommendations. The high rate of medical complications and lack of orthopaedic intervention suggest that we should re-evaluate the role of the orthopaedic surgeon versus the primary care physician as the primary point of medical contact for patients with these injuries.

Differences in Anatomic Adaptation and Injury Patterns Related to Valgus Extension Overload in Overhead Throwing Athletes.

The purpose of our study was to determine differences in adaptative and injury patterns in the elbow related to valgus extension overload (VEO) in overhead throwing athletes by age. A total of 86 overhead throwing athletes and 23 controls underwent MRI or MR arthrography (MRA) of the elbow. Throwing athletes were divided by age into three groups: ≤16 years (26 subjects), 17-19 years (25 subjects), and ≥20 years (35 subjects). Consensus interpretation of each MRI was performed, with measurements of ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) thickness and subchondral sclerosis at the radial head, humeral trochlea, and olecranon process. A higher frequency of apophyseal and stress injuries was seen in adolescent athletes and increased incidence of soft tissue injuries was observed in older athletes. Early adaptive and degenerative changes were observed with high frequency independent of age. Significant differences were observed between athletes and controls for UCL thickness (p < 0.001) and subchondral sclerosis at the radial head (p < 0.001), humeral trochlea (p < 0.001), and olecranon process (p < 0.001). Significant differences based on athlete age were observed for UCL thickness (p < 0.001) and subchondral sclerosis at the olecranon process (p = 0.002). Our study highlights differences in anatomic adaptations related to VEO at the elbow between overhead throwing athletes and control subjects, as well as across age in throwing athletes.

Fracture displacement of lateral compression type 1 (LC1) Pelvic Ring Injuries: Which measurement methods are reliable and does displacement correlate with adverse events?

PURPOSE: To determine the interobserver reliability of perceived displacement (PD) ≥ 1 cm of lateral compression type 1 (LC1) pelvic ring fractures and to determine if PD correlated with published methods of measuring fracture displacement and adverse events. METHODS: The injury and follow-up radiographs of 10 patients with nonoperative minimally displaced LC1 injuries were reviewed by 27 orthopaedic trauma surgeons to determine if they perceived an interval fracture displacement ≥ 1 cm. Perceived displacement (PD) was compared to 11 measurements of displacement: the difference in heights of iliac crests (IC), sourcils, and ischial tuberosities on AP/outlet radiographs; the distance from femoral head (FH) to the sacral midline and the distance between the radiographic teardrops (TD) on the AP; the distance from the TD to sacral midline and the difference in distances between the SI joints and the contralateral TD on the inlet. The interobserver reliability and correlation of PD and measured displacement was calculated. The association between PD and adverse events was also evaluated. RESULTS: PD had weak interobserver reliability (kappa = 0.46). Many of the measurements of displacement were poorly sensitive for PD. The magnification-corrected AP TD measurement had the highest sensitivity (100%) for PD and excellent interobserver reliability (Intraclass correlation 0.97), but had a low specificity (57.1%). All three patients with PD had adverse events while patients without PD had uneventful recoveries (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: The AP TD measurement detected all cases of PD and had excellent reliability. PD was associated with adverse events, suggesting that accurate and reliable measurements of displacement are warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: Diagnostic.

Union and displacement characteristics following percutaneous screw fixation of superior pubic rami fractures.

PURPOSE: To determine union and displacement metrics following percutaneous screw fixation (antegrade or retrograde) of superior pubic rami fractures. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study from a single level 1 trauma center. Skeletally mature patients with at least one superior pubic ramus fracture present as part of a lateral compression-type pelvic ring injury were included. RESULTS: Eighty-five (85) patients with 95 superior pubic rami fractures met the study's inclusion criteria. LC1, LC2, and LC3 injuries occurred in 76.5%, 15.3%, and 8.2% of patients, respectively. The majority of patients underwent concurrent posterior pelvic ring fixation (94.1%). Superior ramus screw placement occurred predominantly via retrograde technique (81.1%) with cannulated screws of size 6.5 mm or larger (93.7%). Of the 95 eligible fractures, 90 (94.7%) achieved union at a mean of 14.0 weeks (7-40 weeks). Of these united fractures, 69 (76.7%) healed with no measurable displacement, while the remaining 23.3% healed with residual mean displacement of 3.9 mm (range: 0.5-9.0 mm). Multivariable analysis demonstrated a positive association between age (p = 0.04) and initial displacement (p = 0.04) on the final degree of residual displacement at union. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis identified increased age to be significantly related to increased time to union (X2 (2) = 21.034, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Union rates following percutaneous screw fixation of superior pubic rami fractures associated with lateral compression-type pelvic ring injuries approach 95%. Though minimal in an absolute sense, increasing age and a greater degree of initial displacement may influence the final degree of residual displacement at union. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Pelvic binder radiography detects occult instability in cadaveric simulated lateral compression type I (LC1) pelvic fractures.

OBJECTIVES: Occult instability in minimally displaced lateral compression (LC) pelvic ring injuries may have clinical relevance for treatment. We describe two novel LC pelvis fracture stress examinations - pelvic binder stress radiography (PBR) and pelvic binder stress bladder manometry (PBM) - which do not require sedation, anesthesia, patient transport, or radiation of personnel. METHODS: A biomechanical study was performed with five fresh elderly cadavers. Sequential osteotomies of the pelvis simulated increasingly unstable LC pelvis fracture patterns (OTA/AO 61A2.2, 61B1.1a, 61B1.1b, 61B2.1). Compressive force was quantitatively applied using a pelvic binder and scale. Pelvis fracture displacement was measured on AP and inlet fluoroscopic views. Pelvic bladder pressure (PBM) was measured using a Foley catheter as a water column. RESULTS: Fracture displacement strongly correlated with force applied (R2=0.600-0.963). PBR discriminated between simulated LC injuries. Mean displacement of 61B1.1b injuries >1cm was observed at 3.8kg on AP view and 5kg on inlet view. Mean displacement of 61B1.1a injuries >1cm was observed at 8.2kg on AP view and 9.3kg on inlet view. 61A2.2 injuries did not displace >1cm at forces up to 10kg. >95% of 61B1.1a and 61B1.1b injuries displaced >1cm at 10kg. PBM moderately correlated with force applied (R2=0.517-0.842) but did not discriminate between LC injuries. CONCLUSIONS: PBR is feasible, precisely quantified occult mechanical instability in simulated LC pelvis fractures in response to reproducible applied force, and discriminated between simulated LC pelvis fractures. PBM did not discriminate between simulated LC fractures. A clinical trial to validate the safety and efficacy of PBR for assessing occult instability in LC pelvis fracture is warranted.

Comparison of the two surgery methods combined with accelerated rehabilitation in the treatment of lateral compression type 1 pelvic fractures in the elderly.

BACKGROUND: Treating lateral compression type 1 (LC1) pelvic ring injuries in older patients is controversial. This study evaluated surgical treatments combined with ERAS for treating LC1 pelvic fractures in the elderly. METHODS: In this retrospective study, patients who underwent surgery with INFIX (supra-acetabular spinal pedicle screws, and a subcutaneous connecting rod; the experimental group) or superior pubic ramus cannulated screw (the control group) fixation of LC1 pelvic fracture from January 2019 to January 2022 were reviewed. Injury radiography and computed tomography were performed to determine the Young-Burgess classification. All patients performed standardized early rehabilitation exercises after surgery and were followed up for > 12 months. After surgery, the Matta score and the visual analog scale (VAS) were evaluated, and the postoperative weight-bearing time and the length of stay (LOS) were recorded. The Barthel index and the Majeed score were evaluated at 4 months after surgery and at the last follow-up. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were included. Thirty-two patients included in the experimental group had a mean age of 75.0 ± 6.2 (range, 66-86) years, and the other 21 patients in the control group had a mean age of 74.6 ± 4.6 (range, 68-83) years. The mean follow-up time was 13.1 ± 1.6 (range, 12-18) months in the experimental group and 13.4 ± 1.3 (range, 12-16) months in the control group. There were no significant differences in follow-up time between the groups (P > 0.05). The mean VAS score, time to weight-bearing, and LOS were 2.0 ± 0.7 (range, 1-3), 1.1 ± 0.3 (range, 1-2) d, and 5.8 ± 0.9 (range, 4-7) d in the experimental group and 2.3 ± 1.2 (range, 1-5), 2.5 ± 1.6 (range, 1-7) d, and 6.1 ± 1.6 (range, 5-11) d in the control group, respectively. Between the two groups, there was a significant difference in the postoperative time to weight-bearing (P < 0.05), while there was no significant difference in the LOS (P > 0.05). No bedrest-related complications occurred in either group. The Matta score was 90.6% in the experimental group and 90.4% in the control group (P > 0.05). At the 4-months follow-up, the experimental group had a better Barthel index and Majeed score compared with the control group, which were 86.1 ± 6.2 (range, 70-95) vs. 81.2 ± 4.1 (range, 75-90) and 86.3 ± 3.3 (range, 78-91) vs. 80.3 ± 3.9 (range, 76-86), respectively. The experimental group had better early rehabilitation effect than the control group. There was no significant difference in Barthel index and Majeed score between the two groups at the last follow-up (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Both INFIX and intramedullary superior pubic ramus cannulated screws can successfully treat LC1 pelvic fractures and reduce bed rest complications among older patients.

Nonoperative management of minimally displaced lateral compression type 1 (LC1) injuries with comminuted rami fractures is associated with late displacement.

PURPOSE: Rami comminution has been found to be predictive of lateral compression type 1 (LC1) injury instability on examination under anesthesia (EUA) and lateral stress radiographs (LSR). The purpose of this study was to evaluate how rami comminution and subsequent operative vs. nonoperative management impact the late displacement of these injuries. METHODS: Retrospective review of a prospectively collected LC1 database was performed to identify all patients with minimally displaced LC1 injuries (< 1 cm) and follow-up radiographs over a four-year period (n = 125). Groups were separated based on the presence of rami comminution and subsequent management, including rami comminution/operative (n = 49), rami comminution/nonoperative (n = 54), and no comminution/nonoperative (control group, n = 22). The primary outcome was late fracture displacement, analyzed as both a continuous variable and as late displacement ≥ 5 mm. RESULTS: As a continuous variable, late fracture displacement was lower in the comminuted rami/operative group as compared to the comminuted rami/nonoperative group (PD: -3.0 mm, CI: -4.8 to -1.6 mm, p = 0.0002) and statistically non-different from control. Late displacement ≥ 5 mm was significantly more prevalent in the comminuted rami/nonoperative group than in the comminuted rami/operative and no comminution/nonoperative groups (control)(PD: -33.9%, CI: -49.0% to -16.1%, p = 0.0002 and PD: -30.0%, CI: -48.2% to -6.5%, p = 0.02, respectively). CONCLUSION: Late fracture displacement was greatest in the group with rami comminution/nonoperative management. Rami comminution, which has been previously associated with dynamic displacement on EUA and LSR, is also associated with a higher incidence of late displacement when managed nonoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic retrospective cohort study.

Does sequential examination under anaesthesia provide a reliable method to determine a management plan for unstable lateral compression pelvic ring injuries? a prospective study.

PURPOSE: To assess the reliability of sequential examination under anaesthesia (EUA) to determine pelvic instability and to evaluate radiological and functional outcomes in unstable lateral compression (LC) injuries. METHODS: A prospective case series study was conducted from 2020 to 2022 at a university hospital on 43 cases with LC injuries that met the inclusion criteria. Sequential EUA was carried out in three steps. Posterior-only fixation or anterior-posterior fixation was done according to the algorithm. Each patient was followed up for at least 12 months, both radiologically and functionally. RESULTS: Forty cases proved unstable and were fixed. None showed secondary displacement in the anterior-posterior fixation group. However, five cases (19.2%) of the posterior-only fixation group showed secondary displacement with a mean of 5.9 mm. Four cases of them had tetra-ramic injuries. There is a high tendency for secondary displacement at 14.5 mm or more preoperative displacement of the rami. Patients with secondary displacement showed comparable functional outcome scores to patients without secondary displacement. Posterior-only fixation showed shorter operative time, lesser radiological exposure, blood loss and iatrogenic nerve injury than anterior-posterior fixation. CONCLUSION: EUA is a reliable method to determine pelvic instability and management plan for LC fractures with unilateral anterior ring injury. Anterior-posterior fixation is needed if there is a tetra-ramic fracture or initial anterior ring displacement of 14.5 mm or more, irrespective of EUA.

Surgical stabilisation in equivocal pelvic ring injuries - Into the grey zone.

Pelvic ring injuries comprise a spectrum of bony, ligamentous and muscular injuries, described by several common classification systems. However, the majority of injuries lie in areas of intermediate severity, where complexity and variable nature make it extremely hard to define in detail. This fact and associated injuries make it extremely difficult to conduct randomised control trials, with purpose to direct treatment guidelines. Thus, special interest and expertise are required by pelvic trauma surgeons, while surgical indications and fixation methods rely on their experience, at least in part. Namely, a significant grey zone of indication exists. As fixation methods evolve, specifically percutaneous fixation using osseous fixation pathways, some injuries in which morbidity bound with surgical fixation was considered too high relative to its benefits, may be considered eligible for surgical treatment nowadays. Moreover, due to significant progress in the treatment of the acute polytrauma casualties, the survival rate increased over the years, emphasizing the effect of long-term morbidity and functional outcome of pelvic ring injuries. The purpose of this manuscript is to describe the equivocal areas of controversies, hence "the grey zone", and to provide the readership with up-to-date published data. We aimed to collect and detail clinical and radiological clues in the diagnosis of intermediate unstable anterior-posterior compression and lateral compression injuries, and for the selection of treatment methods and sequence. Recent publications have provided some insights into specific injury features that are correlated with increased chance of instability, pain and delay in ambulation. Specific focus is given to the utility of examination under anaesthesia in selected cases. Other publications surveyed the shared experience of pelvic trauma surgeons as for the classification, indication and treatment sequence of pelvic ring injuries. Although the data hasn't matured yet to a comprehensive treatment algorithm, it may serve clinicians well when making treatment decisions in the grey zone of pelvic ring injuries, and serve as a basis for future prospective studies.

The EMS stress view: occult pelvic instability revealed by pre-hospital pelvic binder placement.

PURPOSE: To describe and evaluate the serendipitous pelvic binder stress radiographs of lateral compression type (LC) pelvic ring injuries. METHODS: This was a retrospective case series performed at a single, level I academic trauma center from 2016 to 2018. All patients presenting with a minimally displaced LC pelvic ring injury were reviewed (< 10 cm displacement on static pelvic radiographs). Patients with X-rays (XR) in a pelvic binder (EMS stress) and with the pelvic binder removed were included. Pelvic ring stability was determined by attending surgeon evaluation of EMS stress radiographs versus static XR of the pelvis. Patients were treated non-operatively and allowed to weight bear or taken to the operating room for exam under anesthesia (EUA) and potential operative fixation. Clinical success of treatment was determined by evaluation of further displacement at the completion of their most recent follow-up. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients of the initial 398 reviewed met inclusion criteria. Fourteen of 37 patients (38%) were categorized as stable with no significant pelvis displacement seen on EMS stress and were treated non-operatively without further sequelae (4.6 months mean follow-up). The remaining 23/37 (62%) were treated operatively. Occult instability was identified on EMS stress in 14 (61%) of those 23 patients and the remainder were determined to be unstable based upon fracture pattern or EUA. All patients went on to successful treatment without significant pelvic deformity (7.8 months mean follow-up). CONCLUSION: The EMS stress XR is a valuable, opportunistic evaluation in LC pelvic ring injuries. This evaluation is a useful diagnostic adjunct to alert the provider that additional stress imaging may be indicated to evaluate for occult pelvic ring instability.

Lateral compression type 1 fracture fixation in the elderly (L1FE): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (with internal pilot) comparing the effects of INFIX surgery and non-surgical management for treating patients with lateral compression type 1 (LC-1) fragility fractures.

BACKGROUND: Lateral compression type1 (LC-1) fragility fractures are a common, painful injury in older adults resulting in reduced mobility. The incidence of these fractures is increasing with the growing older adult population. The current standard of care is non-surgical management; however, patients with this injury are at risk of long-term immobility and related complications. INFIX is a pelvic fixation device used in younger patients with high-energy fractures. The device is fitted via a percutaneous technique with no external pin sites and has good purchase even in osteoporotic bone. It therefore has the potential to be well tolerated in patients with LC-1 fragility fractures. INFIX could improve patients' ability to mobilise and reduce the risk of immobility-related complications. However, there is a risk of complications related to surgery, and robust evidence is required on patient outcomes. This study will investigate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of surgical fixation with INFIX compared to non-surgical management of LC-1 fragility fractures in older adults. METHODS: A multi-centre randomised controlled trial of 600 patients allocated 1:1 to non-surgical management or INFIX surgery. The study will have a 12-month internal pilot to assess recruitment and trial feasibility. The primary outcome will be the patient quality of life over 6 months, measured by the patient-reported EQ-5D-5L. The secondary outcomes will include physical function, mental health, pain, delirium, imaging assessment, resource use, and complications. DISCUSSION: The L1FE study aims to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of surgical and non-surgical management of people aged 60 years and older with LC-1 fragility fractures. The trial is sufficiently powered and rigorously designed to inform future clinical and patient decision-making and allocation of NHS resources. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Registry ISRCTN16478561. Registered on 8 April 2019.

Pelvic ring injuries after alpine ski and snowboard accidents.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the patient/injury characteristics and associated hospital course of patients sustaining traumatic pelvic ring injuries after alpine ski and snowboard accidents at a level one trauma center in the Rocky Mountain region. METHODS: Patient/injury characteristics were obtained from patients presenting with pelvic ring injuries after alpine ski (n = 55) and snowboard (n = 9) accidents. Characteristics and outcomes analyzed included mechanism of injury, pelvic ring classification (Young-Burgess and Tile), hospital admission, physical therapy (PT) clearance, ambulation, length of stay, inpatient morphine milligram equivalents (MME), and discharges to rehabilitation facility. RESULTS: Snowboarders were more often younger, male, tobacco/substance users, and more likely to be injured by a fall from height than skiers. There were no differences in injury classification or hospital course outcomes between alpine sports. Most common injuries included lateral compression type 1 (LC1) injuries (37.5%), isolated pubic ramus fractures (31.3%), and isolated iliac wing fractures (15.6%). LC1 injuries were unstable in 50% of cases and associated with increased admissions (proportional difference: 47.5%, CI: 23.8-64.5%, p = 0.0002), longer time to PT clearance (median difference(MD): 1.0 day, CI: 0-2.0, p = 0.03), longer LOS (MD: 2.0, CI: 0-2.0, p = 0.02), and increased inpatient MMEs (MD: 197.9 MME, CI: 30.0-420.0, p = 0.02), as compared to other pelvic ring injuries. CONCLUSION: The majority of pelvic ring injuries from alpine ski and snowboard accidents were LC1 injuries, half of which were unstable, resulting in longer hospital stays, time to PT clearance/ambulation, and opioid use.

The lateral stress radiograph: an effective alternative to examination under anesthesia for identifying occult instability in minimally displaced lateral compression pelvic ring injuries.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to review the practice of utilizing lateral stress radiographs (LSRs) to identify occult instability (≥ 10 mm of dynamic displacement on LSRs) of minimally displaced lateral compression type 1 (LC1) pelvic ring injuries and to evaluate for associations between instability and patient demographics, injury characteristics, and hospital course. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospective registry from 2018 to 2022 identified 151 patients with LC1 injuries. LSRs were obtained in 86.8% (131/151) of patients. Three (2.2%) patients were excluded for malrotation of LSRs, leaving 128 patients for analysis. RESULTS: The median maximum dynamic displacement on LSRs was 12.2 mm (IQR: 5.9 to 17.3). Occult instability was present in 62.5% (80/128) of patients and was associated with older age (Median difference 11.0 years, 95% CI 3.0 to 20.0), Nakatani type 1 rami fractures (73.7% vs. 47.9%, p = 0.001), and rami fracture comminution (Proportional difference 58.7%, 95% CI 42.8 to 71.3%), but not gender, high-energy mechanism, bilateral rami fractures, Denis classification, sacral fracture completeness, or sacral comminution. Patients with occult instability took longer to ambulate 15 feet and clear physical therapy (PT), were more likely to be unable to clear PT by hospital day 3 or by time of discharge, had longer hospital stays, and were more likely to require rehabilitation facilities. CONCLUSION: LSRs were obtained in a majority of patients. Occult instability was frequently present and associated with older age, comminuted distal pubic rami fractures, longer hospital stays, longer times to mobilize and clear PT, and an increased need for rehabilitation facilities.

Bilateral pelvic crescent fracture combined with left acetabular fracture: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Crescent fracture-dislocations are subtype of lateral compression fractures of the pelvic ring, which usually occur following high-velocity impacts. Bilateral crescent fractures are rare entities, with a limited number of cases reported in the literature. Of those reported, none were combined with an acetabulum fracture. PRESENTATION OF CASE: The case involves a 49-year-old male, who presented to the trauma unit after a motor vehicle collision and sustained a bilateral crescent pelvic fracture combined with a left acetabulum fracture. The patient was resuscitated and managed initially according to the advanced trauma life support (ATLS) protocol then staged fixation of his pelvic and acetabulum fractures was carried out. CONCLUSION: Bilateral crescent fractures of the pelvis combined with acetabulum fractures constitute a rare injury. Given their rarity, a standard of care is lacking and has not been described yet. Staged surgical stabilization of such combined injuries is recommended, and may contribute to a better outcome.

A biomechanical comparison of superior ramus plating versus intramedullary screw fixation for unstable lateral compression pelvic ring injuries,,.

INTRODUCTION: Management of the anterior component of unstable lateral compression (LC) pelvic ring injuries remains controversial. Common internal fixation options include plating and superior pubic ramus screws. These constructs have been evaluated in anterior-posterior compression (APC) fracture patterns, but no study has compared the two for unstable LC patterns, which is the purpose of this study. METHODS: A rotationally unstable LC pelvic ring injury was modeled in 10 fresh frozen cadaver specimens by creating a complete sacral fracture, disruption of posterior ligaments, and ipsilateral superior and inferior rami osteotomies. All specimens were repaired posteriorly with two fully threaded 7 mm cannulated transiliac-transsacral screws through the S1 and S2 corridors. The superior ramus was repaired with either a 3.5 mm pelvic reconstruction plate (n = 5) or a bicortical 5.5 mm cannulated retrograde superior ramus screw (n = 5). Specimens were loaded axially in single leg support for 1000 cycles at 400 N followed by an additional 3 cycles at 800 N. Displacement and angulation of the superior and inferior rami osteotomies were measured with a three-dimensional (3D) motion tracker. The two fixation methods were then compared with Mann-Whitney U-Tests. RESULTS: Retrograde superior ramus screw fixation had lower average displacement and angulation than plate fixation in all categories, with the motion at the inferior ramus at 800 N of loading showing a statistically significant difference in angulation. CONCLUSION: Although management of the anterior ring in unstable LC injuries remains controversial, indications for fixation are becoming more defined over time. In this study, the 5.5 mm cannulated retrograde superior ramus screw significantly outperformed the 3.5 mm reconstruction plate in angulation of the inferior ramus fracture at 800 N. No other significance was found, however the ramus screw demonstrated lower average displacements and angulations in all categories for both the inferior and superior ramus fractures.

Lateral Compression Type 2 Pelvic Fractures-A Clinical Study of Fracture Displacement Measurement and Closed Reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the displacement in four lateral compression type 2 (LC2) fracture subtypes (iliac wing and three kinds of crescent fractures) and to investigate the appropriate closed reduction for treatment using a pelvic reduction frame. METHODS: A total of 71 patients with LC2 pelvic fractures from February 2014 to November 2019 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Preoperative X-ray and computed tomography data were used to assess the direction of the fracture displacement and the sacroiliac joint dislocation. The fractures in all patients were reduced with a pelvic reduction frame and fixed with percutaneous screws as well as an anterior subcutaneous pelvic ring internal fixator. Two different closed reduction strategies were adopted, one was first longitudinal traction and then transverse traction, the other was first transverse traction then longitudinal and LC2 traction. The Matta score system was used to evaluate the postoperative X-ray and the Majeed score system was used for follow-up evaluation. RESULTS: A total of 13 iliac wing fractures (86.7%) and 16 Day type 1 fractures (94.1%) were vertically stable with only internal displacement, the ring width displacements were 5 (3, 8.75) and 8 (4, 12) mm, the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) differences were 0 (0, 0) mm and 0 (0, 0) mm. A total of 21 Day type 2 fractures (95.5%) and 16 Day type 3 fractures (94.1%) were characterized by cephalic and dorsal fracture dislocation on the basis of internal displacement, the ring width displacements were 6 (4.25, 12) and 4 (0, 7.5) mm and the PSIS differences were 4 (2, 5) and 0 (0, 3.75) mm. Based on the Matta scores, excellent reduction was achieved in 51 patients, good reduction in 17 patients, and poor reduction in three patients. The average Majeed score was 91.6, with a minimum outpatient follow-up of 12 months (average 31.6 months). CONCLUSION: LC2 fractures involve two different kinds of fracture displacement: internal displacement only and a combination of internal, cephalic, and dorsal dislocation through the sacroiliac joint. Good clinical outcomes can be achieved for LC2 fractures using two different closed reduction strategies.

Unstable minimally displaced lateral compression type 1 (LC1) pelvic ring injuries have a similar hospital course as intertrochanteric femur fractures.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate how the hospital course of minimally displaced LC1 fractures, with and without occult instability, compares with that of intertrochanteric femur fractures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective comparative cohort analysis at an urban level one trauma center of 40 consecutive patients with an isolated LC1 pelvic ring injury and 40 age/sex matched patients with an isolated intertrochanteric femur fracture was performed. Medical records and radiographs were reviewed for patient and injury characteristics, including demographics, displacement, time to surgery, ambulation, physical therapy (PT) clearance, hospital length of stay (LOS), and inpatient morphine milligram equivalents (MME). RESULTS: The LC1 pelvic ring injury group included 26 (65%) patients with ≥ 10 mm of displacement on lateral stress radiographs. The unstable LC1 group, compared to the stable LC1 group, had a greater LOS (median difference (MD): 2 days, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1 to 4, p = 0.0004), longer time to ambulate 15 feet (MD: 1 day, CI: 1 to 2, p = 0.0002), longer time to clear PT (MD: 2 days, CI: 1 to 3, p = 0.0003), and more inpatient MMEs (MD: 386 MME, CI: 225.8 to 546.7, p = 0.0002). The unstable LC1 and intertrochanteric fracture groups had no detectable differences in LOS (p = 0.24), days to ambulate 15 feet (p = 0.46), days to clear PT (p = 0.95), and inpatient MMEs (p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: Patients with minimally displaced unstable LC1 injuries had worse hospital courses than stable LC1 injuries and similar hospital courses as intertrochanteric femur fractures. These findings emphasize the associated morbidity of unstable LC1 injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Retrospective cohort study.