Associated patellofemoral osteoarthritis is not a contraindication for unicompartmental knee replacement. Report of one hundred ten prostheses with an average 6-year follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: Associated patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis (APFJ-OA) has typically been considered a contraindication for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in the treatment of femorotibial joint osteoarthritis. However, this contraindication is being challenged. The aim of this study was to assess clinical and functional outcomes, complications, and implant survival in medial or lateral UKA, regardless of clinical symptoms or radiographic signs of APFJ-OA. METHODS: This retrospective, comparative study included patients treated with medial or lateral UKA regardless of preoperative symptoms or signs of APFJ-OA, with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Intraoperatively, knees were subdivided based on APFJ-OA grade, according to the Outerbridge classification. Clinical and functional outcomes were analyzed using the 2011 Knee Society Score (KSS) at the last follow-up control. APFJ-OA was treated systematically, in a tailored, stepwise fashion according to its severity. Complications and implant survival rates were evaluated. Two-sided paired T-test, ANOVA, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used with a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: Finally, 110 UKAs were assessed 81 (73.6%) medial and 29 (26.4%) laterals. The average follow-up was 6 years (2-19.5). According to Outerbridge, 22 knees (20%) were in grade 2, 59 (53.6%) were in grade 3, and 29 (26.4%) were in grade 4. All three groups showed a statistically significant increase in KSS scores and range of motion. There were no significant differences in clinical KSS improvement and flexion contracture between Outerbridge groups (average 35.7 and -4.9, respectively). Group 3 showed statistically significant improvement in functional KSS when compared to group 2 (68.8 vs 61.2). In maximum flexion, groups 3 and 4 did significantly better than group 2 (20° vs 15°). Three prostheses (2.7%) needed revision after 7, 8.6, and 12 years due to aseptic tibial loosening. Implant survival was 100% at 5 (64 of 64), 97% at 7 (30 of 31), 93% at 9 (14 of 15), and 89% at 12 years, respectively (8 of 9). CONCLUSION: Clinical and functional results, complications, and survival of medial or lateral UKA were not negatively affected by APFJ-OA assessed intraoperatively using the Outerbridge classification after an average follow-up of 6 years. We consider that APFJ-OA is not a contraindication for UKA when treated systematically according to its severity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Influence of Lateral Retinacular Release in Realigning the Patella Between Varus and Valgus Knees in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Purpose: Our study aims to find the role of lateral retinacular release (LRR) on realigning the patella in knees with maltracking during primary total knee arthroplasty. We also compared the patellar morphological factors between the varus and valgus knees on predicting the need for LRR. Methods: We have retrospectively analyzed the incidence of LRR in consecutive 152 primary TKA (124 patients) from May 2018 to December 2018. We have evaluated the preoperative radiological parameters like Wiberg's patellar morphological type, patellar angle, sulcus angle, patellar width and thickness, preoperative patellar tilt and patellar shift, lateral patellofemoral angle and congruent angle. Post-operatively, patellar shift and patellar tilt were measured. Multivariate regression analysis was used to find the association of LRR with the individual radiological parameters. Results: There was no statistical difference in the postoperative patellar shift and tilt between lateral released and non-released groups, suggesting realignment of the patella after LRR (p > 0.05). The morphological parameters like patellar shift, lateral patellofemoral angle and congruent angle were significantly increased in valgus knees compared to varus knees (p < 0.05). The preoperative patellar shift of > 3.5 mm have a specificity of 93.7% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 92.7%, congruent angle > 16° have a specificity of 85.3% and NPV of 4.2% in varus knees in predicting LRR. Conclusion: Radiological parameters of patellar maltracking like increased patellar tilt and lateral patellar shift get corrected postoperatively after performing the lateral release. Patella with Wiberg type 3 morphology, patellar shift > 3.5 mm and congruent angle > 16° in axial view tend to have an increased chance of lateral retinacular release.

Systematic lateral retinacular release does not reduce anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty with patellar resurfacing.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of systematic lateral retinacular release (LRR) on anterior knee pain (AKP), as well as its impact on the functional and radiological outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with patellar resurfacing. METHODS: A prospective randomized study was designed. It included patients scheduled for a TKA procedure with patellar resurfacing, who were recruited and randomized into either the LRR group or the non-release group. 198 patients were included in the final analysis. The pressure pain threshold (PPT) assessed by pressure algometry (PA), the visual analogue scale (VAS), Feller's patellar score, the Knee Society Score (KSS), patellar height, and patellar tilt were recorded both preoperatively and at the 1-year follow-up. The Mann-Whitney U test was performed to determine comparisons between both groups as well as to determine differences' intragroup. RESULTS: Relative to the clinical variables and scores, no difference was detected between the two groups at the 1-year follow-up (p = n.s.). However, there was a slight difference in patellar tilt (0.1º vs. 1.4º, p = 0.044), with higher tilt values in the non-release group. There was no difference in terms of improvement in the clinical and radiological scores and variables recorded between the two groups (p = n.s.). CONCLUSION: LRR in primary TKA with patellar resurfacing does not show an improvement in AKP and functional outcomes over patellar resurfacing without release. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Effect of open-wedge high tibial osteotomy and lateral patellofemoral retinacular release on patellar position: an X-ray imaging-based comparative study.

Background: Open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) may cause adverse changes in the mechanical environment of the patellofemoral joint. For patients with lateral patellar compression syndrome or patellofemoral arthritis, intraoperative management is still challenging. The effect of lateral retinacular release (LRR) on patellofemoral joint mechanics after OWHTO remains unclear. Our study aimed to evaluate the effect of OWHTO and LRR on the patellar position based on lateral and axial radiographs of the knee joint. Methods: The study comprised 101 knees (OWHTO group) undergoing OWHTO alone and 30 knees (LRR group) undergoing OWHTO and concomitant LRR. The following radiological parameters were statistically analyzed preoperatively and postoperatively: femoral tibial angle (FTA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), weight-bearing line percentage (WBLP), Caton-Deschamps index (CDI), Insall-Salvati index (ISI), lateral patellar tilt angle (LPTA), and lateral patellar shift (LPS). The follow-up duration ranged from 6 to 38 months, with a mean of 13.51±6.84 months in the OWHTO group and 12.47±7.81 months in the LRR group. The Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grading system was used to evaluate changes in patellofemoral osteoarthritis (OA). Results: Regarding the patellar height, preliminary analysis demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in the CDI and ISI in both groups (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in changes in CDI or ISI between the groups (P>0.05). In the OWHTO group, although there was a significant increase in the LPTA (P=0.033), the postoperative decrease in the LPS was not significant (P=0.981). In the LRR group, both the LPTA and LPS significantly decreased postoperatively (P=0.000). The mean changes in LPS were 0.03 mm in the OWHTO group and 1.44 mm in the LRR group, indicating a significant change in LPS (P=0.000). However, there was no significant difference in changes in LPTA between the groups, which was contrary to our expectations. Imaging showed no change in patellofemoral OA in the LRR group and progressive changes (from KL grade I to II) in patellofemoral OA in 2 (1.98%) patients in the OWHTO group. Conclusions: OWHTO can cause a significant decrease in patellar height and an increase in lateral tilt. LRR can significantly improve the lateral tilt and shift of the patella. The concomitant arthroscopic LRR should be considered for the treatment of patients with lateral patellar compression syndrome or patellofemoral arthritis.

Effect of Lateral Retinacular Release on Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: When performing a medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction, surgeons may place the MPFL graft under higher than anatomic tension to minimize the chance of recurrent instability. PURPOSE: To investigate whether a lateral retinacular release (LRR) significantly decreases patellofemoral contact pressures after an overtensioned (OT) MPFL reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Mean and peak pressure across the patellofemoral joint at 30°, 45°, and 60° of flexion was assessed in 14 cadaveric knee specimens with intact MPFL, transected MPFL, reconstructed MPFL with graft OT, and OT MPFL with LRR. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to determine differences across states, with W and C values calculated when possible. RESULTS: Mean pressure decreased significantly after MPFL transection compared with intact at 30° (456.9 ± 116.8 vs 410.9 ± 109.4 N, P = .006, W < 7) and 45° (404.9 ± 91.7 vs 369.4 ± 85.3 N, P = .005, W < 5) and increased significantly from intact to OT graft at 30° (456.9 ± 116.8 vs 563.0 ± 11.2 N, P = .003, W < 7), 45° (404.9 ± 91.7 vs 481.4 ± 14.8 N, P = .005, W < 5), and 60° (272.9 ± 139.0 vs 367.0 ± 53.7 N, P = .007, W < 3). Peak pressure increased significantly between intact and OT graft at 30° (1364.0 ± 478.2 vs 2094.4 ± 619.8 N, P = .002, W < 9), 45° (1224.7 ± 491.5 vs 1676.7 ± 779.1 N, P = .005, W < 5), and 60° (1117.7 ± 566.8 vs 1604.2 ± 772.9 N, W < 3). In knees with significantly increased mean pressure after overtensioning, mean pressure increased by 23.3% (11/14 knees) at 30°, 18.3% (10/14 knees) at 45°, and 35.0% (10/14 knees) at 60°. Peak pressure increased significantly by 35.3% (30°), 25.2% (45°), and 29.3% (60°). A significant decrease in mean pressure, toward but not to baseline, was observed between the OT and LRR states at 30° (563.0 ± 11.2 vs 501.5 ± 9.3 N, W < 7) and 60° (367.0 ± 53.7 vs 302.0 ± 13.8 N, W < 5) and a decrease in peak pressure at 30° (2094.4 ± 619.8 vs 1886.5 ± 655.3 N; W < 9). CONCLUSION: LRR led to a statistically significant decrease in pressure across the patellofemoral joint in knees that demonstrated increased contact pressures after an OT MPFL graft. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: LRR after an MPFL reconstruction in which the MPFL graft has been OT may help reduce patellofemoral contact pressures at the time of surgery.

Clinical outcomes and predictive factors for failure with MPFL reconstruction combined with tibial tubercle osteotomy and lateral retinacular release for recurrent patellar instability.

BACKGROUND: Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction combined with tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) and lateral retinacular release (LRR) is one of the main treatment methods for patellar instability. So far, few studies have evaluated the clinical effectiveness and assessed potential risk factors for recurrent patellar instability. PURPOSE: To report the clinical outcomes of MPFL reconstruction combined with TTO and LRR at least three years after operation and to identify potential risk factors for recurrent patellar instability. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of medical records for patients treated with MPFL, TTO and LRR from 2013 to 2017 was performed. Preoperative assessment for imaging examination included trochlear dysplasia according to Dejour classification, patella alta with the Caton-Deschamps index (CDI), tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance. Postoperative assessment for knee function included Kujala, IKDC and Tegner scores. Failure rate which was defined by a postoperative dislocation was also reported. RESULTS: A total of 108 knees in 98 patients were included in the study. The mean age at operation was 19.2 ± 6.1 years (range, 13-40 years), and the mean follow-up was 61.3 ± 15.4 months (range, 36-92 months). All patients included had trochlear dysplasia (A, 24%; B, 17%; C, 35%; D, 24%), and 67% had patellar alta. The mean postoperative scores of Tegner, Kujala and IKDC were 5.3 ± 1.3 (2-8), 90.5 ± 15.5 (24-100) and 72.7 ± 12.1 (26-86). Postoperative dislocation happened in 6 patients (5.6%). Female gender was a risk factor for lower IKDC (70.7 vs 78.1, P = 0.006), Tegner (5.1 vs 6.0, P = 0.006) and Kujala (88.2 vs 96.6, P = 0.008). Age (p = 0.011) and trochlear dysplasia (p = 0.016) were considered to be two failure factors for MPFL combined with TTO and LRR. CONCLUSION: As a surgical method, MPFL combined with TTO and LRR would be a reliable choice with a low failure rate (5.6%). Female gender was a risk factor for worse postoperative outcomes. Preoperative failure risk factors in this study were age and trochlear dysplasia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV; Case series.

Isolated Arthroscopic Lateral Retinacular Release for Lateral Patellar Compression Syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Evidence concerning the role of isolated lateral retinacular release (LRR) for lateral patellar compression syndrome (LPCS) dates back at least three decades. Appropriate indications, execution and outcomes still remain unclear and controversial. The present investigation analyzed the midterm result of isolated and arthroscopic LRR for LPCS in a cohort of patients who underwent such procedure at our institution. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients undergoing isolated arthroscopic LRR for LPCS were identified retrospectively from our electronic database. All procedures were performed by two experienced surgeons. Patients with bony and/or soft tissues abnormalities, patellofemoral instability, moderate to severe chondral damage were not included. Patients with previous surgeries were not included, as were those who underwent combined interventions. Clinical scores and complications were recorded. RESULTS: 31 patients were recruited in the present investigation. The mean follow-up was 86.0 ± 22.8 months. The mean age of the patients at the index operation was 34.2 ± 13.1 years. A total 55% (17 of 31) were women, and 58% (18 of 31) had involved the right knee. The mean hospitalization length was 3.5 ± 1.4 days. At a mean follow-up of 86.0 ± 22.8 months, the numeric rating scale (NRS) was 1.2 ± 0.8, the Kujala score was 91.3 ± 11.3, the Lysholm score was 93.1 ± 15.0, and the Tegner score was 5.0 ± 1.8. At the latest follow-up, 9 of 31 (29.0%) of patients experienced compilations. One patient (3.2%) had a post-operative hemarthrosis which was managed conservatively. Six patients (19.4%) reported a persistent sensation of instability, without signs of patellar dislocation or subluxation. One patient underwent an arthroscopic meniscectomy, and another patient an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. CONCLUSION: isolated arthroscopic lateral retinacular release for lateral patellar compression syndrome is feasible and effective, achieving satisfying results at more than seven years following the procedure.

Lateral retinacular release combined with MPFL reconstruction for patellofemoral instability: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: The role of the lateral retinaculum in patellofemoral instability is still debated. Lateral retinacular release (LRR), has been extensively performed in combination with different surgical procedures, including reconstruction of medio-patellofemoral ligament (MPFL). Despite controversial indications, the results from these studies seem promising. The present study conducts a systematic review about current biomechanical and clinical evidence concerning the role of LRR in combination with MPFL reconstruction. We performed a comprehensive literature research, comparing the outcomes of MPFL reconstruction with and without LRR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The literature search was performed in August 2020. All articles describing the outcome of isolated MPFL reconstruction alone or in combination with a LRR in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability were considered for inclusion. Only articles reporting data on patients with a minimum of 12-month follow-up were included. Only articles reporting quantitative data under the outcomes of interest were included. RESULTS: A total of 63 articles were eligible for this systematic review, including 2131 knees. The mean follow-up was 40.87 ± 24.1 months. All scores of interests improved in favour of the combined group: Kujala + 3.8% (P = 0.01), Lysholm + 4.2% (P = 0.004), Tegner + 0.8 points (P = 0.04), IKDC + 9.8% (P = 0.02). The ROM was comparable between the two groups (P = 0.4). Similarity was found in terms of positivity to the apprehension test (P = 0.05), rate of complications (P = 0.1), re-dislocations (P = 0.8), and revision surgeries (P = 0.1). CONCLUSION: There is no evidence that adding a lateral release impacts positively on the outcome of MPFL reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, Systematic review.

Preoperative Radiological Parameters Predicting the Need for Lateral Retinacular Release in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Proper patellar tracking is essential for well-functioning total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Besides implanting components in the correct position and rotation, balancing parapatellar soft tissues is also important in aiding normal patellar tracking. Patellar maltracking during TKA can be improved by lateral retinacular release (LRR). METHODS: We studied the incidence of LRR in consecutive primary TKA with nonresurfaced patella and posterior-stabilized implant design. We analyzed data from 250 consecutive primary TKAs (212 patients) from January 2016 to May 2016. We evaluated the preoperative radiological parameters like patellar tilt, patellar shift, patellar morphology, Insall-Salvati ratio, femoro-tibial angle, distal femoral valgus angle, and proximal tibia varus angle which predict the need for LRR during TKA. We used multivariate regression analysis to find the association of individual radiological parameters and the LRR. RESULTS: The need for LRR is significantly associated with preoperative radiological parameters like patellar shift and patellar tilt (P < .001). Compared to the nonreleased group, the adjusted odds of LRR were greater for morphological parameters like Wiberg type 3 patella (odds ratio [OR] 17.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 7.21-42.20), lateral facet thinning (OR 4.38, 95% CI 2.37-8.07), lateral patellofemoral arthritis (OR 14.36, 95% CI 6.82-30.23), and coronal valgus deformity (OR 4.95, 95% CI 1.60-10.68). CONCLUSION: Preoperative assessment of these radiological parameters in the axial view implies a high chance of tight lateral retinacular structures. This helps in identifying patients who have a higher likelihood for patellar maltracking during TKA. Appropriate LRR helps to provide better patellar tracking post TKA.

Lateral retinacular release is not recommended in association to MPFL reconstruction in recurrent patellar dislocation.

PURPOSE: Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) has become the gold standard for the treatment of the recurrent patellar dislocation (RPD). Lateral retinacular release can be performed in association with MPFL reconstruction, but the effect on outcomes is not clear. To evaluate the effect of lateral release on outcomes following MPFL reconstruction is the aim of this study. It is hypothesized that isolated MPFL reconstruction was not inferior to MPFL reconstruction and lateral retinacular release in terms of IKDC subjective score and patellar tilt (PT). METHODS: Patients between ages 18 and 45 scheduled to undergo MPFL reconstruction without an associated bony procedure (tibial tubercle osteotomy or trochleoplasty) were randomized to isolated MPFL reconstruction or MPFL reconstruction (no LRR group) and arthroscopic LRR (LRR group). Evaluation criteria were subjective IKDC score as the primary outcome and PT evaluated with a CT-scan. PT was evaluated with the quadriceps relaxed (PTQR) and contracted (PTQC). RESULTS: Of 43 patients included in the trial, 7 were lost of follow-up, 3 were not able to complete evaluation because of medical reasons, and 33 patients were evaluated with a minimum of 12 months and a median follow-up of 24 (12-60) months. The average subjective IKDC score was at 86 ± 20 (29-94) in the LRR group and 82 ± 15 (39-95) in the no LRR group (p = 0.45). The PTQR was at 22° ± 7° (13-37) in the LRR group and 21 ± 10 (4-37) in the no LRR group (n.s.). The PTQC was at 27° ± 9° (12-40) in the LRR group and 25 ± 12 (5-45) in the no LRR group (n.s.). No complications were noted in either group. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences were found in subjective IKDC score or patellar tilt based on the addition of an arthroscopic LRR to an MPFL reconstruction in patients with RPD not undergoing associated bony procedures. There is no indication to a systematic lateral retinacular release in association with MPFL reconstruction in the treatment of RPD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

The Effect of Concomitant Arthroscopic Lateral Retinacular Release on Postoperative Patellar Position and Orientation in Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of concomitant arthroscopic lateral release (LR) in open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) by comparing the pre- and postoperative radiological parameters of patellar position and orientation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was comprised of 19 knees undergoing OWHTO and concomitant LR and 18 knees undergoing OWHTO alone. Radiological parameters for patellar position and orientation included the Caton-Deschamps index (CDI), Blackburne-Peel index (BPI), patellar tilting angle (PTA), patellar lateral shift (PLS), and patellofemoral distance (PFD), which were evaluated in the preoperative period and at one year after surgery. RESULTS: Patellar height was significantly reduced after surgery as indicated by the decrease in BPI (p=0.03) in the OWHTO/LR group, and decrease in CDI (p=0.03) and BPI (p=0.04) in the OWHTO alone group. PTA and PLS were significantly reduced after the combined OWHTO/LR procedure (p=0.04 and p=0.04, respectively). By contrast, no significant changes were detected when isolated OWHTO was performed. CONCLUSIONS: OWHTO induced a postoperative decrease in patellar height in both groups. Regarding the change in patellofemoral alignment, concomitant LR in OWHTO significantly decreased lateral patellar tilt and shift, while no significant difference in those parameters were noted in the OWHTO alone knees.

[Arthroscopic treatment for patellar dislocation with lateral retinacular release combined with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction].

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of the arthroscopic lateral retinacular release combined with medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction for patellar dislocation. Methods: Between January 2016 and March 2017, 28 cases (32 knees) with patellar dislocation were treated by arthroscopic lateral retinacular release and MPFL reconstruction. There were 6 males (6 knees) and 22 females (26 knees) with an average age of 21 years (range, 17-29 years). The disease duration ranged from 2 days to 2 years (mean, 8 months). Apprehension test of all patients were positive. The preoperative Lysholm score was 68.34±12.26. Anteroposterior X-ray film showed the patellar subluxation or dislocation. The Q angle was (17.67±4.21)° and the distance of tibia tuberosity-trochlear groove was less than 20 mm. The femoral attachment of retinacular were fixed by the interference screws (16 knee) or the anchors (16 knee), respectively. Results: All incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 6 months. The function of knee joint was significantly improved at 6 months after operation. The Lysholm score was 92.88±6.42 and the Q angle was (12.15±3.68)° at 6 months. There were significant differences in the Lysholm score and the Q angle between pre- and post-operation ( t=-3.408, P=0.006; t=-2.317, P=0.004). Apprehension test of all patients were negative. No knee pain, knee weakness, and patellar dislocation occurred during follow-up. There was no significant difference in the Lysholm score and the Q Angle between the anchor group and interference screw group ( t=-3.254, P=0.820; t=-3.576, P=0.940). Conclusion: Lateral retinacular release combined with MPFL reconstruction under arthroscopy can effectively improve the function of the knee joint for patients with Q angle less than 20° and TT-TG less than 20 mm, and the early effectiveness is good. There is no significant difference in knee function between the anchor and interference screw internal fixation.

Double-bundle anatomical medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with lateral retinaculum plasty can lead to good outcomes in patients with patellar dislocation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of double-bundle anatomical medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction combined with lateral retinaculum plasty versus isolated MPFL reconstruction for patellar dislocation. METHODS: From 2011 to 2013, 64 patients underwent either double-bundle anatomical MPFL reconstruction combined with lateral retinaculum plasty (Group A, 32 patients), or isolated MPFL reconstruction (Group B, 32 patients). Clinical evaluations were performed 2 years post-operatively and included determination of the number of patients with patellar redislocation, the patellar tilt angle, lateral patellar shift, subjective symptoms, and functional outcomes as evaluated with the Kujala score and Lysholm score. RESULTS: No dislocation or subluxation occurred during the 25-month follow-up. Radiographically, the patellar tilt angle was 6.0° ± 1.7° in Group A and 6.7° ± 2.0° in Group B, without a significant difference (n. s). The lateral patellar shift was 8.0 ± 2.6 mm in Group A and 8.5 ± 2.4 mm in Group B (n. s). The mean Kujala score was 91.8 ± 3.7 in Group A and 91.5 ± 3.6 in Group B post-operatively (n. s), and the mean Lysholm score was 92.5 ± 3.8 and 90.8 ± 4.9, respectively (n. s). CONCLUSIONS: Double-bundle anatomical MPFL reconstruction with lateral retinaculum plasty is a promising procedure that provides a new option for patellar dislocation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

A lateral retinacular release during total knee arthroplasty changes femorotibial kinematics: an in vitro study.

INTRODUCTION: Lateral retinacular release (LRR) is a common procedure during total knee arthroplasty (TKA), especially if patellar maltracking is observed intraoperatively. The impact of LRR on patellofemoral kinematics is well-examined, but the influence on femorotibial kinematics requires more elucidation. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of LRR on femorotibial kinematics in vitro. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A fixed bearing TKA was implanted in six human knee specimens. Femorotibial kinematics were measured dynamically through the use of a custom-constructed knee rig which flexes the knee from 20° to 120° under weight bearing conditions. Measurements were performed before and after LRR. LRR was performed completely including transection of synovium, retinaculum and tractus fibers. For the registration of tibiofemoral kinematics a 3-dimensional-ultrasound-based motion analysis system was used. RESULTS: LRR revealed a significant reduction of femoral rollback at the lateral compartment (9.4 ± 5.0 vs 7.8 ± 9.4 mm; p < 0.01), whereas the present decrease of femoral rollback at the medial compartment was not significant (3.4 ± 4.7 vs 2.3 ± 5.9 mm; p = 0.34). Accordingly, LRR significantly reduced internal rotation of the tibia (0.8°; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that LRR significantly decreases lateral femoral rollback as well as internal rotation of the tibia, probably by changing the tension of the iliotibial band. When performing a LRR in clinical routine, surgeons should be aware of altering not only patellofemoral kinematics but also the femorotibial kinematics.

Lateral retinaculum plasty instead of lateral retinacular release with concomitant medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction can achieve better results for patellar dislocation.

PURPOSE: To elucidate the outcomes of lateral retinaculum plasty versus lateral retinacular release with concomitant medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction. METHODS: In a prospective study, 59 patients treated at our institution from 2012 to 2014 were included. The 59 patients were randomly divided into two groups. Group I included 27 patients who underwent lateral retinacular release and MPFL reconstruction. Group II included 32 patients who underwent lateral retinaculum plasty and MPFL reconstruction. All patients were followed up for at least 2 years and all assessments were performed both pre- and post-operation. Clinical evaluation consisted of the Kujala score, patellar medial glide test, and patellar tilt angle, patellar lateral shift, and congruence angle, measured on CT scan. RESULTS: Significant improvement was seen after surgery in both groups. The group of lateral retinaculum plasty achieved better results than the group of lateral retinacular release. No statistically significant differences were found in lateral patellar shift (ns) or congruence angle (ns) between the groups. There were significant differences in Kujala score (P < 0.05) patellar tilt angle (P < 0.05), and patellar medial glide test (P < 0.05) between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: MPFL reconstruction with lateral retinaculum plasty yielded better results than MPFL with lateral retinacular release. Postoperatively, medial and lateral function were restored, and patellar tracking was normal. Lateral retinaculum plasty is a new method that reduces the complications of lateral retinacular release for patellar dislocation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Arthroscopic treatment for patellar dislocation with lateral retinacular release combined with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction / 中国修复重建外科杂志

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of the arthroscopic lateral retinacular release combined with medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction for patellar dislocation.

The Effect of Concomitant Arthroscopic Lateral Retinacular Release on Postoperative Patellar Position and Orientation in Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of concomitant arthroscopic lateral release (LR) in open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) by comparing the pre- and postoperative radiological parameters of patellar position and orientation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was comprised of 19 knees undergoing OWHTO and concomitant LR and 18 knees undergoing OWHTO alone. Radiological parameters for patellar position and orientation included the Caton-Deschamps index (CDI), Blackburne-Peel index (BPI), patellar tilting angle (PTA), patellar lateral shift (PLS), and patellofemoral distance (PFD), which were evaluated in the preoperative period and at one year after surgery. RESULTS: Patellar height was significantly reduced after surgery as indicated by the decrease in BPI (p=0.03) in the OWHTO/LR group, and decrease in CDI (p=0.03) and BPI (p=0.04) in the OWHTO alone group. PTA and PLS were significantly reduced after the combined OWHTO/LR procedure (p=0.04 and p=0.04, respectively). By contrast, no significant changes were detected when isolated OWHTO was performed. CONCLUSIONS: OWHTO induced a postoperative decrease in patellar height in both groups. Regarding the change in patellofemoral alignment, concomitant LR in OWHTO significantly decreased lateral patellar tilt and shift, while no significant difference in those parameters were noted in the OWHTO alone knees.

Arthroscopic lateral retinacular release, medial retinacular plication and partial medial tibial tubercle transfer for recurrent patellar dislocation.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of a therapeutic protocol composed of arthroscopic lateral retinacular release, medial retinacular plication, and partial medial tibial tuberosity transfer for patients with recurrent patellar dislocation. METHOD: 71 patients, 11 males and 60 females and a total of 77 knees, with recurrent dislocation of the patella were enrolled between 1998 and 2012. The average age of the patients was 19.5 years and 67 of them had previous knee trauma history. Tibial tubercle avulsion fractures were all surgically treated without complications like dysplasia in the femoral trochlear groove or valgus deformity. The Q angle, sulcus angle, patella-femoral trochlear congruence angle and lateral patellofemoral angle were measured on X-ray, while tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance was measure on CT scans, before the arthroscopic operation. RESULT: 69 patients were followed-up for 2-16 years (average of 7.2 years), while 2 patients were lost during follow-up. Among the patients with follow-up, one patient had recurrent patella dislocation two months after the operation. Q angle decreased from 13.2° to 9.2° in male patients (P < 0.05) and from 21.0° to 15.4° in female patients (P < 0.05). On average, the patella-femoral trochlear congruence angle decreased from 24.2 ± 6.8° to -2.1 ± 5.8° (P < 0.05) and the lateral patellofemoral angle increased from -2.0 ± 5.2° to 10.9 ± 4.0° (P < 0.05). TT-TG distance decreased from 19.8 ± 2.1 mm to 13.6 ± 1.8 mm (P < 0.01). Mean Lysholm score increased from 45.6 ± 4.8 to 92.3 ± 10.8 (P < 0.05) and, IKDC score increased from 48.3 ± 6.8 to 94.3 ± 8.4 (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: As evidenced by minimal trauma and markedly improved knee joint function, the proposed therapeutic protocol demonstrated clear benefits for patients with recurrent patella dislocation.

[Influence of lateral retinacular release on anterior knee pain following total knee arthroplasty].

Objective: To investigate the effect of lateral retinacular release on the clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) without resurfacing of the patella. Methods: A prospective randomized controlled study was performed on 132 patients with unilateral degenerative knee arthritis undergoing TKA bewteen October 2012 and October 2014, who met the selection criteria. During TKA, lateral retinacular release was used in 66 cases (trial group) and was not used in 66 cases (control group). Two patients were excluded from the study due to missing the follow-up in trial group. Four patients were excluded from the study due to lateral retinacular release in control group. Finally, 64 patients and 62 patients were included in the trial group and in the control group. There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, side, disease duration, preoperative patellar morphology, grading of patellofemoral arthritis, grade of patellar cartilage degeneration, patellar malposition, patellar maltracking, patellar score, and Knee Society Score (KSS) between 2 groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, postoperative drainage volume, hospitalization time, postoperative complications, and patient satisfaction were recorded. Postoperative anterior knee pain was assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS), and the knee joint function was evaluated by KSS score and patellar score. The femoral angle, tibial angle, femoral flexion angle, and tibial posterior slope angle were measured on the X-ray film for postoperative prosthetic alignment. The postoperative patellar tracking and patellar position, as well as the presence of osteolysis, prosthesis loosening, patellar fracture and patellar necrosis were observed. Results: All patients were followed up for 24 months. There was no significant difference in operation time, postoperative drainage volume, hospitalization time, and patient satisfaction between 2 groups ( P>0.05). The incidence of anterior knee pain in the trial group was better than that in the control group ( P=0.033). KSS score and patellar score were significantly improved in both groups at 24 months after operation when compared with preoperative scores ( P<0.05), but no significant difference was found between 2 groups ( P>0.05). Complications included hematoma (2 cases in the trial group, and 1 case in the control group), mild wound dehiscence (2 cases in each group respectively), skin-edge necrosis (1 case in the trial group), and superficial wound infection (1 case in each group respectively), which were cured by conservative treatment. No patellar necrosis, patella fracture, or knee lateral pain occurred in 2 groups. There was no significant difference in complication rate between groups ( P=0.392). Satisfactory implant alignment was observed in both groups during follow-up. There was no significant difference in femoral angle, tibial angle, femoral flexion angle, and tibial posterior slope angle between 2 groups ( P>0.05). No radiolucent line at the bone-implant interface was seen around the tibial components and femoral components in both groups. The patellar maltracking was observed in 3 patients of the trial group and 5 patients of the control group, showing no significant difference ( P=0.488). However, the incidence of patellar malposition in the trial group (18.8%) was significantly lower than that in the control group (35.5%) ( χ2=0.173, P=0.034). Conclusion: Lateral retinacular release during primary TKA without resurfacing of the patella can reduce postoperative knee pain without increasing complications.

Double bundle medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with anterior half tendon of peroneus longus and lateral retinacular release in treatment of recurrent patellar dislocation:A report of 12 cases and literature review / 吉林大学学报(医学版)

Objective:To observe the process and curative effect of 12 cases of recurrent patellar dislocation treated by double bundle medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL)reconstruction with anterior half peroneus longus and lateral retinacular release,and to investigate the etiology and treatment method of recurrent patellar dislocation. Methods:A total of 12 patients with recurrent patellar dislocation were enrolled in this study,the MPFL was reconstructed with the anterior half peroneus longus,patellar fixation with suture anchors was completed with 2 parallel 5.0 mm anchors which were spaced 1.0 cm apart at the anatomic insertion site of the native MPFL,the femoral side was secured with a interference screw,and the lateral retinaculum was released at the same time.The Lysholm score,IKDC score,congruence angle,J sign,grind test,and apprehension test of the patients before and after operation were detected.Results:The mean follow-up period was 16.4 months,and the Lysholm score of the patients before operation was lower than the last follow-up (t = 9.03,P < 0.001);the IKDC score of the patients before operation was lower than the last follow-up (t = 9.75,P < 0.001);the congruence angle of the patients before operation was larger than after operation (t = 7.22,P <0.001).All of the patients demonstrated the positive results before operation in J sign,grind test,and apprehension test,and the negative results in J sign, grind test,and apprehension test after operation.No patient appeared pateela fracture and recurrence of patellar dislocation during the follow-up period.Conclusion:The curative effect of reconstruction of the MPFL with anterior half peroneus longus combined with lateral retinacular release is well in the treatment of recurrent patellar dislocation,which is suitable for clinical promotion.