Evaluation of the extended Japan NBI expert team classification of subtype 2B in laterally spreading colorectal tumors based on blue laser imaging.

OBJECTIVES: The Japan NBI Expert Team (JNET) classification has good diagnostic potential for colorectal diseases. We aimed to explore the diagnostic value of the JNET classification type 2B (JNET2B) criteria for colorectal laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) based on magnifying endoscopy with blue laser imaging (ME-BLI) examination. METHODS: Between January 2017 and June 2023, 218 patients who were diagnosed as having JNET2B-type LSTs using ME-BLI were included retrospectively. Endoscopic images were reinterpreted to categorize the LSTs as JNET2B-low (n = 178) and JNET2B-high (n = 53) LSTs. The JNET2B-low and JNET2B-high LSTs were compared based on their histopathological and morphological classifications. RESULTS: Among the 178 JNET2B-low LSTs, 86 (48.3%) were histopathologically classified as low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, 54 (30.3%) as high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN), 37 (20.8%) as intramucosal carcinoma (IMC), and one (0.6%) as superficial invasive submucosal carcinoma (SMC1). Among the 53 JNET2B-high LSTs, five (9.4%) were classified as HGIN, 28 (52.9%) as IMC, 15 (28.3%) as SMC1, and 5 (9.4%) as deep invasive submucosal carcinoma. There were significant differences in this histopathological classification between the two groups (P < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between JNET2B-low and JNET2B-high LSTs based on their morphological classification (granular vs nongranular) or size (<20 mm vs ≥20 mm). Besides, the κ value for JNET2B subtyping was 0.698 (95% confidence interval 0.592-0.804) between the two endoscopists who reassessed the endoscopic images. CONCLUSION: The JNET2B subtyping of LSTs has a diagnostic potential in the preoperative setting, and may be valuable for treatment decision-making.

Comparing underwater endoscopic submucosal dissection and conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for large laterally spreading tumor: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is challenging despite its usefulness. Underwater ESD (UESD) provides better traction and a clearer view of the submucosal layer than conventional ESD (CESD). This study compared the efficiency of UESD and CESD for large (20-50 mm) laterally spreading tumor (LST). METHODS: Preplanned sample size was calculated from our previous experience. As a results, 28 patients were required to UESD group or CESD group, respectively. The primary outcome was total procedure time while the secondary outcome was dissection speed. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were enrolled and a total of 28 patients were assigned to each group. The mean size of LST was 31.6 mm and 31.3 mm in the UESD and CESD group, respectively. Fibrosis was observed in 67.9% and 60.7% patients in the UESD and CESD group. Total procedure time (mean [SD]) for the UESD group was significantly shorter than that for the CESD group, respectively (49.5 minutes [20.3] vs 75.7 minutes [36.1]; mean difference, -26.2 minutes; 95% CI, -42.0 to -10.5). Dissection speed of the UESD group was significantly faster than that of the CESD group (21.9 mm2/min [6.9] vs 15.2 mm2/min [7.3]; mean difference, 6.7 mm2/minutes; 95% CI, 2.8-10.4). There was no difference between groups in the R0 resection rate or en bloc resection rate. No perforations were observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: UESD was superior to CESD in total procedure time and dissection speed. UESD can be recommended as the preferred method for the resection of large LST.

Resection of polyps involving the appendiceal orifice by combined endo-laparoscopic surgery: Two case reports.

BACKGROUND: The management of polyps involving the appendiceal orifice (AO) presents notable challenges. Endoscopic resection is frequently hindered by operational complexities, a heightened risk of incomplete removal, and an elevated risk of procedural complications, including appendicitis. Conversely, surgical resection may entail unnecessary excision of intestinal segments, leading to potential morbidity. CASE SUMMARY: Here, we reported two patients who presented with polyps deeply situated within the AO, with indistinct boundaries making it challenging to ensure completeness using traditional endoscopic resection. To overcome these challenges, we employed combined endo-laparoscopic surgery (CELS), achieving curative resection without postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: The application of CELS in managing polyps involving the AO is emerging as a safe and effective treatment modality.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for the treatment of rectal lesions involving the dentate line.

BACKGROUND: The ideal treatment of epithelial neoplastic rectal lesions involving the dentate line is a controversial issue. Piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is the most commonly used resection technique, but it is associated with high recurrence rates. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been shown to be safe and effective for the treatment of rectal lesions, but evidence is lacking concerning its application close to the dentate line. The aim of our study is to compare ESD and EMR for the treatment of epithelial rectal lesions involving the dentate line. METHODS: We identified all cases of endoscopic resections of rectal lesions involving the dentate line performed in two German high-volume centers between 2010 and 2022. Periinterventional and follow-up data were collected and retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: We identified 68 ESDs and 62 EMRs meeting our inclusion criteria. ESD showed a significant advantage in en bloc resection rates (89.7% vs. 9.7%; P = 0.001) and complete resection rates (72.1% vs. 9.7%; P = 0.001). The overall curative resection rate was similar between both groups (ESD: 92.6%, EMR: 83.9%; P = 0.324), whereas in the subgroup of low-risk adenocarcinomas ESD was curative in 100% of the cases vs. 14% in the EMR group (P = 0.002). There was one local recurrence after ESD (1,5%) vs. 16 (25.8%) after EMR (P < 0.0001), and the EMR patients required an average of three further interventions. CONCLUSION: ESD is superior to EMR for the treatment of epithelial rectal lesions involving the dentate line and should be considered the treatment of choice.

Safety and efficacy of ESD for laterally spreading tumors with hemorrhoids close to the dentate line.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a curative treatment for laterally spreading tumors (LSTs). However, the outcomes of ESD for LSTs with hemorrhoids remain largely unknown. Our study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of ESD in managing LSTs with hemorrhoids. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected 418 consecutive LST patients treated with ESD between 2011 and 2023. A retrospective comparative analysis was conducted. RESULTS: There were 85 patients included in the hemorrhoids group and 333 patients included in the other group. The en-bloc resection rate, R0 resection rate, and curative resection rate were comparable in these two groups (p > 0.05). The LSTs with hemorrhoids have a significantly higher intraoperative bleeding rate during ESD when compared to the other group (12.9% vs. 5.4%, p = 0.028). Rates of intraoperative perforation and anal pain in the hemorrhoid group were significantly higher than those in the no-hemorrhoid group (2.4% vs. 0%, p = 0.041; 9.4% vs.0.6%, p < 0.001; respectively). Moreover, most of the related manifestations caused by hemorrhoids were relieved to various degrees after ESD. CONCLUSIONS: ESD is a safe and effective treatment strategy for LSTs with hemorrhoids. A multi-center and prospective study should be conducted in the future to validate our results.

Application of miniprobe ultrasonic endoscope in evaluating the depth of invasion in colorectal laterally spreading tumors / 中国内镜杂志

Objective To analyze the accuracy and influencing factors of miniprobe ultrasonic endoscope in evaluating submucosal infiltration of colorectal laterally spreading tumor(LST).Method A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 213 patients(268 lesions in total)with colorectal LST who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD)treatment from June 2018 to August 2021.We summarized the clinical pathological characteristics and miniprobe ultrasonic endoscope examination results of LST,then analyzed the accuracy of miniprobe ultrasonic endoscope examination and the risk factors affecting the accuracy of miniprobe ultrasonic endoscope examination.Results The accuracy rate of miniprobe ultrasonic endoscope examination was 93.28%,and there was a statistically significant difference in the accuracy rate of miniprobe ultrasonic endoscope examination between different lesion surface morphologies(P = 0.000).Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that mix-ed nodule and false depression lesions were risk factors for inaccurate EUS assessment.Conclusion Colorectal LST is a special type of tumor,and miniprobe ultrasonic endoscope examination has a high accuracy in evaluating its infiltration depth.The surface morphology of the lesion is a risk factor that affects the accuracy of miniprobe ultrasonic endoscope examination.When the lesion is a nodule mixed type or pseudo depressed type,it can easily lead to inaccurate miniprobe ultrasonic endoscope examination.

The feasibility of endoscopic resection for colorectal laterally spreading tumors.

The present study aimed to investigate the feasibility and safety of endoscopic resection for colorectal laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) in different size groups. This retrospective study included 2699 patients with LSTs who underwent endoscopic treatment at the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from May 2012 to February 2022. The patient baseline and procedure outcomes were compared between the < 5 cm group, 5-10 cm group, and ≥ 10 cm group. Meanwhile, lesions larger than 5 cm in diameter were longitudinally compared for endoscopic safety using ESD with surgical operation outcomes. There were 2105 patients in the < 5 cm group, 547 patients in the 5-10 cm group, and 47 patients in the ≥ 10 cm group. En bloc resection and R0 resection rates, the incidence of adverse events, length of stay (LOS), and medical costs significantly differed between the groups (P < 0.01). Comorbidity of diabetes or hypertension, history of antithrombotic drug use, lesion size, location, gross type, endoscopic procedures selection, and circumferential extent of the mucosal defect were independent risk factors for delayed bleeding (P < 0.05). En bloc resection, R0 resection, and lesion canceration were associated with local recurrence. For lesions larger than 5 cm in diameter, ESD had similar R0 resection and local recurrence rates compared with a surgical operation but a lower en bloc rate, LOS, and medical costs. Expert endoscopists can significantly increase en bloc and R0 resection rates and reduce the incidence of adverse events. Endoscopic resection results distinguish in different size groups of colorectal LSTs, yet its safety and feasibility are not inferior to a surgical operation.

Large colonic lipoma with a laterally spreading tumor treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Since fat does not transmit electrical energy well, delayed perforation and post-polypectomy syndrome due to electrical thermal injury are concerns in the endoscopic removal of colonic lipoma. The endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) technique concentrates electrical energy conducts to the submucosa, not the adipose tissue. This helps to minimize electrical thermal injury, especially in the case of large colonic lipomas. In rare cases, such as colonic lipomas accompanied by mucosal lesions, it is difficult for endoscopists to decide how to safely remove them. CASE SUMMARY: A 78-year-old man underwent colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening. During colonoscopy, a yellowish submucosal tumor with positive cushion sign was observed in the ascending colon measuring about 4.5 cm. A nodular mucosal lesion of about 2.5 cm was observed on the mucosal surface of the lipoma. The lipoma was so large that it occupied much of the inside of the colon, making it difficult to see the entire laterally spreading tumor (LST) at once. The LST was confined to the surface of the lipoma, which had a semipedunculated shape with a wide neck. The margin of the LST was not observed at the neck of the lipoma. ESD was performed and the colonic lipoma with the LST was successfully removed without complications. After 3 d of hospitalization, the patient was discharged without any symptoms. The final pathology report showed that the lesion consisted of submucosal lipoma and tubulovillous adenoma with low-grade dysplasia. CONCLUSION: ESD is effective and safe for treating a large colonic lipoma with an LST by minimizing electrical thermal injury.

Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for giant rectal tumors larger than 8 cm: A European referral center experience.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To date, western data on colorectal ESD are limited. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of rectal ESD for superficial lesions ≥ 8 cm. METHODS: A total of 138 superficial rectal neoplasms treated by ESD were allocated in two groups: 25 in the "giant" ESD group and 113 in the control group. RESULTS: En bloc resection was achieved in 96% of cases in both groups. En bloc R0 resection rate was similar between the "giant" ESD group and the control group (84% vs 86%; p: 0.5) and curative resection was higher in the control group (81%) than in "giant" ESD group (68%) without reaching statistical significance (p: 0.2). Dissection time was significantly longer in the "giant" ESD group (251 vs 108 min; p <0.001), however, dissection speed was significantly higher (0.35 vs 0.17 cm2/min; p: 0.02).). Post-ESD stenosis was observed in 2 patients from the "giant" ESD group (8% vs 0% of control group, p: 0.03). No significant differences were found in delayed bleeding, perforation, local recurrences, and need for additional surgery. CONCLUSIONS: ESD for superficial rectal tumors ≥ 8 cm is a feasible, safe, and effective therapeutic option.

Methylation of CpG island promoters at ZNF625, LONRF2, SDC2 and WDR17 in a patient with numerous non-granular type laterally spreading tumors and colorectal cancer: A case report.

Patients with adenomatous polyposis syndromes such as familial adenomatous polyposis are at higher risk of colorectal cancer, hence continuous management is necessary. However, little is known about the etiology of patients with numerous laterally spreading tumors (LSTs), or how genetic alterations uniquely influence LSTs in colorectal carcinogenesis. The present case report investigated a woman with >150 non-granular type LSTs (LST-NG) and one sigmoid colon cancer. After subtotal colectomy via ileorectal anastomosis, genetic and epigenetic analyses were conducted by comparing the profiles of the patient's normal colonic mucosa, four LST-NG lesions and a cancer lesion. Using customized multigene panel testing, no pathogenic germline mutations were detected, including APC regulator of WNT signaling pathway, but identified a somatic pathogenic variant of APC in one LST-NG lesion, and both TP53 and F-box and WD repeat domain containing 7 somatic mutations in the cancer. Comprehensive genome-wide methylation analysis showed that CpG island promoters at zinc finger protein 625, LON peptidase N-terminal domain and ring finger 2, WD repeat domain 17 and syndecan 2 were methylated in both LST-NG and cancer, which may contribute to colorectal tumorigenesis as early as the LST-NG phase.

Integrated Analysis Identifies Novel Fusion Transcripts in Laterally Spreading Tumors Suggestive of Distinct Etiology Than Colorectal Cancers.

BACKGROUND: Laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) of the colon and rectum are a class of abnormality which spreads laterally and appears ulcerated. They are a subclass of colorectal cancer (CRCs) with higher invasive potential than CRCs. Moreover, the etiology of LST still remains obscure. METHODS: This study aimed to identify unique fusion transcript(s) in LSTs and evaluate their role in LST development and progression. RNA-Seq data for LST samples from the EMBL-EBI database were used to identify fusion transcripts. An integrated approach using Gene Ontology, pathway analysis, hub gene, and co-expression network analysis functionally characterized fusion transcripts to shed light upon the etiology of LSTs. RESULT: We identified 48 unique fusion genes in LSTs. GO terms were enriched in mRNA metabolic (p ≤ 2.06E-06), mRNA stabilization (p ≤ 1.60E-05), in cytosol (1.20E-05), RBP (p ≤ 2.30E-04), and RNA binding activity (p ≤ 3.51E-08) processes. Pathway analysis revealed an inflammatory phenotype of LSTs suggesting a distinct etiology than CRCs as pathways were enriched in salmonella infection (p ≤ 4.41 e-03), proteoglycans in cancer (p ≤ 1.18 e-02), and insulin signaling (p ≤ 2.13 e-02). Our exclusion and inclusion criteria and hub gene analysis finally identified 9 hub genes. Co-expression analysis of hub genes identified the most significant transcription factors (NELFE, MYC, TAF1, MAX) and kinases (MAPK14, CSNK2A1, CDK1, MAPK1) which were implicated in various cancer pathways. Furthermore, an overall survival analysis of hub genes was performed. Our predefined criterion resulted in the enrichment of NPM1-PTMA (NPM1: p ≤ 0.005) and HIST1H2BO-YBX1 (YBX1: p ≤ 0.02) fusion transcripts, significantly associated with the patient's overall survival. CONCLUSION: Our systematic analysis resulted in novel fusion genes in LSTs suggesting a different etiology than CRCs. Fusion transcripts were observed more frequently in non-granular LSTs suggestive of genetically more unstable than granular LST. We hypothesize that NPM1-PTMA and HIST1H2BO-YBX1 could be implicated in LST development and progression and may also serve as a prognostic or diagnostic biomarker in future for better management of LSTs.

[Efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection assisted by metal-clip pocket creation traction for colorectal tumors].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) assisted by metal-clip pocketcreation traction for treatment of colorectal tumors. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 244 patients with colorectal tumors undergoing colorectal ESD treatment between January, 2019 and December, 2022, including 169 patients receiving ESD without metal-clip pocket-creation traction (N-ESD group) and 75 with traction-assisted ESD (M-ESD group). Propensity score matching was used to screen the patients using general clinical data as the covariates for matching. Operative time, surgical resection outcome indicators, incidence of adverse events, and histopathological diagnosis indicators were compared between the two groups of patients after matching. RESULTS: The median operative time was significantly shorter in M-ESD group than in N-ESD group (20.0 [15.0, 30.0] vs 30 [20.0, 45.0] min, P=0.008). No significant difference was found in the en bloc resection rate (100% vs 98.6%), complete resection rate (97.3% vs 96%) and radical resection rate (97.3% vs 96%) between the two groups (P>0.05). The incidence of adverse events was low in both groups and showed no significant difference between them (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: In patients with colorectal tumors, the use of metal-clip pocket-creation traction can shorten the operative time of ESD although it does not significantly reduce the surgical resection rate or incidence of adverse events.

Predictors of colorectal polyps complicating colorectal laterally spreading tumors and the risk factors for malignancy in coexistence / 中华消化内镜杂志

Objective:To investigate the independent predictors of colorectal polyps complicating colorectal laterally spreading tumors (CLST) and the independent risk factors for malignancy in CLST coexisting with colorectal polyps.Methods:Clinical data of 260 patients with CLST who underwent endoscopy and received treatment in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University from January 2016 to December 2021 were retrospectively collected. Patients were divided into the coexisting group ( n=135) and the non-coexisting group ( n=125) according to the presence or absence of polyps. Differences in clinicopathological characteristics between the two groups were compared and binary logistic regression was used to analyse the predictors of coexistence. Then the coexisting group was further divided into coexisting malignant group ( n=38) and coexisting non-malignant group ( n=97) according to the infiltration depth of CLST, and binary logistic regression was used to analyse the risk factors for malignancy in CLST coexisting with colorectal polyps. Results:Male ( P=0.002, OR=2.355, 95% CI:1.354-4.099), villous tubular adenoma ( P=0.022, OR=3.873, 95% CI: 1.214-12.355) and polyps history ( P=0.001, OR=2.738, 95% CI: 1.527-4.909) were independent predictors for colorectal polyps coexisting with CLST. Area under the curve (AUC) of the predictive model was 0.725 ( P<0.001, 95% CI: 0.664-0.786). Polyp diameter≥10 mm ( P=0.007, OR=6.266, 95% CI:1.634-24.034), CLST diameter≥20 mm ( P<0.001, OR=11.879, 95% CI:4.078-34.601), granular-mixed type CLST ( P=0.003, OR=8.584, 95% CI: 2.126-34.660), flat-elevated type CLST ( P=0.021, OR=4.399, 95% CI: 1.250-15.482) and pseudo-depressed type CLST ( P<0.001, OR=31.426, 95% CI: 4.975-198.509) were independent risk factors for malignancy in CLST coexisting with polyps. AUC of the predictive model was 0.854 ( P<0.001, 95% CI: 0.775-0.933). Conclusion:Male CLST patients with polyps history and a pathological type of villous tubular adenoma are more likely to develop coexistence. In patients with CLST which is granular-mixed type, flat-elevated type and pseudo-depressed type coexisting with colorectal polyps, the larger the diameter of the polyp and the diameter of the CLST, the more likely it is to be malignant.

Role of atrial natriuretic peptide receptor in inhibition of laterally spreading tumors via Wnt/ß-catenin signaling.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most prevalent malignancy worldwide. Laterally spreading tumors (LSTs), as special manifestations of digestive tract tumors, are often misdiagnosed or undiagnosed due to their unique morphological and pathological features. LST has no protruding lesions and progresses rapidly, and prognoses are consequently poor. LST progression to CRC is complicated. Clinical data indicate that the heart is rarely the site of primary tumorigenesis, and a class of atrial natriuretic peptides (ANPs) secreted by heart tissue play an important role in this phenomenon, which is closely related to the Wnt/ß-catenin signaling pathway. However, previous studies focused solely on correlations between the Wnt/ß-catenin signaling pathway, downstream gene expression and LST. Thus, correlational studies of ANP/ANP receptor, LST and CRC may be of great help in understanding the occurrence, development and treatment of LST, as well as in establishing specific and sensitive methods for detecting LST.

Wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection of laterally spreading rectal tumors using a multiband ligation endoscopic mucosal resection technique.

Video 1Tools and techniques video introducing and demonstrating the multiband ligation-assisted EMR technique to achieve wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection of large rectal laterally spreading tumors.

A diagnostic test: diagnostic value of gastrointestinal endoscopy narrow-band imaging (NBI) for colorectal laterally spreading tumor (LST) and submucosal invasion.

Background: Endoscopic ultrasonography is an effective endoscopic examination method for determining the depth of colorectal cancer invasion. Narrow-band imaging (NBI) techniques increase the contrast of vascular structures and more clearly highlight subtle structures on mucosal surfaces, thereby improving the accuracy of endoscopic assessment. This study investigated the diagnostic efficacy of NBI in colorectal laterally spreading tumor (LST) and its submucosal invasion. Methods: A total of 224 patients with colorectal LST admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Putian University from January 2015 to December 2021 were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into NBI and endoscopic ultrasonography groups according to the different examination methods they received. Subsequently, the clinicopathological characteristics of the patients were collected, and the rates of submucosal invasion of the four subtypes (LST-G-H, LST-G-NM, LST-NG-F, LST-NG-PD) were compared between the two groups. Also, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of judging the depth of LST lesions of the two examination methods were compared, taking the results of pathological tissue examination as the gold standard. Results: This study enrolled 224 patients with LST (mean onset age: 57.98±6.48 years), including 123 males and 101 females. In terms of tumor location, 21 cases were located in the cecum, 22 cases in the ascending colon, 38 cases in the transverse colon, 11 cases in the descending colon, 12 cases in the descending sigmoid junction, 23 cases in the sigmoid colon, and 97 cases in the rectum. The sizes of the tumors ranged from 18.81 to 52.88 mm. Moreover, there were 21 cases of lesion infiltration into the submucosa, and the infiltration rate was 9.38%. Furthermore, the accuracy of NBI in diagnosing colorectal LST was significantly higher than that of endoscopic ultrasonography (87.05% vs. 57.14%); NBI was more accurate than endoscopic ultrasonography in the preoperative diagnosis of LST lesion depth in the rectal, non-rectal, granular (LST-G), non-granular (LST-NG), <40, and ≥40 mm groups. Conclusions: Gastrointestinal NBI has a superior accuracy rate and value than endoscopic ultrasonography in diagnosing colorectal LST, tumor lesion depth, and submucosal invasion. Therefore, gastrointestinal NBI deserves to be promoted in clinical work.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of endoscopic resection for colorectal laterally spreading tumors: Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection.

OBJECTIVES: The cost-effectiveness of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection (pEMR) for colorectal laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) remains unclear. We examined the cost-effectiveness of these procedures for cases of colon/rectal LST-non-granular-type ≥2 cm and LST-granular-mixed-type ≥3 cm. METHODS: We performed a simulation model analysis using parameters based on clinical data from the National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, and previous literature. The number of recurrences and surgeries and the required costs for 5 years following ESD and pEMR were assessed. Japanese cost data were used in the base-case analysis, and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) was performed. The Swedish cost data were used in the scenario analysis. RESULTS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection yielded a considerably lower number of recurrences and surgeries but required a higher cost than pEMR. The recurrence rates following ESD and pEMR were 0.9-1.3% and 21.1-25.9%, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for an avoided recurrence and surgery for ESD against pEMR were 376,796-476,496 JPY (3575-4521 USD) and 7,335,436-8,187,476 JPY (69,604-77,689 USD), respectively. PSA demonstrated that the probability of ESD being chosen as a more cost-effective option than pEMR was >50% at willingness-to-pay values of ≥400,000-500,000 JPY (3795-4744 USD) for avoiding a recurrence and ≥9,500,000-10,500,000 JPY (90,143-99,631 USD) for avoiding a surgery. In the scenario analysis, the required cost was also lower for ESD. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest potentially favorable cost-effectiveness of ESD, depending on cost settings and the willingness-to-pay value for avoiding recurrence/surgery.

Analysis of clinical and pathological characteristics of 266 cases of colorectal laterally spreading tumor / 中华消化杂志

Objective:To analyze the clinical and pathological characteristics of colorectal laterally spreading tumor (CLST) and provide reference for clinical diagnosis and treatment of CLST.Methods:From January 1, 2016 to June 30, 2021, the clinical data of patients with CLST who underwent endoscopic resection at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University were retrospectively collected. The clinical and pathological characteristics of CLST were analyzed in terms of lesion location (right colon, left colon, rectum) and morphological type (granular-homogeneous type, granular-mixed type, flat-elevated type, and pseudo-depressed type). One-way analysis of variance, Pearson′s chi-square test and Fisher′s exact test were used for statistical analysis.Results:A total of 266 patients with CLST and 296 CLST lesions were included. The most common maximum diameters of the lesions were 10 to 29 mm, accounting for 85.1% (252/296). The main morphological type was granular type, accounting for 81.4% (241/296), and the main pathological type was adenoma, accounting for 79.7% (236/296), and the most common histological type was low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN), accounting for 81.1% (240/296). The maximum diameter of CLST lesion of rectum was larger than that of the right colon and the left colon ((24.20±16.97), (18.38±8.24) and (18.59±7.95) mm, respectively), and the difference was statistically significant ( F=6.62, P<0.001). The detection rate of granular-homogeneous type CLST in rectum was lower than that in the right colon and the left colon (22.0%, 11/50, 53.5%, 69/129 and 58.9%, 69/117, respectively), while the detection rate of granular-mixed type CLST in rectum was higher than that in the right colon and the left colon (50.0%, 25/50; 29.4%, 38/129 and 24.8%, 29/117, respectively), and the differences were statistically significant ( χ2=20.06 and 10.67, both P<0.01). The incidence of adenoma in CLST in the right colon was lower than that in the left colon and rectum (68.2%, 88/129; 87.2%, 102/117 and 92.0%, 46/50, respectively), while the incidence of serrated adenoma in CLST in the right colon was higher than that in the left colon and rectum (30.2%, 39/129; 12.8%, 15/117 and 4.0%, 2/50, respectively), and the differences were statistically significant ( χ2=19.25 and 20.85, both P<0.001). The CLST in left colon was mostly treated by endoscopic submucosa dissection (94.9%, 111/117), while the CLST in rectum was mostly treated by endoscopic mucosal resection (20.0%, 10/50), and the difference was statistically significant ( χ2=8.77, P=0.012). The maximum diameter of the pseudo-depressed type CLST was larger than that of the granular-homogeneous type, granular-mixed type and flat-elevated type ((24.18±14.07), (15.96±5.70), (23.49±13.80) and (21.21±8.02) mm), and the difference was statistically significant ( F=13.40, P<0.001). The incidence of adenoma in flat-elevated type CLST was higher than that of the granular-homogeneous type, granular-mixed type and pseudo-depressed type (92.1%, 35/38; 71.1%, 106/149; 86.9%, 80/92 and 15/17, respectively), and the difference was statistically significant ( χ2=14.13, P=0.003). The incidence of serrated adenoma in the granular-homogeneous type CLST was higher than that of the granular-mixed type, flat-elevated type and pseudo-depressed type (28.9%, 43/149; 10.9%, 10/92; 5.3%, 2/38 and 1/17, respectively), and the difference was statistically significant ( χ2=19.98, P<0.001). The incidence of adenocarcinoma in the pseudo-depressed type CLST was higher than that of the granular-homogeneous type, granular-mixed type and flat-elevated type (1/17; 0, 0/149; 2.2%, 2/92 and 2.6%, 1/38, respectively), and the difference was statistically significant (Fisher′s exact test, P=0.049). The incidence of LGIN in the granular-homogeneous type CLST was higher than that of the granular-mixed type, flat-elevated type and pseudo-depressed type (90.6%, 135/149; 76.1%, 70/92; 65.8%, 25/38 and 10/17, respectively), while the incidences of high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and carcinoma in the pseudo-depressed type CLST were higher than those of the granular-homogeneous type, granular-mixed type and flat-elevated type (6/17; 9.4%, 14/149; 21.7%, 20/92; 31.6%, 12/38 and 1/17; 0, 0/149; 2.2%, 2/92 and 2.6%, 1/38), and the differences were statistically significant( χ2=21.58 and 16.81 and Fisher′s exact test, all P<0.05). Conclusions:The clinicopathological characteristics of CLST have certain specificity. The maximum diameter and malignant potential of the rectal CLST are both larger and higher than those of the colonic CLST. Although the granular-mixed type CLST is the granular type, it shows a larger maximum diameter and a higher degree of malignancy.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection of a large cecal tumor extending into the appendiceal orifice in a patient with intact appendix.

Video 1Endoscopic submucosal dissection of a cecal laterally spreading tumor-granular type extending into the appendiceal orifice.