Effects of left bundle branch block on echocardiographic coronary flow assessment: A systematic review.

This systematic review investigates the diagnostic and prognostic utility of coronary flow reserve (CFR) assessment through echocardiography in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB), a condition known to complicate the clinical evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD). The literature search was performed on PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar, was guided by PRISMA standards up to March 2024, and yielded six observational studies that met inclusion criteria. These studies involved a diverse population of patients with LBBB, employing echocardiographic protocols to clarify the impact of LBBB on coronary flow dynamics. The findings emphasize the importance of CFR in stratifying cardiovascular risk and guiding clinical decision-making in patients with LBBB. Pooled results reveal that patients with LBBB and significant left anterior descending (LAD) artery stenosis exhibited a marked decrease in stress-peak diastolic velocity (MD = -19.03 [-23.58; -14.48] cm/s; p < .0001) and CFR (MD = -.60 [-.71; -.50]; p < .0001), compared to those without significant LAD lesions, suggesting the efficacy of stress echocardiography CFR assessment in the identification of clinically significant CAD among the LBBB population. This review highlights the clinical relevance of echocardiography CFR assessment as a noninvasive tool for evaluating CAD and stratifying risk in the presence of LBBB and underscores the need for standardized protocols in CFR measurement.

The association between paced left ventricular activation time and cardiac reverse remodeling in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block.

INTRODUCTION: The association between paced LVAT and cardiac structure and function at baseline, as well as whether longer LVAT is associated with worse cardiac reverse remodeling in patients with heart failure (HF) and left bundle branch block (LBBB) has not been well investigated. The purpose of this study is to investigate the association between paced LVAT and baseline echocardiographic parameters and cardiac reverse remodeling at follow-up. METHODS: Patients with HF and LBBB receiving successful left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) from June 2018 to April 2023 were enrolled and grouped based on paced LVAT. NT-proBNP and echocardiographic parameters were recorded during routine follow-up. The relationships between paced LVAT and echocardiographic parameters at baseline and follow-up were analyzed. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients were enrolled (48 males, aged 65 ± 9.8, mean LVEF 32.1 ± 7.5%, mean LVEDD 63.0 ± 8.5 mm, median NT-proBNP 1057[513-3158] pg/mL). The paced QRSd was significantly decreased (177 ± 17.9 vs. 134 ± 18.5, p < .001) and median paced LVAT was 80[72-88] ms. After a median follow-up of 12[9-29] months, LVEF increased to 52.1 ± 11.2%, LVEDD decreased to 52.6 ± 8.8 mm, and NT-proBNP decreased to 215[73-532]pg/mL. Patients were grouped based on paced LVAT: LVAT < 80 ms (n = 39); 80 ≤ LVAT < 90 ms (n = 24); LVAT ≥ 90 ms (n = 20). Patients with longer LVAT had larger LVEDD and lower LVEF (LVEDDbaseline: p < .001; LVEFbaseline: p = .001). The difference in LVEF6M was statistically significant among groups (p < .001) and patients with longer LVAT had lower LVEF6M, while the difference in LVEF1Y was not seen (p = .090). There was no significant correlation between ΔLVEF6M-baseline, ΔLVEF1Y-6M and LVAT respectively (ΔLVEF6M-baseline: p = .261, r = -.126; ΔLVEF1Y-6M: p = .085, r = .218). CONCLUSION: Long paced LVAT was associated with worse echocardiographic parameters at baseline, but did not affect the cardiac reverse remodeling in patients with HF and LBBB. Those with longer LVAT required longer time to recover.

Retrograde Conduction in Left Bundle Branch Block: Insights From Left Bundle Branch Pacing.

BACKGROUND: Biventricular pacing is a well-established therapy for patients with heart failure (HF), left bundle branch block (LBBB) and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) has emerged as an alternative to biventricular pacing. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the retrograde conduction properties of the left bundle branch in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy and LBBB during LBBP and its clinical implications. METHODS: Patients undergoing successful LBBP for nonischemic cardiomyopathy with LV ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35% and LBBB were included. Continuous recording of His potential was performed using a quadripolar catheter. Unidirectional block was defined as retrograde His bundle activation during LBBP with stimulus to His potential (SH) duration less than or equal to antegrade HV interval and bidirectional block as VH dissociation or SH duration greater than HV interval. HF hospitalization, ventricular arrhythmias, and mortality were documented. RESULTS: A total of 165 patients were included. The mean follow-up duration was 21.8 ± 13.1 months. Bidirectional block (group I) was observed in 82% (n = 136), and these patients were noted to have advanced HF stage and prolonged baseline QRS duration. Unidirectional block (group II) with intact retrograde conduction was observed in 18% (n = 29) and was associated with narrow paced QRS duration and higher LVEF during follow-up. Super-response (LVEF ≥50%) was observed in 54.4% (n = 74) in group I compared with 73.3% (n = 22) in group II (P = 0.03). The OR for LVEF normalization was 4.1 (95% CI: 1.26-13.97; P = 0.02), with unidirectional block compared with bidirectional block in patients with LBBB and LV dysfunction. Adverse clinical outcomes as measured by a composite of HF hospitalization, ventricular arrhythmias, and mortality were significantly higher in group I compared with group II (12.5% vs 0%; P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Bidirectional block in LBBB was characterized by advanced HF symptoms, while unidirectional block was associated with better clinical outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy by LBBP.

The Role of TOMM40 in Cardiovascular Mortality and Conduction Disorders: An Observational Study.

Aims: TOMM40 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs2075650 consists of allelic variation c.275-31A > G and it has been linked to Alzheimer disease, apolipoprotein and cholesterol levels and other risk factors. However, data on its role in cardiovascular disorders are lacking. The first aim of the study is to evaluate mortality according to TOMM40 genotype in a cohort of selected patients affected by advanced atherosclerosis. Second aim was to investigate the relationship between Xg and AA alleles and the presence of conduction disorders and implantation of defibrillator (ICD) or pacemaker (PM) in our cohort. Materials and Methods: We enrolled 276 patients (mean age 70.16 ± 7.96 years) affected by hemodynamic significant carotid stenosis and/or ischemia of the lower limbs of II or III stadium Fontaine. We divided the population into two groups according to the genotype (Xg and AA carriers). We evaluated several electrocardiographic and echocardiographic parameters, including heart rate, rhythm, presence of right and left bundle branch block (LBBB and RBBB), PR interval, QRS duration and morphology, QTc interval, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We clinically followed these patients for 82.53 ± 30.02 months and we evaluated the incidence of cardiovascular events, number of deaths and PM/ICD implantations. Results: We did not find a difference in total mortality between Xg and AA carriers (16.3 % vs. 19.4%; p = 0.62). However, we found a higher mortality for fatal cardiovascular events in Xg carriers (8.2% vs. 4.4%; HR = 4.53, 95% CI 1.179-17.367; p = 0.04) with respect to AA carriers. We noted a higher percentage of LBBB in Xg carriers (10.2% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.027), which was statistically significant. Presence of right bundle branch block (RBBB) was also higher in Xg (10.2% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.10), but without reaching statistically significant difference compared to AA patients. We did not observe significant differences in heart rate, presence of sinus rhythm, number of device implantations, PR and QTc intervals, QRS duration and LVEF between the two groups. At the time of enrolment, we observed a tendency for device implant in Xg carriers at a younger age compared to AA carriers (58.50 ± 0.71 y vs. 72.14 ± 11.11 y, p = 0.10). During the follow-up, we noted no statistical difference for new device implantations in Xg respect to AA carriers (8.2% vs. 3.5%; HR = 2.384, 95% CI 0.718-7.922; p = 0.156). The tendency to implant Xg at a younger age compared to AA patients was confirmed during follow-up, but without reaching a significant difference(69.50 ± 2.89 y vs. 75.63 ± 8.35 y, p = 0.074). Finally, we pointed out that Xg carriers underwent device implantation 7.27 ± 4.43 years before AA (65.83 ± 6.11 years vs. 73.10 ± 10.39 years) and that difference reached a statistically significant difference (p = 0.049) when we considered all patients, from enrollment to follow-up. Conclusions: In our study we observed that TOMM40 Xg patients affected by advanced atherosclerosis have a higher incidence of developing fatal cardiovascular events, higher incidence of LBBB and an earlier age of PM or ICD implantations, as compared to AA carriers. Further studies will be needed to evaluate the genomic contribution of TOMM40 SNPs to cardiovascular deaths and cardiac conduction diseases.

Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing to Overcome Coronary Sinus Anatomy-Related Technical Problems Encountered during Implantation of Biventricular CRT-A Case Report.

The results of clinical trials show that up to one-third of patients who are eligible for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) do not benefit from biventricular pacing. The reasons vary, including technical problems related to left ventricle pacing lead placement in the appropriate branch of the coronary sinus. Herein, we present a case report of a patient with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and left bundle branch block, in whom a poor coronary sinus bed made implantation of classic biventricular CRT impossible, but in whom, alternatively, rescue-performed left bundle branch area pacing allowed effective electrical and mechanical cardiac resynchronization. The report confirms that left bundle branch area pacing may be a rational alternative in such cases.

CMR characterization of patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block.

Aims: We aimed to identify the distinctive cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) features of patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) of presumed non-ischaemic aetiology. The secondary aim was to determine whether these individuals exhibit characteristics that could potentially serve as predictors of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) recovery as compared with patients without LBBB. Methods and results: We prospectively recruited patients with HFrEF (LVEF ≤ 40%) on echocardiography who were referred for early CMR examination. Patients with an established diagnosis of coronary artery disease and known structural or congenital heart disease were excluded. LV recovery was defined as achieving ≥10% absolute improvement to ≥40% in LVEF between baseline evaluation to CMR. A total of 391 patients were recruited including 115 (29.4%) with LBBB. Compared with HF patients without LBBB, those with LBBB exhibited larger left ventricles and smaller right ventricles, but no differences were observed with respect to LVEF (35.8 ± 12 vs. 38 ± 12%, P = 0.105). The overall rate of LV recovery from baseline echocardiogram to CMR (70 [42-128] days) was not significantly different between LBBB and non-LBBB patients (27.8% vs. 31.5%, P = 0.47). Reduced LVEF remained an independent predictor of LV non-recovery only in patients with LBBB. Conclusion: Patients presenting with HFrEF and LBBB had larger LV cavities and smaller RV cavities than those without LBBB but no difference in prevalence of scar or ischaemia. The rates of LV recovery were similar between both groups, which supports current guidelines to defer device therapy until 3-6 months of guideline-directed medical therapy, rather than early CMR and device implantation.

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy for Patients With Mild to Moderately Reduced Ejection Fraction and Left Bundle Branch Block.

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) would improve or halt the progression of heart failure (HF) in patients with mild to moderately reduced ejection fraction (HFmmrEF) and left bundle branch block (LBBB). OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of CRT in patients with HFmmrEF and left ventricular conduction delay. METHODS: A prospective, randomized clinical trial sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute included 76 patients who met the study inclusion criteria (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] of 36%-50% and LBBB). Patients received CRT-pacemaker and were randomized to CRT-OFF (right ventricular pacing 40 beats/min) or CRT-ON (biventricular pacing 60-150 beats/min). At a 6-month follow-up, pacing programming was changed to the opposite settings. New York Heart Association class, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels, and echocardiographic variables were collected at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. The primary study end point was the left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) change from baseline, and the primary randomized comparison was the comparison of 6-month to 12-month changes between randomized groups. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 68.4 ± 9.8 years (male, 71%). Baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 randomized groups (all P > .05). In patients randomized to CRT-OFF first, then CRT-ON, LVESV was reduced from baseline only after CRT-ON (baseline, 116.1 ± 36.5 mL; CRT-ON, 87.6 ± 26.0 mL; P < .0001). The randomized analysis of LVEF showed a significantly better change from 6 to 12 months in the OFF-ON group (P = .003). LVEF was improved by CRT (baseline, 41.3% ±.7%; CRT-ON, 46.0% ± 8.0%; P = .002). In patients randomized to CRT-ON first, then CRT-OFF, LVESV was reduced after both CRT-ON and CRT-OFF (baseline, 109.8 ± 23.5 mL; CRT-ON, 91.7 ± 30.5 mL [P < .0001]; CRT-OFF, 99.3 ± 28.9 mL [P = .012]). However, the LVESV reduction effect became smaller between CRT-ON and CRT-OFF (P = .027). LVEF improved after both CRT-ON and CRT-OFF (baseline, 42.7% ± 4.3%; CRT-ON, 48.5% ± 8.6% [P < .001]; CRT-OFF, 45.9% ± 7.7% [P = .025]). CONCLUSION: CRT for patients with HFmmrEF significantly improves LVEF and ventricular remodeling after 6 months of CRT. The study provides novel evidence that early CRT benefits patients with HFmmrEF with LBBB.

Left bundle branch pacing set to outshine biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy?

The deleterious effects of long-term right ventricular pacing necessitated the search for alternative pacing sites which could prevent or alleviate pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. Until recently, biventricular pacing (BiVP) was the only modality which could mitigate or prevent pacing induced dysfunction. Further, BiVP could resynchronize the baseline electromechanical dssynchrony in heart failure and improve outcomes. However, the high non-response rate of around 20%-30% remains a major limitation. This non-response has been largely attributable to the direct non-physiological stimulation of the left ventricular myocardium bypassing the conduction system. To overcome this limitation, the concept of conduction system pacing (CSP) came up. Despite initial success of the first CSP via His bundle pacing (HBP), certain drawbacks including lead instability and dislodgements, steep learning curve and rapid battery depletion on many occasions prevented its widespread use for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Subsequently, CSP via left bundle branch-area pacing (LBBP) was developed in 2018, which over the last few years has shown efficacy comparable to BiVP-CRT in small observational studies. Further, its safety has also been well established and is largely free of the pitfalls of the HBP-CRT. In the recent metanalysis by Yasmin et al, comprising of 6 studies with 389 participants, LBBP-CRT was superior to BiVP-CRT in terms of QRS duration, left ventricular ejection fraction, cardiac chamber dimensions, lead thresholds, and functional status amongst heart failure patients with left bundle branch block. However, there are important limitations of the study including the small overall numbers, inclusion of only a single small randomized controlled trial (RCT) and a small follow-up duration. Further, the entire study population analyzed was from China which makes generalizability a concern. Despite the concerns, the meta-analysis adds to the growing body of evidence demonstrating the efficacy of LBBP-CRT. At this stage, one must acknowledge that the fact that still our opinions on this technique are largely based on observational data and there is a dire need for larger RCTs to ascertain the position of LBBP-CRT in management of heart failure patients with left bundle branch block.

Pacemaker post transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A multifactorial risk?

Pacemaker post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement is related to multifactorial risk. Nwaedozie et al brought to the body of evidence electrocardiogram and clinical findings. However, procedural characteristics have at least as much impact on the final need for a permanent pacemaker and potentially on the pacing rate. In this regard, long-term follow-up and understanding of the impact of long-term stimulation is of utmost importance.

Parameter subset reduction for imaging-based digital twin generation of patients with left ventricular mechanical discoordination.

BACKGROUND: Integration of a patient's non-invasive imaging data in a digital twin (DT) of the heart can provide valuable insight into the myocardial disease substrates underlying left ventricular (LV) mechanical discoordination. However, when generating a DT, model parameters should be identifiable to obtain robust parameter estimations. In this study, we used the CircAdapt model of the human heart and circulation to find a subset of parameters which were identifiable from LV cavity volume and regional strain measurements of patients with different substrates of left bundle branch block (LBBB) and myocardial infarction (MI). To this end, we included seven patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and LBBB (study ID: 2018-0863, registration date: 2019-10-07), of which four were non-ischemic (LBBB-only) and three had previous MI (LBBB-MI), and six narrow QRS patients with MI (MI-only) (study ID: NL45241.041.13, registration date: 2013-11-12). Morris screening method (MSM) was applied first to find parameters which were important for LV volume, regional strain, and strain rate indices. Second, this parameter subset was iteratively reduced based on parameter identifiability and reproducibility. Parameter identifiability was based on the diaphony calculated from quasi-Monte Carlo simulations and reproducibility was based on the intraclass correlation coefficient ( ICC ) obtained from repeated parameter estimation using dynamic multi-swarm particle swarm optimization. Goodness-of-fit was defined as the mean squared error ( χ 2 ) of LV myocardial strain, strain rate, and cavity volume. RESULTS: A subset of 270 parameters remained after MSM which produced high-quality DTs of all patients ( χ 2 < 1.6), but minimum parameter reproducibility was poor ( ICC min = 0.01). Iterative reduction yielded a reproducible ( ICC min = 0.83) subset of 75 parameters, including cardiac output, global LV activation duration, regional mechanical activation delay, and regional LV myocardial constitutive properties. This reduced subset produced patient-resembling DTs ( χ 2 < 2.2), while septal-to-lateral wall workload imbalance was higher for the LBBB-only DTs than for the MI-only DTs (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: By applying sensitivity and identifiability analysis, we successfully determined a parameter subset of the CircAdapt model which can be used to generate imaging-based DTs of patients with LV mechanical discoordination. Parameters were reproducibly estimated using particle swarm optimization, and derived LV myocardial work distribution was representative for the patient's underlying disease substrate. This DT technology enables patient-specific substrate characterization and can potentially be used to support clinical decision making.

A porcine large animal model of radiofrequency ablation-induced left bundle branch block.

Background: Electrocardiographic (ECG) features of left bundle branch (LBB) block (LBBB) can be observed in up to 20%-30% of patients suffering from heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. However, predicting which LBBB patients will benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) or conduction system pacing remains challenging. This study aimed to establish a translational model of LBBB to enhance our understanding of its pathophysiology and improve therapeutic approaches. Methods: Fourteen male pigs underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation of the proximal LBB under fluoroscopy and ECG guidance. Comprehensive clinical assessments (12-lead ECG, bloodsampling, echocardiography, electroanatomical mapping) were conducted before LBBB induction, after 7, and 21 days. Three pigs received CRT pacemakers 7 days after LBB ablation to assess resynchronization feasibility. Results: Following proximal LBB ablation, ECGs displayed characteristic LBBB features, including QRS widening, slurring in left lateral leads, and QRS axis changes. QRS duration increased from 64.2 ± 4.2 ms to 86.6 ± 12.1 ms, and R wave peak time in V6 extended from 21.3 ± 3.6 ms to 45.7 ± 12.6 ms. Echocardiography confirmed cardiac electromechanical dyssynchrony, with septal flash appearance, prolonged septal-to-posterior-wall motion delay, and extended ventricular electromechanical delays. Electroanatomical mapping revealed a left ventricular breakthrough site shift and significantly prolonged left ventricular activation times. RF-induced LBBB persisted for 3 weeks. CRT reduced QRS duration to 75.9 ± 8.6 ms, demonstrating successful resynchronization. Conclusion: This porcine model accurately replicates the electrical and electromechanical characteristics of LBBB observed in patients. It provides a practical, cost-effective, and reproducible platform to investigate molecular and translational aspects of cardiac electromechanical dyssynchrony in a controlled and clinically relevant setting.

Concepts of Cardiac Dyssynchrony and Dynamic Approach.

Cardiac conduction involves electrical activity from one myocyte to another, creating coordinated contractions in each. Disruptions in the conducting system, such as left bundle branch block (LBBB), can result in premature activation of specific regions of the heart, leading to heart failure and increased morbidity and mortality. Structural alterations in T-tubules and the sarcoplasmic reticulum can lead to dyssynchrony, a condition that can be treated by cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), which stands as a cornerstone in this pathology. The heterogeneity in patient responses underscored the necessity of improving the diagnostic approach. Vectocardiography, ultra-high-frequency ECG, 3D echocardiography, and electrocardiographic imaging seem to offer advanced precision in identifying optimal candidates for CRT in addition to the classic diagnostic methods. The advent of His bundle pacing and left bundle branch pacing further refined the approach in the treatment of dyssynchrony, offering more physiological pacing modalities that promise enhanced outcomes by maintaining or restoring the natural sequence of ventricular activation. HOT-CRT emerges as a pivotal innovation combining the benefits of CRT with the precision of His bundle or left bundle branch area pacing to optimize cardiac function in a subset of patients where traditional CRT might fall short.

Successful prediction of left bundle branch block-induced cardiomyopathy and treatment effect by artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram.

BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch block (LBBB) induced cardiomyopathy is an increasingly recognized disease entity.  However, no clinical testing has been shown to be able to predict such an occurrence. CASE REPORT: A 70-year-old male with a prior history of LBBB with preserved ejection fraction (EF) and no other known cardiovascular conditions presented with presyncope, high-grade AV block, and heart failure with reduced EF (36%). His coronary angiogram was negative for any obstructive disease. No other known etiologies for cardiomyopathy were identified. Artificial intelligence-enabled ECGs performed 6 years prior to clinical presentation consistently predicted a high probability (up to 91%) of low EF. The patient successfully underwent left bundle branch area (LBBA) pacing with correction of the underlying LBBB. Subsequent AI ECGs showed a large drop in the probability of low EF immediately after LBBA pacing to 47% and then to 3% 2 months post procedure. His heart failure symptoms markedly improved and EF normalized to 54% at the same time. CONCLUSIONS: Artificial intelligence-enabled ECGS may help identify patients who are at risk of developing LBBB-induced cardiomyopathy and predict the response to LBBA pacing.

Pre-Existing Left Bundle Branch Block and Clinical Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Background: Few reports on pre-existing left bundle branch block (LBBB) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are currently available. Further, no present studies compare patients with new onset LBBB with those with pre-existing LBBB. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the association between pre-existing or new onset LBBB and clinical outcomes after TAVR. Methods: Using data from the Japanese multicenter registry, 5,996 patients who underwent TAVR between October 2013 and December 2019 were included. Patients were classified into 3 groups: no LBBB, pre-existing LBBB, and new onset LBBB. The 2-year clinical outcomes were compared between 3 groups using Cox proportional hazards models and propensity score analysis to adjust the differences in baseline characteristics. Results: Of 5,996 patients who underwent TAVR, 280 (4.6%) had pre-existing LBBB, while 1,658 (27.6%) experienced new onset LBBB. Compared with the no LBBB group, multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that pre-existing LBBB was associated not only with a higher 2-year all-cause (adjusted HR: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.06-1.82; P = 0.015) and cardiovascular (adjusted HR: 1.60; 95% CI: 1.04-2.48; P = 0.031) mortality, but also with higher all-cause (adjusted HR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.07-1.91; P = 0.016) and cardiovascular (adjusted HR: 1.81, 95% CI:1.12-2.93; P = 0.014) mortality than the new onset LBBB group. Heart failure was the most common cause of cardiovascular death, with more heart failure deaths in the pre-existing LBBB group. Conclusions: Pre-existing LBBB was independently associated with poor clinical outcomes, reflecting an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality after TAVR. Patients with pre-existing LBBB should be carefully monitored.

Prevalence and progression of LV dysfunction and dyssynchrony in patients with new-onset LBBB post TAVR.

BACKGROUND: The impact of new-onset left bundle branch block (N-LBBB) developing after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) on cardiac function and mechanical dyssynchrony is not well defined. METHODS: We retrospectively screened all patients who underwent TAVR in our centre between Oct 2018 and Sept 2021 (n = 409). We identified 38 patients with N-LBBB post-operatively (of which 28 were persistent and 10 were transient), and 17 patients with chronic pre-existent LBBB (C-LBBB). We excluded patients requiring pacing post TAVR. For all groups, we retrospectively analysed stored echocardiograms at 3 time points: before TAVR (T0), early after TAVR (T1, 1.2 ± 1.1 days), and late follow-up (T2, 1.5 ± 0.8 years), comparing LV mass and volumes, indices of LV function (LV ejection fraction, LVEF; global longitudinal strain, GLS), and mechanical dyssynchrony indices (systolic stretch index, severity of septal flash). RESULTS: At baseline (T0), C-LBBB had worse cardiac function, and larger LV volumes and LV mass, compared with patients with N-LBBB. At T1, N-LBBB resulted in mild dyssynchrony and decreased LVEF and GLS. Dyssynchrony progressed at T2 in persistent N-LBBB but not C-LBBB. In both groups however, LVEF remained stable at T2, although individual response was variable. Patients with better LVEF at baseline demonstrated a higher proportion of developing LBBB-induced LV dysfunction at T2. Lack of improvement of LVEF immediately after TAVR predicted deteriorating LVEF at T2. In transient LBBB, cardiac function and most dyssynchrony indices returned to baseline. CONCLUSIONS: N-LBBB after TAVR results in an immediate reduction of cardiac function, in spite of only mild dyssynchrony. When LBBB persists, patients with better cardiac function before TAVR are more likely to have LBBB-induced LV dysfunction after TAVR.

Outcomes with T-wave discordance of left bundle branch block and preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction.

AIMS: Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes for patients with heart failure. The prognosis of LBBB in patients with a preserved ejection fraction (EF) remains controversial. This study investigated the predictive value of T-wave discordance for the prognosis of patients with LBBB and preserved or mildly reduced EF. METHODS AND RESULTS: We enrolled 707 patients with complete LBBB and left ventricular (LV) EF ≥ 40% observed using electrocardiograms (ECGs) and echocardiograms between January 2010 and December 2018. Their serial ECGs were reviewed during the follow-up period. The T-wave pattern was classified as discordant LBBB (dLBBB) or concordant LBBB (cLBBB) according to the 12-lead ECG T-wave morphology. The primary outcome was the composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure during a median follow-up period of 3.1 years. A multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the independent predictors of the primary outcome. Patients with dLBBB had more comorbidities, a higher heart rate, a longer QRS and QTc duration, a larger LV end-systolic volume and left atrial dimension, a lower LVEF, and a higher mitral E/A ratio and E/e', compared with those with cLBBB. Older age [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.023, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.001-1.046, P = 0.023], history of heart failure (HR = 2.440, 95% CI = 1.524-3.905, P = 0.001), chronic kidney disease (HR = 1.917, 95% CI = 1.182-3.110, P = 0.008), larger LV end-systolic volume (HR = 1.046, 95% CI = 1.017-1.075, P = 0.002), lower LVEF (HR = 0.916, 95% CI = 0.885-0.948, P = 0.001), and presence of dLBBB (HR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.011-2.628, P = 0.032) were independent predictors of the primary outcome in patients with LBBB and LVEF ≥ 40%. The discordant or concordant T-wave morphology of LBBB could transform from one subtype to the other in up to 23% of the study population during the follow-up period, and individuals with persistent or transformed dLBBB faced an increased risk of cardiovascular death or non-fatal heart failure hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with LBBB and EF ≥ 40%, dLBBB serves as an independent predictor of a higher risk of cardiovascular death or non-fatal heart failure hospitalization.

Multidisciplinary approach to long-standing left bundle branch block with dyssynchrony and aortic stenosis: case report.

Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is recommended for patients with symptomatic heart failure in sinus rhythm with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35%, QRS duration ≥ 150 ms, and left bundle branch block (LBBB) morphology. However, when severe left ventricular dysfunction and cardiogenic shock are present, treatment paradigms are often limited to palliative medical therapy or advanced therapies with durable left ventricular assist device or heart transplant as the functional and survival benefit of CRT in these patients remains uncertain. Case summary: A 77-year-old white man with long-standing LBBB with dyssynchrony, severely reduced LVEF of 4%, and severe bicuspid aortic stenosis (AS) presented with worsening heart failure symptoms. After multidisciplinary heart team evaluation and pre-operative optimization, the patient underwent a surgical aortic valve replacement with simultaneous intraoperative initiation of CRT with pacemaker (CRT-P) and temporary mechanical circulatory support. Echocardiography at 44 days and 201 days post-discharge showed an LVEF of 29% and 40%, respectively. Discussion: This case demonstrates that reverse remodelling and native heart recovery were successfully achieved in a patient with advanced structural heart disease, presenting with cardiogenic shock, through an early and aggressive approach involving multidisciplinary heart team evaluation, treatment of severe AS with surgical aortic valve replacement, prophylactic intraoperative initiation of temporary mechanical circulatory support, and early initiation of CRT-P.