Current Concepts and Recent Updates of Optical Biometry- A Comprehensive Review.

One of the most recent advancements in the field of cataract surgery is optical biometry. With the advent of optical biometry ocular measurements are now simpler, quicker, and more precise. The devices have made intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations easier in difficult situations too, such as in cases with extremes of axial lengths, silicone filled eyes, cataract surgery in post-keratoplasty eyes, post Laser-Assisted in Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) eyes, etc. The gold standard for IOL power calculation in the present day is by the use of optical biometry devices. The anatomical measurements by these devices are highly precise and because of these measurements and the incorporation of various IOL power calculation formulas the optical biometry devices give the accurate power and the post-operative visual outcome is highly satisfactory among the patients. The growing use of these devices has made cataract the most commonly performed refractive surgical procedure nowadays. In the current scenario, optical biometry has widespread acceptance in almost all countries and has many advantages over ultrasound or immersion biometry. Cataract surgeons can obtain easy and reliable measurements from these devices. Refractive surprises have also decreased considerably with their use. This article will comprehensively review the principles of the various optical biometry devices, the parameters used in each of the devices, the advantages and disadvantages, and add more like what all this article will add.

Corneal Characteristics of Myopic Malay School Children and Their Association with Axial Length.

Introduction: Corneal characteristics are unique to each eye and can vary among different levels of refractive errors. However, minimal data are available in the literature on corneal characteristics in myopic Malay school children including the difference between the low myopic group and the moderate myopic group. Therefore, this study aims to determine the corneal characteristics of myopic Malay school children and their associations with axial length. Methods: A total of eighty-four data samples were extracted from forty-two myopic Malay school children. Measurements of the central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal curvature, corneal diameter, and axial length were measured using Lenstar LS900, a non-contact optical biometer. Data were later stratified by the spherical equivalent refraction (SER) into a low myopic group and a moderate myopic group, and paired t-test were employed to determine the differences in the corneal characteristics between these two groups. Univariate and multivariate linear regressions were performed to identify factors that are significantly associated with axial length. Results: There was no significant difference in the CCT, corneal curvature and corneal diameter between the low myopic group and the moderate myopic group (t82=0.015, P=0.99), (t82=-0.802, P=0.43) and (t82=-0.575, P=0.57), respectively. Pearson univariate correlation analysis found that axial length significantly correlated with corneal curvature (r=-0.765, P<0.001) and corneal diameter (r=0.614, P<0.001) but no significant correlation found with CCT (r=0.046, P=0.68). Multiple regression analysis showed that axial length was significantly associated with a flatter corneal curvature (P<0.001), older age (P<0.001) and larger corneal diameter (P=0.02). Conclusion: This study reported the corneal characteristics in myopic Malay school children and its associations with axial length. Results of this study can serve as a reference value for the myopic Malay schoolchild population.

Central anterior chamber depth correlated with white-to-white distance in normal, long, and short eyes.

PURPOSE: To explore the associations between central anterior chamber depth (CACD) and other anterior segment biometric parameters and to determine the possible determinants of CACD in short, normal, and long eyes. METHODS: The biometric data of pre-operation patients aged 50-80 years with coexisting cataract and primary angle-closure disease or senile cataract were reviewed. Axial length (AL), CACD, lens thickness (LT), central corneal thickness (CCT), and white-to-white distance (WTW) were measured by Lenstar optical biometry (Lenstar 900). The data of 100 normal eyes (AL = 22 to 26 mm), 100 short eyes (AL ≤ 22 mm), and 100 long eyes (AL ≥ 26 mm) were consecutively collected for subsequent analyses. RESULTS: The mean age of the subjects was 66.60 ± 7.85 years, with 25.7% of the sample being men. Both CACD and WTW were found to be smallest in short eyes and were smaller in normal eyes than in long eyes (F = 126.524, P < 0.001; F = 28.458, P < 0.001). The mean LT was significantly thicker in short eyes than in normal and long eyes (4.66 mm versus 4.49 mm versus 4.40 mm; F = 18.099, P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in CCT between the three AL groups (F = 2.135, P = 0.120). Stepwise regression analysis highlighted AL, LT, and WTW as three independent factors associated with CACD in the normal AL group. In the short AL group and long AL group, LT and WTW were independent factors associated with CACD. CONCLUSIONS: CACD increases as AL elongates and reaches a peak when AL exceeds 26 mm. Furthermore, CACD showed inverse correlation with LT and positive correlation with WTW. A relatively small WTW results in an anteriorly positioned lens, and thus, a decrease in CACD.

Comparison of keratometric values and anterior segment parameters measured using Scheimpflug Sirius topography and Lenstar biometry.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the consistency of preoperative keratometric values, anterior segment, and intraocular lens (IOL) power measurements in patients with cataract and no comorbidities using the Sirius topography device (CSO, Italy) and Lenstar LS 900 (Haag-Streit AG, Köeniz, Switzerland). METHODS: Patients with grade 2 and 3 cataracts who applied to Ophthalmology Clinic of Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences and planned for cataract surgery were included the study. Forty eyes with cataract from 40 patients were taken in the study. All patients underwent preoperative assessment using a combined Scheimpflug-Placido disc-based tomography device (Sirius) and Lenstar before cataract surgery. Keratometric measurements, such as flat keratometry (K1), steep keratometry (K2), and maximum keratometry (Kmax), and anterior segment parameters, white-to-white (WTW) distance, IOL power, astigmatism (AST), anterior chamber depth (ACD), aqueous depth (AD), and central cornea thickness (CCT), were recorded. RESULTS: There were significant differences between K1Lenstar and K1Sirius, K2Lenstar and K2Sirius, KmaxLenstar and KmaxSirius, WTWLenstar and WTWSirius, and IOL powerLenstar versus IOL powerSirius. However, there were insignificant differences between ASTLenstar and ASTSirius, ACDLenstar versus ACDSirius, ADLenstar and ADSirius, and CCTLenstar and CCTSirius variables. Furthermore, it was found that Sirius measured significantly higher than Lenstar, especially in terms of IOL power. CONCLUSION: Significant differences were observed between Lenstar and Sirius in terms of keratometric values, WTW distance, and IOL power. The IOL power value measured with Sirius was found to be higher than the IOL power value measured with Lenstar.

Comparison of IOL Master 700 versus Lenstar LS900 for preoperative biometric measurement and intraocular lens calculation in cataract patients with high myopia / 国际眼科杂志(Guoji Yanke Zazhi)

AIM:To compare the differences, correlations and consistency of IOL Master 700 or Lenstar LS900 in preoperative ocular biometry and the accuracy of intraocular lens(IOL)degree calculation of cataract patients with high myopia.METHODS: Retrospective study. A total of 136 cases(136 eyes)of high myopia and cataract patients who underwent phacoemulsification at the ophthalmology department of Army Medical Center of PLA from March 2021 to March 2023 were collected, with a mean age of 57.38±8.08 years. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on axial length(AL): 41 eyes in group A(26 mm≤ AL ≤28 mm), 43 eyes in group B(28 mm&#x003C; AL ≤30 mm)and 52 eyes in group C(AL &#x003E;30 mm). AL, mean keratometry(Km), anterior chamber depth(ACD), lens thickness(LT)and white-to-white(WTW)were preoperatively measured by two instruments, respectively. Barrett Universal II formula was used to calculate the IOL degrees of all patients, the appropriate reserved diopter was decided individually, and the prediction error(PE)and absolute error(AE)of the two instruments were compared.RESULTS:The AL and ACD of patients in the three groups measured by Lenstar LS900 were higher than the AL measurd by IOL Master 700(all P&#x003C;0.05), with a difference of AL measured by the two devices: group C&#x003E;group B&#x003E;group A. However, there was no statistical significance in LT, Km, and WTW measured by the two instruments(all P&#x003E;0.05). All biometric parameters measured by the two devices were positively correlated(all r&#x003E;0.9, P&#x003C;0.05), and consistent(95% LoA of all groups were narrow). There was no statistically significant difference in AE calculated by the two devices(P&#x003E;0.05), but the IOL Master 700 calculated a smaller PE than Lenstar LS900(P&#x003C;0.05), with lower percentage of hyperopic shift in IOL Master 700.CONCLUSION:In cataract patients with high myopia, AL measured by Lenstar LS900 is longer than that by IOL Master 700, and the differences of AL increase along with the growth of AL. Both devices have a good prediction for IOL calculation, but IOL Master 700 has less refractive error, lower percentage of hyperopic shift, and greater clinical advantages IOL Master 700.

Lenstar LS900 vs EchoScan US-800: comparison between optical and ultrasound biometry with and without contact lenses and its relationship with other biometric parameters.

BACKGROUND: Due to the increasing use of contact lenses (CL) and the interest in ocular and body size relationships, this study aimed to compare measurements from two biometers (contact ultrasonic EchoScan US-800 and non-contact optical Lenstar LS900) with and without CL and to explore the relationship between ocular and body biometric parameters. DESIGN AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study measured ocular biometry using two biometers along with their body height and right foot length in 50 participants. Differences between biometry data from the two devices were compared and correlations between ocular and body biometric values were analyzed. RESULTS: All parameters showed interbiometric differences (p ≤ 0.030), except crystalline lens thickness during CL wear (p = 0.159). Comparing measurements with and without CL, differences were observed in axial length (p < 0.001), vitreous length measured by optical biometer (p = 0.016), and anterior chamber depth by ultrasonic biometer (p < 0.016). Lens thickness remained unaffected (p ≥ 0.190). Body height and foot length were correlated with anterior chamber depth, vitreous length, and axial length (p ≤ 0.019, r ≥ 0.330). Most biometric parameters were correlated among them using both devices (p ≤ 0.037, r ≥ 0.296). CONCLUSIONS: These biometers are not interchangeable and CL affects measurements. Body height and foot length correlate with ocular dimensions, and most ocular biometric values correlate positively.

Comparing Predictive Accuracy of a Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometer and an Optical Low Coherence Reflectometry Biometer.

Purpose: To compare the refractive accuracy resulting from calculations based on measurements with a swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) biometer compared to calculations based on measurements with an optical low coherence reflectometry (OLCR) biometer at one month postoperatively. Methods: This was a retrospective comparative non-interventional study of preoperative biometry and postoperative refraction and visual acuity of 200 eyes. All eyes had preoperative biometry with both the Argos (Movu, a Santec company) and Lenstar LS900 (Haag-Streit AG) devices. Data were collected for mean postoperative prediction error (directional and absolute), preoperative mean K, delta K (corneal astigmatism), axial length, and anterior chamber depth. Results: The mean directional prediction error was -0.15 ± 0.47 D for Argos and -0.31 ± 0.50 D for Lenstar LS900, and there was a statistically significant mean of the differences (0.16 ± 0.24 D; p < 0.001). The mean absolute prediction error was 0.35 ± 0.34 D for Argos and 0.42 ± 0.41 D for Lenstar LS900, and there was a statistically significant mean of the differences (-0.07 ± 0.24 D; p < 0.001). Neither the differences in directional prediction error nor the differences in absolute prediction error were clinically significant. Conclusion: The directional and absolute prediction accuracies were statistically significant, but not clinically different between the Argos and Lenstar LS900 devices. In addition, differences between preoperative K, AL, and ACD measurements were not clinically significant.

Agreement between a Spectral-Domain Ocular Coherence Tomography Biometer with a Swept-Source Ocular Coherence Tomography Biometer and an Optical Low-Coherence Reflectometry Biometer in Eyes with Cataract.

Purpose: To assess the agreement between biometric parameters measured by a spectral-domain optical coherence tomography optical biometer device (Optopol Revo NX) with a validated swept-source biometer (IOLMaster 700) and a validated optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer (Lenstar LS 900), in cataract surgery candidates. Methods: In this prospective comparative study, 100 patients (100 eyes) who were eligible for cataract surgery were involved. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess agreement between devices for biometric parameters including axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and central corneal thickness (CCT). Results: AL measurements were successful in 82 eyes (82.0%) with Revo NX, in 91 eyes (91.0%) with Lenstar LS 900, and in 97 eyes (97.0%) with IOLMaster 700. When Revo NX was compared to IOL Master 700 and Lenstar LS 900, the mean differences were as follows: -0.02 ± 0.02 mm and -0.02 ± 0.03 mm (P = 0.313, P = 0.525) for AL, 0.01 ± 0.03 mm and 0.10 ± 0.03 mm (P = 0.691, P = 0.002) for ACD, -0.15 ± 0.03 mm and 0.001 ± 0.04 mm (P < 0.001, P = 0.95) for LT, and -2.29 ± 0.92 µm, and 0.73 ± 1.43 µm (P = 0.015, P = 0.612) for CCT. Three devices were highly correlated for AL, ACD, LT, and CCT (interclass correlation coefficient > 0.75). Bland-Altman plots showed a narrower 95% limit of agreement (-0.35 to 0.31) between Revo NX and IOLMaster 700 in measuring AL. Conclusions: Despite the higher measurement failure rate in eyes with cataract, the Revo NX showed very good agreement with the IOLMaster 700 and Lenstar LS 900 optical biometers in measuring AL, ACD, LT, and CCT. However, ACD and LT measurements cannot be considered interchangeable between these devices.

Repetibilidad y comparabilidad de un nuevo tomógrafo con tecnología SS-OCT en biometría óptica / Repeatability and comparability of a new swept-source optical coherence tomographer in optical biometry

Objetivo Evaluar la reproducibilidad en la medición de los parámetros biométricos utilizando un nuevo biómetro por tomografía de coherencia óptica con fuente de barrido y compararlo con un biómetro por reflectometría óptica de baja coherencia. Diseño Estudio observacional, descriptivo, de corte transversal. Método Se incluyeron 45 ojos derechos de 45 pacientes, a los que se realizó tres mediciones consecutivas con el biómetro Anterion y una con el biómetro Lenstar LS900. Se recogieron las siguientes variables: longitud axial (AXL), profundidad de cámara anterior (ACD), K plana (K1), K curva (K2), grosor corneal central (CCT), grosor del cristalino (LT) y distancia blanco-blanco (WTW). Para evaluar la repetibilidad se calculó el coeficiente de Pearson «R» y la desviación estándar intrasujeto (Sw). Para evaluar la comparabilidad entre los biómetros se utilizó el coeficiente de correlación de concordancia (CCC) y el coeficiente de correlación intraclase (CCI). Además, se realizaron gráficos de Bland-Altman para cada variable. Resultados El coeficiente de Pearson fue excelente y estadísticamente significativo en la evaluación de la repetibilidad para todas las variables. Los valores más altos fueron 0,987 (AXL), 0,983 (CCT) y 0,942 (ACD). No hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre las repetidas mediciones con Anterion para todas las variables. Los valores de CCC y CCI fueron excelentes en la evaluación de las variables AXL, CCT y ACD, y fueron altos para las variables K1, K2, LT y WTW. Conclusiones La realización de una biometría óptica ocular con el biómetro SS-OCT Anterion es un procedimiento reproducible y comparable con el biómetro Lenstar LS900 (AU)

Purpose To evaluate the reproducibility in the measurement of ocular biometric parameters using a new swept-source optical coherence tomographer and its comparability with an optical low coherence reflectometry biometer. Design An observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study. Methods 45 right eyes of 45 patients diagnosed with cataract were included. Three successive biometric measurements with Anterion and one with Lenstar LS900 were performed on each patient. The following variables were collected: axial length (AXL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), flat K (K1), steep K (K2), central corneal thickness (CCT), lens thickness (LT) and white-to-white distance (WTW). The intrasubject standard deviation (Sw) and the coefficient of Pearson «R» were calculated in order to assess the repeatability. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) were obtained to evaluate the comparability between devices. A Bland–Altman plot was performed for each variable. Results The coefficient of Pearson was excellent and statistically significant in the evaluation of the repeatability in all the variables. The highest values were 0.987 (AXL), 0.983 (CCT) and 0.942 (ACD). There were no statically significant differences between repeated measurements with Anterion in all the parameters. The ICC and CCC were excellent in the evaluation of AXL, CCT and ACD, and were also good in regard to K1, K2, LT and WTW. Conclusions Performing biometry with the SS-OCT Anterion is a reliable and reproducible procedure, and it is comparable with the Lenstar LS900 (AU)

Repeatability and comparability of a new swept-source optical coherence tomographer in optical biometry.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the reproducibility in the measurement of ocular biometric parameters using a new swept-source optical coherence tomographer and its comparability with an optical low coherence reflectometry biometer. DESIGN: An observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study. METHODS: 45 right eyes of 45 patients diagnosed with cataract were included. Three successive biometric measurements with Anterion and one with Lenstar LS900 were performed on each patient. The following variables were collected: axial length (AXL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), flat K (K1), steep K (K2), central corneal thickness (CCT), lens thickness (LT) and white-to-white distance (WTW). The intrasubject standard deviation (Sw) and the coefficient of Pearson "R" were calculated in order to assess the repeatability. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) were obtained to evaluate the comparability between devices. A Bland-Altman plot was performed for each variable. RESULTS: The coefficient of Pearson was excellent and statistically significant in the evaluation of the repeatability in all the variables. The highest values were 0.987 (AXL), 0.983 (CCT) and 0.942 (ACD). There were no statically significant differences between repeated measurements with Anterion in all the parameters. The ICC and CCC were excellent in the evaluation of AXL, CCT and ACD, and were also good in regard to K1, K2, LT and WTW. CONCLUSIONS: Performing biometry with the SS-OCT Anterion is a reliable and reproducible procedure, and it is comparable with the Lenstar LS900.

Comparison of optical biometry and conventional acoustic biometry in the axial length measurement in silicone oil-filled eyes.

Purpose: To compare the axial length (AL) obtained by A-scan biometry (PAC SCAN 300AP; Sonomed Escalon, USA) and LENSTAR-LS 900 (Haag-Streit, Koeniz, Switzerland) in silicone oil (SiO)-filled eyes. Methods: AL measurements were taken in 50 SiO-filled eyes using A-scan and LENSTAR-LS 900 before SiO removal and 1 month following SiO removal. In the subset of patients requiring intraocular lens (IOL) insertion, the predicted refraction and the refraction obtained were compared. IOL power in these patients was calculated using SRK-T formula and the AL obtained by LENSTAR. Results: In SiO-filled eyes, a significant difference was noted between the AL values obtained using the two methods (P = 0.0002). No significant difference was noted after SiO removal (P = 0.634). In the subset of patients needing IOL insertion, no significant difference (P = 0.07) was seen between target refractive error and postoperative refractive error (mean deviation from the target being 0.176 diopter). AL of an SiO-filled eye is more accurately measured using optical low coherence reflectometry (OLCR)-based biometry (LENSTAR) than with conventional acoustic biometry (A-scan). Conclusion: We conclude that LENSTAR gives more accurate biometry in an SiO-filled eye. The AL obtained after SiO removal was comparable and showed no significant difference.

Ocular Biometric Values and Prevalence of Corneal Astigmatism in Patients Candidate for Cataract Surgery.

Purpose: To analyze the biometric values and the prevalence of corneal astigmatism in cataract surgery candidates. Methods: This is a prospective study. Ocular biometric values and corneal keratometric astigmatism were measured by optical low-coherence reflectometry (Lenstar LS 900) before surgery in patients who were candidates for cataract extraction surgery. Descriptive measurements of biometric dimensions and keratometric cylinder data and their correlations with sex and age were evaluated. Results: Ocular biometric and keratometric values from 2084 eyes of 2084 patients (mean age 66.43, range 19-95 years) were analyzed. The mean values were as follows: corneal astigmatism 0.89 diopter (D), mean corneal keratometry 44.29 D, central corneal thickness 534 µ, internal anterior chamber depth (ACD) 3.11 mm, lens thickness 4.50 mm, and axial length 23.35 mm. Corneal astigmatism was <1.25 D in 1660 (79.5%) of eyes. Astigmatism was with-the-rule in 976 (46.8%) of eyes, against-the-rule (ATR) in 702 (33.7%), and oblique in 406 (19.5%). Analysis of corneal astigmatism revealed a change toward "ATR" with age which was not statistically significant. The ACD was correlated with age. The amount of corneal astigmatism had no correlation with age and sex. Conclusion: Corneal astigmatism was higher than 1.25 D in about 21% of cataract surgery candidates with slight differences between the various age ranges and had no correlation with age and sex.

Agreement analysis of Lenstar with other four techniques of biometry before cataract surgery.

PURPOSE: To test whether some biometry measurements provided by the Lenstar LS900 compared well with the AL-Scan, Pentacam rotating Scheimpflug camera, Ultrasound Biomicroscopy (UBM) and Tomey EM-3000. METHODS: Two hundred and one patients having routine cataract surgery had standard preoperative assessment. In this clinical study, the axis length (AL) and lens thickness (LT) were taken by Lenstar LS900 and AL-Scan; anterior chamber depth (ACD) was taken by Lenstar LS900, A-Scan, Pentacam and UBM; central corneal thickness (CCT) was taken by Lenstar LS900, Pentacam and Tomey EM-3000. The results were compared using a Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U test and Pearson correlation calculations. Agreement was assessed through intraclass correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: The highest correlation was found between Lenstar and AL-Scan for AL (r = 0.975; P < 0.001). For LT measurements, the correlation between these two devices was also good (r = 0.699; P < 0.001). Excellent correlations were showed between Lenstar and Pentacam or UBM for ACD (r = 0.948, 0.704, respectively, both P < 0.001), but not between Lenstar and AL-Scan (r = 0.453, P < 0.001). The correlations of CCT between Lenstar and Pentacam or Tomey EM-3000 were both excellent (r = 0.817, 0.882, respectively, both P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In phakic eyes of cataract patients, measurements of AL, LT, ACD and CCT from Lenstar LS900 yielded results that correlated very well with other clinical instruments.

Comparison of preoperative angle kappa measurements in the eyes of cataract patients obtained from Pentacam Scheimpflug system, optical low-coherence reflectometry, and ray-tracing aberrometry.

BACKGROUND: Angle kappa plays a vital role in the implantation of multifocal intraocular lens (MIOL). Large angle kappa is related to a higher risk of postoperative photic phenomena. This study aims to compare preoperative angle kappa in the eyes of cataract patients obtained from the Pentacam Scheimpflug system (Pentacam), optical low-coherence reflectometry (Lenstar), and ray-tracing aberrometry (iTrace). METHODS: One hundred thirteen eyes of 113 patients with cataracts were included. Each eye was examined 3 times using all devices to obtain angle kappa and pupil diameter. When considering dependent eyes for one individual, angle kappa in both right eyes and left eyes should be analysed separately. The repeatability and reproducibility were evaluated using the within-subject standard deviation (Sw), repeatability (2.77 Sw), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The difference, correlation, and agreement between devices were evaluated by paired t-tests, Pearson tests, and Bland-Altman analysis, respectively. RESULTS: Intraoperator repeatability and interoperator and intersession reproducibility of angle kappa showed an Sw of less than 0.05 mm, a 2.77 Sw of 0.14 mm or less, and an ICC of more than 0.96. Angle kappa was not significantly different between Pentacam and Lenstar (P > 0.05), while angle kappa was significantly different between Pentacam and iTrace and between Lenstar and iTrace (P < 0.05). There was a strong correlation between Pentacam and Lenstar for angle kappa (r =0.907 to 0.918) and a weak or moderate correlation between Pentacam and iTrace and between Lenstar and iTrace (r =0.292 to 0.618). There were narrow 95% limits of agreement (LoA) between Pentacam and Lenstar for angle kappa and wide 95% LoA between Pentacam and iTrace and between Lenstar and iTrace. No significant differences in pupil diameter were found between Pentacam and Lenstar in either eye (P > 0.05). Positive angle kappa (nasal light reflex) was found in most cataract patients (79.25% to 84.91%) through 3 different devices in both eyes. CONCLUSIONS: The 3 devices provided high intraoperator repeatability and interoperator and intersession reproducibility for angle kappa measurements. The measurement of preoperative angle kappa in the eyes of patients with cataracts by Pentacam and Lenstar has good agreement.

Comparing low-coherence interferometry and A-scan ultrasonography in measuring ocular axial dimensions in young rhesus monkeys.

We investigated a commercial low-coherence interferometer (LenStar LS 900 optical biometer) in measuring young rhesus monkey ocular dimensions. Ocular biometry data obtained using a LenStar and an A-scan ultrasound instrument (OPT-scan 1000) from 163 rhesus monkeys during 20-348 days of age were compared by means of coefficients of concordance and 95% limits of agreement. Linear regression was employed to examine and analyze the inter-instrument discrepancies. In young rhesus monkeys, the test-retest reliability of the LenStar was equal to or exceeded that of A-scan ultrasound (intraclass correlation = 0.86 to 0.93). The inter-instrument agreement was strong for vitreous chamber depth and axial length (coefficient of concordance = 0.95 and 0.86, respectively) and moderate for anterior chamber depth and lens thickness (coefficient of concordance = 0.74 and 0.63, respectively). The LenStar systematically underestimated ocular dimensions when compared to A-scan ultrasound (mean magnitude of difference = 0.11-0.57 mm). This difference could be minimized using linear calibration functions to equate LenStar data with ultrasound data. When this method was applied, the values between instruments were in excellent absolute agreement (mean magnitude of difference = 0.004-0.01 mm). In conclusion, the LenStar reliably measured ocular dimensions in young monkeys. When an appropriate calibration function is applied, the LenStar can be used as a substitute for A-scan ultrasonography.

Repeatability and reproducibility of manual choroidal thickness measurement using Lenstar images in children before and after orthokeratology treatment.

PURPOSE: To investigate the repeatability and reproducibility of choroidal thickness measurements using Lenstar images in young myopic children before and after one-month orthokeratology (ortho-k) treatment. METHOD: Ocular biometry of 39 subjects were performed using the Lenstar 900. The first five measurements with maximum differences of 0.02 mm in axial length in the right eyes were saved and used for measurement of choroidal thickness. Subfoveal choroidal thickness were manually measured by identifying the signals from the retinal pigmented epithelium layer and chorioscleral interface. Repeatability was determined by comparing measurements of the same images made by the same observer on two separate occasions (four weeks apart), while reproducibility was calculated by comparing measurements of the same images made by two independent observers. Data was analysed using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) and non-parametric Bland and Altman plots. RESULTS: The choroidal peaks could not be identified in all five measurements in all subjects. On average, only 71% subjects had at least four definable images. Compared with the use of fewer than four images, reliability using an average of four definable images improved statistically, but remained clinically unacceptable (>10 µm), although pre- and post-ortho-k ICC values were good to excellent for repeatability (0.867 and 0.975, respectively) and excellent and good for reproducibility (0.959 and 0.868, respectively). Non-parametric pre- and post-ortho-k limits of agreement (2.5% and 97.5% percentiles) obtained were -45.8 to 79.3 µm and -30.3 to 9.5 µm, respectively for repeatability, and -29.0 to 33.5 µm and -21.8 to 70.0 µm, respectively for reproducibility. CONCLUSION: Choroidal thickness measurements using the Lenstar did not show good reliability, despite the high ICC values, non-parametric Bland and Altman plots demonstrated a wide variability of measurement errors. Any changes in subfoveal choroidal thickness, measured by Lenstar, of <80 µm may not represent real changes.

Analysis of biometric parameters of 2340 eyes measured with optical biometer Lenstar LS900 in a Caucasian population.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the pattern and mutual relationships between basic biometric characteristics of the eye in a Central European Caucasian population. METHODS: A single-centre retrospective study of 2340 patients (965 males, 1375 females) scheduled for cataract surgery between 2014 and 2016. Measurements using laser interferometry included AL (axial length), K (average corneal curvature), ACD (anterior chamber depth), LT (lens thickness), CCT (central corneal thickness), AST (astigmatism) and WTW (white to white). Subjects were stratified by gender and controlled for age. Descriptive, correlation and regression analyses were performed on the data. RESULTS: The mean AL was 23.33 ± 1.01 mm - higher in males (23.59 ± 0.99 mm), in comparison to females (23.15 ± 0.99 mm). The elderly had lower ACD and higher LT, while males had higher AL independent of age. Furthermore, LT and K decreased with AL, while ACD decreased with LT and increased with AL independent of age and gender. CONCLUSIONS: The estimates of the biometrics are obtained on a large sample of subjects and can serve as normative values for Lenstar LS900 in the Central European Caucasian population.

To compare on-axis measurements of the axial length with off-axis measurements in the paracentral horizontal and vertical positions.

PURPOSE: To compare on-axis measurements of the axial length (AL) with off-axis measurements in the paracentral horizontal and vertical positions using the Lenstar LS 900 biometer. METHODS: In this, the samples were selected from patients scheduled for cataract surgery using a systematic randomization method. After applying the exclusion criteria, all subjects underwent optometric examinations and AL measurement using the Lenstar. Five consecutive, non-cycloplegic measurements were done on the right eye centrally, 10° temporally, 10° nasally, 10° superiorly and 10° inferiorly on the retina by the same examiner. RESULTS: Two hundred and seven eyes were examined in this study, of which 126 (60%) were for female patients. The mean age of the participants was 64.32 ± 10.77 years (range: 34-91 years). The mean central, superior, inferior, temporal, and nasal axial AL was 23.22 ± 1.02, 23.21 ± 1.02, 23.21 ± 1.02, 23.21 ± 1.02, 23.20 ± 1.03, respectively. Comparison of these readings using repeated measures ANOVA showed a statistically significant difference in the AL value among these positions. According to the post-hoc results, superior and nasal AL was statistically significantly lower compared to the central AL. CONCLUSION: If on-axis biometry is not available, AL can be measured in an off-axis manner in the paracentral temporal, superior and inferior positions. Considering the marked difference in AL measurement between central and nasal positions, off-axis measurement is not recommended in the nasal part because it may be associated with a marked hyperopic shift after cataract surgery.

Anterior chamber depth measurement using Pentacam and Biograph in children.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Accurate measurement of the anterior chamber depth is very important. There is no report regarding the agreement between rotating Scheimpflug imaging (Pentacam HR) and biograph (Lenstar LS 900) in children. This study therefore explores the agreement between Pentacam and Biograph in measuring anterior chamber depth in children. BACKGROUND: This study aims to determine the agreement between Pentacam and Biograph in measuring anterior chamber depth in children. METHODS: The participants were students living in urban and rural areas of Shahroud, Iran, selected through cluster sampling. The students were transported to the examination site to undergo imaging and optometric tests. Pentacam imaging was then conducted, and biograph was used to measure biometric components. In this report, the anterior chamber depth was calculated from the corneal endothelium. RESULTS: Of 6624 students selected randomly, 5620 participated in the study. After applying the exclusion criteria, 4882 eyes were included in the final analysis. The mean anterior chamber depth measured by the Pentacam (3.09 ± 0.26 mm) was higher than that of biograph (3.04 ± 0.24 mm) (p < 0.001). The 95% limit of agreement (LOA) between the two devices was -0.19 to 0.09 mm. The variation of the difference between the two devices decreased, LOA became narrower, and the correlation coefficient of the devices increased with ageing. The highest intraclass correlation coefficient was seen among myopic (0.974) participants. The 95% LOA was -0.20 to 0.12 mm in hyperopic, -0.17 to 0.07 mm in myopic and -0.19 to 0.09 mm in emmetropic participants. CONCLUSION: The Pentacam and Biograph can be used interchangeably for measuring the anterior chamber depth in children.

Slit-lamp measurement of anterior chamber depth and its agreement with anterior segment optical coherence tomography and Lenstar LS 900 in pseudoexfoliation and normal eyes.

PURPOSE: There is a considerable lack of awareness of slit-lamp measurement of anterior chamber depth (ACD) by the Redmond Smith method (SACD) in present day-to-day clinical practice, which may provide rapid assessment in pseudoexfoliation (PXF) when assessing for angle closure and planning for cataract surgery. This assumes importance not only in outreach clinics but also in the ongoing pandemic caused by the highly contagious novel coronavirus, where social distancing is advocated to contain the spread. We aimed to compare the axial ACD in PXF and normal patients by SACD, and its agreement with the anterior segment optical coherence tomography (ASOCT) and LenstarLS-900. METHODS: A prospective comparative observational study was done at a tertiary eye care hospital. A PXF group and a normal group of controls were recruited. All eyes were phakic with normal cornea. Any eye with previous intraocular/refractive surgery and cause of other secondary or uncontrolled glaucoma was excluded. SACD was measured clinically via slit-lamp method and also via ASOCT and Lenstar; agreement between the methodologies was plotted. RESULTS: Fifty patients were recruited in each group. Mean age was 66.82 ± 4.88 years in PXF patients and 65 ± 5.46 years in controls (P = 0.2). ACD was found to be greater in controls compared with the PXF patients; this difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001) across all methodologies. A good agreement with narrow 95% limits of agreement was found between these methodologies. CONCLUSION: Redmond Smith slit-lamp methodology of estimating the axial ACD is recommended as a rapid, quantifiable, noncontact screening technique during routine examination, especially in primary outreach centers, and is also advantageous during the ongoing pandemic by reducing expendable investigations.