Models of care: Opportunities and challenges.

Perinatal mental health models can broadly be described by scope and structure. Within these two broad domains lies an array of diverse methodologies that have attempted to increase access and coordination of care. These efforts have uncovered many opportunities that, if addressed, may improve our current parent and infant outcomes within our healthcare system and community. Furthermore, there are several opportunities that, if addressed, will result in more equitable, inclusive care. These include being attentive to the unique needs of vulnerable populations, emphasizing community efforts, and closing the current gaps in legislation.

Maternal Transport, What Do We Know: A Narrative Review.

Objective: This review examines the initial development of a transport system for neonates, followed by a subsequent evolution of a transportation system for the maternal/fetal unit, and then a maternal transport system (antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum) to specifically address maternal morbidity/mortality. Methods: A literature search was undertaken using the electronic databases PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL. The search terms used were "maternal transport" AND "perinatal care" OR "labor" "obstetrics" OR "delivery". The years searched were 1960-2023. Results: There were 260 abstracts identified and 52 of those are the basis of this review. The utilization of a transportation system with the regionalization of levels of care has resulted in a significant reduction in neonatal, perinatal, and maternal morbidity and mortality. Although preterm delivery remains a concern in women transported, the number of deliveries that have occurred during transport is relatively small. Reimbursement for transportation continues to be a problem in several states. Conclusion: A state-of-the-art transportation system has evolved that transfers neonates, maternal/fetal dyad, and pregnant women (antepartum, intrapartum, postpartum) to the appropriate level of care facility to ensure the best maternal/fetal/neonatal outcomes.

Characterising use of recovery record among a large, transdiagnostic sample of adults with eating disorders across higher levels of care.

OBJECTIVE: Smartphone applications (i.e., apps) designed to target mental health symptoms have received increasing public and empirical attention, including in eating disorder|eating disorders (EDs) treatment. While some data have begun to characterise app users in non-controlled settings, there is limited information on use of apps in higher levels of care (e.g., partial hospitalisation or residential treatment programs) for EDs. METHOD: This study aimed to explore metrics of use while in treatment for a commonly used ED-focused mobile app (Recovery Record) among individuals enroled in intensive outpatient, partial hospitalisation, residential, or inpatient treatments (N = 2042). RESULTS: Results indicated that older individuals and participants with binge eating disorder demonstrated more frequent app engagement compared to younger participants and other ED diagnoses, respectively. Individuals entering at intensive outpatient and partial hospitalisation levels of care, as well as those with routine discharges engaged more frequently with RR compared to individuals entering in inpatient or residential treatment, and those with non-routine discharges. CONCLUSIONS: Our data provide initial descriptions of how RR may be used within higher levels of care for adults with EDs. Further work is needed to establish the benefit of these apps in clinical settings for EDs over and above standard treatment, better characterise for whom these apps provide benefit, and identify how best to tailor the experience to promote engagement across the full spectrum of ED patients.

A brief examination of treatment outcomes in higher levels of care for individuals with eating disorders across age groups.

OBJECTIVE: Although eating disorders (EDs) occur throughout the lifespan, little research has been conducted with midlife/older adults, particularly those in higher levels of care (HLOC). The current study examined outcomes among 2009 patients with EDs receiving HLOC treatment at a large multisite facility between January 2020 and June 2022, across different age groups (ages <18, 18-25, 26-39 and ≥40). It was hypothesised that patients aged 40+ would exhibit less improvement on measures of ED psychopathology and depression than other age groups. METHOD: Participants completed the eating disorder examination-questionnaire (EDE-Q) and the patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) at admission and discharge. RESULTS: Changes for all outcomes from admission to discharge were statistically significant at p < 0.001 across all age groups. Changes in the EDE-Q Restraint subscale were significantly less in patients ages 26-39 than in patients ages 18-25 (p < 0.01). Changes in PHQ-9 were significantly greater in patients ages 40+ than patients ages 18-25 (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to hypotheses, patients ages 40+ did not show worse outcomes than younger patients, and showed greater improvements in depression than young adults. The therapeutic needs of midlife/older adults with EDs may be favourably met by a HLOC regimen as described in this study.

Defining levels of care in cardiogenic shock.

Background: Expert opinion and professional society statements have called for multi-tier care systems for the management of cardiogenic shock (CS). However, little is known about how to pragmatically define centers with different levels of care (LOC) for CS. Methods: Eleven of 23 hospitals within our healthcare system sharing a common electronic health record were classified as different LOC according to their highest mechanical circulatory support (MCS) capabilities: Level 1 (L-1)-durable left ventricular assist device, Level 1A (L-1A)-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, Level 2 (L-2)-intra-aortic balloon pump and percutaneous ventricular assist device; and Level 3 (L-3)-no MCS. All adult patients treated for CS (International Classification of Diseases, ICD-10 code R57.0) between 2016 and 2022 were included. Etiologies of CS were identified using associated diagnostic codes. Management strategies and outcomes across LOC were compared. Results: Higher LOC centers had higher volumes: L-1 (n = 1): 2,831 patients, L-1A (n = 4): 3,452, L-2 (n = 1): 340, and L-3 (n = 5): 780. Emergency room admissions were more common in lower LOC (96% at L-3 vs. 46% L-1; p < 0.001), while hospital transfers were predominant at higher LOC (40% at L-1 vs. 2.7% at L-3; p < 0.001). Men comprised 61% of the cohort. Patients were younger in the higher LOC [69 (60-78) years at L-1 vs. 77 (67-85) years at L-3; p < 0.001]. Patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI)-CS and acute heart failure (AHF)-CS were concentrated in higher LOC centers while other etiologies of CS were more common in L-2 and L-3 (p < 0.001). Cardiac arrest on admission was more prevalent in lower LOC centers (L-1: 2.8% vs. L-3: 12.1%; p < 0.001). Patients with AMI-CS received more percutaneous coronary intervention in lower LOC (51% L-2 vs. 29% L-1; p < 0.01) but more coronary arterial bypass graft surgery at higher LOC (L-1: 42% vs. L-1A: 23%; p < 0.001). MCS use was consistent across levels for AMI-CS but was more frequent in higher LOC for AHF-CS patients (L-1: 28% vs. L-2: 10%; p < 0.001). Despite increasing in-hospital mortality with decreasing LOC, no significant difference was seen after multivariable adjustment. Conclusion: This is the first report describing a pragmatic classification of LOC for CS which, based on MCS capabilities, can discriminate between centers with distinct demographics, practice patterns, and outcomes. This classification may serve as the basis for future research and the creation of CS systems of care.

Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire: Norms for Adults in Higher Levels of Care.

Establishing normative data for questionnaires is essential for the accurate interpretation of scores, given that these norms can vary according to different subpopulations and treatment contexts. The purpose of this study was to establish norms for the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q) among adults receiving higher levels of care (HLOCs) for the treatment of eating disorders. Participants were 2,283 people receiving treatment at the inpatient, residential, partial hospitalization, or intensive outpatient levels of care. The EDE-Q was completed at admission. Patients with anorexia nervosa-restricting subtype (AN-R) had the lowest EDE-Q Global scores when compared with all other eating disorder diagnoses. When compared with intensive outpatient care, only those in residential treatment had higher EDE-Q Global scores. This study is among the first to describe norms for the EDE-Q in a large sample of adults receiving various HLOCs. Programs utilizing the EDE-Q to assess treatment outcomes can use these findings to aid people in interpreting their scores.

Medicina física y rehabilitación en pacientes con COVID-19

El sistema de salud se enfrentó a una pandemia mundial provocada por el SARS-CoV-2. Los planes de preparación para emergencias, por lo general, no consideraban cuestiones específicas de rehabilitación para pacientes en sus diferentes niveles de atención, a pesar de que la Organización Mundial de la Salud aconsejó incluir a toda la comunidad médica, además del personal de rehabilitación, lo antes posible. Se realizó una revisión de lo publicado en los últimos cinco años, referenciándose 25 bibliografías. La revisión se hizo con el objetivo de compartir información con la comunidad médica, incluidos profesionales y técnicos dedicados a la rehabilitación, que atendieron pacientes con COVID-19 en los diferentes niveles de atención. Se resumió y analizó la información disponible sobre la COVID-19, basada en una búsqueda de la literatura científica y en la experiencia en el tratamiento de los pacientes con diferentes tipos de discapacidad, para planificar la continuidad asistencial de rehabilitación y orientar las pautas a seguir en las diferentes fases y niveles de atención, aspecto que aún resulta incierto.

The health system faced a global pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2. Emergency preparedness plans generally did not consider specific rehabilitation issues for patients at their different levels for care, although the World Health Organization advised the inclusion of the entire medical community in addition to rehabilitation staff as soon as possible. A review of what was published in the last five years was carried out, referencing 25 bibliographies. The review was made with the objective of sharing information with the medical community, including professionals and technicians dedicated to rehabilitation, who treated patients with COVID-19 at different levels of care. The available information on COVID-19 was summarized and analyzed, based on a search of the scientific literature and on the experience in the treatment of patients with different levels of disabilities, to plan the continuity of the rehabilitation care and to guide the guidelines to follow in the different phases and levels of care, an aspect that is still uncertain.

Analysis of headache management in Andalusia.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Headache is a frequent reason for consultation between primary care physicians, emergency services physicians, and neurology specialists; however, it is not always well managed. The Andalusian Society of Neurology's Headache Study Group (SANCE) aimed to analyse headache management at different levels of care. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a descriptive cross-sectional study with data gathered through a retrospective survey in July 2019. Participants completed a series of structured questionnaires on different social and work-related variables from 4 different groups of healthcare professionals (primary care [PC], emergency departments, neurology departments, headache units). RESULTS: A total of 204 healthcare professionals completed the survey: 35 emergency department physicians, 113 PC physicians, 37 general neurologists, and 19 neurologists specialising in headache. Eighty-five percent of PC physicians reported prescribing preventive drugs, which were maintained for at least 6 months (59%), with flunarizine and amitriptyline being the most commonly used. Most patients attended at neurology consultations (65%) are referred by PC physicians, with changes in the headache pattern being the main reason for referral (74%). Healthcare professionals across all levels of care showed great interest in headache and in receiving training in headache management (97% of PC physicians, 100% of emergency services physicians, 100% of general neurologists). CONCLUSIONS: Migraine sparks great interest among healthcare professionals from different levels of care. Our results also reveal a lack of resources for headache management, which is reflected in the long waiting times. Other means of bilateral communication between different levels of care should be explored (eg, e-mail).

Comparing patient safety culture in primary, secondary and tertiary hospitals in Ghana.

Objective: This study compared patient safety culture among health professionals in tertiary, secondary and primary hospitals. Design: We conducted a cross-sectional survey among thirteen primary, secondary and tertiary hospitals in Ghana. A structured questionnaire was administered to 1,656 health professionals. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and One-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Setting: This study was conducted in the Greater Accra, Bono and Upper East regions, representing the southern, middle and northern ecological zones, respectively. Participants: Health professionals. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was patient safety culture. Results: Five patient safety culture dimensions were rated moderate positive response, while five were rated high positive response. We found a statistically significant difference in patient safety culture across primary, secondary and tertiary hospitals (p < 0.05). For instance, the mean difference between tertiary and secondary hospitals was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Additionally, the mean difference between tertiary and primary hospitals was statistically significant (p < 0.05). There was also a significant difference in the means between secondary and primary hospitals (p < 0.05). Conclusion: This study has demonstrated a variation in patient safety culture across Ghana's tertiary, secondary and primary hospitals. Therefore, healthcare managers and professionals should prioritise patient safety. Funding: This work was supported by the University of Ghana [UGRF/13/MDG-001/2019-2020].

Atención al duelo en los servicios españoles de cuidados paliativos: estudio comparativo con otros países europeos / Bereavement care in spanish palliative care services: a comparative study with other european countries

Objetivo: El objetivo de este trabajo es describir y comparar el tipo y las características de atención al duelo en Europa y España, así como actualizar e identificar avances en España con el fin de mejorar la atención al duelo. Método: Estudio observacional, descriptivo, prospectivo y comparativo. Realizado a partir de los datos del grupo de trabajo de duelo de la EAPC relativos a España, recogidos mediante un cuestionario que consta de 54 preguntas en 6 secciones: antecedentes, apoyo, personal, acceso y niveles de cuidado, aspectos comunitarios, recursos y modelo de atención. Fue distribuido por correo electrónico a través de la EAPC a 56 asociaciones nacionales de CP. Las comparaciones entre Europa y España se realizaron utilizando la prueba de Chi-cuadrado de Pearson. Resultados: La atención al duelo se ofrece en el 83 % de los 314 servicios que responden en Europa y en el 73 % de 56 servicios en España, con datos similares a estudios anteriores españoles. La mayoría de servicios corresponden a unidades hospitalarias. El tipo de soporte o intervención especializada depende del nivel de atención en ambos grupos. En Europa, el 32 % dispone de directrices o guías nacionales de duelo en su país, en España el 61 % de los servicios, lo que facilita la actuación. Los “instrumentos formales de riesgo” son utilizados solo por una cuarta parte de los servicios. Conclusiones: Este estudio presenta un avance y un reto futuro en la atención al duelo en Europa y España. Los datos han mostrado que la atención al duelo no forma parte de todos los servicios. El número de respuestas a los cuestionarios no ha aumentado ni se han incrementado los servicios en España. Tanto en Europa como en España es necesario seguir potenciando, formalizando e incrementando servicios con atención al duelo, como una parte esencial de los cuidados paliativos. (AU)

Objetive: To describe and compare the type and characteristics of bereavement care in Europe and Spain. To update and identify advances in Spain for improving grief care. Method: An observational, descriptive, prospective and comparative study. Made on data from the EAPC bereavement group relating to Spain, collected through a questionnaire consisting of 54 questions in 6 sections: background; support; personal; access, levels of care; community aspects; resources and care model. It was distributed by online mail via the EAPC to 56 national PC associations. Comparisons between Europe and Spain were made using Pearson’s χ2 test. Results: Bereavement care is offered by 83 % of the 314 responding services in Europe and in 73% of 56 services in Spain, with similar data to previous Spanish studies. Most services correspond to hospital units. The type of support or specialized intervention depends on level of care in both groups. In Europe, 27 % have National Grief Guides in their country, in Spain 61 % of services, which facilitates action. “Formal risk instruments” are used by only a quarter of the services. Conclusions: This study presents an advance and a future challenge in bereavement care in Europe and Spain. Data have shown that bereavement care is not included in all services. The numbers of responses to questionnaires have not increased, nor have services in Spain increased. Both in Europe and in Spain, it is necessary to continue promoting, formalizing and increasing services with attention to grief as an essential part of palliative care services. (AU)

Levels of Medical Intervention and End-of-Life Practices in Long-Term Care Centres.

Background: Levels of medical intervention (LMI) are legal documents in which physicians record patient preferences, or those of their designated substitute decision-makers, concerning end-of-life care. Studies suggest that, although LMI are intended to orient clinical practice, their function tends to be limited to logistical aspects of care. How LMI shapes or guides patient-centred, end-of-life care remains unclear. The aim of this study was to examine possible associations between LMI and certain aspects of end-of-life care practices in LTCC, such as nurse-documented patient experiences of pain, and prescription and administration of medication. Methods: A retrospective descriptive study of 100 files retrieved from a clinical database of deceased patients in LTCCs located in an urban integrated health and social service organization in Québec, Canada, was conducted. Results: Significant associations between last documented LMI and frequency of narcotic prescription and administration, at either regular intervals or PRN, are highlighted. The time delay between last LMI assessment and patient death was one week or less for 39.4% of cases. Conclusion: These results suggest that LMI assessment practices may not correspond to their intended use. A short time frame between last LMI (L-LMI) assessment and patient death may suggest less-than-optimal patient comfort in end-of-life care.

Descripción y cuantificación de las intervenciones farmacoterapéuticas al ingreso de los pacientes en un centro sociosanitario / Description and Quantification of Pharmacotherapeutic Interventions at the Admission of Patients in a Nursing Home

Introducción: La atención sociosanitaria es una evaluación multidimensional e interdisciplinar para mejorar la calidad de vida del paciente institucio-nalizado. El objetivo de este estudio fue describir y cuantificar las intervenciones realizadas por un farmacéutico al ingreso de pacientes en un centro sociosanitario (CSS). Método: Estudio unicéntrico y prospectivo de 20 meses de duración realizado en un CSS de 251 camas. Se incluyeron 3 modalidades de atención sociosanitaria (ancianos pernocta, centro terapéu-tico-ocupacional pernocta y gravemente afecta-dos). Los datos se obtuvieron de la historia clínica electrónica y se registraron variables relacionadas con el paciente (fecha nacimiento, sexo, insuficien-cia renal, índice de Charlson, registro de alergias) y con el tratamiento (número de fármacos prescritos al ingreso en el CSS e interacciones, número de fármacos monitorizables farmacocinéticamente, recomendaciones de farmacovigilancia y seguri-dad, problemas relacionados con los medicamen-tos (PRM) detectados y las adaptaciones a guía farmacoterapéutica). Para el análisis estadístico, se utilizó el programa SPSS. Resultados: Se incluyeron 172 ingresos, con una edad media de 78,4 años (DS: 17,7 años) y el 65,1% fueron mujeres. La media de fármacos prescritos por paciente fue de 9,5 (DS: 4,4). En el 51,7% de los pacientes se detectó al menos un PRM, con una media de 3,2 PRM/paciente. En el 64,5% de los in-gresos se realizaron adaptaciones a la guía farma-coterapéutica, con una media de 1,3 adaptaciones/paciente. Conclusiones: El farmacéutico realiza numerosas intervenciones en un CSS, como las adaptaciones a guía y la detección de PRM, resaltando la importan-cia de su presencia y su conciliación entre niveles asistenciales (AU)

Introduction: Social health care is a multidimen-sional and interdisciplinary evaluation to improve the quality of life of the institutionalized patient. The objective of this study was to describe and quantify the interventions carried out by a specialist pharmacist at the time of patients' admission in a nursing home (NH). Method: This is a single-centre and prospective study with a duration of 20 months made in a NH with 251 beds. 3 kinds of social-healthcare were included [old people that stay the night, therapeu-tic-occupational centre (stay the night) and severely affected]. Data were obtained from the electronic clinical records. Furthermore, variables related to the patient (birth date, gender, kidney failure, Char-lson index, allergies record) and to the treatment [number of drugs prescribed on admission in a NH and interactions, number of drugs that could be monitored thanks to the pharmacokinetics, security and pharmacovigilance recommendations, drug related problems (DRPs) detected and adaptations to pharmacotherapy guide] were recorded. The pro-gram SPSS was used for the statistical analysis.Results: 172 admissions were included, with an average age of 78.4 years (SD: 17.7 years). 65.1% of admissions were women. The average of drugs prescribed per patient was 9.5 (SD: 4.4). 51.7% of patients were detected with at least one DRP, with an average of 3.2 DRPs/patient. In 64.5% of admissions, adaptations to the pharmacotherapeu-tic guide were carried out, with an average of 1.3 adaptations/patient. Conclusions: In a NH, the pharmacist performs many interventions, such as adaptations to the guide, detection of DRPs and conciliation between levels of care (AU)

An assessment of baseline risk factors for peripartum maternal critical care interventions.

BACKGROUND: Maternal morbidity presents a growing challenge to the American healthcare system and increasing numbers of patients are requiring higher levels of care in pregnancy. Identifying patients at high risk for critical care interventions, including intensive care unit admission, during delivery hospitalizations may facilitate appropriate multidisciplinary planning and lead to improved maternal safety. Baseline risk factors for critical care in pregnancy have not been well-described previously. OBJECTIVE: This study assesses baseline factors associated with critical care interventions that were present at admission for delivery. STUDY DESIGN: This is a secondary analysis of a multicenter observational registry of pregnancy after prior uterine surgery and primary cesarean delivery. All women with known gestational age were included. The primary outcome measure was a composite of critical care interventions that included postpartum intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, central intravenous access, and arterial line placement. Risk for this critical care outcome measure was compared by selected baseline and obstetric characteristics known at the time of hospital admission, including maternal age, pre-pregnancy BMI, race, maternal co-morbidities, parity, and plurality. We evaluated these potential predictors and fit a multivariable logistic regression model to ascertain the most significant risk factors for critical care during a delivery hospitalization. RESULTS: 73,096 of 73,257 women in the parent trial met inclusion criteria, of whom 505 underwent a critical care intervention (0.7%). In the adjusted model, heart disease [aOR = 10.05, CI = 6.97 - 14.49], renal disease [aOR = 2.78, CI = 1.49 - 5.18], and connective tissue disease [aOR = 3.27, CI = 1.52 - 6.99], as well as hypertensive disorders of pregnancy [aOR = 2.04, CI = 1.31 - 3.17] were associated with the greatest odds of critical care intervention [p < .01] (Table 2). Other predictors associated with increased risk included maternal age, African American race, smoking, diabetes, asthma, anemia, nulliparity, and twin pregnancy. CONCLUSION: In this cohort, women with cardiac disease, renal disease, connective tissue disease and preeclampsia spectrum disorders were at increased risk for critical care interventions. Obstetric providers should assess patient risk routinely, ensure appropriate maternal level of care, and create multidisciplinary plans to improve maternal safety and reduce risk.

Racial Disparities in Maternal Critical Care: Are There Racial Differences in Level of Care?

BACKGROUND: Obstetric care in the US is complicated by marked racial and ethnic disparities in maternal obstetric outcomes, including severe morbidity and mortality, which are not explained by underlying differences in patient characteristics. Understanding differences in care delivery related to clinical acuity across different racial groups may help elucidate the source of these disparities. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the association of maternal race with utilization of critical care interventions. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study conducted as a secondary analysis of a large, multicenter observational study of women undergoing cesarean delivery. All women with a known delivery date were included. The primary outcome measure, a composite of critical care interventions (CCI) at delivery or postpartum that included mechanical ventilation, central and arterial line placement, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission were compared by racial/ethnic group-non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic, Asian, and Native American. We evaluated differences in utilization of critical care with a multivariable regression model accounting for selected characteristics present at admission for delivery, including maternal age, BMI, co-morbidities, parity, and plurality. Maternal mortality was also evaluated as a secondary outcome and the frequency of CCI by significant maternal co-morbidity, specifically heart disease, renal disease, and chronic hypertension was assessed to ascertain the level of care provided to women of different race/ethnicity with specific baseline co-morbidities. RESULTS: 73,096 of 73,257 women in the parent trial met inclusion criteria, of whom 505 (0.7%) received a CCI and 3337 (4.6%) had a significant medical co-morbidity (1.2% heart disease, 0.8% renal disease, 2.5% chronic hypertension). The mortality rate was significantly higher among non-Hispanic black women, compared to non-Hispanic white and Hispanic women. In the adjusted model, there was no significant association between CCI and race/ethnicity. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that differences in maternal morbidity by race may be accounted for by differential escalation to higher intensity care. Further investigation into processes for care intensification may continue to clarify sources of racial and ethnic disparities in maternal morbidity and potential for improvement.

Implementing a Standardized Care Pathway Integrating Oncology, Palliative Care and Community Care in a Rural Region of Mid-Norway.

INTRODUCTION: To improve quality across levels of care, we developed a standardized care pathway (SCP) integrating palliative and oncology services for hospitalized and home-dwelling palliative cancer patients in a rural region. METHODS: A multifaceted implementation strategy was directed towards a combination of target groups. The implementation was conducted on a system level, and implementation-related activities were registered prospectively. Adult patients with advanced cancer treated with non-curative intent were included and interviewed. Healthcare leaders (HCLs) and healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved in the development of the SCP or exposed to the implementation strategy were interviewed. In addition, HCLs and HCPs exposed to the implementation strategy answered standardized questionnaires. Hospital admissions were registered prospectively. RESULTS: To assess the use of the SCP, 129 cancer patients were included. Fifteen patients were interviewed about their experiences with the patient-held record (PHR). Sixty interviews were performed among 1320 HCPs exposed to the implementation strategy. Two hundred and eighty-seven HCPs reported on their training in and use of the SCP. Despite organizational cultural differences, developing an SCP integrating palliative and oncology services across levels of care was feasible. Both HCLs and HCPs reported improved quality of care in the wake of the implementation process. Two and a half years after the implementation was launched, 28% of the HCPs used the SCP and 41% had received training in its use. Patients reported limited use and benefit of the PHR. CONCLUSION: An SCP may be a usable tool for integrating palliative and oncology services across care levels in a rural region. An extensive implementation process resulted in improvements of process outcomes, yet still limited use of the SCP in clinical practice. HCLs and HCPs reported improved quality of cancer care following the implementation process. Future research should address mandatory elements for usefulness and successful implementation of SCPs for palliative cancer patients.

When a patient has incurable cancer, it is beneficial to introduce palliative care early in the disease trajectory along with anti-cancer treatment. A standardized care pathway is a method to improve quality and reduce variation in healthcare. It can promote integrated healthcare services in palliative care, e.g. by specifying action points when the patient's situation is changing. In this study, a standardized care pathway for cancer patients with palliative care needs was developed in a rural region of Norway. The pathway focused on patients' needs and symptoms and on smooth transition between levels of care. An educational program and an information strategy were developed to ensure implementation. To evaluate the implementation, all activity regarding the implementation process was registered. Cancer patients and healthcare professionals were interviewed and answered questionnaires. One thousand three hundred and twenty healthcare professionals were exposed to the implementation strategy. One hundred and twenty-nine cancer patients were followed up according to the standardized care pathway. Despite different perspectives of care, it was feasible to develop a standardized care pathway for palliative cancer patients across care settings. A paper-based patient-held record was only found to be useful by a limited number of patients. An extensive implementation process was completed and resulted in improvements regarding healthcare professionals' experience with the quality of cancer care in the region, but limited use of the care pathway in clinical practice. Further research should identify the most important elements for usefulness and successful implementation of the care pathway.

The Term Newborn: Delivery Room Triage and Transitions of Care.

Term newborn infants without significant medical problems usually transition from fetal to newborn life without medical assistance. Infants requiring therapy often need care in a neonatal intensive care unit as opposed to a well-baby unit. Infants with unclear physiologic status or disease that may require therapies in the immediate newborn period may benefit from a period of observation with close monitoring before admission to a well-baby unit. Whenever possible, providing care for a newborn infant in an area that provides care for the newborn and mother together in the same room facilitates adaptation to normal breastfeeding and family bonding.

Women of diverse sexual identities admit to eating disorder treatment with differential symptom severity but achieve similar clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Sexual minority (SM) women may be at increased risk for certain eating disorder (ED) symptoms and report distinct body image concerns compared to heterosexual women. However, it is unclear how such symptoms differ across sexual orientations in treatment-seeking women, or if there are differences in treatment outcomes. This study examined group differences in (1) ED symptomatology at admission in a disaggregated sample of SM and heterosexual women presenting for ED treatment and (2) treatment outcomes. METHODS: Adult women who admitted to higher levels of ED treatment across 48 locations of one treatment center between 2015 and 2018 completed self-report measures of ED symptomatology and quality of life (QOL) at admission and discharge. Participants identified their sexualities as heterosexual (n = 2,502, 80.2%), lesbian/gay (n = 134, 4.3%), bisexual (n = 270, 8.7%), "other" (n = 136, 4.4%), and unsure (n = 78, 2.5%). Objectives 1 and 2 were tested using one-way and repeated measures analyses of variance, respectively. RESULTS: Group differences at admission emerged between lesbian/gay and heterosexual, bisexual and heterosexual, and bisexual and "other"-identified women on preoccupation and restriction, fasting, self-induced vomiting, shape and weight concern, and QOL. Bisexual women, in particular, admitted with the highest severity and at younger ages compared to heterosexual women. Despite such differences, women across groups achieved similar treatment outcomes at discharge. DISCUSSION: Study findings underscore the importance of subgroup analyses of ED symptoms in SM women and have both clinical and research implications related to ED symptomatology in this population.

Family members' reflections upon a family-based inpatient treatment program for adolescent anorexia nervosa: a thematic analysis.

BACKGROUND: Family-based outpatient treatment is usually recommended as the treatment of choice when a child develops anorexia nervosa. However, some young persons will inevitably require higher levels of care. Qualitative research on family perspectives may help inform strategies to adapt family-based practices into intensified treatment settings. Our overarching aim was to investigate family members' perspectives following a family-based inpatient treatment program for adolescent anorexia nervosa and to discuss clinical implications for treatment providers. METHODS: A subsample of eight families taking part in a naturalistic outcome study at a specialized eating disorder unit participated in the study (8 patients, 14 parents, and 10 siblings). The thematic analyses were inductive, predominantly descriptive, and guided by a multi-perspective framework. RESULTS: Five main themes were identified: 1: Expectations and evaluation of needs. Entering treatment from different vantage points, 2: Interactions with peers during the admission as highly beneficial or problematic, 3: Perspectives on staff expertise and the eating disorder unit's structure, 4: Influencing within family relationships in different ways, and 5: Being admitted is at best only half the job: reflections on leaving the eating disorder unit. CONCLUSIONS: Our study offers insight into how former inpatients and their family members experienced an inpatient treatment program designed to align treatment with the central elements of an outpatient family-based treatment approach for adolescent anorexia nervosa. Overall, the findings support emerging research underlining the necessity of strengthening the family-based treatment approach within intensified treatment settings. Moreover, the results emphasized the need for more knowledge on how to optimize inpatient treatment as well as the importance of providing smooth transitions between care settings.