Comparative effects of different treatments based on the levonorgestrel intrauterine system in endometrial carcinoma and endometrial hyperplasia patients: a network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) has been widely used in patients with endometrial carcinoma (EC), endometrial hyperplasia without atypical (EH), and atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH). The purpose of our Network meta-analysis (NMA) is to evaluate the efficacy of the treatments based on the LNG-IUS in patients with EC and EH with or without atypical. METHODS: We examined PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library up to 22 April 2024 to determine studies reporting treatment outcomes in EC and EH patients receiving LNG-IUS therapy, LNG-IUS + metformin (MET), oral progestins (OP), etc. We used EndNote 9 to select studies, Jadad scale and NOS scale to assess quality, stata(16.0) and R (4.3.1) to analysis the data. RESULTS: Overall, 28 studies involving 3752 patients were included in our NMA. As for EH patients, LNG-IUS (RR 1.21; 95% CrI [1.11, 1.34]) and LNG-IUS + MET (RR 323.57; 95% CrI [1.61, 214,223,188.1])] significantly increased CR rate in comparison with OP. Based on SUCRA, LNG-IUS + OP was the best treatment to improve CR(SUCRA = 67.2%) in patients with EC, whereas LNG-IUS + MET was superior in increasing CR (SUCRA = 99.8%) than any other treatments for EH patients. Besides, the ranking based on SUCRA illustrated that LNG-IUS alone was the best choice to raise CR rates (SUCRA = 76.7%) for AEH patients. In head-to-head meta-analysis, OP has a higher progression rate (RR 4, 95% CI 1.89-8.46, p = 0.062; I2 = 71.3%), a higher nausea rate (RR 1.93, 95% CI 1.24-3.01, p = 0.187; I2 = 40.4%) than LNG-IUS in patients with EH. In contrast, LNG-IUS had a irregular vaginal bleeding rates (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.64-0.90, p = 0.034; I2 = 77.7%) than OP in EH patients. In addition, as for AEH patients, OP has a higher persistence rate (RR 4.31, 95% CI 1.43-13.00, p = 0.93; I2 = 0.0%) than LNG-IUS. CONCLUSION: According to the NMA, LNG-IUS related studies are feasible for conservative therapy in patients with EC and EH with or without atypical. Therefore, concerning the curative effect, we recommend LNG-IUS-based treatments as the best conservative therapy for EC and EH patients. However, future studies require large sample sizes and more outcomes to further evaluate the differences of treatment selections based on LNG-IUS.

Usage of the levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system in perimenopause.

Levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system have excellent contraceptive efficacy with simultaneous lowering of menstruation's blood loss. It could be used for therapy of endometrial hyperplasia in perimenopause. In position of gestagen part of the hormone replacement therapy it has high control of endometrial proliferation. It is conjoined with the zero increasing of risk of thromboembolic disease in combination with transdermal oestrogen's application.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) 52 mg versus other long-acting reversible contraceptives for contraception in Spain.

INTRODUCTION: Condoms and combined oral contraceptive pills are widely used in Spain with high failure rates. Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive (LARC) methods offer better efficacy and adherence and reduce unintended pregnancies (UP) compared with short-acting reversible contraceptive (SARC) methods. OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of LNG-IUS 52 mg (Mirena®) versus other LARC for contraception in Spain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Markov model with annual cycles and an eight-year time horizon was developed from the Spanish national healthcare system (NHS) perspective, considering costs for contraceptive method acquisition, health care resources (HCR) and UP. Effectiveness was based on failure and discontinuation rates. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the model's robustness. RESULTS: LNG-IUS 52 mg (Mirena®) resulted in lower costs and fewer UP versus LNG-IUS 13.5 mg (Jaydess®), Implant (Implanon®) and Copper IUD. LNG-IUS 52 mg (Levosert®) prevented the same UP events at a higher cost. LNG-IUS 19.5 mg (Kyleena®) was the most effective option, due to a lower discontinuation rate. CONCLUSIONS: LNG-IUS 52 mg (Mirena®) is the least costly LARC, driven by lower acquisition costs and reduced HCR utilisation. Increasing LNG-IUS 52 mg (Mirena®) uptake in contraception could generate further cost savings for the Spanish NHS and reduce economic burden of UP.

Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS; Mirena^®) is an effective and cost-saving long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) method compared with other similar methods in Spain over an eight-year time horizon, and Kyleena^® was the most effective option.

Maximizing the effectiveness of 1.5 mg levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: The case for precoital use.

Objectives: U.S. and World Health Organization Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use state people may have an advanced supply of emergency contraception (EC) to minimize treatment delays. We sought to characterize the potential improvement in effectiveness of 1.5 mg levonorgestrel (LNG-EC) if it were taken up to a few hours before unprotected sex. Study design: We expanded on an existing mathematical model for the maximum attainable effectiveness of LNG-EC, assuming it exclusively works to disrupt ovulation, and compared results with point estimates from nine studies when it was taken up to 72 hours after sex. We then modelled how effectiveness might have improved if subjects had taken LNG-EC up to 3 hours before sex. Results: Taking LNG-EC immediately after sex could potentially reduce the risk of unintended pregnancy by 91%. However, population-average maximum attainable effectiveness levels ranged from just 49% to 67% when accounting for the distributions of postcoital treatment delays in the example studies. If half the subjects had taken it 3 hours before sex, then maximum effectiveness levels would have ranged from 70% to 81%. Conclusions: At the individual level, taking LNG-EC a few hours before sex is a logical extension of Selected Practice Recommendations regarding an advanced supply of EC and, based on our modeling, should be advocated for people who can reasonably anticipate an unprotected sex act. In the absence of more clinical data, however, people should not routinely rely on precoital use of LNG-EC to prevent pregnancy unless modern, effective contraceptives are inaccessible to them. Implications: Based on mathematical modeling, individuals who anticipate needing to take LNG-EC for an impending unprotected act of sex could further reduce their chance of an undesired pregnancy by taking it a few hours in advance.

Hormone-related side effects in new users of a levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine device.

BACKGROUND: Although the levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine device is locally active and has low systemic hormone exposure, hormonal intrauterine device users sometimes report hormone-related side effects. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate hormone-related adverse event rates among all participants and compare these among those who used combined hormonal or no hormonal contraception in the month before enrollment. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 1714 women aged 16-45 years old received a levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine device in a multicenter phase 3 trial to evaluate contraceptive efficacy and safety for up to 10 years. This analysis evaluated a subset of participants who used combined hormonal or no hormonal contraception in the month prior to device placement. We assessed all non-expulsion, non-bleeding-related events with ≥1% incidence at 180 days with a plan to include weight increase regardless of incidence; we excluded events considered non-hormonal. We computed 180-day side effect frequency rates based on the number of days a side effect was reported during the study period. We created a multivariable model for side effect incidence at 180 days based on age, race, ethnicity, body mass index at enrollment, parity, and contraception use in the month before enrollment. For those side effects with a p-value <0.2 on univariate comparison between combined-hormonal and no-hormonal contraception users, we secondarily evaluated 360-day event rates. RESULTS: Overall, 644 participants used combined hormonal contraception (primarily oral [n=499, 77.5%]) and 855 used no hormonal method before IUD placement. Individual side effect rates over the first 180 days did not differ between prior combined-hormonal and no-hormonal contraception users except for acne (84 [13.0%] versus 73 [8.5%], respectively), p=0.006, OR 1.61 (95% CI 1.15-2.24). However, this association was weaker after adjustment for age, race, ethnicity, obesity status, and parity (aOR 1.40, 95% CI 0.99-1.98) At 360 days, prior combined hormonal contraception users were more likely to report acne (101 [15.7%] vs. 91 [10.6%], respectively, p=0.005) and orgasm/libido problems (20 [3.1%] vs. 12 [1.4%], respectively, p=0.03). Over the first 180 days, all side effects other than acne were reported in less than 3% of days; acne was reported an average of 13 days (7.4%) per prior combined hormonal contraception user and 9 days (5.0%) per prior non-hormonal contraception user (p<0.0001). Discontinuation for evaluated side effects occurred in 83 (5.5%) participants with no difference between those who used combined hormonal (36 [5.6%]) or no hormonal contraception (47 [5.5%]), p=1.0) before study entry. CONCLUSIONS: Using combined hormonal contraception prior to levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine device placement is only weakly associated with reporting hormonally related side effects like acne. Only a small percentage of levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine device users experienced potentially hormone-related side effects during the initial 6 months of use that resulted in discontinuation.

Impact of manufacturing variables on product performance of contraceptive levonorgestrel intrauterine systems.

The development of Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Systems (LNG-IUSs) stands as a formidable challenge due to their intricate design and reliance on specialized manufacturing methods. Pharmaceutical manufacturers face a labyrinth of process variables that demand precise identification and comprehension to establish a robust product design to ensure consistent performance. The current manuscript navigates through this complexity, describing a small-scale processing method for LNG-IUSs via addition and condensation curing processes, as well as investigating the influence of key manufacturing variables on LNG-IUS product performance. Different mixing speeds and time exhibited distinct impact on drug content uniformity within the IUS drug-polymer reservoirs. Surprisingly, no variation in drug release rates were observed. Curing temperature and time were the critical processing parameters of IUSs which were dependent on the polymer type (polydimethylsiloxane, PDMS) and drug loading. At lower curing temperatures, crosslinking in PDMS remained relatively unaffected, irrespective of drug loading. By contrast, elevating curing temperatures resulted in a drastic reduction in PDMS crosslinking densities at higher drug loading. This was attributed to increased drug volume fraction within the matrix, impeding optimal prepolymer chain mobility and rearrangement which is crucial for complete crosslinking. Interestingly, rapid curing led to increased PDMS crystallinity, thereby retarding drug release rates while concurrently compromising mechanical properties. PDMS curing chemistry, such as condensation cure (no filler) and addition cure (cured at room temperature), did not affect drug release rates of the LNG-IUSs. In the condensation cure-based LNG-IUS, the formulations prepared without filler had higher drug release rates than those containing silica or diatomaceous earth fillers. Overall, the present study unravels the intricate interplay between PDMS characteristics, processing variables, and product performance, offering fundamental insights into product design and manufacturing of brand and generic LNG-IUS products.

Efficacy of hysteroscopic levonorgestrel­releasing intrauterine device fixation in the treatment of adenomyosis: A cohort study.

The present study aimed to investigate the efficacy of hysteroscopic levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) fixation surgery in the treatment of adenomyosis through a cohort study. The cohort study was performed at the Affiliated Jinhua Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (Jinhua, China). A total of 31 women with adenomyosis were initially recruited from June 2020 to June 2022 and divided into an experimental group and a control group. The experimental group underwent hysteroscopic LNG-IUD fixation surgery and the control group underwent conventional implantation of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. The assessed efficacy outcomes included the time of LNG-IUD expulsion, postoperative vaginal bleeding time, dysmenorrhea, and the menstrual blood loss score (MBLS). A total of 31 participants completed the research. The LNG-IUD expulsion rate was 6.25 and 60% (P<0.05) in the experimental and control group, respectively. The LNG-IUD in place time was 20.50 months (Q1, 15.75; Q3, 24.00) in the experimental group and 10.00 months (Q1, 6.50; Q3, 15.00) in the control group (P<0.05); the time of vaginal bleeding after surgery in the experimental and control groups were 12.50 days (9.25, 16.25) and 120.00 days (75.00, 120.00), respectively (P<0.05). Multiple-factor Cox regression analysis revealed that the LNG-IUD expulsion in patients with adenomyosis is associated with the hysteroscopic LNG-IUD fixation surgery [hazard ratio (HR), 1954.09], uterine cavity depth (HR, 16.63), MBLS (HR, 1.14), history of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment in the previous 6 months (HR, 2.10), history of vaginal delivery (HR, 1.79) and history of cervical laceration (HR, 3.69). In conclusion, hysteroscopic LNG-IUD fixation reduces the rate of LNG-IUD expulsion, prolongs the time of LNG-IUD in the uterine cavity, reduces the time of postoperative vaginal bleeding, relieves the symptoms of dysmenorrhea and reduces the menstrual volume in the patients with adenomyosis. The present trial was retrospectively registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on 28th December 2023 (registration no. ChiCTR2300079233).

Emergency contraception - A narrative review of literature.

BACKGROUND: Emergency contraception includes several methods of contraception that can be used after unprotected sexual intercourse, after failure of any used method of contraception or in case of sexual abuse, to prevent pregnancy. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The aim of the study was to analyze the available methods of emergency contraception, their mechanisms of action, efficacy, forms of administration, clinical applications and possible adverse effects. MATERIAL AND METHOD: PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane datebases were searched for articles from 2010 to 2024 about emergency contraception. RESULTS: The analyzed types of emergency contraception included single oral dose of ulipristal acetate, single oral dose of levonorgestrel and intrauterine system releasing levonorgestrel or copper intrauterine device. Taking emergency contraception in the optimum time according to the drug characteristics allows for avoiding pregnancy in more than 90% of cases (depending on the type of emergency contraception and time from unprotected intercourse). The analyzed literature shows that intrauterine copper intrauterine device is the most effective method of emergency contraception, also together with intrauterine system releasing levonorgestrel leading to the lowest rate of adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Taking emergency contraception can result in various adverse effects, therefore it should be introduced after thorough analysis of woman's medical history, including gynecological and obstetric history and potential contraindications. Additionally, the patient should receive detailed information about the drug mechanism of efficacy and potential adverse effects.

Moderate associations between the use of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device and metabolomics profile.

CONTEXT: Use of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) has become common irrespective of age and parity. To date, only a few studies have examined its possible metabolic changes and large-scale biomarker profiles in detail and in a longitudinal design. OBJECTIVE: To apply the metabolomics technique to examine the metabolic profile associated with the use of LNG-IUD both in a cross-sectional and in a longitudinal design. DESIGN: The study consists of cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses of a population-based survey (Health 2000) and its 11-year follow-up (Health 2011). All participants aged 18-49 years with available information on hormonal contraceptive use and metabolomics data (n=1767) were included. Altogether 212 metabolic measures in LNG-IUD users (n=341) were compared to those in non-users of hormonal contraception (n=1426) via multivariable linear regression models. Participants with complete longitudinal information (n=240) were divided into continuers, stoppers, starters, and never-user groups, and 11-year changes in levels of each metabolite were compared. RESULTS: After adjustment for covariates, levels of 102 metabolites differed in LNG-IUD current users compared to non-users of hormonal contraception (median difference in biomarker concentration: -0.12 SD): lower levels of fatty acids concentrations and ratios, cholesterol, triglycerides and other lipids, as well as particle concentration, cholesterol, total lipids and phospholipids in lipoproteins. The 11-year metabolic changes did not differ in relation to changes in LNG-IUD use. CONCLUSIONS: The use of LNG-IUD was associated with several moderate metabolic changes, mostly suggestive of a reduced arterial cardiometabolic risk. Changes in LNG-IUD use were not related to long-term metabolic changes.

Association of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device with gynecologic and breast cancers: a national cohort study in Sweden.

BACKGROUND: The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) is widely used for the treatment of menorrhagia, dysmenorrhea, and for contraception. However, the association between the use of LNG-IUD and the risk of site-specific gynecologic and breast cancers remains inconclusive. OBJECTIVE: We aim to address this knowledge gap by investigating whether the use of LNG-IUD is associated with a significant risk of site-specific gynecologic and breast cancers. This will be achieved by accessing the nationwide Swedish Registers, with consideration given to the influence and potential interaction of family history of cancer. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 514,719 women aged 18 to 50 years who have used LNG-IUD between July 2005 and December 2018 were identified from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register and randomly matched with 1,544,157 comparisons who did not use LNG-IUD at a ratio of 1:3. The propensity score was calculated and matched among women who used LNG-IUD and the matched comparisons. The follow-up period started from the date of the first prescription of LNG-IUD for users as well as for their matched comparisons and ended at the date of diagnosis of gynecologic and breast cancers, date of death from any cause, and the end of the study period, whichever came first. The Cox proportional hazard model with a competing risk analysis was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Additive interaction was calculated as the relative excess risk for interaction, while multiplicative interaction was calculated by including a product term in the regression model. RESULTS: The use of LNG-IUD was associated with a 13% higher risk of breast cancer (adjusted HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.10-1.17), a 33% lower risk of endometrial cancer (adjusted HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.56-0.80), a 14% lower risk of ovarian cancer (adjusted HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75-0.99), and a 9% reduced risk of cervical cancer (adjusted HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.84-0.99) compared to women who did not use LNG-IUD. A significant additive interaction between LNG-IUD use and family history of cancer was observed in breast cancer, indicating a relative 19% excess risk for interaction (P<.002), and 1.63 additional cases per 10,000 person-years. CONCLUSION: The risk of gynecologic and breast cancers exhibits a site-specific effect among LNG-IUD users. It is important to note that the observed effect is small for breast cancer and the results are limited by the observational study design. Clinical recommendations regarding the use of LNG-IUD should carefully weigh its potential benefits and risks. Close monitoring is advisable for the potential development of breast cancer, particularly among women with a family history of breast cancer.

Risk of Stroke in Women Using Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine Device for Contraception.

BACKGROUND: The commonly used combined hormonal contraceptives with progestins and ethinylestradiol are associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke (IS). Progestin-only preparations, including levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices (LG-IUDs), are not associated with an increased risk, and in smaller studies, the risk is even reduced. The risk of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) has never been investigated. We studied the risk of IS and ICH in women using LG-IUDs compared with women not using hormonal contraceptives. METHODS: In this Danish historical cohort study (2004-2021), we followed nonpregnant women (18-49 years) registering incident IS and ICH in relation to use of LG-IUDs/nonuse of hormonal contraceptives utilizing Danish high-quality registries with nationwide coverage. Poisson regression models adjusting for age, ethnicity, education, calendar year, and medication use for risk factors were applied. RESULTS: A total of 1 681 611 nonpregnant women contributed 11 971 745 person-years (py) of observation. Mean age at inclusion was 30.0 years; mean length of follow-up was 7.1 years; 2916 women (24.4 per 100 000 py) had IS; 367 (3.1 per 100 000 py) had ICH. Of these, 364 784 were users of LG-IUD contributing 1 720 311 py to the investigation; mean age at start of usage was 34.6 years. Nonusers of hormonal contraceptives contributed 10 251 434 py; mean age at inclusion was 30.0 years. The incidence rate of IS/ICH among LG-IUD users was 19.2/3.0 and among nonusers, it was 25.2/3.1 per 100 000 py. After adjustment, incidence rate ratio for IS was 0.78 (CI, 0.70-0.88), and for ICH it was 0.94 (CI, 0.69-1.28). CONCLUSIONS: The use of LG-IUD was associated with a 22% lower incidence rate of IS without raising the incidence rate of ICH. The finding raises the question of whether levonorgestrel, in addition to its contraceptive properties, could have the potential to prevent IS.

Accessibility of oral emergency contraceptives in Australian community pharmacies.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the availability of over-the-counter emergency contraceptive pills in the Australian community pharmacy setting. STUDY DESIGN: Representative national telephone survey. RESULTS: Only 70% of the 233 pharmacies surveyed stocked ulipristal acetate (UPA) emergency contraceptive pills, compared to levonorgestrel, which was stocked in 98%. When ulipristal acetate was stocked, it was on average $13 more expensive. CONCLUSIONS: Despite being recommended as the first-line oral emergency contraceptive, UPA is less likely to be available, and when available, it is likely to be more expensive. These findings support anecdotal reports UPA is challenging to access and less commonly used. IMPLICATIONS: Strategies are urgently required to improve equitable access to all methods of oral emergency contraception within the Australian community pharmacy setting and ensure pharmacists are aware of key differences between the available methods. This will ensure that they are prepared to facilitate shared decision making based on the individual needs of each woman.

Trends in Utilization of Emergency Contraceptives in Tanzania: A Retrospective Longitudinal Study From 2018 to 2023.

Introduction Emergency contraceptives (ECs) are a critical method for preventing unwanted pregnancies following unprotected sexual intercourse. However, Tanzania is experiencing an alarming surge in the misuse of ECs among reproductive-aged females, particularly younger girls and women. Reports of their use as regular contraceptives are a rising concern. Deviations from their intended use in emergencies may not only increase the risk of contraceptive failure but also increase the risk of adverse health events. This study aims to delineate and evaluate the utilization patterns of ECs over six consecutive years using importation data obtained from the Tanzania Medicines and Medical Devices Authority (TMDA). Materials and methods We analyzed the EC data collected by TMDA over six consecutive years using a retrospective longitudinal design. Microsoft Power BI (Microsoft® Corp., Redmond, WA) was used to clean, organize, and aggregate the data. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26 (Released 2019; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States) was used to analyze annual trend utilization using linear regression. Results We analyzed 114 importation consignments for ECs, identifying 95.6% (109 records) as oral ECs and 4.4% (five records) as intrauterine devices (IUDs) between 2018 and 2023. This data revealed a significant increase in the volume of EC imports, with its contribution increasing from 1.9% in 2018 to 60.1% in 2023. This highlights the marked increase in EC consumption in Tanzania. In 2023, the defined daily dose per 1000 inhabitants per year (DID) peaked at 3.917826, indicating an unprecedented increase of 4,983.06% compared to the lowest DID observed in 2019 at 0.0873552. The year 2023 alone accounted for 41.63% of the total DID (9.43) over the entire study period. In 2019 and 2020, there was a decrease in EC consumption, followed by a rapid increase from 2021 to 2023. The reduction in EC consumption from 2019 to 2020 was 36.9% compared to that between 2021 and 2022. Conclusions The significant rise in EC importation and utilization in Tanzania between 2018 and 2023, marked by fluctuating consumption trends and a notable surge, highlights the urgent need for targeted educational and policy intervention. This will guide the rational and informed use of ECs, ensuring access aligns with best practices for reproductive health.

Tailoring drug release from long-acting contraceptive levonorgestrel intrauterine systems.

The wide array of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) variants available on the market, coupled with the intricate combination of additives in silicone polymers, and the incomplete understanding of drug release behavior make formulation development of levonorgestrel intrauterine systems (LNG-IUSs) formidable. Accordingly, the objectives of this work were to investigate the impact of excipients on formulation attributes and in vitro performance of LNG-IUSs, elucidate drug release mechanisms, and thereby improve product understanding. LNG-IUSs with a wide range of additives and fillers were prepared, and in vitro drug release testing was conducted for up to 12 months. Incorporating various additives and/or fillers (silica, silicone resins, silicone oil, PEG, etc.) altered the crystallization kinetics of the crosslinked polymer, the viscosity, and the microstructure. In addition, drug-excipient interactions can occur. Interestingly, additives which increased matrix hydrophobicity and hindered PDMS crystallization facilitated dissolution and permeation of the lipophilic LNG. The influence of additives and lubricants on the mechanical properties of LNG-IUSs were also evaluated. PDMS chemical substitution and molecular weight were deemed to be most critical polymer attributes to the in vitro performance of LNG-IUSs. Drugs with varying physicochemical characteristics were used to prepare IUSs, modeling of the release kinetics was performed, and correlations between release properties and the various physicochemical attributes of the model drugs were established. Strong correlations between first order release rate constants and both drug solubility and Log P underpin the partition and diffusion-based release mechanisms in LNG-IUSs. This is the first comprehensive report to provide a mechanistic understanding of material-property-performance relationships for IUSs. This work offers an evidence-based approach to rational excipient selection and tailoring of drug release to achieve target daily release rates in vivo. The novel insights gained through this research could be helpful for supporting development of brand and generic IUS products as well as their regulatory assessment.

Efficacy of etonogestrel subcutaneous implants versus the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in the conservative treatment of adenomyosis.

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of etonogestrel subcutaneous implant (ENG-SCI) with that of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUD) for adenomyosis treatment. A prospective randomized cohort study was conducted including 108 patients (50 patients in ENG-SCI group and 58 in the LNG-IUD group) with adenomyosis from January 2019 to July 2021. After 3 months of treatment, both ENG-SCI group and LNG-IUD group showed significant improvement in patients' visual analog scale, pictorial blood loss assessment chart (PBAC), and uterine volume (P ＜ 0.05). The uterine volume of patients in LNG-IUD group decreased more significantly than that in the ENG-SCI group since 3 months of treatment. The PBAC score in the LNG-IUD group improved better than that in the ENG-SCI group since 6 months of treatment (P ＜ 0.05). No significant difference in the occurrence rate of ideal vaginal bleeding patterns and the hemoglobin levels between the two groups was observed. The ENG-SCI group had a higher probability of weight gain and progesterone-related side effects (P ＜ 0.05). Both ENG-SCI and LNG-IUD were effective in treatment of adenomyosis. However, LNG-IUD had a more significant effect in treating adenomyosis-related dysmenorrhea, excessive menstrual flow, anemia, and uterine enlargement, with relatively fewer side effects.

Use of serum evaluation of contraceptive and ovarian hormones to assess reduced risk of pregnancy among women presenting for emergency contraception in a multicenter clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate ovulation risk among women enrolling in an emergency contraception (EC) study by measuring contraceptive steroids and ovarian hormones. STUDY DESIGN: We used standard chemiluminescent assays to evaluate endogenous hormones (estradiol, progesterone, follicle stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone) and liquid chromatography-tandem triple quadrupole mass spectrometry to simultaneously analyze concentrations of ethinylestradiol, dienogest, norelgestromin (NGMN), norethindrone (NET), gestodene, levonorgestrel (LNG), etonogestrel (ENG), segesterone acetate, medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), and drospirenone in serum samples obtained at the time of enrollment in a recent study comparing oral ulipristal acetate and LNG EC in women with weight ≥80 kg reporting no recent use of hormonal contraception. RESULTS: We enrolled 532 and obtained a valid baseline blood sample from 520 women. Of these, 117 (22.5%) had detectable concentrations of progestin (MPA [n = 58, 11.2%], LNG [50, 9.6%], ENG [11, 2.1%], NET [5, 0.96%], NGMN [3, 0.06%], or drospirenone [1, 0.02%]). LNG was co-detected in all three participants with samples containing NGMN. Multiple progestins were detected in eight other women: ENG/MPA (1), ENG/LNG (2), and MPA/LNG (5). Samples from 55 (10.6%) had concentrations of one or more progestin considered above the minimum level for contraceptive (MPA ≥ 0.1 ng/mL, n = 19; NGMN/LNG ≥ 0.2 ng/mL, n = 31; ENG ≥ 0.09 ng/mL, n = 8; NET ≥ 0.35 ng/mL, n = 4). We detected concentrations of serum progesterone ≥ 3 ng/mL, indicative of luteal phase (postovulation) status, in an additional 194 (37.3%) samples. CONCLUSIONS: More than one-third of enrolled in our clinical trial of oral EC had evidence of prior ovulation at the time of enrollment. Additionally, about 23% had evidence of recent use of hormonal contraception. These results would have decreased the expected risk of pregnancy in the study. IMPLICATIONS: Many participants in a recent clinical trial of oral emergency contraception did not appear to be at risk for pregnancy or would not have benefited from intervention due to cycle timing. Investigators should consider the effects of these findings on expected pregnancy rates when determining sample size in future EC clinical trials, particularly when using noninferiority designs or historical controls.

Emergency contraception for individuals weighing 80 kg or greater: A randomized trial of 30 mg ulipristal acetate and 1.5 mg or 3.0 mg levonorgestrel.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of emergency contraception (EC) regimens used within 72 hours of unprotected intercourse in individuals weighing ≥80 kg. STUDY DESIGN: We enrolled reproductive-aged healthy women in a multicenter, single-blind, randomized study of levonorgestrel 1.5 mg (LNG1X) and 3.0 mg (LNG2X) and ulipristal acetate 30 mg (UPA) (enrollment goal 1200). Key eligibility requirements included regular cycles, weight >/= 80kg, unprotected intercourse within 72 hours, no recent use of hormonal contraception, a negative urine pregnancy test (UPT), and willingness to abstain from intercourse until next menses. To assess our primary outcome of incidence of pregnancy, participants completed home UPTs; if no menses by 2-weeks post-treatment, or a positive UPT, they returned for an in-person visit with quantitative serum human chorionic gonadotropin and ultrasound. RESULTS: We enrolled and randomized 532; 44 were not dosed or not evaluable for primary end point, leaving an analyzable sample of 488 (173 LNG1X, 158 LNG2X, 157 UPA) with similar demographics between groups (mean age 29.6 years [5.74], body mass index 37.09 kg/m2 [6.95]). Five pregnancies occurred (LNG1X n = 1, LNG2X n = 1, UPA n = 3); none occurred during the highest at-risk window (day of ovulation and the 3 days prior). We closed the study before achieving our enrollment goal because the low pregnancy rate in all groups established futility based on an interim blinded analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Although slow enrollment limited our study power, we found no differences in pregnancy rates between EC regimens among women weighing 80 kg or more. Our results are not able to refute or support differences between the treatment arms. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clincialtrials.gov Clinical trials#: NCT03537768. IMPLICATIONS: Women weighing 80 kg or more experienced no differences in pregnancy rates between oral EC regimens but due to several significant study limitations including sample size and the lack of a study population at high risk of pregnancy, our results are not able to determine if differences in treatment effectiveness exist.

Efficacy of Levonorgestrel Intrauterine System in the Management of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding: A Retrospective Analysis of a 100 Women.

Aim: Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is a common gynaecological complaint affecting around 10-30% women during reproductive years. It adversely affects a woman's life, leading to psychological, medical, social and sexual problems. We aim to study the efficacy of a levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in 100 women suffering from AUB. Methodology: A retrospective study was carried out at a private nursing home in Mumbai over a period of 4 years. A total of 100 patients aged 30 years to 50 years (average age = 42.9 years) who underwent LNG-IUS insertion for abnormal uterine bleeding were studied. Cases were evaluated according to clinical findings, hemogram and transvaginal ultrasound. The women were called for follow-up at 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 1 and 2 years to analyse type and amount of bleeding and development of amenorrhea. Results: At the end of 6 months, 75% patients experienced decreased menstrual blood loss. Five patients underwent removal of the LNG-IUS at the end of 6 months as they experienced no relief of symptoms. At the end of 2 years, 95% patients were fully satisfied with the LNG-IUS insertion. Conclusion: A levonorgestrel intrauterine system significantly reduces bleeding in menorrhagia due to benign causes and is found to be highly effective in the management of various gynaecological pathologies such as endometrial polyps, adenomyosis and endometrial hyperplasia when insertion perfomed after dilatation and curettage/polypectomy. It has proven to be superior to various surgical and other non-surgical treatment modalities.

Is there a difference in the clinical profile and outcome of women using levonorgestrel IUD for abnormal uterine bleeding and those using it for contraception?: A comparative cross-sectional study.

Objective: The most common indications for Levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) are contraception and management of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB). This study was conducted with the aim of exploring the differences in the clinical profile and outcome of women using LNG-IUD for contraception and AUB. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective comparative cross-sectional study of women who underwent LNG-IUD (52 mg) between 2012 and 2017. Their electronic health records were reviewed until the last documented follow-up or until December 2021. Results: A total of 235 women had LNG-IUD with an age range of 21 to 62 years and a mean of (37.98 years±6.76). Of these women, 153/235 (65.1%) had it for contraception and 82/235 (34.89%) had it for AUB. The follow-up was 1-94 months with (mean ± SEM) follow-up for the AUB group of (21.48±2.31) months and for contraception group was (20.74±1.76) months (p-value of 0.80). There was a significant difference between the two groups in the age and body mass index (BMI), where women who had LNG-IUD for AUB were older (mean of 42.54±6.49 years, p-value <0.001) and had higher BMI (31.88±7.52 kg/m2, p-value =0.011). All LNG-IUDs that were indicated for contraception were inserted in an outpatient setting. However, 68.3% in the AUB, the insertion was in the operating theater in conjunction with hysteroscopy. After combining both expulsion and removal of LNG-IUD during the follow-up period, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups in the overall retention rate during the follow-up (p-value =0.998). Conclusion: this study shows that women using LNG-IUD for the management of AUB are older and have a higher BMI compared with those using it for contraception. AUB women experienced more expulsion compared with the contraception group, but there was no difference between the 2 groups in the overall survival/retention of LNG-IUD.

Body Mass Index and Levonorgestrel Device Expulsion in Adolescents and Young Adults.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between body mass and levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) expulsion in adolescents and young adults (AYA). DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS & INTERVENTIONS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of nulliparous females aged 10-24 years who had a 52-milligram LNG-IUD placed between November 2017 and May 2021 by pediatric and adolescent gynecology providers at a tertiary children's hospital, including those who underwent metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS). Primary analysis focused on 10-19 year olds as they had comparable anthropometrics (namely BMI percentile [BMIP] as defined by the Centers for Disease Control). Descriptive statistics included means, standard deviations (SD), and ranges for continuous variables counts and percentages for categorical variables. Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests were used to assess associations. Logistic regressions were fit to test the associations between BMIP, MBS, and the odds of expulsion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES & RESULTS: A total of 588 patients were included in the primary analysis (10-19 years). Mean age was 15.8 years (±2.0). Using BMIP, 15.5% (n = 91) of the sample was overweight and 22.3% (n = 131) were obese. Within 12 months, 33 patients (5.6%) experienced expulsion. Every one-unit increase in BMIP was associated with a 3% increase in the odds of expulsion (P = .008), and each increase in BMIP category (eg, overweight vs average/underweight) was significantly associated with increased odds of expulsion (OR = 2.77-4.28). Patients who had LNG-IUD placement during MBS (n = 43) had higher odds of expulsion (OR = 3.23; P = .024) than other patients. CONCLUSION: AYA with higher BMIP and/or who undergo MBS are at increased risk of LNG-IUD expulsion within one year of placement.