Clinical Assessment of 3 Intrauterine Devices in Adolescent Girls: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess clinical performance, bleeding pattern, dysmenorrhea, and satisfaction up to 1 year after placement of 3 types of intrauterine devices (IUDs) (TCu380A, levonorgestrel 52 mg, and levonorgestrel 19.5 mg) in adolescents METHODS: The study was a randomized trial with 318 adolescents allocated to the 3 IUDs. We assessed reasons for removal, continuation, menstrual patterns, dysmenorrhea, and satisfaction. RESULTS: Participants aged (mean ± SD) 17.9 ± 1.4 years, with 80.8% being nulligravidae. After 1 year, 265 (83.3%) continued using the IUD; however, the continuation rate of TCu380A (75.4 ± 4.2) was lower than that of both the levonorgestrel 52-mg (88.6 ± 3.1) and 19.5-mg IUDs (86.8 ± 3.3), and bleeding/pain and expulsion were the main reasons for removal of the TCu380A IUD. The duration of menstruation was longer among the TCu380A IUD users (6.0 ± 2.0 days) than those using the levonorgestrel 52 mg (2.5 ± 3.9) and 19.5 mg (3.2 ± 3.2) devices, P < .001. Amenorrhea was reported by 49.5% and 37.8% users of the levonorgestrel 52-mg and 19.5-mg devices, respectively, P < .001. Dysmenorrhea was reported in 68.5% of all participants at the baseline; this was 67.9% of the TCu380A group and 33.3% and 36.0% of the levonorgestrel 52-mg and 19.5-mg IUD groups, respectively, P < .001. Satisfaction ranged from 80.7% in the TCu380A group to 97.8% in the levonorgestrel 52-mg group (P = .03). CONCLUSION: The 3 IUDs are suitable for adolescents, with high contraceptive efficacies and rates of continuation within 1 year of use and high degrees of satisfaction. Users of the hormonal IUDs reported lower expulsion rates, more favorable menstrual patterns, and less dysmenorrhea compared with the TCu380A IUD.

Pain and ease of insertion of three different intrauterine devices in Brazilian adolescents: A participant-blinded randomized trial.

OBJECTIVES: To compare pain and ease of insertion of the copper 380 mm2, levonorgestrel 52 mg, and levonorgestrel 19.5-mg intrauterine devices (IUDs) in Brazilian adolescents. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a participant-blinded randomized trial at two clinics in Brazil. We enrolled 318 adolescents<19 years old in a 1:1:1 ratio from November 2021 to February 2022. We informed the adolescents about the IUD type inserted after they evaluated the pain associated with the IUD insertion using a Visual Analogue Scale and immediately after that the healthcare provider who placed the IUD evaluated the ease of the procedure. RESULTS: The VAS pain level was significantly higher after the levonorgestrel 52-mg IUD placement, median and [interquartile range, IQ] 8.0 [4.0] than the copper 380-mm2 IUD 7.0 [4.0], and the levonorgestrel 19.5-mg IUD 7.0 [6.0] (p = 0.001). The placement was easier after the copper 380-mm2 IUD (87/106, 82.1%) and the levonorgestrel 19.5-mg IUD (91/106, 85.8%) when compared with the levonorgestrel 52-mg IUD (75/105, 70.7%). After multiple logistic regression analyses, the higher VAS pain scores were associated with the levonorgestrel 52-mg IUD (OR = 2.90), low number of pregnancies (OR -0.48), and with a history of dysmenorrhea (OR = 2.67). CONCLUSIONS: The placement of the copper 380-mm2 IUD and the levonorgestrel 19.5-mg IUD was associated with lower pain according to the adolescent and was easier according to the provider when compared with the levonorgestrel 52-mg IUD. However, the small observed differences may not be clinically relevant. IMPLICATIONS: We found that the three types of IUDs were generally easy to place; however, mean pain scores were high during insertions. Our findings of high pain scores reinforce the need for interventions to reduce pain for adolescent IUD insertion.

Riesgo de cáncer de mama en portadoras de DIU de levonorgestrel. Revisión sistemática / Risk of breast cancer in carriers of levonorgestrel IUD. A systematic review

Introducción: El cáncer de mama es la primera causa de muerte por cáncer en mujeres europeas. Se plantea la duda de si el uso de DIU de levonorgestrel (DIU-LNG) podría estar asociado a un aumento del riesgo del mismo. Material y métodos: Realizamos una revisión sistemática para identificar el riesgo de cáncer de mama entre las usuarias de DIU-LNG. Resultados: Hemos encontrado ocho artículos, todos ellos realizados con el DIU Mirena® y observacionales. La mitad de los estudios no encuentra aumento del riesgo de cáncer de mama en las portadoras de DIU-LNG y la otra mitad sí. La heterogeneidad de estos estudios, así como la existencia de sesgo en ellos, y la ausencia de control de otros factores nos impiden la realización de metaanálisis. Conclusiones: Con la evidencia científica actual no podemos afirmar que exista mayor riesgo de cáncer de mama en las portadoras de DIU-LNG. Se requieren estudios bien diseñados para establecer conclusiones claras.(AU)

Introduction: Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in European women. The question arises whether the use of levonorgestrel IUD (LNG-IUD) could be associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. Material and methods: We conducted a systematic review to identify the risk of breast cancer among LNG-IUD users. Results: We found 8 articles, all of them observational and concerning the Mirena® IUD. Half of the studies do not find an increased risk of breast cancer in LNG-IUD carriers and the other half do. The heterogeneity of these studies, as well as the existence of bias in them, and the absence of control for other factors prevent us from performing a meta-analysis. Conclusions: With the current scientific evidence we cannot confirm that there is a reater risk of breast cancer in LNG-IUD carriers. Well-designed studies are required to draw clear conclusions.(AU)

Anastrozole and levonorgrestrel-releasing intrauterine device in the treatment of endometriosis: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: To study the effectiveness of an aromatase inhibitor (Anastrozole) associated with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD, Mirena®) in the treatment of endometriosis. METHODS: Prospective, randomized clinical trial. SETTING: University Hospital (single center). Elegibility criteria: Endometriomas > 3 × 4 cm, CA-125 > 35 U/mL and endometriosis symptoms. PATIENTS: Thirty-one women randomized to anastrozole + Mirena® + Conservative Surgery(CS) (n = 8), anastrozole + Mirena® + transvaginal ultrasound-guided puncture-aspiration (TUGPA) (n = 7), Mirena® + CS (n = 9), or Mirena® + TUGPA (n = 7). INTERVENTIONS: Anastrozole 1 mg/day and/or only Mirena® for 6 months; CS (ovarian and fertility-sparing) or TUGPA of endometriomas one month after starting medical treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual analogic scale for symptoms, CA-125 levels, ultrasound findings of endometriomas and recurrences. RESULTS: A significant improvement in symptoms during the treatment (difference of 43%, 95% CI 29.9-56.2) occurred, which was maintained at 1 and 2 years. It was more significant in patients including anastrozole in their treatment (51%, 95% CI 33.3-68.7). For CA-125, the most significant decrease was observed in patients not taking anastrozole (73.8%, 95% CI 64.2-83.4 vs. 53.8%, 95% CI 25.7-81.6 under Mirena® + anastrozole). After CS for endometriosis, a reduction of ultrasound findings of endometriomas and long-term recurrence occurred, with or without anastrozole. At 4.2 ± 1.7 years (95% CI 3.57-4.85), 88% of the patients who underwent CS were asymptomatic, without medication or reoperation, compared to only 21% if TUGPA was performed, with or without anastrozole (p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Dosing anastrozole for 6 months, starting one month before CS of endometriosis, reduces significantly the painful symptoms and delays recurrence, but has no other significant advantages over the single insertion of LNG-IUD (Mirena®) during the same time. Anastrozole and/or only Mirena® associated with TUGPA are not effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Eudra CT System of the European Medicines Agency (London, 29-Sept-2008) Nº EudraCT: 2008-005744-17 (07/11/2008). Date of enrolment of first patient: 15/01/2009.

Controversies in family planning: intrauterine device placement in solid organ transplant patients.

With an ever-increasing number of reproductive-aged women undergoing solid organ transplant and fertility improving after transplant, knowledge of the safety and efficacy of various contraceptive methods is essential to guide patient selection. We present the case of a 22-year-old patient desiring an intrauterine device (IUD) for contraception with a history of liver transplant as a child. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and American Society for Transplantation (AST) offer conflicting recommendations on the use of IUDs in transplant patients. We review the literature for recommendations on IUD use in this population. While the literature is limited, levonorgestrel (LNG) and copper (Cu) IUDs appear to be safe and effective in solid organ transplant patients, with no evidence of unintended pregnancies or complications compared to those without organ transplant. Ultimately, patient preference should be the primary consideration in contraceptive choice, including between LNG or Cu-IUD.

One-year continuation of copper or levonorgestrel intrauterine devices initiated at the time of emergency contraception.

OBJECTIVE(S): This study compares 1-year intrauterine device (IUD) continuation among women presenting for emergency contraception (EC) and initiating the copper (Cu T380A) IUD or the levonorgestrel (LNG) 52 mg IUD plus 1.5 mg oral LNG. STUDY DESIGN: This cohort study enrolled 188 women who presented at a single family planning clinic in Utah between June 2013 and September 2014 and selected either the Cu T380A IUD or LNG 52 mg IUD plus oral LNG for EC. Trained personnel followed participants by phone, text or e-mail for 12 months or until discontinuation occurred. We assessed reasons for discontinuation and used Cox proportional hazard models, Kaplan-Meier estimates and log-rank tests to assess differences in continuation rates between IUDs. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-six women received IUDs; 66 (37%) chose the Cu T380A IUD and 110 (63%) chose the LNG 52 mg IUD plus oral LNG. At 1 year, we accounted for 147 (84%) participants, 33 (22%) had requested removals, 13 (9%) had an expulsion and declined reinsertion, 3 (2%) had a pregnancy with their IUD in place and 98 (67%) were still using their device. Continuation rates did not differ by IUD type; 60% of Cu T380A IUD users and 70% of LNG 52 mg IUD plus oral LNG users were still using their device at 12 months (adjusted hazard ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.40-1.3). CONCLUSION(S): Two-thirds of women who chose IUD placement at the EC clinical encounter continued use at 1 year. Women initiating Cu T380A IUD and LNG 52 mg IUD had similar 1-year continuation rates. These findings support same-day insertion of IUDs for women who are seeking EC and would like to use a highly effective reversible method going forward. IMPLICATIONS: Providing IUD options for EC users presents an opportunity to increase availability of highly effective contraception.

Trends in use of and complications from intrauterine contraceptive devices and tubal ligation or occlusion.

BACKGROUND: Long-acting reversible contraceptives such as intrauterine devices (IUDs) are highly effective in preventing pregnancy, cost effective, and increasing in popularity. It is unclear whether changes in IUD use are associated with changes in rates of irreversible tubal sterilization. In this analysis, we evaluate changes in rates of tubal sterilization, insertion of copper or levonorgestrel (LNG) IUDs, and related complications over time. METHODS: Data were obtained from a retrospective claims database (OptumTM ClinformaticsTM Data Mart) of women aged 15 to 45 years who underwent insertion of copper or LNG IUD or tubal sterilization between 1/1/2006 and 12/31/2011. Outcomes of interest included annual rates of insertion or sterilization and annual rates of potential complications and side effects. RESULTS: The number of women included in the analysis each year ranged from 1,870,675 to 2,016,916. Between 2006 and 2011, copper IUD insertion claim rates increased from 0.18 to 0.25% and LNG IUD insertion claim rates increased from 0.63 to 1.15%, while sterilization claims decreased from 0.78 to 0.66% (P < 0.0001 for all comparisons). Increases in IUD insertion were apparent in all age groups; decreases in tubal sterilization occurred in women aged 20 to 34 years. The most common side effects and complications were amenorrhea (7.36-11.59%), heavy menstrual bleeding (4.85-15.69%), and pelvic pain (11.12-14.27%). Significant increases in claims of certain complications associated with IUD insertion or sterilization were also observed. CONCLUSION: Between 2006 and 2011, a decrease in sterilization rates accompanied an increase in IUD insertion rates, suggesting that increasing numbers of women opted for reversible methods of long-term contraception over permanent sterilization.

Preference for and efficacy of oral levonorgestrel for emergency contraception with concomitant placement of a levonorgestrel IUD: a prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: We assessed intrauterine device (IUD) preference among women presenting for emergency contraception (EC) and the probability of pregnancy among concurrent oral levonorgestrel (LNG) plus LNG 52 mg IUD EC users. METHODS: We offered women presenting for EC at a single family planning clinic the CuT380A IUD (copper IUD) or oral LNG 1.5 mg plus the LNG 52 mg IUD. Two weeks after IUD insertion, participants reported the results of a self-administered home urine pregnancy test. The primary outcome, EC failure, was defined as pregnancies resulting from intercourse occurring within five days prior to IUD insertion. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-eight women enrolled and provided information regarding their current menstrual cycle and recent unprotected intercourse. Sixty-seven (36%) chose the copper IUD and 121 (64%) chose oral LNG plus the LNG IUD. The probability of pregnancy two weeks after oral LNG plus LNG IUD EC use was 0.9% (95% CI 0.0-5.1%). The only positive pregnancy test after treatment occurred in a woman who received oral LNG plus the LNG IUD and who had reported multiple episodes of unprotected intercourse including an episode more than 5 days prior to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Study participants seeking EC who desired an IUD preferentially chose oral LNG 1.5 mg with the LNG 52 mg IUD over the copper IUD. Neither group had EC treatment failures. Including the option of oral LNG 1.5 mg with concomitant insertion of the LNG 52 mg IUD in EC counseling may increase the number of EC users who opt to initiate highly effective reversible contraception. IMPLICATIONS: Consideration should be given to LNG IUD insertion with concomitant use of oral LNG 1.5 mg for EC. Use of this combination may increase the number of women initiating highly effective contraception at the time of their EC visit.

Safety and efficacy in parous women of a 52-mg levonorgestrel-medicated intrauterine device: a 7-year randomized comparative study with the TCu380A.

OBJECTIVES: To compare rates of unintended pregnancy, method continuation and reasons for removal among women using the 52-mg levonorgestrel (daily release 20 microg) intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) or the copper T 380 A IUD (TCu380A). STUDY DESIGN: This was an open-label 7-year randomized controlled trial in 20 centres, 11 of which in China. Data on 1884 women with interval insertion of the LNG-IUD and 1871 of the TCu380A were analysed using life tables with 30-day intervals and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: The cumulative 7-year pregnancy rate of the LNG-IUD was 0.5 (standard error 0.2) per 100, significantly lower than 2.5 (0.4) per 100 of the TCu380A, cumulative method discontinuation rates at 7 years were 70.6 (1.2) and 40.8 (1.3) per 100, respectively. Dominant reasons for discontinuing the LNG-IUD were amenorrhea (26.1 [1.3] per 100) and reduced bleeding (12.5 [1.1] per 100), particularly in Chinese women and, for the TCu380A, increased bleeding (9.9 [0.9] per 100), especially among non-Chinese women. Removal rates for pain were similar for the two intrauterine devices (IUDs). Cumulative rates of removal for symptoms compatible with hormonal side effects were 5.7 (0.7) and 0.4 (0.2) per 100 for the LNG-IUD and TCu380A, respectively, and cumulative losses to follow-up at 7 years were 26.0 (1.4) and 36.9 (1.3) per 100, respectively. CONCLUSION: The LNG-IUD and the TCu380A have very high contraceptive efficacy, with the LNG-IUD significantly higher than the TCu380A. Overall rates of IUD removals were higher among LNG-IUD users than TCu380A users. Removals for amenorrhea appeared culturally associated. IMPLICATIONS: The 52-mg LNG-IUD and the TCu380A have very high contraceptive efficacy through 7 years. As an IUD, the unique side effects of the LNG-IUD are reduced bleeding, amenorrhea and symptoms compatible with hormonal contraceptives.

Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device Placement in a Premenopausal Breast Cancer Patient with a Bicornuate Uterus.

Young women with breast cancer face contraceptive challenges. Data are limited and conflicting on the use of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) in this patient population. A 32-year-old nulligravid woman with a history of breast cancer on tamoxifen presented with new-onset vaginal bleeding. Further workup revealed a previously undiagnosed bicornuate uterus. She underwent hysteroscopy, dilation and curettage, and LNG-IUD placement in each uterine horn. Postoperative follow-up confirmed retention and proper placement of both IUDs. Pathology from the dilation and curettage was benign, and the abnormal uterine bleeding abated. LNG-IUD placement in a young patient with a personal history of breast cancer on tamoxifen and a bicornuate uterus is a safe and feasible alternative for contraception.