Hormone-related side effects in new users of a levonorgestrel 52-mg intrauterine device.

BACKGROUND: Although the levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine device is locally active and has low systemic hormone exposure, hormonal intrauterine device users sometimes report hormone-related side effects. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate hormone-related adverse event rates among all participants and compare these among those who used combined hormonal or no hormonal contraception in the month before enrollment. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 1714 women aged 16 to 45 years old received a levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine device in a multicenter phase 3 trial to evaluate contraceptive efficacy and safety for up to 10 years. This analysis evaluated a subset of participants who used combined hormonal or no hormonal contraception in the month prior to device placement. We assessed all nonexpulsion, nonbleeding-related events with ≥1% incidence at 180 days with a plan to include weight increase regardless of incidence; we excluded events considered nonhormonal. We computed 180-day side effect frequency rates based on the number of days a side effect was reported during the study period. We created a multivariable model for side effect incidence at 180 days based on age, race, ethnicity, body mass index at enrollment, parity, and contraception use in the month before enrollment. For those side effects with a P value <.2 on univariate comparison between combined hormonal and no hormonal contraception users, we secondarily evaluated 360-day event rates. RESULTS: Overall, 644 participants used combined hormonal contraception (primarily oral [n=499, 77.5%]) and 855 used no hormonal method before intrauterine device placement. Individual side effect rates over the first 180 days did not differ between prior combined hormonal and no hormonal contraception users except for acne (84 [13.0%] vs 73 [8.5%], respectively), P=.006, odds ratio 1.61 (95% confidence interval 1.15-2.24). However, this association was weaker after adjustment for age, race, ethnicity, obesity status, and parity (adjusted odds ratio 1.40, 95% confidence interval 0.99-1.98) At 360 days, prior combined hormonal contraception users were more likely to report acne (101 [15.7%] vs 91 [10.6%], respectively, P=.005) and orgasm/libido problems (20 [3.1%] vs 12 [1.4%], respectively, P=.03). Over the first 180 days, all side effects other than acne were reported in less than 3% of days; acne was reported an average of 13 days (7.4%) per prior combined hormonal contraception user and 9 days (5.0%) per prior nonhormonal contraception user (P<.0001). Discontinuation for evaluated side effects occurred in 83 (5.5%) participants with no difference between those who used combined hormonal (36 [5.6%]) or no hormonal contraception (47 [5.5%], P=1.0) before study entry. CONCLUSION: Using combined hormonal contraception prior to levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine device placement is weakly associated with reporting hormonally related side effects like acne. Only a small percentage of levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine device users experienced potentially hormone-related side effects during the initial 6 months of use that resulted in discontinuation.

Levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine system efficacy and safety through 8 years of use.

BACKGROUND: Extending hormonal intrauterine system duration will allow users to have less need for procedures to provide long-term contraception. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine system during years 7 and 8 of use. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 1751 nulliparous and multiparous participants aged 16 to 45 years enrolled in a phase 3, multicenter trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the use of the Liletta levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine system for up to 10 years. Participants aged 36 to 45 years at enrollment underwent safety evaluation only. After the first year, we evaluated participants every 6 months for intrauterine system location confirmation and urine pregnancy testing at each visit. We assessed the Pearl Indices in years 7 and 8 and the life-table analysis for cumulative pregnancy rates through 8 years of use. For the primary efficacy analyses, all participants aged 16 to 35 years at enrollment were included through year 6; years 7 and 8 included only users aged ≤39 years at the start of each use year. Safety outcomes were assessed in all participants regardless of duration of use. We assessed amenorrhea rates, defined as no bleeding or spotting in the 90 days before the end of the year. RESULTS: After intrauterine system placement, we followed 1568 participants aged 16 to 35 years and 146 participants aged 36 to 45 years. The 16- to 35-year-old participants included 986 (57.5%) nulliparous and 433 (25.3%) obese users. Overall, 569 participants started year 7, 478 completed year 7 (380 aged ≤39 years at beginning of year) and 343 completed year 8 (257 aged ≤39 years at beginning of year); 77 completed 10 years of use. Eleven pregnancies occurred over 8 years, 7 (64%) of which were ectopic. Two pregnancies occurred in year 7 (Pearl Index, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-1.78), 1 in a participant with implantation 4 days after a desired removal; no pregnancies occurred in year 8. The cumulative life-table pregnancy rate in the primary efficacy population through year 8 was 1.32 (95% confidence interval, 0.69-2.51); without the postremoval pregnancy, the rate was 1.09 (95% confidence interval, 0.56-2.13). Two perforations (0.1%) occurred, none noted after year 1. Expulsion occurred in 71 (4.1%) participants overall, with 3 in year 7 and 2 in year 8. Pelvic infection was diagnosed in 16 (0.9%) participants during intrauterine system use, 1 each in years 7 and 8. Only 44 (2.6%) participants overall discontinued because of bleeding complaints (4 total in years 7 and 8) with rates per year of 0.1% to 0.5% for years 3 to 8. Amenorrhea rates were 39% at both years 7 and 8. CONCLUSION: The levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine system is highly effective over 8 years of use and has an excellent extended safety profile. This report details the longest period of efficacy and safety data for continuous use of a levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine system for contraception.

Relationship of parity and prior cesarean delivery to levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine system expulsion over 6 years.

OBJECTIVE: Assess the relationship between parity and prior route of delivery to levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine system (IUS) expulsion during the first 72 months of use. STUDY DESIGN: We evaluated women enrolled in the ACCESS IUS multicenter, Phase 3, open-label clinical trial of the Liletta levonorgestrel 52 mg IUS. Investigators evaluated IUS presence at 3 and 6 months after placement and then every 6 months and during unscheduled visits. We included women with successful placement and at least one follow-up assessment. We evaluated expulsion rates based on obstetric history; for prior delivery method subanalyses, we excluded 12 participants with missing delivery data. We determined predictors of expulsion using multivariable regression analyses. RESULTS: Of 1714 women with IUS placement, 1710 had at least one follow-up assessment. The total population included 986 (57.7%) nulliparous women. Sixty-five (3.8%) women experienced expulsion within 72 months, 50 (76.9%) within the first 12 months. Expulsion rates among nulliparous women (22/986 [2.2%]) or parous women with any pregnancy ending with a Cesarean delivery (6/195 [3.1%]) differed from parous women who only experienced vaginal deliveries (37/517 [7.2%]) (p < 0.001). In multivariable regression, obesity (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-3.7), parity (aOR 2.2, 95% CI 1.2-4.1), and non-white race (aOR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-3.2) predicted expulsion. Among parous women, obesity (aOR 2.2, 95% CI 1.2-4.2) increased the odds and having ever had a cesarean delivery (aOR 0.4, 95% CI 0.1-0.9) decreased the odds of expulsion. CONCLUSION: IUS expulsion occurs in less than 4% of users over the first 6 years of use and occurs mostly during the first year. Expulsion is more likely among obese and parous women. IMPLICATIONS: Levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine system expulsion occured more commonly in parous than nulliparous women; the increase in parous women is primarily in women who had vaginal deliveries only. The association between obesity, delivery route, and IUS expulsion needs further elucidation.

Conception rates in women desiring pregnancy after levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine system (Liletta®) discontinuation.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate reproductive function in nulligravid and gravid women after levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine system (IUS) discontinuation based on time to pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: We evaluated women participating in the ACCESS IUS multicenter, Phase 3, open-label clinical trial of the Liletta(®) levonorgestrel 52 mg IUS who discontinued the IUS within 60 months of use and desired pregnancy. Study staff contacted participants every three months after IUS discontinuation for up to 12 months to determine whether pregnancy occurred. We excluded women who opted to stop attempting to conceive before 12 months. We evaluated 12-month conception rates in participants 16-35 years at IUS placement, comparing dichotomous outcomes using Fisher's exact test. We performed a multivariable analysis to assess the association of baseline characteristics, age at discontinuation, duration of IUS use, and positive sexually transmitted infection testing during IUS use with conception. RESULTS: Among 165 women who attempted to conceive, 142 (86.1%) did so within 12 months with a median time to conception of 92 days. The 12-month conception rates did not differ between nulligravid (66/76 [86.8%]) and gravid (76/89 [85.4%]) women (p = 0.83) and nulliparous (78/90 [86.7%]) and parous (64/75 [85.3%]) women (p = 0.83). In multivariable analysis, only obesity (aOR 0.3 [95% CI 0.1-0.8]) was associated with ability to conceive. CONCLUSIONS: After levonorgestrel 52 mg IUS discontinuation, women have rapid return of fertility in the year post-removal. Fertility rates after IUS removal do not vary based on gravidity, parity, age at discontinuation, or duration of IUS use. IMPLICATIONS: This contemporary IUS study included a large population of nulligravid and nulliparous women. IUS use over many years does not effect spontaneous fertility after IUS discontinuation, regardless of gravidity or parity. Providers and patients should have no concern about the impact of IUS use on future fertility.

Six-year contraceptive efficacy and continued safety of a levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine system.

OBJECTIVE: To assess 6-year contraceptive efficacy and safety of a levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine system (IUS). STUDY DESIGN: We assessed pregnancy rates through 72 months in women aged 16-35 years at enrollment and safety in all participants (aged 16-45 years, n = 1751) in an ongoing 10-year phase-3 trial. RESULTS: Over six years, nine pregnancies occurred (none in year 6) for a life-table pregnancy rate of 0.87 (95% CI 0.44-1.70). Adverse event rates remain low through 6 or more years of use. Two expulsions occurred in year 6. CONCLUSION: This levonorgestrel 52 mg IUS is a highly effective and safe contraceptive over 6 years of use. IMPLICATIONS: The levonorgestrel 52 mg IUS shows high 6-year contraceptive efficacy and a low rate of adverse events through 6 or more years of use.

Bleeding changes after levonorgestrel 52-mg intrauterine system insertion for contraception in women with self-reported heavy menstrual bleeding.

BACKGROUND: The levonorgestrel 52-mg intrauterine system has proven efficacy for heavy menstrual bleeding treatment in clinical trials, but few data exist to demonstrate how rapidly the effects occur and the effects in women with self-reported heavy bleeding, as seen commonly in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate changes in bleeding patterns in women with self-reported heavy menstrual bleeding before levonorgestrel 52-mg intrauterine system insertion. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 1714 women aged 16-45 years old received a levonorgestrel 52-mg intrauterine system in a multicenter trial evaluating contraceptive efficacy and safety for up to 10 years. At screening, participants described their baseline menstrual bleeding patterns for the previous 3 months. Participants completed daily diaries with subjective evaluation of bleeding information for the first 2 years. For this analysis, we included women with at least 1 complete 28-day cycle of intrauterine system use and excluded women using a hormonal or copper intrauterine contraception in the month prior to study enrollment. We evaluated changes in menstrual bleeding and discontinuation for bleeding complaints per 28-day cycle over 26 cycles (2 years) in women who self-reported their baseline pattern as heavy. We also compared rates of amenorrhea, defined as no bleeding or spotting, within the entire study population in women with subjective heavy menstrual bleeding at baseline compared with those who did not complain of heavy menstrual bleeding. RESULTS: Of the 1513 women in this analysis, 150 (9.9%) reported baseline heavy menstrual bleeding. The majority of women reported no longer experiencing heavy menstrual bleeding by the end of cycle 1 (112/150, 74.7%) with even greater rates by cycle 2 (124/148, 83.8%). At the end of cycles 6, 13, and 26, 129 of 140 (92.1%; 95% confidence interval, 87.7%-96.6%), 114 of 123 (92.7%; 95% confidence interval, 88.1%-97.3%), and 100 of 103 (97.1%; 95% confidence interval, 93.8%-100%) women reported no heavy menstrual bleeding, respectively. After cycles 13 and 26, 63 of 123 (51.2%; 95% confidence interval, 42.4%-60.1%) and 66 of 103 (64.1%; 95% confidence interval, 54.8%-73.3%), respectively, reported their bleeding as amenorrhea or spotting only. A lower proportion of women with baseline self-reported heavy menstrual bleeding reported amenorrhea as compared with women in the overall study cohort without heavy menstrual bleeding at the end of 6 cycles (319 [25.5%] vs 21 [15.0%], P=.005) and 13 cycles (382 [34.4%] vs 26 [21.1%], P=.003); differences were not significant after 19 cycles (367 [37.2%] vs 36 [31.0%], P=.022) and 26 cycles (383 [43.5%] vs 38 [36.9%], P=.21). Only 4 (2.7%) women with baseline heavy menstrual bleeding discontinued for bleeding complaints (2 for heavy menstrual bleeding and 2 for irregular bleeding), all within the first year. CONCLUSION: Most women who self-report heavy menstrual bleeding experience significant improvement quickly after levonorgestrel 52-mg intrauterine system insertion. Discontinuation for bleeding complaints among women with baseline heavy menstrual bleeding is very low.

Levonorgestrel-releasing intra-uterine systems as female contraceptives.

INTRODUCTION: The availability and use of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs), such as levonorgestrel intrauterine systems (LNG-IUSs), have increased in recent times. AREAS COVERED: The authors provide a narrative review of the LNG-IUSs currently available worldwide as female contraceptives (LNG-IUS 13.5, 19.5 and 52 mg). Specific features of the devices and their parameters of efficacy and tolerability were considered as outcomes. EXPERT OPINION: The one-handed 3.8-mm-diameter inserter of LNG-IUS 13.5 mg and 19.5 mg may be particularly suitable in nulliparous women. While LNG-IUSs 13.5, 19.5 mg and LNG 52 mg should be used by women simply looking for an effective contraceptive method for up to 3, 4 or 5 years, LNG-IUS 52 mg has also been approved for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding and endometrial protection during hormone replacement therapy. LNG-IUS 52 mg is ideal for women who are experiencing a certain hyperestrogenic hormonal environment, with heavy menstrual bleeding due to hormonal imbalances, adenomyosis or fibroids, in the case of symptomatic endometriosis or for endometrial protection during hormone estrogenic replacement therapy in non-hysterectomized women.

Bleeding patterns for the Liletta® levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine system.

PURPOSE: Evaluate bleeding patterns for the Liletta® levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine system (IUS) using the World Health Organization Belsey definitions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective multicenter trial evaluates the efficacy and safety of Liletta® (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00995150). We evaluated bleeding patterns for 1700 nulliparous and multiparous women using a daily diary completed by participants for the first 2 years and by questionnaire every 3 months thereafter. We assessed amenorrhea rates over 3 years and the proportion of subjects with infrequent, frequent, prolonged and irregular bleeding per 90-day reference period over 2 years for the entire study population as well as comparing nulliparous and parous women and obese and non-obese women. RESULTS: Amenorrhea rates at 1 and 3 years in levonorgestrel 52 mg IUS users were 19 and 37%, respectively. The infrequent bleeding rate increased from 14% in the first 90 days to 30% at the end of Year 1, and was maintained at the same rate through Year 2. Frequent, prolonged and irregular bleeding declined to low levels by the end of the first year. Discontinuation for bleeding-related complaints occurred in 35 (2.1%, 95% CI 1.3-2.7%) women during the first 36 months; only one subject discontinued for amenorrhea (in Year 2). Outcomes did not vary for nulliparous versus parous or obese versus non-obese women. CONCLUSIONS: Among Liletta users, amenorrhea and infrequent bleeding become more prevalent over time and amenorrhea rates continue to increase after the first year of use. Bleeding patterns do not differ significantly by parity or by obesity-status. Discontinuation for bleeding concerns is uncommon with this product.

Changes in uptake and cost of long-acting reversible contraceptive devices following the introduction of a new low-cost levonorgestrel IUD in Utah's Title X clinics: a retrospective review.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to assess changes in long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) method uptake at Utah's Title X clinics before and after introduction of a new, low-cost levonorgestrel (LNG) 52mg IUD (Liletta®). STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective medical record review of LARC visits occurring at seven Title-X family planning clinics in Utah before the introduction of the low-cost LNG IUD (preintroduction period: 01/01/2014-04/30/2015) and after (postintroduction period: 05/01/2015-03/31/2016). We ran segmented, interrupted time series ordinary least squares regression models using Newey-West standard errors to assess both the change in numbers of women initiating any LARC method and the average payment amount per LARC method. We evaluated both the low-cost LNG IUD and all LARC methods. RESULTS: At the outset of preintroduction period, there were 29.2 [95% confidence interval (CI): 20.1-38.4] monthly LNG IUD insertions. Immediately postintroduction, there was a significant level of increase of 14.4 LNG IUD insertions the first month (95% CI: 2.0-26.8) followed by a significant trend increase each month of 2.4 additional LNG IUD insertions (95% CI: 0.32-4.47). Postintroduction, there was a significant level of remitted-payment decrease from all sources of -$240.43 per LNG IUD (95% CI: -311.02 to 168.87) followed by a significant monthly trend decrease of -$23.01 per LNG IUD (95% CI: -32.02 to -13.98). There were minimal changes in uptake and payment of other LARC methods following the introduction of the low-cost LNG IUD. CONCLUSIONS: Following introduction of a low-cost LNG IUD at Title X clinics, LNG IUD initiation increased and average payment for the method decreased. IMPLICATIONS: Reducing the cost of LARC methods, both to clinics and to patients, is essential to expanding access. Additional efforts to develop and provide access to low-cost copper IUDs and subdermal implants as well as novel LARC methods should be continued.

Amenorrhea rates and predictors during 1 year of levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine system use.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate amenorrhea patterns and predictors of amenorrhea during the first year after levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine system (IUS) placement. STUDY DESIGN: This cohort analysis includes 1714 nulliparous and parous women who received a Liletta® levonorgestrel 52 mg IUS in a multicenter trial to evaluate efficacy and safety for up to 8 years. Participants maintained a daily diary with bleeding information. We assessed bleeding patterns in 90-day intervals; amenorrhea was defined as no bleeding or spotting in the preceding 90 days. We employed multivariable regression to identify predictors of amenorrhea at 12 months. The predictor analysis only included women not using a levonorgestrel IUS in the month prior to study enrollment. RESULTS: In the month before enrollment, 148 and 1566 women, respectively, had used and not used a levonorgestrel IUS. Prior users averaged 50±19 months of use before IUS placement; 38.4% of these women reported amenorrhea at 12 months. Amenorrhea rates for non-prior-users at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months were 0.2%, 9.1%, 17.2% and 16.9%, respectively. During the first 12 months, 29 (1.7%) women discontinued for bleeding irregularities; no women discontinued for amenorrhea. The only significant predictor of amenorrhea at 12 months was self-reported baseline duration of menstrual flow of fewer than 7 days vs. 7 or more days (18.2% vs. 5.2%, adjusted odds ratio 3.70 [1.69, 8.07]). We found no relationships between 12-month amenorrhea rates and age, parity, race, body mass index, baseline flow intensity or hormonal contraception use immediately prior to IUS placement. CONCLUSIONS: Amenorrhea rates during the first year of levonorgestrel 52 mg IUS use are similar at 9 and 12 months. Amenorrhea at 12 months is most common among women with shorter baseline duration of menstrual flow. IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT: This information provides more data for clinicians when counseling women about amenorrhea expectations, especially since women seeking a levonorgestrel 52 mg IUS for contraception are different than women desiring treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding. Amenorrhea at 12 months is most common among women with shorter baseline duration of menstrual flow.

A prospective assessment of pelvic infection risk following same-day sexually transmitted infection testing and levonorgestrel intrauterine system placement.

BACKGROUND: Misperceptions persist that intrauterine device placement is related to pelvic infections and Chlamydia and gonorrhea testing results are needed prior to placement. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the relationship of Chlamydia and gonorrhea screening to pelvic infection for up to 2 years following placement of the levonorgestrel 52-mg intrauterine system. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 1751 nulliparous and multiparous females 16 to 45 years old enrolled in a multicenter trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new levonorgestrel intrauterine system for up to 7 years. Participants had Chlamydia screening at study entry and yearly if they were age ≤25 years. Women also had baseline gonorrhea screening if testing had not been performed since starting their current sexual relationship. Those who changed sexual partners during the trial had repeated Chlamydia and gonorrhea testing. Intrauterine system insertion could occur on the same day as screening. Participants did not receive prophylactic antibiotics for intrauterine system placement. Investigators performed pelvic examinations after 12 and 24 months and when clinically indicated during visits at 3, 6, and 18 months after placement and unscheduled visits. Pelvic infection included any clinical diagnosis of pelvic inflammatory disease or endometritis. RESULTS: Most participants (n = 1364, 79.6%) did not have sexually transmitted infection test results available prior to intrauterine system placement. In all, 29 (1.7%) participants had positive baseline testing for a sexually transmitted infection (Chlamydia, n = 25; gonorrhea, n = 3; both, n = 1); 6 of these participants had known results (all with Chlamydia infection) prior to intrauterine system placement and received treatment before enrollment. The 23 participants whose results were not known at the time of intrauterine system placement received treatment without intrauterine system removal and none developed pelvic infection. The incidence of positive Chlamydia testing was similar among those with and without known test results at the time of intrauterine system placement (1.9% vs 1.5%, respectively, P = .6). Nine (0.5%) participants had a diagnosis of pelvic infection over 2 years after placement, all of whom had negative Chlamydia screening on the day of or within 1 month after intrauterine system placement. Infections were diagnosed in 3 participants within 7 days, 1 at 39 days, and 5 at ≥6 months. Seven participants received outpatient antibiotic treatment and 2 (diagnoses between 6-12 months after placement) received inpatient treatment. Two (0.1%) participants had intrauterine system removal related to infection (at 6 days and at 7 months after placement), both of whom only required outpatient treatment. CONCLUSION: Conducting Chlamydia and gonorrhea testing on the same day as intrauterine system placement is associated with a low risk of pelvic infection (0.2%). Over the first 2 years of intrauterine system use, infections are infrequent and not temporally related to intrauterine system placement. Pelvic infection can be successfully treated in most women with outpatient antibiotics and typically does not require intrauterine system removal. Women without clinical evidence of active infection can have intrauterine system placement and sexually transmitted infection screening, if indicated, on the same day.

Levonorgestrel release rates over 5 years with the Liletta® 52-mg intrauterine system.

OBJECTIVE: To understand the potential duration of action for Liletta®, we conducted this study to estimate levonorgestrel (LNG) release rates over approximately 5½years of product use. METHODS: Clinical sites in the U.S. Phase 3 study of Liletta collected the LNG intrauterine systems (IUSs) from women who discontinued the study. We randomly selected samples within 90-day intervals after discontinuation of IUS use through 900days (approximately 2.5years) and 180-day intervals for the remaining duration through 5.4years (1980days) to evaluate residual LNG content. We also performed an initial LNG content analysis using 10 randomly selected samples from a single lot. We calculated the average ex vivo release rate using the residual LNG content over the duration of the analysis. RESULTS: We analyzed 64 samples within 90-day intervals (range 6-10 samples per interval) through 900days and 36 samples within 180-day intervals (6 samples per interval) for the remaining duration. The initial content analysis averaged 52.0±1.8mg. We calculated an average initial release rate of 19.5mcg/day that decreased to 17.0, 14.8, 12.9, 11.3 and 9.8mcg/day after 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5years, respectively. The 5-year average release rate is 14.7mcg/day. CONCLUSION: The estimated initial LNG release rate and gradual decay of the estimated release rate are consistent with the target design and function of the product. The calculated LNG content and release rate curves support the continued evaluation of Liletta as a contraceptive for 5 or more years of use. IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT: Liletta LNG content and release rates are comparable to published data for another LNG 52-mg IUS. The release rate at 5years is more than double the published release rate at 3years with an LNG 13.5-mg IUS, suggesting continued efficacy of Liletta beyond 5years.

A Lower-Cost Option for Intrauterine Contraception.

In March 2015, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved Liletta (Actavis, Dublin, Ireland), a new intrauterine device for contraception. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend use of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) as first-line pregnancy prevention. LARC efficacy rates are similar to those of sterilization, with the possibility for quick return of fertility upon removal of the device. Despite benefits and recommendations for this form of contraception, access and high cost remain barriers to use. Liletta is the first lower-cost option for intrauterine contraception. Available to qualified clinics and health centers at a reduced rate, this device may increase availability and decrease the overall cost to women who desire intrauterine contraception.

Three-year efficacy and safety of a new 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system.

OBJECTIVE: To assess 3-year data on the efficacy and safety of a new 52-mg levonorgestrel intrauterine contraceptive (LNG20) designed for up to 7 years use. STUDY DESIGN: Nulliparous and parous women aged 16-45 years at enrollment with regular menstrual cycles and requesting contraception were enrolled in an open-label, partially randomized trial to evaluate LNG20. The primary outcome was pregnancy rate for women aged 16-35 years calculated as the Pearl Index. Women aged 36-45 years received LNG20 for safety evaluation only. All participants had in-person or phone follow-up approximately every 3 months during the study. RESULTS: A total of 1600 women aged 16-35 years and 151 women aged 36-45 years agreed to LNG20 placement, including 1011 (57.7%) nulliparous and 438 (25.1%) obese women. Successful placement occurred in 1714 (97.9%) women. Six pregnancies occurred, four of which were ectopic. The Pearl Index for LNG20 was 0.15 (95% CI 0.02-0.55) through Year 1, 0.26 (95% CI 0.10-0.57) through Year 2, and 0.22 (95% CI 0.08-0.49) through Year 3. The cumulative life-table pregnancy rate was 0.55 (95% CI 0.24-1.23) through 3 years. Expulsion was reported in 62 (3.5%) participants, most (50 [80.6%]) during the first year of use. Of women who discontinued LNG20 and desired pregnancy, 86.8% conceived spontaneously within 12 months. Pelvic infection was diagnosed in 10 (0.6%) women. Only 26 (1.5%) LNG20 users discontinued due to bleeding complaints. CONCLUSION: The LNG20 intrauterine system is highly effective and safe over 3 years of use in nulliparous and parous women. IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT: A new 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system is effective and safe for nulliparous and parous women for at least 3 years.