Neoadjuvant therapy bridging percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) lobectomy: a retrospective study.

Background: Currently, there is no unified standard for the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and the treatments have their own advantages and disadvantages. Thus, this study aimed to analyze the safety and feasibility of neoadjuvant therapy during the dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) period before surgery in patients with NSCLC coexisting with CAD after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) treatment. Methods: We retrospectively included 13 patients with T2aN0M0 (stage IB) NSCLC who also had concomitant CAD. After PCI treatment, neoadjuvant targeted or immunotherapy was administered based on the type of lung cancer, and the effects on treatment and impact on surgery were observed. Results: The objective response rate (ORR) after neoadjuvant treatment in 13 patients was 53.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 25.1-80.8%], and the disease control rate (DCR) reached 100%. Ten patients (76.9%) experienced adverse events (AEs) ≤ grade 2. All patients underwent standard VATS lobectomy with lymph node dissection. One case (7.7%) required conversion to open thoracotomy, and all cases achieved R0 resection. The median operative time was 150 [interquartile range (IQR) 125-250] minutes, median intraoperative blood loss was 180 (IQR 150-235) mL, median postoperative drainage tube placement time was 4 (IQR 3-5) days, median total drainage volume was 1,310 (IQR 780-1,705) mL, and the median postoperative hospitalization was 7 (IQR 7-8) days. One patient (7.7%) experienced rapid atrial fibrillation. No deaths occurred. Postoperative pathological evaluation in three cases achieved major pathological response (MPR) (23.1%, 95% CI: 5-53.8%), with two cases achieving pathological complete response (pCR) (15.4%, 95% CI: 1.9-45.4%). Conclusions: The study presents initial evidence suggesting for the safety and feasibility of performing PCI treatment followed by neoadjuvant therapy during the DAPT period for patients with T2aN0M0 (IB) stage NSCLC coexisting with CAD. This approach presents a potential treatment option to control the disease while eliminating concerns about tumor progression and metastasis.

Laparoscopic caudate lobe resections: How I do it: tips and pitfalls (with video).

BACKGROUND: The caudate lobe (S1) of the liver, due to its deep central position, presents a formidable challenge for laparoscopic resection. Historical skepticism about laparoscopic approaches has been overshadowed by advancements in technology and technique, with recent studies showing comparable outcomes to open surgery. METHODS: This paper introduces the "Easy First" technique and the Sextet strategies for laparoscopic hepatic caudate lobectomy. The strategies include meticulous preoperative planning, optimal trocar placement, and team positioning, tailored to the anatomical complexities of the caudate lobe. RESULTS: With a 0% conversion and mortality rate, our series demonstrates the safety of the "Easy First" technique. The Sextet strategies have been instrumental in navigating the technical challenges, emphasizing the importance of patient selection and surgeon expertise. CONCLUSION: The "Easy First" technique, with its structured approach and the Sextet strategies, offers a replicable method for laparoscopic caudate lobectomy. It underscores the need for stringent patient selection, advanced technical skill, and high-volume center expertise to ensure procedural success and patient safety.

Outcomes of right sleeve lower lobectomy vs. lower bilobectomy for lung malignancies.

OBJECTIVES: Lower bilobectomy (LBL) leaves a residual pleural space potentially associated with adverse postoperative outcomes. In selected patients, right sleeve lower lobectomy (RSLL) with anastomosis between the middle lobe bronchus and intermediate bronchus is feasible. The outcomes of RSLL and LBL have not been compared. The aim of this study was to compare post-operative and long-term outcomes of RSLL and LBL in patients with lung cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively included patients managed by RSLL or LBL at our referral chest-surgery institution between 2001 and 2019. Post-operative complications and mortality were compared. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted to compare overall and disease-free survival rates. RESULTS: We identified 23 patients with RSLL and 96 with LBL. Postoperative mortality was 9 % after RSLL and 5 % after LBL (p = 0.41). Bronchial fistula developed in 3 (13 %) RSLL patients and 6 (6 %) LBL patients (p = 0.23). Pleural space complications were significantly less common after RSLL (4/23 [17 %] vs. 45/96 [47 %], p = 0.03). Long-term vital capacity was significantly higher in the RSLL group (91 % vs. 64 %, p < 0.01). Five-year survival did not differ significantly between groups (84 % vs. 72 %, p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: RSLL was associated with similar postoperative mortality and long-term survival compared to LBL. However, pleural space complications were less common and lung function was better after RSLL than after LBL. When feasible, RSLL may deserve preference over LBL in patients with lung cancer managed at highly experienced centres.

Comparison of 5-Year Survival and Disease Recurrence After Trisegmentectomy or Left Upper Lobectomy: A Propensity Score Analysis of the National GEVATS Database.

INTRODUCTION: Trisegmentectomy, or resection of the upper subdivision of the left upper lobe with preservation of the lingula, is considered by some authors to be equivalent to right upper lobectomy with middle lobe preservation. Our objective was to compare survival and recurrence after trisegmentectomy versus left upper lobectomy procedures registered in the Spanish Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery group (GEVATS) database. METHODS: We compared mortality, survival and recurrence in patients with left upper lobectomy or trisegmentectomy after propensity score matching for the following variables: age, smoking habit, tumor size, histologic type, radiological density of tumor, surgical access, forced expiratory volume in one second, diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide, hypertension, chronic heart failure, ischemic heart disease, arrhythmia, stroke, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes and pre-surgery nodal status by positron emission tomography/computed tomography. RESULTS: A total of 540 left upper lobectomies and 83 trisegmentectomies were registered in the GEVATS database. After propensity score matching, 134 left upper lobectomies and 67 trisegmentectomies were selected. Survival outcomes were similar, but differences were found for recurrence (21.5% for trisegmentectomies vs. 35.4% for left upper lobectomies, p=0.05). Moreover, the recurrence patterns differed, with the lobectomy group showing a greater tendency to distant dissemination. CONCLUSIONS: Trisegmentectomy and left upper lobectomy show similar 5-year survival rates. In our database, recurrence after trisegmentectomy was lower than after left upper lobectomy, while the recurrence pattern differed among the 2 surgical approaches, with a greater tendency to distant metastasis after left upper lobectomy.

Functional frontal lobectomy in the surgical treatment of pharmacoresistant frontal lobe epilepsy: how I do it.

BACKGROUND: Frontal lobe epilepsy is pharmacoresistant in 30% of cases, constituting 10-20% of epilepsy surgeries. For cases of no lesional epilepsy (negative MRI), frontal lobectomy is a crucial treatment, historically involving Frontal Anatomical Lobectomy (AFL) with a 33.3% complication risk and 55.7% seizure control. METHODS: We describe Frontal Functional Lobectomy (FFL), in which the boundaries are defined on the patient's functional cortico-subcortical areas, recognized with advanced intraoperative technologies such as tractography and navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS). CONCLUSIONS: The FFL allows for a broader resection with a lower rate of postoperative complications than the AFL.

[Cervicothoracotomy for right upper sleeve lobectomy with carinal resection in the treatment of central lung cancer]. / Kombinirovannyi tserviko-torakotomnyi dostup dlya vypolneniya verkhnei lobektomii sprava s rezektsiei bifurkatsii trakhei pri tsentral'nom rake legkogo.

We demonstrated successful treatment of patients with complicated central lung cancer, who underwent right upper sleeve lobectomy with carinal resection. We have used the following options for carinal reconstruction: anastomosis of trachea with the left main bronchus and anastomosis of intermediate bronchus with the left main bronchus (clinical case No. 1) or with trachea (clinical case No. 2). Cervicothoracotomy provided correct N-staging and mobilization of trachea with left main bronchus. This approach provided compliance with oncological principles of surgical treatment of lung cancer and significantly reduced tension of anastomosis. These aspects are important for satisfactory immediate functional and oncological results after right upper sleeve lobectomy with carinal resection.

Clinical and biological effects of different energetic surgical devices currently used for mini-invasive anatomical lung resections for the treatment of NSCLC: a prospective interventional study.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to compare three commonly used energy devices for dissection during Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) lobectomy: monopolar hook, advanced bipolar, and ultrasonic device, in terms of duration of the surgical procedure and clinical intra- and post-operative outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective single-center study, 75 patients undergoing VATS lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer between January 2022 and May 2023 were enrolled and divided into 3 groups based on the device used during the surgical procedure (Group 1: Ultrasonic Device, Group 2: Advanced Bipolar, Group 3: Monopolar Hook). The duration of the surgical procedure, daily pleural fluid production, post-operative pain, length of hospital stay, and occurrence of post-operative complications were compared for each group. In a subgroup of 20 patients (10 from Group 1 and 10 from Group 3), concentrations of inflammatory cytokines in pleural fluid at 3 h and 48 h post-surgery were analyzed. RESULTS: Pleural fluid production on the first and second post-operative days was significantly lower in patients treated with the Ultrasonic device compared to the other two groups (p < 0.001). The duration of the surgical procedure was significantly shorter when using the Ultrasonic device (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in length of hospital stay (p = 0.975), pain on the first and second post-operative days (p = 0.147 and p = 0.755, respectively), and blood hemoglobin levels on the first post-operative day (p = 0.709) and at discharge (p = 0.795). No differences were observed in terms of post-operative complications, although the incidence of post-operative cardiac arrhythmias was borderline significant (p = 0.096), with no cases of arrhythmias recorded in Group 1. IL-10 levels in pleural fluid of patients in Group 3 peaked at 3 h post-surgery, with a significant reduction at 48 h (p = 0.459). DISCUSSION: The use of the ultrasonic device during VATS lobectomy may reduce pleural fluid production and shorten the duration of the surgical procedure compared to using a monopolar hook or advanced bipolar device. The choice of energy device may influence the local inflammatory response, although further studies are needed to confirm these results.

The Surgical Outcome of Standard Lobectomy Versus Sleeve Lobectomy in Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Propensity Score Matching.

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we aimed to compare the patients who underwent standard or sleeve lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer in terms of postoperative outcomes, prognostic factors and overall survival. METHODS: Between January 2002 and January 2020, the patients with squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma, who underwent standard lobectomy or sleeve lobectomy by thoracotomy in our clinic were retrospectively analyzed. Standard and sleeve groups were compared after propensity score matching in terms of age, comorbidity, T status, N status and pathological stage. Primary outcomes were morbitidy and mortality, while secondary outcome was overall survival. RESULTS: The study included 476 patients and sleeve lobectomy was performed in 196 (41.1%) patients. Multivariable analysis revealed that age over 61 years (p = 0.003 and p = 0.005, respectively), forced expiratory volume in first second below 84% (p = 0.013 and p = 0.205, respectively) and the presence of perineural invasion (p = 0.052 and p = 0.001, respectively) were poor prognostic factors in the standard lobectomy and the sleeve groups. The propensity matching analysis included 276 patients (138 sleeve lobectomy and 138 standard lobectomy). Complications were occured in 96 (69.6%) and 92 (66.7%) patients in the standard and sleeve groups, respectively (p = 0.605). Three (2.2%) patients in the standard group and five (3.6%) patients in the sleeve group died in 90 days postoperatively (p = 0.723). CONCLUSIONS: Bronchial sleeve lobectomy is a safe procedure that can be applied in oncologically suitable cases without causing higher mortality than standard lobectomies.

NLR, MLR, and PLR are adverse prognostic variables for sleeve lobectomy within non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The goal of the research was to examine the value of peripheral blood indicators in forecasting survival and recurrence among people suffering central-type non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing sleeve lobectomy (SL). METHODS: Clinical information was gathered from 146 individuals suffering from NSCLC who had SL at our facility between January 2014 and May 2023. Peripheral blood neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR) levels were determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to establish the threshold points. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was employed to evaluate the prognostic value of different groupings, and both univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards model (referred to as COX) were performed. RESULTS: The disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) cutoff values were carried out via ROC analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed notable differences in OS for NLR (≥2.196 vs. <2.196, p = 0.0009), MLR (≥0.2763 vs. <0.2763, p = 0.0018), and PLR (≥126.11 vs. <126.11, p = 0.0354). Similarly, significant differences in DFS were observed for NLR (≥3.010 vs. <3.010, p = 0.0005), MLR (≥0.2708 vs. <0.2708, p = 0.0046), and PLR (≥126.11 vs. <126.11, p = 0.0028). Univariate Cox analysis showed that NLR (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.469; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.416-4.306, p < 0.001), MLR (HR: 2.192, 95% CI: 1.319-3.643, p = 0.002) and PLR (HR: 1.696, 95% CI: 1.029-2.795, p = 0.038) were correlated alongside OS. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that NLR (HR: 2.036, 95% CI: 1.072-3.864, p = 0.030) was a separate OS risk variable. Additionally, the pN stage (HR: 3.163, 95% CI: 1.660-6.027, p < 0.001), NLR (HR: 2.530, 95% CI: 1.468-4.360, p < 0.001), MLR (HR: 2.229, 95% CI: 1.260-3.944, p = 0.006) and PLR (HR: 2.249, 95% CI: 1.300-3.889, p = 0.004) were connected to DFS. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that pN stage (HR: 3.098, 95% CI: 1.619-5.928, p < 0.001) was a separate DFS risk variable. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates that NLR, MLR, and PLR play a convenient and cost-effective role in predicting survival and recurrence among individuals alongside central-type NSCLC having SL.

The anterior sylvian point as a reliable landmark for the anterior temporal lobectomy in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: technical note, case series, and cadaveric dissection.

Introduction: Mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) is one of the most prevalent forms of focal epilepsy in surgical series, particularly among adults. Over the decades, different surgical strategies have been developed to address drug-resistant epilepsy while safeguarding neurological and cognitive functions. Among these strategies, anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL), involving the removal of the temporal pole and mesial temporal structures, has emerged as a widely employed technique. Numerous modifications have been proposed to mitigate the risks associated with aphasia, cognitive issues, and visual field defects. Methods: Our approach is elucidated through intraoperative and cadaveric dissections, complemented by neuroradiological and cadaveric measurements of key anatomical landmarks. A retrospective analysis of patients with drug-resistant MTLE who were treated using our ATL technique at IRCCS Neuromed (Pozzilli) is presented. Results: A total of 385 patients were treated with our ATL subpial technique anatomically focused on the anterior Sylvian point (ASyP). The mean FU was 9.9 ± 5.4 years (range 1-24). In total, 84%of patients were free of seizures during the last follow-up, with no permanent neurological deficits. Transient defects were as follows: aphasia in 3% of patients, visual field defects in 2% of patients, hemiparesis in 2% of patients, and cognitive/memory impairments in 0.8% of patients. In cadaveric dissections, the ASyP was found at a mean distance from the temporal pole of 3.4 ± 0.2 cm (range 3-3.8) at the right side and 3.5 ± 0.2 cm (3.2-3.9) at the left side. In neuroimaging, the ASyP resulted anterior to the temporal horn tip in all cases at a mean distance of 3.2 ± 0.3 mm (range 2.7-3.6) at the right side and 3.5 ± 0.4 mm (range 2.8-3.8) at the left side. Discussion: To the best of our knowledge, this study first introduces the ASyP as a reliable and reproducible cortical landmark to perform the ATL to overcome the patients' variabilities, the risk of Meyer's loop injury, and the bias of intraoperative measurements. Our findings demonstrate that ASyP can be a safe cortical landmark that is useful in MTLE surgery because it is constantly present and is anterior to risky temporal regions such as temporal horn and language networks.

Intermediate-sized follicular thyroid cancer surgical trends before and after the 2015 American thyroid association guideline changes.

In 2015, the ATA updated the guidelines to advocate for a lobectomy for tumors <1.0 â€‹cm and total thyroidectomy for tumors >4.0 â€‹cm. Treatment for tumors of intermediate size 1.0-4.0 â€‹cm is dependent on high-risk characteristics. There is limited research comparing the impact of the updated ATA guidelines on clinical practice on intermediate-sized tumors. In this study, the impact of the 2015 ATA guidelines on the surgical treatment of intermediated-sized FTC will be evaluated using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. A total of 9983 patients were included; 7769 patients (74.1 â€‹%) were diagnosed pre-ATA guidelines and 2709 patients (25.9 â€‹%) post-ATA guidelines. The mean rate of lobectomy for intermediate-sized tumors was 22.1 â€‹% which increased to 33.4 â€‹% post-ATA updates. The results of the logistic regression showed the rate of lobectomy increased significantly in the post-ATA changes period (p â€‹< â€‹0.001). Future research could benefit from evaluating how these trends impact patient outcome measures.

Systematic review of robotic video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery total pneumonectomy for lung cancer.

Introduction: This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the literature on robotic video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) pneumonectomy. Aim: To evaluate its effectiveness and safety in treating various lung diseases. Methods: A thorough search of electronic databases was conducted, and 25 studies encompassing 1,650 patients were included in the review. Results: The review found that robotic VATS pneumonectomy surgery is a safe and effective alternative to traditional open surgery for the treatment of various lung diseases, particularly early-stage lung cancer. The surgery is associated with shorter hospitalizations, less blood loss, and less postoperative pain when compared to traditional open surgery. Conclusions: However, long-term survival outcomes were not significantly different between robotic and open surgery. The review also highlights the need for further studies to determine the optimal use of robotic VATS pneumonectomy surgery in different clinical scenarios and to determine whether the benefits of this technique outweigh the costs. Overall, this systematic review suggests that robotic VATS pneumonectomy surgery is a safe and effective technique that can be used as an alternative to traditional open surgery.

Quality of lymph node dissection and early recurrence in robotic versus thoracoscopic lobectomy for stage N1-2 non-small cell lung cancer: Eleven-year real-world data from a high-volume center.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of lymph node dissection (LND) and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted (RL) versus video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy (VL) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with nodal involvement remains controversial. This study aims to compare LND quality and early recurrence (ER) rate between RL and VL for stage N1-2 NSCLC patients based on eleven-year real-world data from a high-volume center. METHODS: Pathologic stage IIB-IIIB (T1-3N1-2) NSCLC patients undergoing RL or VL in Shanghai Chest Hospital from 2010 to 2021 were retrospectively reviewed from a prospectively maintained database. Propensity-score matching (PSM, 1:4 RL versus VL) was performed to mitigate baseline differences. LND quality was evaluated by adequate (≥16) LND and nodal upstaging rates. ER was defined as recurrence occurring within 24 months post-surgery. RESULTS: Out of 1578 cases reviewed, PSM yielded 200 RL and 800 VL cases. Without compromising perioperative outcomes, RL assessed more N1 and N2 LNs and N1 stations, and led to higher incidences of adequate LND (58.5 % vs. 42.0 %, p < 0.001) and nodal upstaging (p = 0.026), compared to VL. Notably, RL improved perioperative outcomes for patients undergoing adequate LND than VL. Finally, RL notably reduced ER rate (22.0 % vs. 29.6 %, p = 0.032), especially LN ER rate (15.0 % vs. 21.5 %, p = 0.041), and prolonged disease-free survival (DFS; hazard ratio = 0.837, p = 0.040) compared with VL. Further subgroup analysis of ER and DFS within the cN1-2-stage cohort verified this survival benefit. CONCLUSIONS: RL surpasses VL in enhancing LND quality, reducing ER rates, and improving perioperative outcomes when adequate LND is performed for stage N1-2 NSCLC patients.

Feasibility and Comparative Prognosis of Segmentectomy vs. Lobectomy in Centrally Located Small and Solid Dominant cN0 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the feasibility of segmentectomy in patients with central, whole tumor size ≤2 cm and radiologically solid-dominant cN0 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 1240 patients who underwent lobectomy or segmentectomy for small and radiologically solid-dominant cN0 NSCLC between January 2010 and December 2022. The inclusion criteria encompassed centrally located tumors defined as tumors located in the inner two-thirds of the pulmonary parenchyma. Propensity score matching was applied to balance the baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Among the 299 eligible patients, no significant differences in recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were observed between the segmentectomy (n = 121) and lobectomy (n = 178) groups (P = .794 and .577, respectively). After propensity score matching, no significant differences in hilar and mediastinal lymph node upstaging were found among the 93 matched patients (P = 1.00) and locoregional recurrence was comparable between those who underwent segmentectomy (n = 4) and lobectomy (n = 4). RFS and OS did not significantly differ between the two groups (P = .700 and .870, respectively). Propensity score-adjusted multivariable Cox analysis for RFS and OS indicated that segmentectomy was not an independent prognostic factor (RFS: hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.43-1.85; P = .755; OS: hazard ratio, 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-3.14; P = .860). CONCLUSIONS: Segmentectomy may be a viable treatment option with local control and prognosis comparable to that of lobectomy in appropriately selected patients with central, small (≤2 cm), and radiologically solid-dominant NSCLC.

Hypothyroidism after hemithyroidectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of hypothyroidism following hemithyroidectomy and risk factors associated with its occurrence are not completely understood. This systematic review investigated the incidence and risk factors for hypothyroidism, thyroxine supplementation following hemithyroidectomy as well as the course of post-operative hypothyroidism, including the time to hypothyroidism and incidence of transient hypothyroidism. METHODS: Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane library for studies reporting the incidence of hypothyroidism or thyroxine supplementation following hemithyroidectomy. RESULTS: Sixty-six studies were eligible for inclusion: 36 reported risk factors, and 27 reported post-operative course of hypothyroidism. Median follow-up was 25.2 months. The pooled incidence of hypothyroidism was 29% (95% CI, 25-34%; P<0.001). Transient hypothyroidism occurred in 34% of patients (95% CI, 21-47%; P<0.001). The pooled incidence of thyroxine supplementation was 23% (95% CI, 19-27%; P<0.001), overt hypothyroidism 4% (95% CI, 2-6%, P<0.001). Risk factors for development of hypothyroidism included pre-operative thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) (WMD, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.75-0.98; P<0.001), TSH ≥ 2 mIU/L (RR, 2.87; 95% CI, 2.43-3.40; P<0.001), female sex (RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.08-1.32; P=0.007), age (WMD, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.20-3.38; P<0.001), right sided hemithyroidectomy (RR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.10-1.65, P=0.003), the presence of autoantibodies anti-TPO (RR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.49-2.48; P<0.001), anti-Tg (RR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.40-1.88; P<0.001), and Hashimoto's thyroiditis (RR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.57-2.68; P=0.001). CONCLUSION: A significant number of patients will develop hypothyroidism or require thyroxine following hemithyroidectomy. An awareness of patient risk factors and postoperative thyroid function course will assist in counselling patients on their risk profile and guiding management.

Segmentectomy versus lobectomy for ground-glass opacity dominant cT1N0 invasive lung adenocarcinoma.

Background: The Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) 1211 suggested that segmentectomy should be considered as standard treatment for clinical T1N0 (cT1N0) ground glass opacity (GGO). However, over half of patients in JCOG1211 had pre-/minimal invasive adenocarcinoma. This study aims to retrospectively investigate the long-term survival of GGO featured cT1N0 invasive lung adenocarcinoma undergoing segmentectomy or lobectomy. Methods: This study screened patients with primary cT1N0 lung adenocarcinoma who received segmentectomy or lobectomy from 2010-2020. Prior computed tomography (CT) scans before surgery of all patients were reviewed and the inclusion was confirmed according to tumor diameter and consolidation tumor ratio (CTR). GGO nodules between 2-3 cm with CTR ≤0.5 or ≤2 cm with CTR between 0.25-0.5 were finally included. Patients with pathologically diagnosed pre-/minimally invasive lung adenocarcinoma were excluded. Long-term survivals between segmentectomy group and lobectomy group were compared after propensity score matching (PSM). Recurrence and postoperative complication events were also analyzed. Results: In total, 617 patients were enrolled, 159 received segmentectomy and 458 received lobectomy. Clinicopathological characteristics were well distributed between two groups. With a median follow-up time of 61.1 months (IQR: 42.3-71.7 months), after PSM, the 5-year overall survival rate was 98.8% (97.9-99.6%) for lobectomy and 99.3% (98.2-99.8%) for segmentectomy (P=0.42), the 5-year relapse-free survival rate was 95.3% (92.2-97.6%) for lobectomy and 95.2% for segmentectomy (92.3-98.7%) (P=0.81). The proportion of recurrence was 4.1% for lobectomy and 4.4% for segmentectomy (P=0.89). The proportion of grade 2 and above early postoperative complications was 9.6% for lobectomy and 8.8% for segmentectomy (P=0.86). Conclusions: For cT1N0 GGO featured invasive lung adenocarcinoma (2 cm < tumor diameter ≤3 cm, CTR ≤0.5 or tumor diameter ≤2 cm, 0.25< CTR ≤0.5), postoperative outcomes between segmentectomy group and lobectomy group were comparable. Concerning minimally invasive surgical strategy, segmentectomy should be confirmed as the standard surgical approach.

Predicting complication risks after sleeve lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer.

Background: Sleeve lobectomy is a challenging procedure with a high risk of postoperative complications. To facilitate surgical decision-making and optimize perioperative treatment, we developed risk stratification models to quantify the probability of postoperative complications after sleeve lobectomy. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical features of 691 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who underwent sleeve lobectomy between July 2016 and December 2019. Logistic regression models were trained and validated in the cohort to predict overall complications, major complications, and specific minor complications. The impact of specific complications in prognostic stratification was explored via the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Of 691 included patients, 232 (33.5%) developed complications, including 35 (5.1%) and 197 (28.5%) patients with major and minor complications, respectively. The models showed robust discrimination, yielding an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of 0.853 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.705-0.885] for predicting overall postoperative complication risk and 0.751 (95% CI: 0.727-0.762) specifically for major complication risks. Models predicting minor complications also achieved good performance, with AUCs ranging from 0.78 to 0.89. Survival analyses revealed a significant association between postoperative complications and poor prognosis. Conclusions: Risk stratification models could accurately predict the probability and severity of complications in NSCLC patients following sleeve lobectomy, which may inform clinical decision-making for future patients.