Reducing Chronic Spine Pain in an Adult Male by Decreasing Lumbar Scoliosis and Increasing Cervical Lordosis Using Chiropractic BioPhysics® Protocols: A 26-Month Follow-Up Case Report.

We present a case report of a patient suffering from chronic low back pain (CLBP) and chronic non-specific neck pain (CNSNP), both of which were caused and complicated by a physically demanding occupation, a history of mixed martial arts, and lumbar scoliosis. Improvements in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and radiographic findings were observed following conservative spine rehabilitation. The patient, a 34-year-old male, had experienced chronic spine pain, particularly CLBP and CNSNP, for several years. He reported severe pain and increasing disability after a recent neck injury sustained while practicing jiu-jitsu. Radicular pain, along with numbness and tingling, was noted in the right upper extremity, extending to the first three digits, and there were also altered sensations and temperature changes in both feet. He described sharp, pinching mid-back pain and worsening disability due to the persistent pain, which led him to seek manual manipulative chiropractic spine therapy, though he reported little benefit from it. The patient had relied on over-the-counter pain medications for many years without achieving long-term pain and disability relief, and these medications were no longer used following treatment. Chiropractic BioPhysics® (CBP®) spinal structural rehabilitation protocols were used to improve coronal and sagittal balance, as well as paraspinal muscular strength, addressing posture, mobility, and related aspects. These protocols include postural exercises, postural Mirror Image® traction, and postural spinal manipulative therapy. All PROs improved, with a near resolution of all initial symptoms of chronic spine pain. Outcomes measured included disability indices and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) indicators. Radiographic parameter improvements were significant, demonstrating improved coronal and sagittal balance as a result of the treatment. Following 30 in-office treatments, administered three times per week for 10 weeks, initial outcomes were reassessed. The patient then received 13 in-office treatments periodically over one year, and all initial outcomes were repeated. The improvements remained stable over time. A 26-month follow-up found that the improvements were sustained over a very long period without additional treatment after the 13-month examination. Chronic spine pain, specifically CLBP and CNSNP, is a significant source of suffering and contributes substantially to the global burden of disease. Improvement in HRQoLs, PROs, and objective spine parameters are desirable clinical outcomes. Our case report documents objective improvement in lumbar scoliosis and spine pain, which is rare in conservative studies. This successful treatment of chronic pain with long-term follow-up contributes to the growing evidence supporting conservative, non-surgical treatments for CNSNP and CLBP. Successful management of chronic spine pain was observed in a patient undergoing CBP® treatment. The treatment was designed to address abnormal sagittal and coronal postural balance and radiographic abnormalities indicating spinal misalignment and reassess progress in PROs, as well as objective and subjective HRQoL measures, both following treatment and 13 months later. However, larger studies are needed to draw firm conclusions regarding the efficacy of this treatment for chronic pain.

Impact of preoperative age-adjusted sagittal imbalance on radiographic and clinical outcomes following 1-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis.

OBJECTIVE: Prior studies investigating the use of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) for treatment of degenerative lumbar conditions and concomitant sagittal deformity have not stratified patients by preoperative pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL) mismatch, which is the earliest parameter to deteriorate in mild sagittal deformity. Thus, the aim of the present study was to determine the impact of preoperative PI-LL mismatch on clinical outcomes and sagittal balance restoration among patients undergoing MI-TLIF for degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). METHODS: Consecutive adult patients undergoing primary 1-level MI-TLIF between April 2017 and April 2022 for DS with ≥ 6 months radiographic follow-up were included. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) included the Oswestry Disability Index, visual analog scale (VAS), 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System at preoperative, early postoperative (< 6 months), and late postoperative (≥ 6 months) time points. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for PROMs was also evaluated. Radiographic parameters included PI, LL, pelvic tilt (PT), and sagittal vertical axis (SVA). Patients were categorized into balanced and unbalanced groups based on preoperative PI-LL mismatch according to age-adjusted alignment goals. Changes in radiographic parameters and PROMs were evaluated. RESULTS: Eighty patients were included (L4-5 82.5%, grade I spondylolisthesis 82.5%, unbalanced 58.8%). Mean clinical and radiographic follow-up were 17.0 and 8.3 months, respectively. The average preoperative PI-LL was 18.8° in the unbalanced group and -3.3° in the balanced group. Patients with preoperative PI-LL mismatch had significantly worse preoperative PT (26.2° vs 16.4°, p < 0.001) and SVA (53.2 vs 9.0 mm, p = 0.001) compared with balanced patients. Patients with preoperative PI-LL mismatch also showed significantly worse PI-LL (16.0° vs 0.54°, p < 0.001), PT (25.9° vs 18.7°, p < 0.001), and SVA (49.4 vs 22.8 mm, p = 0.013) at long-term follow-up. No significant radiographic improvement was observed among unbalanced patients. All patients demonstrated significant improvements in all PROMs (p < 0.05) except for SF-12 mental component score. Achievement of MCID for VAS back score was significantly greater among patients with preoperative PI-LL mismatch (85.7% vs 65.5%, p = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Although 1-level MI-TLIF did not restore sagittal alignment in patients with preoperative PI-LL mismatch, patients presenting with DS can expect significant improvement in PROMs following 1-level MI-TLIF regardless of preoperative alignment or extent of correction. Thus, attaining good clinical outcomes in patients with mild sagittal imbalance may not require addressing imbalance directly.

Spinopelvic Parameters in the Elderly: Does Inadequate Correction Portend Worse Outcomes?

Introduction: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of corrective fusion for adult spinal deformity (ASD) in older people using two different sagittal correction goals: the conventional formula of "pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL) mismatch <10°" and an undercorrection strategy based on the range of 10°≤PI-LL≤20°. Methods: A total of 102 consecutive patients (11 male and 91 female patients; mean age, 72.0 years) aged above 65 years with scoliosis >20° or LL<20° who had undergone long-segment fusion from the lower thoracic spine to the pelvis for ASD and had been followed-up for a minimum of two years at our institution since March 2013 were included in this retrospective study. After excluding patients with PI-LL≤-10° on postoperative standing radiographs, the remaining patients were divided into two groups: 31 patients with 10°≤PI-LL≤20° (U group) and 63 patients with -10°

The effects of spinal flexion exposure on lumbar muscle shear modulus and posture.

PURPOSE: Spinal flexion exposure (SFE) leads to alterations in neuromuscular and mechanical properties of the trunk. While several studies reported changes in intrinsic trunk stiffness following SFE, there is a lack of studies evaluating the effects on lumbar muscle shear modulus (SM). Therefore, the aim of our study was to investigate the effects of SFE on lumbar muscle SM and posture. METHODS: Sixteen young volunteers were included in this clinical study. Passive lumbar muscle SM, lumbar lordosis, lumbar flexion range of motion and sitting height were measured prior to and following a 60-min SFE protocol. RESULTS: For SM, our results did not show a significant muscle × time interaction effect (p = 0.40). However, we found increased SM (from 6.75 to 15.43% - all p < 0.02) and maximal lumbar flexion (15.91 ± 10.88%; p < 0.01), whereas lumbar lordosis ( - 7.67 ± 13.97%; p = 0.03) and sitting height ( - 0.57 ± 0.32%; p < 0.01) decreased following SFE. Our results showed no significant correlations between the changes in the included outcome measures (p = 0.10-0.83). CONCLUSION: We hypothesized that increased lumbar muscle SM following SFE might be a compensation for decreased passive stability due to viscoelastic deformations of connective tissues, which are indicated by increased maximal lumbar flexion and decreased sitting height. However, there were no significant correlations between the changes of the included outcome measures, which implies that increased muscle SM and reduced lumbar lordosis are more likely an independent consequence of SFE.

A novel technique for posterior lumbar interbody fusion to obtain a good local lordosis angle: anterior-release posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Herein, we describe a novel posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) technique with annulus fibrosus (AF) release and the use of expandable cages (called "anterior-release PLIF" [ARPLIF]). In this technique, posterior column osteotomy (PCO) and AF release provide excellent intervertebral mobility. AF release involves circumferentially peeling off the AF above or below the endplate between the fixed vertebrae under radiographic guidance without cutting the AF and anterior longitudinal ligament. Subsequently, high-angle variable-angle expandable cages are used to simultaneously expand both sides before inserting the percutaneous pedicle screws and correcting to achieve good local lumbar lordosis. PCO and AF release achieve excellent intervertebral mobility. Intervertebral mobility and simultaneous expansion of both cages disperse the force on the endplates, reducing cage subsidence, and the high-angle cages facilitate high intervertebral angle creation. The novel ARPLIF intervertebral manipulation technique can promote good local lumbar lordosis formation.

Postural asymmetry in low back pain - a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

PURPOSE: Systematic review and meta-analysis to examine common static postural parameters between participants with and without low back pain (LBP). METHODS: Systematic search on the PubMed, CINAHL, Embase and SCOPUS databases using keywords 'posture' and 'low back pain'. Observational studies comparing static postural outcomes (e.g. lumbar lordosis) between participants with and without LBP were included. Two independent reviewers conducted screening, data extraction and quality assessment. Methodological quality was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal tools. RESULTS: Studies included in review = 46 (5,097 LBP; 6,974 controls); meta-analysis = 36 (3,617 LBP; 4,323 controls). Quality of included studies was mixed. Pelvic tilt was statistically significantly higher in participants with LBP compared to controls (n = 23; 2,540 LBP; 3,090 controls; SMD:0.23, 95%CI:0.10,0.35, p < 0.01, I2=72%). Lumbar lordosis and sacral slope may be lower in participants with LBP; pelvic incidence may be higher in this group; both were not statistically significant and the between study heterogeneity was high. Thoracic kyphosis and leg length discrepancy showed no difference between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Lumbopelvic mechanisms may be altered in people with LBP, but no firm conclusions could be made. Pelvic tilt appeared to be increased in participants with LBP. Postural variable measurement needs standardisation. Better reporting of study characteristics is warranted.Implications for rehabilitationLumbo pelvic parameters especially pelvic tilt may be altered in people with low back pain, although no firm conclusion could be made due to the high heterogeneity between studies.Postural assessment within low back pain rehabilitation may therefore require an individualistic approach.

Reliability of the Biomechanical Assessment of the Sagittal Lumbar Spine and Pelvis on Radiographs Used in Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Background: Biomechanical analysis of the sagittal alignment of the lumbar spine and pelvis on radiographs is common in clinical practices including chiropractic, physical therapy, scoliosis-related thoraco-lumbo-sacral orthosis (TLSO) management, orthopedics, and neurosurgery. Of specific interest is the assessment of pelvic morphology and the relationship between angle of pelvic incidence, sacral slope, and lumbar lordosis to pain, disability, and clinical treatment of spine conditions. The current state of the literature on the reliability of common methods quantifying these parameters on radiographs is limited. Methods: The objective of this systematic review is to identify and review the available studies on the reliability of different methods of biomechanical analysis of sagittal lumbo-pelvic parameters used in clinical practice. Our review followed the recommendations of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA). The design of this systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023379873). Results: The search strategy yielded a total of 2387 articles. A total of 1539 articles were screened after deduplication and exclusion by automation tools, leaving 473 full-text articles that were retrieved. After exclusion, 64 articles met the inclusion criteria. The preponderance of the evidence showed good to excellent reliability for biomechanical assessment of sagittal lumbo-pelvic spine alignment. Conclusions: The results of this systematic review of the literature show that sagittal radiographic analysis of spinal biomechanics and alignment of the human lumbo-pelvic spine is a reliable tool for aiding diagnosis and management in clinical settings.

Predictability in Achieving Target Intervertebral Lordosis Using Personalized Interbody Implants.

BACKGROUND: Lumbar lordosis distribution has become a pivotal factor in re-establishing the foundational alignment of the lumbar spine. This can directly influence overall sagittal alignment, leading to improved long-term outcomes for patients. Despite the wide availability of hyperlordotic stock cages intended to achieve optimal postoperative alignment, there is a lack of correlation between the lordotic shape of a cage and the resultant intervertebral alignment. Recently, personalized spine surgery has witnessed significant advancements, including 3D-printed personalized interbody implants, which are customized to the surgeon's treatment and alignment goals. This study evaluates the reliability of 3D-printed patient-specific interbody implants to achieve the planned postoperative intervertebral alignment. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 217 patients with spinal deformity or degenerative conditions. Patients were included if they received 3D-printed personalized interbody implants. The desired intervertebral lordosis (IVL) angle was prescribed into the device design for each personalized interbody (IVL goal). Standing postoperative radiographs were measured, and the IVL offset was calculated as IVL achieved minus IVL goal. RESULTS: In this patient population, 365 personalized interbodies were implanted, including 145 anterior lumbar interbody fusions (ALIFs), 99 lateral lumbar interbody fusions (LLIFs), and 121 transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions. Among the 365 treated levels, IVL offset was 1.1° ± 4.4° (mean ± SD). IVL was achieved within 5° of the plan in 299 levels (81.9%). IVL offset depended on the approach of the lumbar interbody fusion and was achieved within 5° for 85.9% of LLIF, 82.6% of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions and 78.6% of ALIFs. Ten levels (2.7%) missed the planned IVL by >10°. ALIF and LLIF levels in which the plan was missed by more than 5° tended to be overcorrected. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the use of 3D-printed personalized interbody implants to achieve planned sagittal intervertebral alignment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Personalized interbody implants can consistently achieve IVL goals and potentially impact foundational lumbar alignment.

Using machine learning to automatically measure kyphotic and lordotic angle measurements on radiographs for children with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Measuring the kyphotic angle (KA) and lordotic angle (LA) on lateral radiographs is important to truly diagnose children with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. However, it is a time-consuming process to measure the KA because the endplate of the upper thoracic vertebra is normally difficult to identify. To save time and improve measurement accuracy, a machine learning algorithm was developed to automatically extract the KA and LA. The accuracy and reliability of the T1-T12 KA, T5-T12 KA, and L1-L5 LA were reported. A convolutional neural network was trained using 100 radiographs with data augmentation to segment the T1-L5 vertebrae. Sixty radiographs were used to test the method. Accuracy and reliability were reported using the percentage of measurements within clinical acceptance (≤9°), standard error of measurement (SEM), and inter-method intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1). The automatic method detected 95 % (57/60), 100 %, and 100 % for T1-T12 KA, T5-T12 KA, and L1-L5 LA, respectively. The clinical acceptance rate, SEM, and ICC2,1 for T1-T12 KA, T5-T12 KA, and L1-L5 LA were (98 %, 0.80°, 0.91), (75 %, 4.08°, 0.60), and (97 %, 1.38°, 0.88), respectively. The automatic method measured quickly with an average of 4 ± 2 s per radiograph and illustrated how measurements were made on the image, allowing verifications by clinicians.

Preoperative Planning of Lumbar Lordosis for Adult Degenerative Scoliosis Surgery in the Chinese Population.

OBJECTIVE: Pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI-LL) is directly related to poor quality of life in adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) patients. The purpose of the study was to determine the most appropriate postoperative PI-LL value for patients with ADS. METHODS: The medical records of patients with ADS in our department were retrospectively collected. The data included age, sex, body mass index, age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index, osteopenia, length of hospital stay, operative duration, estimated blood loss, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, number of fusion levels, lumbar lordosis, sagittal vertical axis, pelvic incidence, PI-LL, Scoliosis Research Society-22 score, Oswestry Disability Index score, and mechanical complications. RESULTS: A total of 316 patients were enrolled. PI-LL, lumbar lordosis, sagittal vertical axis, Scoliosis Research Society-22 score, Oswestry Disability Index score at the time of last follow-up were 20.7 ± 8.5°, 23.4 ± 14.1°, 4.0 ± 2.1 cm, 3.7 ± 0.9, and 18.1 ± 5.5, respectively. In terms of mechanical complications, 88 patients (27.8%), 34 patients (10.8%), and 19 patients (6.0%) had proximal junctional kyphosis, distal junctional kyphosis, and implant-related complications, respectively. In the fully adjusted model, compared with 0 grade PI-LL group and ++ grade PI-LL group, + grade PI-LL group had the best clinical outcomes and the fewest mechanical complications. The stability of these conclusions was verified in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Optimal PI-LL value should be 10°-20° after corrective surgery in patients with ADS, which is associated with excellent clinical outcomes and lower complication rates. Previous criteria may be at risk of overcorrection, which may lead to proximal junctional kyphosis.

Changes in Alignment at Untreated Vertebral Levels Following Short-Segment Fusion Using Personalized Interbody Cages: Leveraging Personalized Medicine to Reduce the Risk of Reoperation.

BACKGROUND: An abnormal postoperative lordosis distribution index (LDI), which quantifies the ratio between the lordosis at L4 to S1 and the lordosis at L1 to S1, contributes to the development of adjacent segment disease and increased revision rates in patients undergoing short-segment lumbar intervertebral fusions. Incorporating preoperative spinopelvic parameters and LDI into the surgical plan for short-segment fusion is important for guiding alignment restoration and preserving normal preoperative alignment in unfused segments. This study examined changes in LDI, segmental lordosis, and lordosis of the unfused levels in patients treated with personalized interbody cage (PIC) implants. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated radiographic measurements from 111 consecutively treated patients diagnosed with degenerative spinal conditions and treated with a short-segment fusion of L4 to L5, L5 to S1, or L4 to S1 using PIC implant(s) within 6 months of the fusion procedure. Comparisons of intervertebral lordosis for treated and untreated levels as well as LDI pre- and postoperatively were performed. RESULTS: In patients with a preoperative hypolordotic distribution (LDI < 50%), statistically significant increases were found in LDI postoperatively, approaching the normal LDI range (LDI 50%-80%). Likewise, patients with hyperlordotic distribution preoperatively (LDI > 80%) experienced a decrease in LDI postoperatively, trending toward the normal range, although the changes were not statistically significant. Intervertebral lordosis for the L5 to S1 level increased significantly following the placement of a PIC in the normal and hypolordotic LDI groups. Changes in intervertebral lordosis for L5 to S1 were not significant for patients with preoperative hyperlordotic LDI. Reciprocal changes in intervertebral lordosis at L1 to L4 were not observed in any groups. CONCLUSIONS: PIC implants may provide a benefit for patients, particularly those with hypolordotic distributions preoperatively. They have the potential to further improve patient outcomes by helping surgeons to achieve patient-specific lordosis goals, which may help to reduce the risk of adjacent segment disease and revisions in patients undergoing short-segment lumbar intervertebral fusions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Personalized implants can help surgeons achieve patient-specific alignment goals, potentially prevent adjacent segment disease, and reduce long-term reinterventions.

Sacroiliac pain after total hip arthroplasty: a combined analysis of clinical data and three-dimensional imaging in standing and sitting positions.

PURPOSE: Patients frequently complain of low back pain and sacroiliac joint pain (SIP) following total hip arthroplasty (THA). We hypothesized that patients with SIP would display different pelvic incidence (PI) values between standing and relaxed sitting positions, indicative of increased motion in the sacroiliac joints. METHODS: In this retrospective case-control study, 94 patients who underwent unilateral THA and experienced SIP were compared with 94 control patients without SIP. SIP was confirmed through clinical tests and investigated using biplanar imaging in both standing and sitting positions. The key parameters analyzed included PI, sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), and limb length discrepancy (LLD). RESULTS: Patients without SIP showed a mean difference in PI of -1.5° (-8°-5°) between standing-to-sitting positions, whereas those with SIP showed a difference of -3.3° (-12°-0°)(P < 0.0001), indicating more motion in the sacroiliac joint during daily activities in the latter group. Patients with SIP showed smaller change in LL between standing-to-sitting positions (mean:6.3°; range:-8°-27°) compared with those without SIP (mean:9.5°; range:-12°-28°)(P = 0.006). No significant differences were noted in functional leg length between patients with (mean:7 mm; range:0-12 mm) and without SIP (mean:7 mm; range:0-11 mm)(P = 0.973). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed significant sacroiliac joint motion in patients with SIP post-THA, as indicated by PI changes, increased posterior pelvic tilt, and reduced change in the LL. Contrary to common belief, SIP did not correlate with LLD.

Predicting immediate lordosis restoration after anterior lumbar interbody fusion and the effect of posterior column osteotomies.

OBJECTIVES: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) can be combined with posterior column osteotomies (PCOs) to maximize lordotic correction. This study compares radiographic changes in regional and segmental lordosis in patients undergoing ALIF with and without PCOs. METHODS: Patients >18 years old who underwent ALIF at 1 or 2 segments at a single institution (January 2014-July 2020) were included. Preoperative and postoperative radiographic parameters were determined, and a propensity-matched analysis was performed. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients (53 [54%] men) underwent ALIF at 129 levels (mean [SD], 1.3 [0.46] levels; median [range] age, 61 [32-83] years). PCOs were performed in 13 (13%) patients at 19 (15%) segments. PCOs included 13 Schwab grade 1 and 6 grade 2 osteotomies. All measures, including lumbar lordosis, segmental lordosis, disc angle, and neural foramen height, increased significantly after surgery (p≤0.003). In the propensity-matched analysis, PCO was associated with greater increases in lumbar lordosis (14.9° vs. 8.2°, p=0.02), segmental lordosis (14.0° vs. 9.6°, p=0.03), and disc angle (15.0° vs. 10.2°, p=0.046). The change in disc angle more closely approximated the inherent lordosis of the cage when PCO was performed (94% vs. 62%, p=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Performing PCOs and ALIFs significantly increased the radiographic correction of overall and segmental lordosis in the selected patient cohort. The disc angle achieved with ALIF without PCOs was approximately 60% of the cage lordosis. The addition of PCO allowed for greater segmental compression, enabling the disc angle to reach nearly 100% of the inherent interbody cage lordosis.

What is the early fate of adjacent segmental lordosis compensation at L3-4 and L5-S1 following a lateral versus transforaminal lumbar Interbody Fusion at L4-5?

INTRODUCTION: Degenerative spondylolisthesis causes translational and angular malalignment, resulting in a loss of segmental lordosis. This leads to compensatory adjustments in adjacent levels to maintain balance. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) are common techniques at L4-5. This study compares compensatory changes at adjacent L3-4 and L5-S1 levels six months post LLIF versus TLIF for grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis at L4-5. METHODS: A retrospective study included patients undergoing L4-5 LLIF or TLIF with posterior pedicle screw instrumentation (no posterior osteotomy) for grade 1 spondylolisthesis. Pre-op and 6-month post-op radiographs measured segmental lordosis (L3-L4, L4-L5, L5-S1), lumbar lordosis (LL), and pelvic incidence (PI), along with PI-LL mismatch. Multiple regressions were used for hypothesis testing. RESULTS: 113 patients (61 LLIF, 52 TLIF) were studied. TLIF showed less change in L4-5 lordosis (mean = 1.04°, SD = 4.34) compared to LLIF (mean = 4.99°, SD = 5.53) (p = 0.003). L4-5 angle changes didn't correlate with L3-4 changes, and no disparity between LLIF and TLIF was found (all p > 0.16). In LLIF, greater L4-5 lordosis change predicted reduced compensatory L5-S1 lordosis (p = 0.04), while no significant relationship was observed in TLIF patients (p = 0.12). CONCLUSION: LLIF at L4-5 increases lordosis at the operated level, with compensatory decrease at L5-S1 but not L3-4. This reciprocal loss at adjacent L5-S1 may explain inconsistent improvement in lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) post L4-5 fusion.

Resolution of Sporadic Hemiplegic Migraine by Correcting a Cervical Spine Kyphosis Utilizing the Chiropractic BioPhysics® (CBP®) Technique: A Case Report With Long-Term Follow-Up.

A 19-year-old male suffered from sporadic hemiplegic migraine (SHM) for several years and experienced significant pain and disability with sensory and motor disturbances during the migraine headaches. Weakness, abnormal vision, abnormal sensation, one-sided disabling motor weakness, and other signs of SHM were diagnosed. The patient had received previous physical therapy, chiropractic and over-the-counter medications, as well as migraine-specific prescriptions without lasting improvements. Chiropractic BioPhysics® (CBP®) spinal structural rehabilitation protocols were used to increase cervical lordosis and improve cervical muscular strength, mobility, and posture. These protocols include spine-specific prescriptions for Mirror Image® postural exercises, traction, and spinal manipulative therapy. After 24 treatments over eight weeks, all subjective and objective outcomes improved dramatically with a near resolution of all initial symptoms of SHM. There were a significant increase in cervical lordosis and a reduction in forward head posture. The neck disability index improved from 26% to 6%, and all pain scores for all regions improved following treatment. A 10-month follow-up exam showed the outcomes were maintained. SHM is rare and debilitating, is part of the global burden of disease, and is a major cause of disability in the world. Reports of successful conservative and non-conservative long-term treatments for SHM are rare, and there are no clinical trials showing successful treatments for SHM. This successful case demonstrates preliminary evidence that CBP spinal structural rehabilitation may serve as a treatment option for SHM. Future studies are needed to replicate the findings from this case.

Harmony between spinopelvic mismatch and sagittal hip alignment contributes to upright standing in females: a cross-sectional study.

Background: In upright standing, spinopelvic mismatch is compensated by hip extension. However, few studies have investigated the reciprocal relationship between the sagittal alignment of the hip joints and spinopelvic mismatch during upright standing in humans. Our study aims to investigate (I) the relationship between spinopelvic mismatch and hip extension and (II) whether insufficient hip extension against spinopelvic mismatch, i.e., pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL), affects trunk inclination in upright standing. Methods: This study was a retrospective cross-sectional study. We included 398 consecutive female patients treated for osteoporosis at our outpatient department between November 2017 and June 2022. Patients with any of the following were excluded from the study: (I) those whose plain whole-spine radiographs did not cover the femurs, (II) those with fractures in the vertebrae or lower extremities, (III) those with a history of surgery of the spine or of the lower extremities, (IV) those with scoliosis with a Cobb angle ≥10° in the anteroposterior radiograph, and (V) those with transitional vertebrae. Sixty-two patients were divided into normal and malalignment groups based on their sagittal spinal alignment. The patients underwent plain whole-spine radiography as a routine examination. A linear approximation between the pelvic femoral angle (PFA), representing hip extension, and PI-LL was obtained in both groups. The optimal PFA of each patient was obtained by substituting the PI-LL into the linear approximation of the normal group. The difference between the optimal and measured PFA was defined as the ΔPFA for each patient. The correlation between the ΔPFA and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) was evaluated in both groups. Results: The PFA and PI-LL were correlated in both groups. The malalignment group had a significantly greater ΔPFA than the normal group. ΔPFA was correlated with SVA only in the malalignment group. Conclusions: The magnitude of the ΔPFA indicated insufficient hip extension to compensate for the spinopelvic mismatch during upright standing.

Defining Age-Adjusted PI-LL Targets for Surgical Realignment in Adult Degenerative Scoliosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate postoperative pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI-LL) and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes to determine age-adjusted PI-LL targets. Method: The dataset encompassed a range of variables, including age, sex, body mass index, Charlson comorbidity index, presence of osteopenia, hospital stay, operative duration, blood loss, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, number of fusion levels, lumbar lordosis, sagittal vertical axis, pelvic incidence, and PI-LL. The non-linear relationship between PI-LL and clinical outcomes was examined using a curve analysis, with adjustments made for potential confounding variables. Upon identification of a non-linear relationship, a two-piecewise regression model was employed to determine the threshold effect. Results: A total of 280 patients were enrolled. In the fully adjusted model, the optimal PI-LL target for patients aged 45-54 years old was PI-LL < 10°, the optimal target for patients aged 55-74 was 10-20°, and the optimal target for patients older than 75 years was more suitable for PI-LL > 20°. In the curve-fitting graph, it could be seen that the relationship between PI-LL and HRQOL outcomes was not linear in each age group. The peaks of the curves within each group occurred at different locations. Higher and lower thresholds for optimal surgical goals were determined using the two-piecewise regression model from the SRS-22 score and the ODI score. Conclusions: This study showed that the optimal PI-LL after corrective surgery in adult degenerative scoliosis patients should be adjusted according to age.

MRI study on the influence of lumbosacral vertebral body and disc factors on lumbar lordosis in children.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of vertebral and disc wedging on the contribution of lumbar lordosis and the change of disc thickness before and after walking based on MRI. METHODS: Cross-sectional study. A total of 96 normally developing children, aged 5.7 ± 3.0 years old, 55 boys and 41 girls. They were divided into 3 groups: Pre-walking group, Walking group, and Post-walking group. PARAMETERS: lumbar lordosis Angle (LLA), the sum of the lumbar disc wedge Angle (∑D), the sum of the lumbar vertebral body wedge Angle (∑B), disc height (DH). RESULTS: (1) LLA, ∑D, ∑B, and DHL1-S1 were 33.2 ± 8.7°, 14.1 ± 8.6°, 11.9 ± 8.6°, and 6.9 ± 1.2 mm, 7.6 ± 1.4 mm, 8.2 ± 1.6 mm, 8.9 ± 1.7 mm, 8.5 ± 1.8 mm. (2) The difference in LLA values between the Pre-walking and the Post-walking group was statistically significant. DH were significantly different among the three groups. (3) In the Post-walking group, LLA value of girls was significantly higher than that of boys, and DHL3 - 4 and DHL4 - 5 values of girls were significantly lower than that of boys. (4) Age had a low positive correlation with LLA and ∑D and a moderate to strong positive correlation with DH; LLA showed a moderate positive correlation with ∑D, and a low positive correlation with ∑B and DH. CONCLUSION: Age and walking activity are the influencing factors of lumbar lordosis and disc thickening. Walking activity can significantly increase lumbar lordosis, and age is the main factor promoting lumbar disc thickening. DHL4-5 was the thickest lumbar intervertebral disc with the fastest intergroup thickening. Disc wedging contributes more to lumbar lordosis than vertebral wedging.

Analyzing results of cervical sagittal parameters in patients operated with polyetheretherketone cages without plate.

Study Design: This was a retrospective longitudinal observational study. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze the results of cervical sagittal parameters on preoperative and postoperative lateral radiographs in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). ACDF is believed to change craniocervical parameters and thus cervical curvature using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) or titanium cages with or without self-locking as well as an anterior plate, the latter of which has not been shown to provide better clinical or radiological results. Overview of Literature: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a common degenerative pathology that can affect one or more levels and treatment has varied over time trying to maintain sagittal parameters within acceptable values where the ACDF is the main treatment. Materials and Methods: The study was performed in patients with CSM who underwent anterior cervical discectomy, and their pre- and postoperative radiographs were analyzed using Surgimap software a few days before and 3 months after surgery. Results: Fifteen files were included in the study. Statistically significant sagittal balance variables were observed in cervical lordosis (CL) with an increase of 4.73° (P = 0.019) and T1 slope (T1S)-CL with a decrease of -5.93° (P = 0.007). Conclusions: CL and T1S-CL showed favorably modified values when performing ACDF using stand-alone PEEK cages without the need for self-blocking or an anterior plate.

The Impact of L4-L5 Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion on 2-Year Adjacent-level Parameters.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the impact of L4-L5 minimally invasive surgery (MIS)- transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) on adjacent-level parameters. METHODS: This is a retrospective study performed on consecutive patients between January 2015 and December 2019. The index- and adjacent-level segmental lordosis (SL) and disc angle (DA) were measured. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were collected preoperatively and at 3-24 months postoperatively. Factors influencing changes in adjacent-level parameters and the occurrence of adjacent segment degeneration (ASDeg) were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 117 adult patients, averaging 65.5 years of age and slight preponderance of female (56.4%), were analyzed. L4-L5 SL decreased at 2 years (P < 0.05), but L4-L5 DA significantly increased at all timepoints (P < 0.05). While L3-L4 SL and DA significantly decreased at all timepoints (P < 0.05), L5-S1 SL decreased at 3 and 12 months (P < 0.05) and L5-S1 DA only significantly decreased at 2 years (P < 0.05). All PROs improved significantly (P < 0.0001). The ASDeg rate was 19.7% at 2.2 years. Cephalad and caudal ASDeg rates were 12.0% and 10.3%, respectively. Eight patients (6.8%) required adjacent-level reoperations, mainly at L3-L4 (6 cases). The use of expandable cage significantly reduced the odds of caudal ASDeg (OR 0.15, P = 0.037), but had no significant effect on cephalad ASDeg. CONCLUSIONS: L4-L5 MIS-TLIF had a more consistent effect on L3-L4 than L5-S1. Although adjacent-level SL and DA decreased over time, their association with ASDeg appears limited, suggesting a multifactorial etiology. L4-L5 MIS-TLIF provides demonstrable clinical benefits with lasting PRO improvements and low adjacent-level reoperations.