Development of Notch-Free, Pre-Bent Rod Applicable for Posterior Corrective Surgery of Thoracolumbar/Lumbar Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), the most common pediatric musculoskeletal disorder, causes a three-dimensional spine deformity. Lenke type 5 AIS is defined as a structural thoracolumbar/lumbar curve with nonstructural thoracic curves. Although a rod curvature will affect clinical outcomes, intraoperative contouring of the straight rod depends on the surgeon's knowledge and experience. This study aimed to determine the optimum rod geometries to provide a pre-bent rod system for posterior spinal surgery in patients with Lenke type 5 AIS. These pre-bent rods will be beneficial for achieving proper postoperative outcomes without rod contouring based on surgeon experience. We investigated 20 rod geometries traced in posterior spinal reconstruction in patients with Lenke type 5 AIS. The differences between the center point clouds in each cluster were evaluated using the iterative closest point (ICP) method with modification. Before the evaluation using the ICP method, the point clouds were divided into four clusters based on the rod length using a hierarchical cluster analysis. Because the differences in the values derived from the ICP method were <5 mm for each length-based cluster, four representative rod shapes were generated from the length-based clusters. We identified four optimized rod shapes that will reduce operation time, leading to a decreased patient and surgeon burden.

Incidence and predictive factors of shoulder imbalance after selective anterior spinal fusion surgery in Lenke type 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Background: No study has assessed the incidence or predictors of postoperative shoulder imbalance (PSI) in patients with Lenke type 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) who underwent selective anterior spinal fusion (ASF). This study evaluated the incidence and predictors of shoulder imbalance after selective ASF for Lenke type 5C AIS. Methods: In total, 62 patients with Lenke type 5C AIS (4 men and 58 women, mean age at surgery of 15.5 ± 1.5 years) were included and divided into the following two groups according to the radiographic shoulder height (RSH) at the final follow-up: PSI and non-PSI groups. All patients in this study underwent a whole-spine radiological evaluation. Various spinal coronal and sagittal profiles on radiographs were compared between the 2 groups. The clinical outcomes were assessed using the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 questionnaires. Results: The mean final follow-up duration was 8.6 ± 2.7 years. PSI was observed in 10 patients (16.1%) immediately after surgery; however, in the long-term follow-up period, PSI improved in 3 patients spontaneously, whereas the remaining 7 patients had residual PSI. The preoperative RSH and correction rates of the major curve immediately after surgery or at the final follow-up were significantly larger in the PSI group than in the non-PSI group (p=.001, p=.023, and p=.019, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that the cutoff values for preoperative RSH and the correction rates immediately after surgery and at the final follow-up were 11.79 mm (p=.002; area under the curve [AUC], 0.948), 71.0% (p=.026; AUC, 0.822), and 65.4% (p=.021; AUC, 0.835), respectively. No statistically significant difference was observed in the preoperative and final follow-up SRS-22 scores in any domain between the PSI and non-PSI groups. Conclusions: Paying attention to the preoperative RSH and avoiding excessive correction of the major curve can prevent the occurrence of shoulder imbalance after selective ASF for Lenke type 5C AIS.

Influence of Lateral Translation of Lowest Instrumented Vertebra on L4 Tilt and Coronal Balance for Thoracolumbar and Lumbar Curves in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

This study aimed to evaluate the lowest instrumented vertebra translation (LIV-T) in the surgical treatment of thoracolumbar/lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and to analyze the radiographic parameters in relation to LIV-T and L4 tilt and global coronal balance. A total of 62 patients underwent posterior spinal fusion (PSF, n = 32) or anterior spinal fusion (ASF, n = 30) and were followed up for a minimum of 2 years. The mean preoperative LIV-T was significantly larger in the ASF group than the PSF (p < 0.01), while the final LIV-T was equivalent. LIV-T at the final follow-up was significantly correlated with L4 tilt and the global coronal balance (r = 0.69, p < 0.01, r = 0.38, p < 0.01, respectively). Receiver-operating characteristic analysis for good outcomes, with L4 tilt <8° and coronal balance <15 mm at the final follow-up, calculated the cutoff value of the final LIV-T as 12 mm. The cutoff value of preoperative LIV-T that would result in the LIV-T of ≤12 mm at the final follow-up was 32 mm in PSF, although no significant cutoff value was calculated in ASF. ASF can centralize the LIV better than PSF with a shorter segment fusion, and could be useful in obtaining a good curve correction and global balance without fixation to L4 in cases with large preoperative LIV-T.

Postoperative proximal junctional kyphosis correlated with thoracic inlet angle in Lenke 5c adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients following posterior surgery.

BACKGROUND: Proximal junctional kyphosis is a common complication after posterior fusion in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and is correlated with postoperative changes of thoracic kyphosis. In lenke 5c patients, higher postoperative LL and spontaneous change of TK may produce an effect on final PJK. However, no studies has been performed to evaluate the correlation of PJK with thoracocervical parameters in patients with AIS. METHODS: Data from 98 patients who underwent posterior fusion for Lenke 5C AIS with 2 years of follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Patients in the extended fusion group underwent fusion at levels higher than upper-end vertebra + 2 (n = 38), and those in the thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) fusion group underwent fusion at UEV + 2 or lower (n = 60). RESULTS: During an average follow-up of 38.1 months, 23 of 98 patients developed PJK. The extended fusion group had a higher incidence of PJK than the TL/L fusion group (14/38 vs. 9/60, respectively; P = 0.01) and a significantly greater decrease in thoracic kyphosis than the TL/L group (P < 0.01). Patients with PJK had a significantly larger preoperative thoracic inlet angle (TIA) than those without PJK (P < 0.01). Multivariate analysis showed that a greater preoperative TIA and extended fusion were associated with PJK. The Scoliosis Research Society 22-item questionnaire score did not significantly differ between the PJK and non-PJK groups. CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative TIA could be a predictor of PJK. Among patients with Lenke 5C AIS, those with a TIA of > 71° are more likely to develop PJK. Additionally, extended fusion in patients with Lenke 5C may increase the risk of PJK.

The Importance of Lumbar Curve Flexibility and Apical Vertebral Rotation for the Prediction of Spontaneous Lumbar Curve Correction in Selective Thoracic Fusion for Lenke Type 1 and 2 C Curves: Retrospective Cohort Study with a Mean Follow-Up of More than 10 years.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: Lumbar flexibility(LF) is generally defined with preoperative side bending films;it is not clear what percentage of LF predicts the spontaneous lumbar curve correction (SLCC) at long term follow up. Aim of this study was to find out cut-off value of preoperative LF,apical vertebra rotation(AVR) and apical vertebral translation(AVT);which may predict more than 50%SLCC. METHODS: Patients with Lenke 1C&2C curves,treated with posterior STF,with a minimum 10 years follow up were included.The patients who had more than 50% SLCC(Group A) or less than 50% (Group B) were compared in terms of LF,AVR and AVT to understand a cut-off value of those parameters.Statistically, Receiver Operating Characteristic(ROC) test was used. RESULTS: Fifty five AIS patients (54F, 1M) with mean age 14 (11-17) were included to study.Thoracic curve correction rate was 75%;lumbar curve correction rate was 59% at the latest follow up.Group A included 45(82%) patients at the latest follow up.Three patients (5%) showed coronal decompensation at early postop and 2 of them became compensated at f/up.ROC analyses showed 69% flexibility as the cut-off value for SLCC (P < .01).The difference between groups in terms of preop mean AVRs was significant (P = .029) (Group A = 1.9; Group B = 2.4). CONCLUSION: In Lenke 1C&2C curves,whenever LF on the preoperative bending x-ray is greater than 70% (P < .01)and AVR is equal or less than grade 2,STF provides satisfactory clinical and radiological SLCC with more than mean 10 years f/up.This flexibility rate and apical vertebral rotation can be helpful in decision making for successful STF.

Preoperative factors associated with optimal outcomes of selective thoracic fusion at 5 years.

PURPOSE: Prior work identified optimal outcomes at 2 years following selective thoracic fusion (STF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) but it is unclear whether these published predictors represent what is required to achieve an optimal outcome with further time and potential growth. The purpose of this study was to determine the preoperative factors associated with optimal outcome of STF for AIS at 5 years. METHODS: Patients with primary thoracic AIS (Lenke 1-4C curves) who underwent a STF and had minimum 5 years of follow-up were included. Optimal postoperative outcomes for a STF included a deformity-flexibility quotient (DFQ) < 4, lumbar curve < 26°, lumbar correction > 37%, C7-CSVL < 2 cm, lumbar prominence < 5°, and trunk shift < 1.5 cm. These outcomes were used to determine whether adhering to published recommendations for STF increased the likelihood of obtaining an optimal outcome at 5 years, which included: preoperative lumbar curve < 45°, lumbar bend < 25°, apical vertebral translation ratio > 1.2, and thoracic/thoracolumbar Cobb ratio > 1.2. RESULTS: 127 patients met inclusion. A preoperative lumbar curve < 45° was associated with an increased likelihood of achieving three of the optimal outcomes: DFQ < 4, lumbar curve < 26°, and lumbar prominence < 5°. Following the 25° bend rule resulted in two optimal outcomes, while Cobb ratio > 1.2 was only associated with one optimal outcome. AVT > 1.2 was not significantly associated with any optimal outcome measures. CONCLUSION: This study found that at 5 years, performing a STF when there is a preoperative lumbar Cobb < 45° remained the best guideline for increasing the likelihood of an optimal outcome.

Long-Term Follow-up of Posterior Selective Thoracolumbar/Lumbar Fusion in Patients With Lenke 5C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: An Analysis of 10-Year Outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess long-term radiographic and clinical outcomes in Lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients after posterior selective fusion. METHODS: Lenke 5C AIS patients who underwent posterior selective thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) fusion in our hospital from January 2007 to January 2010 were recruited. Radiographic parameters were measured preoperatively and at the 3-month, 1-year, 2-year, 5-year, and 10-year follow-ups. The SRS-22 (Scoliosis Research Society) questionnaire was used to assess the clinical outcomes. RESULTS: We included 37 patients who underwent posterior selective TL/L fusion surgery in our study, and the mean follow-up time was 11.26 ± 0.85 years. The average preoperative Cobb angles of the thoracic and TL/L curves were 24.0 ± 9.0° and 45.4 ± 6.3°, respectively, which were corrected to 12.2° and 12.4° at the 3-month follow-up postoperatively, with correction losses of 2.2° and 1.5° at the 10-year follow-up. In the sagittal plane, the degree of thoracic kyphosis (TK) gradually increased over the follow-up period. The proximal junctional angle (PJA) also gradually increased from 6.7 ± 4.6 to 13.7 ± 5.6 during the follow-up period. For the clinical outcomes, correction surgery improved the SRS-22 scores in each domain, especially in the self-image domain. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior selective TL/L fusion can effectively correct spinal deformities, leading to stable outcomes for 10 years postoperatively. During the follow-up period, the degree of TK presented an increasing trend that remained almost constant after the 1-year follow-up. Moreover, the variation in the PJA was highly significant in the postoperative period, and it showed an increasing trend until the 2-year follow-up.

Clinical predictive model of lumbar curve Cobb angle below selective fusion for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a longitudinal multicenter descriptive study.

PURPOSE: To implement a clinically applicable, predictive model for the lumbar Cobb angle below a selective thoracic fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. METHODS: A series of 146 adolescents with Lenke 1 or 2 idiopathic scoliosis, surgically treated with posterior selective fusion, and minimum follow-up of 5 years (average 7) was analyzed. The cohort was divided in 2 groups: if lumbar Cobb angle at last follow-up was, respectively, ≥ or < 10°. A logistic regression-based prediction model (PredictMed) was implemented to identify variables associated with the group ≥ 10°. The guidelines of the TRIPOD statement were followed. RESULTS: Mean Cobb angle of thoracic main curve was 56° preoperatively and 25° at last follow-up. Mean lumbar Cobb angle was 33° (20; 59) preoperatively and 11° (0; 35) at last follow-up. 53 patients were in group ≥ 10°. The 2 groups had similar demographics, flexibility of both main and lumbar curves, and magnitude of the preoperative main curve, p > 0.1. From univariate analysis, mean magnitude of preoperative lumbar curves (35° vs. 30°), mean correction of main curve (65% vs. 58%), mean ratio of main curve/distal curve (1.9 vs. 1.6) and distribution of lumbar modifiers were statistically different between groups (p < 0.05). PredictMed identified the following variables significantly associated with the group ≥ 10°: main curve % correction at last follow-up (p = 0.01) and distal curve angle (p = 0.04) with a prediction accuracy of 71%. CONCLUSION: The main modifiable factor influencing uninstrumented lumbar curve was the correction of main curve. The clinical model PredictMed showed an accuracy of 71% in prediction of lumbar Cobb angle ≥ 10° at last follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: Longitudinal comparative study.

Preoperative pelvic obliquity: possible relation to postoperative coronal decompensation in thoracolumbar/lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

OBJECTIVE: Pelvic obliquity is frequently observed in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) curve. This study aimed to assess pelvic obliquity changes and their effects on clinical outcomes of posterior fusion surgery. METHODS: Data in 80 patients (69 with type 5C and 11 with type 6C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis) who underwent posterior fusion surgery were retrospectively analyzed. Pelvic obliquity was defined as an absolute pelvic obliquity angle (POA) value of ≥ 3°. The patients were divided into groups according to preoperative pelvic obliquity. Moreover, patients with preoperative pelvic obliquity were divided based on POA change from preoperative values versus 2 years postoperatively. Patients were divided based on the presence of selective or nonselective TL/L fusion. Radiographic parameters and clinical outcomes were compared between these groups. RESULTS: Among 80 patients, 41 (51%) showed preoperative pelvic obliquity, and its direction was upward to the right for all cases. Coronal decompensation 2 years postoperatively was significantly elevated in patients with preoperative pelvic obliquity (p < 0.05). Thirty-two patients (40%) displayed pelvic obliquity 2 years postoperatively. Among 41 patients with preoperative pelvic obliquity, 22 patients (54%) were in the group with a decrease in POA, and 19 were in the group with no decrease. The group with no decrease in POA showed significant TL/L curve progression throughout the postoperative follow-up period. The patients with nonselective fusion showed a significantly lower incidence of pelvic obliquity at 2 years postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative coronal decompensation more frequently occurred in patients with preoperative pelvic obliquity than in those without pelvic obliquity preoperatively. In addition, postoperative pelvic obliquity changes may be related to residual lumbar curve behavior.

Proximal junctional kyphosis in Lenke 5 AIS patients: the important factor of pelvic incidence.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to investigate whether pelvic incidence (PI) will affect the occurrence of PJK in Lenke 5 AIS patients after correction surgery and try to explore a better surgical scheme based on PI. METHODS: Lenke 5C AIS patients that underwent correction surgery with a minimum of a 2-year follow-up were identified. Demographic and radiographic data were collected preoperatively, postoperatively, and at the final follow-up. The comparison between the PJK and the Non-PJK group was conducted and the subgroup analysis was performed based on the preoperative value of PI to investigate the potential mechanism of PJK. Clinical assessments were performed using the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 questionnaire. RESULTS: The mean preoperative Cobb angle of the TL/L curve was 53.4°±8.6. At the final follow-up, the mean TL/L Cobb angle was drastically decreased to 7.3°±6.8 (P < 0.001). The incidence of PJK in Lenke 5 AIS was 18.6 %, 21.9 % (7/32) in the low PI group (PI < 45°) and 15.8 % (6/38) in the high PI group (PI ≥ 45°), and there was no statistical difference between the two groups (χ2 = 0.425, P = 0.514). For low PI patients, there is no significant difference where the UIV is located with regards to the TK apex between the PJK and Non-PJK subgroups (χ2 = 1.103, P = 0.401). For high PI patients, PJK was more likely to occur when UIV was cephalad to than caudal to the TK apex (31.25 % vs. 4.7 %, P = 0.038). There was no significant difference in the selection of LIV between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference in the incidence of PJK between the Lenke 5 AIS patients with low PI (< 45°) and high PI (≥45°), but the main risk factor of PJK should be different. For patients with low PI, overcorrection of LL should be strictly avoided during surgery. For patients with high PI, the selection of UIV should not be at or cephalad to the apex of thoracic kyphosis to retain more mobile thoracic segments.

Selective Fusion in Lenke 1 B/C: Before or After Menarche?

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective, comparative study. OBJECTIVE: To determine the radiological behavior of the lumbar curve in selective fusions in premenarchal girls with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (Lenke 1 B/C). METHODS: A retrospective, comparative study was conducted. Selective fusion was performed in 21 patients younger than 18 years. The patients were divided into 2 groups: group A, after menarche (n = 12) and group B, before menarche (n = 9). Angles (preoperative, and at 1 and 2 years postoperatively) of the fused thoracic curves and the corresponding lumbar curves were measured and compared. For statistical analysis, the t test was used with a significance level of P < .05. RESULTS: Mean preoperative angle value of the proximal/main thoracic curve was 61° in group A and 57° in group B (P = .44), and 21° and 20°, respectively, in the first year postoperatively (P = .61). Mean preoperative angle value of the lumbar curve was 43° in group A and 42° in group B (P = .87), while at 1 year after surgery, this curve was 19° in both groups (P = 0.91), and at 2 years postoperatively, the curve was 16° in group A and 17° in group B (P = .75). CONCLUSIONS: Over a 2-year follow-up, we did not find significant radiological differences in lumbar curves between patients who underwent surgery before and after menarche.

Predictors of spontaneous lumbar curve correction in thoracic-only fusions: 3D analysis in AIS.

PURPOSE: To evaluate how 3D parameters of the instrumented thoracic spine relate to the uninstrumented lumbar spine following thoracic-only fusion (TOF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and determine the factors predictive of lumbar correction. METHODS: A multi-center retrospective review was conducted of AIS patients with Lenke 1-4 B or C curves undergoing fusion of their thoracic spine only with minimum 2-year follow-up and 3D spine reconstructions from biplanar radiography. Pre-operative to 2-year post-operative differences were evaluated. Pearson's correlations were used to identify 3D coronal, sagittal and axial relationships at 2 years post-operative. Multivariate linear regression was used to identify variables most predictive of lumbar curve correction. RESULTS: Eighty-four AIS patients met inclusion (54 B modifiers, 30 C modifiers). Average pre-operative thoracic and lumbar curves were 54 ± 9° and 41 ± 7° and corrected to 19 ± 7° and 21 ± 7°, respectively. 3D T5-T12 thoracic kyphosis increased from 6 ± 13° to 26 ± 8°. Thoracic and lumbar apical rotation decreased from - 14 ± 6° to -5 ± 6° and 13 ± 5° to 11 ± 6°, respectively. Thoracic curve correction correlated with lumbar curve correction (r = 0.67, p = 0.001) and decreased LIV tilt correlated with smaller residual lumbar curve magnitude (r = 0.63, p < 0.001). Increasing 3D kyphosis of the instrumented segment correlated with increased percentage lumbar curve correction (r = 0.29, p = 0.009). Multivariate linear regression showed LIV tilt and thoracic curve magnitude as the most predictive variables of post-operative residual lumbar curve magnitude, and percent correction of the thoracic curve and change in 3D instrumented kyphosis as most predictive of percent correction of the lumbar curve. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of 3D data highlights several considerations for AIS patients undergoing TOF. Maximizing thoracic curve correction, leveling the LIV, and to a lesser extent, restoring kyphosis in the instrumented segment are the factors most likely to result in greater correction of the instrumented lumbar curve following thoracic-only fusions in Lenke 1-4 B and C curves.

Comparison of Pulmonary Function After Selective Anterior Versus Posterior Fusion for the Correction of Thoracolumbar and Lumbar Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective multicenter study. OBJECTIVES: To compare the selective anterior spinal fusion (ASF) versus posterior spinal fusion (PSF) on postoperative pulmonary function testing (PFT) whether thoracotomy with separation of the diaphragm by anterior approach influences the PFT in thoracolumbar and lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). METHODS: A multicenter series of AIS patients who underwent selective spinal fusion were retrospectively reviewed. Seventy-nine female patients were included (mean 15.8 years). There were 35 patients in the ASF group and 44 patients in the PSF group. Patient demographics, radiographic measurements, and PFT data from preoperative to 2-year follow-up were analyzed. RESULTS: Preoperatively, there were no significant differences in PFTs between the groups. The ASF group patients were more likely to undergo shorter fusions (4.5 instrumented vertebral levels) than those in the PSF group (5.2 levels). At 2-year follow-up, forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) in ASF group were statistically lower than those in PSF group. When comparing preoperative and 2-year changes on each procedure, only %FVC showed significant difference in ASF while FVC, FEV1, and %FEV1 did not. Meanwhile, the ASF group showed a significant decrease in FVC at 6 and 12 months compared to preoperative values. In PSF group, there was a decrease at 6 months, returned to preoperative value at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary function after ASF and PSF was similar at 2 years; however, anterior group did not return to the baseline at 6 months and 1 year suggesting anterior approach may affect early postoperative pulmonary function.

Does the McRoberts' manoeuvre need to start with thigh abduction? An innovative biomechanical study.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines and description about the achievement of the McRoberts manoeuvre are discordant, particularly concerning the need for abduction before the beginning of the manoeuvre. We sought to compare the biomechanical efficiency of the McRoberts' manoeuvre, with and without thigh abduction. METHODS: In a postural comparative study, twenty-three gravidas > 32 weeks of gestational age and not in labour were assessed during three repetitions of two McRoberts' manoeuvre that differed in terms of starting position. For the (i) McRoberts, the legs were initially placed in stirrups; for the (m) McRoberts, the legs were resting on the bed, with thighs in wide abduction. For each manoeuvre, flexion of the plane of the external conjugate of the pelvis on the spine (ANGce), hip flexion and abduction, were assessed using an optoelectronic motion capture system. Lumbar curve were assessed with Epionics Spine® system. Temporal parameters including movement duration or acceleration of the external conjugate were also computed. All values ​​obtained for the two types of manoeuvres were compared using a Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test. The significance level was defined as p < 0.05. RESULTS: The starting position of McRoberts' otherwise had no effect on the maximum ANGce (p = 0.199), the minimal lordosis of the lumbar curve (p = 0.474), or the maximal hip flexion (p = 0.057). The other parameters were not statistically different according to the starting position (p > 0.005). CONCLUSION: Regardless of the starting position, the McRoberts' manoeuvre allows ascension of the pubic symphysis and reduction of the lumbar lordosis. This results imply that the McRoberts' manoeuvre could be performed with the legs initially placed in the stirrups.

Midterm surgical outcomes of a short fusion strategy for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with Lenke 5C curve.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: A previous study examined the short-term (2 years) outcomes of a short fusion strategy for Lenke type 5C curves. This strategy had a little less correction rate with no difference in coronal and sagittal balance and SRS-22 scores to those of a conventional strategy and was superior in operative time and intraoperative bleeding. However, its effectiveness in longer follow-up periods was unknown. PURPOSE: To assess midterm surgical outcomes of a short fusion strategy for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) with Lenke type 5C curve, involving posterior correction and fusion surgery (PSF) using pedicle-screw constructs. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. PATIENT SAMPLE: Twenty-nine patients who underwent PSF for AIS with Lenke type 5C curve with a minimum 5-year follow-up. OUTCOME MEASURES: Radiographic parameters and SRS-22. METHODS: We compared radiographic parameters and clinical outcomes between patients with an upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) at the end vertebra (EV) (n=12) and those treated by short fusion (S), with a UIV one level caudal to the EV (n=17). RESULTS: A preoperative mean Cobb angle of 51.9±13.8° was corrected to 11.7±7.7° in the EV group, and an angle of 46.0±6.6° was corrected to 9.3±5.2° in the S group. The correction was maintained in both groups at the final follow-up, and the mean correction loss was 2.8±6.8° in the EV and 6.5±6.5° in the S group (p=.143). The mean correction rate at the final follow-up was not significantly different between the EV (71.4±11.8%) and S (64.9±13.7%) groups (p=.199). A Cobb angle of a thoracic curve was significantly improved immediately after surgery and maintained during the follow-up period in the both groups. Coronal and sagittal balance, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, L4 tilt, UIV/LIV tilt, shoulder balance, and SRS-22 had no difference between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in radiographic parameters and SRS-22 between patients treated with a UIV at the UEV and patients treated using a short fusion strategy, in which the UIV was one level caudal to the UEV. The short fusion strategy can be one of the alternatives in PSF for Lenke type 5C curves, at least in 5-year time frame.

Is there an impact of feet position on squatting birth position? An innovative biomechanical pilot study.

BACKGROUND: The squatting birth position is widely used for "natural" birth or in countries where childbirth occurs in non-medical facilities. Squatting birth positions, like others, are roughly defined so a biomechanical assessment is required with the availability of noninvasive technology in pregnant women. In practice, we can observe spontaneously two kinds of squatting birth position: on tiptoes and with feet flat. OBJECTIVE: To compare the impact of foot posture on biomechanical parameters considered essential in obstetrical biomechanics during a squatting birth position: on tiptoes versus with feet flat on the floor. STUDY DESIGN: Thirteen pregnant women beyond 32 weeks of gestational age who were not in labor were assessed during squatting birth position firstly spontaneously and secondly with the foot posture that was not taken spontaneously (on the tiptoes vs with feet flat). For each position, ANGle of flexion on the spine of the plane of the pelvis external conjugate (ANGec), hip flexion and abduction, and lumbar curve were assessed using an optoelectronic motion capture system and a biomechanical model adapted from the conventional gait model as well as a measuring system of the lumbar curve. RESULTS: Spontaneously, 11 out of 13 women squatted on tiptoe at the first test. On tiptoes the hip flexion was lower than with feet flat (p < 0.02), whereas hip abduction was not significantly different (p = 0.28). A lower ANGec angle (p = 0.003) was noticed for the tiptoe position than feet flat. The lumbar curve (lordosis) was more marked for the squatting position on tiptoes than for the position with feet flat (p < 0.001). On tiptoes no woman had a pelvic inlet plane perpendicular to the spine and none had a flat back or kyphosis. No woman on tiptoes fulfilled the two conditions necessary for the position that we consider optimal. CONCLUSION: In squatting birth position, foot posture has a biomechanical impact on lumbar curve and pelvic orientation. When comparing squatting positions (on tiptoes vs feet flat), feet flat on the ground is closer to optimal birth conditions than on tiptoes.

Accurate prediction of spontaneous lumbar curve correction following posterior selective thoracic fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using logistic regression models and clinical rationale.

INTRODUCTION: Accurate prediction of spontaneous lumbar curve correction (SLCC) after selective thoracic fusion (STF) remains difficult. This study sought to improve prediction accuracy of SLCC. The hypothesis was preoperative and intraoperative variables could predict SLCC < 20°. METHODS: A multicenter observational prospective analysis was conducted to determine predictors of SLCC in AIS patients that had posterior STF. Curve types included major thoracic curves (Lenke 1, 3-4).The primary outcome variable was to establish prediction models, and a postoperative lumbar curve (LC) ≤ 20° was defined as the target variable. Multivariate logistic regression models were established to study the relationship between selected variables and a LC ≤ 20° versus a LC > 20° at ≥ 2-year follow-up. Single and dual thresholds models in perspective of clinical rationales were applied to find models with the highest positive/negative predictive values (PPV/NPV). The secondary outcome measure was SRS scores at ≥ 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: 410 patients were included. At ≥ 2-year follow-up 282 patients had LC ≤ 20°. These patients had better SRS-22 scores than those with LC > 20° (P = 0.02). The postoperative LC and LC ≤ 20° were predicted by preoperative LC and LC-bending Cobb angle (P < 0.01, r = 0.4-0.6). Logistic regression models could be established to identify patients at risk for failing the target LC ≤ 20°.For preoperative LC and LC-bending, the prediction model achieved a NPV/PPV of 80%/72%. If the postoperative main thoracic curve is combined with the preoperative LC and a gray area for difficult decisions was allowed, model accuracy could even be improved (NPV/PPV = 96%/81%). CONCLUSION: An accurate prediction model for postoperative SLCC was established based on a large analysis of prospective STF cases. These models can support prediction and understanding of postoperative SLCC aiding in surgical decision making when contemplating a selective thoracic fusion. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

L3 translation predicts when L3 is not distal enough for an "ideal" result in Lenke 5 curves.

PURPOSE: Determining whether to fuse a Lenke 5 curve to L3 or to L4 is often a difficult decision. The purpose of this study was to determine preoperative variables predictive of an "ideal" or "less than ideal" outcome for Lenke 5 curves instrumented to L3. METHODS: A multicentre registry of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients was queried for surgically treated Lenke 5 curves with a lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) of L3 and minimum 2 years of follow-up. Five seasoned surgeons qualitatively rated the 2-year postoperative images as "ideal" or "less than ideal" with respect to correction and alignment. Preoperative and postoperative radiographic variables were compared between the two groups. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to determine variables most predictive of a "less than ideal" outcome. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-nine patients met criteria. Twenty-three were considered "less than ideal" by ≥ 3 surgeons; 81 were unanimously "ideal". Preoperatively, the "less than ideal" group had significantly stiffer curves, greater apical translation, and greater LIV angulation and translation. Multivariate regression found that preoperative L3 translation (p = 0.009) was the single most important predictor of a "less than ideal" outcome: < 3.5 cm consistently resulted in an "ideal" outcome, while > 3.5 cm risked a "less than ideal" result. CONCLUSION: While multiple variables are important in achieving an "ideal" outcome in Lenke 5 curves, this study found preoperative L3 translation was the most important predictor of success with an L3 translation < 3.5 cm being a potential threshold for selecting L3 as the LIV. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Where to stop distally in Lenke modifier C AIS with lumbar curve more than 60°: L3 or L4?

OBJECTIVE: Selecting lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) with large lumbar curve can be difficult. Stopping the distal fusion at L3 could save more mobile lumbar segments but may increase the risk of decompensation. This study was designed to evaluate preoperative radiographic factors that were associated with the selection of either L3 or L4 as LIV in posteriorly treated AIS patients with large lumbar curve. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 84 AIS patients with lumbar curve >60° were analyzed with a minimum of 2-year follow-up after posterior instrumentation with lumbar curves included in fusion. Patients were grouped according to the selection of LIV, either L3 or L4 group. All radiograph parameters were measured pre- and post-operatively including Cobb angle, lumbar flexibility, L3 translation and rotation on posteroanterior (PA) and side-bending (SB) film, etc. The SRS-22 score was used to assess clinical outcomes. Radiographic and clinical parameters were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There were 24 patients in L3 group and 60 patients in L4 group. At last follow-up, no difference was found in the clinical and radiographic parameters between the two groups. Preoperatively, the L3 group had lower L3 translation on PA view, L3 translation on concave SB film, L3 rotation on convex SB film, more L3/4 disc opening on convex SB film and larger lumbar flexibility. Multivariate regression found L3 translation on concave SB film was the single most important predictor of LIV selection. Specifically, L3 translation on concave SB film <10 mm was a potential threshold for selecting L3 as LIV. CONCLUSIONS: For AIS patients with large lumbar curve, instrumentation can be reliably stopped at L3 if L3 translation on preoperative concave SB film was less than 10 mm, with the same radiographic and clinical outcomes as fusing to L4.

Comparison of Extending Fusion to Thoracic Curve Versus Thoracolumbar/Lumbar Fusion in Posterior Fusion of Patients with Lenke 5C: Variation in Upper End Vertebrae Tilt Affected Coronal Balance.

BACKGROUND: Extended fusion can be performed in patients with Lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) with a large and relatively rigid thoracic curve. Progression of the thoracic curve is related to coronal imbalance. We aimed to determine the correlation between the upper instrumented vertebra choice and coronal balance in patients with Lenke 5C AIS. METHODS: A total of 61 patients with Lenke 5C AIS underwent posterior fusion from 2009 to 2015 in a single institution with ≥2 years of follow-up data available. The extended fusion group (n = 32) and thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) fusion group (n = 29) were compared for the correction rates for the main TL/L and thoracic curves, coronal balance, upper end vertebra (UEV) tilt, and Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire score. RESULTS: Both groups had excellent correction of the main TL/L curve, and the extended fusion group had a significantly greater correction rate of the thoracic curve than the TL/L fusion group (70.2% vs. 57.3%). The incidence of coronal imbalance was similar in both groups. The spontaneous change in UEV tilt was associated with the change in coronal balance from the first to the final follow-up examination. In the TL/L fusion group, the increase in UEV tilt from the first to final follow-up visit resulted in improved coronal balance at the final follow-up examination. Both groups had similar Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire scores at 2 years postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with Lenke 5C AIS, thoracic curve fusion results in better correction of the thoracic curve but no improvement in coronal balance. With TL/L fusion, a postoperative UEV tilt >5° leads to better coronal balance.