Spinal fusion surgery use among adults with low back pain enrolled in a digital musculoskeletal program: an observational study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare 12-month spinal fusion surgery rates in the setting of low back pain among digital musculoskeletal (MSK) program participants versus a comparison cohort who only received usual care. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study with propensity score matched comparison cohort using commercial medical claims data representing over 100 million commercially insured lives. METHODS: All study subjects experienced low back pain between January 2020 and December 2021. Digital MSK participants enrolled in the digital MSK low back program between January 2020 and December 2021. Non-participants had low back pain related physical therapy (PT) between January 2020 and December 2021. Digital MSK participants were matched to non-participants with similar demographics, comorbidities and baseline MSK-related medical care use. Spinal fusion surgery rates at 12 months post participation were compared. RESULTS: Compared to non-participants, digital MSK participants had lower rates of spinal fusion surgery in the post-period (0.7% versus 1.6%; p < 0.001). Additionally, in the augmented inverse probability weighting (AIPW) model, digital MSK participants were found to have decreased odds of undergoing spinal fusion surgery (adjusted odds ratio: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.51-0.81). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that participation in a digital MSK program is associated with a lower rate of spinal fusion surgery.

A comparative cohort study of surgical approaches for adult spinal deformity at a minimum 2-year follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN: This study was a retrospective multi-center comparative cohort study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective institutional database of operative adult spinal deformity patients was utilized. All fusions > 5 vertebral levels and including the sacrum/pelvis were eligible for inclusion. Revisions, 3 column osteotomies, and patients with < 2-year clinical follow-up were excluded. Patients were separated into 3 groups based on surgical approach: 1) posterior spinal fusion without interbody (PSF), 2) PSF with interbody (PSF-IB), and 3) anteroposterior (AP) fusion (anterior lumbar interbody fusion or lateral lumbar interbody fusion with posterior screw fixation). Intraoperative, radiographic, and clinical outcomes, as well as complications, were compared between groups with ANOVA and χ2 tests. RESULTS: One-hundred and thirty-eight patients were included for study (PSF, n = 37; PSF-IB, n = 44; AP, n = 57). Intraoperatively, estimated blood loss was similar between groups (p = 0.171). However, the AP group had longer operative times (547.5 min) compared to PSF (385.1) and PSF-IB (370.7) (p < 0.001). Additionally, fusion length was shorter in PSF-IB (11.4) compared to AP (13.6) and PSF (12.9) (p = 0.004). There were no differences between the groups in terms of change in alignment from preoperative to 2 years postoperative. There were no differences in clinical outcomes. While postoperative complications were largely similar between groups, operative complications were higher in the AP group (31.6%) compared to the PSF (5.4%) and PSF-IB (9.1) groups (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: While there were differences in intraoperative outcomes (operative time and fusion length), there were no differences in postoperative clinical or radiographic outcomes. AP fusion was associated with a higher rate of operative complications.

Effect of Residual Pain After Posterior Fusion Surgery for Lumbar Degenerative Disorders on Health-Related Quality of Life: A Two-Year Follow-Up Using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.

STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective cohort study. PURPOSE: The present study aimed to investigate the effects of residual pain after fusion surgery for lumbar degenerative diseases on quality of life (QOL). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Residual symptoms after spinal surgery often restrict patients' activities of daily living and reduce their QOL. However, few studies have comprehensively addressed physical, psychological, and social factors. METHODS: The study population included a cohort of 208 patients (mean age: 67.9 years) who had undergone posterior interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease between 2012 and 2019. We asked the patients to complete the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) and Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) preoperatively, as well as at six, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. The presence of residual postoperative pain (RPP) was determined using the low back pain score of the JOABPEQ at six months postoperatively, and patients with an improvement of < 20 points compared to preoperative assessment were classified as RPP+ based on a previous study. RESULTS: In all patients, there was a notable postoperative improvement in all JOABPEQ and SF-36 domains compared to preoperative scores. The RPP+ group comprised 60 patients (69.6 years), while the RPP- group comprised 148 patients (67.2 years). In the RPP+ group, the lumbar function in the JOABPEQ and general health in the SF-36 showed limited postoperative enhancement. The pace of improvement in the role-emotional, role-physical, social functioning, vitality, and mental health scores was slower in the RPP+ group compared to the RPP- group. CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, we found that the presence of residual pain at six months postoperatively affected QOL improvement up to 24 months after surgery. Lingering postoperative pain substantially impacted functional incapacity, social engagement, and psychological well-being. Notably, the lumbar function in the JOABPEQ and general health in the SF-36 showed distinct progression patterns in the RPP+ group.

The influence of osteoporosis on mechanical complications in lumbar fusion surgery: a systematic review.

Background: Adults undergoing spine surgery often have underlying osteoporosis, which may be a risk factor for postoperative complications. Although these associations have been described, osteoporosis remains profoundly underdiagnosed and undertreated in the spine surgery population. A thorough, comprehensive systematic review summarizing the relationships between bone mineral density (BMD) and specific complications of lumbar fusion surgery could be a valuable resource for raising awareness and supporting clinical practice changes. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched for original clinical research articles reporting on BMD, or surrogate measure, as a predictor of complications in adults undergoing elective lumbar fusion for degenerative disease or deformity. Endpoints included cage subsidence, screw loosening, pseudarthrosis, vertebral fracture, junctional complications, and reoperation. Results: A total of 71 studies comprising 12,278 patients were included. Overall, considerable heterogeneity in study populations, methods of bone health assessment, and definition and evaluation of clinical endpoints precluded meta-analysis. Nevertheless, low BMD was associated with higher rates of implant failures like cage subsidence and screw loosening, which were often diagnosed with concomitant pseudarthrosis. Osteoporosis was also a significant risk factor for proximal junctional kyphosis, particularly due to fracture. Many studies found surgical site-specific BMD to best predict focal complications. Functional outcomes were inconsistently addressed. Conclusions: Our findings suggest osteoporosis is a significant risk factor for mechanical complications of lumbar fusion. These results emphasize the importance of preoperative osteoporosis screening, which allows for medical and surgical optimization of high-risk patients. This review also highlights current practical challenges facing bone health evaluation in patients undergoing elective surgery. Future prospective studies using standardized methods are necessary to strengthen existing evidence, identify optimal predictive thresholds, and establish specialty-specific practice guidelines. In the meantime, an awareness of the surgical implications of osteoporosis and utility of preoperative screening can provide for more informed, effective patient care.

Predictors of Persistent Postoperative Numbness Following Lumbar Fusion in Patients Older Than 75 Years: A Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the preoperative and perioperative predictors of persistent leg numbness following lumbar fusion in patients aged ≥ 75 years. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study examined 304 patients aged ≥ 75 years who underwent lumbar fusion for lumbar degenerative disease (102 men, 202 women; mean age, 79.2 [75-90] years). The visual analogue scale (VAS) score for leg numbness was examined preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively. The persistent leg numbness group included patients with a 2-year postoperative VAS score for leg numbness ≥ 5 points. The demographic data were also reviewed. A multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis was performed for variables with univariate analysis values of p < 0.2 on univariate analysis. RESULTS: In total, 71 patients (23.4%) experienced persistent postoperative leg numbness. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that a history of lumbar decompression, longer symptom duration, and a preoperative VAS score for leg numbness ≥ 5 points were associated with greater postoperative persistent leg numbness following lumbar fusion. In contrast, other factors, such as sex, body mass index, vertebral fracture, diabetes mellitus, depression, symptom duration, dural injury, operative time, and estimated blood loss, were not. CONCLUSION: A history of preoperative lumbar decompression, longer symptom duration, and greater preoperative VAS scores for leg numbness were preoperative predictors of persistent postoperative leg numbness following lumbar fusion in older patients. Although lumbar fusion is expected to improve leg numbness, surgeons should consider the surgical history, duration, and preoperative numbness intensity and explain the potential postoperative persistent leg numbness in advance.

Impact of Preoperative Intervertebral Disc Degeneration on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Lumbar Fusion.

OBJECTIVE: The Pfirrmann scoring system classifies lumbosacral disc degeneration based on MRI signal intensity. The relationship between pre-existing disc degeneration and PROMs after one-level lumbar fusion is not well documented. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the severity of preoperative intervertebral disc degeneration and pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients undergoing one-level lumbar fusion. METHODS: All adult patients underwent posterior lumbar decompression and fusion (PLDF) or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) between 2014-2022 were included. Patient demographics, and comorbidities were extracted from medical records. Lumbar intervertebral discs on sagittal MRI T2-weighted images were assessed by two independent graders utilizing Pfirrmann criteria. Grades I-III were categorized as low-grade disc degeneration, while IV-V were considered high-grade. Multivariable linear regression assessed the impact of disc degeneration on PROMS. RESULTS: A total of 150 patients were included, of which, 69 (46%) had low grade disc degeneration, while 81 (54%) had high grade degeneration. Patients with high-grade degeneration had increased preoperative VAS-Leg scores (6.10 vs. 4.54, p=0.005) and displayed greater one-year postoperative improvements in VAS-Back scores (-2.11 vs -0.66, p=0.002). Multivariable regression demonstrated Pfirrmann scores as independent predictors for both preoperative VAS-Leg scores (p=0.004) and postoperative VAS-Back improvement (p=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing one-level lumbar fusion, higher Pfirmann scores were associated with increased preoperative leg pain and greater one-year postoperative improvement in back pain. Further studies into the relationship of pre-operative disc degeneration and their impact on postoperative outcomes may help guide clinical decision making and patient expectations.

Paraspinal muscle endurance and morphology (PMEM) score: a new method for prediction of postoperative mechanical complications after lumbar fusion.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Although the relationships between paraspinal muscles and lumbar degenerative disorders have been acknowledged, paraspinal muscle evaluation has not been incorporated into clinical therapies. PURPOSE: We aimed to establish a novel paraspinal muscle endurance and morphology (PMEM) score to better predict mechanical complications after lumbar fusion. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 212 patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion with at least 1 year of follow-up were finally included. OUTCOME MEASURES: Mechanical complications including screw loosening, pseudarthrosis and other complications like cage subsidence, and patient-reported outcomes were evaluated at last follow-up. METHODS: The PMEM score comprised 1 functional muscular parameter (the performance time of the endurance test) and 2 imaging muscular parameters (relative functional cross-sectional area [rFCSA] of paraspinal extensor muscles [PEM] and psoas major [PS] on magnetic resonance imaging). The score was established based on a weighted scoring system created by rounding ß regression coefficients to the nearest integer in univariate logistic regression. The diagnostic performance of the PMEM score was determined by binary logistic regression model and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve with the area under the curve (AUC). Additionally, pairwise comparisons of ROC curves were conducted to compare the diagnostic performance of the PMEM score with conventional methods based on a single muscular parameter. Moreover, differences of mechanical complications and patient-reported outcomes among the PMEM categories were analyzed using Chi-square test with Bonferroni correction. RESULTS: The PMEM score, calculated by adding the scores for each parameter, ranges from 0 to 5 points. Patients with higher PMEM scores exhibited higher rates of mechanical complications (p<.001). Binary logistic regression revealed that the PMEM score was an independent factor of mechanical complications (p<.001, OR=2.002). Moreover, the AUC of the PMEM score (AUC=0.756) was significantly greater than those of the conventional methods including the endurance test (AUC=0.691, Z=2.036, p<.05), PEM rFCSA (AUC=.690, Z=2.016, p<.05) and PS rFCSA (AUC=0.640, Z=2.771, p<.01). In terms of the PMEM categories, a score of 0-1 was categorized as low-risk muscular state of mechanical complications; 2-3, as moderate; and 4-5, as high-risk state. Moving from the low-risk state to the high-risk state, there was a progressive increase in the rates of mechanical complications (13.8% vs. 32.1% vs. 72.7%; p<.001), and a decrease in the rates of clinically significant improvement of patient-reported outcomes (all p<.05). CONCLUSIONS: The PMEM score might comprehensively evaluate paraspinal muscle degeneration and exhibit greater ability in predicting mechanical complications than the conventional evaluations after lumbar fusion. Surgeons might develop individualized treatment strategy tailored to different muscle degeneration statuses reflected by the PMEM score for decreasing the risk of mechanical complications.

Distal Lumbar Lordosis is Associated With Reoperation for Adjacent Segment Disease After Lumbar Fusion for Degenerative Conditions.

STUDY DESIGN: A single centre retrospective review. OBJECTIVE: Recent studies have suggested that distal lordosis (L4-S1, DL) remains constant across all pelvic incidence (PI) subgroups, whilst proximal lordosis (L1-L4, PL) varies. We sought to investigate the impact of post-operative DL on adjacent segment disease (ASD) requiring reoperation in patients undergoing lumbar fusion for degenerative conditions. METHODS: Patients undergoing 1-3 level lumbar fusion with the two senior authors between 2007-16 were included. Demographic and radiographic data were recorded. Univariate, multivariate binary logistic regression, and Kaplan Meier survivorship analyses were performed. RESULTS: 335 patients were included in the final analysis. Most had single (67%) or two (31%) level fusions. The mean follow-up was 64-month. Fifty-seven patients (17%) underwent reoperation for ASD at an average of 78-month post-operatively (R group). The R group had a significantly lower mean post-operative DL (27.3 vs 31.1 deg, P < .001) and mean PI (55.5 vs 59.2 deg, P < .05). On univariate analysis, patients with a post-operative DL of <35 deg had higher odds of reoperation for ASD than those with a post-operative DL of ≥35 deg (OR 2.7, P = .016). In the multivariate model, post-operative DL, low/average PI, and spondylolisthesis were all significantly associated with reoperation for ASD. CONCLUSION: This study provides preliminary support to an association between post-operative distal lumbar lordosis and risk of reoperation for ASD in patients undergoing fusions for degenerative conditions. Further multicentre prospective study is needed to independently confirm this association and identify the impact of restoration of physiological distal lumbar lordosis on long term patient outcomes.

Comparative effectiveness of cortical bone trajectory screws and pedicle screws in the treatment of adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar fusion surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screw and pedicle screw (PS) internal fixation in the treatment of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) after lumbar fusion. METHODS: This study was registered on International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (ID: CRD42023484937). We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan Fang Database, and Wei Pu Database by computer to collect controlled clinical studies on the efficacy and safety of cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screw and pedicle screw (PS) internal fixation in the treatment of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) after lumbar fusion from database establishment to November 2023. Two researchers screened the literature, extracted data and evaluated the risk of bias of the included studies, recorded the authors, and sample size, and extracted the intraoperative blood loss, operation time, Oswestry disability index (ODI), Visual analogue scale (VAS), disc height (DH), hospital length stay and complications in each study. Meta-analysis was performed using Revman 5.4 software provided by Cochrane Library. RESULTS: A total of 6 cohort studies (CS) and 1 randomized controlled study with a total of 420 patients were included in this study, including 188 patients in the CBT group and 232 patients in the PS group. The CBT group had lower intraoperative blood loss than the PS group [mean difference (MD) = -129.38, 95% CI (-177.22, -81.55), P < 0.00001] and operation time was shorter than that of the PS group [MD = -1.42, 95% CI (-2.63, -0.20), P = 0.02]. Early postoperative back and leg pain improved more significantly in the CBT group [MD = -0.77, 95% CI (-1.35, -0.19), P = 0.01; MD = -0.24, 95% CI (-0.37, -0.10), P = 0.0005]. CONCLUSION: Compared with PS, CBT for adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar fusion has the advantages of less intraoperative blood loss, shorter operation time, and less back and leg pain in the early postoperative period.

Comparative analysis of patient demographics, perioperative outcomes, and adverse events after lumbar spinal fusion between urban and rural hospitals: an analysis of the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database.

OBJECTIVE: Rural location of a patient's primary residence has been associated with worse clinical and surgical outcomes due to limited resource availability in these parts of the US. However, there is a paucity of literature investigating the effect that a rural hospital location may have on these outcomes specific to lumbar spine fusions. METHODS: Using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, we identified all patients who underwent primary lumbar spinal fusion in the years between 2009 and 2020. Patients were separated according to whether the operative hospital was considered rural or urban. Univariable and multivariable regression models were used for data analysis. RESULTS: Of 2,863,816 patients identified, 120,298 (4.2 %) had their operation at a rural hospital, with the remaining in an urban hospital. Patients in the urban cohort were younger (P < .001), more likely to have private insurance (39.81 % vs 31.95 %, P < .001), and fewer of them were in the first (22.52 % vs 43.00 %, P < .001) and second (25.96 % vs 38.90 %, P < .001) quartiles of median household income compared to the rural cohort. The urban cohort had significantly increased rates of respiratory (4.49 % vs 3.37 %), urinary (5.25 % vs 4.15 %), infectious (0.49 % vs 0.32 %), venous thrombotic (0.57 % vs 0.24 %, P < .001), and neurological (0.79 % vs 0.36 %) (all P < .001) perioperative complications. On multivariable analysis, the urban cohort had significantly increased odds of the same perioperative complications: respiratory (odds ratio[OR] = 1.48; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.26-1.74), urinary (OR = 1.34; 95 %CI, 1.20-1.50), infection (OR = 1.63; 95 %CI, 1.23-2.17), venous thrombotic (OR = 1.79; 95 %CI, 1.32-2.41), neurological injury (OR = 1.92; 95 %CI, 1.46-2.53), and localized infection (OR = 1.65; 95 %CI, 1.25-2.17) (all P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing lumbar fusions experience significantly different outcomes based on the rural or urban location of the operative hospital.

Effects of liposomal bupivacaine on opioid use and healthcare resource utilization after outpatient spine surgery: a real-world assessment.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Perioperative pain management affects cost and outcomes in elective spine surgery. PURPOSE: This study investigated the association between liposomal bupivacaine (LB) and outpatient spine surgery outcomes, including perioperative, postoperative, and postdischarge opioid use and healthcare resource utilization. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective comparative study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Eligibility criteria included adults with ≥6 months of continuous data before and after outpatient spine procedures including discectomy, laminectomy, or lumbar fusion. Patients receiving LB were matched 1:3 to patients receiving non-LB analgesia by propensity scores. OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes included (1) opioid use in morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) during the perioperative and postdischarge periods and (2) postdischarge readmission and emergency department (ED) visits up to 3 months after surgery. Generalized linear mixed-effects modeling with appropriate distributions was used for analysis. METHODS: Deidentified data from the IQVIA linkage claims databases (2016-2019) were used for the analysis. This study was funded by Pacira BioSciences, Inc. RESULTS: In total, 381 patients received LB and 1143 patients received non-LB analgesia. Baseline characteristics were well balanced after propensity score matching. The LB cohort used fewer MMEs versus the non-LB cohort before discharge (80 vs 132 MMEs [mean difference, -52 MMEs; p=.0041]). Following discharge, there was a nonsignificant reduction in opioid use in the LB cohort versus the non-LB cohort within 90 days (429 vs 480 MMEs [mean difference, -50 MMEs; p=.289]) and from >90 days to 180 days (349 vs 381 MMEs [mean difference, -31 MMEs; p=.507]). The LB cohort had significantly lower rates of ED visits at 2 months after discharge versus the non-LB cohort (3.9% vs 7.6% [odds ratio, 0.50; p=.015]). Postdischarge readmission rates did not differ between cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Use of LB for outpatient spine surgery was associated with reduced opioid use at the hospital and nonsignificant reduction in opioid use at all postoperative timepoints examined through 90 days after surgery versus non-LB analgesia. ED visit rates were significantly lower at 60 days after discharge. These findings support reduced cost and improved quality metrics in patients treated with LB versus non-LB analgesia for outpatient spine surgery.

Isolated decompression for degenerative spondylolisthesis is less costly than fusion even with high revision rates.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Isolated decompression and decompression with instrumented fusion are accepted surgical treatments for lumbar spondylolisthesis. Although isolated decompression is a less costly solution with similar patient-reported outcomes, it is associated with higher rates of re-operation than primary fusion. PURPOSE: To determine the costs associated with primary decompression, primary fusion, and decompression and fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis. We further sought to establish at what revision rate is primary decompression still a less costly surgical treatment for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A retrospective database study of the Medicare Provider Analysis and Review (MEDPAR) limited data set. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients who underwent single-level fusion or decompression for degenerative spondylolisthesis. OUTCOME MEASURES: Cost of surgical care. METHODS: All inpatient stays that underwent surgery for single-level lumbar/lumbosacral degenerative spondylolisthesis in the 2019 calendar year (n=6,653) were queried from the MEDPAR limited data set. Patients were stratified into three cohorts: primary decompression (n=300), primary fusion (n=5,757), and revision fusion (n=566). Univariate analysis was conducted to determine cost differences between these groups and results were confirmed with multivariable regression. An economic analysis was then done to determine at what revision rate would primary decompression still be a less costly treatment choice. RESULTS: on univariate analysis, the cost of primary single-level decompression for spondylolisthesis was $14,690±9,484, the cost of primary single-level fusion was $26,376±11,967, and revision fusion was $26,686±11,309 (p<0.001). on multivariate analysis, primary fusion was associated with an increased cost of $3,751, and revision fusion was associated with increased cost of $7,502 (95%ci: 2,990-4,512, p<0.001). economic analysis found that a revision rate less than or equal to 43.8% would still result in primary decompression being less costly for a practice than primary fusion for all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Isolated decompression for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis is a less costly treatment choice even with rates of revision fusion as high as 43.8%. This was true even with an assumed revision rate of 0% after primary fusion. This study solely looks at cost data, however, and many patients may still benefit from primary fusion when appropriately indicated.

Pseudarthrosis risk factors in lumbar fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

This study presents a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of pseudarthrosis risk factors following lumbar fusion procedures. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were used for outcome measurements. The objective of this study was to identify the independent risk factors for pseudarthrosis after lumbar spinal fusion, which is crucial for mitigating morbidity and reoperation. Systematic searches in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus (1990-July 2021) were conducted using specific terms. The inclusion criteria included prospective and retrospective cohorts and case‒control series reporting ORs with 95% CIs from multivariate analysis. The quality assessment utilized the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Meta-analysis, employing OR and 95% CI, assessed pseudarthrosis risk factors in lumbar fusion surgery, depicted in a forest plot. Of the 568 abstracts identified, 12 met the inclusion criteria (9 retrospective, 2006-2021). The 17 risk factors were categorized into clinical, radiographic, surgical, and bone turnover marker factors. The meta-analysis highlighted two significant clinical risk factors: age (95% CI 1.02-1.11; p = 0.005) and smoking (95% CI 1.68-5.44; p = 0.0002). The sole significant surgical risk factor was the number of fused levels (pooled OR 1.35; 95% CI 1.17-1.55; p < 0.0001). This study identified 17 risk factors for pseudarthrosis after lumbar fusion surgery, emphasizing age, smoking status, and the number of fusion levels. Prospective studies are warranted to explore additional risk factors and assess the impact of surgery and graft type.

The Impact of Outpatient Physical Therapy on Patient-Reported Outcomes After Lumbar Fusion: Perspective from A Bundled Care Dataset.

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: As value-based care grows in popularity across the United States, more payers have turned toward bundled payment models for surgical procedures. Though episode costs in spine are highly variable, physical therapy (PT) has been identified as a driver of 90-day cost. The goal of this study is to assess the impact of postoperative PT on patient-reported outcomes and cost after lumbar fusion surgery using bundled insurance data. METHODS: Bundled payment information of lumbar fusion episodes-of-care (EOC) from 2019 to 2021 was reviewed at a single, urban, tertiary care center. EOC comprised a 210-day period surrounding the date of the procedure, beginning 30 days preoperatively and ending 180 days postoperatively. Patients were grouped into physical therapy (PT) and no physical therapy (no PT) groups based on the presence of PT claims. RESULTS: Bivariate analysis of surgical outcomes revealed similar overall complication rates (P = 0.413), 30-day readmissions (P = 0.366), and 90-day readmissions (P = 0.774). Patients who did not participate in postoperative PT had significantly better preoperative physical component score (PCS) (P = 0.003), 6-month postoperative PCS (P = 0.001), and 6-month ΔPCS (P = 0.026) compared with patients who participated in postoperative PT. At 1-year follow-up, patients who did not participate in PT had less leg pain (P = 0.041) than those who did participate in PT. CONCLUSIONS: Our study finds that PT after lumbar fusion is not associated with significant improvement in Oswestry Disability Index, PCS, mental component score, or visual analog scale pain scores. Additionally, the number of PT sessions a patient attends has no correlation with improvement in these outcomes.

Prospective same day discharge instrumented lumbar spine surgery - a forty patient consecutive series.

PURPOSE: Outpatient lumbar decompression surgeries have been successfully performed in France for over twenty years, earning acceptance. However, outpatient instrumented lumbar spine procedures and arthroplasties are less documented. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, efficiency, and safety of outpatient lumbar instrumented surgery. METHODS: A prospective single-center study involving three experienced surgeons was conducted from September 2020 to September 2021, with a minimum six-month postoperative follow-up. Inclusion criteria comprised patients aged 18 to 75 eligible for same-day discharge, undergoing single-level lumbar spinal fusion or arthroplasty via anterior or posterior Wiltse approach. The primary endpoint was assessing the percentage of successful outpatient discharges (within twelve hours), with secondary endpoints including perioperative/postoperative complications and discharge pain prescriptions in terms of frequency and severity. RESULTS: Forty patients (mean age: 44 years; 16/24 male/female ratio) underwent surgery, including 18 lumbar arthroplasties, twelve ALIF, and ten TLIF procedures. The majority of surgeries were performed at L4-L5 (18 procedures) and L5-S1 levels (22 procedures). 95% (38/40) of patients were successfully discharged within twelve hours, with only two patients discharged the following day. No postoperative hematomas, serious adverse events, or revision surgeries were noted. CONCLUSION: 95% of patients were discharged successfully within twelve hours following outpatient lumbar fusion surgery, with a 100% patient satisfaction rate. Specific technical solutions were not necessary, and oral pain relief sufficed. Patient selection and education, including early pain management, played crucial roles in complication avoidance. This study underscores the safety of outpatient instrumented lumbar spine procedures, leading to cost reduction and expedited recovery.

The Effects of Longer Use of Teriparatide on Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes after Spinal Fusion in Geriatric Patients.

Background: Teriparatide is an anabolic agent for osteoporosis and is believed to improve the bone healing process. Previous studies showed that teriparatide could enhance not only fracture healing but also spine fusion. It has been reported that use of teriparatide could promote the spine fusion process and decrease mechanical complications. However, there was no consensus regarding optimal treatment duration. The purpose of this study was to compare surgical outcomes between short-duration and long-duration teriparatide treatment after lumbar fusion surgery in elderly patients. Materials and Methods: All consecutive patients older than 60 years who underwent 1-level lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative diseases between January 2015 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Based on the duration of teriparatide treatment (daily subcutaneous injection of 20 µg teriparatide), patients were subdivided into two groups: a short-duration (SD) group (<6 months) and a long-duration (LD) group (≥6 months). Mechanical complications, such as screw loosening, cage subsidence, and adjacent vertebral fractures, were investigated. Postoperative 1-year union rate was also evaluated on computed tomography. Clinical outcomes were recorded using visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Between-group differences for these radiographic and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Results: Ninety-one patients were reviewed in this study, including sixty patients in the SD group and thirty-one patients in the LD group. Their mean age was 72.3 ± 6.2 years, and 79 patients were female. Mean T-score was -3.3 ± 0.8. Cage subsidence (6.7% vs. 3.2%), screw loosening (28.3% vs. 35.5%), and adjacent vertebral fracture (6.7% vs. 9.7%) were not significantly different between the SD and LD groups. Union rate at 1-year postoperative was 65.0% in the SD group and 87.1% in the LD group (p = 0.028). Both groups showed improvement in VAS and ODI after surgery. However, the differences of VAS from preoperative to 6 months and 1 year postoperative were significantly higher in the LD group. Conclusions: Longer teriparatide treatment after lumbar fusion surgery resulted in a higher union rate at 1-year postoperative than the shorter treatment. Also, it could be more beneficial for clinical outcomes.

Impact of surgical risk factors for non-union on lumbar spinal fusion outcomes using cellular bone allograft at 24-months follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The current report investigates fusion rates and patient-reported outcomes following lumbar spinal surgery using cellular bone allograft (CBA) in patients with risk factors for non-union. METHODS: A prospective, open label study was conducted in subjects undergoing lumbar spinal fusion with CBA (NCT02969616) to assess fusion success rates and patient-reported outcomes in subjects with risk factors for non-union. Subjects were categorized into low-risk (≤ 1 risk factors) and high-risk (> 1 risk factors) groups. Radiographic fusion status was evaluated by an independent review of dynamic radiographs and CT scans. Patient-reported outcome measures included quality of life (EQ-5D), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analog Scales (VAS) for back and leg pain. Adverse event reporting was conducted throughout 24-months of follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 274 subjects were enrolled: 140 subjects (51.1%) were categorized into the high-risk group (> 1 risk factor) and 134 subjects (48.9%) into the low-risk group (≤ 1 risk factors). The overall mean age at screening was 58.8 years (SD 12.5) with a higher distribution of females (63.1%) than males (36.9%). No statistical difference in fusion rates were observed between the low-risk (90.0%) and high-risk (93.9%) groups (p > 0.05). A statistically significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes (EQ-5D, ODI and VAS) was observed at all time points (p < 0.05) in both low and high-risk groups. The low-risk group showed enhanced improvement at multiple timepoints in EQ-5D, ODI, VAS-Back pain and VAS-Leg pain scores compared to the high-risk group (p < 0.05). The number of AEs were similar among risk groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates high fusion rates following lumbar spinal surgery using CBA, regardless of associated risk factors. Patient reported outcomes and fusion rates were not adversely affected by risk factor profiles. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02969616 (21/11/2016).

The impact of nursing interventions on the rehabilitation outcome of patients after lumbar spine surgery.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the impact of nursing interventions on the rehabilitation outcomes of patients after lumbar spine surgery and to provide effective references for future postoperative care for patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. METHODS: The study included two groups: a control group receiving routine care and an observation group receiving additional comprehensive nursing care. The comprehensive care encompassed postoperative rehabilitation, pain, psychological, dietary management, and discharge planning. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey, self-rating depression scale (SDS) and self-rating anxiety scale(SAS) were used to assess physiological and psychological recovery. Blood albumin, haemoglobin, neutrophil counts, white blood cell counts, red blood cell counts, inflammatory markers (IL-6, IL-10, and IFN-γ) were measured, and the incidence of postoperative adverse reactions was also recorded. RESULTS: Patients in the observation group exhibited significantly improved VAS, ODI, SF-36, SDS and SAS scores assessments post-intervention compared to the control group (P < 0.05). Moreover, levels of IL-6, IL-10, and IFN-γ were more favorable in the observation group post-intervention (P < 0.05), indicating a reduction in inflammatory response. There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative adverse reactions between the groups (P > 0.05), suggesting that the comprehensive nursing interventions did not increase the risk of adverse effects. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive nursing interventions have a significant impact on the postoperative recovery outcomes of patients with LSS, alleviating pain, reducing inflammation levels, and improving the overall quality of patient recovery without increasing the patient burden. Therefore, in clinical practice, it is important to focus on comprehensive nursing interventions for patients with LSS to improve their recovery outcomes and quality of life.

Sickle Cell Disease Has No Impact on 10-Year Cumulative Incidence and Indications for Revision Lumbar Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Cohort Study. OBJECTIVES: Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) experience distinct physiological challenges that may alter surgical outcomes. There has been no research establishing 10-year lumbar fusion (LF) implant survivorship rates among individuals with SCD. This study aims to determine the 10-year cumulative incidence and indications for revision LF between patients with and without SCD. METHODS: A national database was queried to identify patients with and without SCD who underwent primary LF. SCD patients undergoing LF were propensity-score matched in a 1:4 ratio by age, gender, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) to a matched LF control. In total, 246 SCD patients were included along with 981 and 100,000 individuals in the matched and unmatched control cohorts, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was utilized to determine the 10-year cumulative incidence rates of revision LF. Furthermore, multivariable analysis using Cox proportional hazard modeling was performed to compare indications for revisions and surgical complications between cohorts including hardware removal, drainage and evacuation, pseudoarthrosis, and mechanical failure. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in the cumulative incidence of 10-year all-cause revision LF between patients in the SCD cohort and either of the control cohorts (P > .05 for each). Additionally, there were no significant differences between the SCD cohort and either of the control cohorts in regards to the indications for revision or surgical complications in LF (P > .05 for each). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that SCD patients do not have increased risk for revision LF, nor any of its indications.

Elevated Serum Alkaline Phosphatase is an Independent Predictor of Complications After Lumbar Spinal Fusion.

BACKGROUND: Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) is an enzyme which has been proven useful as a biomarker for bone turnover and inflammation. We hypothesized that high serum ALP levels are associated with increased complication rates following lumbar spinal fusion. METHODS: Lumbar spinal fusion procedures from 2005 to 2019 were queried from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Serum alkaline phosphatase levels were stratified into low <44 IU/L, normal 44-147 IU/L, and high >147 IU/L. A risk-adjusted multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze ALP as an independent risk factor for complications. RESULTS: A total of 16,441 patients who underwent lumbar fusion procedures were included. Adjusted multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that patients with a high serum ALP level had a significantly increased risk for developing septic shock (OR 4.68, 95% CI 1.83-11.97), pneumonia (OR 2.89, 95% CI 1.59-5.25), requiring a transfusion (OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.68-2.59), reoperation within 30 days (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.12-2.52), readmission within 30 days (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.16-2.21), increased length of stay (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.49-2.36), and nonhome discharge (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.80-2.66). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated serum ALP in patients undergoing lumbar fusion procedures is associated with increased risk for multiple in-hospital complications as well as higher rates of readmission and reoperation.