Antiplatelet effects of hydroxychloroquine in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus evaluated by the total thrombus-formation analysis system (T-TAS).

OBJECTIVES: Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has been shown to reduce thrombotic events in patients with SLE. However, the antiplatelet effects of HCQ are only supported by the platelet aggregation assay, which is a non-physiological test. The total thrombus-formation analysis system (T-TAS) is a microchip-based flow chamber system that mimics physiological conditions and allows for the quantitative analysis of thrombogenicity. The present study investigated the antiplatelet effects of HCQ using T-TAS. METHODS: This was a single-centre cross-sectional study on 57 patients with SLE. We measured the area under the pressure curve for 10 min (PL-AUC10) and the time to 10 kPa (T10) in patients with SLE using T-TAS and examined their relationships with the use of HCQ. PL-AUC10 and platelet aggregation were also measured at several HCQ concentrations using blood samples from healthy donors. RESULTS: PL-AUC10 was significantly lower in the HCQ/real body weight (RBW) ≥5 mg/kg group than in the <5 mg/kg group, while T10 was similar, indicating that HCQ inhibited overall thrombus formation rather than the initiation of thrombus formation. The antiplatelet effects of HCQ were initially detected at HCQ/RBW of approximately 4 mg/kg and reached a plateau at around 5.5 mg/kg. The administration of HCQ/RBW >4.6 mg/kg clearly exerted antiplatelet effects. Additionally, HCQ inhibited thrombus formation in T-TAS and the platelet aggregation response to epinephrine in a dose-dependent manner. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated the antiplatelet effects of HCQ under conditions simulating the physiological environment by using T-TAS and identified the range of doses at which HCQ exerted antiplatelet effects.

Inhibition of receptor interacting protein kinase-1 (RIPK1) in the treatment of murine lupus.

OBJECTIVE: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a type of autoimmune disease that involves multiple organs involved as well as cytokine dysregulation. The treatment of SLE is still challenging due to the side effects of the different drugs used. Receptor-interacting protein kinase 1 (RIPK1) is a kinase involved in T cell homeostasis and autoinflammation. Although clinical trials have shown that RIPK1 inhibition exhibits significant efficacy in different autoimmune diseases, its role in SLE remains unclear. METHODS: MRL/lpr lupus-prone mice received RIPK1 inhibitor ZJU37 or vehicle intraperitoneally for 10 weeks. A BM12-induced chronic graft-versus-host-disease (cGVHD) lupus-like model was introduced in RIPK1 D138N mice or C57BL/6 mice. Nephritis, serum autoantibody levels, dysregulation of adaptive immune response and cytokines were compared in treated and untreated mice. RESULTS: ZJU37 alleviated the clinical features of the MRL/lpr mice including nephritis and anti-dsDNA antibody production. In addition, ZJU37 treatment reduced the proportion of double-negative T cells in the spleen and the cytokines of TNFα, IFN-γ, IL-6, IL-17 and IL-1ß in the serum. Moreover, RIPK1 D138N mice were able to prevent the cGVHD lupus-like model from SLE attack, manifesting as anti-dsDNA antibody production, the proliferation of germinal centre B cells, plasma cells, and T follicular helper cells as well as IgG and C3 deposits in kidneys. CONCLUSION: RIPK1 inhibition has a protective effect in the mouse model of SLE and can potentially become a new therapeutic target for SLE in humans.

Multidisciplinary re-evaluation of neuropsychiatric events to confirm the neuropsychiatric lupus diagnosis at an Indonesian tertiary hospital.

OBJECTIVE: Neuropsychiatric SLE (NPSLE) has a broad spectrum and to date, there is no gold-standard biomarker. The diagnosis relies on clinical assessment, supporting examinations and exclusion of other possible aetiologies. One method that can be used to establish NPSLE is to conduct a re-evaluation by involving several fields of medical science. This study aims to reassess SLE cases with neuropsychiatric (NP) manifestations through multidisciplinary re-evaluation and determine the final diagnosis of NPSLE or non-NPSLE. METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study used medical record data from patients with SLE with NP manifestations. Inclusion criteria included patients diagnosed with SLE, who had clinical manifestations of NP and were >18 years old. Multidisciplinary re-evaluation was conducted and agreed upon the diagnosis of NPSLE or non-NPSLE. RESULTS: We included 94 subjects with a total of 132 NP events consisting of 69 NPSLE and 63 non-NPSLE. After re-evaluating NPSLE events, 33.3% were still concluded to be NPSLE. Meanwhile, from the non-NPSLE group, 22.2% were then declared as NPSLE. There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics between the NPSLE and non-NPSLE groups. The proportion of NP events in both groups was almost the same except for cerebrovascular disease manifestations which were more common in the NPSLE group. Higher Mexican SLE Disease Activity Index scores with (p<0.001) or without NP (p=0.02) were observed in the NPSLE group compared with the non-NPSLE group, as well as higher proportion of active disease (p=0.03), higher anti-double-stranded DNA titres (p<0.001) and lower values of C3 (p=0.018) and C4 (p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary re-evaluation can be used as a method to confirm the diagnosis of NPSLE. There is a tendency for overdiagnosis of NPSLE when clinicians are faced with NP events in patients with SLE. Complete clinical and supporting data are needed to determine the final diagnosis of NPSLE.

Value of SLE-DAS in assessing disease activity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a single-centre retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical value of the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS) for assessing disease activity in patients with SLE. METHODS: Clinical data were collected from patients with SLE who were admitted at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from January 2009 to December 2022. The glucocorticoid dose grading was used as the gold standard for disease activity assessment in SLE. The SLE-DAS value was calculated, and the SLE disease activity status was graded based on the SLE-DAS value. Another scoring criterion, the SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI 2000), served as a control. Spearman correlation analysis was used to calculate the correlation between the scoring criteria and other variables. RESULTS: The analysis included 396 patients with SLE. A strong correlation was found between SLE-DAS and SLEDAI 2000 (ρ=0.709, 95% CI 0.648 to 0.766, p<0.001), with median SLE-DAS and SLEDAI 2000 scores of 15.32 (7.90 to 24.45) and 13 (8 to 19), respectively. Compared with the SLEDAI 2000 value, the SLE-DAS value correlated better with glucocorticoid dose grading (ρ=0.434 vs 0.518), gammaglobulin use (ρ=0.170 vs 0.318) and immunosuppressant use (ρ=0.122 vs 0.221). A moderate correlation based on disease activity grading was found between SLE-DAS and glucocorticoid dose grading (ρ=0.441), whereas a mild correlation was observed between SLEDAI 2000 and glucocorticoid dose grading (ρ=0.325). Additionally, SLE-DAS revealed a positive correlation with severe thrombocytopenia, cardiac involvement and pulmonary involvement but not SLEDAI 2000. CONCLUSION: Compared with SLEDAI 2000, SLE-DAS may provide a more accurate disease activity assessment in patients with SLE, especially those with severe thrombocytopenia and cardiopulmonary involvement.

A cross sectional study assessing steatotic liver disease in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases are prone to steatotic liver disease (SLD), which has been observed in patients with psoriasis and hidradenitis suppurativa. We aimed to assess whether systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) was associated with SLD and to define factors associated with SLD in SLE. This was a cross-sectional study, we included 106 consecutive patients with SLE who were seen in the rheumatology clinic between June 2021 and March 2022 and we chose two sex-paired controls for each SLE. All the participants underwent FibroScan and anthropometric assessments. SLD was defined as a controlled attenuation parameter ≥ 275dB/m. Prevalence of SLD was lower in patients with SLE (21.7% vs 41.5%, p < 0.001). Patients with SLE and SLD had a lower frequency of hydroxychloroquine use (65% vs 84%, p = 0.04), and higher C3 levels [123mg/dl (IQR 102-136) vs 99mg/dl (IQR 78-121), p = 0.004]. Factors associated with SLD in SLE were body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, glucose, and C3; hydroxychloroquine use was a protective factor. On univariate analysis, SLE was associated with a reduced risk of SLD (OR 0.39, 95%CI 0.23-0.67); however, after adjusting for age, BMI, waist, glucose, triglycerides, high-density cholesterol, low-density cholesterol, leukocytes, and hydroxychloroquine, it was no longer associated (OR 0.43, 95%CI 0.10-1.91). In conclusion, the prevalence of SLD in patients with SLE was not higher than that in the general population, and SLE was not associated with SLD. The factors associated with SLD were anthropometric data, glucose, hydroxychloroquine, and C3 levels.

Haematopoietic stem cell-derived immune cells have reduced X chromosome inactivation skewing in systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVES: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) shows a marked female bias in prevalence. X chromosome inactivation (XCI) is the mechanism which randomly silences one X chromosome to equalise gene expression between 46, XX females and 46, XY males. Though XCI is expected to result in a random pattern of mosaicism across tissues, some females display a significantly skewed ratio in immune cells, termed XCI-skew. We tested whether XCI was abnormal in females with SLE and hence contributes to sexual dimorphism. METHODS: We assayed XCI in whole blood DNA in 181 female SLE cases, 796 female healthy controls and 10 twin pairs discordant for SLE. Using regression modelling and intra-twin comparisons, we assessed the effect of SLE on XCI and combined clinical, cellular and genetic data via a polygenic score to explore underlying mechanisms. RESULTS: Accommodating the powerful confounder of age, XCI-skew was reduced in females with SLE compared with controls (p=1.3×10-5), with the greatest effect seen in those with more severe disease. Applying an XCI threshold of >80%, we observed XCI-skew in 6.6% of SLE cases compared with 22% of controls. This difference was not explained by differential white cell counts, medication or genetic susceptibility to SLE. Instead, XCI-skew correlated with a biomarker for type I interferon-regulated gene expression. CONCLUSIONS: These results refute current views on XCI-skew in autoimmunity and suggest, in lupus, XCI patterns of immune cells reflect the impact of disease state, specifically interferon signalling, on the haematopoietic stem cells from which they derive.

Development and validation of a risk scoring system to identify patients with lupus nephritis in electronic health record data.

OBJECTIVE: Accurate identification of lupus nephritis (LN) cases is essential for patient management, research and public health initiatives. However, LN diagnosis codes in electronic health records (EHRs) are underused, hindering efficient identification. We investigated the current performance of International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes, 9th and 10th editions (ICD9/10), for identifying prevalent LN, and developed scoring systems to increase identification of LN that are adaptable to settings with and without LN ICD codes. METHODS: Training and test sets derived from EHR data from a large health system. An external set comprised data from the EHR of a second large health system. Adults with ICD9/10 codes for SLE were included. LN cases were ascertained through manual chart reviews conducted by rheumatologists. Two definitions of LN were used: strict (definite LN) and inclusive (definite, potential or diagnostic uncertainty). Gradient boosting models including structured EHR fields were used for predictor selection. Two logistic regression-based scoring systems were developed ('LN-Code' included LN ICD codes and 'LN-No Code' did not), calibrated and validated using standard performance metrics. RESULTS: A total of 4152 patients from University of California San Francisco Medical Center and 370 patients from Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center met the eligibility criteria. Mean age was 50 years, 87% were female. LN diagnosis codes demonstrated low sensitivity (43-73%) but high specificity (92-97%). LN-Code achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.93 and a sensitivity of 0.88 for identifying LN using the inclusive definition. LN-No Code reached an AUC of 0.91 and a sensitivity of 0.95 (0.97 for the strict definition). Both scoring systems had good external validity, calibration and performance across racial and ethnic groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study quantified the underutilisation of LN diagnosis codes in EHRs and introduced two adaptable scoring systems to enhance LN identification. Further validation in diverse healthcare settings is essential to ensure their broader applicability.

Remission and low disease activity are associated with lower healthcare costs: results from the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) inception cohort.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to determine the independent impact of definitions of remission/low disease activity (LDA) on direct/indirect costs (DCs, ICs) in a multicentre inception cohort. METHODS: Patients from 31 centres in 10 countries were enrolled within 15 months of diagnosis and assessed annually. Five mutually exclusive disease activity states (DAS) were defined as (1) remission off-treatment: clinical (c) SLEDAI-2K=0, without prednisone/immunosuppressants; (2) remission on-treatment: cSLEDAI-2K=0, prednisone ≤5 mg/day and/or maintenance immunosuppressants; (3) LDA-Toronto Cohort (TC): cSLEDAI-2K≤2, without prednisone/immunosuppressants; (4) modified lupus LDA state (mLLDAS): SLEDAI-2K≤4, no activity in major organs/systems, no new activity, prednisone ≤7.5 mg/day and/or maintenance immunosuppressants and (5) active: all remaining assessments.At each assessment, patients were stratified into the most stringent DAS fulfilled and the proportion of time in a DAS since cohort entry was determined. Annual DCs/ICs (2021 Canadian dollars) were based on healthcare use and lost workforce/non-workforce productivity over the preceding year.The association between the proportion of time in a DAS and annual DC/IC was examined through multivariable random-effects linear regressions. RESULTS: 1692 patients were followed a mean of 9.7 years; 49.0% of assessments were active. Remission/LDA (per 25% increase in time in a remission/LDA state vs active) were associated with lower annual DC/IC: remission off-treatment (DC -$C1372; IC -$C2507), remission on-treatment (DC -$C973; IC -$C2604,) LDA-TC (DC -$C1158) and mLLDAS (DC -$C1040). There were no cost differences between remission/LDA states. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that systemic lupus erythematosus patients who achieve remission, both off and on-therapy, and reductions in disease activity incur lower costs than those experiencing persistent disease activity.

Blood RNA-sequencing across the continuum of ANA-positive autoimmunity reveals insights into initiating immunopathology.

OBJECTIVE: Mechanisms underpinning clinical evolution to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) from preceding antinuclear antibodies (ANA) positivity are poorly understood. This study aimed to understand blood immune cell transcriptional signatures associated with subclinical ANA positivity, and progression or non-progression to SLE. METHODS: Bulk RNA-sequencing of peripheral blood mononuclear cells isolated at baseline from 35 ANA positive (ANA+) subjects with non-diagnostic symptoms was analysed using differential gene expression, weighted gene co-expression network analysis, deconvolution of cell subsets and functional enrichment analyses. ANA+ subjects, including those progressing to classifiable SLE at 12 months (n=15) and those with stable subclinical ANA positivity (n=20), were compared with 15 healthy subjects and 18 patients with SLE. RESULTS: ANA+ subjects demonstrated extensive transcriptomic dysregulation compared with healthy controls with reduced CD4+naïve T-cells and resting NK cells, but higher activated dendritic cells. B-cell lymphopenia was evident in SLE but not ANA+ subjects. Two-thirds of dysregulated genes were common to ANA+ progressors and non-progressors. ANA+ progressors showed elevated modular interferon signature in which constituent genes were inducible by both type I interferon (IFN-I) and type II interferon (IFN-II) in vitro. Baseline downregulation of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation complex I components significantly associated with progression to SLE but did not directly correlate with IFN modular activity. Non-progressors demonstrated more diverse cytokine profiles. CONCLUSIONS: ANA positivity, irrespective of clinical trajectory, is profoundly dysregulated and transcriptomically closer to SLE than to healthy immune function. Metabolic derangements and IFN-I activation occur early in the ANA+ preclinical phase and associated with diverging transcriptomic profiles which distinguish subsequent clinical evolution.

Combination of anti-SSA/Ro60 and anti-dsDNA serotype is predictive of belimumab renal response in patients with lupus nephritis.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effectiveness of belimumab on active lupus nephritis (LN) and explore the predictors, including serological biomarkers, of renal response to belimumab in a real-world setting. METHODS: This multicentre, real-world observational study enrolled patients with active LN receiving intravenous belimumab as an add-on therapy with 24-hour urine protein≥1 g and estimated glomerular filtration rate≥30 mL/min/1.73 m2 at baseline. Complete renal response (CRR), partial renal response (PRR), no renal response (NRR) and primary efficacy renal response (PERR) were evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for NRR to belimumab at 6 months. RESULTS: Among the 122 patients enrolled, the proportions of patients achieving CRR, PRR, NRR and PERR were 35.9%, 17.1%, 47.0% and 44.4% at 6 months (n=117) and 55.6%, 19.4%, 26.4% and 58.3% at 12 months (n=72), respectively. Proteinuria, daily prednisone dosage and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 scores significantly decreased at 6 and 12 months (p<0.0001). NRR at 6 months (NRR6) was the strongest negative predictor of CRR at 12 months. Baseline anti-dsDNA positivity inversely predicted NRR6 (OR=0.32,95% CI=0.10 to 0.98, p=0.049), while anti-SSA/Ro60 positively predicted NRR6 (OR=3.16, 95% CI=1.14 to 8.74, p=0.027). The combination of anti-SSA/Ro60 and anti-dsDNA serotype quantitatively predicted belimumab renal response. CONCLUSION: The effectiveness of belimumab was reproducible in Chinese patients with active LN. The simple yet interesting serotype predictive model needs further validation and its possible underlying mechanistic relevance deserves further exploration.

BCMA-CD19 compound CAR T cells for systemic lupus erythematosus: a phase 1 open-label clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BCMA-CD19 compound chimeric antigen receptor T cells (cCAR) to dual reset the humoral and B cell immune system in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with lupus nephritis (LN). METHODS: This is a single-arm open-label multicentre phase 1 study of BCMA and CD19-directed cCAR in patients suffering from SLE/LN with autoantibodies produced by B cells and plasma/long-lived plasma cells. In this clinical trial, we sequentially assigned biopsy-confirmed (classes III-V) LN patients to receive 3×106 cCAR cells/kg postcessation of all SLE medications and conditioning. The primary endpoint of safety and toxicity was assessed. Complete immune reset was indicated by B cell receptor (BCR) deep sequencing and flow cytometry analysis. Patient 11 (P11) had insufficient lymphocyte counts and was underdosed as compassionate use. RESULTS: P1 and P2 achieved symptom and medication-free remission (MFR) from SLE and complete remission from lymphoma. P3-P13 (excluding P11) received an initial dose of 3×106 cCAR cells /kg and were negative for all autoantibodies, including those derived from long-lived plasma cells, 3 months post-cCAR and the complement returned to normal levels. These patients achieved symptom and MFR with post-cCAR follow-up to 46 months. Complete recovery of B cells was seen in 2-6 months post-cCAR. Mean SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 reduced from 10.6 (baseline) to 2.7 (3 months), and renal function significantly improved in 10 LN patients ≤90 days post-cCAR. cCAR T therapy was well tolerant with mild cytokine-release syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Data suggest that cCAR therapy was safe and effective in inducing MFR and depleting disease-causing autoantibodies in patients with SLE.

Frequency of sarcopenia in Turkish women with systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of sarcopenia and its clinical significance in Turkish women with SLE, exploring the association between muscle mass, muscle strength and SLE disease activity. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted at Gazi University Hospital's Department of Rheumatology from January to December 2020. It involved 82 patients with SLE, diagnosed according to the 2019 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology criteria, and 69 healthy controls. Sarcopenia was assessed using hand grip dynamometry (hand grip strength (HGS)) and bioelectrical impedance analysis for muscle mass, with sarcopenia defined according to the 2018 European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People criteria and specific cut-offs for the Turkish population. The main outcomes measured were the presence of sarcopenia and probable sarcopenia, HGS values, skeletal muscle mass index and SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K). RESULTS: Among the patients with SLE, 51.2% met the criteria for probable sarcopenia and 12.9% were diagnosed with sarcopenia. The mean HGS was significantly lower in the SLE group (21.7±4.9 kg) compared with controls, indicating reduced muscle strength. The prevalence of anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibodies was 82.9%. Multivariate regression analysis identified height and levels of anti-dsDNA antibodies as independent predictors for developing probable sarcopenia. No significant association was found between clinical parameters, including SLEDAI-2K scores, and sarcopenia status. CONCLUSIONS: Sarcopenia is prevalent among Turkish women with SLE, with a significant proportion showing reduced muscle strength. The study found no direct association between sarcopenia and SLE disease activity or clinical parameters. These findings underscore the importance of including muscle strength assessments in the routine clinical evaluation of patients with SLE to potentially improve management and quality of life.

SF-36v2 and FACIT-Fatigue quality of life improvements with organ-specific SELENA-SLEDAI response and belimumab treatment in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: Explore organ-specific SLE burden by assessing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and fatigue changes associated with Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) organ system response (score improvement) and belimumab treatment. METHODS: Data from four phase III belimumab trials were pooled for post hoc analysis (GSK Study 217382): BLISS-52 (NCT00424476), BLISS-76 (NCT00410384), BLISS-SC (NCT01484496) and EMBRACE (NCT01632241). Patients with baseline organ system involvement were classed as organ system responders if SELENA-SLEDAI scores for that organ system decreased at any post-baseline visit. HRQoL (36-Item Short Form Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2)) and fatigue (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue)) changes over 52 weeks were compared between organ system responders and non-responders, and separately between belimumab versus placebo treatment arms among organ system responders. Group-level differences were compared using analysis of variance; differences were interpreted using published group-level minimal important difference (MID). RESULTS: In these post hoc analyses, musculoskeletal and mucocutaneous organ system responders had greater SF-36v2 improvements than non-responders across most SF-36v2 domains, but differences were largely MID), with FACIT-Fatigue also improving >MID for renal responders receiving belimumab. CONCLUSIONS: SLE disease burden differs with the organ system(s) involved. While these analyses are limited by mutual inclusivity of organ system groupings, differing patient numbers between groups and small numbers in some groups, they suggest that mucocutaneous and musculoskeletal organ system response improves SF-36v2 domain scores; cardiovascular and respiratory organ system response may meaningfully improve fatigue; and belimumab may offer additional HRQoL or fatigue benefits beyond standard therapy for musculoskeletal and renal responders.

Advances in the pharmacological management of systemic lupus erythematosus.

INTRODUCTION: Despite setbacks in clinical trials for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), three drugs have been approved for SLE and lupus nephritis (LN) treatment in the past decade. Several ongoing clinical trials, some viewed optimistically by the scientific community, underscore the evolving landscape. Emerging clinical data have established specific therapeutic targets in routine clinical practice for treating SLE, aiming to improve long-term outcomes. AREAS COVERED: Research related to treatment of SLE and LN is discussed, focusing on randomized clinical trials during the last 5 years and recommendations for the management of SLE published by the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR), American College of Rheumatology (ACR), Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology (APLAR), and Pan-American League of Associations of Rheumatology (PANLAR). EXPERT OPINION: The landscape of SLE and LN treatments is evolving, as new drugs and combination treatment approaches redefine the traditional concepts of induction and maintenance treatment phases. As the therapeutic armamentarium in SLE continues to expand, the research focus is shifting from the imperative for new therapies to advancing our understanding of optimal treatment selection for individual patients, steering toward precision medicine strategies.

Efficacy and safety of telitacicept therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus with hematological involvement.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of telitacicept in SLE patients specifically with hematological involvement. METHOD: A total of 22 patients with SLE and hematological involvement were included in this study. These patients received telitacicept in addition to standard therapy. We compared their demographic characteristics, clinical manifestations, and laboratory indicators before and after the administration of telitacicept. RESULTS: A total of 22 patients received telitacicept treatment for a median duration of 10.4 months (ranging from 6 to 19 months). Following telitacicept therapy, significant improvements were observed in various parameters compared to baseline. Specifically, white blood cell count increased from (3.98 ± 1.80) 109/L to (6.70 ± 2.47) 109/L, (P = 0.002), hemoglobin levels increased from (100 ± 19) g/L to (125 ± 22) g/L, (P < 0.001), and platelet count increased from (83 ± 60) 109/L to (161 ± 81) 109/L, (P = 0.004). SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) scores decreased from 12(5,15) to 0(0,4), (P < 0.001). Additionally, C3 and C4 levels showed improvement. Telitacicept treatment also resulted in a significant reduction in serum IgG levels and daily prednisone dosage. Only one adverse event (4.5%) was reported during the treatment, which was a urinary tract infection. CONCLUSION: The combination of telitacicept and standard treatment demonstrated significant improvements in anemia, as well as increased leukocyte and platelet levels in patients with SLE and hematological involvement. Importantly, the observed adverse events were manageable and controllable. Key Points • Telitacicept effectively improves anemia, clinical outcomes, and increases leukocyte and platelet counts. • Treatment with telitacicept leads to decreased levels of lgG, IgA, anti-dsDNA, and SLEDAI scores, while serum complement C3 and C4 returned to normal. • During the follow-up period there were observed changes in individual parameters, clinical symptoms, and organ involvement, all without significant adverse events.

iTRAQ-based mass spectrometry screen to identify serum biomarkers in systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex systemic autoimmune disorder with no reliable serum biomarkers currently available other than autoantibodies. METHODS: In the present study, isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation-based mass spectrometry was used to screen the sera of patients with SLE to uncover potential disease biomarkers. RESULTS: 85 common proteins were identified, with 16 being elevated (≥1.3) and 23 being decreased (≤0.7) in SLE. Of the 16 elevated proteins, serum alpha-1-microglobulin/bikunin precursor (AMBP), zinc alpha-2 glycoprotein (AZGP) and retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP4) were validated in independent cross-sectional cohorts (Cohort I, N=52; Cohort II, N=117) using an orthogonal platform, ELISA. Serum AMBP, AZGP and RBP4 were validated to be significantly elevated in both patients with inactive SLE and patients with active SLE compared with healthy controls (HCs) (p<0.05, fold change >2.5) in Cohort I. All three proteins exhibited good discriminatory power for distinguishing active SLE and inactive SLE (area under the curve=0.82-0.96), from HCs. Serum AMBP exhibited the largest fold change in active SLE (5.96) compared with HCs and correlated with renal disease activity. The elevation in serum AMBP was validated in a second cohort of patients with SLE of different ethnic origins, correlating with serum creatinine (r=0.60, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Since serum AMBP is validated to be elevated in SLE and correlated with renal disease, the clinical utility of this novel biomarker warrants further analysis in longitudinal cohorts of patients with lupus and lupus nephritis.