Multidisciplinary re-evaluation of neuropsychiatric events to confirm the neuropsychiatric lupus diagnosis at an Indonesian tertiary hospital.

OBJECTIVE: Neuropsychiatric SLE (NPSLE) has a broad spectrum and to date, there is no gold-standard biomarker. The diagnosis relies on clinical assessment, supporting examinations and exclusion of other possible aetiologies. One method that can be used to establish NPSLE is to conduct a re-evaluation by involving several fields of medical science. This study aims to reassess SLE cases with neuropsychiatric (NP) manifestations through multidisciplinary re-evaluation and determine the final diagnosis of NPSLE or non-NPSLE. METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study used medical record data from patients with SLE with NP manifestations. Inclusion criteria included patients diagnosed with SLE, who had clinical manifestations of NP and were >18 years old. Multidisciplinary re-evaluation was conducted and agreed upon the diagnosis of NPSLE or non-NPSLE. RESULTS: We included 94 subjects with a total of 132 NP events consisting of 69 NPSLE and 63 non-NPSLE. After re-evaluating NPSLE events, 33.3% were still concluded to be NPSLE. Meanwhile, from the non-NPSLE group, 22.2% were then declared as NPSLE. There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics between the NPSLE and non-NPSLE groups. The proportion of NP events in both groups was almost the same except for cerebrovascular disease manifestations which were more common in the NPSLE group. Higher Mexican SLE Disease Activity Index scores with (p<0.001) or without NP (p=0.02) were observed in the NPSLE group compared with the non-NPSLE group, as well as higher proportion of active disease (p=0.03), higher anti-double-stranded DNA titres (p<0.001) and lower values of C3 (p=0.018) and C4 (p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary re-evaluation can be used as a method to confirm the diagnosis of NPSLE. There is a tendency for overdiagnosis of NPSLE when clinicians are faced with NP events in patients with SLE. Complete clinical and supporting data are needed to determine the final diagnosis of NPSLE.

Value of SLE-DAS in assessing disease activity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a single-centre retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical value of the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS) for assessing disease activity in patients with SLE. METHODS: Clinical data were collected from patients with SLE who were admitted at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from January 2009 to December 2022. The glucocorticoid dose grading was used as the gold standard for disease activity assessment in SLE. The SLE-DAS value was calculated, and the SLE disease activity status was graded based on the SLE-DAS value. Another scoring criterion, the SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI 2000), served as a control. Spearman correlation analysis was used to calculate the correlation between the scoring criteria and other variables. RESULTS: The analysis included 396 patients with SLE. A strong correlation was found between SLE-DAS and SLEDAI 2000 (ρ=0.709, 95% CI 0.648 to 0.766, p<0.001), with median SLE-DAS and SLEDAI 2000 scores of 15.32 (7.90 to 24.45) and 13 (8 to 19), respectively. Compared with the SLEDAI 2000 value, the SLE-DAS value correlated better with glucocorticoid dose grading (ρ=0.434 vs 0.518), gammaglobulin use (ρ=0.170 vs 0.318) and immunosuppressant use (ρ=0.122 vs 0.221). A moderate correlation based on disease activity grading was found between SLE-DAS and glucocorticoid dose grading (ρ=0.441), whereas a mild correlation was observed between SLEDAI 2000 and glucocorticoid dose grading (ρ=0.325). Additionally, SLE-DAS revealed a positive correlation with severe thrombocytopenia, cardiac involvement and pulmonary involvement but not SLEDAI 2000. CONCLUSION: Compared with SLEDAI 2000, SLE-DAS may provide a more accurate disease activity assessment in patients with SLE, especially those with severe thrombocytopenia and cardiopulmonary involvement.

iTRAQ-based mass spectrometry screen to identify serum biomarkers in systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex systemic autoimmune disorder with no reliable serum biomarkers currently available other than autoantibodies. METHODS: In the present study, isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation-based mass spectrometry was used to screen the sera of patients with SLE to uncover potential disease biomarkers. RESULTS: 85 common proteins were identified, with 16 being elevated (≥1.3) and 23 being decreased (≤0.7) in SLE. Of the 16 elevated proteins, serum alpha-1-microglobulin/bikunin precursor (AMBP), zinc alpha-2 glycoprotein (AZGP) and retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP4) were validated in independent cross-sectional cohorts (Cohort I, N=52; Cohort II, N=117) using an orthogonal platform, ELISA. Serum AMBP, AZGP and RBP4 were validated to be significantly elevated in both patients with inactive SLE and patients with active SLE compared with healthy controls (HCs) (p<0.05, fold change >2.5) in Cohort I. All three proteins exhibited good discriminatory power for distinguishing active SLE and inactive SLE (area under the curve=0.82-0.96), from HCs. Serum AMBP exhibited the largest fold change in active SLE (5.96) compared with HCs and correlated with renal disease activity. The elevation in serum AMBP was validated in a second cohort of patients with SLE of different ethnic origins, correlating with serum creatinine (r=0.60, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Since serum AMBP is validated to be elevated in SLE and correlated with renal disease, the clinical utility of this novel biomarker warrants further analysis in longitudinal cohorts of patients with lupus and lupus nephritis.

BCMA-CD19 compound CAR T cells for systemic lupus erythematosus: a phase 1 open-label clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BCMA-CD19 compound chimeric antigen receptor T cells (cCAR) to dual reset the humoral and B cell immune system in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with lupus nephritis (LN). METHODS: This is a single-arm open-label multicentre phase 1 study of BCMA and CD19-directed cCAR in patients suffering from SLE/LN with autoantibodies produced by B cells and plasma/long-lived plasma cells. In this clinical trial, we sequentially assigned biopsy-confirmed (classes III-V) LN patients to receive 3×106 cCAR cells/kg postcessation of all SLE medications and conditioning. The primary endpoint of safety and toxicity was assessed. Complete immune reset was indicated by B cell receptor (BCR) deep sequencing and flow cytometry analysis. Patient 11 (P11) had insufficient lymphocyte counts and was underdosed as compassionate use. RESULTS: P1 and P2 achieved symptom and medication-free remission (MFR) from SLE and complete remission from lymphoma. P3-P13 (excluding P11) received an initial dose of 3×106 cCAR cells /kg and were negative for all autoantibodies, including those derived from long-lived plasma cells, 3 months post-cCAR and the complement returned to normal levels. These patients achieved symptom and MFR with post-cCAR follow-up to 46 months. Complete recovery of B cells was seen in 2-6 months post-cCAR. Mean SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 reduced from 10.6 (baseline) to 2.7 (3 months), and renal function significantly improved in 10 LN patients ≤90 days post-cCAR. cCAR T therapy was well tolerant with mild cytokine-release syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Data suggest that cCAR therapy was safe and effective in inducing MFR and depleting disease-causing autoantibodies in patients with SLE.

Advances in the pharmacological management of systemic lupus erythematosus.

INTRODUCTION: Despite setbacks in clinical trials for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), three drugs have been approved for SLE and lupus nephritis (LN) treatment in the past decade. Several ongoing clinical trials, some viewed optimistically by the scientific community, underscore the evolving landscape. Emerging clinical data have established specific therapeutic targets in routine clinical practice for treating SLE, aiming to improve long-term outcomes. AREAS COVERED: Research related to treatment of SLE and LN is discussed, focusing on randomized clinical trials during the last 5 years and recommendations for the management of SLE published by the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR), American College of Rheumatology (ACR), Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology (APLAR), and Pan-American League of Associations of Rheumatology (PANLAR). EXPERT OPINION: The landscape of SLE and LN treatments is evolving, as new drugs and combination treatment approaches redefine the traditional concepts of induction and maintenance treatment phases. As the therapeutic armamentarium in SLE continues to expand, the research focus is shifting from the imperative for new therapies to advancing our understanding of optimal treatment selection for individual patients, steering toward precision medicine strategies.

Frequency of sarcopenia in Turkish women with systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of sarcopenia and its clinical significance in Turkish women with SLE, exploring the association between muscle mass, muscle strength and SLE disease activity. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted at Gazi University Hospital's Department of Rheumatology from January to December 2020. It involved 82 patients with SLE, diagnosed according to the 2019 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology criteria, and 69 healthy controls. Sarcopenia was assessed using hand grip dynamometry (hand grip strength (HGS)) and bioelectrical impedance analysis for muscle mass, with sarcopenia defined according to the 2018 European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People criteria and specific cut-offs for the Turkish population. The main outcomes measured were the presence of sarcopenia and probable sarcopenia, HGS values, skeletal muscle mass index and SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K). RESULTS: Among the patients with SLE, 51.2% met the criteria for probable sarcopenia and 12.9% were diagnosed with sarcopenia. The mean HGS was significantly lower in the SLE group (21.7±4.9 kg) compared with controls, indicating reduced muscle strength. The prevalence of anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibodies was 82.9%. Multivariate regression analysis identified height and levels of anti-dsDNA antibodies as independent predictors for developing probable sarcopenia. No significant association was found between clinical parameters, including SLEDAI-2K scores, and sarcopenia status. CONCLUSIONS: Sarcopenia is prevalent among Turkish women with SLE, with a significant proportion showing reduced muscle strength. The study found no direct association between sarcopenia and SLE disease activity or clinical parameters. These findings underscore the importance of including muscle strength assessments in the routine clinical evaluation of patients with SLE to potentially improve management and quality of life.

SF-36v2 and FACIT-Fatigue quality of life improvements with organ-specific SELENA-SLEDAI response and belimumab treatment in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: Explore organ-specific SLE burden by assessing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and fatigue changes associated with Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) organ system response (score improvement) and belimumab treatment. METHODS: Data from four phase III belimumab trials were pooled for post hoc analysis (GSK Study 217382): BLISS-52 (NCT00424476), BLISS-76 (NCT00410384), BLISS-SC (NCT01484496) and EMBRACE (NCT01632241). Patients with baseline organ system involvement were classed as organ system responders if SELENA-SLEDAI scores for that organ system decreased at any post-baseline visit. HRQoL (36-Item Short Form Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2)) and fatigue (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue)) changes over 52 weeks were compared between organ system responders and non-responders, and separately between belimumab versus placebo treatment arms among organ system responders. Group-level differences were compared using analysis of variance; differences were interpreted using published group-level minimal important difference (MID). RESULTS: In these post hoc analyses, musculoskeletal and mucocutaneous organ system responders had greater SF-36v2 improvements than non-responders across most SF-36v2 domains, but differences were largely MID), with FACIT-Fatigue also improving >MID for renal responders receiving belimumab. CONCLUSIONS: SLE disease burden differs with the organ system(s) involved. While these analyses are limited by mutual inclusivity of organ system groupings, differing patient numbers between groups and small numbers in some groups, they suggest that mucocutaneous and musculoskeletal organ system response improves SF-36v2 domain scores; cardiovascular and respiratory organ system response may meaningfully improve fatigue; and belimumab may offer additional HRQoL or fatigue benefits beyond standard therapy for musculoskeletal and renal responders.

The role of DNA in the pathogenesis of SLE: DNA as a molecular chameleon.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a prototypic autoimmune disease characterised by antibodies to DNA (anti-DNA) and other nuclear macromolecules. Anti-DNA antibodies are markers for classification and disease activity and promote pathogenesis by forming immune complexes that deposit in the tissue or stimulate cytokine production. Studies on the antibody response to DNA have focused primarily on a conformation of DNA known as B-DNA, the classic right-handed double helix. Among other conformations of DNA, Z-DNA is a left-handed helix with a zig-zag backbone; hence, the term Z-DNA. Z-DNA formation is favoured by certain base sequences, with the energetically unfavourable flip from B-DNA to Z-DNA dependent on conditions. Z-DNA differs from B-DNA in its immunogenicity in animal models. Furthermore, anti-Z-DNA antibodies, but not anti-B-DNA antibodies, can be present in otherwise healthy individuals. In SLE, antibodies to Z-DNA can occur in association with antibodies to B-DNA as a cross-reactive response, rising and falling together. While formed transiently in chromosomal DNA, Z-DNA is stably present in bacterial biofilms; biofilms can provide protection against antibiotics and other challenges including elements of host defence. The high GC content of certain bacterial DNA also favours Z-DNA formation as do DNA-binding proteins of bacterial or host origin. Together, these findings suggest that sources of Z-DNA can enhance the immunogenicity of DNA and, in SLE, stimulate the production of cross-reactive antibodies that bind both B-DNA and Z-DNA. As such, DNA can act as a molecular chameleon that, when stabilised in the Z-DNA conformation, can drive autoimmunity.

Efficacy and safety of telitacicept therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus with hematological involvement.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of telitacicept in SLE patients specifically with hematological involvement. METHOD: A total of 22 patients with SLE and hematological involvement were included in this study. These patients received telitacicept in addition to standard therapy. We compared their demographic characteristics, clinical manifestations, and laboratory indicators before and after the administration of telitacicept. RESULTS: A total of 22 patients received telitacicept treatment for a median duration of 10.4 months (ranging from 6 to 19 months). Following telitacicept therapy, significant improvements were observed in various parameters compared to baseline. Specifically, white blood cell count increased from (3.98 ± 1.80) 109/L to (6.70 ± 2.47) 109/L, (P = 0.002), hemoglobin levels increased from (100 ± 19) g/L to (125 ± 22) g/L, (P < 0.001), and platelet count increased from (83 ± 60) 109/L to (161 ± 81) 109/L, (P = 0.004). SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) scores decreased from 12(5,15) to 0(0,4), (P < 0.001). Additionally, C3 and C4 levels showed improvement. Telitacicept treatment also resulted in a significant reduction in serum IgG levels and daily prednisone dosage. Only one adverse event (4.5%) was reported during the treatment, which was a urinary tract infection. CONCLUSION: The combination of telitacicept and standard treatment demonstrated significant improvements in anemia, as well as increased leukocyte and platelet levels in patients with SLE and hematological involvement. Importantly, the observed adverse events were manageable and controllable. Key Points • Telitacicept effectively improves anemia, clinical outcomes, and increases leukocyte and platelet counts. • Treatment with telitacicept leads to decreased levels of lgG, IgA, anti-dsDNA, and SLEDAI scores, while serum complement C3 and C4 returned to normal. • During the follow-up period there were observed changes in individual parameters, clinical symptoms, and organ involvement, all without significant adverse events.

Combination of anti-SSA/Ro60 and anti-dsDNA serotype is predictive of belimumab renal response in patients with lupus nephritis.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effectiveness of belimumab on active lupus nephritis (LN) and explore the predictors, including serological biomarkers, of renal response to belimumab in a real-world setting. METHODS: This multicentre, real-world observational study enrolled patients with active LN receiving intravenous belimumab as an add-on therapy with 24-hour urine protein≥1 g and estimated glomerular filtration rate≥30 mL/min/1.73 m2 at baseline. Complete renal response (CRR), partial renal response (PRR), no renal response (NRR) and primary efficacy renal response (PERR) were evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for NRR to belimumab at 6 months. RESULTS: Among the 122 patients enrolled, the proportions of patients achieving CRR, PRR, NRR and PERR were 35.9%, 17.1%, 47.0% and 44.4% at 6 months (n=117) and 55.6%, 19.4%, 26.4% and 58.3% at 12 months (n=72), respectively. Proteinuria, daily prednisone dosage and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 scores significantly decreased at 6 and 12 months (p<0.0001). NRR at 6 months (NRR6) was the strongest negative predictor of CRR at 12 months. Baseline anti-dsDNA positivity inversely predicted NRR6 (OR=0.32,95% CI=0.10 to 0.98, p=0.049), while anti-SSA/Ro60 positively predicted NRR6 (OR=3.16, 95% CI=1.14 to 8.74, p=0.027). The combination of anti-SSA/Ro60 and anti-dsDNA serotype quantitatively predicted belimumab renal response. CONCLUSION: The effectiveness of belimumab was reproducible in Chinese patients with active LN. The simple yet interesting serotype predictive model needs further validation and its possible underlying mechanistic relevance deserves further exploration.

Blood RNA-sequencing across the continuum of ANA-positive autoimmunity reveals insights into initiating immunopathology.

OBJECTIVE: Mechanisms underpinning clinical evolution to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) from preceding antinuclear antibodies (ANA) positivity are poorly understood. This study aimed to understand blood immune cell transcriptional signatures associated with subclinical ANA positivity, and progression or non-progression to SLE. METHODS: Bulk RNA-sequencing of peripheral blood mononuclear cells isolated at baseline from 35 ANA positive (ANA+) subjects with non-diagnostic symptoms was analysed using differential gene expression, weighted gene co-expression network analysis, deconvolution of cell subsets and functional enrichment analyses. ANA+ subjects, including those progressing to classifiable SLE at 12 months (n=15) and those with stable subclinical ANA positivity (n=20), were compared with 15 healthy subjects and 18 patients with SLE. RESULTS: ANA+ subjects demonstrated extensive transcriptomic dysregulation compared with healthy controls with reduced CD4+naïve T-cells and resting NK cells, but higher activated dendritic cells. B-cell lymphopenia was evident in SLE but not ANA+ subjects. Two-thirds of dysregulated genes were common to ANA+ progressors and non-progressors. ANA+ progressors showed elevated modular interferon signature in which constituent genes were inducible by both type I interferon (IFN-I) and type II interferon (IFN-II) in vitro. Baseline downregulation of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation complex I components significantly associated with progression to SLE but did not directly correlate with IFN modular activity. Non-progressors demonstrated more diverse cytokine profiles. CONCLUSIONS: ANA positivity, irrespective of clinical trajectory, is profoundly dysregulated and transcriptomically closer to SLE than to healthy immune function. Metabolic derangements and IFN-I activation occur early in the ANA+ preclinical phase and associated with diverging transcriptomic profiles which distinguish subsequent clinical evolution.

Development and validation of a risk scoring system to identify patients with lupus nephritis in electronic health record data.

OBJECTIVE: Accurate identification of lupus nephritis (LN) cases is essential for patient management, research and public health initiatives. However, LN diagnosis codes in electronic health records (EHRs) are underused, hindering efficient identification. We investigated the current performance of International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes, 9th and 10th editions (ICD9/10), for identifying prevalent LN, and developed scoring systems to increase identification of LN that are adaptable to settings with and without LN ICD codes. METHODS: Training and test sets derived from EHR data from a large health system. An external set comprised data from the EHR of a second large health system. Adults with ICD9/10 codes for SLE were included. LN cases were ascertained through manual chart reviews conducted by rheumatologists. Two definitions of LN were used: strict (definite LN) and inclusive (definite, potential or diagnostic uncertainty). Gradient boosting models including structured EHR fields were used for predictor selection. Two logistic regression-based scoring systems were developed ('LN-Code' included LN ICD codes and 'LN-No Code' did not), calibrated and validated using standard performance metrics. RESULTS: A total of 4152 patients from University of California San Francisco Medical Center and 370 patients from Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center met the eligibility criteria. Mean age was 50 years, 87% were female. LN diagnosis codes demonstrated low sensitivity (43-73%) but high specificity (92-97%). LN-Code achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.93 and a sensitivity of 0.88 for identifying LN using the inclusive definition. LN-No Code reached an AUC of 0.91 and a sensitivity of 0.95 (0.97 for the strict definition). Both scoring systems had good external validity, calibration and performance across racial and ethnic groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study quantified the underutilisation of LN diagnosis codes in EHRs and introduced two adaptable scoring systems to enhance LN identification. Further validation in diverse healthcare settings is essential to ensure their broader applicability.

Remission and low disease activity are associated with lower healthcare costs: results from the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) inception cohort.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to determine the independent impact of definitions of remission/low disease activity (LDA) on direct/indirect costs (DCs, ICs) in a multicentre inception cohort. METHODS: Patients from 31 centres in 10 countries were enrolled within 15 months of diagnosis and assessed annually. Five mutually exclusive disease activity states (DAS) were defined as (1) remission off-treatment: clinical (c) SLEDAI-2K=0, without prednisone/immunosuppressants; (2) remission on-treatment: cSLEDAI-2K=0, prednisone ≤5 mg/day and/or maintenance immunosuppressants; (3) LDA-Toronto Cohort (TC): cSLEDAI-2K≤2, without prednisone/immunosuppressants; (4) modified lupus LDA state (mLLDAS): SLEDAI-2K≤4, no activity in major organs/systems, no new activity, prednisone ≤7.5 mg/day and/or maintenance immunosuppressants and (5) active: all remaining assessments.At each assessment, patients were stratified into the most stringent DAS fulfilled and the proportion of time in a DAS since cohort entry was determined. Annual DCs/ICs (2021 Canadian dollars) were based on healthcare use and lost workforce/non-workforce productivity over the preceding year.The association between the proportion of time in a DAS and annual DC/IC was examined through multivariable random-effects linear regressions. RESULTS: 1692 patients were followed a mean of 9.7 years; 49.0% of assessments were active. Remission/LDA (per 25% increase in time in a remission/LDA state vs active) were associated with lower annual DC/IC: remission off-treatment (DC -$C1372; IC -$C2507), remission on-treatment (DC -$C973; IC -$C2604,) LDA-TC (DC -$C1158) and mLLDAS (DC -$C1040). There were no cost differences between remission/LDA states. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that systemic lupus erythematosus patients who achieve remission, both off and on-therapy, and reductions in disease activity incur lower costs than those experiencing persistent disease activity.

Prevalence of major adverse cardiovascular events among Saudi patients with systemic lupus erythematosus compared with the general population: updates from the national SLE and PURE cohorts.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the prevalence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) among Saudi patients with SLE and the general population and considered factors associated with such outcomes were taken into consideration. METHODS: This is a cohort study evaluating the period prevalence of MACE from 2020 to 2023. The study used two datasets, namely the Saudi national prospective cohort for SLE patients and the Prospective Urban-Rural Epidemiology Study Saudi subcohort (PURE-Saudi) for the general population. Participants in both studies were monitored using a standardised protocol. MACE was defined as myocardial infarction (MI), stroke or angina. The analysis was adjusted for demographics, traditional cardiovascular risk factors and SLE diagnosis through logistic regression models. RESULTS: The PURE and national SLE cohorts comprised 488 and 746 patients, respectively. Patients with SLE from the SLE cohort were younger (40.7±12.5 vs 49.5±8.6 years) and predominantly female (90.6% vs 41.6%). The prevalence of traditional risk factors was greater in the PURE cohort compared with the SLE cohort. These factors included dyslipidaemia (28.9% vs 49.4%), obesity (63% vs 85%) and diabetes (7.8% vs 27.2%), but not hypertension (19.3% vs 18.8%). MACE (defined as MI or stroke or venous thromboembolism or heart failure) occurred more frequently in patients with SLE (4.3% vs 1.6%, p=0.004). Older age and lupus diagnosis were independently associated with MACE after adjusting for conventional risk factors. The odds of MACE were significantly related to age and lupus diagnosis (p=0.00 and p=0.00, respectively), but not cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors (p=0.83). CONCLUSION: Patients with SLE have a significantly higher risk of developing MACE than the general population. This risk is not well explained by traditional risk factors, which may explain the failure of CVD risk scores to stratify patients with SLE adequately. Further studies are needed to understand CVD risk's pathogenesis in SLE and mitigate it.

Interpreting hydroxychloroquine blood levels for medication non-adherence: a pharmacokinetic study.

OBJECTIVE: Characterise the relationship between hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) blood levels and the number of missed doses, accounting for dosage, dose timing and the large variability in pharmacokinetics (PK) between patients. METHODS: We externally validated a published PK model and then conducted dosing simulations. We developed a virtual population of 1000 patients for each dosage across a range of body weights and PK variability. Using the model, 10 Monte Carlo simulations for each patient were conducted to derive predicted whole blood concentrations every hour over 24 hours (240 000 HCQ levels at steady state). To determine the impact of missed doses on levels, we randomly deleted a fixed proportion of doses. RESULTS: For patients receiving HCQ 400 mg daily, simulated random blood levels <200 ng/mL were exceedingly uncommon in fully adherent patients (<0.1%). In comparison, with 80% of doses missed, approximately 60% of concentrations were <200 ng/mL. However, this cut-off was highly insensitive and would miss many instances of severe non-adherence. Average levels quickly dropped to <200 ng/mL after 2-4 days of missed doses. Additionally, mean levels decreased by 29.9% between peak and trough measurements. CONCLUSIONS: We propose an algorithm to optimally interpret HCQ blood levels and approximate the number of missed doses, incorporating the impact of dosage, dose timing and pharmacokinetic variability. No single cut-off has adequate combinations of both sensitivity and specificity, and cut-offs are dependent on the degree of targeted non-adherence. Future studies should measure trough concentrations to better identify target HCQ levels for non-adherence and efficacy.

Higher mortality risk from gynaecological neoplasms and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: an observational study from the Spanish National Registry.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of the different types of neoplasms and lineages on mortality of patients with SLE. METHODS: Retrospective and observational comparison of the neoplasm-related deaths in patients with SLE and the general Spanish population reported in the Spanish Hospital Discharge Database. To determine the impact of SLE on the risk of dying from each neoplasm lineage, a binary logistic regression considering age, female sex, tobacco and alcohol consumption, was performed. RESULTS: During 2016-2019, 139 531 in-hospital deaths from neoplasms were certified in Spain (91 in patients with SLE). Patients with SLE presented a lower mortality rate from solid organ neoplasms, (80.2% vs 91.1%, OR 0.393), linked to their lower risk of colorectal carcinoma (1.1% vs 10.8%, OR 0.110). By contrast, gynaecological neoplasms presented a higher risk (8.8% vs 3%, OR 3.039) in the deceased patients with SLE, associated with the higher frequency of vulvar neoplasms (2% vs 0.2%, OR 14.767) and cervical carcinomas (3.3% vs 0.5%, OR 3.809). Haematological neoplasm-related deaths were also more prevalent in patients with SLE (19.8% vs 8.9%, OR 2.546), mostly attributable to the higher proportion of deaths due to non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (11% vs 2.9%, OR 4.060) of B cell lineage (9.9% vs 2.5%, OR 4.133). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with SLE present a higher risk of death from vulvar neoplasms, cervical carcinomas and B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in comparison with the general Spanish population. In addition to developing strategies that might help to attenuate their occurrence and impact, such as decreasing the immunosuppressive burden, specific early detection programmes for these conditions should be investigated and considered carefully.