Consenso AITP español: Una lista de verificación AITP / Spanish primary care in pediatric trauma (AITP) consensus: An AITP checklist

Introducción: El curso de Asistencia Inicial al Trauma Pediátricose imparte en España desde 1997, existiendo en la actualidad 9 centrosformadores acreditados. La asistencia al paciente pediátrico politraumatizado se produce muchas veces en un ambiente proclive al errorpor olvido, por lo que las listas de verificación, como herramientasmnemotécnicas de amplia difusión en la industria y en medicina, serían especialmente útiles para evitarlos. Aunque existen varias listas deverificación para la asistencia al traumatismo pediátrico, ninguna se hadesarrollado en el entorno de nuestro curso. Material y métodos: Se acordaron los criterios para ser seleccionado como experto en Asistencia Inicial al Trauma Pediátrico con lacomisión científica de politrauma de la Sociedad Española de CirugíaPediátrica. Los ítems para formar la lista de verificación se obtuvierona partir de una revisión bibliográfica y de la consulta a los expertosseleccionados, empleando un método Delphi. Resultados. Se seleccionaron 10 expertos que representan los 9grupos o centros formadores en Asistencia Inicial al Trauma Pediátri-co y se elaboró una lista de verificación con 28 ítems, siguiendo susrecomendaciones de diseño. Conclusiones: Se diseñó una lista de verificación para el manejodel paciente pediátrico politraumatizado, con el consenso de todos losgrupos empleando un método Delphi, requisito fundamental para facilitarla difusión de esta lista. Sería preciso adaptar y validar dicha lista parasu uso en cada centro asistencial.(AU)

Introduction: The course in Primary Care in Pediatric Trauma(ATIP in Spanish) has been taught in Spain since 1997, and there arecurrently 9 accredited training centers. Care of polytraumatized pedi-atric patients often takes place in an environment conducive to errorsresulting from forgetfulness, which is why checklists –mnemonic toolswidely used in industry and medicine– are particularly useful to avoidsuch errors. Although several checklists exist for pediatric trauma care,none have been developed within the setting of our course. Materials and methods: The criteria for being selected as an expertin Primary Care in Pediatric Trauma were agreed upon with the scientific polytrauma committee of the Spanish Pediatric Surgery Society.The items that make up the checklist were obtained from a review ofthe literature and consultation with selected experts, using the DelphiTechnique. Results: 10 experts representing the 9 groups or training centers inPrimary Care in Pediatric Trauma were selected, and a 28-item checklistwas drawn up in accordance with their design recommendations.Conclusions: With the consensus of all the groups, a checklist forthe treatment of polytraumatized pediatric patients was drawn up usingthe Delphi Technique, an essential requirement for the disseminationof this checklist, which should be adapted and validated for use in eachhealthcare center.(AU)

Recommendations on the Use of Moisturizing Products Prepared by Spanish Dermatologists Using the Delphi Method. / Recomendaciones sobre el uso de productos hidratantes elaboradas por dermatólogos españoles mediante el método Delphi.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Moisturizing products are widely used in conditions affecting skin hydration. However, the lack of scientific evidence leads to discrepancies and great variability in the recommendations used by different health professionals. The aim of this consensus document is to generate recommendations based on the evidence and experience of dermatologists to unify and facilitate the use of moisturizing products in the routine clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 49-statement questionnaire on moisturizing products was prepared and, then, arranged in 5 blocks: 1) concept; 2) characteristics, 3) frequency and quantity, 4) product use and areas of application, and 5) special populations. Twenty-two expert dermatologists in the management of patients with eczema answered to the survey using a 2-round Delphi methodology (adding an item on the 2nd round). RESULTS: Consensus was reached on 27 statements (54%), most (n=23) via agreement. The highest level of agreement was reached in the blocks on quantity, product use and areas of application (77.8%), followed by the blocks on characteristics (73%) and frequency (62.5%). Regarding the blocks on concept and special populations, the level of consensus on the items proposed was 37.5% and 10%, respectively. Consensus on the use of emollients for xeroderma (71%) was higher vs atopic dermatitis (64%) and inflamed skin (33.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Consensus recommendations can help all prescribers and improve the available evidence regarding their use.

Lista de comprobación para la atención farmacéutica del paciente con enfermedad pulmonar intersticial (CheckEPID): un consenso basado en el método Delphi / Checklist for Pharmaceutical Care of the Patient with interstitial lung disease (CheckEPID): A Delphi-based consensus

Objetivo desarrollar una lista de comprobación para facilitar la atención farmacéutica al paciente con enfermedad pulmonar intersticial que requieren o están en tratamiento con antifibróticos. Método 5 especialistas en farmacia hospitalaria desarrollaron un listado inicial de 37 ítems divididos en 4 bloques: 1) primera visita del paciente, que incluía datos generales del paciente y datos del primer tratamiento; 2) visitas de seguimiento, valorando aspectos del seguimiento del tratamiento con nintedanib o pirfenidona; 3) telefarmacia, consistente en la evaluación de la inclusión de pacientes en un programa de este tipo, evolución de la enfermedad e identificación del contacto con el servicio de farmacia y 4) tratamiento no farmacológico e información al paciente. Para decidir su potencial inclusión en el listado de comprobación se realizaron 2 rondas del Delphi en las que los panelistas tenían que valorar de cada ítem propuesto su grado de acuerdo con su «utilidad», que fue el criterio determinante para su inclusión y su «aplicabilidad». Resultados se contactó con 48 farmacéuticos hospitalarios, 30 (63%) aceptaron por escrito participar, 28 (58%) completaron la primera ronda del Delphi y 27 (56%) completaron la segunda ronda. Después de la primera ronda el cuestionario se modificó y quedó constituido por 40 ítems. De los 40 ítems evaluados tras las 2 rondas del Delphi, hubo 2 que, basados en la utilidad, los participantes del Delphi no alcanzaron el consenso para su inclusión en el listado: el referido a «Antecedentes de intervención quirúrgica, específicamente cirugía abdominal en las últimas 4 semanas» (finalmente mantenido en el listado por su implicación en la indicación de nintedanib) y el de realizar recomendaciones sobre «Relajación». En 2 de los ítems no se alcanzó consenso sobre su aplicabilidad: «Estratificación del paciente según el modelo del paciente crónico de la SEFH» y «Recogida de resultados comunicados por el paciente». Conclusiones... (AU)

Objective To develop a checklist to facilitate pharmaceutical care for patients with interstitial lung disease who require or are undergoing treatment with antifibrotic drugs. Method Five hospital pharmacists developed an initial list of 37 items divided into 4 blocks: 1) First visit, which included general patient data and data from the first treatment; 2) Follow-up visits, assessing aspects of the follow-up of the treatment with nintedanib or pirfenidone; 3) Telepharmacy, consisting of the evaluation of the inclusion of patients in a program of this type, course of the disease, and identification of the contact with the pharmacy service; 4) Non-pharmacological treatment and patient information. To decide its potential inclusion in the checklist, two rounds of the Delphi were carried out in which the panelists had to assess the degree of agreement of each proposed item according to its “utility”, which was the determining criterion for its inclusion, and its “applicability”. Results 48 hospital pharmacists were contacted, 30 (63%) agreed in writing to participate, 28 (58%) completed the first round of the Delphi, and 27 (56%) completed the second round. After the first round of the Delphi the questionnaire was amended and comprised 40 items. Of the 40 items evaluated after the two rounds of the Delphi, there were two that, based on utility, the participants did not reach consensus for inclusion in the checklist: The one referring to “History of surgical intervention, specifically abdominal surgery in the last 4 weeks” (finally kept on the checklist due to its involvement in the indication of nintedanib) and to make recommendations on “Relaxation”. No consensus was reached on their applicability for two of the items: “Patient stratification according to the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy (SEFH) chronic patient model” and “Collection of Results Reported by the Patient”. Conclusions ... (AU)

[Translated article] Checklist for the pharmaceutical care of patients with interstitial lung disease (CheckEPID): A Delphi-based consensus.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a checklist to facilitate pharmaceutical care for patients with interstitial lung disease who require or are undergoing treatment with antifibrotic drugs. METHOD: Five hospital pharmacists developed an initial list of 37 items divided into 4 blocks: (1) First visit, which included general patient data and data from the first treatment; (2) follow-up visits, assessing aspects of the follow-up of the treatment with nintedanib or pirfenidone; (3) telepharmacy, consisting of the evaluation of the inclusion of patients in a program of this type, course of the disease, and identification of the contact with the pharmacy service; (4) non-pharmacological treatment and patient information. To decide its potential inclusion in the checklist, 2 rounds of the Delphi were carried out in which the panelists had to assess the degree of agreement of each proposed item according to its "utility", which was the determining criterion for its inclusion, and its "applicability". RESULTS: Forty-eight hospital pharmacists were contacted, 30 (63%) agreed in writing to participate, 28 (58%) completed the first round of the Delphi, and 27 (56%) completed the second round. After the first round of the Delphi, the questionnaire was amended and comprised 40 items. Of the 40 items evaluated after the 2 rounds of the Delphi, there were 2 that, based on utility, the participants did not reach consensus for inclusion in the checklist: the one referring to "History of surgical intervention, specifically abdominal surgery in the last 4 weeks" (finally kept on the checklist due to its involvement in the indication of nintedanib) and to make recommendations on "Relaxation". No consensus was reached on their applicability for 2 of the items: "Patient stratification according to the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy (SEFH) chronic patient model" and "Collection of Results Reported by the Patient". CONCLUSIONS: The management of patients with ILD and/or pulmonary fibrosis is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach where the hospital pharmacist plays a key role, especially, although not only, in monitoring drug treatment. We believe that this checklist can contribute from pharmaceutical care to improving the integrated care of patients with ILD who require or are undergoing treatment with antifibrotic drugs.

Adaptación transcultural al español chileno de la Perceived Stress Scale-10 (PSS-10) en profesores: estudio Delphi / Cross-cultural adaptation to Chilean Spanish of the Perceived Stress Scale-10 (PSS-10) in teachers: Delphi study

Introducción: objetivo de este estudio es presentar el proceso de adaptación transcultural del instrumento Percei-ved Stress Scale-10 (PSS-10) para la población de profesores que realizaron docencia de forma telemática a estu-diantes de nivel primario y secundario durante la pandemia por COVID-19 en Chile.Método: Estudio de corte transversal, polietápico. Se adaptó transculturalmente la PSS-10 al español chileno me-diante un proceso de validación de contenido por expertos usando el método Delphi. Se seleccionaron 9 jueces expertos. Los ítems del cuestionario fueron evaluados bajo tres categorías: relevancia, claridad y suficiencia. Se realizaron dos rondas de evaluación para determinar el grado de concordancia entre jueces, evidenciado mediante el cálculo de índices de validez de contenido. La fase de pilotaje del instrumento se llevó a cabo utilizando la pla-taforma QuestionPro® en una muestra de 54 docentes, seleccionados a través de un muestreo por conveniencia. Como medida de consistencia interna se calculó un Alfa de Cronbach.Resultados: el instrumento obtuvo un índice de validez de contenido por ítem entre 0,80 y 1,00, un índice de validez de contenido promedio de 0,97 y un índice de validez de contenido universal de 0,96. La consistencia interna arrojó una fiabilidad adecuada del PSS-10 (alfa de Cronbach de 0,85) adaptado transculturalmente al español chileno. Conclusiones: La validación de contenido de la PSS-10, utilizando el método Delphi, permitió consensuar las opi-niones expresadas por los expertos en estrés laboral. La escala demostró ser fiable, por tanto, podría ser aplicado para evaluar la autopercepción de estrés laboral en docentes chilenos. (AU)

Introduction: the aim of this study is to present the process of cross-cultural adaptation of the Perceived Stress Sca-le-10 (PSS-10) instrument for a population of teachers who taught primary and secondary school students remotely during the COVID-19 pandemic in Chile.Method: Cross-sectional, multistage study. The PSS-10 was cross-culturally adapted to Chilean Spanish by means of a content validation process by experts using the Delphi method. Nine expert judges were selected. The ques-tionnaire items were evaluated under three categories: relevance, clarity and sufficiency. Two rounds of evaluation were carried out to determine the degree of concordance between judges, evidenced by the calculation of content validity indexes. The trial phase of the instrument was carried out using the QuestionPro® platform in a sample of 54 teachers, selected through convenience sampling. Cronbach’s alpha was calculated as a measure of internal consistency.Results: the instrument obtained a content validity index per item between 0.80 and 1.00, an average content vali-dity index of 0.97 and a universal content validity index of 0.96. Internal consistency yielded an adequate reliability of the PSS-10 (Cronbach’s alpha of 0.85) cross-culturally adapted to Chilean Spanish. Conclusion: The content validation of the PSS-10, using the Delphi method, allowed consensus on the opinions ex-pressed by experts in occupational stress. The scale proved to be reliable; therefore, it could be applied to evaluate the self-perception of work stress in Chilean teachers. (AU)

Checklist for Pharmaceutical Care of the Patient with interstitial lung disease (CheckEPID): A Delphi-based consensus. / Lista de comprobación para la atención farmacéutica del paciente con enfermedad pulmonar intersticial (CheckEPID): un consenso basado en el método Delphi.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a checklist to facilitate pharmaceutical care for patients with interstitial lung disease who require or are undergoing treatment with antifibrotic drugs. METHOD: Five hospital pharmacists developed an initial list of 37 items divided into 4 blocks: 1) First visit, which included general patient data and data from the first treatment; 2) Follow-up visits, assessing aspects of the follow-up of the treatment with nintedanib or pirfenidone; 3) Telepharmacy, consisting of the evaluation of the inclusion of patients in a program of this type, course of the disease, and identification of the contact with the pharmacy service; 4) Non-pharmacological treatment and patient information. To decide its potential inclusion in the checklist, two rounds of the Delphi were carried out in which the panelists had to assess the degree of agreement of each proposed item according to its "utility", which was the determining criterion for its inclusion, and its "applicability". RESULTS: 48 hospital pharmacists were contacted, 30 (63%) agreed in writing to participate, 28 (58%) completed the first round of the Delphi, and 27 (56%) completed the second round. After the first round of the Delphi the questionnaire was amended and comprised 40 items. Of the 40 items evaluated after the two rounds of the Delphi, there were two that, based on utility, the participants did not reach consensus for inclusion in the checklist: The one referring to "History of surgical intervention, specifically abdominal surgery in the last 4 weeks" (finally kept on the checklist due to its involvement in the indication of nintedanib) and to make recommendations on "Relaxation". No consensus was reached on their applicability for two of the items: "Patient stratification according to the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy (SEFH) chronic patient model" and "Collection of Results Reported by the Patient". CONCLUSIONS: The management of patients with ILD and/or pulmonary fibrosis is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach where the hospital pharmacist plays a key role, especially, although not only, in monitoring drug treatment. We believe that this checklist can contribute from pharmaceutical care to improving the integrated care of patients with ILD who require or are undergoing treatment with antifibrotic drugs.

Estrategias para mejorar el flujo de ingresos y estancias hospitalarias: adaptación del cuestionario Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP): estudio Delphi / Strategies to improve the flow of admissions and hospital stays: A Delphi study of an adaptation of the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol

Introducción y objetivo La herramienta Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP) analiza las estancias e ingresos hospitalarios inadecuados. El objetivo de este estudio fue adaptar el cuestionario AEP para analizar la adecuación de los ingresos y las estancias hospitalarias en nuestra realidad asistencial. Método Se desarrolló un estudio utilizando el método Delphi en el que participaron 15 expertos en gestión clínica y en asistencia hospitalaria. Los ítems del formulario inicial se conformaron a partir de la herramienta AEP tal y como fue definida en su primera versión. En la primera ronda los participantes aportaron nuevos ítems que consideraron relevantes en nuestra realidad actual. En las rondas 2 y 3 evaluaron 80 ítems según su relevancia mediante la utilización de una escala Likert del 1 al 4 (máxima utilidad). De acuerdo al diseño de nuestro estudio los ítems del AEP se consideraron adecuados si la media de la puntuación una vez evaluados por los expertos, era igual o superior a 3. Resultados Los participantes definieron un total de 19 nuevos ítems. Finalmente 47 ítems obtuvieron una puntuación media igual o superior a 3. El cuestionario resultante modificado consta de 17 ítems en «causas de admisiones adecuadas», 5 en «causas de admisiones inadecuadas», 15 en «causas de estancias adecuadas» y 10 en «causas de estancias inadecuadas». Conclusiones La identificación de ítems prioritarios para determinar la adecuación de los ingresos y las estancias prolongadas en nuestro medio y según la opinión de los expertos, podría definir un futuro instrumento para su utilización en nuestro entorno (AU)

Introduction and aim The Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP) tool analyzes inappropriate hospital stays and admissions. This study aimed to adapt the AEP questionnaire in order to analyze the appropriateness of hospital admissions and stays in our healthcare reality. Methods A study was conducted using the Delphi method in which 15 experts in clinical management and hospital care participated. The initial questionnaire items were taken from the first version of the AEP. In the first round, the participants contributed new items that they considered relevant in our current reality. In rounds 2 and 3, they evaluated 80 items according to their relevance using a Likert scale from 1 to 4 (maximum usefulness). Pursuant to the study's design, AEP items were considered adequate if the mean score according to the experts’ evaluation was greater than or equal to 3. Results The participants defined a total of 19 new items. In the end, 47 items earned a mean score greater than or equal to 3. The resulting modified questionnaire include 17 items in “Reasons for Appropriate Admissions”, 5 in “Reasons for Inappropriate Admissions”, 15 in “Reasons for Appropriate Hospital Stays”, and 10 in “Reasons for Inappropriate Hospital Stays”. Conclusions The identification according to expert opinion of priority items to determine the appropriateness of admissions and extended stays could be used in the future to help create an instrument to be used in our setting (AU)

Strategies to improve the flow of admissions and hospital stays: a Delphi study of an adaptation of the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP).

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: The Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP) tool analyzes inappropriate hospital stays and admissions. This study aimed to adapt the AEP questionnaire in order to analyse the appropriateness of hospital admissions and stays in our healthcare reality. METHODS: A study was conducted using the Delphi method in which 15 experts in clinical management and hospital care participated. The initial questionnaire items were taken from the first version of the AEP. In the first round, the participants contributed new items that they considered relevant in our current reality. In rounds 2 and 3, they evaluated 80 items according to their relevance using a Likert scale from 1 to 4 (maximum usefulness). Pursuant to the study's design, AEP items were considered adequate if the mean score according to the experts' evaluation was greater than or equal to 3. RESULTS: The participants defined a total of 19 new items. In the end, 47 items earned a mean score greater than or equal to 3. The resulting modified questionnaire include 17 items in "Reasons for Appropriate Admissions," 5 in "Reasons for Inappropriate Admissions," 15 in "Reasons for Appropriate Hospital Stays," and 10 in "Reasons for Inappropriate Hospital Stays." CONCLUSIONS: The identification according to expert opinion of priority items to determine the appropriateness of admissions and extended stays could be used in the future to help create an instrument to be used in our setting.

Recomendaciones de expertos acerca del uso de teduglutide en pacientes pediátricos con sindrome de intestino corto / Expert recommendations on the use of teduglutide in pediatric patients with short bowel syndrome

Resumen El síndrome de intestino corto es una entidad de baja incidencia en los pacientes pediátricos, pero se asocia con elevadas tasas de morbimortalidad. El abordaje de estos pacientes por un equipo interdisciplinario de expertos enfocados en la rehabilitación intestinal mejora los resultados a corto y a largo plazo. Entre los recursos disponibles para el tratamiento se incluye el teduglutide, un análogo del péptido similar al glucagón tipo 2 (GLP-2) elaborado mediante técnicas recombinantes. Por medio de la aplicación del método Delphi, a partir de la evidencia disponible y de la experiencia de los autores, se proponen recomendaciones para el uso de teduglutide, dirigidas a los profesionales de la salud que tratan a los pacientes pediátricos con síndrome de intestino corto, así como a las autoridades sanitarias.

Abstract Short bowel syndrome is a low-incidence disorder among pediatric patients, but it is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Management of these patients by an interdisciplinary team of experts focused on intestinal rehabilitation improves short- and long-term outcomes. Available resources for treatment include teduglutide, a glucagon-like peptide type 2 (GLP-2) analog made by recombinant techniques. Considering the available evi dence and the authors' experience, Delphi-based recommendations for the use of teduglutide are suggested for healthcare professionals who treat pediatric patients with short bowel syndrome, as well as for health authorities.

Recomendaciones de expertos para el uso de apremilast en artritis psoriásica / Expert recommendations for the use of apremilast in psoriatic arthritis

Introducción y objetivos: A pesar de la evidencia, existen dudas sobre el posicionamiento de apremilast en el algoritmo de tratamiento de la artritis psoriásica (APs). El objetivo del presente proyecto fue recoger la evidencia científica y la experiencia de un grupo de reumatólogos expertos en el manejo de la APs sobre el uso de apremilast en la práctica clínica en España. Material y métodos: Un comité científico formado por 6 expertos propuso 5 escenarios clínicos donde la evidencia sobre el uso de apremilast en APs era controvertida: 1) eficacia en APs periférica; 2) eficacia en entesitis y dactilitis; 3) eficacia en APs con afectación cutánea; 4) comorbilidades, y 5) seguridad de apremilast. Tras esto, un panel de 17 reumatólogos expertos en el tratamiento de la APs discutió estos escenarios y generó un cuestionario con 50 preguntas y 156 ítems según metodología Delphi, el cual fue respondido de forma anónima por los panelistas. Resultados: Tras 2 rondas de votación, el panel de expertos alcanzó el consenso en 93 de los 156 ítems planteados (59,6%) (67 apropiados y 26 inapropiados). El grado de consenso fue del 53,3% en el área de «Eficacia en APs periférica»; del 60,0% en «Eficacia en entesitis y dactilitis»; del 50,0% en «Eficacia en APs con afectación cutánea»; del 57,1% en «Manejo de las comorbilidades en pacientes con APs», y del 67,3% en «Implicaciones de la seguridad en el uso de apremilast». Conclusiones: La opinión estructurada de los expertos complementa la evidencia disponible y contribuye al establecimiento de pautas consensuadas para el uso de apremilast en APs.(AU)

Introduction and objectives: Despite the evidence, there are doubts about the positioning of apremilast in the psoriatic arthritis (PsA) treatment algorithm. The objective of this project was to collect the scientific evidence and the experience of a group of rheumatologists who are experts in the management of PsA with apremilast in clinical practice in Spain. Material and methods: A scientific committee made up of 6 experts proposed 5 clinical scenarios where the evidence on the use of apremilast in PsA was controversial: 1) efficacy in peripheral PsA; 2) efficacy in enthesitis and dactylitis; 3) efficacy in PsA with skin involvement; 4) comorbidities, and 5) apremilast safety. After this, a panel of 17 rheumatologists with expertise in PsA management discussed these scenarios and generated a questionnaire with 50 questions and 156 items following the Delphi methodology. This questionnaire was anonymously answered by the panel. Results: After 2 voting rounds, the panel of experts reached consensus in 93 of the 156 items raised (59.6%) (67 appropiate and 26 inappropiate). The degree of consensus was 53.3% in the area of “Efficacy in peripheral PsA”; 60.0% in “Efficacy in enthesitis and dactylitis”; 50.0% in “Efficacy in PsA with skin involvement”; 57.1% in “Management of comorbidities in patients with PsA”, and 67.3% in “Implications of safety in the use of apremilast”. Conclusions: The structured opinion of the experts complements the available evidence and contributes to the establishment of consensual guidelines for the use of apremilast in PsA.(AU)

Expert recommendations for the use of apremilast in psoriatic arthritis.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Despite the evidence, there are doubts about the positioning of apremilast in the psoriatic arthritis (PsA) treatment algorithm. The objective of this project was to collect the scientific evidence and the experience of a group of rheumatologists who are experts in the management of PsA with apremilast in clinical practice in Spain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A scientific committee made up of 6 experts proposed 5 clinical scenarios where the evidence on the use of apremilast in PsA was controversial: (i) Efficacy in peripheral PsA; (ii) Efficacy in enthesitis and dactylitis; (iii) Efficacy in PsA with skin involvement; (iv) Comorbidities; and (v) Apremilast safety. After this, a panel of 17 rheumatologists with expertise in PsA management discussed these scenarios and generated a questionnaire with 50 questions and 156 items following the Delphi methodology. This questionnaire was anonymously answered by the panel. RESULTS: After 2 voting rounds, the panel of experts reached consensus in 93 of the 156 items raised (59.6%) (67 in agreement and 26 in disagreement). The degree of consensus was 53.3% in the area of "Efficacy in peripheral PsA"; 60.0% in "Efficacy in enthesitis and dactylitis"; 50.0% in "Efficacy in PsA with skin involvement"; 57.1% in "Management of comorbidities in patients with PsA"; and 67.3% in "Implications of safety in the use of apremilast". CONCLUSIONS: The structured opinion of the experts complements the available evidence and contributes to the establishment of consensual guidelines for the use of apremilast in PsA.

Valoración de una metodología para integrar software educativo en la asignatura Rehabilitación estomatológica / Assessment of a methodology to integrate educational software in Stomatological Rehabilitation Subject

Introducción: Al elaborar una metodología resulta importante obtener los criterios de expertos antes de su aplicación. En un periodo precedente a esta investigación se elaboró una metodología con etapas y procedimientos para el desarrollo de software educativo. Objetivo: Valorar la pertinencia de la metodología para la integración de software educativo en el proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje de las asignaturas Rehabilitación I y II de Estomatología. Método: Se realizó una investigación pedagógica en la Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de Holguín. Para valorar la pertinencia de la metodología se aplicó el método Delphi, a partir del cual, mediante una encuesta aplicada a 17 expertos seleccionados por su alto coeficiente de competencia en la temática, se pudo llegar a un consenso sobre el tema explorado. Resultados: La aplicación del cuestionario reveló que la mayoría de los expertos consideró cada indicador de la dimensión validez como muy adecuado, solo uno evaluó el indicador etapas de la metodología como adecuado y los procedimientos de la etapa dos como bastante adecuados. Para la dimensión viabilidad casi la totalidad consideró muy adecuados los indicadores factibilidad de aplicación y posibilidad de generalización; esta última fue evaluada por un experto como adecuada. Al comparar los resultados de los siete indicadores con los puntos de corte se aprecia que los expertos en su conjunto los definen como muy adecuados. Conclusiones: La pertinencia de la metodología se constató con el criterio consensuado de los expertos, quienes consideraron muy adecuados los aspectos valorados, y realizaron aportes que permitieron perfeccionarla antes de su implementación. Sobre estas bases no fue necesaria una segunda etapa de aplicación del método(AU)

Introduction: When developing a methodology, it is important to obtain the criteria of experts before its application. In a period preceding this research, a methodology with stages and procedures was defined for the development of educational software. Objective: To assess the relevance of the methodology for the integration of educational software in the teaching-learning process of the subjects Rehabilitation I and II of Stomatology. Method: A pedagogical research was carried out at the University Of Medical Sciences Of Holguín. To assess the relevance of the methodology, the Delphi method was applied, from which, through a survey applied to 17 experts selected for their high coefficient of competence in the subject, a consensus could be reached on the explored topic. Results: The application of the questionnaire revealed that most of the experts considered each indicator of the validity dimension as very adequate; only one evaluated the indicator stages of the methodology as adequate and the procedures of stage two as quite adequate. For the feasibility dimension, almost all considered the feasibility of application and possibility of generalization indicators to be very adequate; the latter was evaluated by an expert as adequate. When comparing the results of the seven indicators with the cut-off points, it can be seen that the experts as a whole define them as very adequate. Conclusions: The relevance of the methodology was verified with the agreed criteria of the experts, who considered the aspects evaluated to be very adequate, and made contributions that allowed it to be perfected before its implementation. On these bases, a second stage of application of the method was not necessary(AU)

Description of basic competencies in clinical ultrasound imaging for emergency departments. / Competencias básicas de la ecografía clínica en los servicios de urgencias y emergencias.

TEXT: Recent years have seen great advances in the use of clinical ultrasound imaging in both hospital emergency departments and out-of-hospital settings. However, all new techniques require up-to-date definitions of competencies relevant to the clinical realities of different specialties and the geographic settings in which specialists work. To that end, a group of experts in clinical ultrasound reviewed the evidence available in the literature and strictly applied the Delphi method to define the competencies relevant to emergency physicians. The group worked with the starting premise that clinical ultrasound imaging should be a common competency across the specialty.

TEXTO: En los últimos años, la ecografía clínica (EC) ha sufrido un avance muy importante en su implantación dentro de los servicios de urgencias, tanto hospitalarios como extrahospitalarios, pero como toda técnica requiere un ámbito competencial definido, actualizado y enmarcado, tanto en la realidad clínica de la especialidad que desempeñamos como en la geográfica del país donde ejercemos. Por ello, un grupo de expertos en la materia ha desarrollado el presente documento en el que basándose por un lado en la evidencia disponible en la bibliografía científica y por otro en una metodología Delphi, planteó el objetivo de establecer un claro marco competencial base para todos los urgenciólogos, asumiendo como premisa inicial que la EC debería ser una competencia transversal común.

Proyecto INCLIASMA fase II - Inercia clínica en asma en España / INCLIASMA phase II project – Clinical inertia in asthma in Spain

Objetivos El 80% de los pacientes con asma están mal controlados. A pesar de disponer de guías de práctica clínica (GPC) actualizadas, se sigue detectando un deficiente control y tratamiento del asma. El objetivo principal del estudio INCLIASMA faseII (INercia CLInica en ASMA) es analizar la realidad en el manejo del asma en las consultas de atención primaria (AP) españolas. Como objetivo secundario se planteó establecer una serie de recomendaciones clave en el manejo del paciente con asma, basadas en las conclusiones de los panelistas. Material y métodos Estudio transversal descriptivo, multicéntrico y no aleatorizado, que se desarrolló en dos rondas, siguiendo la metodología Delphi. Se elaboró un cuestionario on line específico para el proyecto de 41 ítems y divido en 5 bloques (diagnóstico, control, adherencia, tratamiento y criterios de derivación) y se pidió a un grupo de médicos de AP expertos en asma que expresaran su nivel de acuerdo o desacuerdo con el conjunto de ítems del cuestionario. De los resultados se identificaron las principales controversias existentes en el manejo de asma en España y se elaboraron recomendaciones prácticas. Resultados Participaron 24 panelistas. Hubo un consenso final en el 92,68% (38/41) de la totalidad de los ítems recogidos en el cuestionario. Los panelistas concluyeron que se tarda en exceso en diagnosticar el asma, existiendo un porcentaje elevado de pacientes asmáticos sin un correcto tratamiento, y, por ende, sin un adecuado control. La falta de tiempo, la sobrecarga asistencial o la inercia terapéutica son algunos de los factores determinantes de esta situación. Conclusione El estudio INCLIASMA faseII pone de relieve las controversias encontradas en la práctica clínica habitual en el manejo del asma, poniendo de manifiesto la necesidad continuada de formación y ofreciendo recomendaciones consensuadas que buscan mejorar el manejo de asma en nuestro país (AU)

Objectives Eighty percent of patients with asthma are poorly controlled. Despite the availability of updated clinical practice guidelines, poor asthma control and treatment continue to be detected. The main objective of the INCLIASMA phaseII study (INercia CLInica en ASMA) is to analyze the reality of asthma management in Spanish primary care (PC) clinics. As a secondary objective, it was proposed to establish a series of key recommendations in the management of patients with asthma, based on the conclusions of the panelists. Material and methods Cross-sectional descriptive, multicenter and non-randomized study, which was developed in two rounds, following the Delphi methodology. A specific online questionnaire was developed for the project with 41 items and divided into 5 blocks (diagnosis, control, adherence, treatment and referral criteria) and a group of PC physicians who were experts in asthma were asked to express their level of agreement or disagreement with the set of items in the questionnaire. From the results, the main existing controversies in the management of asthma in Spain were identified and practical recommendations were elaborated. Results Twenty-four panelists participated. There was a final consensus in 92.68% (38/41) of all the items collected in the questionnaire. The panelists concluded that it takes too long to diagnose asthma, and there is a high percentage of asthmatic patients without proper treatment, and therefore, without adequate control. Lack of time, care overload or therapeutic inertia are some of the determining factors in this situation. Conclusions The INCLIASMA phaseII study highlights the controversies found in routine clinical practice in asthma management, highlighting the continued need for training and offering consensus recommendations that seek to improve asthma management in our country (AU)

Competencias básicas de la ecografía clínica en los servicios de urgencias y emergencias / Description of basic competencies in clinical ultrasound imaging for emergency departments

En los últimos años, la ecografía clínica (EC) ha sufrido un avance muy importante en su implantación dentro de los servicios de urgencias, tanto hospitalarios como extrahospitalarios, pero como toda técnica requiere un ámbito competencial definido, actualizado y enmarcado, tanto en la realidad clínica de la especialidad que desempeñamos como en la geográfica del país donde ejercemos. Por ello, un grupo de expertos en la materia ha desarrollado el presente documento en el que basándose por un lado en la evidencia disponible en la bibliografía científica y por otro en una metodología Delphi, planteó el objetivo de establecer un claro marco competencial base para todos los urgenciólogos, asumiendo como premisa inicial que la EC debería ser una competencia transversal común. (AU)

Recent years have seen great advances in the use of clinical ultrasound imaging in both hospital emergency departments and out-of-hospital settings. However, all new techniques require up-to-date definitions of competencies relevant to the clinical realities of different specialties and the geographic settings in which specialists work. To that end, a group of experts in clinical ultrasound reviewed the evidence available in the literature and strictly applied the Delphi method to define the competencies relevant to emergency physicians. The group worked with the starting premise that clinical ultrasound imaging should be a common competency across the special (AU)

[INCLIASMA phase II project - Clinical inertia in asthma in Spain]. / Proyecto INCLIASMA fase II - Inercia clínica en asma en España.

OBJECTIVES: Eighty percent of patients with asthma are poorly controlled. Despite the availability of updated clinical practice guidelines, poor asthma control and treatment continue to be detected. The main objective of the INCLIASMA phaseII study (INercia CLInica en ASMA) is to analyze the reality of asthma management in Spanish primary care (PC) clinics. As a secondary objective, it was proposed to establish a series of key recommendations in the management of patients with asthma, based on the conclusions of the panelists. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional descriptive, multicenter and non-randomized study, which was developed in two rounds, following the Delphi methodology. A specific online questionnaire was developed for the project with 41 items and divided into 5 blocks (diagnosis, control, adherence, treatment and referral criteria) and a group of PC physicians who were experts in asthma were asked to express their level of agreement or disagreement with the set of items in the questionnaire. From the results, the main existing controversies in the management of asthma in Spain were identified and practical recommendations were elaborated. RESULTS: Twenty-four panelists participated. There was a final consensus in 92.68% (38/41) of all the items collected in the questionnaire. The panelists concluded that it takes too long to diagnose asthma, and there is a high percentage of asthmatic patients without proper treatment, and therefore, without adequate control. Lack of time, care overload or therapeutic inertia are some of the determining factors in this situation. CONCLUSIONS: The INCLIASMA phaseII study highlights the controversies found in routine clinical practice in asthma management, highlighting the continued need for training and offering consensus recommendations that seek to improve asthma management in our country.

Utilidad de los colgajos e injertos endonasales en cirugía endoscópica nasosinusal y de base de cráneo. Documento de consenso / Usefulness of endonasal flaps and grafts in skull base surgery. Consensus document

Introducción: La reconstrucción de base de cráneo constituye uno de los mayores retos de la cirugía endoscópica endonasal expandida. Existen multitud de injertos y colgajos de origen endonasal que han demostrado su utilidad en el control de complicaciones como las fístulas de LCR, entre otras. Se hace necesaria la revisión y el análisis de los recursos endonasales y su uso en cirugía endoscópica endonasal expandida.ObjetivosDocumento de consenso sobre el uso de los distintos injertos y colgajos de origen endonasal y su uso en cirugía endoscópica endonasal expandida.Material y métodosRevisión bibliográfica sobre los injertos libres y colgajos vascularizados de origen endonasal más relevantes. Análisis mediante el método Delphi, sobre el uso de los distintos recursos endonasales para la reparación endoscópica de defectos de base de cráneo.ResultadosSe obtuvieron dos resultados. 1) Una selección de los colgajos e injertos de origen endonasal más representativos, describiendo origen, superficie e indicaciones, a partir de una revisión bibliográfica. 2) Un documento de consenso, utilizando la metodología Delphi, con las consideraciones generales (2), recomendaciones (10) y limitaciones (6) sobre el uso de los distintos colgajos e injertos de origen endonasal.ConclusionesPresentamos el primer documento de consenso en el campo de la cirugía endoscópica endonasal utilizando el método Delphi como herramienta de trabajo. Se destaca la utilidad del colgajo nasoseptal junto con el resto de colgajos e injertos de origen endonasal para la cirugía reconstructiva de base de cráneo. (AU)

Introduction: Skull base reconstruction is one of the greatest challenges extended endonasal endoscopic surgery. Many grafts and flaps from the endonasal fossa have been demonstrated to be useful in the control of complications such a cerebrospinal fluid leaks. Review and analysis of these resources are necessary in skull base recontruction to improve outcomes.ObjectivesThe target is to create a consensus document on the use of different endonasal flaps and grafts in the skull base surgery.Material and methodsLiterature review of the most relevant free grafts and vascularized flaps from the endonasal fossa. Analysis using the Delphi method on the use of the different endonasal resources for endoscopic repair of skull base defects.ResultsWe obtained two results: 1) A selection of the most representative flaps and grafts from the endonasal fossa, describing origin, surface and indications, based on a literature review. 2) A consensus document, using Delphi methodology, with general considerations (2), recommendations (10) and limitations (6) of the different endonasal flaps and grafts.ConclusionsWe present the first consensus document in the field of extended endonasal endoscopic surgery using the Delphi method as a working tool. We highlight the usefulness of the nasoseptal flap together with other endonasal flaps and grafts for skull base reconstruction. (AU)

Usefulness of endonasal flaps and grafts in skull base surgery. Consensus document.

INTRODUCTION: Skull base reconstruction is one of the greatest challenges extended endonasal endoscopic surgery. Many grafts and flaps from the endonasal fossa have been demonstrated to be useful in the control of complications such a cerebrospinal fluid leaks. Review and analysis of these resources are necessary in skull base recontruction to improve outcomes. OBJECTIVES: The target is to create a consensus document on the use of different endonasal flaps and grafts in the skull base surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Literature review of the most relevant free grafts and vascularized flaps from the endonasal fossa. Analysis using the Delphi method on the use of the different endonasal resources for endoscopic repair of skull base defects. RESULTS: We obtained two results: 1) A selection of the most representative flaps and grafts from the endonasal fossa, describing origin, surface and indications, based on a literature review. 2) A consensus document, using Delphi methodology, with general considerations (2), recommendations (10) and limitations (6) of the different endonasal flaps and grafts. CONCLUSIONS: We present the first consensus document in the field of extended endonasal endoscopic surgery using the Delphi method as a working tool. We highlight the usefulness of the nasoseptal flap together with other endonasal flaps and grafts for skull base reconstruction.

Proyecto INCLIASMA - inercia clínica en asma / INCLIASMA project – Clinical inertia in asthma

Objetivos: El asma es una enfermedad de alta prevalencia que limita la calidad de vida de los pacientes y tiene elevados costes sanitarios. A pesar de disponer de guías de práctica clínica, se sigue detectando un deficiente control del asma. El objetivo de este proyecto es estudiar el manejo del asma desde las consultas de atención primaria de Aragón, España. Material y métodos: Estudio cualitativo, multicéntrico y no aleatorizado, que se desarrolló en dos rondas, siguiendo la metodología Delphi. Se pidió a un grupo de médicos de Atención Primaria con amplia experiencia en el manejo del asma que expresaran su nivel de acuerdo con el conjunto de ítems del cuestionario propuesto por el comité científico del proyecto. El cuestionario de 28 ítems se estructuró en cuatro bloques: diagnóstico, control, adherencia y tratamiento. Resultados: El cuestionario fue respondido por 15 panelistas. Hubo consenso en el 82,14% (23/28) de los ítems. Se encontraron dificultades para diagnosticar el asma de forma precoz y certera. Existe una confusión entre control y gravedad. La percepción de adherencia es muy variable. Hay un sobreuso de broncodilatadores de acción corta. Se evidencia mucha inercia terapéutica. Conclusiones: El estudio Inercia Clínica en Asma (INCLIASMA) pone de relieve las controversias encontradas entre lo que aconsejan las guías de práctica clínica y la evidencia real y ofrece recomendaciones para subsanar las diferencias encontradas (AU)

Objectives: Asthma is a highly prevalent disease limiting the quality of life of patients and has high health costs. Despite having clinical practice guidelines, poor asthma control continues to be detected. The objective of this project is to study asthma management from primary care consultations in Aragón, Spain. Material and methods: Qualitative, multicenter and non-randomized study, developed in two-round, following Delphi methodology. A group of a group of Primary Care physicians with extensive experience in asthma management were asked to express their level of agreement with the set of items of the questionnaire proposed by the scientific committee of the project. The 28-item survey was structured in 4 blocks: diagnosis, control, adherence and treatment. Results: The survey was answered by 15 experts. Consensus was reached in 82.14% (23/28) of the items. Difficulties were found in diagnosing asthma early and accurately. There is a confusion between control and severity. The perception of adherence is highly variable. There is an overuse of short-acting bronchodilators. Much therapeutic inertia is evidenced. Conclusions: The INCLIASMA study highlights the existing controversies between what is advised in the guidelines of clinical practice and the real evidence and provides recommendations to correct the differences found (AU)

Validación de un manual sobre la elaboración de una estrategia didáctica para potenciar el nivel de información sobre la COVID-19 en estudiantes de Medicina / Validation of a manual to design a didactic strategy for enhancing the level of information on COVID-19 in the medical students / Validação de um manual sobre o desenvolvimento de uma estratégia didática para aumentar o nível de informação sobre COVID-19 em estudantes de Medicina

RESUMEN Introducción: Las estrategias didácticas, en su conjunto, demandan establecer una relación dialógica, constante y triangular entre educadores, educandos y metodologías, aunque el educando ignore o no las metodologías que utiliza el docente para tal fin. Objetivo: validar un manual para el diseño y elaboración de una estrategia didáctica para potenciar el nivel de información sobre COVID-19 en estudiantes de Medicina. Método: Se elaboró un manual sobre el diseño de una estrategia didáctica empleada para incrementar el conocimiento de los estudiantes de Medicina del segundo año de la Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de Sancti Spíritus, Cuba, sobre los signos, síntomas y métodos de prevención de la COVID-19 durante el inicio de la pandemia en el país. Treinta expertos nacionales en ciencias de la educación médica emitieron sus dictámenes sobre la pertinencia de la estrategia didáctica y del manual sobre su diseño, y fueron analizados por el método Delphi. El éxito de la aplicación de la estrategia didáctica se valoró mediante la aplicación de exámenes a la población del estudio antes y después de la introducción de la estrategia didáctica en el período 2021-2022. Resultados: El consenso general de los expertos fue de Muy de acuerdo para los fundamentos que sustentan la estrategia didáctica para la educación médica superior y la calidad del manual propuesto. Conclusiones: Tanto la estrategia educativa como el manual sobre su elaboración fueron validadas por los expertos para su aplicación en la educación médica superior y, particularmente, para la detección y contención de la COVID-19.

ABSTRACT Introduction: Didactic strategies, as a whole, demand the establishment of a dialogical, constant and triangular relationship between educators, learners and methodologies, even though the learner is unaware or not of the methodologies used by the professor for purpose required. Objective: To validate a manual for designing and elaborating a didactic strategy to enhance the information level for medical students concerning COVID-19. Method: A manual based on a didactic strategy structural design was elaborated with the porpuse of increase the knowledge for the second year medical students at the Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de Sancti Spíritus, Cuba, on the signs, symptoms of COVID-19 and the prevention methods used at the beginning of the pandemic in the country. Thirty national experts in medical education sciences gave their opinions on the relevance of the didactic strategy and about the structural design of the manual, which were analyzed by the Delphi method. The success of the strategy implementation was assessed implementing tests to the studied population before and after the introduction of the didactic strategy in the period 2021- 2022. Results: The experts' opinion concerning the fundamentals underpinning the didactic strategy for higher medical education and the quality of the proposed manual was highly favorable in general consensus. Conclusions: Both the educational strategy and the elaboration of the manual were validated by the experts for its application in higher medical education and in particularly for the detection and containment of COVID-19.

RESUMO Introdução: As estratégias didáticas, como um todo, demandam estabelecer uma relação dialógica, constante e triangular entre educadores, educandos e metodologias, independentemente de o educando ignorar ou não as metodologias utilizadas pelo professor para esse fim. Objetivo: Submeter um manual para a concepção e desenvolvimento de uma estratégia didática para melhorar o nível de informação sobre COVID-19 em estudantes de medicina para validação. Método: Foi elaborado um manual sobre o desenho de uma estratégia didática utilizada para aumentar o conhecimento dos alunos do segundo ano de Medicina da Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de Sancti Spíritus, Cuba, sobre os sinais, sintomas e métodos de prevenção da COVID. -19 durante o início da pandemia no país. Trinta especialistas nacionais em ciências da educação médica emitiram suas opiniões sobre a relevância da estratégia didática e do manual sobre seu desenho, e foram analisados pelo método Delphi. O sucesso da aplicação da estratégia didática foi avaliado por meio da aplicação de testes à população do estudo antes e após a introdução da estratégia didática no período 2021-2022. Resultados: O consenso geral dos especialistas foi Fortemente concordante para os fundamentos que sustentam a estratégia didática para a formação médica superior e a qualidade do manual proposto. Conclusões: Tanto a estratégia educativa como o manual sobre a sua elaboração foram validados por especialistas para a sua aplicação no ensino superior médico e, em particular, para a deteção e contenção da COVID-19.