A Comparison of Miller Straight Blade and Macintosh Blade Laryngoscopes for Intubation in Morbidly Obese Patients.

The primary objective of this study was to demonstrate whether the Miller blade laryngoscope could provide better visualization of the vocal cords in morbidly obese patients than the Macintosh blade laryngoscope. The secondary objective was to identify the patient-measured factors associated with better visualization of the vocal cords when using the Miller vs. Macintosh blade, as well as whether the application of external pressure might improve the visibility of the glottis during intubation. A prospective, observational study encompassing 110 patients with a BMI > 40 undergoing elective bariatric surgery and intubation procedure was performed. The evaluation of the vocal cords was performed according to the Cormack-Lehane scale and POGO scale in the same patient during intubation, performed with a Miller and a Macintosh blade laryngoscope, in a random matter. The following parameters were assessed: body weight, height, BMI, neck circumference, thyromental distance, sternomental distance, mouth opening, and Mallampati scale and their impact on visualization of the vocal cords using the Miller blade without the application of external pressure. The Miller blade provides an improved view of the glottis compared to the Macintosh blade measured with both the Cormac-Lehane scale (45 (40.91%) without external pressure application on the larynx, and 18 (16.36%) with external pressure application on the larynx) and the POGO scale (45 (40.91%) without external pressure application on the larynx, and 19 (17.27%) with external pressure application on the larynx). The application of laryngeal pressure improved the view of the glottis. Among the measured features, a significant improvement in the visibility of the glottis could be found in patients with a BMI over 44.244 kg/m2 and a neck circumference over 46 cm. To conclude, the usage of the Miller blade improves the visibility of the glottis compared to the Macintosh blade in morbidly obese patients. The recommendation to use the Miller blade in this group of patients requires further investigation, taking into account the effectiveness of the intubation. Trial Registration: NCT05494463.

Comparison of the Efficacy of Macintosh Laryngoscope Versus Airtraq Videolaryngoscope for Visualization of Laryngeal Structures at the End of Thyroidectomy: A Randomized Control Study.

To compare the efficacy of conventional Macintosh laryngoscope with Airtraq videolaryngoscope for visualization of laryngeal structures to rule out recurrent laryngeal nerve injury at the end of thyroidectomy. This randomized double-blind control study was conducted following IEC-Human approval, prospective CTRI registration and written informed consent from participants. Patients of either sex, aged 18-65 years, ASA grade I/II, scheduled for thyroidectomy under GA were included. Group DL underwent direct laryngoscopy using Macintosh blade whereas group VL underwent laryngoscopy using Airtraq® videolaryngoscope. CL(Cormack-Lehane) grade of laryngeal view, time taken to achieve optimal view, haemodynamic parameters, Patient reactivity score(PRS) and complications were noted. Unpaired t-test, chi-square test were used. A total of 73 patients were included for study with 38 in group DL and 35 in group VL. The grade of laryngeal view was found to be significantly better with Airtraq® VL compared to Macintosh laryngoscope without the application of BURP (p < 0.05). In the DL group, 34.2% (n = 13) had a CL grade I, 36.8% (n = 14) had CL grade 2A, 13.2% had CL grade 2B (n = 5) and 15.8% (n = 6) had CL Grade 3 at the end of thyroidectomy. On the contrary, in the VL Group, 71.5% (n = 25) of the participants had a CL Grade I; whereas, 20% (n = 7) had a CL Grade 2A, 5.7% (n = 2) had CL grade 2B and 2.8% (n = 1) of participants had CL grade 3. The mean "time taken to achieve optimal view' was comparable between the two groups (DL = 39.16 ± 105.53 s vs. VL = 38.89 ± 20.69 s) (p = 0.988).The haemodynamic parameters, Patient reactivity score and complications were comparable between the two groups. The performance of Airtraq® videolaryngoscope, a channelled VL is better than conventional Macintosh laryngoscope in terms of the optimal glottic view obtained to rule out recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy at the end of thyroidectomy.

Comparison of McGrath Videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh Laryngoscope in Tracheal Intubation: An Updated Systematic Review.

(1) Background: In the last few years, many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared direct Macintosh laryngoscopy with McGrath videolaryngoscopy in order to assess the potential benefits of the latter; the results were sometimes controversial. (2) Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search to identify our articles according to inclusion and exclusion criteria: to be included, each study had to be a prospective randomized trial or comparison between the McGrath videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope in an adult population. We did not include manikin trials or studies involving double-lumen tubes. (3) Results: 10 studies met the inclusion criteria necessary. In total, 655 patients were intubated with the McGrath and 629 with the Macintosh. In total, 1268 of 1284 patients were successfully intubated, showing equivalent results for the two devices: 648 of 655 patients with the McGrath videolaryngoscope and 620 of 629 patients with the Macintosh laryngoscope. No differences were noted in terms of hemodynamic changes or the incidence of adverse events. (4) Conclusions: We can assert that the McGrath videolaryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope, even if with equivalent tracheal intubation results, supplement each other.

McGrath® versus Macintosh laryngoscopes on hemodynamic response to intubation in elderly patients: a randomized clinical trial.

Introduction: laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation induce catecholaminergic release. Our study aimed to evaluate the hemodynamic impact of orotracheal intubation by McGrath® compared to the Macintosh laryngoscope in the elderly. Methods: we conducted a prospective randomized clinical trial that included elderly patients proposed for a scheduled surgery under general anesthesia with orotracheal intubation and divided into 2 groups: patients who were intubated using the McGrath® (group V) and patients who were intubated using the Macintosh direct laryngoscope (group M). Heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), were recorded before induction of anesthesia (baseline), and at 1 min, 3 min, and 5 min after intubation. Our outcomes were the increase of SBP (∆ SBP), MAP (∆ MAP), and HR (∆ HR) between the two groups, during the 5 minutes following the start of the orotracheal intubation, intubation time and the incidence of its related complications. Results: sixty patients were included and randomized into 2 groups of 30. The average age of our sample was 70±6 years with a sex ratio of 1.22. Most of the patients were operated on for orthopedic, urologic, or abdominal surgery. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of demographic characteristics and the duration of anesthesia (p> 0.05). The intubation time was significantly increased in group M (p≤0.001). There was a significant difference in SBP, MAP, and HR values at 1 min after orotracheal intubation compared with the baseline values in Group V(P<0,05) and Group M (p < 0.05). There was a significant increase in the first minute after tracheal intubation in terms of SBP (151±42 vs 134.5±26 mmHg, p=0.012), MAP (114±4 vs 102±17 mmHg, p=0.015), DBP (89±32 vs 84±16 mmHg, p=0.01), and HR (99.5±10 vs 94.5±2 b/min, p=0.008) when group M was compared to group V. The ∆SBP was significantly different between group M (∆SBP = 36.2±23.5mmHg) and group V (∆SBP= 30.77±21.6mmHg) (p = 0.005). There were 4 ventricular arrhythmias in group M versus zero in group V (p <0.0001). The postoperative sore throat was significantly decreased in group M vs V (p=0.036). Conclusion: the McGrath® videolaryngoscope decreased the hemodynamic fluctuations due to endotracheal intubation in elderly patients.

Non-channeled Video Laryngoscopy as an Alternative to Conventional Laryngoscopy for Intubating Adult Patients in the Intensive Care Unit.

Background Endotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit (ICU) is often a risky procedure due to the emergency situation, unstable condition of the patient, and technical problems such as inadequate positioning. Several new techniques, such as video laryngoscopy, have been developed recently to improve the success rate of first-pass intubations and reduce complications. We conducted this study to compare a non-channeled reusable video laryngoscope BPL VL-02 (manufactured by BPL Medical Technologies, Bangalore, India) with a conventional laryngoscope for intubation of adult patients in the ICU. Methodology A total of 72 ICU patients were randomly allocated to be intubated with either conventional direct laryngoscopy via Macintosh blade (group A) or video laryngoscopy with BPL VL-02 (group B). All patients were intubated by the primary investigator and the assistant noted the following parameters: the total number of intubation attempts, total duration of intubation, assistance or alternative technique required, Cormack Lehane grading, and any complications. Results There was no significant difference in the Cormack Lehane grading, number of attempts, or complications between the two groups. On comparing the assistance required during intubation in patients, it was observed that four (11.11%) patients in group A and seven (19.44%) patients in group B needed backward, upward, and rightward pressure on the larynx assistance during intubation. In five (13.89%) patients in group B, Stylet was required during intubation. The difference was statistically significant (p = 0.0308). The video laryngoscopy group (group B) had a longer mean duration of intubation (64.36 ± 6.28 seconds) compared to group A (45.72 ± 11.45 seconds), and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). Conclusions Non-channeled video laryngoscope (BPL VL-02) is not a suitable alternative to conventional direct laryngoscopy with a Macintosh blade in terms of successful first-pass intubation, total duration of intubation, and assistance required.

A Randomized Study of Rigid Video Stylet versus Macintosh Laryngoscope for Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tube Intubation Assistance in Thoracoscopic Pulmonary Surgery.

Double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) intubation is more challenging than single-lumen tube intubation is, and the rigid video stylet (RVS) is one of the tools that has emerged to deal with this demanding intubation procedure. We evaluated whether the UE® RVS can shorten the DLT intubation time and improve the first-attempt intubation success rate compared with that of Macintosh laryngoscope (ML). A total of 130 participants scheduled to undergo thoracoscopic pulmonary surgeries were enrolled. They were randomized to receive either ML- or RVS-assisted DLT intubation. The primary outcomes were the intubation time and first-attempt intubation success rate. The secondary outcomes were the overall intubation success rate, mean arterial pressure, postoperative sore throat (POST), and postoperative hoarseness at 1 h and 24 h. Compared with the ML group, the intubation time was significantly shorter in the RVS group (p < 0.001; 30.82 ± 10.61 vs. 39.62 ± 6.54 s), however, the first-attempt success rate was significantly lower (p = 0.048; 83.08% vs. 95.16%). The POST at 1 h was less severe in the RVS group (p = 0.021). No significant differences were found for the other indicators. Among the patients with normal airways, the UE® RVS can achieve faster DLT intubation and decrease the severity of a POST at 1 h, although it was associated with a lower first-attempt intubation success rate.

A Comparison of the bébé VieScope™ and Direct Laryngoscope for Use While Wearing PPE-AGP: A Randomized Crossover Simulation Trial.

This study aimed to compare the intubation effectiveness of the bébé Vie Scope™ (VieScope) and direct laryngoscopy for emergency intubation in a pediatric manikin model performed by paramedics with and without personal protective equipment for aerosol generating procedures (PPE-AGP). Participants performed endotracheal intubation using VieScope and standard Macintosh laryngoscope (MAC) in two research scenarios: (1) without PPE-AGP, and (2) with PPE-AGP. Fifty-one paramedics without any previous experience with the VieScope participated in this study. In the PPE-AGP scenario, in the VieScope group, the percentage of successful tracheal intubation on the first attempt was higher compared to the MAC group (94.1 vs. 78.4%, p = 0.031), intubation time was shorter (29.8 vs. 33.9 s, p < 0.001), and percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score was higher 91.0 vs 77.8 (p < 0.001). On the Cormack−Lehane scale, intubation with VieScope intubation was associated with higher scores rated at 1 (64.7 vs. 29.4%) than in the MAC group (p = 0.001). For intubation in the non-PPE scenario, there were no statistically significant differences between VieScope and MAC in relation to above parameters. Summarize, the bébé VieScope™ under PPE-AGP wearing conditions has proven to be a useful device for airway management in children providing better visualization of the larynx, better intubation conditions, and a higher success rate of tracheal intubation on the first attempt and reduced intubation time compared to the standard Macintosh laryngoscope.

Comparison of endotracheal intubation with Macintosh versus King Vision video laryngoscope using coronavirus disease 2019 barrier box on manikins: A randomized crossover study.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) virus usually spreads through aerosol and close contact. Frontline health-care workers handle aerosol-generating procedures like endotracheal intubation. To reduce this risk, COVID-19 barrier box came into the picture. However, the COVID-19 barrier box may compromise easy and successful intubation, and their limitation must be studied. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess the time to successful intubation with or without the COVID-19 barrier box using the Macintosh laryngoscope and King Vision video laryngoscope (KVVL). We also assessed the first-pass success rate, ease of intubation, Cormack-Lehane (CL) grade, and requirement of external laryngeal manipulation. METHODS: We conducted this manikin-based randomized crossover study to assess the time to successful intubation by anesthesiologists (22) and emergency physicians (11) having 1 year or more experience with or without COVID-19 barrier box by using the Macintosh laryngoscope and KVVL. Our study randomized the sequence of the four different intubation scenarios. RESULTS: The comparison of mean duration of intubation between KVVL (13.21 ± 4.05 s) and Macintosh laryngoscope (12.89 ± 4.28 s) with COVID-19 barrier box was not statistically significant (95% confidence interval: 1.21-0.97). The ease of intubation, number of attempts, and requirement of external laryngeal manipulation were not statistically significant. Intubations were statistically significant more difficult with barrier box in view of higher CL grade. CONCLUSION: Time to intubation was longer with COVID-19 barrier box using KVVL as compared to Macintosh laryngoscope which was statistically not significant.

An Evaluation of the Intubrite Laryngoscope in Simulated In-Hospital and Out-of-Hospital Settings by Individuals with No Clinical Experience: A Randomized, Cross-Over, Manikin Study.

Introduction: The aim of the study was to compare the Intubrite laryngoscope and the standard Macintosh blade laryngoscope (MCL) used by persons with no clinical experience in simulated hospital and non-hospital conditions on a manikin model. Materials and methods: The study involved 50 students of Medical Rescue. The hospital conditions (intubation height 110 cm­high position) and those occurring at the scene (intubation of a manikin located at floor level-low position) were simulated. The analysis included: duration of intubation, visibility of the laryngeal opening by the Cormack−Lehane scale, the bioelectrical activity of the intubating muscles, comfort and subjective assessment of physical effort by the Borg scale (Borg's scale of subjective feeling of effort). The statistical analysis was performed with Microsoft Excel and T-student tests for pairs with unequal variables. The statistical importance was set at p < 0.05. Results: The use of an Intubrite laryngoscope significantly reduces the mean endotracheal intubation time compared to the Macintosh laryngoscope in a low position (17.34 s versus 19.04 s, p < 0.05). A higher rate of repeat intubations was observed in a low position for MCL (from 10% to 14%, p < 0.05). The reverse is true for Intubrite laryngoscope intubation (from 8% to 4%, p < 0.05 Please explain what is compared). The Intubrite laryngoscope improved visualization of glottis in the high and the low positions compared to the Macintosh laryngoscope (54% and 50% to 52% and 38%, respectively, p < 0.05). The risk of tooth damage was the same for the Intubrite and the MCL laryngoscopes in a high position (16% and 14%, respectively, p > 0.05), while in the simulated out-of-hospital setting, it was significantly higher for the MCL (22% versus 8%, p < 0.05). The subjective comfort of intubation in both simulated situations was similar according to the Borg scale (p-value, values). The use of the Intubrite laryngoscope was associated with less effort than the MCL in high versus low positions. For MCL, intubation in a high position was associated with lower mean muscle activity than in a low position (+48.24 µV versus +58.25 µV, p-value). For the Intubrite laryngoscope, these values were at similar levels (+52.03 µV and +52.65 µV, p-value). Conclusions: The use of the Intubrite laryngoscope by people with no clinical experience shortens the time of intubation and improves the laryngeal view compared to the standard Macintosh laryngoscope, but it requires similar muscle work in simulated conditions.

Nasotracheal intubation performance with the mcgrath videolaryngoscope versus macintosh laryngoscope in oral and maxillofacial surgery- An observational study.

Background and Aim: Nasotracheal intubation is the main route to secure the airway in oral and maxillofacial surgery patients. This study was aimed to compare the intubation times and glottis visualization of McGrath video laryngoscope with the Macintosh laryngoscope for routine nasotracheal intubation. Materials and Methods: Records of seventy-one ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) I-II patients were evaluated and allocated into two groups (McGrath video laryngoscope (VL) and Macintosh groups). Intubation times, modified intubation difficulty scale (MIDS) scores, and hemodynamic parameters (heart rate and mean arterial pressure) were compared after the anesthesia induction and the intubation. Results: Mean intubation time in the McGrath group (24.9 ± 5.9 seconds) was significantly lower than that of the Macintosh group (28 ± 6.2 seconds; P = 0.037). Magill forceps were needed less in the McGrath group compared to the Macintosh group (13.89% vs. 42.86%; P = 0.009). Total MIDS scores were similar (P = 0.778). There was no significant difference in the hemodynamic parameters between the groups. Conclusion: The McGrath VL significantly reduced the intubation time and the use of Magill forceps compared with Macintosh direct laryngoscope and can be utilised effectively for routine nasotracheal intubation.

First-pass Success Rate and Number of Attempts Required for Intubation in Anticipated Difficult Airway: Comparison between Macintosh and Channeled King Vision Video Laryngoscopes.

Background and Aims: Video laryngoscopy has been shown to improvise Cormack-Lehane grading and rate of successful tracheal intubation and is now incorporated in most of the difficult airway guidelines. Since there is scarce literature regarding the use of channeled blade of King Vision video laryngoscope (KVVL) in anticipated difficult intubation, we planned to undertake this randomized control trial to assess the performance of channeled blade of KVVL and Macintosh laryngoscope in patients with anticipated difficult intubation. Design and Setting: This prospective randomized study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital. Materials and Methods: Patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned equally to the KVVL group or Macintosh group. The primary outcome of the study was intubation success in the first attempt and number of attempts required for intubation, and the secondary outcomes were Cormack-Lehane grading and time required to intubate in both the groups. Results: The first-pass success of intubation was 88.6% in the KVVL group and 76.5% in the Macintosh group (P = 0.035). The second attempt of intubation was required in 11.4% and 20.6% of patients in the KVVL and Macintosh groups, respectively. Cormack Lehane Grade I was achieved in 100% of patients of the KVVL group as compared to 29.4% of patients in the Macintosh group. Moreover, the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.035). The mean duration of intubation was prolonged in the KVVL group as compared to the Macintosh group, and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.04). Conclusion: The channeled blade of KVVL had a higher first-pass success rate and required fewer attempts to intubate when used in patients with anticipated difficult intubation. Further, the KVVL was found to be significantly better than the Macintosh laryngoscope in terms of Cormack-Lehane grading, but the time taken to intubate the trachea was more in the KVVL group.

Study of Changes in Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Following Tracheal Intubation Using Macintosh Laryngoscope or Fibreoptic-Guided Intubation Through Ambu Aura-I: A Randomised Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND: Neuroanaesthesiologists are faced with managing and optimising the intracranial pressure in the perioperative period. Laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation are known to increase sympathetic activity that is well tolerated by healthy patients but may be detrimental to many comorbid patients. We, therefore, hypothesised that airway management and tracheal intubation through Ambu Aura-I (Ambu, Baltorpbakken 13, Denmark) may be associated with lesser changes in optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) compared to conventional tracheal intubation and designed a study to ultrasonographically measure the changes in optic nerve sheath diameter following tracheal intubation using Macintosh laryngoscope or fibreoptic-guided intubation through Ambu Aura-I in patients receiving endotracheal anaesthesia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This randomised controlled hospital-based clinical study was conducted on 60 patients divided into two groups: group 1 (n=30, tracheal intubation facilitated by direct laryngoscopy with Macintosh laryngoscope) or group 2 (n=30, fibreoptic-guided tracheal intubation through Ambu Aura-I), undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia requiring tracheal intubation. RESULTS: Baseline parameters before induction of anaesthesia were recorded for further comparison. Baseline ONSD at 3 mm behind the globe in both eyes (before induction of anaesthesia), both in transverse and the coronal plane, was measured by transorbital sonography with the patient lying in the supine position using a portable Sonosite Turbo-M ultrasonography (Fujifilm Sonosite, Bothell, USA) machine. End-tidal carbon dioxide concentration (EtCO2) was also recorded at this time. Observations of HR, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean blood pressure (MBP), oxygen saturation (SpO2), EtCO2, and ONSD measurements were recorded immediately and at three and five minutes after intubation, and complications were recorded. Data collected were tabulated, and statistical analysis was done using SPSS 22.00 for windows (SPSS Inc, Chicago, USA). The ONSD increase peaked at 4.19±0.35 and 4.16±0.31 mm in right and left eyes. Like in group 1, the ONSD decreased slightly to 4.06±0,29 and 4.05±0.29 mm in right and left eyes in group 2 at 10 minutes after intubation. The changes in ONSD when compared to baseline values (before intubation) were statistically not significant (p>0.05). Between-group comparison in ONSD in both the eyes at different time intervals was statistically not significant (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: We conclude that fibreoptic-guided tracheal intubation through Ambu Aura-I is not superior to tracheal intubation using direct laryngoscopy with Macintosh laryngoscope in terms of its effect on intracranial pressure, as measured ultrasonographically by optic nerve sheath diameter.

Macintosh laryngoscope versus AMBU King Vision video laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation using a COVID-19 barrier box: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) barrier box is being used by health-care workers for protection against aerosol-transmitted infection. Usually, a Macintosh laryngoscope (MC) or a video laryngoscope (VL) is used for endotracheal intubation (ETI). We aimed to determine the most suitable laryngoscope blade in terms of time to ETI, ease of ETI, and the first-pass success rate. METHODS: American Society of Anesthesiologists Grade I and II patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia were randomized into the MC and the King Vision VL groups in a 1:1 ratio. ETI was performed using either the MC (the MC group) or the King Vision VL (the VL group) with a COVID-19 barrier box. The first-pass intubation success rate, intubation time, and ease of ETI were analyzed. RESULTS: The first-pass success rate was higher in the MC group (P = 0.43). The mean duration of ETI was 33 s and 47 s in the MC group and VL group, respectively. The difference was statistically significant between the groups (P = 0.002). The ease of ETI was comparable between the groups (P = 0.57), and the Cormack-Lehane grade was significantly different between the groups (P = 0.0025). CONCLUSION: ETI duration was shorter in the MC group than in the VL group. Hence, a MC can be used along with a COVID-19 barrier box by experienced operators for the prevention of aerosol spread.

A Comparative Study in Airway Novices Using King Vision Videolaryngoscope and Conventional Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope for Endotracheal Intubation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Tracheal intubation using laryngoscopy is a fundamental skill, for an anesthesiologist. However, teaching this skill is difficult since Macintosh direct laryngoscope (DL) allows only one individual to view the larynx during the procedure. Hence, this study aimed to determine whether King Vision® videolaryngoscope (KVL) provides any advantage over direct laryngoscopy in teaching this skill to airway novices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective randomized crossover study, Ethical Committee clearance was obtained from the institutional review board (MSRMC/EC/2017) and the study was registered with Clinical Trial Registry. After informed consent, 53 medical students were allotted to perform laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation on a manikin by using either KVL or Macintosh DL. The participants first performed laryngoscopy with either KVL or Macintosh DL following a brief instruction and then crossed over to the second arm of the study to perform laryngoscopy using the other scope. The primary outcome measure was the time for successful endotracheal intubation. The secondary outcome measures were incidence of esophageal intubation (EI), excess application of pressure on maxillary teeth excess maxillary pressure, and success rate. RESULTS: Mean time for endotracheal intubation was significantly faster using KVL than in DL (44.64 vs. 87.72 s; P < 0.001). No significant difference was found in the incidence of esophageal intubation 15.1% in KVL group versus 24.5% in DL group (P = 0.223). In the KVL group, 81.1% did not apply pressure on maxillary teeth versus 26.4% in the DL group (P < 0.001). The success rate of intubation was 100% in the KVL group versus 86.8% in the DL group (P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: The KVL is a more effective tool to teach endotracheal intubation in comparison to Macintosh laryngoscope in airway novice medical students. Clinical trial registry India registration number: CTRI/2017/11/010491.

A Comparative Study between Truview PCD Video Laryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope with Respect to Intubation Quality and Hemodynamic Changes.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Video laryngoscopes resemble traditional laryngoscopes, but they have a video chip embedded in the tip of laryngoscope blade. This enables the operator to "look around the corners" which is not possible with conventional direct laryngoscopes. The present study was undertaken to compare Truview video laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope for glottis visualization, ease of tracheal intubation, and associated hemodynamic response. SETTING: The study was conducted in operation theater in a medical college. STUDY DESIGN: It was a randomized prospective observational study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists Grade 1 and 2 of either sex aged 18-60 years who were scheduled to undergo elective surgery requiring general anesthesia with orotracheal intubation were selected. In patients of Group T (n = 30), intubation was done using Truview video laryngoscope, while in Group M (n = 30), intubation was done using Macintosh laryngoscope. Various airway and hemodynamic parameters were assessed and compared. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Statistical analysis was done using Chi-square test, paired and unpaired Student's t-test, and ANOVA test. P < 0.05 is considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Distribution of modified Mallampati Class (MMPC), ease of laryngoscopic blade insertion, and size of cuffed endotracheal tube used were statistically comparable in both the groups. The time to intubation was more in Group T (37.16 ± 8.23 s) as compared to Group M (29.80 ± 6.75 s). There was a statistically significant better modified Cormack and Lehane (CL) grading view obtained in Group T as compared to Group M (P = 0.025). CL Grades 2 and 3 were not seen in any of either of the group. The mean intubation difficulty score (IDS) was significantly lower in Group T (0.3 ± 0.60) as compared to Group M (0.73 ± 0.86). In both the Groups T and M, the mean heart rate, systolic blood pressure (BP), and diastolic BP were significantly increased from baseline for up to 3 min after laryngoscopy, but they were comparable between the two groups all the time. CONCLUSION: Truview propaganda cum distribution laryngoscope provides a better glottis view than the Macintosh laryngoscope. Although it requires a longer time to intubate using Truview, the overall IDS score was lower as compared to Macintosh laryngoscope. Hemodynamic changes remained similar in both the groups.

A comparison of intubating conditions for nasotracheal intubation with standard direct Macintosh laryngoscope versus C-MAC® video laryngoscope employing cuff inflation technique in adult patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: While performing laryngoscopy during nasotracheal intubation (NTI), the tip of the advancing endotracheal tube (ETT) generally lies along the posterior pharyngeal wall. The inflation of the ETT cuff brings it anterior towards the glottis. The present study was planned to compare the intubating conditions for NTI with standard direct Macintosh laryngoscope versus C-MAC® video laryngoscope (VL) employing ETT cuff inflation technique. METHODS: This prospective randomised study was carried out on 50 patients, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II, age 18-60 years of either sex with an indication for NTI under general anaesthesia. They were randomly divided into two groups: group VL (n = 25): C-MAC® VL and group ML (n = 25): Macintosh laryngoscope. The primary outcome was to compare the total duration of NTI (T), while the secondary outcomes were to compare the need for cuff inflation or assistance with Magill forceps for successful NTI, the total number of attempts to achieve successful NTI, haemodynamic effects and complications. RESULTS: T was significantly higher in group ML than group VL (P < 0.001). The intubation was successful with cuff inflation in all the patients in group VL, however, six patients of group ML required assistance with Magill forceps (P = 0.022). The haemodynamic parameters were all significantly higher at 3 min in group ML in comparison to group VL. CONCLUSION: The cuff inflation technique when used along with C-MAC® VL had more success rate, required lesser time and had minimal postoperative complications in comparison to the Macintosh laryngoscope.

Comparison of four channelled videolaryngoscopes to Macintosh laryngoscope for simulated intubation of critically ill patients: the randomized MACMAN2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Videolaryngoscopes with an operating channel may improve the intubation success rate in critically ill patients. We aimed to compare four channelled videolaryngoscopes to the Macintosh laryngoscope used for intubation of a high-fidelity simulation mannikin, in a scenario that simulated critical illness due to acute respiratory failure. RESULTS: Of the 79 residents who participated, 54 were considered inexperienced with orotracheal intubation. Each participant used all five devices in random order. The first-pass success rate was 97.5% [95% CI 91.1-99.7] for Airtraq™, KingVision™, and Pentax AWS200™, 92.4% [95% CI 84.2-97.2] for VividTrac VT-A100™, and 70.9% [95% CI 59.6-80.6] for direct Macintosh laryngoscopy. The first-pass success rate was significantly lower with direct Macintosh laryngoscopy than with the videolaryngoscopes (p < 0.0001 for Airtraq™, KingVision™, Pentax AWS200™, and VividTrac VT-A100™). CONCLUSION: The Airtraq™, KingVision™, and Pentax AWS200™ channelled videolaryngoscopes produced high first-pass success rates with a lower boundary of the 95% CI above 90%. A multicentre, randomised controlled clinical study comparing channelled videolaryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy should include one of these three videolaryngoscopes.

Haemodynamic responses following orotracheal intubation in patients with hypertension---Macintosh direct laryngoscope versus Glidescope®videolaryngoscope.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Glidescope®videolaryngoscope (GVL) is a video intubation system with 60° angle blade that provides excellent laryngeal view, does not require alignment of oral, pharyngeal, and laryngeal axes for visualisation of glottis, thus causing less stimulation of orolaryngopharynx. The aim of this study was to compare haemodynamic responses (blood pressure and heart rate) and airway morbidity using the Macintosh direct laryngoscope (MDL) and the Glidescope®videolaryngoscope (GVL) in hypertensive patients. METHODS: Fifty patients with hypertension controlled on antihypertensive medications scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia were randomly assigned to group GVL (n = 25) or group MDL (n = 25). Heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean blood pressure (MBP) were recorded at baseline, after induction, pre-intubation, at intubation, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 min after intubation. Time to intubation, number of attempts, complications during intubation, and postoperative airway complications (sore throat, hoarseness, dysphagia, and cough) were also recorded. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant increase in SBP, DBP, and MBP at intubation [(P = 0.003, 0.013, 0.03), 1 min (P = 0.001, 0.012, 0.02), 2 min (P = 0.04, 0.02, 0.04), and 3 min (P = 0.02, 0.01)] in the MDL group as compared to GVL group. The time to intubate was significantly greater in the GVL group as compared to MDL group (P = 0.0006). There was no significant difference in the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative airway complications. CONCLUSION: In the hands of an experienced anaesthesiologist, the use of GVL in controlled hypertensive patients is associated with less haemodynamic response as compared to Macintosh Laryngoscope without any increase in airway complications.

Randomized Prospective Comparison of Glidescope Video Laryngoscope with Macintosh Laryngoscope in Adult who Underwent Thyroid or Parathyroid Surgery Using Neuromonitorization.

OBJECTIVES: The present study aims to compare the effects of Glidescope Video Laryngoscope (GVL) and Machintosh Laryngoscope (ML) on the hemodynamic response, intubation time and mucosal damage in adult patients who underwent thyroid or parathyroid surgery using neuromonitorization. METHODS: In this study, 180 patients, aged between 22 and 65 classified as Class I-II in ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) and operated under elective conditions were included. Patients were assigned into two groups: Patients intubated with GVL Group G (n=90) and patients intubated with ML Group M (n=90). In both groups, intubation time and the number of trials were recorded. HR (Heart Rate), SpO2 (Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation), SBP (Systolic Blood Pressure), DBP (Diastolic Blood Pressure) and MBP (Mean Blood Pressure) scores were recorded at preinduction, post-induction, post-intubation and three minutes after intubation. Post-operative intubation-associated complications were recorded. RESULTS: Post intubation HR, DBP and MBP scores were found to be significantly higher in Group M than Group G (p=0,006, p=0.013, p=0.011). Intubation time was found to be significantly higher in Group G than in group M (35.3±10.3, 22.1±7.7 sec). There was no significant difference between the groups' number of trials and intubation-associated complications. CONCLUSION: Despite its long intubation time, we believe that GVL may be the first choice laryngoscopy method in the thyroid or parathyroid cases that intubated with a low dose muscle relaxant for neuromonitoring since it has a slight effect than ML on hemodynamism it does not increase mucosal damage and has improved visibility.

Video Assisted Laryngoscope Facilitates Intubation Skill Learning in the Emergency Department.

BACKGROUND: Up-to-date technology has been increasingly useful for learning resuscitation skills in the emergency and resuscitation settings. It improves the learning curve of the learners and helps them to avoid making mistakes on real patients. This study aimed to evaluate the educational efficiency for tracheal intubation by comparing Macintosh (direct) laryngoscope (DL) and video laryngoscope (VL) learning in novices. METHODS: This prospective randomized controlled study was conducted in an emergency department between 2013 and 2014. Fifth- and sixth-year medical students were enrolled and assigned to normal airway and difficult airway groups, respectively. They were then further randomized into using a VL or DL for tracheal intubation learning. Participants had three practices before proceeding to the post-course assessment. Our primary outcome was post-course assessment performance, which included intubation success rate, total intubation time and best glottic view. The secondary outcome was the sum of total intubation learning times during the three practices. RESULTS: We recruited 177 undergraduate students. Of these, 97 were assigned to the normal airway group (49 VL and 48 DL) and 80 were placed in the difficult airway group (40 each for VL and DL). VL significantly quickened the intubation learning time in both the normal airway and difficult airway groups (140 s vs. 158 s, 141 s vs. 221.5 s; both p < 0.05). The learning curve was much improved with VL when compared using time-to-event analysis (p < 0.001). VL also improved the glottic view performance during post-course assessments. CONCLUSIONS: VL improves the learning curve in acquiring intubation skills compared with traditional DL. It shortens the time undergraduate students take to develop such skills and increased their first attempt success rates.