ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: We wished to assess the merits and weaknesses of postcontrast fat-suppression (FS) brain MR imaging in children for the evaluation of various enhancing lesions as compared with postcontrast conventional T1-weighted or magnetization transfer (MT) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of those patients with enhancing lesions on brain MR imaging who had undergone both FS imaging and one of the conventional T1-weighted or MT imaging as a postcontrast T1-weighted brain MR imaging. Thirty-one patients (21 male, 10 female; mean age, 8.7 years) with 38 enhancing lesions (18 intra-axial, 16 extra-axial and 4 orbital locations) were included in this study. There were 27 pairs of FS and conventional imagings, and 13 pairs of FS and MT imagings available for evaluation. Two radiologists visually assessed by consensus the lesions' conspicuity, and they also looked for the presence of flow or susceptibility artifacts in a total of 40 pairs of MR imagings. For 19 measurable lesions (14 pairs of FS and conventional T1-weighted imagings, 5 pairs of FS and MT imagings), the contrast ratios between the lesion and the normal brain ([SIlesion-SIwater]/[SInormal brain-SIwater]) were calculated and compared. RESULTS: Compared with conventional imaging, the lesion conspicuity on FS imaging was better in 10 cases (7 extra-axial lesions, 2 orbital lesions and 1 fat-containing intra-axial lesion), equal in 16 cases, and worse in one case. Compared with MT imaging, the lesion conspicuity on FS imaging was better in 3 cases (2 extra-axial lesions and 1 intra-axial lesion), equal in 8 cases, and worse in 2 cases. Image quality of FS imaging was compromised by flow or susceptibility artifacts for 7 patients. The contrast ratios for FS imaging were not significantly different from those for conventional imaging (2.2+/-0.7 vs. 2.2+/-0.6, respectively, p=0.914) and they were significantly lower than those for MT imaging (2.4+/-0.8 vs. 4.5+/-1.5, respectively, p=0.018). CONCLUSION:Postcontrast FS brain MR imaging appears to be better than the conventional T1-weighted imaging and comparable to MT imaging for the visual assessment of enhancing lesions. Especially, the FS imaging has the merit to delineate orbital and extra-axial enhancing lesions or fat-containing lesions, whereas it is disadvantageous when flow or susceptibility artifacts occur.
Subject(s)
Child , Female , Humans , Male , Artifacts , Brain , Consensus , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , OrbitABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of magnetization transfer contrast(MTC) andfat-suppression(FS) in variable spin-echo and gradient-echo sequences for articular cartilage imaging and todetermine the optimal pulse sequences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using variable 7-pulse sequences, the knees of 15pigs were imaged Axial images were obtained using proton density and T2-weighted spin-echo (PDWSE and T2WSE),turbo spin-echo (TSE), multiplanar gradient-echo (MPGR), and 3D steady-state gradient-echo (3DGRE) sequences, andthe same pulse sequences were then repeated using MTC. Also T1-weighted spin-echo(T1WSE) and 3D spoiledgradient-echo(3DSPGR) images of knees were also acquired, and the procedure was repeated using FS. For each knee,a total of 14 axial images were acquired, and using a 6-band scoring system, the visibility of and thevisibilities of the the articular cartilage was analyzed. The visual effect of MTC and FS was scored using a4-band scale. For each image, the signal intensities of articular cartilage, subchondral bone, muscles, and salinewere measured, and signal-to-noise ratios(SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratios(CNR) were also calculated. RESULTS: Visibility of the cartilage was best when 3DSPGR and T1WSE sequences were used. MTC imaging increased the negativecontrast between cartilage and saline, but FS imaging provided more positive contrast. CNR between cartilage andsaline was highest when using TSE with FS(-3 5 1 . 1 +/-15.3), though CNR between cartilage and bone then fell to-1 4 . 7 +/-10.8. In MTC imaging using MPGR showed the greatest increase of negative contrast between cartilage andsaline(CNR change=-74.7); the next highest was when 3DGRE was used(CNR change=-34.3). CNR between cartilage andbone was highest with MPGR(161.9 +/-17.7), but with MTC, the greatest CNR decrease(-81.8) was observed. Thegreatest CNR increase between cartilage and bone was noted in T1WSE with FS. In all scans, FS provided acartilage-only positive contrast image, though the absolute value of CNR was lower than that of MTC imaging. CONCLUSION: The most prominent effects of MTC and FS were seen in MPGR and T1WSE, respectively, though forcartilage, optimal high signal intensity and contrast can be achieved using 3DGRE with MTC, and 3DSPGR with FS.
Subject(s)
Cartilage , Cartilage, Articular , Knee , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Muscles , ProtonsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To compare the value of Gd-DTPA enhanced, fat-suppression T1-weighted (Gd-FST1SE) MR images in thediagnosis of female pelvic disorders with that of fast spin-echo T1-weighted(T1FSE) and fast spin-echoT2-weighted(T2FSE) MR images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pelvic MR images of 42 women (24 ovarian disorders, 19uterine disorders) were reviewed by two radiologists. Discrimination of normal anatomic structures, identificationof pathologic lesions and recognition of internal structure of the lesions such as solid and cystic portion,papillary nodule, septa and wall were evaluated using a scoring system. The Friedman two-way ANOVA test was usedfor data analysis. RESULT: T2FSE was useful for evaluation of the uterine cervix(T1/T2/Gd, 2.5/3.9/2.8,respectively), junctional zone(1.6/3.1/2.5), endometrium (2.0/3.3/3.0), ovary(1.1/2.1/1.7) and uterine myoma(1.7/2.4/2.1)(P<0.001), but secondary degeneration was best visualized on Gd-FS T1SE. The Gd-FS T1SE ;lymphadenopathy(3.4/1.5/3.7) was better visualised on this modality than on eithor TIFSE or T2FSE. Gd-FS T1SEimages also clearly depicted papillary projection(2.4/3.1/3.8) and the solid component (2.9/3.1/3.5) of ovariancystic neoplasm(P<0.01). The confidence level in the identification of ovarian mass, internal septation andsurrounding wall of cystic neoplasm was not improved on Gd-FS T1SE. CONCLUSION: The Gd-FS T1SE images were usefulfor the evaluation of metastatic lymphadenopathy in uterine cervical malignancy and for identification of thesolid component and papillary projection of ovarian cystic neoplasm.
