Outcome of Obstructing vs Nonobstructing Colorectal Carcinomas: Comparative Study at Tertiary Care Hospital in Kashmir.

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the commonly diagnosed malignancy presenting either in obstruction or without obstruction. Bowel obstruction (BO) is usually a complication of advanced cancer, significantly reducing the quality of life. We aimed to study the outcomes of these obstructed colorectal cancers requiring emergency intervention and compare it with nonobstructed cancers. Materials and methods: In our observational comparative study, patients were divided into groups on basis of their presentation and site of lesion: nonobstructing colon group/obstructing colon group nonobstructing rectum group/obstructing rectum group. Results: A total of 232 patients with known modes of presentation between 2015 and 2018 were included; 144 colonic, 88 rectal carcinomas with 71 being completely obstructive ones. Our study showed higher recurrence in obstructive groups with local recurrence being more common. The median interval for recurrence was early in obstructive group (p < 0.001*). The overall 5-year survival rates were better in Nonobstructing colon group, (p = -0.046* in OR vs NOR) (p = -0.031* in OC vs NOC). 5-year disease-free survival rates statistically insignificant (p = 0.203 in NOC and OC groups), (p = 0.307 in NOR and OR groups). Immediate post-op, complications except for SSI, there was no significant difference between the two groups. Our study showed higher proportion of R0 resection in NOC groups as compared with obstructive groups (p = 0.021* in in OC vs NOC and p = 0.037* in OR vs NOR) with better lymph node retrieval in NOC groups. Conclusion: On comparing outcome of patients who had completed multi-modal therapy in both groups, there was significantly better outcome for patients who have presented without obstruction. How to cite this article: Ul Haq MF, Bhat GA, Wani MA, et al. Outcome of Obstructing vs Nonobstructing Colorectal Carcinomas: Comparative Study at Tertiary Care Hospital in Kashmir. Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2024;14(1):75-80.

Palliative Intervention for Malignant Bowel Obstruction Comes at a Cost: A National Inpatient Study.

Background: Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) due to peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is associated with poor outcomes. Optimal management for palliation remains unclear. This study aims to characterize nonoperative, procedural, and operative management strategies for MBO and evaluate its association with mortality and cost.Materials and Methods: ICD-10 coding identified patient admissions from the 2018 to 2019 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) for MBO with PC from gastrointestinal or ovarian primary cancers. Management was categorized as nonoperative, procedural, or surgical. Multivariate analysis was used to associate treatment with mortality and cost.Results: 356,316 patient admissions were identified, with a mean age of 63 years. Gender, race, and insurance status were similar among groups. Length of stay (LOS) was longest in the surgical group (surgical: 17 days; procedural: 14 days; nonoperative: 7 days; P = .001). In comparison to nonoperative, procedural and surgical patients had statistically higher hospital charges, post-discharge medical needs, palliative care consults, and admission to rehab centers. Mortality was 7% in nonoperative, 9% in procedural, and 8% in surgical (P = .007) groups. In adjusted analyses, older age, palliative care consult, and non-Medicare payer status were associated with higher mortality. Compared to nonoperative, procedural and surgical groups resulted in increased costs (procedural: $17K more; surgical: $30K more).Conclusions: Admissions for procedural and surgical treatment of MBO are associated with increased LOS, hospital costs, and discharge needs. Optimal management remains challenging. Clinicians must examine all options prior to recommending palliative interventions given a trend towards higher resource utilization and mortality.

Bowel Emergencies in Patients With Cancer.

Cancer is the second most common cause of death worldwide. Bowel emergencies in patients with cancer are becoming increasingly more prevalent due to advances in cancer therapy and longer overall patient survival. When these patients present acutely, they are often frail and may have pre-existing co-morbidities. This article discusses the imaging features of bowel emergencies commonly encountered in oncological patients in clinical practice. These include chemotherapy related colitis, neutropenia enterocolitis and typhlitis, toxic megacolon, bowel perforation, malignant bowel obstruction and gastrointestinal haemorrhage. The radiologist plays a key role in identifying these oncological emergencies and guiding further management.

Factors Predicting Readmission and Mortality in Patients Admitted for Malignant Bowel Obstruction.

INTRODUCTION: Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) is a common complication of patients with advanced malignancies and has poor prognosis. Currently, there are limited guidelines for MBO management or predicting outcomes for these patients. OBJECTIVE: To identify patient factors associated with readmission and mortality after hospital admission for MBO. PARTICIPANTS: A 5-year retrospective review was performed from 2017 to 2022 at a single tertiary institution to evaluate patients admitted for MBO. All patients had advanced cancer of gastrointestinal or gynecologic primary. Patient demographics, socioeconomic factors, tumor characteristics, and inpatient outcomes were collected. Multivariable analyses were performed to determine variables predicting hospital readmission for recurrent MBO and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: 210 patients were included. Mean age was 61 years, 28% were male, and 19% did not primarily speak English. 35% of patients lived over 50 miles from the hospital. On multivariable analysis, non-English speaking patients exhibited increased risk of readmission for MBO (OR = 2.82, P = .039). Older age was associated with decreased risk for MBO readmission (OR = .96, P = .007). Ascites was associated with increased mortality (OR = 2.17, P = .043). Earlier palliative care (PC) consultation predicted decreased readmission (OR = .24, P < .001) yet increased mortality at 90 days (OR = 3.20, P = .003). CONCLUSION: Patient age, primary language, and PC consult were predictors for MBO readmission, which may impact 90-day mortality. Given the palliative nature of MBO, modifiable factors such as PC consultation and multidisciplinary goals of care discussions should be prioritized in order to reduce readmissions and focus on quality of life (QOL) for this patient population.

Outcomes of parenteral nutrition in patients with advanced cancer and malignant bowel obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) affects 3% to 15% of all cancer patients. In patients with advanced cancer and inoperable MBO, the average survival varies between four to nine weeks. Parenteral nutrition (PN) may improve survival in specific patient populations with malignant bowel obstruction. AIMS: This retrospective, single-center cohort study aimed to review individual patient outcomes on PN in the setting of advanced cancer with a diagnosis of MBO and identify clinical and laboratory markers predictive of short- and long-term survival to further highlight patients that would benefit from PN in the setting of an inoperable MBO. RESULTS: In a retrospective analysis of 68 patients receiving PN for inoperable MBO, the median survival was 142 (IQR: 63.3-239.5) days. Patients experienced a median number of two hospital readmissions (range: 0-10) and spent a median of 29 days (range: 0-105) in the hospital after starting PN. Eighteen (26.5%) patients developed a catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI). A diagnosis of appendiceal cancer was identified as a predictive marker of improved survival (HR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.29-0.92, p = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: The use of PN in the context of end-of-life cancer care is a practice that necessitates improvement. Recognizing the outcomes and patient experiences of PN utilization is essential to physicians and patients.

Octreotide for long-lasting malignant bowel obstruction: two case reports.

BACKGROUND: Efficacy of the combination of octreotide and other drugs for the management of malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) has been well described. However, long-lasting stages with lack of stool emission are a challenging clinical condition of MBO that have never described. CASE DESCRIPTION: We describe two cases in which the addition of octreotide to supportive care measures, even given late after more than 3 weeks of no stool emission, resulted to be still effective in recovering the bowel transit. In the first case, a patient admitted to home palliative care had a nasogastric tube and reported to not have stool emission and passing gas for 25 days. Two days after starting the combination of octreotide and other drugs, the patient evacuated and the nasogastric tube was removed, without reporting nausea or episodes of vomiting. In the second case, a patient admitted to an acute palliative care unit, the patient had no stool emission for more than 3 weeks. A nasogastric tube was placed and comprehensive palliative care treatment was provided. Two days after starting a combination of octreotide and other drugs, the nasogastric tube was removed, without reporting vomiting. In both cases, bowel transit recovered and patients were able to initiate oral nutrition. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of octreotide with other drugs described for standard treatment for the management of MBO, should be attempted even in patients with very long periods of lack of feces emission.

Nutrición parenteral domiciliaria en pacientes con obstrucción intestinal maligna / Consideraciones éticas Home parenteral nutrition in patients with malignant bowel obstruction. Ethical considerations

Introducción: los pacientes con cáncer constituyen uno de los principales grupos de pacientes dentro de los programas de nutrición parenteraldomiciliaria (NPD). Existe un grupo de pacientes con obstrucción intestinal maligna (OIM) en quienes el uso de la NPD es controvertido. Desdeel Grupo de ética de la SENPE se revisan las cuestiones éticas detrás de la decisión de iniciar la NPD en un paciente con OIM y se propone unapropuesta de acción.Método: se procedió a hacer una revisión crítica de la literatura, tras la cual se diseñaron las preguntas que este documento pretendía responder:¿Está indicado el uso de la NPD en pacientes con OIM? ¿En qué situaciones? Quedarían otros aspectos que también merecen una reflexión:¿Cualquier oncólogo puede enviar a un paciente a su domicilio con NPD? ¿Debe ser el programa de formación de los cuidados en la NPD igualque el referente a los pacientes con fracaso intestinal de causa benigna? ¿Se debe suspender la NPD en algún momento?Resultados: la NPD en pacientes con OIM consigue mejores resultados en aquellos con una buena situación funcional (índice de Karnofsky≥ 50 o ECOG ≤ 2), con un pronóstico vital superior a 2-3 meses e, idealmente, con niveles de marcadores inflamatorios bajos. En los escasostrabajos publicados en los que se valoran las ventajas sobre la calidad de vida, se concluye que la NPD permite a los pacientes disponer de untiempo valioso en su domicilio pero a costa de una carga significativa para ellos mismos y sus familias.Propuesta de acción: una vez considerado como candidato a la NPD, se debe tener una conversación abierta con el paciente y sus familiaresen la que se aborden los beneficios potenciales, las implicaciones prácticas y los riesgos. En esa conversación inicial debe también plantearse enqué momento considerar la retirada de la NPD. El responsable de la NPD es el equipo de soporte domiciliario en colaboración con el de nutriciónclínica.(AU)

Background: patients with cancer are one of the main group of patients on home parenteral nutrition (HPN). Patients with malignant bowelobstruction (MBO) represent a challenging group when considering HPN. At the Ethics Working Group of SENPE ethical considerations on thissubject were reviewed and a guidelines proposal was made.Methods: a literature search was done and a full set of questions arose: When, if ever, is HPN indicated for patients with MBO? How shouldthe training program be? When withdrawal of HPN should be considered? Other questions should be also taken into consideration. May anyOncologist send home a patient with HPN? The educational program could be shortened? When considering to withdraw parenteral nutrition?Results: HPN in MBO has better outcomes when patients have a good functional status (Karnofsky ≥ 50 or ECOG ≤ 2), expected survival > 2-3months, and low inflammatory markers. Very few data have been reported on quality of life, but HPN allows a valuable time at home albeit witha considerable burden for both patients and their families.Proposal: once a patient is considered for HPN, there is a need for a deep talk on the benefits, complications and risks. In this initial talk, whenHNP should be stopped needs to be included. The palliative care team with the help of the nutrition support team should follow the patient, whoseclinical status must be assessed regularly. HPN should be withdrawn when no additional benefits are achieved.Conclusion: HPN may be considered an option in patients with MBO when they have a fair or good functional status and a desire to spendtheir last days at home.(AU)

Metastatic Uterine Leiomyosarcoma presenting as small bowel intussusception at two independent visits.

•Metastatic disease to the small bowel may present with intussusception.•Clinical decision making for malignant bowel obstruction is difficult and individual specific.•Malignant bowel obstruction due to metastatic year has an average life expectancy of less than 200 days.

Palliative Management of Inoperable Malignant Bowel Obstruction: Prospective, Open Label, Phase 2 Study at an NCI Comprehensive Cancer Center.

CONTEXT: Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) is a common complication of intra-abdominal cancer, frequently seen in advanced gastrointestinal and gynecologic cancer. Management of MBO can be challenging, particularly if the patient is not a surgical candidate. No consensus exists on how best to manage these patients medically. Retrospective studies suggest that the combination of dexamethasone, octreotide and metoclopramide may lead to relief of obstruction and improvement in symptoms associated with the obstruction. OBJECTIVES: This study seeks to prospectively evaluate the combination of drug "triple therapy" dexamethasone 4 mg BID, metoclopramide 10 mg Q6 and octreotide 300 mcg TID to assess tolerability, safety, and effect on symptoms and deobstruction. METHODS: Adults admitted at Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center with malignant bowel obstruction were eligible. Eligible patients who constented to the study were started on the triple therapy with close monitoring of symptoms and for adverse effects. RESULTS: A total of 15 patients enrolled in the study. Two patients experienced bradycardia as adverse effect and there was no incidence of bowel perforation. All patients who completed the study had complete resolution of their nausea, and improvement in other symptoms including pain, constipation, tolerance of oral intake and resumption of bowel movements. Only two of the 15 patients were alive to complete the six-month post study follow up. CONCLUSION: "Triple therapy" with dexamethasone, metoclopramide, and octreotide for management of nonsurgical MBO in this small sample size appears safe and well tolerated however a diagnosis of inoperable MBO remains associated with poor prognosis and death within months.

Outcomes of parenteral nutrition in patients with advanced cancer and malignant bowel obstruction.

Background: Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) affects 3-15% of all cancer patients. In patients with advanced cancer and inoperable MBO, the average survival varies between four to nine weeks. Parenteral nutrition (PN) may improve survival in specific patient populations with malignant bowel obstruction. Aims: This retrospective, single-center cohort study aimed to review individual patient outcomes on PN in the setting of advanced cancer with a diagnosis of MBO and identify clinical and laboratory markers predictive of short- and long-term survival to further highlight patients that would benefit from PN in the setting of an inoperable MBO. Results: In a retrospective analysis of 68 patients receiving PN for inoperable MBO, the median survival was 142 (IQR: 63.3-239.5) days. Patients experienced a median number of two hospital readmissions (range: 0-10) and spent a median of 29 days (range: 0-105) in the hospital after starting PN. Eighteen (26.5%) patients developed a catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI). A diagnosis of appendiceal cancer was identified as a predictive marker of improved survival (HR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.29-0.92, p = 0.023). Conclusions: The use of PN in the context of end-of-life cancer care is a practice that necessitates improvement. Recognizing the outcomes and patient experiences of PN utilization is essential to physicians and patients.

Complex Surgical Intervention for Small Bowel Obstruction Secondary to Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Small bowel obstruction (SBO) refers to the inability of contents to pass through the lumen of the small intestine. This is a common surgical emergency in the United States. Although intra-abdominal adhesions are the predominant cause, SBO can occur secondarily to various etiologies, be it one cause or several. Management of SBO secondary to adhesions and metastasized rectal adenocarcinoma, complicated by pulmonary, hepatic, and ureteral disease, highlights the criticality of a multidisciplinary approach. We present a case of a 59-year-old male with SBO secondary to rectal adenocarcinoma. Treatment included surgical resection, acute stabilization, referral for outpatient surgical follow-up, and oncologic management.

Feasibility of Home Parenteral Nutrition in Patients with Intestinal Failure Due to Neuroendocrine Tumours: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: Maintaining adequate nutritional status can be a challenge for patients with small bowel neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). Surgical resection could result in short bowel syndrome (SBS), whilst without surgical resection there is a considerable risk of ischemia or developing an inoperable malignant bowel obstruction (IMBO). SBS or IMBO are forms of intestinal failure (IF) which might require treatment with home parenteral nutrition (HPN). Limited data exist regarding the use of HPN in patients with small bowel neuroendocrine tumours, and it is not frequently considered as a possible treatment. METHODS: A systematic review was performed regarding patients with small bowel NETs and IF to report on overall survival and HPN-related complications and create awareness for this treatment. RESULTS: Five articles regarding patients with small bowel NETs or a subgroup of patients with NETs could be identified, mainly case series with major concerns regarding bias. The studies included 60 patients (range 1-41). The overall survival time varied between 0.5 and 154 months on HPN. However, 58% of patients were alive 1 year after commencing HPN. The reported catheter-related bloodstream infection rate was 0.64-2 per 1000 catheter days. CONCLUSION: This systematic review demonstrates the feasibility of the use of HPN in patients with NETs and IF in expert centres with a reasonable 1-year survival rate and low complication rate. Further research is necessary to compare patients with NETs and IF with and without HPN and the effect of HPN on their quality of life.

CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Percutaneous Gastrostomy in the Palliative Management of Advanced and Relapsed Ovarian Cancer: The Charité Experiences and a Review of the Literature.

Peritoneal carcinomatosis-associated malignant bowel obstruction is a common feature that merits more attention in advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer. Decompressive gastrostomy is one of the most preferred methods to palliate distressing symptoms and maintain patients' quality of life. We retrospectively identified 31 patients with ovarian cancer-associated MBO, who underwent decompressive CT fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous gastrostomy (CT-PG) between September 2015 and April 2023 at our institution. A systematic literature review was conducted for CT-guided gastrostomy in ovarian cancer. Prior to CT-PG, 27 (87%) patients underwent unsuccessful attempts at endoscopic gastrostomy or surgery due to bowel obstruction; a total of 55% had received ≥3 lines of chemotherapy. CT-PG could be successfully inserted in 25 of 31 (81%) patients without grade 4-5 complications. CT-PG insertion was feasible in 76% of patients with previous unsuccessful attempts of endoscopic gastrostomy. A total of 80% of patients with a successful insertion had considerable symptom relief and could tolerate fluid intake. Mean survival after the procedure was 44.4 days. Chemotherapy could be administered in 7 of 25 (28%) patients following the CT-PG insertion. CT-guided percutaneous gastrostomy is a safe procedure that effectively manages intractable symptoms of bowel obstruction in ovarian cancer. This minimally invasive technique should be emphasised as a routine instrument within the palliative management of MBO.

The holistic management of malignant bowel obstruction in women with advanced ovarian cancer at end of life.

Bowel obstruction is commonly a pre-terminal event in women with advanced ovarian cancer. Management of symptoms will often be the focus rather than surgical intervention. Determining the patient's end-of-life wishes is paramount - because the prognosis for these patients can be short, advanced care planning is key. This case study will explore the management of nausea and vomiting associated with malignant bowel obstruction and demonstrate how a patient's psychological and social wellbeing is as important as managing the physical symptoms. It will discuss how skilled and effective communication is vital early in the disease trajectory in ensuring the patient's needs are met. Additionally, by undertaking a thorough holistic needs assessment, all aspects of end-of-life care can be discussed with the patient and family, which may enable the achievement of a preferred place of care and a peaceful, dignified death. Multidisciplinary working and co-ordination of care may allow for quick interventions, meeting individual needs and symptoms being managed more effectively.

Readmission and Disposition in Patients With Malignant Bowel Obstructions Following Gastrostomy Tube.

BACKGROUND: Patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) can develop malignant bowel obstructions (MBOs) requiring inpatient admission and nasogastric tube decompression. Palliative decompressive gastrostomy tubes (G-tubes) may affect patient disposition, allowing for self-management and reduction in inpatient services. Therefore, we sought to assess disposition and inpatient readmission rates in patients admitted with PC and MBO following G-tube placement. METHODS: The Vizient® Clinical Data Base was queried for inpatient admissions from October 2018 to May 2022 utilizing ICD-10 codes to identify patients admitted with PC and bowel obstruction, with or without G-tube placement. Demographics and hospital outcomes were recorded. Descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed. RESULTS: From 750 patients, 59 (7.9%) had a G-tube placed. Compared to patients without G-tubes, those with G-tubes had lower rates of disposition to home (32.2% vs 70.0%, P < .001) and higher rates of disposition to hospice (home: 30.5% vs 7.8%, P < .001, facility: 10.2% vs 3.9%, P = .02). There was no significant difference in the rate (17.3% vs 22.3%, P = .40) or risk (OR = 1.44, 95% CI .69-3.01) of 30-day readmissions with G-tubes. However, palliative care consultation (OR 33.77, 95% CI 19.16-59.52) and G-tube placement (OR 5.82, 95% CI 2.56-13.25) were independent predictors for hospice. DISCUSSION: Placement of G-tubes in patients with PC and MBO was associated with higher rates of disposition to hospice but there is no difference in 30-day readmission rates compared to those without G-tubes. Further prospective studies are needed to understand the role of G-tube placement in patients with MBO in relation to outcomes and disposition.

Colonic stenting in acute malignant large bowel obstruction: audit of efficacy and safety in a Singapore tertiary referral centre.

Introduction: Acute malignant large bowel obstruction (MBO) occurs in 8%-15% of colorectal cancer patients. Self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) have progressed from a palliative modality to use as bridge to surgery (BTS). We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of SEMS for MBO in our institution. Methods: The data of patients undergoing SEMS insertion for MBO were reviewed. Technical success was defined as successful SEMS deployment across tumour without complications. Clinical success was defined as colonic decompression without requiring further surgical intervention. Rates of complications, median time to surgery, types of surgery and rates of recurrence were studied. Results: Seventy-nine patients underwent emergent SEMS placement from September 2013 to February 2020. Their mean age was 68.8 ± 13.8 years and 43 (54%) patients were male. Mean tumour length was 4.2 cm ± 2.2 cm; 89.9% of malignant strictures were located distal to the splenic flexure. Technical and clinical success was 94.9% and 98.7%, respectively. Perforation occurred in 5.1% of patients, with none having stent migration or bleeding. Fifty (63.3%) patients underwent SEMS insertion as BTS. Median time to surgery was 20 (range 6-57) days. Most (82%) patients underwent minimally invasive surgery. Primary anastomosis rate was 98%. Thirty-nine patients had follow-up beyond 1-year posttreatment (median 34 months). Local recurrence and distant metastasis were observed in 4 (10.3%) and 5 (12.8%) patients, respectively. Conclusion: Insertion of SEMS for acute MBO has high success rates and a good safety profile. Most patients in this audit underwent minimally invasive surgery and primary anastomosis after successful BTS.

Palliative surgery as a bridge to systemic treatment for malignant bowel obstruction due to peritoneal metastases: A retrospective, case-control study.

BACKGROUND: High-quality data on palliative surgery in patients with malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) caused by peritoneal metastases (PM) are lacking. We aimed to determine the utility of palliative surgery for such patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients considered for surgery for MBO, caused by PM, in our department from January 2019 to October 2020. None of them could tolerate a diet, despite conservative treatment. We investigated the clinical characteristics and perioperative outcomes and calculated overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed, with the log-rank test to evaluate differences in OS rates. Multivariate Cox regression was performed to determine prognostic factors. RESULTS: Sixty (67%) patients underwent surgery, whereas, 30 (33%) received the best supportive care (BSC) treatment. A better (p = 0.002) median OS was observed in patients undergoing surgery (3.9 months) than in those receiving BSC (2.6 months). Severe complications were observed in 12 (20%) patients, including 30-day mortality (7 patients). Forty-eight (80%) patients in the surgery group could tolerate a diet and the hospital stay (mean ± standard deviation) was 20.0 ± 23.1 days. Re-obstruction was observed in five (8.3%) patients after 78.6 ± 63.3 days. Patients in the postoperative chemotherapy group exhibited a better (p < 0.001) median OS (12.3 months) than did those in the no-postoperative chemotherapy group (3.5 months). Only postoperative chemotherapy (hazard ratio 0.264, 95% confidence interval 0.143-0.487, p < 0.001) was identified as an independent prognostic factor. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with BSC, surgery is associated with a better OS in patients with MBO due to PM. Surgery should be considered as a bridge to systemic treatment for such patients.

Which preoperative immunonutritional index best predicts postoperative mortality after palliative surgery for malignant bowel obstruction in patients with late-stage cancer? A single-center study in Japan comparing the modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), the prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and the controlling nutritional status (CONUT).

PURPOSE: To compare the utility of preoperative immunonutritional parameter measures for predicting postoperative mortality following palliative surgery (PS) for malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) in patients with late-stage cancer. METHODS: The subjects of this retrospective study were 83 late-stage cancer patients with MBO who underwent PS between January, 2005 and December, 2018, at a single institution in Japan. We compared the modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), the prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) for predicting postoperative mortality following PS in these patients. RESULTS: The most prevalent cancer in the patients who underwent PS was colorectal cancer (54.2%), followed by gastric cancer (24.1%). Postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo classification grade ≥ 2 developed in 32 (38.6%) patients and stoma-related complications developed in 26 (31.3%) patients. There were 15 (18.1%) patients with 60-day mortality, 22 (26.5%) with 90-day mortality, and 4 (4.8%) with 30-day mortality. Multivariable analysis identified only mGPS as being associated with 60-day mortality (odds ratio, 9.387; 95% confidence interval, 0.001-4.478; p = 0.049). The overall survival of patients with a mGPS score of 2 was significantly worse than that of those with a mGPS score of < 2 (p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the mGPS is a good predictor not only of 60-day mortality, but also of the overall survival of patients with late-stage cancer and MBO.