Associations between the 3D position of the mental foramen with sagittal skeletal relationships (classes I, II, and III) and vertical facial growth patterns (normal, long, and short faces) in different ages and sexes: a retrospective cohort study of 360 CBCTs.

BACKGROUND: The 3D position of the mental foramen (MF) is of significant clinical value in dental implantology and mandibular surgeries or in local anesthesia. Despite its importance, it is not clearly known how the position of MF can alter in different individuals, since the literature on the associations between the MF position with vertical growth patterns is non-existent and those on links between the MF position and skeletal malocclusions are scarce. Therefore, we aimed to investigate these, for the first time, on cone-beam computed tomographies (CBCTs). METHODS: Archival CBCTs of 9 sub-groups (i.e., 3 skeletal Classes I, II, and III × 3 vertical growth patterns 'long face, short face, normal face') were collected by evaluating patients' SNA, SNB, ANB, facial angle, lower facial height, and FMA (n = 9 × 40 = 360). Included cases were older than 17 years and without any history of orthodontic/orthognathic treatments (243 women, 117 men, mean age: 22.28 ± 2.80 years). Perpendicular distances between the MF and 3 fixed bony structures (the mandibular symphysis [S/width], the mandibular ramus [R/length], and the mandibular lower cortex [C/height]) were measured on different sectional planes on both hemimandibles. Left- and right-side measurements were combined. Data were analyzed using the 3-way ANCOVA, Bonferroni, one-way ANOVA, Tamhane, Pearson, and t-test (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Width was the smallest in Class II and greatest in Class III cases (all P values < 0.000001, Bonferroni). It was the shortest in long faces and longest in short faces (all P values ≤ 0.00008). The inferior-superior height was larger in Class III than both Classes I and II (both P values ≤ 0.003); there was no significant difference between Classes I and II in terms of height (P = 0.684). Height was the largest in long faces and smallest in short faces (all P values < 0.000001). The anterior-posterior length was the largest in Class III and smallest in Class II (all P values < 0.000001). Length was larger in short-face people versus normal- or long-face individuals (P ≤ 0.00003); nevertheless, long and normal faces did not differ in terms of length (P = 0.448). Subjects' age was not correlated with their MF positions (P ≥ 0.579, Pearson coefficient). Sex dimorphism existed only for height (P = 0.009, t-test) but not for length or width. CONCLUSIONS: The MF position may considerably differ in various horizontal or vertical growth patterns and sexes. This should be noted in mandible surgeries.

Prevalence of mandibular asymmetry in different skeletal sagittal patterns.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the prevalence of mandibular asymmetry in skeletal sagittal malocclusions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, Web of Science, Scopus, LIVIVO and gray literature (OpenGrey, ProQuest, and Google Scholar) were electronically searched. Two independent investigators selected the eligible studies, and assessed risk of bias and certainty of evidence (GRADE). One reviewer independently extracted the data and the second reviewer checked this information. Any disagreement between the reviewers in each phase was resolved by discussion between them and/or involved a third reviewer for final decision. RESULTS: Electronic search identified 5,132 studies, and 5 observational studies were included. Risk of bias was low in two studies, moderate in one, and high in two. The studies showed high heterogeneity. Mandibular asymmetry ranged from 17.43% to 72.95% in overall samples. Horizontal chin deviation showed a prevalence of 17.66% to 55.6% asymmetry in Class I malocclusions, and 68.98% in vertical asymmetry index. In Class II patients, prevalence of mandibular asymmetry varied from 10% to 25.5% in horizontal chin deviation, and 71.7% in vertical asymmetry index. The Class III sample showed a prevalence of mandibular asymmetry ranging from 22.93% to 78% in horizontal chin deviation and 80.4% in vertical asymmetry index. Patients seeking orthodontic or orthognathic surgery treatment showed greater prevalence of mandibular asymmetry. CONCLUSIONS: Skeletal Class III malocclusion showed the greatest prevalence of mandibular asymmetry. Mandibular vertical asymmetry showed a marked prevalence in all malocclusions. However, conclusions should be interpreted with caution due to use of convenience samples and low-quality study outcomes.

Retrospective epidemiological study of mandibular rotational types in patients with orthodontical malocclusion.

SUMMARY: The primary aim of this study was to illustrate the prevalence of facial skeletal discrepancy in an Italian sample. Another aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of the sagittal skeletal discrepancy classification in order to establish a morphologic pattern of growth useful for diagnosis and prediction of therapeutic results. The authors considered a sample of 732 patients (426 females and 306 males) aged between 6 and 17 years old. Cephalometric parameters were evaluated in order to establish a relationship between sagittal skeletal discrepancy and the classification of facial rotations (Lavergne and Petrovic). Facial types with neutral mandibular growth direction were the most prevalent, and were most observed in classes I and II; the latter was more represented than others in our sample. Facial types with posterior mandibular growth direction were the most prevalent in class III. Sagittal skeletal discrepancy classification is not able to establish a specific facial type or predict an individual responsiveness to treatment.

Self-esteem in adolescents with Angle Class I, II and III malocclusion in a Peruvian sample

ABSTRACT Objective: To compare self-esteem scores in 12 to 16-year-old adolescents with different Angle malocclusion types in a Peruvian sample. Material and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a sample of 276 adolescents (159, 52 and 65 with Angle Class I, II and III malocclusions, respectively) from Trujillo, Peru. Participants were asked to complete the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) and were also clinically examined, so as to have Angle malocclusion classification determined. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to compare RSES scores among adolescents with Class I, II and III malocclusions, with participants' demographic factors being controlled. Results: Mean RSES scores for adolescents with Class I, II and III malocclusions were 20.47 ± 3.96, 21.96 ± 3.27 and 21.26 ± 4.81, respectively. The ANCOVA test showed that adolescents with Class II malocclusion had a significantly higher RSES score than those with Class I malocclusion, but there were no differences between other malocclusion groups. Supplemental analysis suggested that only those with Class II, Division 2 malocclusion might have greater self-esteem when compared to adolescents with Class I malocclusion. Conclusion: This study shows that, in general, self-esteem did not vary according to adolescents' malocclusion in the sample studied. Surprisingly, only adolescents with Class II malocclusion, particularly Class II, Division 2, reported better self-esteem than those with Class I malocclusion. A more detailed analysis assessing the impact of anterior occlusal features should be conducted.

RESUMO Objetivo: comparar os escores relacionados à autoestima de adolescentes com 12 a 16 anos de idade, portadores de diferentes tipos de má oclusão de Angle, em uma amostra de peruanos. Métodos: um estudo transversal foi conduzido com uma amostra de 276 adolescentes (159, 52 e 65, respectivamente, com má oclusão de Classe I, II e III de Angle) da cidade de Trujillo, Peru. Os participantes foram instruídos a completar a Escala de Autoestima de Rosenberg (Rosenberg self-esteem scale, ou RSES), e também foram submetidos a exames clínicos para determinar qual sua má oclusão, segundo a classificação de Angle. A análise de covariância (ANCOVA) foi utilizada para comparar os escores da RSES dos adolescentes com más oclusões de Classes I, II e III, controlando-se os fatores demográficos dos participantes. Resultados: as médias dos escores da RSES dos adolescentes com Classes I, II e III foram, respectivamente: 20,47 ± 3,96, 21,96 ± 3,27 e 21,26 ± 4,81. O teste ANCOVA revelou que o escore da RSES dos adolescentes com Classe II foi significativamente maior do que o escore dos adolescentes com Classe I, mas não houve diferenças entre os outros grupos de más oclusões. Uma análise adicional sugeriu que podem ser somente os adolescentes Classe II, subdivisão 2, que apresentam autoestima mais elevada, quando comparados aos adolescentes Classe I. Conclusão: esse estudo mostrou que, no geral, a autoestima dos adolescentes incluídos na amostra estudada não variou em função da má oclusão apresentada. Inesperadamente, apenas os adolescentes com Classe II - especialmente os com Classe II, subdivisão 2 - relataram apresentar uma autoestima mais elevada do que os adolescentes com Classe I. Uma análise mais detalhada deve ser conduzida, avaliando qual característica oclusal da região anterior tem mais impacto.

Agreement evaluation of a newly proposed system for malocclusion classification / Acuerdo de evaluación de un sistema de nuevas propuestas de clasificación de la maloclusión

The current malocclusion classification systems, routinely used in orthodontic practice, still yield different disagreement values among examiners who evaluate one and the same clinical case. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the agreement effectiveness of a Newly Proposed System for malocclusion classification – in the anteroposterior orientation -, conceived by the present authors. Thirty-four examiners evaluated 15 malocclusion cases using Angle's, Katz’sand the Newly Proposed System classifications to determine which system shows the highest degree of agreement and accuracy when results were communicated among examiners. A comparison of the classifications attributed to each individual case and the mean figures found for the total data in each classification showed that the methods advanced by the Newly Proposed System yielded a higher degree of agreement (73.33 percent) than Angle’s (26.66 percent) and Katz’s (26.66 percent). The Newly Proposed System proved to be an outstanding malocclusion classification system with a high degree of agreement among examiners. On the other hand, however, further studies involving a wider sample of malocclusions and a greater number of examiners are strongly recommended if more conclusive results are to be achieved.

Los sistemas actuales de clasificación de maloclusión, habitualmente utilizados en la práctica de ortodoncia, siendo los distintos valores un desacuerdo entre los examinadores que evalúan un caso clínico y o el mismo caso. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la eficacia de un nuevo sistema propuesto para la clasificación de maloclusión - en la orientación anteroposterior -, concebida por los autores de este estudio. Treinta y cuatro examinadores evaluaron 15 casos de maloclusión utilizando las clasificaciones de Angle, Katz y el nuevo sistema propuesto de clasificación, para determinar cual de los sistemas muestran el mayor grado de acuerdo y precisión cuando los resultados fueron comunicados entre los examinadores. La comparación de las clasificaciones atribuidas a cada caso particular y las medias encontrada para los datos totales de cada clasificación mostró que los métodos avanzados del nuevo sistema propuesto dio un mayor grado de acuerdo (73,33 por ciento) que (Angle 26,66 por ciento) y Katz (26,66 por ciento). El nuevo sistema propuesto demostró ser un sistema de clasificación de la maloclusión con un alto grado de acuerdo entre los examinadores. Sin embargo, otros estudios con una muestra más amplia de maloclusiones y un mayor número de examinadores se recomienda para alcanzar resultados más concluyentes.