Diagnostic potential of endothelin-1 in peri-implant diseases: a cross-sectional study.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the potential of Endothelin-1 (ET-1), a peptide derived from vascular endothelial cells, as a biomarker for diagnosing peri-implant diseases. METHODS: A cohort of 29 patients with a total of 76 implants was included in this study and subsequently divided into three groups based on peri-implant clinical parameters and radiographic examination: healthy (peri-implant health) (n = 29), mucositis (n = 22), and peri-implantitis (n = 25) groups. The levels of ET-1 (ρg/site) and interleukin (IL)-1ß (ρg/site) in peri-implant sulcus fluid (PISF) samples were determined using enzyme immunoassay. Statistical analyses were conducted using Kruskal-Wallis and Steel-Dwass tests. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the biomarkers. RESULTS: ET-1 levels were significantly elevated in the peri-implantitis group compared to those in the healthy group, and were highest in the peri-implant mucositis group. Additionally, IL-1ß levels were significantly higher in the peri-implantitis group than those in the healthy group. ROC curve analysis indicated that ET-1 exhibited superior area under the curve values, sensitivity, and specificity compared to those of IL-1ß. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the presence of ET-1 in PISF plays a role in peri-implant diseases. Its significantly increased expression in peri-implant mucositis indicates its potential for enabling earlier and more accurate assessments of peri-implant inflammation when combined with conventional examination methods.

Bone Metabolism and Dental Implant Insertion as a Correlation Affecting on Marginal Bone Remodeling: Texture Analysis and the New Corticalization Index, Predictor of Marginal Bone Loss-3 Months of Follow-Up.

Background/Objectives: The general condition of implantology patients is crucial when considering the long- and short-term survival of dental implants. The aim of the research was to evaluate the correlation between the new corticalization index (CI) and patients' condition, and its impact on marginal bone loss (MBL) leading to implant failure, using only radiographic (RTG) images on a pixel level. Method: Bone near the dental implant neck was examined, and texture features were analyzed. Statistical analysis includes analysis of simple regression where the correlation coefficient (CC) and R2 were calculated. Detected relationships were assumed to be statistically significant when p < 0.05. Statgraphics Centurion version 18.1.12 (Stat Point Technologies, Warrenton, VA, USA) was used to conduct the statistical analyses. Results: The research revealed a correlation between MBL after 3 months and BMI, PTH, TSH, Ca2+ level in blood serum, phosphates in blood serum, and vitamin D. A correlation was also observed between CI and PTH, Ca2+ level in blood serum, vitamin D, LDL, HDL, and triglycerides on the day of surgery. After 3 months of the observation period, CI was correlated with PTH, TSH, Ca2+ level in blood serum, and triglycerides. Conclusion: The results of the research confirm that the general condition of patients corresponds with CI and MBL. A patient's general condition has an impact on bone metabolism around dental implants. Implant insertion should be considered if the general condition of the patient is not stable. However, CI has not yet been fully investigated. Further studies are necessary to check and categorize the impact of corticalization on marginal bone loss near dental implants.

Implant Failure and Marginal Bone Loss Between Axial and Tilted Implant: An Umbrella Review with Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Several anatomical and histological limitations can complicate implant placement, angulated implant positioning appeared to compensate these limitations. However several studies suggested a higher rate of marginal bone loss and implant failure regarding tilted implants in comparison with conventional implant. Therefore this umbrella review aims to summarize and analyze all the evidence available concerning marginal bone loss and implant failure between tilted and axial implants. METHODS: An electronic literature search was conducted, without any language restrictions and only systematic reviews with meta-analysis or meta-analysis studies were included. The outcomes assessed in this review were implant failure and marginal bone loss in mm. Relative risks (RRs) and the differences of the mean (MD) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) regarding implant failure and marginal bone loss respectively. RESULTS: in total 8 studies were included, based on the short-term results, a non-significant mean difference (MD=0.00; 95% Cl; -0.01-0.02; p-value = 0.75) was recorded between tilted and axial implants supporting full-arch dentures, meanwhile a significant mean difference was recorded on a 3 years and long term follow-up reached (MD= 0.08 95% Cl = 0.05-0.11; p value<0.00001)) and (MD= 0.18; 95% Cl= 0.15-0.20; p value< 0.00001) respectively, and an insignificant difference was observed between tilted and axial implants regarding implant failure (RR=1.02; 95% Cl=0.85-1.23; p value= 0.81) Conclusion: this review based on high and moderated quality studies with low risk of bias demonstrated no significant outcome was observed between tilted implants supporting full-arch or fixed partial denture and axial implants regarding implant failure.

Restoration of posterior teeth by narrow diameter implants in hyperglycemic and normoglycemic patients - 4-year results of a case-control study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the four-year clinical outcome and marginal bone loss around narrow-diameter implants in patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus type 2 (T2DM) and normo-glycemic individuals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 11 T2DM patients with a concentration of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) > 6.5% (test group) and 15 normoglycemic patients (HbA1C < 6.0%; control group), one narrow-diameter tissue level implant, placed in the posterior maxilla or mandible, was investigated. The clinical parameters probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BOP), attachment loss (CAL), recession, and papilla bleeding index (PBI) were assessed manually after 24 and 48 months of function. The paired digital periapical radiographs were analyzed regarding the change in marginal bone level (MBL) from baseline to 48 months post-op. The technical complications were recorded. RESULTS: In the T2DM group, 11 patients were available for follow-ups. The overall implant survival rate after 48 months was 100%. The differences in means for the clinical parameters and the MBL between the T2DM and normo-glycemic patients for the observation period were statistically non-significant. No technical complications were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated an encouraging clinical outcome with ND implants in patients with uncontrolled T2DM compared to non-diabetics after 48 months' post loading. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Patients with HbA1C > 6.5% may benefit from the treatment with narrow-diameter implants by avoiding complex surgical interventions with augmentation procedures. REGISTRATION NUMBER (CLINICALTRIALS.GOV): NCT04630691.

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of implant-supported fixed prostheses with cantilever extension in anterior mandible: A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to analyze the clinical and radiographic outcomes of implant-supported fixed protheses with cantilever extensions (ISFPCs) in the partially edentulous anterior mandible. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who received anterior mandible implant restoration between January 2016 and December 2021 were included. Patients with two, three, or four continuous missing teeth receiving adjacent implant supported single-unit crowns (ISSCs), ISFPCs, implant-supported fixed protheses without cantilever extensions (ISFPNs) were divided into groups: ISSC+ISSC, ISFPC, ISSC+ISFPC, three-unit ISFPN, ISFPC+ISFPC, or four-unit ISFPN, respectively. We recorded and evaluated survival rates, mechanical and biological complications, peri-implant marginal bone loss (MBL), esthetic outcomes, and patient perceptions. Statistical analysis was performed using linear mixed models (LMM). RESULTS: The study included 87 patients and 152 implants. No implant loss occurred during an average follow-up of 3.48 ± 1.85 years (range: 1-7 years). According to LMM models, prosthetic type had a statistically significant impact on MBL during follow-up periods, in favor of the ISFPC and ISFPC+ISFPC groups (0.16 ± 0.48 mm vs. 0.51 ± 0.49 mm, p = .034; 0.22 ± 0.49 mm vs. 0.60 ± 0.62 mm, p = .043, respectively). Mechanical and biological complications were relatively low and comparable. The four-unit ISFPC group had higher subjective esthetic scores compared with the ISSC+ISSC group (98.6 vs. 83.8, p < .05), and patients in the ISFPC+ISFPC group expressed greater satisfaction with cleanability than the ISFPN group (98.8 vs. 80.6). CONCLUSION: ISFPCs offer a highly predictable treatment option in the anterior mandible, characterized by high survival rates, and comparable complication rates, peri-implant bone stability and esthetics to adjacent ISSCs or ISFPNs.

Effect of vertical implant position on marginal bone loss: a randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: One of the most important factors that has influence on dental implants success rate is marginal bone loss. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of the implant's vertical position and the soft tissue's thickness on the rate of marginal bone loss of the dental implant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single-blind randomized clinical trial study, 56 implants placed in the posterior region of mandible of 33 patients (19 women, 14 men) were divided into two groups. The group of crestal (28 implants) and subcrestal (28 implants) implants, each group was divided into two sub-groups with soft tissue thickness of 2 mm and less than 2 mm (14 implants) and more than 2 mm (14 implants). The amount of marginal bone loss was measured by Scanora 5.2 program with radiographs Digital parallelism based on the effect of the vertical position of the implant, soft tissue thickness, three months after placement, and three months after loading implants (six months after implant placement). RESULTS: The results showed that marginal bone loss in subcrestal implants is significantly more than crestal implants (p-value = 0.001), and also marginal bone loss in the soft tissue thickness group of 2 mm and less is significantly more than the group of soft tissue thickness more than 2 mm (p-value < 0.001). The amount of marginal bone loss three months after implant loading was significantly higher than three months after implant placement (p-value < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The implant's vertical position and the soft tissue's thickness around the implant are effective factors in the amount of marginal bone loss. Marginal bone loss is more in subcrestal implants and in cases with less soft tissue thickness. The time factor significantly affects the amount of marginal bone loss. TRIAL REGISTRATION: this clinical trial was registered at Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials, registration number IRCT20120215009014N415, registration date 20,220,110, (https//en.irct.ir/trial/60,991).

Marginal bone loss in dental implants: A literature review of risk factors and treatment strategies for prevention.

PURPOSE: Marginal bone loss (MBL) occurs in the periapical cervical bone after dental implant placement and abutment connection. MBL may not result in peri-implantitis; however, it is always accompanied by MBL. Recent studies have demonstrated that early MBL is a predictor of peri-implantitis. In this narrative review, we aimed to provide an evidence base for recommended treatment strategies for clinicians to prevent MBL. STUDY SELECTION: We reviewed the recent literature and performed a narrative synthesis of the evidence, focusing on available systematic reviews and meta-analyses of implant marginal bone resorption. RESULTS: The available evidence indicates that certain biological, material, and technical factors can influence MBL and consequently dictate the risk of developing peri-implant disease in later years. The order of the impact of the strength of each factor is unknown. Current recommendations to prevent MBL include controlling patients' smoking and hemoglobin A1c levels to sufficiently low levels before surgery and throughout their lifetime. Regarding the material, a platform-switching, conical-connecting implant system, and an abutment with a height of at least 2 mm should be selected. Placement should be performed using techniques that ensure sufficient soft tissue (keratinized gingival width > 2 mm, supracrestal tissue height > 3 mm), and non-undersized preparations in the cortical bone should be made with connected concave abutments during primary or secondary surgery. Patients should receive supportive peri-implant therapy during maintenance. CONCLUSIONS: MBL development is multifactorial and can be reduced by considering the biological, material, and technical factors.

DIGITAL SCANS, COMPARED TO CONVENTIONAL IMPRESSIONS, MAY EXPEDITE FABRICATION TIME FOR FULL-ARCH IMPLANT-SUPPORTED PROSTHESES WHILE MAINTAINING A COMPARABLE LEVEL OF MARGINAL BONE LOSS.

ARTICLE TITLE AND BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION: Clinical outcomes of digital scans versus conventional impressions for implant-supported fixed complete arch prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. I. A., Spin-Neto, R., Sesma, N., & da Silva, E. V. F. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry (2023). SOURCE OF FUNDING: Not reported. TYPE OF STUDY/DESIGN: Systematic review with network meta-analysis of data.

New Radiological Corticalization Index as an Indicator of Implant Success Rate Depending on Prosthetic Restoration-5 Years of Follow-Up.

The new Radiological Corticalization Index (CI) is an indicator that describes bone remodeling near the dental implant's neck at the pixel level and is not visible to the naked eye. The aim of this research was to evaluate the correlation between the CI and bone remodeling using only radiographic (RTG) images. RTG samples were divided into groups depending on prosthetic restoration; the implant neck area around dental implants was examined, and texture features of the RTG images were analyzed. The study also investigated the type of prosthetic restoration and its influence as a factor on bone structure. The statistical analysis included evaluating feature distribution, comparing means (t-test) or medians (W-test), and performing a regression analysis and one-way analysis of variance or the Kruskal-Wallis test, as no normal distribution or between-group variance was indicated for the significant differences in the investigated groups. Differences or relationships were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05. The research revealed correlations between single crowns, overdenture restoration, bridge restoration, platform switching, prosthetic fracture, CI, and also marginal bone loss where p was lower than 0.05. However, the corticalization phenomenon itself has not yet been fully explored. The findings suggest that, depending on the type of prosthetic restoration, the corticalization index may correlate with marginal bone loss or not. Further research is necessary, as the index is suspected to not be homogeneous.

Immediate Implant Placement in the Aesthetic Area using Inverted Body-shift Design: A Prospective Clinical Pilot Study.

A prospective clinical pilot study was carried out to evaluate a novel macroimplant design with a 12° angled platform. The implant is placed at the center of the socket, optimizing all the alveolar bone. In addition, the prosthetic emergence should be ideal, as it is corrected and emerges through the cingulate area. Twelve patients were enrolled in an immediate implant placement procedure with immediate aesthetic rehabilitation to replace an anterior maxillary tooth, and were treated with inverted body-shift design with 12° angled neck. Only type I sockets according to the Elian classification were considered eligible for the study. There were no implant failures after one year of loading. Regarding the horizontal and vertical hard tissue changes, there was a statistically significant median overall horizontal change of -0.99 mm at 1 mm and of -0.61 mm at 3 mm. On the other hand, stability was observed at 5 mm, since the result obtained was not statistically significant. The median pink esthetic score (PES) at one year of follow-up was 11.5. This implant may be useful in the immediate tooth replacement treatment of maxillary anterior post-extraction sockets, nevertheless, comparative studies with conventional implants should be carried out.

Immediate versus early loading of immediately placed bone-level tapered dental implants with hydrophilic surface in full arch maxillary rehabilitation: A pilot randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up.

This study aimed to compare implant stabilities between the immediate and early loaded, immediately placed bone-level tapered dental implants in the maxilla and to evaluate marginal bone loss (MBL), oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL), and patient satisfaction at a 2-year follow-up. A pilot, prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial was conducted on 24 maxillary failing dentition patients. The bone-level tapered implants of 12 patients were immediately loaded with temporary restorations, while the other 12 patients did not receive any kind of temporization. Implant-supported screw-retained complete porcelain-fused-to-metal prostheses were delivered to all patients in the seventh postoperative week. The insertion torque values of implants assigned to the immediate and early loading groups were 33.0 ± 4.87 and 29.26 ± 8.31 Ncm, respectively. The dynamics of implant stability changes from implant placement up to a 2-year follow-up were similar for both groups (Penguin®, p = 0.268; Ostell®, p = 0.552), while the MBL was at submillimeter level. The cumulative implant survival rate was 91.80% for immediately loaded implants and 97.22% for early loaded implants, without significant difference (p = 0.162). The total score on the Oral Health Impact Profile questionnaire significantly decreased over time in both groups, indicating improvement in OHRQoL (p < 0.001), and the high level of patient satisfaction remained after 2 years of function regardless of a loading protocol. Both loading protocols, immediate and early, of six immediately placed bone-level tapered dental implants are an adequate treatment choice for fixed rehabilitation of the maxillary failing dentition.

Long-term survival rates of tapered self-tapping bone-level implants after immediate placement: a positional effective rationale.

BACKGROUND: Immediate implant placement has gained popularity due to its several advantages. However, immediate placement has its challenges, including concerns about primary stability and bone formation around the implant. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes of tapered, sand-blasted, and acid-etched internal submerged dental implants in various regions of the jaw bones and to provide a positional rationale for immediate implant placement. METHODS: Between 2009 and 2018, a single surgeon at Seoul National University Dental Hospital in Seoul, Korea, immediately inserted 49 dental implants with tapered bone-level design after extraction, in a total of 34 patients. The clinical outcomes were collected and evaluated, focusing on location of implant placement and marginal bone loss (MBL), with consideration of other parameters such as implant diameter and length. RESULTS: Of 49 immediately installed Luna® (Shinhung Co., Seoul, Korea) dental implants, 23 were placed in the mandible, and 26 were set in the maxilla. The mean age of patients at the time of installation was 65.91 years, ranging from 40 to 86 years. The average follow-up period was 7.43 years, with a range of 5 to 14 years. After a 5-year retrospective evaluation of tapered, sand-blasted, and acid-etched internal submerged dental implants for immediate implant placement, the cumulative survival rate was 93.88%, with 100% survival rate in the mandible and premolar region of both the maxilla and mandible. CONCLUSIONS: After a 5-year evaluation, tapered, sand-blasted, and acid-etched internal submerged dental implants demonstrated good efficacy for immediate placement in various locations within the dental arches, exhibiting effective clinical performance.

A 10-year follow-up study on clinical outcomes of dental implant rehabilitation using surgical guide.

Objectives: The surgical guide is a static computer-assisted device used for implant surgery planning and guidance. By taking an impression and referring to the patients' three-dimensional computed tomography scan of the desired implant site, a surgical guide can be created. During surgery, the surgical guide aids in achieving the designed implant placement position and direction. We examined and evaluated the long-term clinical outcomes of implant surgery using surgical guides. Materials and Methods: This study investigated a total of 15 patients with 32 implants that were placed using surgical guides from 2009 to 2011 with a mean follow-up period extended beyond 10 years. Patient demographics and implant survival rates were recorded. We analyzed marginal bone loss (MBL) by assessing the radiographs acquired at installation, three months after installation, and one month, one, two, and five years after prosthesis delivery. Results: The mean patient age was 57.33 years at implant placement. Of the 32 implants, five implants were placed in the anterior region and 27 implants were in the posterior region. Six implants failed and three of them were replaced, resulting in an 81.25% survival rate. The mean follow-up period was 10 years and nine months. Mean MBL compared to post-installation was significantly higher than at three months after installation, and one month, one, two, and five years after prosthesis delivery. Mean MBL at three months after installation, and one month, one year, and two years were significantly higher compared to the previous visit (P<0.05). However, MBL at five years after prosthesis delivery did not differ significantly compared to at two years. Conclusion: In this study, implant rehabilitation assisted by surgical guides exhibited favorable survival rates. With the limitation of the sample amount in this study, further research and more samples are required to evaluate the long-term clinical effectiveness of surgical guides.

Prospective observational cohort study of the change of the marginal bone crest in relation to the prosthetic abutment height and the peri-implant vertical mucosal thickness at implants positioned subcrestally.

AIM: To evaluate the influence on peri-implant crestal bone loss exerted by the vertical mucosal thickness and the abutment height over 12 months after placement of the restoration on subcrestal implants with change of platform, using a restoration abutment platform smaller than the implant platform. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 99 implants were rehabilitated in the maxillary and mandibular posterior regions. A total of 22 implants were rehabilitated in the maxilla and 77 implants in the mandible, using digitally designed customized abutments with Atlantis weborder software, from the commercial house Dentsply Sirona (Dentsply Sirona S.A., Barcelona, Spain), version 4.6.5, adapting the height to the vertical thickness of the mucosa. Clinical and radiographic monitoring begins during the surgical procedure of placement of the implant and ends 12 months afterwards. Crestal bone loss was evaluated through the Carestream® CS8100 3D radiographic equipment. RESULTS: In all cases, the greatest loss of marginal bone occurred between the day of surgery (Tx) and placement of the rehabilitation (To). The average bone loss between both times was greater when the abutment height and vertical mucosal thickness did not exceed 3 mm. Subsequently, bone loss slowed and stabilized at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: The minimum abutment height and the vertical mucosal thickness are factors to take into account when minimizing peri-implant marginal bone loss, the abutment height having the greatest importance according to the clinical data obtained.

Marginal changes at bone-level implants supporting dental prostheses with or without intermediate standardised abutments after 36 months: Randomised controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to evaluate the changes at marginal bone level at implants restored with screw-retained prosthesis connected directly to the implants or with an intermediate abutment, after 3-year follow-up. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-six partially edentulous patients received 72 implants. Each patient received 2 implants and a 2-4-unit screw-retained implant-prosthesis. The test group implants received a screw-retained prosthesis connected directly to the implant shoulder, the control group prosthesis were connected through a 3-mm standardised intermediate abutment. Clinical and radiological data were recorded at baseline and at 6-, 12-, and 36-month follow-up. RESULTS: At 36 months, the mean marginal bone loss was 0.13 ± 0.18 mm for the control group and 0.20 ± 0.24 for the test group, with no significant differences between groups (p > .05). Clinical variables (Probing Pocket Depth, Bleeding on Probing and Plaque Index) at 36 months also showed no significant difference between groups. Minor complications frequency was 6.7% in the control group and 5.3% in test group. None of the groups suffered from mayor complications. Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) showed a General Satisfaction mean score in the control group of 9.40 (SD 0.82) and 9.37 (SD 1.06) in the test group with no significant differences between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Bone-level implants restored with screw-retained partial prostheses with or without intermediate abutments showed similar radiographic and clinical outcomes after 3 years.

Investigating the effects of buccal bone fenestration on maxillary anterior implants: A 1- to 6-year retrospective study.

PURPOSE: To examine the effects of buccal bone fenestration on maxillary anterior implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent implant placement in the maxillary anterior region between January 2017 and December 2021 and had received final restorations 1 to 6 years prior were screened for inclusion in the present study. Propensity score matching was used to match the two-group sample size and reduce the influence of potential confounding factors. Generalised linear mixed models were employed to evaluate the correlation between buccal bone fenestration and peri-implant marginal bone loss. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients with 50 implants were included in the study, 16 of whom had buccal bone fenestration (group 1) and 26 of whom did not (group 2). No implant failures occurred, resulting in a cumulative implant survival rate of 100.0%. There was no statistically significant difference between the pink aesthetic scores for the two groups. The mean marginal bone loss was 0.44 ± 0.46 mm for group 1 and 0.33 ± 0.32 mm for group 2 (P > 0.05). Buccal bone fenestration was not the influencing factor of marginal bone loss (P > 0.05). Marginal bone loss was greater around implants used to replace canines than those inserted to replace central incisors (P < 0.05). Far less marginal bone loss occurred around immediately loaded implants than delayed implants with cover screws (P < 0.05). When there is sufficient keratinised mucosa around the implant, marginal bone loss will decrease significantly (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, buccal bone fenestration defects around dental implants cannot influence peri-implant bone loss. CONFLICT-OF-INTEREST STATEMENT: The authors report no conflicts of interest relating to this study.

Marginal bone loss in ball versus locator attachments in implant-retained overdentures: systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This systematic review compares the impact of ball and locator attachments on marginal bone loss in implant-retained overdentures in completely edentulous patients. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Following PRISMA guidelines, health science librarians completed literature searches from inception to 17 March 2023 in seven databases. There were 15,686 items exported to EndNote from Embase.com, CINAHL (EBSCO), Cochrane Library, Ovid MEDLINE-ALL, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Hand-searching added four more articles. After deduplication, 6,756 items were screened for eligibility. Twenty-nine studies were assessed by full text, of which ten studies, involving 424 subjects, were included in the review. Risk of bias assessment was conducted using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. A meta-analysis was performed to synthesize and analyze the collective data from the selected studies. RESULTS: The included studies used diverse methodologies, implant systems, and loading protocols. Most studies reported no significant difference in marginal bone loss between ball and locator attachments. The meta-analysis revealed high heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: The results of this systematic review suggest that ball and locator attachments exhibit similar performance in terms of marginal bone loss in implant-retained overdentures. However, the limited number, risk of bias, and heterogeneity of studies highlight the need for standardized research designs and larger sample sizes in future investigations to draw more definitive conclusions.

Addition of recombinant human bone morphogenic protein-2 to the graft materials improves the clinical outcomes of implants placed in grafted maxillary sinus.

Background/purpose: The long-term outcomes of implants placed in grafted sinuses using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) are unclear. This study aimed to compare 3- and 5-year implant survival rates and marginal bone loss (MBL) during functional loading. Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed 63 implants inserted after maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA) in 45 patients between January 2016 and April 2019. The outcome variables were: 1) 3- and 5-year cumulative survival rates of the implants and 2) MBL after functional loading. Other assessed variables included patient demographic information, preoperative residual bone height (RBH), surgical site, implant length and diameter, graft material, healing period before loading, prosthetic type, and opposing dentition. Results: The cumulative 3- and 5-year survival rates of the implants were 100% in the rhBMP-2 group and 95.5% and 86.4% in the non-rhBMP-2 group, respectively. The average 3- and 5-year MBL were 1.14 ± 0.67 mm, 1.30 ± 0.74 mm in the rhBMP-2 group and 1.68 ± 0.90 mm, 2.27 ± 1.29 mm in the non-rhBMP-2 group, respectively. Significant differences were observed between 3 and 5 years between the two groups. Conclusion: Addition of the rhBMP-2 to the graft materials positively affects implant placement in the grafted maxillary sinus in terms of implant survival and MBL when preoperative RBH is unfavorable.

Comparing Single Tooth Implant Placement With and Without Allogenic Soft Tissue Augmentation. A Randomized Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect of adding an allogenic soft tissue graft at time of single implant placement using a fully digital workflow for single implant placement and restoration without making either analog or digital impressions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective randomized clinical study was performed enrolling thirtynine participants requiring single tooth implant randomized into (+ graft) group which received an allogenic dermal graft at the time of implant placement (n=19), or (- graft) group (n=20). A fully digital surgical and restorative protocol was implemented. Intraoral scans were taken before implant placement (T0), at time of final crown delivery (T1) and at one-year post placement (T2). Intraoral scans were aligned using Geomagic Control X 2020 software), linear and volumetric changes in buccal tissues were measured at T0, T1 and T2. Implant survival, probing depths, and complications were recorded. Participants were asked to complete an OHIP-14 survey at T0 and T2. Marginal bone levels were measured at T0 and T2 on peri-apical x-rays. RESULTS: 39 participants completed surgery and restoration in incisor, canine, premolar and molar positions. Two early failures were recorded in central incisor positions (95% survival). Crown delivery without complication from the digital workflow (impressionless) was achieved for 36/39 of cases (92%) with implant depth control being implicated as the chief challenge. Thirtyseven participants attended the one-year follow-up visit. Both groups showed gain in buccal tissues thickness without significant differences between the two groups for both linear and volumetric measurements (P>0.05). Soft tissue grafting was associated with minimal added morbidity. The interproximal marginal bone changes recorded were -0.16mm mesial and - 0.12mm distal for the graft group and -0.01mm mesial and -0.11mm distal for the non-graft group (p=0.07 for mesial and 0.83 for distal). OHIP score was significantly reduced at T2 compared to T0 (P=0.003) for the entire cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The augmentation of alveolar mucosa on the buccal aspect of single tooth implants is associated with clinically favorable outcomes. A fully digital workflow has been validated to permit crown delivery on CAD/CAM abutments without implant impressions.

Comparing Bone Graft Success, Implant Survival Rate, and Marginal Bone Loss: A Retrospective Study on Materials and Influential Factors.

This retrospective study aimed to evaluate success rate of guided bone regeneration (GBR) bone grafting and investigate survival rate of implants, as well as degree of marginal bone loss (MBL) around implants. This study was carried out between January 2007 and December 2016 on treatment outcomes of patients with implants which used various graft materials, including autograft, allograft, and xenograft. The bone graft success rate and implant survival rate were recorded. The influence of confounding factors such as patient characteristics, bone graft properties, and implant conditions was considered. Moreover, MBL up to 3 years after implant installation was evaluated in periapical radiographs. In mean follow-up 70 months (range 3-10 years), overall success rate of bone graft (n=80) was 100% and overall survival rate of implant (n=107) was 97.2% (autograft and allograft 100%, and xenograft 92.9%, respectively; P=.03). The 3-year MBL were similar among bone grafts (autograft 0.84±0.48mm, allograft 0.73±0.42mm and xenograft 1.01±0.59mm, respectively; P=.14). Posterior mandibular location had a significant influence on implant survival (P=.003). Regarding MBL, patients aged >60 years (P=.03), patients with both diabetes and hypertension (P=.02), patients who did not receive adjunctive membrane use (P=.04), patients with <6 months of loading (P<.001) and patients with screw-retained crowns (P=.008) were significantly associated. Our data substantiated that implant rehabilitation with GBR using autograft and allograft provide the most predictable results. With xenograft, aforementioned factors should be carefully considered to enhance long-term clinical outcomes.