Basiliximab Treatment for Patients With Steroid-Refractory Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease Following Matched Sibling Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Basiliximab is an important treatment for steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (SR-aGVHD). We performed this retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of basiliximab treatment in SR-aGVHD patients following matched sibling donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (MSD-HSCT) (n = 63). Overall response rate (ORR) was 63.5% and 54% at any time and at day 28 after basiliximab treatment. Grade III-IV aGVHD before basiliximab treatment predicted a poor ORR after basiliximab treatment. The rates of virus, bacteria, and fungi infections were 54%, 23.8%, and 3.1%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 730 (range, 67-3,042) days, the 1-year probability of overall survival and disease-free survival after basiliximab treatment were 58.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 47.6%-72.2%) and 55.4% (95% CI = 44.3%-69.2%), respectively. The 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse and non-relapse mortality after basiliximab treatment were 18.9% (95% CI = 8.3%-29.5%) and 33.8% (95% CI = 21.8%-45.7%), respectively. Comorbidities burden before allo-HSCT, severity of aGVHD and liver aGVHD before basiliximab treatment showed negative influences on survival. Thus, basiliximab was safe and effective treatment for SR-aGVHD following MSD-HSCT.

Single-unit unrelated cord blood transplantation versus HLA-matched sibling transplantation in adults with advanced myelodysplastic syndrome: A registry-based study from the adult MDS working group of the Japanese society for transplantation and cellular therapy.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) remains the only potential curative therapeutic modality for advanced myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Within HCT, the advancement of cord blood transplantation (CBT) procedures has resulted in a drastic expansion of CBT as a donor source for MDS. However, data comparing matched sibling donors (MSDs) HCT with CBT for advanced MDS, which was defined as refractory anemia with an excess of blasts (RAEB)-1 and RAEB-2 according to the World Health Organization classification at the time of HCT, have not been explored. We retrospectively compared survival and other posttransplant outcomes in 999 adult patients with advanced MDS after receiving allogeneic HCT in Japan between 2011 and 2020, using either MSD (n = 331) or single-unit unrelated cord blood (UCB) (n = 668). In the multivariate analysis, there were no significant differences in overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90-1.34; P = 0.347), disease-free survival (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.84-1.23; P = 0.845), relapse (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.68-1.15; P = 0.370), or non-relapse mortality (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.87-1.50; P = 0.310) between MSD recipients and UCB recipients. UCB was significantly associated with lower neutrophil (HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.24-0.33; P < 0.001) and lower platelet (HR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.23-0.36; P < 0.001) recovery compared to MSD. UCB was significantly associated with a lower incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.44-0.75; P < 0.001) and extensive chronic GVHD (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.32-0.67; P < 0.001) compared to MSD. Similar results were observed after adjusting for differences between MSD and UCB recipients by propensity score matching analysis. Our study demonstrated that single CBT and MSD HCT had similar survival outcomes for adult patients with advanced MDS despite the lower hematopoietic recovery in CBT recipients and higher chronic GVHD in MSD recipients.

Comparison of Allogeneic Transplant Outcomes Between Matched Sibling Donors and Alternative Donors in Patients Over 50 Years of Age with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: 8/8 Allele-Matched Unrelated Donors and Unrelated Cord Blood Provide Better Leukemia-Free Survival Compared with Matched Sibling Donors During Nonremission Status.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common indication for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The increased availability of alternative donor sources has broadened donor types for older patients without HLA-matched sibling donors (MSD). It is uncertain if an MSD should be the first option for allogeneic HCT in patients with AML over 50 years of age. The objective of this study was to compare survival and other post-transplant outcomes between MSDs, 8/8 allele-matched unrelated donors (MUDs), 7/8 allele-MUDs, unrelated cord blood (UCB), and haploidentical donors for patients with AML over 50 years of age. We conducted a retrospective study to compare outcomes in 5704 patients with AML over 50 years of age and receiving allogeneic HCT between 2013 and 2021, using either MSD, 8/8 allele-MUD, 7/8 allele-MUD, UCB, or haploidentical donors in Japan. Complete remission (CR) and nonremission at HCT were analyzed separately for all analyses. In total, 3041 patients were CR, and 2663 patients were nonremission at the time of HCT. In multivariate analysis, donor type did not determine overall survival, irrespective of disease status at HCT. Leukemia-free survival (LFS) was significantly better for 8/8 allele-MUD (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64 to 0.93; P = .005) and UCB (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.88; P < .001), but not for 7/8 allele-MUD (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.19; P = .794), and haploidentical donor (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.05; P = .146) compared to the MSD group in nonremission status. However, donor type did not determine LFS among CR status. Relapse rates were significantly lower for 8/8 allele-MUD and UCB, whereas nonrelapse mortality was higher for UCB compared to the MSD group among both CR and nonremission status. Our registry-based study demonstrated that MSDs do not lead to superior survival compared to alternative donors for patients with AML over 50 years of age. Furthermore, 8/8 allele-MUDs and UCB provide better LFS compared with MSDs during nonremission status. Therefore, MSD is not necessarily the best donor option for allogeneic HCT in this population.

Bone marrow transplant: A two-decade single centre hematology experience.

Background: Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT) is a curative form of therapy for many hematological disorders in both the adult and pediatric patients. The availability of BMT in the AFMS at AHRR for the last 02 decades has been a game changer for the patients. Methods: We reviewed our BMT data since the inception of the program till Feb 2023. Results: Over 700 patients with more than 23 different types of hematological disorders have undergone this procedure 58%% patients underwent an Autologous BMT and 42% an allogenic BMT. Autologous BMT for Multiple Myeloma and Allogenic BMT for Aplastic Anemia and Acute Leukemias have been the most common indications. 73% patients were adults, and 27% patients were of the pediatric age group. The male: female ratio was 2:1. The spectrum of allogenic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT) has expanded from Matched Sibling Donor (MSD) transplants to Matched Unrelated Donor (MUD) Transplants and Haploidentical Donor Transplants. 93% of our Allogenic BMT patients underwent a MSD BMT, 1% MUD BMT and 06% Haploidentical BMT. Today no patient with a malignant hematological disorder requiring a BMT is denied the procedure due to the lack of an HLA donor due to the availability of haploidentical BMT. Conclusion: The evolution of a BMT program has a long learning curve and the expanded pool of eligible donors has led to a situation of "transplant for all". Haploidentical HSCT for nonmalignant hematological disorders is an unmet need. CART cell therapy and Cellular therapies need to be prioritized for future inclusion.

Choosing Between Older Matched Sibling Donor and Younger Matched Unrelated Donor in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Comparison of Clinical Outcomes in Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome.

The choice between an older matched sibling donor (MSD) and a younger matched unrelated donor (MUD) in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains a subject of ongoing debate. In this single-center retrospective study of 377 patients who received peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplants for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), we compared outcomes of 85 patients who received grafts from MSDs age >60 years and 292 patients who received grafts from MUDs age <30 years. Compared to recipients of MSD transplants, recipients of MUD transplants were younger and more likely to receive dual T cell depletion (TCD), a higher CD34+ cell dose, and a fresh graft. Recipients of MSD transplants were maintained on immunosuppressive therapy longer than those who received MUD grafts. We found no differences in overall survival, relapse-free survival, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free and relapse-free survival, nonrelapse mortality, relapse, engraftment, graft failure, and acute GVHD between recipients of MSD grafts and recipients of MUD grafts. We report a higher 30-day incidence, but not 1-year incidence, of bloodstream infections among recipients of MUD transplants compared to subjects who received their grafts from a MSD. The incidence of moderate-severe chronic GVHD was higher in MSD graft recipients compared with MUD graft recipients in univariate analysis, but not in multivariate analysis. Although this difference could reflect the greater use of dual TCD, known to be associated with very low rates of chronic GVHD in MUD transplant recipients, the incidence of moderate-severe chronic GVHD was no different between MSD and MUD transplant recipients following propensity score matching, suggesting that other variables could be responsible. Taken together, our data suggest that in patients with AML or MDS who receive PBSC transplants, such factors as convenience, ease of access, and costs should be considered when selecting an older MSD over a younger MUD.

Haploidentical transplants deliver equal outcomes to matched sibling transplants: a propensity score-matched analysis.

The success of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant for hematological malignancies is heavily dependent on the availability of suitable donors. Haploidentical donor (HID) and matched sibling donor (MSD) are two important donor options providing faster and easier sources of stem cells, however, due to confounding factors present in most retrospective studies, the validity of comparing outcomes between these two donor types remains uncertain. We conducted a post-hoc analysis of a prospective clinical trial (trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry; #ChiCTR-OCH-12002490; registered 22 February 2012; https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=7061 ) to compare outcomes of HID versus MSD peripheral blood stem cell-derived transplants in patients with hematologic malignancies between 2015 and 2022. All HID-receiving patients had antithymocyte globulin-based conditioning. Propensity score matching was employed to minimize potential confounding factors between the two cohorts. A total of 1060 patients were initially reviewed and then 663 patients were ultimately included in the analysis after propensity score matching. The overall survival, relapse-free survival, non-relapse mortality rate and cumulative incidence of relapse were similar between HID and MSD cohorts. Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with positive measurable residual disease in first complete remission may have better overall survival with an HID transplant. The present demonstrated that haploidentical transplants can provide outcomes comparable to conventional MSD transplants, and HID should be recommended as one of the optimal donor choices for patients with positive measurable residual disease in first complete remission.

Comparison of efficacies of haploidentical transplantation and matched sibling donor transplantation in treating T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the differences in efficacy and safety between haploidentical donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HID-HSCT) and matched sibling donor HSCT (MSD-HSCT) in patients with T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LBL). METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, we enrolled 38 patients who had undergone allogeneic HSCT at our institution between 2013 and 2021. The study participants included 28 patients who underwent HID-HSCT and 10 patients who underwent MSD-HSCT. We compared the patient characteristics and treatment effectiveness and safety between the two groups and evaluated potential prognostic variables for patients with T-LBL. RESULTS: The median follow-up durations in the HID-HSCT and MSD-HSCT groups were 23.5 (range: 4-111) and 28.5 (range: 13-56) months, respectively. All patients showed full-donor chimerism after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Except for two patients in the HID-HSCT cohort who developed poor graft function, all patients showed neutrophil and platelet engraftments after HSCT. The cumulative incidences of grades III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease were 37.5% and 28.57% in the HID-HSCT and MSD-HSCT groups, respectively (p = 0.84). The cumulative incidences of limited (34.13% vs. 28.57%, p = 0.82) and extensive (31.22% vs. 37.50%, p = 0.53) chronic graft-versus-host disease did not differ between the two cohorts. In the HID-HSCT and MSD-HSCT cohorts, the estimated 2-year overall survival rates were 70.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 54.9%-90.0%) and 56.2% (95% CI: 31.6%-100%), respectively (p = 1.00), and the estimated 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 48.5% (95% CI: 32.8%-71.6%) and 48.0% (95% CI: 24.6%-93.8%), respectively (p = 0.94). Furthermore, the Cox proportional-hazards model showed that a positive positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) status before HSCT in patients who had completed chemotherapy was an independent risk factor for PFS in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.0367). CONCLUSION: This study showed that HID-HSCT had comparable effectiveness and safety to MSD-HSCT in treating T-LBL. HID-HSCT could serve as an alternate treatment option for T-LBL in patients without an eligible identical donor. Achievement of the PET/CT-negative status before HSCT may contribute to better survival.

T Cell-Depleted Peripheral Blood versus Unmanipulated Bone Marrow in Matched Sibling Transplantation for Aplastic Anemia.

Bone marrow (BM) is the recommended stem cell source for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from matched sibling donors (MSDs) in patients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) for its superior survival and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) outcomes compared to recipients of unmanipulated peripheral blood (PB) HSCT. Nevertheless, no studies comparing BM with ex vivo T cell-depleted (TCD) PB have been reported to date. The aim of the present study was to compare the transplantation outcomes of MSD HSCT recipients with SAA using PB (with partial ex vivo TCD targeted cell dose grafts) with those of MSD HSCT recipients with SAA using unmanipulated BM. We performed a matched-pair analysis of MSD-HSCT using TCD PB in a single institution with unmanipulated BM MSD-HSCT in the United States between 2013 and 2019 reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research. We compared 23 recipients of TCD PB HSCT for SAA (cases) and 69 recipients of unmanipulated BM grafts (controls) matched for age, Karnofsky Performance Status, Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-Specific Comorbidity Index, time from diagnosis to transplantation, and recipient cytomegalovirus serostatus. We found significantly faster neutrophil and platelet recovery in the TCD PB cohort (P < .001 and P = .03, respectively), as well as a lower incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD (0% versus 17%; P = .05) and similar overall survival (96% versus 97% at 3 years; P = .8). Our study shows that TCD PB can be considered a safe source for MSD-HSCT in patients with SAA, with potential advantages in engraftment and GVHD that could challenge the standard with BM. These findings provide a basis for future research in a prospective controlled clinical trial.

Intensified conditioning regimens improved disease-free survival and engraftment after unrelated single-unit cord blood transplantation but not after matched sibling or matched unrelated donor allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

The impact of conditioning intensity on different donor groups has been unclear in allogeneic transplantation. The objective of this study was to clarify the effect of conditioning intensity on disease-free survival (DFS), relapse, non-relapse mortality (NRM), neutrophil engraftment, and graft-versus-host disease for each donor type. We retrospectively evaluated the effect of conditioning intensity on transplant outcomes for patients with acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome aged between 16 and 60 years in Japan using the transplant conditioning intensity (TCI) scoring system. A total of 8526 patients who received first allogeneic transplantation from 6/6 antigen-matched sibling donor (MSD, n = 2768), 8/8 allele-matched unrelated donor (MUD, n = 2357), and unrelated single-cord blood (UCB, n = 3401) were eligible for the analyses. Compared to conditioning with TCI score 4.0, which was corresponds to conventional myeloablative conditioning, including cyclophosphamide with total body irradiation 12 Gy or busulfan 12.8 mg, and was considered as the reference group in the multivariate analyses, intensified conditioning with TCI score ≥4.5 improved DFS (hazard ratio [HR],0.81, P < 0.001) and relapse rate (HR, 0.70, P < 0.001) but only after UCB transplants and not MSD and MUD transplants. In contrast, NRM was higher after intensified conditioning with TCI score ≥4.5 for MSD (HR, 1.39, P = 0.008) and MUD (HR, 1.47, P = 0.002) transplants but not UCB transplants (HR, 1.12, P = 0.240). Neutrophil engraftment was also significantly higher after intensified conditioning with TCI score ≥4.5 but only for UCB transplants (HR, 1.24, P < 0.001), whereas it was significantly lower after reduced-intensity conditioning with TCI score ≤3.5 for MSD transplants only (HR, 0.82, P < 0.001). These data demonstrated that an intensified conditioning regimen improved survival and engraftment rate only after a UCB transplants. Therefore, TCI scoring system could enable the optimization of conditioning intensity according to donor type, particularly in terms of survival and engraftment.

Allogeneic Transplant and Gene Therapy: Evolving Toward a Cure.

Curative therapies for sickle cell disease (SCD) include allogeneic human leukocyte antigen (HLA)- matched sibling and haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT), gene therapy, and gene editing. However, comparative trial data that might facilitate selecting one curative therapy over another are unavailable. New strategies to decrease graft rejection and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) risks are needed to expand haploidentical HCT. Myeloablative gene therapy and gene editing also has limitations. Herein, we review recent studies on curative therapies for SCD in the past 5 years.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from HLA-matched sibling donors in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A report from the Children's Cancer Hospital Egypt.

Introduction: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is widely used for high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients in their first complete remission (CR1), and for relapsed patients in second complete remission (CR2). Patients and methods: We retrospectively analyzed data for 67 children with ALL, from a cancer center in a low/middle income country, who had undergone HSCT from human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donors (MSDs) using myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimens, between 2007 and 2020, describing the survival outcome and relapse probability after achieving CR1 and CR2 and determining outcome differences in relation to indications for HSCT in patients transplanted in CR1. All patients had achieved a negative minimal residual disease prior to transplant (<0.01%). Results: Forty-six patients (68.7%) were in CR1; 25 had adverse cytogenetics, including 18 patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL (Ph-positive ALL), and 21 had poor induction response. The 5-year overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS) and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) for the whole cohort were 56.1% (95% CI, 42.8%-69.4%), 49% (95% CI, 35.7%-62.3%) and 33.5% (95% CI, 21.7%-45.8%), respectively with better EFS and CIR for CR1 transplants compared to CR2 transplants (P=0.02 and P=0.03, respectively). Patients with Ph-positive ALL had better 5-year OS, EFS and non-relapse mortality (NRM) compared with other CR1 transplants (P=0.015, P=0.009 and P=0.028, respectively). Conclusion: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from MSD for ALL in CR1 group had superior outcomes compared to CR2 group and was apparently a curable option for Ph-positive ALL without an increased risk of non-relapse mortality. Poorer survival rates and higher relapse probabilities were associated with HSCT conducted to patients who had a poor response to induction therapy or suffered a relapse.

Comparison of Outcomes of Haploidentical Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation Supported by Third-Party Cord Blood Versus Human Leukocyte Antigen-Matched Sibling Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation in Hematologic Malignancy Patients.

Recent studies have shown that haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation supported by third-party cord blood (haplo-cord-HSCT) results in rapid hematopoietic recovery, low incidences of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and relapse of hematologic malignancies. However, few reports on haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation supported by third-party cord blood (haplo-cord-PBSCT) have been published. To evaluate the outcomes of patients who underwent haplo-cord-PBSCT or human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donor peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (MSD-PBSCT), we retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of patients with hematologic malignancies who underwent haplo-cord-PBSCT (n = 93) or MSD-PBSCT (n = 72) in our hospital from March 2017 to December 2020. In the haplo-cord-PBSCT and MSD-PBSCT groups, the median time for neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 13 vs. 12 days (p = 0.07) and 16 vs. 13 days (p = 0.06), respectively. The 30-day cumulative incidences of neutrophil engraftment were 100.0% and 98.6% (p = 0.12). The 100-day cumulative incidences of platelet engraftment were 96.8% and 98.6% (p = 0.01). The 100-day cumulative incidences of grade II-IV and grade III-IV acute GVHD were 29.1% vs. 23.6% (p = 0.42) and 9.7% vs. 4.2% (p = 0.18). The cumulative incidences of total and moderate/severe chronic GVHD at 1 year were 26.5% vs. 17.4% and 8.1% vs. 4.5%, respectively, and at 3 years were 34.7% vs. 34.3% (p = 0.60) and 13.6% vs. 10.6% (p = 0.49), respectively. The cumulative incidences of relapse at 1 year were 9.3% and 7.2% and at 3 years were 17.0% and 17.0% (p = 0.98). Non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 1 year was 14.6% and 8.6% and at 3 years was 17.4% and 8.6% (p = 0.13) in two groups. The probabilities of overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS) at 1 year were 81.7% vs. 88.6%, 76.1% vs. 84.2%, and 71.7% vs. 79.7%, respectively, and at 3 years were 78.7% vs. 79.0%, 65.6% vs. 74.4%, and 55.5% vs. 63.6%, respectively, in the corresponding group, p > 0.05. In conclusion, for patients with acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome (AML/MDS) and acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL), haplo-cord-PBSCT results in similar outcomes compared with MSD-PBSCT, and it may be a valid alternative transplantation method.

Neuropsychological, behavioral, and quality-of-life outcomes in children and adolescents with sickle cell disease treated with nonmyeloablative matched sibling donor hematopoietic cell transplantation: A case series.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Despite advances in the treatment of sickle cell disease (SCD), cerebrovascular and cognitive insults can have lifelong consequences. Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is an established curative therapy, and recent studies have demonstrated efficacy with reduced toxicity nonmyeloablative (NMA) regimens, but little is known about neuropsychological outcomes. The objective of this study was to describe neuropsychological, behavioral, and quality-of-life outcomes with medical correlates in children with SCD who received an NMA matched sibling donor (MSD) HCT. DESIGN/METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis of nine recipients with hemoglobin SS SCD who underwent MSD HCT using the National Institutes of Health (NIH) NMA protocol. RESULTS: Mean full-scale intellectual functioning (FSIQ) was average pre-HCT (FSIQ = 92.1, SD 9.0; n = 8) and 2 years post-HCT (mean FSIQ = 96.6; SD 11.1; N = 9). Neuropsychological functioning was largely average across all cognitive domains, and no pre/post-HCT differences were found to be statistically significant given the small sample size. However, effect sizes revealed moderate improvements in processing speed (Cohen's d = .72) and verbal memory (Cohen's d = .60) post-HCT, and declines in measures of attention (Cohen's d = -.54) and fine motor speed and dexterity (Cohen's d = -.94). Parents endorsed better quality of life (Cohen's d = .91), less impact of SCD on their family, and less worry about their child's future (Cohen's d = 1.44). CONCLUSION: Neuropsychological functioning in a sample of children and adolescents treated uniformly with NMA MSD HCT remained stable or improved in most cognitive domains, and improvements in quality of life and family functioning were observed.

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant for Hematological Malignancies: Experience from a Tertiary Care Center in Northern India and Review of Indian Data.

Sanjeev Kumar SharmaHematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the preferred treatment for high-risk and relapsed/refractory hematological malignancies. Moreover, with the improved supportive care and increasing acceptance of haploidentical transplantations as an alternative treatment modality, more patients are opting for HSCT as a definite treatment for hematological malignancies. We report here the real-world data and outcome of HSCT done for hematological malignancies at our transplant center. Five hundred and sixteen patients underwent HSCT from August 2010 to November 2019. The most common indications for allogeneic and autologous HSCT were acute myeloid leukemia and multiple myeloma, respectively. The 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival for all transplants were 65% and 33%, respectively. Though outcome of matched sibling donor allogeneic transplant is better than haploidentical donor (HID) transplant, patients having only HID can still be considered for allogeneic HSCT for high-risk diseases. The most common cause of death was infections followed by relapse of the disease.

Mycophenolate Mofetil: A Friend or a Foe with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide and Tacrolimus Prophylaxis in HLA-Matched Donors?

Adapted from the haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) literature, post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is being used increasingly with HLA-matched donors, generally with a calcineurin inhibitor, such as tacrolimus (Tac), and with or without mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Owing to its immunosuppressive and potentially antitumor and antimicrobial properties, MMF is an attractive drug; the benefit gained when it is used with PTCy/Tac remains unclear, however. To assess this, we compared PTCy/Tac (n = 242) and PTCy/Tac/MMF (n = 144) regimens in recipients of HLA-matched donor transplantation. In multivariate analysis, the PTCy/Tac/MMF group had a significantly higher risk of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) (hazard ratio [HR], 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6 to 2.8; P < .001), and steroid-refractory/dependent aGVHD (HR, 4.8; 95% CI, 2.4 to 9.6; P < .001), yet a significantly lower risk of relapse (HR, .5; 95% CI, .3 to .9; P = .009) and better progression-free survival (PFS) (HR, .7; 95% CI, .5 to .9; P = .04). There were no differences in the risk of grade III-IV aGVHD, chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD), nonrelapse mortality, or overall survival. MMF was associated with prolonged neutrophil engraftment by 2 days and an elevated risk of bacterial infection. In an exploratory stool microbiome analysis (n = 16), we noted a higher relative abundance of ß-glucuronidase-producing bacteria in the MMF group, which may have a role in the pathogenesis of MMF-related GVHD. Our data suggest that the addition of MMF to PTCy/Tac for HLA-matched donor HCT does not provide any advantage for GVHD prevention. Further studies are needed to decipher this mechanism and understand its role with PTCy-based prophylaxis.

Haploidentical versus Matched Unrelated versus Matched Sibling Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide.

With the use of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy), the outcomes of mismatched related donor hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) are now approaching those of matched donor HCT. Here we compared haploidentical donor HCT versus HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD) HCT and HLA-identical sibling donor (MSD) HCT in a cohort in which all patients received PTCy for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. We included 661 patients (275 haploidentical, 246 MUD, and 140 MSD HCT). The most common diagnoses were acute myelogenous leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. In multivariate analysis, the haploidentical group was found to have significantly higher nonrelapse mortality (NRM) (hazard ratio [HR], 3.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2 to 4.9; P < .001) and inferior progression-free survival (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.4 to 2.4; P < .001) and overall survival (OS; HR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.6 to 3; P < .001) compared with the MUD group. Relapse was the most common cause of death in all groups. Among causes of NRM, the haploidentical group had more infection-related deaths and fewer GVHD-related deaths than the other groups. The haploidentical group also had a higher risk of viral and fungal infections, grade ≥3 hemorrhagic cystitis, and cardiovascular toxicities and slower reconstitution of CD4, CD8, and regulatory T cells but faster reconstitution of natural killer cells. In an exploratory analysis, older patients with older donors (>50 years for both) appeared to have particularly high NRM and lower OS in the haploidentical group compared with the other groups. Our data suggest that even with the use of PTCy, the outcomes of haploidentical HCT are inferior to those of HLA-matched donor HCT.

Frontline Therapy Options for Adults With Newly Diagnosed Severe Aplastic Anemia: Intensive immunosuppressive Therapy Plus Eltrombopag or Matched Sibling Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation?

Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is a life-threatening bone marrow failure disease. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from a matched sibling donor (MSD-HSCT) and intensive immunosuppressive therapy (IST) are 2 major comparable treatments for SAA. As the addition of eltrombopag (EPAG) to standard IST therapy has greatly improved the survival prognosis of SAA, whether MSD-HSCT or IST/EPAG is the better choice has become a matter of debate. A study was performed involving 99 patients with newly diagnosed acquired SAA from 5 medical centers, including 48 MSD-HSCT cases and 51 IST/EPAG cases, which consisted of rabbit antithymocyte globulin or porcine-antilymphocyte globulin, cyclosporine plus eltrombopag. The results suggested that patients treated with MSD-HSCT or IST/EPAG had similar overall survival (OS) rates exceeding 95% (P = .97). However, the event-free survival rate (EFS) of IST/EPAG (71.0%) was significantly lower than that of MSD-HSCT (89.6%), P = .04. Subgroup analysis indicated that the OS of the MSD-HSCT group was superior to that of the IST/EPAG group (100% versus 85.7%, P = .04) among those with very severe aplastic anemia (VSAA). Both the complete response rate (CR) and overall response rate (OR) with MSD-HSCT were significantly higher than those with IST/EPAG (CR: 79.2% versus 15.7%, P < .001; OR: 97.9% versus 72.6%, P = .001). In conclusion, IST/EPAG or MSD-HSCT treatment achieves an equally high OS in SAA, but MSD-HSCT leads to a better OS in patients with VSAA and shows advantages in improving EFS and accelerating hematopoietic reconstruction in patients with SAA.

[A retrospective comparative study of haplotype hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and human leukocyte antigen-matched sibling donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the treatment of acute B-lymphocyte leukemia].

Objective: To investigate whether haplotype hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) is effective in the treatment of pre transplant minimal residual disease (Pre-MRD) positive acute B lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) compared with HLA- matched sibling donor transplantation (MSDT) . Methods: A total of 998 patients with B-ALL in complete remission pre-HSCT who either received haplo-HSCT (n=788) or underwent MSDT (n=210) were retrospectively analyzed. The pre-transplantation leukemia burden was evaluated according to Pre-MRD determinedusing multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) . Results: Of these patients, 997 (99.9% ) achieved sustained, full donor chimerism. The 100-day cumulative incidences of neutrophil engraftment, platelet engraftment, and grades Ⅱ-Ⅳ acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were 99.9% (997/998) , 95.3% (951/998) , and 26.6% (95% CI 23.8% -29.4% ) , respectively. The 3-year cumulative incidence of total chronic GVHD was 49.1% (95% CI 45.7% -52.4% ) . The 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) of the 998 cases were 17.3% (95% CI 15.0% -19.7% ) and 13.8% (95% CI 11.6% -16.0% ) , respectively. The 3-year probabilities of leukemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) were 69.1% (95% CI 66.1% -72.1% ) and 73.0% (95% CI 70.2% -75.8% ) , respectively. In the total patient group, cases with positive Pre-MRD (n=282) experienced significantly higher CIR than that of subjects with negative Pre-MRD [n=716, 31.6% (95% CI 25.8% -37.5% ) vs 14.3% (95% CI 11.4% -17.2% ) , P<0.001]. For patients in the positive Pre-MRD subgroup, cases treated with haplo-HSCT (n=219) had a lower 3-year CIR than that of cases who underwent MSDT [n=63, 27.2% (95% CI 21.0% -33.4% ) vs 47.0% (95% CI 33.8% -60.2% ) , P=0.002]. The total 998 cases were classified as five subgroups, including cases with negative Pre-MRD group (n=716) , cases with Pre-MRD<0.01% group (n=46) , cases with Pre-MRD 0.01% -<0.1% group (n=117) , cases with Pre-MRD 0.1% -<1% group (n=87) , and cases with Pre-MRD≥1% group (n=32) . For subjects in the Pre-MRD<0.01% group, haplo-HSCT (n=40) had a lower CIR than that of MSDT [n=6, 10.0% (95% CI 0.4% -19.6% ) vs 32.3% (95% CI 0% -69.9% ) , P=0.017]. For patients in the Pre-MRD 0.01% -<0.1% group, haplo-HSCT (n=81) also had a lower 3-year CIR than that of MSDT [n=36, 20.4% (95% CI 10.4% -30.4% ) vs 47.0% (95% CI 29.2% -64.8% ) , P=0.004]. In the other three subgroups, the 3-year CIR was comparable between patients who underwent haplo-HSCT and those received MSDT. A subgroup analysis of patients with Pre-MRD<0.1% (n=163) was performed, the results showed that cases received haplo-HSCT (n=121) experienced lower 3-year CIR [16.0% (95% CI 9.4% -22.7% ) vs 40.5% (95% CI 25.2% -55.8% ) , P<0.001], better 3-year LFS [78.2% (95% CI 70.6% -85.8% ) vs 47.6% (95% CI 32.2% -63.0% ) , P<0.001] and OS [80.5% (95% CI 73.1% -87.9% ) vs 54.6% (95% CI 39.2% -70.0% ) , P<0.001] than those of MSDT (n=42) , but comparable in 3-year NRM [5.8% (95% CI 1.6% -10.0% ) vs 11.9% (95% CI 2.0% -21.8% ) , P=0.188]. Multivariate analysis showed that haplo-HSCT was associated with lower CIR (HR=0.248, 95% CI 0.131-0.472, P<0.001) , and superior LFS (HR=0.275, 95% CI 0.157-0.483, P<0.001) and OS (HR=0.286, 95% CI 0.159-0.513, P<0.001) . Conclusion: Haplo HSCT has a survival advantage over MSDT in the treatment of B-ALL patients with pre MRD<0.1% .

Encouraging the outcomes of children with beta-thalassaemia major who underwent fresh cord blood transplantation from an HLA-matched sibling donor.

BACKGROUND: Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is currently the only curative treatment for thalassaemia major (TM). Cord blood (CB) from a sibling has different characteristics from marrow and has potential advantages and disadvantages as a stem cell source. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 68 children with beta-thalassaemia major (ß-TM) who underwent fresh cord blood transplantation (F-CBT) from an HLA-matched sibling donor (MSD) between June 2010 and July 2018 in the Department of Pediatrics, Nanfang Hospital and Haematology-Oncology, Shenzhen Children's Hospital. RESULTS: The median infused doses of total nucleated cells (TNCs) and CD34 + cells were 8.51×107/kg and 3.16×105/kg, respectively. The median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were, respectively, 27 and 31 days. The cumulative probabilities of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were very low after F-CBT (7.8% and 0.0%, respectively). Of the 68 paediatric patients, 67 patients survived during a median follow-up period of 61 months. The estimated 5-year probability of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 98.5% and 87.9%, respectively. Three patients experienced graft rejection (GR) (4.5%), and we identified CD34 + cell dose as a significant risk factor for graft failure (p = 0.036) in stratify analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The above results indicate that patients with ß-TM have excellent outcomes after F-CBT from an HLA-MSD.

Comparison of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Outcomes Using Matched Sibling Donors, Haploidentical Donors, and Immunosuppressive Therapy for Patients With Acquired Aplastic Anemia.

We retrospectively compared the outcomes of 387 consecutive patients with acquired aplastic anemia (AA) who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with a fludarabine-based conditioning regimen from matched sibling donors (MSD) (n = 108) or haploidentical donors (HID) (n = 91) and immunosuppressive therapy (IST) (n = 188) from 2014 to 2020 at our hospital. Compared with HID-HSCT, MSD-HSCT had a lower incidence of graft failure (1% vs. 7%, p = 0.062), grade II-IV acute graft versus host disease (aGvHD) (16% vs. 35%, p = 0.001), and mild to severe chronic GvHD (cGvHD) (8% vs. 23%, p = 0.007), but an equivalent incidence of grade III-IV aGvHD (8% vs. 12%, p = 0.237) and moderate to severe cGvHD (3% vs. 9%, p = 0.076). HSCT had superior blood count recovery at 3, 6, and 12 months compared with IST (p < 0.001). The estimated 5-year overall survival (OS) of the MSD, HID, and IST groups were 86%, 72%, and 79% (p = 0.02), respectively; accordingly, the failure-free survival (FFS) rates were 85%, 68%, and 56%, respectively (p < 0.001). For patients aged ≤40 years, the OS rate was still significantly superior for MSD-HSCT receipients compared to HID-HSCT receipients (89% vs. 76%, p = 0.024) while the HID-HSCT recipients showed similar OS (76% vs. 78%, p = 0.166) but superior FFS (p = 0.047) when follow-up was longer than 14.5 months in contrast to IST. In a multivariate analysis, HID-HSCT and a conditioning regimen that included busulfan were adversely related to OS among patients who received allografts. In conclusion, MSD-HSCT was the frontline choice for patients with severe AA aged ≤40 years, while HID-HSCT was as effective as IST for patients without an MSD.