The use of intramedullary reduction techniques in the treatment of irreducible intertrochanteric femoral fractures with negative medial cortical support.

Objective: To explore the clinical efficacy of intramedullary reduction techniques for irreducible intertrochanteric femoral fractures with negative medial cortical support. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 69 patients with irreducible intertrochanteric femoral fractures with negative medial cortical support treated in the Department of Orthopedics at Jiangsu Province Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University) from July 2019 to December 2021. Patients were divided into Group A and Group B. Group A (experimental group) consisted of 36 cases with an average age of 76.2 ± 5.9 years, while Group B (control group) comprised 33 cases with an average age of 76.6 ± 6.3 years. Group A received treatment using intramedullary reduction techniques, while Group B received treatment using traditional extramedullary reduction techniques. Both groups achieved anatomic reduction of the medial cortex or slight positive support. Surgical duration, intraoperative fracture reduction time, intraoperative bleeding, intraoperative fluoroscopy time, fracture reduction quality, fracture healing, postoperative neck-shaft angle loss, femoral neck shortening, and hip joint functional recovery score (FRS) were compared between the two groups. Results: All patients were followed up for an average of 13.8 months. Group A showed superior outcomes compared to Group B in surgical duration, intraoperative fracture reduction time, intraoperative bleeding, intraoperative fluoroscopy time, fracture reduction quality, fracture healing, postoperative neck-shaft angle loss, and femoral neck shortening (P < 0.05). Hip joint function assessed by functional recovery score was better in Group A than Group B at 1 and 3 months postoperatively (P < 0.05), with no significant statistical difference at other time points (P > 0.05). Conclusion: For irreducible intertrochanteric femoral fractures with negative medial cortical support, intramedullary reduction techniques used during surgery demonstrated simplicity, significant reduction in surgical duration, decreased intraoperative bleeding, fewer amounts of intraoperative fluoroscopy, improved fracture reduction quality, and reduced surgical complexity. Further clinical research and application are warranted.

The clinical efficacy of Medial Sustain Nail(MSN) and Proximal femoral nail anti-rotation(PFNA) for fixation of medial comminuted trochanteric fractures: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

PURPOS: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of the Medial Sustain Nail (MSN) for medial comminuted trochanteric fractures fixation in comparison to Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) through a clinical study. METHODS: A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial was conducted at a single centre between July 2019 and July 2020. Fifty patients diagnosed comminuted trochanteric fractures were randomly assigned to either the MSN group (n = 25) or the PFNA group (n = 25). A total of forty-three patients were included in the final study analysis. The primary outcome measure was Short Form 36 health surgery physical component summary (SF-36 PCS) score. Secondary outcomes included the Oxford Hip Scores (OHS), weight bearing, complication relate to implant and so on. This study was not blined to surgeons, but to patients and data analysts. RESULTS: The MSN demonstrated significantly better functional outcomes as measured by SF-36 PCS and OHS at six months postoperative compared to PFNA (p < 0.05). Union of fractures in the MSN group reached 90.9% at three months after surgery, whereas the PFNA group achieved a union rate of 57.1% (p < 0.05). Furthermore, weight-bearing time of MSN group was earlier than PFNA group (p < 0.05). Additionally, complications related to implant usage were more prevalent in the PFNA group (33.3%) compared to the MSN group (4.5%) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: MSN exhibited superior quality of life outcomes compared to PFNA at six months postoperative. This indicates that MSN effectively reconstructs medial femoral support in patients with comminuted trochanteric fractures, which facilitates early weight-bearing and accelerates the recovery process. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration number: NCT01437176, Date of the trial registration:2011-9-1, Date of commencement of the study:2011-9, Date of enrolment/recruitment of the study subjects:2019-7.

[Comparison of effectiveness of three surgical methods in treatment of Pauwels type â ¢ femoral neck fracture in young and middle-aged patients].

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of three surgical methods in the treatment of Pauwels type Ⅲ femoral neck fracture in young and middle-aged patients, in order to provide reference for clinical selection of appropriate surgical methods. Methods: The clinical data of 103 patients with Pauwels type Ⅲ femoral neck fracture who met the selection criteria between June 2018 and December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The fractures were fixed with hollow screws in an inverted triangular shape (37 cases, hollow screw group), hollow screws in an inverted triangular shape combined with eccentric shaft screw (34 cases, eccentric shaft screw group), and hollow screws in an inverted triangular shape combined with medial support plate (32 cases, support plate group). There was no significant difference in age, gender, cause of injury, body mass index, time from injury to operation, side of the fracture, and Garden classification, whether they were in traction preoperatively, and other baseline data between groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, the number of fluoroscopy, the length of hospital stay, early postoperative complication and postoperative weight-bearing time of the three groups were recorded. Harris score was used to evaluate joint function at 6 and 12 months after operation, and the difference between the two time points (change value) was calculated for comparison between groups. X-ray films were reviewed to evaluate the quality of fracture reduction (Garden index) and healing, as well as the occurrence of internal fixation failure and femoral head necrosis. Results: The patients of the three groups were successfully completed. Compared with the hollow screw group and the eccentric shaft screw group, the operation time and intraoperative blood loss of the support plate group significantly increased, the number of fluoroscopy reduced, and the quality of fracture reduction was better, the differences were significant ( P<0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and the number of fluoroscopy of the hollow screw group were less than those of the eccentric shaft screw group, the differences were significant ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the length of hospital stay between groups ( P>0.05). All patients in the three groups were followed up 21-52 months, with an average follow-up time of 36.0 months, and there was no significant difference between groups ( P>0.05). The incisions of all patients healed by first intention. Imaging reexamination showed that there was no significant difference in the incidence of fracture nonunion between groups ( P>0.05). The fracture healing, partial weight-bearing, and full weight-bearing were significantly earlier in the eccentric shaft screw group and the support plate group than in the hollow screw group ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in change value of Harris score, the incidence of postoperative deep venous thrombosis and femoral head necrosis between groups ( P>0.05); however, the incidence of internal fixation failure in the support plate group and the eccentric shaft screw group was significantly lower than that in the hollow screw group ( P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative lateral thigh irritation in the support plate group was significantly lower than that in the hollow screw group ( P<0.05); there was no significant difference between the eccentric shaft screw group and the other two groups ( P>0.05). The overall incidences of postoperative complications in the eccentric shaft screw group and the support plate group were significantly lower than that in the hollow screw group ( P<0.05). Conclusion: For young and middle-aged patients with Pauwels type Ⅲ femoral neck fracture, compared with simple hollow screw fixation in an inverted triangular shape, combined with medial support plate or eccentric shaft screw internal fixation can shorten the fracture healing time, reduce the incidences of postoperative complication, more conducive to early functional exercise of the affected limb; at the same time, the operation time and blood loss of combined eccentric shaft screw internal fixation are less than those of combined medial support plate internal fixation, so the hollow screw in an inverted triangular shape combined with eccentric shaft screw fixation may be a better choice.

Characteristics and functional outcomes of varus displaced proximal humerus fractures.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare fracture characteristics and functional outcomes between patients with proximal humerus fractures with and without initial varus displacement. METHODS: A retrospective review of 325 patients with proximal humerus fractures was performed. Patients with initial varus displacement were placed in Varus cohort and were age- and sex-matched 1:1 with a second cohort presenting proximal humerus fractures without varus displacement, referred to as Fracture cohort. Varus fracture displacement was defined when the most proximal aspect of humeral head was below the most proximal aspect of greater tuberosity on initial radiographs, and the head shaft angle was <130°. RESULTS: There were 60 patients in V cohort and 60 patients in F cohort. Statistical analysis revealed that there were significant differences in initial horizontal offset (38.8 vs. 45.9 mm), initial anterior angulation angle (36.5° vs. 16.4°), postoperative head shaft angle (132.2° vs. 141.3°), last head shaft angle (122.2° vs. 138.5°), difference for head shaft angles (10.0° vs. 2.7°), postoperative horizontal offset (43.4 vs. 45.3 mm), last horizontal offset (38.4 vs. 42.8 mm), difference for offsets (4.9 vs. 2.5 mm), complications (15 vs. 7 cases), and revision surgery (7 vs. 1 case) between two cohorts. Overall satisfactory results were achieved in most patients regardless of varus displacement, pain-VAS and Constant scores in V cohort were inferior to the scores in F cohort. The cut-off value of postoperative head shaft angle for good/excellent outcomes was 135.5° using receiver operating characteristic curve analyses. CONCLUSION: Varus displaced proximal humerus fractures were accompanied by decreased horizontal offset and increased anterior angulation angle, and had a course of more varization and horizontal shortening compared with those without initial varus displacement. Patients with varus displaced fractures were associated with worse functional outcomes, and these factors might affect functional outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic, cohort study, Level III.

[Clinical study of double plate system in the treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures in the elderly].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the clinical outcomes of anteromedial combined with lateral locking plate for complex proximal humeral fractures in the eldery. METHODS: From June 2018 to October 2020, 30 patients who underwent surgical treatment for Neer grade 3 to 4 proximal humeral fractures, including 8 males and 22 females, aged from 51 to 78 years old with an average of (61.5±7.5) years old. Of them, 15 patients had fractures fixed with anteromedial combined with lateral locking plate(ALLP group), whereas 15 received internal fixation with proximal humerus locking plate only(PHLP group). The clinical data, simple shoulder test (SST), humeral head height loss, varus angle and shoulder range of motion were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: All fractures were healed. The follow-up time ranged from 12 to 24 months, with an average of(14.3±2.9) months. The operation time of ALLP group was longer than that of PHLP group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in SST score between the two groups at 1, 3 and 12 months after operation (P>0.05). In terms of radiographic measurement, there was no significant difference in humeral head height loss and varus angle between the two groups at 1 and 3 months after operation (P>0.05). At 12 months after operation, the height loss and varus angle of humeral head in ALLP group were lower than those in PHLP group (P<0.05). In shoulder range of motion, the range of forward elevation in ALLP group was larger than that in PHLP group 1 year after operation(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in external rotation between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Anteromedial combined with lateral locking plate in the treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures in the elderly can increase the stability of the medial column and obtain a good fracture prognosis. But there are also disadvantages such as longer operation time, so it should be individualized according to the fracture type of the patient.

Finite element analysis of different medial fixation strategies in double-plate osteosynthesis for AO type 33-C2 Femoral fractures.

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we evaluated the biomechanical characteristics of different locations of medial fixation strategies in double-plate osteosynthesis for fixing AO/ASIF type 33-C2 femoral fractures by means of finite element analysis. METHODS: We used 3-matic software and UG-NX software to construct AO/ASIF type 33-C2 Femoral fractures and lateral less invasive stabilization system (LISS) plates, medial plates (MPs), and medial support pads (MSPs), respectively. Then, the LISS, MP and MSP were assembled into the fracture model separately to form three fixation models: MSP+LISS, anteromedial plate (AMP+LISS), and MP+LISS. In the next procedure, we performed finite element analysis using ANSYS software after meshing the elements of the models in HyperMesh 11.0 software. Loading conditions including lateral-medial four-point bending, anterior-posterior four-point bending, axial loading, and torsional loading were applied to evaluate the biomechanical advantages among the three fixation types. We observed the peak Von Mises Stress (VMS) value, maximum displacement, bending angle in the coronal plane of the fracture, and torsional angle of the fracture to assess the degree of plate deformation and fixation stability. RESULTS: Our results showed that in both lateral-medial four-point bending and anterior-posterior four-point bending, the calculations of MP+LISS were marginally better than those of AMP+LISS. However, with the action of axial loading and torsional loading, the deformation of MP+LISS was distinctly smaller than that of AMP+LISS, and the fixation stability of MP+LISS was also prominently better. Under lateral-medial four-point bending, the VMS on the lateral plate of MSP+LISS (59.977 MPa) was approximately half of the two double-plate models. Under anterior and posterior four-point bending, the 38.209 MPa peak VMS of MSP+LISS was still superior to the other two double-plate models. Under torsional loading, the peak VMS (347.75 MPa), the maximum torsional angle of the femoral head (7.852 °), and the torsional angle of fracture (0.036 °) of MSP+LISS preceded those of the other two models. However, under axial loading, the peak VMS (76.376 MPa) and the maximum displacement (3.1798 mm) of MSP+LISS were slightly higher than those of MP+LISS. CONCLUSION: The MSP+LISS model showed better biomechanical performance than the double-plate models, which might be an effective solution for the treatment of comminuted distal femur fractures.

Clinical study of double plate system in the treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures in the elderly / 中国骨伤

OBJECTIVE@#To explore the clinical outcomes of anteromedial combined with lateral locking plate for complex proximal humeral fractures in the eldery.@*METHODS@#From June 2018 to October 2020, 30 patients who underwent surgical treatment for Neer grade 3 to 4 proximal humeral fractures, including 8 males and 22 females, aged from 51 to 78 years old with an average of (61.5±7.5) years old. Of them, 15 patients had fractures fixed with anteromedial combined with lateral locking plate(ALLP group), whereas 15 received internal fixation with proximal humerus locking plate only(PHLP group). The clinical data, simple shoulder test (SST), humeral head height loss, varus angle and shoulder range of motion were compared between the two groups.@*RESULTS@#All fractures were healed. The follow-up time ranged from 12 to 24 months, with an average of(14.3±2.9) months. The operation time of ALLP group was longer than that of PHLP group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in SST score between the two groups at 1, 3 and 12 months after operation (P>0.05). In terms of radiographic measurement, there was no significant difference in humeral head height loss and varus angle between the two groups at 1 and 3 months after operation (P>0.05). At 12 months after operation, the height loss and varus angle of humeral head in ALLP group were lower than those in PHLP group (P<0.05). In shoulder range of motion, the range of forward elevation in ALLP group was larger than that in PHLP group 1 year after operation(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in external rotation between the two groups.@*CONCLUSION@#Anteromedial combined with lateral locking plate in the treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures in the elderly can increase the stability of the medial column and obtain a good fracture prognosis. But there are also disadvantages such as longer operation time, so it should be individualized according to the fracture type of the patient.

Is the reconstruction of medial support important for revision following failed treatment of femoral trochanteric fractures? a retrospective comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Hip-preserving revision in patients with failed treatment of femoral trochanteric fracture is still a major challenge. Whether the medial support reconstruction could benefit the patients and improve the success rate of hip-preserving revision is still controversial. Hence, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical significance and prognosis of medial support reconstruction during the hip-preserving revision of failed femoral trochanteric fracture treatment. METHODS: Patients with failed femoral trochanteric fractures treatments addressed by hip-preserving revision at our hospital from January 2014 to December 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. 31 patients were included and divided into a medial support group (n = 16) and a non-medial support group (n = 15). The fracture healing rate was the primary measurement. In addition, the differences in Oxford Hip Score (OHS), quality of life, surgical trauma, and complications were also evaluated. RESULTS: The fracture healing rate (100%, 16/16 vs. 66.67%, 10/15), the OHS (42.06 ± 4.12 vs. 30.93 ± 11.56, M ± SD), and the mental component score of the 12-item Short-Form Survey (SF-12) (54.48 ± 5.38 vs. 47.90 ± 3.47, M ± SD), were significantly better and the incidence of complications [0(0/16) vs. 40%(6/15)] was significantly lower in the medial support group than the non-medial support group (p < 0.05). No significant differences in the physical component score of the SF-12, surgical trauma and reduction in collodiaphyseal angle of affected femur were observed between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The reconstruction of medial support seems important for revision following failed treatment of femoral trochanteric fractures. Due to the medial augmentation and improvement of the mechanical stability for proximal femur, the patients might benefit from fracture healing prognosis and functional.

Finite-Element Analysis of a Novel Cephalomedullary Nail for Restricted Sliding to Reduce Risk of Implant Failure in Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures.

OBJECTIVE: How to restrict sliding of cephalomedullary nail and rigid reconstruct medial support for unstable intertrochanteric fractures remains a challenge. This study aims to explore the feasibility of a novel cephalomedullary nail for restriction sliding and reconstruction of medial femoral support to prevent failure in unstable trochanteric fractures through finite element analysis. METHODS: The DICOM files of a unilateral femur spiral computed tomography (CT) scans from a elderly female were converted into STL files, and the most common clinical trochanteric fracture model with the absence of medial support, AO/OTA 31-A2.3 was simulated by removing the posterior medial femur. The model of a novel medial sustain nail (MSN-II) and a widely used nail (proximal femoral nail anti-rotation PFNA-II) were modeled according to the manufacturer-provided engineering drawing. Different loads were applied to the femoral head to simulate the postoperative weight bearing gait. The sliding distance of helical blade in femoral neck, maximum stress of femur and nail, displacement of proximal fragment were analyzed to revealing the mechanical stability of unstable trochanteric fracture stabilized by different implant. RESULTS: The sliding distance of helical blade in the femoral neck, the maximum stress on the femur and nail, the displacement of proximal fragment in MSN-II under 2100N axial load were 0.65 mm, 689 MPa, 1271 MPa, 16.84 mm respectively, while that were 1.43 mm, 720.8 MPa, 1444 MPa, 18.18 mm, respectively in PFNA-II. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05) and the stress was mainly distributed in medial distal side of nail but helical blade and the proximal aperture for the nail in MSN-II. Compared to PFNA-II, MSN-II demonstrates biomechanical merit against femur medialization, cut-out and coax varus. CONCLUSION: The sliding distance of helical blade in femoral neck, the maximum stress on the femur and nail, and the displacement of proximal fragment of MSN-II were less than those of PFNA-II in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Therefore MSN-II has better stability than PFNA-II and it may have the potential to avoid femur medialization and cut out. It might be an option in unstable trochanteric fracture because of its superiority in restricted sliding and medial support reconstruction.

Predictive Indicators for Complications of Proximal Humerus Fractures Treated with Locking Plate or Intramedullary Nail Fixation.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the best placement of calcar screws in proximal humerus fracture surgeries. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included clinical and radiographic outcomes of 98 patients treated with proximal humerus fracture surgeries between January 2017 and June 2020. Demographic data of patients were obtained from medical records. The surgical and radiographic results were also collected: operation time, blood loss, time to surgery, fibular allograft, disruption of medial region hinge, Neer classification, and recovery of medial support. Patients were allocated into two groups: the locking plate group (n = 65) and the intramedullary nail group (n = 33). In this study, we proposed new predictive indicators, named horizontal ratio (HR) and vertical ratio (VR), to quantify the placement of calcar screws in these two groups. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to display the accuracy of these indicators. Shoulder activity, visual scale analog (VAS) score, and Constant score were performed to evaluate postoperative clinical outcomes at 1 year follow-up. RESULTS: In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, only time to surgery and effective medial support were considered statistically significant factors of postoperative complications (p < 0.05). Significant differences were observed between medial support and postoperative complications both in the locking plate group and the intramedullary nail group (p < 0.05). Only the vertical ratio of locking plate (VRLP) was a statistically significant predictor of postoperative complications (p < 0.05). The area under curve was calculated to assess the predictive value of VRLP, which came to 0.84. In addition, a ROC analysis found quantifiable thresholds of the VR was 0.1713 as measures to avoid postoperative complications in the locking plate fixation. CONCLUSION: In locking plate fixation, the incidence of postoperative complications increased significantly when the VR of calcar screws greater than 0.1713, which was beneficial to surgeons to place calcar screws.

Application of a lateral intertubercular sulcus plate in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures: a finite element analysis.

BACKGROUND: Inversion deformities caused by insufficient medial support are especially common when the PHILOS locking plate is used to treat proximal humeral fractures. Using finite element analysis, we aimed to compare the biomechanical properties of a PHILOS locking plate (PLP) and a PLP combined with a lateral intertubercular sulcus plate (PLP-LSP) in the fixation of proximal humeral fractures with loss of the medial column. METHODS: After creating a three-dimensional finite element model of a proximal humeral fracture with loss of the medial column, three implant models were established. A full-screw PLP was used in Group A, a PHILOS plate lacking medial screw support and an additional steel plate (MPLP-LSP) were used in Group B, and a full-screw PLP-LSP was used in Group C. The three fixation models were applied to the proximal humeral fracture model, following which horizontal, compressive, and rotational loads were applied to the humerus model. We evaluated structural stiffness and stress distribution in the implant and compared displacement and angle changes among the three models. RESULTS: Displacement and angle changes were smallest in Group C (PLP-LSP). The implant model used in Group C also exhibited greater structural rigidity, endured less von Mises stress, and was more stable than the models used in Group A and Group B. CONCLUSION: An LSP placed at the intertubercular sulcus provides effective lateral and medial support, thereby reducing stress on the PLP and providing better stability with proximal humeral fractures.

How can medial support for proximal humeral fractures be achieved when positioning of regular calcar screws is challenging? Slotting and off-axis fixation strategies.

BACKGROUND: Achieving medial support for proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) by regular calcar screw positioning is challenging when the humeral head is small or locking plates are placed distally, as there are unable inserted calcar screws into the humeral head. We aimed to investigate the suitability of the 2 strategies, slotting calcar screw (SCS) and off-axis calcar screw (OCS), to achieve medial support for PHFs. METHODS: Regular calcar screw (RCS), SCS, OCS, and noncalcar screw (NCS) were tested via mechanical experiments and finite element analysis (FEA), using synthetic bones for biomechanical comparisons. All PHFs treated in our hospital from March 2017 to March 2019 were reviewed. The patients were divided into 3 groups based on the calcar screw fixation: RCS, SCS, and OCS. The postoperative varus collapse (neck-shaft angle changed to less than 120°) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores were recorded. RESULTS: The properties of RCS, SCS, and OCS against the torsion and varus force were superior to those of NCS, whereas the stiffness of SCS, OCS, and RCS were similar. FEA predicted lower peri-screw strains in the OCS and SCS than in the RCS, indicating a lower risk of cut-out. Patients (n = 125; 75 female, 50 male) aged 55.9 ± 13.0 years were evaluated. Compared with the RCS (5/55), varus collapse incidences were not significantly higher following SCS (0/29, P = .094) or OCS (3/41, P = .756), and neither were DASH scores (P = .867 and .736, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study is a preliminary study demonstrating that the SCS and OCS fixation strategies could be useful alternatives when regular calcar fixation is not possible using the plate at hand.

Reduction and fixation of proximal humeral fracture with severe medial instability using a small locking plate.

BACKGROUND: Currently, the reduction and support of comminuted medial cortex of humeral fracture remains a challenge, Therefore, a novel reduction and fixation technique that employs an anteromedial small locking plate was explored in this study, and its viability and the associated complications were assessed. METHODS: Fifteen cases of proximal humeral fractures with medial instability (five cases were classified as three-part and ten as four-part by Neer classification) were treated by the proposed reduction technique using an anteromedial small locking plate. Subsequently, the radiological and clinical outcomes were evaluated over an average follow-up period of 18.53 months. RESULTS: The average operation time was 108 min (range, 70-130 min), and the mean fracture union time in all patients was 12.13 weeks (range, 8-16 weeks). Complications such as infection and neurovascular injury were not observed. Postoperative X-ray showed avascular necrosis and screw penetration in one patient, while screw penetration, varus malunion, or significant reduction loss was not found in the other cases. The mean Constant score was 79.8 (range, 68-92) during the final visit. CONCLUSIONS: The use of an anteromedial small locking plate improved the reduction efficiency, reconstructed the medial support, and alleviated the occurrence of complications in proximal humeral fractures with medial instability.

Biomechanical study of Proximal humeral fracture fixation: Locking plate with medial support screw vs. locking plate with intramedullary fibular graft.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical properties of two different fixation constructs in varus collapse proximal humerus fracture, locking plate with medial support screw and locking plate with intramedullary fibular graft. METHODS: We used 8 pairs of undamaged fresh-frozen humen cadaveric humeri and fibula from patients ranging in age from 62 to 81 years. We simulated a proximal humerus fracture with medial comminution using wedge shaped osteotomy. One group was fixed with locking plate with medial support screws, the other group with locking plate with intramedullary fibular graft. Biomechanical test was carried out using servohydraulic material testing system. We measured displacement of specimens under cyclic load test, maximum failure load, initial stiffness, and mode of failure under increasing load test. FINDINGS: Under cyclic loading, the displacement of the specimen was significantly less in the locking plate with fibular strut graft group than in the locking plate with medial support screws group. (p = 0.012) Under increasing load test, the Locking plate with fibular strut graft group showed higher values in both maximum failure load and initial stiffness than the Locking plate with medial support screws group, and this was statistically significant. (p = 0.012, p = 0.001). INTERPRETATION: In biomechanical study, the locking plate with fibular strut graft showed significantly better results in all of the maximum failure load, initial stiffness, and gap depletion compared to the locking plate with medial support screws. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Stable osteosynthesis of cage in cage technique for surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of a displaced proximal humeral fracture is still a matter of controversy. The purpose of this study was to report outcomes at a long-term follow-up after fixation augmentation using peek (polyether-ether-ketone) cage and locking compression plate (LCP). METHODS: A total of 27 patients (average age 53.8 years, range 19-86 years) were treated with peek cage and LCP. All of them had a minimum radiographic and clinical follow-up of 1 years. Outcomes were assessed using the Constant-Murley score (CMS), disability of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score. Complications were also recorded during follow-up. RESULTS: The average follow-up was 28 months (range 12-48 months). The mean functional outcomes were as follows: CMS, 73.3 (range 61-86); DASH, 45.9 (range 27-68). A total of 4 patients had complications: osteonecrosis developed in one patient, loss of reduction was observed in 1 patient and stiffness was occurred in two patients. CONCLUSION: The use of peek cage and LCP has been a valuable option in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures. The complication rate was acceptable. Suitable void filler in the proximal humerus for reconstructing the medial column integrity attains mechanical stability in reducing the incidence of the complications.

[Research progress on medial support augmentation of plate osteosynthesis for proximal humeral fractures].

OBJECTIVE: To review the literature about the clinical application and research progress on medial support augmentation of plate osteosynthesis for proximal humeral fractures, and to provide reference for clinical treatment. METHODS: The literature concerning medial support augmentation of plate osteosynthesis for proximal humeral fractures in recent years was extensively reviewed, as well as the biomechanical benefit and clinical advantage were analyzed thoroughly. RESULTS: Medial support augmentation of plate osteosynthesis for proximal humeral fractures is very important, especially in osteoporotic and/or comminuted fractures. Many medial support augmentation methods have been proposed which can be divided into extramedullary support and intramedullary support. It can also be divided into autogenous bone support and allogenic bone support according to the material and source, divided into medial column support, calcar support, and humeral head support according to the support site, and divided into fibular shaft support, femoral head support, anatomic fibula support according to the shape of the augmented fixation. At present, clinical and biomechanical researches show that medial support augmentation is an effective treatment for proximal humeral fractures. CONCLUSION: As an important treatment strategy for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures, the medial support augmentation of plate osteosynthesis gets the focus from the biomechanical studies and clinical treatment. However, there are still widespread controversies among orthopedic surgeons regarding the support mode, site, implant shape, and material of medial column support for augmentation of proximal humeral fractures. More high-quality clinical trials and biomechanical researches as well as multi-disciplinary integration, are needed to provide better strategy treatment for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures.

Cancellous bone allograft is comparable to fibular strut allograft for augmentation in three- or four-part proximal humeral fractures.

BACKGROUND: Bone grafts have been used for augmentation and improving stability of reduced fractures in proximal humeral fractures. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical and radiological outcomes after the use of cancellous bone allografts (CAs) for augmentation in 3- or 4-part proximal humeral fractures, and compare with fibular strut allografts (FAs). METHODS: Between November 2016 and February 2018, 55 patients, followed for at least 1 year, with 3- or 4-part proximal humeral fractures fixed with locking plates were included and grouped according to the type of allograft bone used for augmentation. In this retrospective analysis, we assessed and compared the clinical and radiological outcomes of the 2 groups, using the visual analog scale score, the Constant-Murley score (CMS), the disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score, the range of movement, neck-shaft angle (NSA), humeral head height (HHH), and the changes of NSA and HHH, as well as recording any complications. The repeatedly measured clinical and radiological outcomes were analyzed by linear mixed models. The differences in outcomes between groups at the final follow-up were compared using Student's t test. RESULTS: There were 28 patients in the CA group and 27 patients in the FA group with an average follow-up of 14.5 months. The mean age of all patients was 64 (36-86). Nonsignificant group effects were observed on CMS (ß = -8.792, P = .216), DASH (ß = 1.329, P = .094), NSA (ß = 1.432, P = .752), and HHH (ß = 1.660, P = .628). At the final follow-up, the patients in the CA group showed no significant differences in visual analog scale (1.8 vs. 2.2, P = .276), CMS (81.5 vs. 75.4, P = .072), and DASH (11.0 vs. 13.5, P = .235) scores compared with the FA group. There were no significant differences in the change of NSA (6 vs. 4, P = .387) or HHH (1 vs. 2, P = .261). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with 3- or 4-part proximal humeral fractures treated with locking plates combined with CAs have good clinical and radiographic outcomes, similar to those treated with FAs.

[Biomechanical study on the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of A3.3 type with medial sustainable nail and proximal femoral anti-rotation nail].

OBJECTIVE: A3 intertrochanteric fracture is an extremely unstable fracture, which is often treated with intramedullary nail, but the implant failure is common due to the posterior medial fragment cannot be reconstructed. A new medial sustainable nail (MSN-Ⅱ) which can reconstruct the femoral medial support by sustainable screw was introduced in this study. The mechanical effect was verified by biomechanical experiment. METHODS: The loss medial support model of intertrochanteric fracture (A3) was made by artificial Sawbones model, fixed with MSN-Ⅱ and PFNA-Ⅱ, underwent axial loading and axial failure tests. The axial stiffness, yield load, displacement of head-neck fragment and torsional angle of fracture site of these nails were recorded and compared for biomechanical differences. The effect of early reconstruction of medial support with MSN-Ⅱ was determined. RESULTS: The axial stiffness, yield load, the displacement of head and neck fragment when the axial load was 1 800 N and torsional angle of the fracture site after the axial failure test of MSN-Ⅱ were (222.76 ±62.46) N /mm, (4 241.71 ±847.42) N, (11.51 ±0.62) mm, (1.71 ±0.10)° respectively, while the PFNA -Ⅱ was (184.58±40.59) N /mm, (3 058.76±379.63) N, (16.15±1.36) mm, (2.52±0.26)°respectively. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The axial stiffness of MSN-Ⅱ is better than that of PFNA-Ⅱ. The MSN-Ⅱ can bear more loads when fixed A3.3 intertrochanteric fracture and has greater axial and rotational stability. It is an effective means to reconstruct the medial support of A3 intertrochanteric fracture.

The plate fixation strategy of complex proximal humeral fractures.

PURPOSE: For complex proximal humeral fractures, severe displacement and comminuted fragments lead to poor clinical outcomes. Despite considerable management, the locking plate fixation is still a preference and the proper selection of its strategy for each individual seems to be essential. METHOD: The available classification system of the fracture, determination of surgical intervention, the common complications and related causes, and the latest critical surgical strategies with locking plate fixation were discussed in this review. RESULTS: The frequent complications with complex proximal humeral fractures after operative treatment present a great challenge to orthopedic surgeons. In order to maintain the stability of locking plate fixation, several options including calcar screw, bone graft, bone cement augmentation, dual plate fixation, and fracture impaction were available for restoration of medial support. CONCLUSION: Restoration of medial support seems of importance to provide solid stability and reduced complication for the complex fractures with fixation of locking plates.

Mechanical stability of medial support nail in treatment of severe osteoporotic intertrochanteric fracture / 中国组织工程研究

BACKGROUND: The medial support nail restored the triangular stable structure of the proximal femur through the reconstruction of the medial femoral support. The early finite element analysis and biomechanics showed that the stability of the nail was better than that of the commonly used proximal femoral nail antirotation, but the specific performance in the model of severe osteoporosis was unknown. OBJECTIVE: To compare the biomechanical differences between medial support nail and proximal femoral nail antirotation in the treatment of severe osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures without medical support. METHODS: The medial unsupported intertrochanteric fracture model was made of artificial bone with severe osteoporosis. Axial and torsional failure experiments were conducted after the medial support nail and the proximal femoral nail antirotation were respectively fixed, and the axial stiffness and torsional stiffness of the two under axial and torsional loads were recorded. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) Axial failure experiment showed that the ultimate load yield load and axial stiffness of the medial support nail group were all greater than those of the proximal femoral nail antirotation group, but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). (2) The torsional failure experiment showed that the torsional stiffness of the medial support nail group was higher than that of the proximal femoral nail antirotation group (P > 0.05). (3) The findings confirmed that the mechanical stability of the medial support nail, especially torsion resistance, is better than that of the proximal femoral nail antirotation, which may be a good choice for the treatment of severe osteoporotic intertrochanteric fracture.