Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 28(4): 884-891, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33779371

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to implement pharmaceutical care using the therapeutic outcome monitoring (TOM) method for pharmacotherapeutic follow-up of oncological patients. This was a prospective longitudinal study involving patients undergoing oral chemotherapy. The study environment was an outpatient pharmacy at a tertiary-level oncology hospital. Ninety patients who received oral chemotherapy were evaluated, and 27 patients were followed up in accordance with the exclusion criteria and acceptability of participation in the study. The patients were predominantly diagnosed with gynecological tumors, with a mean age of 57.56 ± 13.06. The average consumption of drugs per patient was 4.63 ± 4.85, and more than 55% of patients had undergone oral antineoplastic therapy for more than a year. The main therapeutic groups used were drugs that acted on the gastrointestinal tract and metabolism (34%). All patients had at least one drug-related problem (DRP). In total, 133 DRP were identified. Approximately 33% of patients had DRPs related to antineoplastic therapy; non-adherence, incorrect administration, and the probability of adverse events were among the frequently reported DRPs. We identified 43 negative outcomes associated with medication (NOM), with untreated health problems (47%) and non-quantitative insecurity (30%) being the most frequently reported. 81 pharmaceutical interventions were performed, and 96% were accepted. The main errors avoided with the interventions were untreated health problems, misuse, and interruptions associated with medication administration. The TOM method effectively achieved the desired results of therapy, improving the use of medicines, and thus increasing patient safety.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Neoplasms , Pharmaceutical Services , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/drug therapy , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
2.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr ; 93: 104283, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33227533

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To identify drug interactions of potentially inappropriate medications and mental and behavioral disorders, according to explicit potentially inappropriate medications criteria-based tools. METHODOLOGY: A systematic scoping review was conducted in February 2020. Study characteristics, potentially inappropriate medications, drug interactions, rationale, and therapeutic management proposed were extracted. The commercialization and potentially inappropriate medications standard as essential in Brazil and in the world were identified. Therapeutic management was proposed for the most cited potentially inappropriate medications. RESULTS: 36 tools including 151 drug interactions, in addition to 132 potentially inappropriate medications with concerns related to six mental and behavioral disorders were identified. Cognitive impairment and dementia were the most frequently disorders reported and antipsychotics, anticholinergics, and benzodiazepines were the pharmacological classes more involved in the drug interactions. Despite the tools recommended risperidone and quetiapine when the use of antipsychotics were inevitable; levodopa + carbidopa for Parkinson's disease; and short and intermediate half-life benzodiazepines; the quality of the evidence needs to be assessed. In this review, sleep hygiene; deprescription; medication review; and clinical monitoring of adverse drug reactions are strongly recommended. In addition, to consider agomelatine, bupropion, moclobemide and melatonin as potential safer options for benzodiazepines. CONCLUSION: Knowing the clinical conditions or risk morbidities associated with the use of potentially inappropriate medications and management of these medications for safer therapeutic equivalents or non-pharmacotherapeutic alternatives are relevant for patient safety.


Subject(s)
Inappropriate Prescribing , Mental Disorders , Aged , Brazil , Drug Interactions , Humans , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Potentially Inappropriate Medication List
3.
Rev. Paul. Pediatr. (Ed. Port., Online) ; 37(1): 27-33, Jan.-Mar. 2019. tab, graf
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-985138

ABSTRACT

RESUMO Objetivo: Verificar o perfil e a adequabilidade do uso de antibacterianos em crianças hospitalizadas. Métodos: Estudo transversal. Foi feita a análise de todas as crianças que utilizaram antibacterianos durante a internação de janeiro a dezembro de 2015, em um hospital filantrópico de direito privado de grande porte no sul do Brasil. As informações foram obtidas por revisão dos prontuários e incluíram dados demográficos (idade, sexo, raça e peso corporal) e clínicos (motivo da internação, uso deantibacterianos e desfecho clínico). Utilizou-se estatística descritiva. Resultados: Dos 318 pacientes incluídos, 61,3% eram do sexo masculino. A faixa etária variou de 2 a 11 anos (média: 5,8±2,9 anos de idade). A prevalência do uso de antibacterianos foi de 24,4% considerando o total de 1.346 crianças que foram hospitalizadas. O tempo de internação apresentou mediana de quatro dias. O principal motivo de internação foi clínico e o antibacteriano mais prescrito foi a cefazolina, sendo a via intravenosa predominante. Em relação ao uso de antibacterianos, 62,2% apresentaram prescrições de antibacterianos consideradas adequadas. A subdosagem e a superdosagem tiveram, respectivamente, os valores de 11,7 e 14,6% dos pacientes incluídos. Quanto aos intervalos de administração, 8% foram caracterizados com intervalos longos e 3,5%, curtos. Conclusões: Apesar de a prevalência encontrada do uso de antibacterianos nas crianças hospitalizadas não ser tão elevada, parte considerável da amostra apresentou inadequabilidade quanto ao uso desse tipo de medicamento, se considerados a dose e o intervalo de utilização. Esses dados são motivo de preocupação para o desenvolvimento de resistência bacteriana e ocorrência de reações adversas.


ABSTRACT Objective: To examine the profile and appropriate use of antibiotics among hospitalized children. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with children who had taken antibiotics during hospitalization in a private philanthropic hospital in Southern Brazil, from January to December 2015. The data were obtained by reviewing medical records, encompassing demographic data (age, gender, ethnicity, and body weight) and clinical data (causes of hospitalization, use of antibiotics, and clinical outcome). Descriptive statistics was used to present the data. Results: Of the 318 participants included in the study, 61.3% were male patients. The age range varied between 2 and 11 years, with mean age of 5.8±2.9 years. The prevalence of antibiotics was 24.4% out of the 1,346 hospitalized children. Median hospital stay was four days. The main cause of hospitalization was clinical instability, and the most commonly prescribed antibiotics was Cefazolin, mostly administered intravenously. Regarding the administration of antibiotics, 62.2% were adequately prescribed, even though underdose was 11.7%, and overdose was 14.6% in the studied patients. Antibiotic administration intervals were characterized as long in 8% of cases, and short in 3.5% of cases. Conclusions: Although the prevalence of antibiotics among hospitalized children was not that high, a considerable part of the sample presented inadequacy regarding the dosage and range of use. These data raise concerns about bacterial resistance and adverse reactions.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Medical Records, Problem-Oriented/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Brazil/epidemiology , Child, Hospitalized/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/classification , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects
4.
Braz. j. pharm. sci ; 52(1): 143-150, Jan.-Mar. 2016. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-789090

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT One of the current barriers proposed to avoid possible medication errors, and consequently harm to patients, is the medication reconciliation, a process in which drugs used by patients prior to hospitalization can be compared with those prescribed in the hospital. This study describes the results of a pharmacist based reconciliation conducted during six months in clinical units of a university hospital. Fourteen patients (23.33%) had some kind of problem related to medicine. The majority (80%) of medication errors were due to medication omission. Pharmaceutical interventions acceptance level was 90%. The results suggest that pharmacists based reconciliation can have a relevant role in preventing medication errors and adverse events. Moreover, the detailed interview, conducted by the pharmacist, is able to rescue important information regarding the use of drugs, allowing to avoid medications errors and patient injury.


RESUMO Uma das barreiras propostas para se evitar possíveis erros relacionados a medicamentos e, consequentemente, que danos acometam o paciente, é a reconciliação medicamentosa no ato da internação, processo no qual se comparam os medicamentos usados pelos pacientes previamente à internação com os prescritos no âmbito hospitalar. Este trabalho descreve os resultados de seis meses de um processo de reconciliação conduzido por farmacêutico em unidades clínicas de um hospital universitário. Quatorze pacientes (23.33%) tiveram algum tipo de problema relacionado ao uso de medicamentos. A maioria dos erros envolvendo medicamentos (80%) estava relacionada à omissão de medicamentos. As intervenções farmacêuticas tiveram 90% de aceitação pelos médicos. Os resultados sugerem que a atuação de farmacêuticos na reconciliação medicamentosa pode desempenhar papel relevante na prevenção de erros de medicamentos e eventos adversos. Além disso, a entrevista detalhada conduzida por um farmacêutico se mostrou capaz de resgatar informações importantes sobre o uso dos medicamentos, permitindo evitar erros e danos ao paciente.


Subject(s)
Pharmaceutical Preparations , Inappropriate Prescribing/adverse effects , Medication Reconciliation/methods , Patients/classification , Pharmacists/classification
5.
CES med ; 28(2): 307-312, jul.-dic. 2014.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-751159

ABSTRACT

Los errores con medicamentos son una de las causas más frecuentes de fallas en la atención del paciente durante una estancia hospitalaria. Su frecuencia puede ser mayor en los ambientes quirúrgicos por ser escenarios con gran dinamismo y complejidad. Este tipo de errores puede llevar a un aumento de la morbilidad e incluso secuelas o consecuencias fatales, y, a su vez, a un aumento en la estancia hospitalaria y costos de la atención. En anestesiología este tipo de errores tienen mayor impacto, ya que los medicamentos empleados tales como opioides y bloqueadores neuromusculares y las rutas intravenosas o neuroaxiales llevan a efectos rápidos o deletéreos en caso de error. Las estrategias de prevención y el desarrollo de la cultura de la notificación de los eventos son los pilares para evitar este tipo de errores. Reconocer las causas de los errores en la administración de los medicamentos y la implementación de estrategias de seguridad antes, durante y después de este proceso se reflejará en una aumento significativo en la calidad de la atención de los pacientes.


Medication errors are one of the most common causes of care failure in hospital stays, the frequency may be higher in surgical environments by being dynamic and complex scenarios. These errors can lead to an increased morbidity, or even fatal consequences, and in turn to increased hospital stay and costs of care. In anesthesiology, such errors have a greater impact because the drugs used, such as opioids and neuromuscular blockers, and intravenous or neuraxial routes lead to rapid and/or deleterious effects in case of error. Prevention strategies and the development of the culture of the notification of events are the mainstay to avoid such errors. Recognizing the causes of errors in drug administration and the implementation of security strategies before, during and after this process will be reflected in a significant increase in the quality of patient care.

6.
Nursing (Ed. bras., Impr.) ; 14(163): 650-655, dez. 2011. ilus
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, BDENF - Nursing | ID: lil-614057

ABSTRACT

Identificar na literatura os tipos e fatores de risco na ocorrência do erro de medicamentos e propor medidas que minimizem e/ou previnam a ocorrência. Revisão de literatura realizada na LILACS/MEDLINE, selecionando artigos adequados ao tema, disponível, gratuito e período de publicação (2000-2010). Existem diversos erros de medicação, como: via, paciente, dose, horário, omissão; os quais são causados por fatores individuais e do sistema. Diante dos diversos erros de medicação devem ser implementadas estratégias que conduzam a segurança do paciente.


Subject(s)
Humans , Nursing Care , Medication Errors/prevention & control , Risk Factors , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL