Mesenteric approach in pancreas-preserving partial duodenectomy for aortic graft-duodenal fistula: a case report.

An aortic graft-duodenal fistula commonly requires graft replacement and duodenectomy. However, the appropriate surgical approach to the duodenum with aortic graft fistula remains unclear. Herein, we describe the case of an 85-year-old male patient who underwent a pancreas-preserving partial duodenectomy using the mesenteric approach for aortic graft-duodenal fistula. The patient presented with hemorrhagic shock and duodenal bleeding 2 years after undergoing open aortic graft replacement. He first underwent emergent endovascular aortic repair with an artificial vascular graft to achieve hemostasis. Although his general condition stabilized following endovascular treatment, duodenal endoscopy revealed an aortic graft-duodenal fistula, exposing the artificial vascular graft via the third portion of the duodenum. As the radical treatment for aortic graft-duodenal fistula, open graft replacement and pancreas-preserving partial duodenectomy were performed using the mesenteric approach which helps to divide the pancreas and duodenum. The patient recovered without any major complications, such as postoperative pancreatic fistula, and was discharged. In conclusion, the mesenteric approach in partial duodenectomy for aortic graft-duodenal fistula could be safely performed. This procedure is useful to approach the duodenum fixed by fistula formation, which may help reduce intraoperative blood loss, operative time, and surgical invasiveness.

Isolated pancreatectomy using mesenteric approach.

In 1981, we developed the first antithrombogenic bypass catheter for the portal system. This catheter-bypass procedure relieved the time limitation caused by portal occlusion and facilitated safe and easy resection and reconstruction of the portal vein or hepatic artery. We thereafter explored isolated pancreatoduodenectomy, in which pancreatoduodenectomy is performed under non-touch isolation techniques. It is difficult to perform isolated pancreatoduodenectomy because of the complex arterial anatomy of the peripancreatic head region. In 1992, a mesenteric approach was developed for pancreatoduodenectomy. This approach allows dissection from the non-cancerous side and determination of both cancer-free margins and resectability followed by systematic lymphadenectomy around the superior mesenteric artery. This approach also enables early ligation of the inferior pancreatoduodenal artery and dorsal pancreatic artery branches from the superior mesenteric artery, as well as complete excision of the total mesopancreas (which is thought to be the second portion of the pancreatic head nerve plexus). Through this development of the mesenteric approach and antithrombogenic catheter-bypass procedure, our isolated pancreatoduodenectomy was finally established in 1992. This is the ideal surgery for pancreatic head cancer from both surgical and oncological aspects. We herein introduce the precise surgical techniques.

Controlling the arterial supply into the pancreatic head region as a whole peripancreatic arterial arcade via a mesenteric approach during isolated pancreatoduodenectomy.

PURPOSE: The peripancreatic arterial system forms various arterial arcades and collateral branches; therefore, it stands to reason that the arterial supply into the pancreatic head region should be controlled as a whole peripancreatic arterial arcade rather than as the three major supplying arteries during isolated pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). We investigated the clinical importance of early control of the whole peripancreatic arterial arcade during PD. METHODS: The subjects of this retrospective study were 63 consecutive patients who underwent PD via a mesenteric approach at our hospital between October, 2014 and February, 2017. The patients were divided into an early control group (n = 27) and a late control group (n = 36) for comparative analysis. RESULTS: The peripancreatic arterial arcades and collateral branches were seen on preoperative multidetector row computed tomography (CT) images and during PD in all 63 patients. The early control group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss than the late control group. Early control of the whole peripancreatic arterial arcade was an independent factor associated with lower intraoperative blood loss in the multivariable analysis (P = 0.012). CONCLUSION: The arterial supply into the pancreatic head region should be controlled as a whole peripancreatic arterial arcade rather than as the three major supplying arteries during isolated PD.

Treatment of Advanced Pancreatic Body and Tail Cancer by En Bloc Distal Pancreatectomy with Transverse Mesocolon Resection Using a Mesenteric Approach.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic body and tail cancer easily invades retroperitoneal tissue, including the transverse mesocolon. It is difficult to ensure a dissected peripancreatic margin with standard distal pancreatectomy for advanced pancreatic body and tail cancer. Thus, we developed a novel surgical procedure to ensure dissection of the peripancreatic margin. This involved performing dissection deeper than the fusion fascia of Toldt and further extensive en bloc resection of the root of the transverse mesocolon. We performed distal pancreatectomy with transverse mesocolon resection (DP-TCR) using a mesenteric approach and achieved good outcomes. METHODS: There are two main considerations for surgical procedures using a mesenteric approach: 1) dissection deeper than the fusion fascia of Toldt (securing the vertical margin) and 2) modular resection of the pancreatic body and tail, with the root of the transverse mesocolon and adjacent organs in a horizontal direction (ensuring the caudal margin). RESULTS: From 2017 to 2019, we performed DP-TCR using a mesenteric approach for six patients with advanced pancreatic body and tail cancer. Histopathological radical surgery was possible in all patients who underwent DP-TCR. No Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa or worse perioperative complications were observed in any patient. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that DP-TCR is useful as a radical surgery for advanced pancreatic body and tail cancer with extrapancreatic invasion.

History of pancreatic surgery in Japan: Respect to the Japanese pioneers of pancreatic surgery.

The first report of pancreatoduodenectomy was the abstract of Japan Surgical Society in 1946 by Kuru, followed by a publication by Yoshioka (Geka, 1950). The first report of total pancreatectomy was done by Honjo in 1950 (Shujutsu). Thus, the history of pancreatic surgery in Japan dawned in the 1950s. From 1970 to 1980, the American surgeon Fortner had reported the drastic concept of regional pancreatectomy with extensive dissection of vessels and connective tissues around the pancreas. A lot of Japanese surgeons were influenced by this concept and attempted to perform the extensive surgery of pancreatic cancer, especially the Japanese pioneers who had investigated the clinical benefits of extensive surgery with dissection of nerve plexus and lymph nodes around the superior mesenteric artery. Then, Japanese surgeons had a great attention for limited resection of the pancreas for borderline malignancies, and Japan was the number one country for pancreatic surgery for all pancreatic diseases, from advanced pancreatic cancer to borderline malignancies. The next step for these pioneers was how to reduce morbidities after pancreatic surgery, especially pancreatoduodenectomy. Due to the effects of technical development, drain management, and nutritional consideration, the incidences of pancreatic fistula and delayed gastric emptying decreased dramatically in the past 10 years. Moreover, the development of chemotherapeutic drugs has provided a new era of conversion surgery, similar to esophageal surgery, and one should pay great attention to more aggressive surgery, including distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection (DP-CAR). Thus, we have to inherit the passion and mentality of the Japanese pioneers of pancreatic surgery and develop safer and more secure surgical techniques to reduce the morbidities and elongate the survival of pancreatic cancer patients.

A technique for taping inferior vena cava caudal to the duodenum: duodenal penetration by IVC filter strut after retroperitoneal lymph node dissection-usefulness of the mesenteric approach.

BACKGROUND: Although an inferior vena cava (IVC) filter is used for preventing pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) in patients with deep vein thrombosis, IVC filter penetration in the duodenum is a rare complication. CASE PRESENTATION: A 35-year-old man had previously undergone retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) for testicular cancer and IVC filter placement for prevention of PTE. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) for his epigastric pain revealed penetration of the IVC filter in the duodenum. The IVC filter was retrieved through cavotomy, and the duodenal penetration was repaired using EGD clipping. Although it was difficult to mobilize the duodenum due to adhesion resulting from RPLND, the use of a mesenteric approach enabled encircling of the IVC caudal to the duodenum. The mesenteric approach is useful and safe for taping the IVC caudal to the duodenum in cases where it is difficult to mobilize the duodenum. CONCLUSION: IVC taping using the mesenteric approach allowed safe retrieval of the IVC filter after RPLND without postoperative complications.

Four-directional approach to the meso-transverse attachment combined with preoperative radiological vascular simulation facilitates short-term surgical outcomes in laparoscopic transverse colon cancer surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Transverse colon resection is one of the most difficult laparoscopic procedures because of anatomic hazards such as variations in the mesenteric vascular anatomy and the complex structure of organs and surrounding membranes. METHODS: We evaluated the short-term surgical outcomes of laparoscopic transverse colon resection using a creative approach. This approach included preoperative surgical simulation using virtual surgical anatomy by CT, a four-directional approach to the mesentery, and 3-D imaging during laparoscopic surgery. RESULTS: A total of 45 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic resection for transverse colon cancer from June 2013 to December 2017 were enrolled in this study. All procedures were completed safely, with minor postoperative complications, including two patients with anastomotic stenosis, two with intra-abdominal phlegmon, one with delayed gastric emptying, and one with pneumonia, all treated non-operatively. There were no conversions to open resection. Operation time was 203 min (range, 125-322 min), and the estimated blood loss during surgery was 5 mL (range, 0-370 mL). The mean postoperative hospital stay was 10 days (range, 7-21 days), and no patients required readmission. CONCLUSION: Short-term surgical outcomes after laparoscopic transverse colon resection demonstrated that this creative approach was safe and feasible. The four-directional approach to the meso-transverse attachment combined with preoperative radiological simulation can facilitate laparoscopic transverse colon surgery.

MAPLE-PD trial (Mesenteric Approach vs. Conventional Approach for Pancreatic Cancer during Pancreaticoduodenectomy): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial of 354 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The mesenteric approach is an artery-first approach to pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer, which starts with the dissection of connective tissues around the superior mesenteric artery. The procedure aims for early confirmation of resectability by checking the surgical margin around the superior mesenteric artery first during the operation. It also aims to decrease intraoperative blood loss by early ligation of the inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery and to increase R0 rate by complete clearance of the lymph nodes around the superior mesenteric artery and pancreatic head plexus II, the most favorable positive margin site for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Furthermore, it aims to avoid the spread of cancer cells during operation (nontouch isolation technique). The MAPLE-PD (Mesenteric Approach vs. Conventional Approach for Pancreatic Cancer during Pancreaticoduodenectomy) trial investigates whether the mesenteric approach can prolong the survival of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who undergo pancreaticoduodenectomy compared with the conventional approach. METHODS/DESIGN: The MAPLE-PD trial is a Japanese multicenter randomized controlled trial that compares the surgical outcomes between the mesenteric and conventional approaches to pancreaticoduodenectomy. Patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma scheduled to undergo pancreaticoduodenectomy are randomized before operation to either a conventional approach (arm A) or a mesenteric approach (arm B). In arm A, the operation starts with Kocher's maneuver. At the final step of the removal procedure, the connective tissues around the superior mesenteric artery are dissected. In arm B, the operation starts with dissection of the connective tissues around the superior mesenteric artery and ends with Kocher's maneuver. In total, 354 patients from 15 Japanese high-volume centers will be randomized. The primary endpoint is overall survival by intention-to-treat analysis. Secondary endpoints include intraoperative blood loss, R0 rate, and recurrence-free survival. DISCUSSION: If the MAPLE-PD trial shows the oncological benefits of the mesenteric approach for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, this procedure may become a standard approach to pancreaticoduodenectomy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03317886 . Registered on 23 October 2017. University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000029615 . Registered on 15 January 2018.

Early ligation of the dorsal pancreatic artery with a mesenteric approach reduces intraoperative blood loss during pancreatoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Early ligation of the inferior pancreatoduodenal artery has been advocated to reduce blood loss during pancreatoduodenectomy. However, the impact of early ligation of the dorsal pancreatic artery (DPA) remains unclear. This study was performed to investigate the clinical implications of early ligation of the DPA. METHODS: From October 2014 to April 2017, 34 consecutive patients underwent pancreatoduodenectomy using a mesenteric approach. The patients were divided into the early DPA ligation group (n = 15) and late DPA ligation group (n = 19). The clinical features were retrospectively compared between the two groups (H29-044). RESULTS: Preoperative multidetector row computed tomography and intraoperative findings revealed that the right branch of the DPA supplied the pancreatic head region in all cases. Intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the early than late ligation group (median 609 ml [range 94-1,013 ml] vs. 764 ml [range 367-1,828 ml], respectively; P = 0.008). Multivariable analysis revealed that early DPA ligation was independently associated with blood loss (P = 0.023). The DPAs arising from the superior mesenteric artery underwent early ligation at a significantly higher rate. CONCLUSIONS: Early ligation of the DPA during pancreaticoduodenectomy with a mesenteric approach could reduce intraoperative blood loss.

Mesenteric approach during pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Mesenteric approach is an artery-first approach during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). In the present study, we evaluated clinical and oncological benefits of this procedure for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) of the pancreas head. Between 2000 and 2015, 237 consecutive PDAC patients underwent PD. Among them, 72 experienced the mesenteric approach (mesenteric group) and 165 the conventional approach (conventional group). A matched-pairs group consisted of 116 patients (58 patients in each group) matched for age, gender, resectability status, and neoadjuvant therapy. Surgical and oncological outcomes were compared between the two groups in unmatched- and matched-pair analyses. Intraoperative blood loss was lower in the mesenteric group than in the conventional group in both resectable PDAC (R-PDAC) and borderline resectable PDAC (BR-PDAC) on unmatched- and matched-pairs analyses (R-PDAC, unmatched: 312.5 vs 510 mL, P=.008; matched: 312.5 vs 501.5 mL, P=.023; BR-PDAC, unmatched: 507.5 vs 935 mL, P<.001; matched: 507.5 vs 920 mL, P=.003). Negative surgical margins (R0) and overall survival (OS) rates in the mesenteric group were better in R-PDAC patients (R0 rates, unmatched: 100% vs 87.7%, P=.044; matched: 100% vs 86.7%, P=.045; OS, unmatched: P=.008, matched: P=.021), although there were no significant differences in BR-PDAC patients. Mesenteric approach might reduce blood loss by early ligation of the vessels to the pancreatic head. Furthermore, it might increase R0 rate, leading to improvement of survival for R-PDAC patients. However, R0 and survival rates could not be improved only by the mesenteric approach for BR-PDAC patients. Therefore, effective multidisciplinary treatment is essential to improve survival in BR-PDAC patients.

Tips and tricks of the surgical technique for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: mesenteric approach and modified distal pancreatectomy with en-bloc celiac axis resection.

Borderline resectable (BR) pancreatic cancer involves the portal vein and/or superior mesenteric vein (PV/SMV), major arteries including the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) or common hepatic artery (CHA), and sometimes includes the involvement of the celiac axis. We herein describe tips and tricks for a surgical technique with video assistance, which may increase the R0 rates and decrease the mortality and morbidity for BR pancreatic cancer patients. First, we describe the techniques used for the "artery-first" approach for BR pancreatic cancer with involvement of the PV/SMV and/or SMA. Next, we describe the techniques used for distal pancreatectomy with en-bloc celiac axis resection (DP-CAR) and tips for decreasing the delayed gastric emptying (DGE) rates for advanced pancreatic body cancer. The mesenteric approach, followed by the dissection of posterior tissues of the SMV and SMA, is a feasible procedure to obtain R0 rates and decrease the mortality and morbidity, and the combination of this aggressive procedure and adjuvant chemo(radiation) therapy may improve the survival of BR pancreatic cancer patients. The DP-CAR procedure may increase the R0 rates for pancreatic cancer patients with involvement within 10 mm from the root of the splenic artery, as well as the CHA or celiac axis, and preserving the left gastric artery may lead to a decrease in the DGE rates in cases where there is more than 10 mm between the tumor edge and the root of the left gastric artery. The development of safer surgical procedures is necessary to improve the survival of BR pancreatic cancer patients.

Treatment of duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumor via mesenteric approach / 中华消化外科杂志

Objective To summarize the surgical skills of the pancreaticoduodenectomy via mesenteric approach for the treatment of duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs).Methods The clinical data of 1 patient with huge duodenal GIST combined with gastrointestinal hemorrhage and liver metastasis who was admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University in June 2014 were retrospectively analyzed.The patient had continuous bleeding before the operation.The results of computed tomography (CT) showed that there was a solid tumor below the liver and in front of the right kidney,with the size of 12.2 cm × 8.1 cm,inferior vena cava was squeezed by the tumor,a solid tumor was detected in the right lobe of liver,and the colon was suspiciously invaded by the tumor.The patient received pancreaticoduodenectomy,right hemicolectomy and right lobectomy of liver metastases.The patient was followed up by out patient examination and telephone interview up to August 2014.Results The operation time,volume of blood loss and volume of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion were 420 minutes,800 mL and 2 U,respectively,with a full recovery of patients.The duodenal GIST with metastasis tumor and necrosis located at the colon,pancreatis,liver and renal hilum was confirmed by pathological diagnosis.The life quality of the patient was good by follow-up at postoperative month 3.Conclusion In the pancreaticoduodenectomy via mesenteric approach,surgeons perform vigorously the method of mesenteric approach at the first stage of operation,it could maximally reduce the risk of operation and the volume of blood loss.

Radical pancreaticoduodenectomy via mesenteric approach / 中华消化外科杂志

Radical pancreaticoduodenectomy is the only effective method for the treatment of malignancies in the pancreatic head and the periampulary region.Early determination of the involvement of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA)is important for the selection of the surgical procedure and judgment of the prognosis.The operation should follow the principle of tumor-free and adequate resection range,safe resection margin and complete lymph node resection.For this purpose,we performed the radical pancreaticoduodenectomy via mesenteric approach.The SMA was dissected first,and then the tumor was en-bloc resected.From December 2011 to December 2012,24 patients with tumors in the pancreatic head or the periampullary region received radical pancreaticoduodenectomy via the mesenteric approach at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University,and the short-term outcome was satisfactory.